DOCSLIB.ORG

Imbliography Dr. Henry Sacheverell

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Imbliography Dr. Henry Sacheverell A B I B L I O G R A P H Y O F ACH EVE R E L S L. ‘ 1 F . PRE ACE . h as deeply touch ed the of En land mus worth t f L people g t be y k V ' of s n n aflair of clo e atte tio . The Dr . Sacheverell occupied the greater ar of a s ss n of am n aus n p t e io parli e t, c ed i de scribable enthusiasm accompanied by popular r o s a in r f n i t , nd the wo ds o a great co tem orar s r an f r r w s o u p y hi to i , o th ee eek to k p ’ all men s thoughts so that all other busi ” n ss r a v e was at a stand . The g e t wa e of f n s n w s ut in s n eeli g oo holly pas ed, b pas i g it deluged our libraries wi th a flood of the worst- printed books that English literature has known . The matter and sentiments of these volumes do not indeed wholly belie e r u war ar h u s ns in th i o t d g b, yet t e q e tio volved were great ; and if th e central figure i s unw r of i ts a th s n rs n n o thy pl ce, e by ta de o e the less saw i n Sacheverell the champion of r r us and a r a a au a g eat eligio g e t politic l c se. A brief account ofthe circumstances leading up to and attending the trial will be a neces ar ke to ra w f s s y y the bibliog phy hich ollow . For the arran ment of this am hlet se e 8 ge p p p . Henry Sacheverell was born i n 1 6 7 2 at ar r u w r was u a at M lbo o gh, he e he ed c ted the rammar s an w n was s n g chool, d he ce he e t i n 1 68 to a a n xf r . 9 M gd le College, O o d At the university he does not seem to have s n u s e m s f bu f r n ra m r di ti g i h d hi el , t o ge e l e it was e w of hi s in 1 0 1 elected F llo College 7 , a s n w r a ne un 1 1 po itio hich he et i d til 7 3 . r i s not wan n v n us ar e v The e ti g, e e th e ly, i dence of that stubborn grain in the young ’ Sacheverell s nature o f which he gave more f r n 1 abundant proo in later yea s . I 693 he was brought up before the President and admonished propter contumaciam e t con temptum erga Decanum Artium and we m ay remember that it is a man wh o knew a a n s n af er v n s of 1 68 M gd le oo t the e e t 7 , wh was un r the n u n of Dr. u o de i fl e ce Ho gh , a nd who enjoyed the close friendship of s n w m w find a r on Joseph Addi o , ho e l te the un m r m s n r a r of N on - r s s an co p o i i g p e che e i t ce. While holdi ng the vicarage of Cannock he was appointed by popular election preacher ’ av ur s u war i n 1 0 but at St. S io , So th k, 7 5 , r a n n 1 0 attracted no gene al ttentio u til 7 9 . n t a ar in an assiz s rm n at r I h t ye , e e o De by n u us 1 th and w s i s ron er lan o A g t 4 , ith t ll t g ’ . au s a ra on . th guage at St P l C thed l Nov s , r n n f an x r m n he delive ed opi io s o e t e e ki d. I n three ways he challenged notice : as a High Churchman he declared th e Church of England to be i n danger from false ” r r n an a m a a ns r us b eth e , d decl i ed g i t eligio tolerance ; as a Tory he upheld the principle — of N on resistance without acknowledgi ng any 5 possible exception to it ; and as a strong ar c r r sur r p tisan he atta ked the Lo d T ea e , r u r s but a sma n w Godolphin. It eq i e ll k o l edge of the politics of the time to see h ow each of these positions involved peculiar ffi u n a its f n r i n rn di c lty, a d pl ced de e de tho y w s I r a n th ay . n the fi st he ch lle ged e oppo s i u of a as w as of w it o Ho dly, ell the hole body of Dissenters ; by the second he raised s a u s ns w r N on- r s s tho e delic te q e tio , hethe e i t ance was compatible with Revolution prin ” ’ ci le s on w a as s h e u n s r to p , h t b i t Q ee ight ru was r s in and w r a sm in le e t g, hethe J cobiti