Property & Greenspace

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Property & Greenspace Property & Greenspace Australia April 2021 About CoreLogic CoreLogic is a leading property information, analytics and Contact services provider in the United States, Australia and New Zealand. CoreLogic helps clients identify and manage growth opportunities, improve Call us 1300 734 318 performance and mitigate risk, by providing clients with innovative, [email protected] technology-based services and access to rich data and analytics. Whilst all reasonable effort is made to ensure the information in this publication is current, CoreLogic does not warrant the accuracy, currency or completeness of the data and commentary contained in this publication and to the full extent not prohibited by law excludes all loss or damage arising in connection with the data and commentary contained in this publication. Author: Anna Russell, Senior Professional, Consulting & Risk Management corelogic.com.au 2 What value does the property market put on greenspace? Greenspace has a known value in improving mental and physical health as well as perceived wellbeing. Other benefits include increased levels of resident exercise and A large proportion of the prior studies investigating price potential for reduction in crime. International studies have premiums on greenspace have been conducted in the Northern suggested that the positive effects of greenspace may translate Hemisphere, with only one substantial study (Lockwood & to a price premium for residential property, with both proximity Tracy, 1995) conducted in Australia. The Australian property to public greenspace and the presence of private greenspace market, and the manner in which the Australian public relate to having the potential to encourage a price premium in certain and value property, is distinctly different to other markets; as a markets. result the value ascribed to greenspace may also be different. Whilst property ownership is proportionally low in many This paper explores the benefits of greenspace and the European nations, and multiple property ownership is overseas evidence for a price premium in ‘green’ locations, and uncommon, Australia has a relatively high rate of home then utilises a blend of CoreLogic and public data to conduct an ownership, and property as an asset class for wealth building is initial investigation into whether the Australian market also a popular option amongst investors. Further, the parameters of considers greenspace worthy of a price premium. the Australian mortgage market do not allow for non-recourse default in the same way as the US. This means Australian The term ‘greenspace’ refers to land that is partly or completely homeowners are more likely to ‘stick it out’ when their covered with grass, trees, shrubs or other vegetation.1 In the ownership position is not ideal. We see examples of this in how context of cities, greenspace includes parks, community Australians responded to the 2020 Black Summer fires and also gardens, cemeteries, school yards, playgrounds and vacant lots. tropical cyclones such as Cyclone Debbie in 2017. Greenspace may be public and available for all members of the community to benefit from, or it may be privately owned such as large yards or gardens. In academic studies, greenspace is often measured using a measure called “Normalised Difference Vegetation Index” which is derived from satellite imagery. 1 https://www3.epa.gov/region1/eco/uep/openspace.html 3 Access to nature makes us healthier, happier and more resilient There is a large body of literature across both health science The study found that living within 300m of public green space and urban planning disciplines evidencing health and wellbeing had a significant effect on perceived wellbeing of residents in a benefits from exposure to nature. A particularly significant densely populated urban setting. It also found that perceived example is Engemann et al’s report published in 20192, wellbeing went up significantly as the area of greenspace examining the impact of greenspace exposure on mental available increased.3 health. The study used satellite imagery to determine the Normalised Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) within a 210m x Greenspace also has the potential to improve a range of 210m square around the residence of 943,027 Danish children physical conditions, most specifically those associated with the from birth to the age of 10 years. Across this large cohort the western lifestyle – obesity, hypertension and blood sugar study found that the impact of greenspace on a person’s disorders, which frequently co-exist as metabolic syndrome. A likelihood to express a psychiatric disorder was comparable to longitudinal study of 6,000 British adults from 1997 to 2013 other factors such as family history and parental age, higher found that long term exposure to greenspace appears to play than urbanisation and slightly lower than parents’ an important role in preventing metabolic syndrome as well as socioeconomic status. Mood disorders, depression, anxiety reducing or preventing the individual components of the and somatic disorders were most closely linked to NDVI levels disorder such as high blood lipid concentration or 4 indicating that permeation of high-quality greenspace into hypertension . Given the burden these illnesses place on the urban areas might counter many of the woes thought to be due public health system in western countries, plus the inherent to population density and general features of urban living. utility of parks for play and socialisation, provision of greenspace seems a particularly low cost and effective way to These findings are supported by a UK study conducted by reduce the burden of public health costs and deliver a healthier Newcastle University, University of Warwick and University of happier urban population. Sheffield, and published in Applied Geography Aug. 2019. 