DOCSLIB.ORG

Museum Collections and Biodiversity Conservation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Museum Collections and Biodiversity Conservation Museum collections and biodiversity 01 conservation Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomic revisions Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology Taxonomy Biodiversity change Tissue sampling Population genetics Osteology DNA sampling Egg morphology Bat morphology Genomics Pathogens and systematics Morphology and genetics Field collections Species richness Conservation assessments Historical faunistics Mapping Colour measurement Ecology
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Monitoring Program for Biodiversity and Non-Indigenous Species in Egypt
    UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM MEDITERRANEAN ACTION PLAN REGIONAL ACTIVITY CENTRE FOR SPECIALLY PROTECTED AREAS National monitoring program for biodiversity and non-indigenous species in Egypt PROF. MOUSTAFA M. FOUDA April 2017 1 Study required and financed by: Regional Activity Centre for Specially Protected Areas Boulevard du Leader Yasser Arafat BP 337 1080 Tunis Cedex – Tunisie Responsible of the study: Mehdi Aissi, EcApMEDII Programme officer In charge of the study: Prof. Moustafa M. Fouda Mr. Mohamed Said Abdelwarith Mr. Mahmoud Fawzy Kamel Ministry of Environment, Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency (EEAA) With the participation of: Name, qualification and original institution of all the participants in the study (field mission or participation of national institutions) 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS page Acknowledgements 4 Preamble 5 Chapter 1: Introduction 9 Chapter 2: Institutional and regulatory aspects 40 Chapter 3: Scientific Aspects 49 Chapter 4: Development of monitoring program 59 Chapter 5: Existing Monitoring Program in Egypt 91 1. Monitoring program for habitat mapping 103 2. Marine MAMMALS monitoring program 109 3. Marine Turtles Monitoring Program 115 4. Monitoring Program for Seabirds 118 5. Non-Indigenous Species Monitoring Program 123 Chapter 6: Implementation / Operational Plan 131 Selected References 133 Annexes 143 3 AKNOWLEGEMENTS We would like to thank RAC/ SPA and EU for providing financial and technical assistances to prepare this monitoring programme. The preparation of this programme was the result of several contacts and interviews with many stakeholders from Government, research institutions, NGOs and fishermen. The author would like to express thanks to all for their support. In addition; we would like to acknowledge all participants who attended the workshop and represented the following institutions: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Scientific Support for Successful Implementation of the Natura 2000 Network
    Scientific support for successful implementation of the Natura 2000 network Focus Area B Guidance on the application of existing scientific approaches, methods, tools and knowledge for a better implementation of the Birds and Habitat Directives Environment FOCUS AREA B SCIENTIFIC SUPPORT FOR SUCCESSFUL i IMPLEMENTATION OF THE NATURA 2000 NETWORK Imprint Disclaimer This document has been prepared for the European Commis- sion. The information and views set out in the handbook are Citation those of the authors only and do not necessarily reflect the Van der Sluis, T. & Schmidt, A.M. (2021). E-BIND Handbook (Part B): Scientific support for successful official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not implementation of the Natura 2000 network. Wageningen Environmental Research/ Ecologic Institute /Milieu guarantee the accuracy of the data included. The Commission Ltd. Wageningen, The Netherlands. or any person acting on the Commission’s behalf cannot be held responsible for any use which may be made of the information Authors contained therein. Lead authors: This handbook has been prepared under a contract with the Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay (Monitoring of species and habitats within and beyond Natura 2000 sites) European Commission, in cooperation with relevant stakehold- Sander Mücher, Gerard Hazeu (Remote sensing techniques for the monitoring of Natura 2000 sites) ers. (EU Service contract Nr. 07.027740/2018/783031/ENV.D.3 Anne Schmidt, Chris van Swaay, Rene Henkens, Peter Verweij (Access to data and information) for evidence-based improvements in the Birds and Habitat Kris Decleer, Rienk-Jan Bijlsma (Guidance and tools for effective restoration measures for species and habitats) directives (BHD) implementation: systematic review and meta- Theo van der Sluis, Rob Jongman (Green Infrastructure and network coherence) analysis).