any form could be entertai ned by loyal subjects ; while the third could only be successfully carrie d through on the assum — p tion of a Tory reaction which had indeed se t i n but o w ns h , f hich the sig ad hitherto n an l n b ee fe w d equivoca . Rou d these and s m ar n s s s s an i il poi t the peeche , debate , d pamphlets circled ; and it is no wonder that th e Queen herself hesitated i n h er line of a n. us of mm ns w v r ctio The Ho e Co o , ho e e , sh owed no such vacillation they boldly did e verything that was calculated to defeat their n n s . An m m n r o w e d i peach e t of D . Sache ve re ll before the House of Lords was voted n aft r mu a ur n w a d e ch del y, d i g hich the Ch urch and the Tories were gathering round r am n r a n W th ei ch pio , the t i l bega m est h -t ns r a on a t 1 1 0 . m i te H ll, Feb. 7 , 7 The Mana g ers for the House of Commons opened the ’ m a m n a r s uns f i pe ch e t, S cheve ell co el ollowed, an d he him self delivered a speech so different m his usua s an s s fu fro l tyle, d o kil l and re 6 fin d a w n ra a ri u e , th t it as ge e lly tt b ted at the m r ur n ana r ha ti e to Atte b y. Whe the M ge s d r a was ransf rr eplied, the deb te t e ed to the us of rds and in en o n ar Ho e Lo the d, M ch 2 rd 1 1 0 a v r was lar ui 3 , 7 , S che e ell dec ed g lty by the Upper House by sixty- nine votes to f - fity two . The sentence suspended him from r a n for r ar n r r h p e chi g th ee ye s, a d o de ed t e ’ St . Paul s sermon to be burnt ; but its le nity was n n w o ly too evide t, and it as accepted throughout the country as a victory instead f f r o a de eat . Not only was Sacheve ell feted w r r m but a ss ur i n he eve he oved, ddre es po ed from all parts of the country to the Queen i n support of his principles . I n point of fact f it was the af air of Dr. Sacheverell which turned out the Whig Ministry and brought i n r un r ar i n N ov . 1 1 0 the To ies de H ley 7 . I n 1 1 w n rm of r ars 7 3 , he the te th ee ye had ’ x r a ua n of .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Edmund Burke and the Common Law Tradition Reconsidered
    イギリス哲学研究 第 33 号（2010 年） Edmund Burke and the Common Law Tradition Reconsidered Sora Sato Introduction: John Pocock’s ‘Edmund Burke and the Ancient Constitution’ In The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law (first published in 1957, reissued in 1987), J.G.A. Pocock argues: Every one of Burke’s cardinal points, as just enumerated, can be found in Hale rebuking Hobbes, in Coke rebuking James I, or in Davies rebuking the partisans of written law;... From what sources Burke derived it, and with what elements of eighteenth-century thought and his own genius he enriched it, are questions for the specialist; but that Burke’s philosophy is in great measure a revitalization of the concept of custom and the common-law tradition may be safely asserted as part of the present study’s contentions.（1） In his essay entitled ‘Burke and the Ancient Constitution’, （2） Pocock repeats his argument that Burke’s traditionalism should be understood in the context of the common law tradition, and also that Burke was aware of this tradition. At the end of this essay he also writes: in order to explain Burke’s traditionalism, there is no need to suppose more than his continued employment and highly developed understanding of certain concepts which came from the common law (as he [Burke] recognized) and were generally in use ＊ This essay is largely based upon the present author’s MSc dissertation submitted to University of Edinburgh in August 2009. I would like to thank Professors Thomas Ahnert, Harry Dickinson, Tamotsu Nishizawa, Kenji Fujii and two anonymous referees for their valuable comments.