2 Engemann, E., Pedersen, C., Arge, L., Tsirogiannis, C., Mortensen, P. & Svenning, J., Residential green space in childhood is associated with lower risk of psychiatric disorders from adolescence into adulthood, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences Mar 2019, 116 (11) 5188-5193; DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1807504116 3 Houlden, V., de Albuquerque, J.P., Weich, S. & Jarvis, S. ‘A spatial analysis of proximate greenspace and mental wellbeing in London’, Applied Geography,Volume 109,2019. Sourced at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143622818312384 4 https://www.salud.carlosslim.org/english2/living-near-green-spaces-is-associated-with-a-lower-risk-of-met abolic-syndrome/#:~:text=NOTICIAS-,Living%20near%20 green%20spaces%20is%20associated%20with%20a%20lower%20risk,conditions%2C%20including%20obesity%20and%20hypertension. 4 Proximity to nature positively impacts urban housing prices – in some settings A meta-analysis of 37 hedonic pricing studies across Europe, North America and Australasia found that urban nature, such as parks and forests, has positive impacts on house value in the areas surrounding it.5 The authors then further interrogated this relationship through a detailed case study in the Dutch city of Utrecht, finding that the presence of urban nature such as reserves, green corridors and play-spaces drove increases in local property values of up to 20% compared to areas in which urban nature was absent. The analysis concluded that both organically situated and man-made urban nature settings can offer both human and price benefits, and that this may apply across a wide range of locations and settings. Closer to home, the 2013 study ‘Valuing Victoria’s Parks’6 showed a 5-7% increase in home value for properties immediately adjacent to parks in Melbourne, with similar data also found for Perth by McIntosh et al. in 2014.7 Lockwood & Tracy’s 1995 analysis hints at potential price effects in Sydney, although it deals with a very specific scenario of proximity to Centennial Park.8 5 Brander, L. & Koetse, M., The value of urban open space: Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management, 16 July 2011. 6 Parks Victoria (2015). Valuing Victoria’s parks, Parks Victoria, Melbourne. Sourced at https://soe.environment.gov.au/theme/built-environment/topic/2016/ livability-urban-amenity. 7 McIntosh J, Trubka R & Newman P (2014). Can value capture work in a car- dependent city? Willingness to pay for transit access in Perth, Western Australia. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 67:320–339. 8 Lockwood & Tracy, 1995. In Brander, L.M. & Koetse, M.J. The value of urban open space : Meta-analyses of contingent valuation and hedonic pricing results. Journal of Environmental Management, 16 July 2011. 5 Case Study – Sydney and Surrounds: Association between proximal greenspace and house prices Our case study evaluates the extent to which the presence of Other property features known to influence price such as land greenspace in general and more intensely vegetated size, distance to employment, build quality and number of greenspace forested with trees more than 3m in height co-vary bedrooms are likely to interact with and mediate the influence with residential property prices, based on transactions across of greenspace. Our intention here is to determine if there are Greater Sydney in 2019. We define these two greenspace types indications of a price effect, in order to establish the case for a as ‘greenspace’ and ‘tree cover’ for the purpose of this analysis. more detailed nationwide study prepared in the coming months. As a representation of these greenspace measures, we leveraged a pre-aggregated mesh block level summary of NDVI Preliminary analysis of data indicated mesh block pricing data data prepared by the NSW Dept. of Planning, Industry & was sparse in some locations due to small geographic area and Environment9. The dataset leverages multi-spectral remote low housing turnover. This created some noise in the data sensing data from satellite imagery, providing coverage in making trends harder to extract. A decision was therefore square metres of trees > 3m in height, shrubs, open green made to utilise SA2, with a mean area of 6km2 instead of the space/ grassed area and total ‘greenspace’ as well as mesh more granular mesh block with areas as small as 400m2.
Recommended publications
  • NSW Sydney Moorings Analysis
    NSW Sydney Moorings Analysis Sydney Harbour (Area A) Date Last Mooring Total No. of No. of Private Applicant Mooring Bay Code/Bay Name Allocated & Ratio Applicants Moorings Totals Totals Comments AA - DARLING POINT 4 5/06/2015 25 AC - DOUBLE BAY 31 21/05/2015 203 AD - ELIZABETH BAY 32 9/04/2015 20 AE - FELIX BAY 11 30/03/2015 39 AF - HERMIT BAY 8 31/05/2015 30 AJ - PARSLEY BAY 13 28/05/2015 44 AO - ROSE BAY 40 2/06/2015 138 AP - RUSHCUTTERS BAY 58 27/04/2015 75 AT - VAUCLUSE BAY 25 28/05/2015 72 34% AU - WATSONS BAY 45 5/03/2015 131 267 777 Sydney Harbour (Area B) BB - BEAUTY POINT 0 8/05/2014 17 BE - CASTLECRAG 5 12/05/2015 45 BN - KILLARNEY 14 2/06/2015 68 BP - LONG BAY 5 29/04/2015 86 BR - NORTHBRIDGE 0 23/03/2015 52 BS - PEARL BAY 1 19/05/2015 145 BT - PICKERING POINT 0 7/05/2015 56 BU - POWDER HULK BAY 6 25/05/2015 105 BV - QUAKERS HAT BAY 0 12/06/2015 93 BX - SAILORS BAY 12 8/04/2015 62 BY - SALT PAN CREEK 3 7/05/2015 25 CA - SEAFORTH 0 28/05/2015 56 CD - SUGARLOAF BAY 1 29/04/2015 26 CE - SUGARLOAF POINT 8 7/02/2015 28 7% CH - WILLOUGHBY BAY 5 10/09/2014 32 60 896 Sydney Harbour (Area C) AG - LITTLE MANLY COVE 24 6/05/2015 35 AH - MANLY COVE 52 30/01/2015 86 AI - NORTH HARBOUR 106 1/04/2015 111 BA - BALMORAL 36 2/12/2014 56 BL - FISHER BAY 15 16/02/2015 18 BZ - SANDY BAY 22 17/02/2014 24 GE - CAREENING COVE 27 9/02/2009 18 GL - KIRRIBILLI 8 19/08/1992 2 GN - LITTLE SIRIUS COVE 10 9/04/2015 80 GP - MOSMAN BAY 48 29/01/2015 90 GQ - NEUTRAL BAY 50 6/01/2015 47 GU - SHELL COVE 30 2/06/2015 74 65% GW - TAYLORS BAY 0 28/05/2015 21 428
    [Show full text]
  • Dolans Bay Marina
    EXPANSION OF DOLANS BAY MARINA. MP 10_0017 Submission by George Cotis in opposition to the proposal. In opposing this proposal, I would first like to object to the notification process. Despite the Department notifying residents and households of the exhibition of the proposal to expand Dolans Bay Marina, no notification was given to the occupiers of moorings in Dolans Bay. This is important on a number of grounds: Mooring occupiers may live outside the range of notification methods; There is no way of knowing which moorings may be directly or indirectly affected; Re-location of, or some other negative impact on moorings, is a likely consequence of the proposal. I made this known to the Departmentʼs officer early in the display process without any response. I therefore submit that the notification process is flawed in so far as people likely to be directly and adversely affected may have been excluded or overlooked. Further, the failure anywhere within the material which is on display is it made known which of the moorings in Dolans Bay are directly or indirectly affected, and what is anticipated may be the consequences. This denies the opportunity of informed comment. The expansion is opposed on the following grounds: No need for the expansion (other than the private gain for the proponent) is established. I will, at 1 below address the proponentʼs claims for need. In the event that this is not sufficient ground for refusal/denial, the following are offered as substantial and additional grounds: • The failure of the proposal to meet the tests of the Port Hacking Plan of Management • The failure to tie shore-side infrastructure upgrading with the on-water expansion.