    [Show full text]
  • I Queen Anne's Upbringing, Education, and Their Impact
    QUEEN ANNE’S UPBRINGING, EDUCATION, AND THEIR IMPACT ON HER REIGN AND INFLUENCE OVER THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND A Thesis submitted by Troy A. Heffernan, BA, MA For the award of Doctor of Philosophy 2017 I ABSTRACT Three hundred years of historical study has shaped current understandings of Queen Anne, but little has been written about the influence she believed she held in shaping England’s politics and religion, or how both shaped her actions as Queen and Supreme Governor of the Church of England. This thesis begins by examining the implications of Anne’s unremarkable place in the line of succession. It assesses why the Catholic suspicions surrounding her father and uncle (James, Duke of York and King Charles II) unexpectedly shaped the approach of a future queen regnant to her sovereignty. An evaluation of Anne’s upbringing and beliefs concerning the Church’s role in government and society establishes that her political and religious views were defined before and during James II’s reign, leading up to the 1688 Revolution, and continued to mature throughout William III’s rule. The consequence of the political landscape she inherited, and her education and beliefs, is that she was destined to face conflict with the Whig-majority in the House of Lords and Whig-sympathetic bishops in the episcopate. After Anne became queen, she attempted to protect the Church by increasing its voting influence in Parliament and the episcopate by filling the episcopal bench with Tory-sympathetic bishops who shared her vision. She was nonetheless often defeated by her inability to combat the Whiggish strength in Parliament and influence in the episcopate that had grown during William’s reign, but Anne adapted and she represents a new expression of monarchical rule with minimal royal prerogative or authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from Manchesterhive.Com at 10/01/2021 11:30:13AM Via Free Access
    Republican politics after 1714 6 . Sapere aude: ‘commonwealth’ politics under George I, 1714–22 n the night of 1 March 1710, London was convulsed by rioting crowds. ODuring the course of the evening dissenting meeting-houses were attacked and destroyed, lords, earls and bishops were insulted and affronted in the streets, and many citizens were beaten, assaulted and even killed. Any who refused to join in with the chant of ‘High Church and Sacheverell’ were ‘knocked down’ by armed and increasingly violent men.1 Abigail Harley writing to Edward Harley in Oxford the day after the tumult, commented that ‘now we hear nothing but drums’.2 The cause of all this disorder was a conflict over whether Christian culture was determined by men of reason and toleration, or men of God and authority. The Whig prosecution defended the Erastian principle, ‘by which all ecclesiastical jurisdiction … is made subject to the civil power’, and reinforced its commitment to Protestant civil liberties by prose- cuting the High Church clergyman Henry Sacheverell.3 Toland was intimate with many of the leading actors in the public trial. Despite Sacheverell’s conviction, his reputation as a defender of ‘the church in danger’ set the scene for the triumph of the Tory party that was swept to power in the following General Election. Clerical politics was civil politics under another name. Toland saw the trial as a critical moment in the republican war against priestcraft. In a number of works published between 1710 and 1714 he struggled to establish the dangers of such clericalism to public virtue, addressing much of the argument to the Hanoverian court.