    [Show full text]
  • 11 Better Boating Program
    Info Line 13 12 56 Better Boating Program GRANTS FOR 2010 - 11 www.maritime.nsw.gov.au Total Est.Cost Grant Amount 1 Tweed Heads Boating fees are helping to provide new and improved facilities. 2 Kingscliff North Coast 1 TWEED HEADS - Upgrade of the Kennedy Drive boat ramp, Terranora Creek. $30,500 $15,250 1 Tweed Heads West Ballina 4 3 Ballina 2 KINGSCLIFF - Upgrade of the existing boat ramp at Cudgen Creek. $40,500 $20,250 2 Kingscliff 3 BALLINA - Upgrade of car/trailer parking facilities at the Richmond River Sailing & Rowing Club boat ramp, Ballina CBD. $34,625 $17,310 5 Wardell 4 WEST BALLINA - Upgrade to car/trailer parking at the Emigrant Creek boat ramp (Stage 2 of facility upgrade). $226,980 $110,990 6 Ulmarra 5 WARDELL - Design/planning to upgrade the boat ramp and carpark facility at East Wardell. $21,000 $10,500 West Ballina 4 3 Ballina 14 6 ULMARRA - Construction of a new wharf and pontoon facility at Ulmarra on the Clarence River. $233,328 $116,500 5 Wardell Bingara 1 Tweed Heads 12 Bourke 7 Red Rock 7 - Upgrade of the boat ramp, access road and carparking at Red Rock Recreation Reserve. $99,000 $49,500 6 15 RED ROCK 2 Kingscliff Ulmarra Guyra 8 8 ARRAWARRA - Upgrade of the boat ramp facilities at Arrawarra Beach Reserve (design and consultation). $100,000 $50,000 13 Narrabri Arrawarra 14 Bingara 9 NAMBUCCA HEADS - Installation of a sewage pumpout unit on the existing pontoon at Tourist Office Reserve. $81,500 $40,750 9 Nambucca Heads 12 Bourke 3 Ballina 7 Red Rock 10 MACKSVILLE - Widening of the existing one-lane boat ramp and installation of lighting at Lions Park.
    [Show full text]
  • FACT SHEET W2 Recreational Waterways
    FACT SHEET W2 Recreational Waterways What is Zone W2 Recreational Waterways? W2 is a zone for waterways below the Mean High Water Mark. It seeks to provide for water based recreation and related uses, while still protecting the environmental and scenic qualities of the waterways and maintaining public access and navigability. What can I do in W2 Recreational Waterways? Moorings are permissible without consent in W2. The following uses can be carried out in W2 with development consent: Aquaculture; Boat launching ramps; Boat sheds; Charter tourism boating facilities; Environmental facilities; Environmental protection works; Flood mitigation works; Kiosks; Marinas; Mooring pens; Passenger transport facilities; Recreation facilities (outdoor); Water recreation structures All other uses that are not listed above are prohibited in the zone. To understand the exact planning meanings of these terms, refer to the dictionary in the draft plan. Where does W2 apply? The transfer of Zone 16 under the current SSLEP2006 has been divided into two separate zones: W1 – Natural Waterways and W2 – Recreational Waterways. The W2 zone applies to limited parts of the waterways, including parts of Yowie Bay, Dolans Bay, Burraneer Bay, Gunnamatta Bay, Sylvania Waters, a section of the Georges River, from Corea Street to the North-West point of Kangaroo Point and the two marinas at Sylvania. To see where the W2 zone applies, use the MAPPING TOOL. Fact Sheet: W1 Recreational Waterways – September 2014 – Page 1 of 2 How does W2 differ from Zone 16 – Environmental Protection (Waterways)? The main difference between the W2 Natural Waterways zone and Zone 16 – Environmental Protection (Waterways) is that boatsheds, were prohibited in Zone 16, but are now permitted with development consent within the W2 zone.
    [Show full text]
  • APPENDIX 1 Register of Submitters
    APPENDIX 1 Register of Submitters Appendix 1 - Register of Submitters Group Reference Name View Section where number issues have been addressed Public Division of Resources and Geoscience Comment - Section 4.1 Authorities (DRG) - Resource Regulator Comment Section 4.2 - DPIE - Water Comment Section 4.3 - Environment Protection Authority (EPA) Comment Section 4.4 - WaterNSW Comment Section 4.5 Biodiversity and Conservation Division - Comment - Section 4.6 Environment, Energy and Science - Roads and Maritime Services (RMS) Comment Section 4.9 - Heritage Council Comment Section 4.10 - NSW Rural Fire Service (RFS) Comment Section 4.11 Local Councils - Wollongong City Council Comment Section 4.7 - Wollondilly Shire Council Comment Section 4.8 Stakeholder 334123 IRRM Object Section 5.0 Groups 334196 Georges River Environmental Alliance Object Section 5.0 Illawarra Branch National Parks Association Object 334012 Section 5.0 of NSW 334799 National Parks Association of NSW Comment Section 5.0 334117 Sutherland Shire Environment Centre Object Section 5.0 334143 Lock the gate alliance Object Section 5.0 Australian Youth Climate Coalition Object Section 5.0 334081 Wollongong 333763 Protect Our Water Alliance (POWA) Object Section 5.0 333844 Ausloo Pty Ltd Support 333783 AMP Control Limited Support 334032 Mine & Tunnel Constructions Pty Ltd Support 334021 Bitz Excavations Pty Ltd Support 333944 CJL Haulage Pty Ltd Support 334017 Australian Winch & Haulage Co. Pty. Ltd Support 333715 NCH Australia Pty Ltd Support 333723 HDSecurity Support Individuals
    [Show full text]
  • 12 May Delivery West
    Delivery suburbs and surcharge for 12 MAY 2019 $10 Surcharge $15 Surcharge $20 Surcharge 2037 Forest Lodge 2046 Rodd Point 2114 Denistone West 2041 Balmain East 2047 Drummoyne 2115 Ermington 2050 Camperdown 2049 Lewisham 2122 Eastwood 2050 Missenden Road 2110 Woolwich 2128 Silverwater 2038 Annandale 2204 MarricKville 2200 BanKstown North 2039 Rozelle 2045 Haberfield 2200 BanKstown SQuare 2040 Lilyfield 2046 Russell Lea 2117 Dundas Valley 2041 Balmain 2110 Hunters Hill 2141 Berala 2041 Birchgrove 2130 Summer Hill 2143 Birrong 2040 Leichhardt 2203 Dulwich Hill 2143 Potts Hill 2048 Stanmore 2046 Abbotsford 2143 Regents ParK 2049 Petersham 2046 ChiswicK 2144 Auburn 2049 Petersham North 2046 Five DocK 2199 Yagoona 2204 MarricKville Metro 2046 Wareemba 2199 Yagoona West 2066 Linley Point 2200 BanKstown 2111 Henley 2116 Rydalmere 2111 Huntleys Cove 2117 Dundas 2111 Huntleys Point 2117 Telopea 2131 Ashfield 2142 Clyde 2046 Canada Bay 2142 Rosehill 2066 Lane Cove 2162 Sefton 2066 Lane Cove North 2117 Oatlands 2111 Boronia ParK 2142 Camellia 2111 Gladesville 2142 Granville 2132 Croydon 2142 South Granville 2133 Croydon ParK 2162 Chester Hill 2193 Ashbury 2200 Condell ParK 2066 Lane Cove West 2150 Harris ParK 2111 Tennyson Point 2150 Parramatta 2113 East Ryde 2197 Bass Hill 2134 Burwood 2200 BanKstown Aerodrome 2134 Burwood North 2142 Holroyd 2136 Burwood Heights 2145 Mays Hill 2137 BreaKfast Point 2150 Parramatta Westfield 2137 Cabarita 2151 North Parramatta 2137 Concord 2151 North RocKs 2137 MortlaKe 2160 Merrylands 2112 Putney 2161 Guildford
    [Show full text]
  • Suburb Port Botany Kms Suburb