    [Show full text]
  • Download (443Kb)
    University of Warwick institutional repository: http://go.warwick.ac.uk/wrap This paper is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please scroll down to view the document itself. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our policy information available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this paper please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published version may require a subscription. Author(s): MARK KNIGHTS Article Title: Introduction: The View from 1710 Year of publication: 2012 Link to published article: http;//dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-0206.2011.00284.x Publisher statement: : ‘The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.com’. Introduction: The view from 1710 Mark Knights Abstract: The essays in this volume, planned to mark the tercentenary of the impeachment of Dr Henry Sacheverell on 23 March 1710, reassess the importance of his trial. Sacheverell’s attack on the revolution of 1688, and the principles which underpinned it, allows us to question how far, twenty years later, a Whig revolution had prevailed. The essays suggest that the revolution continued to be contested; that in 1710 the High Church Tory vision temporarily triumphed; that the flood of print showed the importance of religious dispute in shaping the public sphere; that the debate over Sacheverell connected Westminster and the public, not just in England but also in Ireland; that there was an important disagreement between High and Low Church about how to respond
    [Show full text]
  • The Background to the Sacheverel Riots
    The Background to the Sacheverell Riots of 1714 and 1715 in Birmingham and the Sutton Coldfield Connection By Roy Billingham Henry Sacheverell, by Thomas Gibson, c.1710 In the autumn of 1714 the townsfolk of Sutton Coldfield were witnesses to an event that occurred at their parish church that was symptomatic of the religious and political passions which were rife at this period both in the Midlands and elsewhere in Britain. Jacobitism was like a smouldering fuse that burnt for many years creating social unrest and threatening mayhem, and Sutton Coldfield played a minor role in this state of affairs in the Midlands. Queen Anne had recently died and the Nation was facing up to the Hanoverian succession that was bitterly opposed by many sections of society who were either in favour of a hereditary royal succession or were against the imposition of a foreign king. However, it perhaps will help our understanding of these turbulent events if we consider the elements of British history that contributed to this situation. Following the controversial ‘warming-pan’ birth of James Francis Edward Stuart in 1688 to Mary of Modena, James II’s second wife and a Catholic whose babies had previously either miscarried or died in infancy, and after receiving a written invitation from four Whig lords and three Tories, the Calvinist William III of Orange landed at Brixham on November 5, 1688, with the intention of dethroning the unpopular and despotic Catholic King James II. William and his army marched on London and James II fled to France. William agreed eventually to accept the crown jointly with his wife Mary Stuart in May 1689.
    [Show full text]
  • London Newspapers and Domestic Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century
    London Newspapers and Domestic Politics in the Early Eighteenth Century Professor Hannah Barker, University of Manchester Introduction Though public opinion had already emerged as a powerful and century, popular protests – and newspapers – made a decisive unpredictable force by the end of the seventeenth century, it impact on government policy. Moreover, even if popular is arguable that popular sentiment in early eighteenth-century opinion was sometimes orchestrated or influenced by an elite, England had only a limited impact on the way the country the fact that it was useful, appropriate or necessary for them was run.1 For much of this period, government was decided to do so, was arguably more significant. Whether ‘genuinely’ by a tight circle dominated by the court and the aristocracy, extra-parliamentary in origin or sponsored by the political elite, whilst many of the public outcries which did take place were popular opinion emerged as an important factor in the nation’s constructed and encouraged by members of the social and political life. The newspaper press was increasingly associated political elite, rather than stemming spontaneously from those with the formation and articulation of such sentiment. ‘out-of-doors’. However, despite the political dominance of a small class, the secretive and traditional form of politics that they practised was increasingly under attack from a popular print culture that espoused openness; it was often critical of government, and during periods of acute political crisis was able to influence the way politicians chose to act. Thus on a few 1 For a broad overview of the eighteenth century, see Hannah Barker, notable occasions in the opening decades of the eighteenth Newspapers, Politics and English Society 1695–1855 (Harlow, 2000).
    [Show full text]
  • Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons Dissertations Theses and Dissertations 2017 Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760 Amy Oberlin Loyola University Chicago Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss Part of the History Commons Recommended Citation Oberlin, Amy, "Love and Loyal Actions': Ritual Affect and Royal Authority, 1688-1760" (2017). Dissertations. 2835. https://ecommons.luc.edu/luc_diss/2835 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses and Dissertations at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Copyright © 2017 Amy Oberlin LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO "LOVE AND LOYAL ACTIONS": RITUAL AFFECT AND ROYAL AUTHORITY, 1688-1760 A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL IN CANDIDACY FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY PROGRAM IN HISTORY BY AMY B. OBERLIN CHICAGO, IL AUGUST 2017 Copyright by Amy Oberlin, 2017 All rights reserved. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This project would not have been possible without the support and encouragement of a large number of people. My dissertation supervisor, Robert Bucholz, took me on as his student shortly after I entered the Ph.D. program in 2010. However, his influence and inspiration in my life began at the very start of my graduate studies when I took his Early Modern England class as a new graduate student studying for my Master's degree in medieval history. His passion for his topic reignited my own interest in the period. His kindness and dedication to all of his students was evident and inspiring from the beginning.