    SCHEDULE OF DISTANCE (IN KMS) FROM PORT BOTANY CONTIANER TERMINAL PORT PORT SUBURB SUBURB BOTANY BOTANY KMS KMS ABBOTSFORD 22 BADGERYS CREEK 55 AGNES BANKS 74 BALGOWLAH 28 ALEXANDRIA 11 BALGOWLAH HEIGHTS 29 ALLAMBIE 30 BALMAIN 18 ALLAMBIE HEIGHTS 32 BALMAIN EAST 19 ALLAWHA 15 BALMORAL 25 ANNANDALE 16 BANKSIA 11 ANNANGROVE 53 BANKSMEADOW 3 ANZAC VILLAGE 34 BANKSTOWN 26 ARNCLIFFE 12 BANKSTOWN AIRPORT 31 ARNDELL PARK 61 BARDWELL PARK 15 ARTARMON 23 BARRA BRUI 32 ASHBURY 18 BASS HILL 29 ASHCROFT 38 BAULKHAM HILLS 41 ASHFIELD 21 BAULKHAM HILLS EAST 42 ASQUITH 42 BAYVIEW 47 AUBURN 31 BEACON HILL 34 AUSTRAL 46 BEACONSFIELD 10 AVALON 50 BEAUTY POINT 25 AVALON BEACH 50 BEECROFT 35 BELFIELD 23 CABARITA 23 BELLA VISTA 49 CABRAMATTA 36 BELLEVUE HILL 14 CABRAMATTA WEST 38 BELMORE 19 CALREVILLE 52 BELROSE 32 CAMBRIDGE PARK 74 BERALA 28 CAMDEN 63 BERSHIRE PARK 71 CAMELLIA 32 BEVERLY HILLS 18 CAMMERAY 20 BEVERLY PARK 13 CAMPBELLTOWN 55 BEXLEY 14 CAMPERDOWN 14 BEXLEY NORTH 15 CAMPSIE 18 BIDWLL 65 CANADA BAY 24 BIGOLA 49 CANLEY HEIGHTS 38 BIGOLA PLATEAU 50 CANLEY VALE 37 BIRCHGROVE 18 CANTERBURY 17 BIRKENHEAD 19 CARAVAN HEAD 26 BIRRONG 28 CAREEL BAY 52 BLACKETT 64 CARLINGFORD 41 BLACKTOWN 62 CARLTON 14 BLAKEHURST 16 CARRAMAR 41 BONDI 14 CARRINGBAH 21 BONDI JUNCTION 12 CARTWRIGHT 38 BONNET BAY 27 CASTLE HILL 43 BONNYRIGG 40 CASTLECARG 24 BORONIA PARK 23 SCHEDULE OF DISTANCE (IN KMS) FROM PORT BOTANY CONTIANER TERMINAL CASTLECOVE 27 BOSSELY PARK 44 CASTLERAY 84 BOTANY 6 CASULA 38 BOXHILL 75 CATHERINE FIELDS 55 BREADKFAST POINT 20 CECIL PARK 53 BRIGHTON LE-SAND
    [Show full text]
  • Suburb Post Code Sheriff Office Office ID Aarons Pass 2850 Mudgee 638
    Suburb Post Code Sheriff Office Office ID Aarons Pass 2850 Mudgee 638 Abbotsbury 2176 Liverpool 581 Abbotsford 2046 Burwood 191 Abercrombie 2795 Bathurst 146 Abercrombie River 2795 Bathurst 146 Aberdare 2325 Muswellbrook 652 Aberdeen 2336 Muswellbrook 652 Aberfoyle 2350 Tamworth 814 Aberglasslyn 2320 Newcastle 690 Abermain 2326 Newcastle 690 Abernethy 2325 Muswellbrook 652 Abington 2350 Tamworth 814 Acacia Creek 2476 Lismore 574 Acacia Gardens 2763 Blacktown 163 Adaminaby 2629 Queanbeyan 752 Adamstown 2289 Newcastle 690 Adamstown Heights 2289 Newcastle 690 Adelong 2729 Wagga Wagga 864 Adjungbilly 2727 Wagga Wagga 864 Afterlee 2474 Lismore 574 Agnes Banks 2753 Richmond 908 Airds 2560 Campbelltown 202 Akolele 2546 Batemans Bay 142 Albert 2873 Parkes 722 Albion Park 2527 Wollongong 912 Albion Park Rail 2527 Wollongong 912 Albury 2640 Albury 103 Aldavilla 2440 Port Macquarie 740 Alectown 2870 Parkes 722 Alexandria 2015 Sydney City 120 Alexandria Mc 2015 Sydney City 120 Alfords Point 2234 Sutherland 798 Alfredtown 2650 Wagga Wagga 864 Alice 2469 Lismore 574 Alison 2259 Gosford 435 Alison 2420 Muswellbrook 652 Allambie Heights 2100 Sydney City 120 Allandale 2320 Muswellbrook 652 Allawah 2218 Sutherland 798 Alleena 2671 Parkes 722 Allgomera 2441 Coffs Harbour 302 Allworth 2425 Newcastle 690 Allynbrook 2311 Muswellbrook 652 Alma Park 2659 Albury 103 Alpine 2575 Wollongong 912 Alstonvale 2477 Lismore 574 Alstonville 2477 Lismore 574 Alumy Creek 2460 Grafton 441 Amaroo 2866 Orange 706 Ambarvale 2560 Campbelltown 202 Amosfield 4380 Tamworth 814 Anabranch
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 CLCNSW Directory.Pdf
    2018 Directory Community Compassion Justice What are Community Contents Legal Centres? What are Community Legal 2 Community legal centres (CLCs) are Centres? independent community organisations that provide access to legal services, What is Community Legal 3 with a particular focus on services Centres NSW? to disadvantaged and marginalised Using this Directory 4 people and communities and matters Frequently Asked Questions 6 in the public interest. (FAQs) Other Useful Services 8 CLCs have a distinctive role in the NSW community and legal sector by: Crisis Hotlines 10 • Providing general legal advice and Specialist Community Legal 12 assistance for socially and economically Centres disadvantaged people. This includes taking on strategic casework on matters that may Generalist Community Legal 26 affect many in the community; Centres • Addressing special areas or specific Suburb and Town Index 50 population groups through dedicated centres (e.g. tenancy, credit and debt, domestic and family violence); • Encouraging capacity building for people to develop skills for self-advocacy; and • Advocating for improved access to justice and more equitable laws and legal systems. There are currently 36 CLCs in NSW that are full members of the peak body, Community Legal Centres NSW (CLCNSW). CLCNSW also has several associate members who support the aims and objectives of the organisation. 2 2 Being members of this peak body means that CLCs are able to be accredited by the What is Community National Association of Community Legal Centres (NACLC), and bear the NACLC Legal Centres NSW? trademark. The NACLC trademark signifies that the organisations are committed to Community Legal Centre Service Standards, Risk Management Guidelines, community Community Legal Centres NSW involvement principles, and professional (CLCNSW) is the peak body standards for CLCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Central and Eastern Sydney PHN Catchment Area by Postcode
    Central and Eastern Sydney PHN catchment area by postcode Postcode Suburb(s) 2000 Sydney, The Rocks, Dawes Point, Haymarket, Millers Point, Barangaroo 2006 University of Sydney 2007 Ultimo 2008 Darlington, Chippendale 2009 Pyrmont 2010 Darlinghurst, Surry Hills 2011 Elizabeth Bay, Potts Point, Rushcutters Bay, Woolloomooloo 2015 Alexandria, Beaconsfield, Eveleigh 2016 Redfern 2017 Waterloo, Zetland 2018 Rosebery, Eastlakes 2019 Botany, Banksmeadow 2020 Mascot 2021 Paddington, Moore Park, Centennial Park 2022 Queens Park, Bondi Junction 2023 Bellevue Hill 2024 Waverley, Bronte 2025 Woollahra 2026 North Bondi, Bondi, Bondi Beach, Tamarama 2027 Point Piper, Darling Point, Edgecliff 2028 Double Bay 2029 Rose Bay 2030 Dover Heights, Watsons Bay, Vaucluse 2031 Randwick, Clovelly 2032 Kingsford, Daceyville 2033 Kensington 2034 Coogee, South Coogee 2035 Pagewood, Maroubra 2036 Chifley, Eastgardens, Hillsdale, La Perouse, Little Bay, Malabar, Port Botany, Phillip Bay, Matraville 2037 Forest Lodge, Glebe 2038 Annandale 2039 Rozelle 2040 Leichardt, Lilyfield 2041 Balmain, Birchgrove, Balmain East 2042 Newtown, Enmore 2043 Erskineville 2044 St Peters, Sydenham, Tempe 2045 Haberfield 2046 Wareemba, Canada Bay, Abbotsford, Five Dock, Chiswick, Russell Lea, Rodd Point 2047 Drummoyne 2048 Stanmore 2049 Petersham, Lewisham 2050 Camperdown, Missenden Rd 2052 UNSW 2129 Homebush West Once printed, this document is no longer controlled Central and Eastern Sydney PHN is a business division of EIS Health Limited ABN 68 603 815 818 Last updated July 2019 www.cesphn.org.au