    [Show full text]
  • The Politics of Handel's Early London Operas
    Journal of Interdisciplinary History, xxxvi:3 (Winter, 2006), 445–472. HANDEL’S EARLY LONDON OPERAS Paul Monod The Politics of Handel’s Early London Operas, 1711–1718 It was the winter of 1710, and, according to John Mainwaring, Handel’s earliest biographer, “scarce a mail arrived . which did not bring some fresh account of victories or advan- tages gained by the English hero [John Churchill, Duke of Marlborough] over the armies of a Monarch, but lately the terror of Europe [Louis XIV].” Yet England, victorious in war, was also a nation torn by partisan strife between Whigs and Tories. The former adhered to principles of resistance to tyranny, toleration for religious dissenters, and war with France; the latter advocated obe- dience to monarchy, Anglican hegemony, and peace abroad. What the divided polity needed, Mainwaring wrote, was music— speciªcally, Handel’s music. “Nothing indeed seemed wanting to compleat the national felicity, but a person capable of charming down, by the magic of his melody, that evil spirit of faction and party, which fortune seems, at this time, to have conjured up.” Unfortunately, the magic did not work. “Handel, great as he was, could not do for England, what David did for Saul,” although Mainwaring implies that he made a good try at it.1 Mainwaring was not accurate about Marlborough’s great vic- tories, which had ended over a year before, but he was correct about the intense party strife of this period. It had reached a peak in February 1710 with the decision of the Whig government to put on trial Henry Sacheverell, a Tory clergyman, for preaching a seditious sermon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Government's Participation
    THE EVOLUTION OF THE GOVERNMENT’S PARTICIPATION IN AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN LATE-SEVENTEENTH AND EARLY-EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty of The University of Akron In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Arts Aaron VanHorn December, 2014 THE EVOLUTION OF THE GOVERNMENT’S PARTICIPATION IN AND MANAGEMENT OF THE PUBLIC SPHERE IN LATE-SEVENTEENTH AND EARLY-EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND Aaron VanHorn Thesis Approved: Accepted: ______________________________ _____________________________ Advisor Dean of the College Dr. Michael Graham Dr. Chand Midha ______________________________ _____________________________ Co-Advisor Interim Dean of the Graduate School Dr. Michael Levin Dr. Rex D. Ramsier ______________________________ _____________________________ Department Chair Date Dr. Martin Wainwright ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page CHAPTER I. INTRODUCTION .…………………………………………………………………….1 II. THE POPISH PLOT AND THE EXCLUSION CRISIS ..............................................7 III. THE GLORIOUS REVOLUTION ...……………………………………………….42 IV. THE SACHEVERELL “INCIDENT” AND ITS AFTERMATH ………………….63 V. THE END OF THE WAR OF THE SPANISH SUCESSION AND THE TREATY OF UTRECHT …..………………………………………………………………………….86 VI. CONCLUSION ..…………………………………………………………………..114 BIBLIOGRAPHY ……………………………………………………………………..122 iii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The late-seventeenth and early-eighteenth centuries saw England experience a dramatic shift.1 This change took place across a variety of fields. Two areas of interest to
    [Show full text]
  • Political Argument in Edmund Burke's Reflections: A
    POLITICAL ARGUMENT IN EDMUND BURKE‟S REFLECTIONS: A CONTEXTUAL STUDY BY BEN JAMES TAYLOR A thesis submitted to The University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Political Science and International Studies School of Social Sciences The University of Birmingham December 2010 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT The present thesis offers a historical interpretation of Edmund Burke‟s classic text, Reflections on the Revolution in France. By contrast to the existing literature, it studies Burke‟s work as a purposive intervention in a domestic problem complex that turned upon the ways in which the French Revolution was refracted in various British contexts of argument. In short, British radicals put the principles and the very idea of the French Revolution to unique uses, employing them to increase the legitimacy and potency of their own arguments. To this end, they appealed to the authority of the French Revolution to augment their dynamic reading of the English Revolution of 1688, and denounced the lack of liberty in Britain by holding the French system of representation up as a model which would provide a genuinely accountable and participatory government.