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware
    Case 17-10805-LSS Doc 409 Filed 11/02/17 Page 1 of 268 IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF DELAWARE In re: Chapter 11 UNILIFE CORPORATION, et al., 1 Case No. 17-10805 (LSS) Debtors. (Jointly Administered) AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE STATE OF CALIFORNIA } } ss.: COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES } Darleen Sahagun, being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am employed by Rust Consulting/Omni Bankruptcy, located at 5955 DeSoto Avenue, Suite 100, Woodland Hills, CA 91367. I am over the age of eighteen years and am not a party to the above- captioned action. 2. On October 30, 2017, I caused to be served the: Notice/Debtors’ Motion for Approval of Settlement of Certain Claims with Present and Former Officers and Directors, and Certain Plaintiffs and Their Counsel [Docket No. 406] Notice of Filing of Corrected Exhibit [Docket No. 407] By causing true and correct copies to be served via first-class mail, postage pre-paid to the names and addresses of the parties listed as follows: I. Docket No. 406 and Docket No. 407 to those parties listed on the annexed Exhibit A, II. Docket No. 406 (Notice Only) to those parties on the annexed Exhibit B, Also, by causing true and correct copies to be served via email to the parties listed as follows: /// 1 The Debtors in these chapter 11 cases are the following entities (the last four digits of each Debtor’s respective federal tax identification number, if any, follow in parentheses): Unilife Corporation (9354), Unilife Medical Solutions, Inc. (9944), and Unilife Cross Farm LLC (3994).
    [Show full text]
  • Australian Bureau of Statistics
    Australian Bureau of Statistics 2016 Census - Cultural Diversity SSC (UR) by RELP - 3 Digit Level Counting: Persons, Place of Usual Residence Filters: Default Summation Persons, Place of Usual Residence RELP - 3 Digit Level Catholic Total SSC (UR) Aarons Pass 3 3 Abbotsbury 2384 2384 Abbotsford 2072 2072 Abercrombie 382 382 Abercrombie 0 0 Aberdare 454 454 Aberdeen (NSW) 584 584 Aberfoyle 49 49 Aberglasslyn 1625 1625 Abermain 442 442 Abernethy 47 47 Abington (NSW) 0 0 Acacia Creek 4 4 Acacia Gardens 1061 1061 Adaminaby 94 94 Adamstown 1606 1606 Adamstown 1253 1253 Adelong 269 269 Adjungbilly 31 31 Afterlee 7 7 Agnes Banks 328 328 Airds 630 630 Akolele 7 7 Albert 7 7 Albion Park 3737 3737 Albion Park Rail 1738 1738 Albury 1189 1189 Aldavilla 182 182 Alectown 27 27 Alexandria 1508 1508 Alfords Point 990 990 Alfredtown 27 27 Alice 0 0 Alison (Central 25 25 Alison (Dungog - 11 11 Allambie Heights 1970 1970 Allandale (NSW) 20 20 Allawah 971 971 Alleena 3 3 Allgomera 20 20 Allworth 35 35 Allynbrook 5 5 Alma Park 5 5 Alpine 30 30 Alstonvale 116 116 Alstonville 1177 1177 Alumy Creek 24 24 Amaroo (NSW) 15 15 Ambarvale 2105 2105 Amosfield 7 7 Anabranch North 0 0 Anabranch South 7 7 Anambah 4 4 Ando 17 17 Anembo 18 18 Angledale 30 30 Angledool 20 20 Anglers Reach 17 17 Angourie 42 42 Anna Bay 789 789 Annandale (NSW) 1976 1976 Annangrove 541 541 Appin (NSW) 841 841 Apple Tree Flat 11 11 Appleby 16 16 Appletree Flat 0 0 Apsley (NSW) 14 14 Arable 0 0 Arakoon 87 87 Araluen (NSW) 38 38 Aratula (NSW) 0 0 Arcadia (NSW) 403 403 Arcadia Vale 271 271 Ardglen
    [Show full text]