    [Show full text]
  • Riots As a Measure of Religious Conflict in Seventeenth and Eighteenth Century England
    RIOTS AS A MEASURE OF RELIGIOUS CONFLICT IN SEVENTEENTH AND EIGHTEENTH CENTURY ENGLAND DONALD McADAMS Southwestern Union College Keene, Texas The English break with Rome in the 16th century was accom- plished without the violence and war that characterized the Reformation elsewhere in Europe. This is not because Englishmen were mild men with shallow religious experiences or men with a natural bent towards toleration. It was the strength of the Tudors and the cautious, latitudinarian settlement of Elizabeth that enabled the English to escape the terrors of civil war, while the Narrow Sea protected them from the armies of the Counter Reformation. But if the English Reformation was quiet by Con- tinental standards, it was by no means peaceful. Protestants and Catholics died legally for their faith, and widespread, lawless violence destroyed much life and property. And this violence, associated with the Reformation, did not end with the stable years of Elizabeth. The Reformation left a legacy of hatred that erupted into civil war in the 17th century and continued to create great public disturbances until the end of the 18th century. It is the violence of these centuries, specific- ally the urban riots, that I propose to examine. I believe that they are a significant indicator of the gradual subsiding of the religious intolerance that so marked the period before 1660. 1. Definitions Before we can examine these urban riots it is necessary to define a few terms. I am defining "riots" as activity by three or more people acting in a non-military capacity, publicly and con- sciously endangering life and property, and directing their 4orts 290 DONALD McADAMS against de facto governmental authority or against other rnembers of the same political community? For this period of English history there is no ditficulty in separating riots from other forms of urban violence-mutiny, insurrection, or revolution-but rather in distinguishing urban riots from rural uprisings.
    [Show full text]
  • George I Slides 3 2020
    23/12/2020 Hanover in 1714- 1727. Brunswick Wolfenbüttel claimed by George in 1701 near the start of the Great Northern War and Bremen and Verden acquired from Sweden in 1719 towards the end of the war. George’s brother Ernest was Bishop of Osnabruck 1715-1728 1 2 Ernest Augustus, George’s youngest brother and closest supporter who fought with him at Neerwinden in 1693 and served in the War of the Spanish Succession at the siege of Lille in Melusine von der Schulenburg 1667-1743, Sophia von Platen 1675-1725, wife of Baron 1708. In 1709 he heard Handel’s Agrippina in Venice and persuaded him to move to Hanover. Duchess of Munster (1716), Duchess of Johann von Kielmansegge (married 1701, When George succeeded in 1714 he acted as regent in Hanover and guardian of Prince Kendal (1719) and Princess of Eberstein died 1717), Countess of Leinster (1721) and Frederick. He succeeded as Bishop of Osnabruck in 1715. He visited England in 1716 when he (1723). “The Scarecrow”, “The Maypole” or Countess of Darlington (1722). “The was made Duke of York and in 1718 to be invested as a KG. “The Goose”. George’s mistress. Elephant and Castle”. George’s half-sister. 3 4 Lionel Sackville who informed George he had succeeded and carried the sceptre at the Coronation and was created Groom of the Stole. He was created Duke of Dorset in 1720 and became Lord Steward in 1725 in Walpole’s Government. He also served in George II’s administrations Britannia offering George the crown by John Vanderbank Print by Michiel van der Gucht 5 6 1 23/12/2020 The Peregrine and other royal vessels off Greenwich by Jan Griffier I c 1710.
    [Show full text]