    [Show full text]
  • Children's Perceptions of Rainforest Biodiversity
    Children’s Perceptions of Rainforest Biodiversity: Which Animals Have the Lion’s Share of Environmental Awareness? Jake L. Snaddon1., Edgar C. Turner1,2.*, William A. Foster1 1 Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, United Kingdom, 2 Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire and Peterborough Wildlife Trusts, Bedford, Bedfordshire, United Kingdom Abstract Globally, natural ecosystems are being lost to agricultural land at an unprecedented rate. This land-use often results in significant reductions in abundance and diversity of the flora and fauna as well as alterations in their composition. Despite this, there is little public perception of which taxa are most important in terms of their total biomass, biodiversity or the ecosystem services they perform. Such awareness is important for conservation, as without appreciation of their value and conservation status, species are unlikely to receive adequate conservation protection. We investigated children’s perceptions of rainforest biodiversity by asking primary-age children, visiting the University Museum of Zoology, Cambridge to draw their ideal rainforest. By recording the frequency at which children drew different climatic, structural, vegetative and faunal components of the rainforest, we were able to quantify children’s understanding of a rainforest environment. We investigated children’s perceptions of rainforest biodiversity by comparing the relative numbers of the taxa drawn with the actual contributions made by these taxa to total rainforest biomass and global biodiversity. We found that children have a sophisticated view of the rainforest, incorporating many habitat features and a diverse range of animals. However, some taxa were over-represented (particularly mammals, birds and reptiles) and others under-represented (particularly insects and annelids) relative to their contribution to total biomass and species richness.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2018 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2018. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 50 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 25 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrew Gregg Horn for writing the status report on Common Nighthawk, Chordeiles minor, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Richard Elliot, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur L’engoulevent d’Amérique (Chordeiles minor) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Common Nighthawk, copyright by Ronnie d'Entremont. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018. Catalogue No. CW69-14/515-2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-27850-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2018 Common name Common Nighthawk Scientific name Chordeiles minor Status Special Concern Reason for designation This aerial insectivore is a widespread breeding bird across southern and boreal Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Revision and Updating of the Strategic Plan: Possible Outline and Elements of the New Strategic Plan from the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD)
    Revision and updating of the strategic plan: possible outline and elements of the new strategic plan from the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) A response by Wildlife and Countryside Link Wildlife and Countryside Link (Link) brings together 35 voluntary organisations concerned with the conservation and protection of wildlife and the countryside. Our members practise and advocate environmentally sensitive land management, and encourage respect for and enjoyment of natural landscapes and features, the historic and marine environment and biodiversity. Taken together our members have the support of over 8 million people in the UK and manage over 690,000 hectares of land. This document is supported by the following 15 organisations; • Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Trust • Badger Trust • Bat Conservation Trust • Buglife – The Invertebrate Conservation Trust • Butterfly Conservation • Campaign to Protect Rural England • Friends of the Earth England • The Grasslands Trust • The Mammal Society • Marine Conservation Society • Plantlife International • Royal Society for the Protection of Birds • Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust • The Wildlife Trusts • Woodland Trust 1. Overview Link agrees that the new CBD strategic plan should provide a framework for establishing national targets. In the UK, we should seek to ensure that the targets in the strategic plan are robust and challenging enough to drive cross-sectoral delivery and push us on to achieving the ultimate aims of halting and reversing the biodiversity loss we continue to observe. We support the suggested strategic plan title “Sustaining Life on Earth” since this accurately places biodiversity at the heart of sustainable living. Our comments relate to the position statement developed by Link throughout 2009 (Annex1) in respect of a post-2010 biodiversity target and possible sub-targets.
    [Show full text]
  • Dr Richard M. Smith, Buglife, First Floor, 90 Bridge Street, Peterborough, PE1 1DY 2
    EIDCF004 - revised Submit by 12 March 2010 DARWIN INITIATIVE APPLICATION FOR OVERSEAS TERRITORIES CHALLENGE FUND: Round 17 Please read the Guidance Notes before completing this form. 1. Name, postal address and contact details of applicant organisation and main individual: (notification of results will be by email to this individual) Dr Richard M. Smith, Buglife, First Floor, 90 Bridge Street, Peterborough, PE1 1DY 2. Working title/name of the proposed resulting Darwin project (not exceeding 10 words): Laying the foundations for invertebrate conservation on St Helena. 3. Proposed UKOT(s) involved (in Challenge Other collaborating country/ies (including Fund award): metropolitan UK if appropriate) to be involved St Helena in the proposed resultant project: 4. Principals in Challenge Fund work (a) Please give the details of the main individuals (max 2) from the applicant organisation who will be directly involved in the Challenge Fund award. CVs must be enclosed (max 2 pages each). Details Main individual 2nd individual Surname Smith Key Forename(s) Richard Michael Roger Post held UKOTs Project Officer Entomological Consultant Department Conservation Projects n/a Telephone Email (b) Prospective collaborating partners relevant to the Challenge Fund award. Please provide details below, plus letters of support. (These letters should express their intention to collaborate, their contribution to the Challenge Fund activity, their endorsement of the proposed partnership, and the expect contribution of the proposed resultant Darwin project to the conservation of the biodiversity of the relevant UKOT(s).) Details Main project partner Other partners Organisation St Helena National Trust St Helena Government (SHNT) (Agriculture & Natural Resources Dept., ANRD) Function/ Purpose of The SHNT is an NGO responsible The ANRD delivers the island’s Organisation for the protection, enhancement Environmental Conservation and promotion of St Helena’s programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Annex. Acronyms and Glossary of Terms
    The State of Natural Resources Report (SoNaRR): Assessment of the Sustainable Management of Natural Resources. Annex. Acronyms and Glossary of terms Natural Resources Wales Final Report Date www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk About Natural Resources Wales We look after Wales’ environment so that it can look after nature, people and the economy. Our air, land, water, wildlife, plants and soil – our natural resources - provide us with our basic needs, including food, energy, health and enjoyment. When cared for in the right way, they can help us to reduce flooding, improve air quality and provide materials for construction. They also provide a home for some rare and beautiful wildlife and iconic landscapes we can enjoy and which boost the economy. But they are coming under increasing pressure – from climate change, from a growing population and the need for energy production. We aim to find better solutions to these challenges and create a more successful, healthy and resilient Wales. www.naturalresourceswales.gov.uk Evidence at Natural Resources Wales Natural Resources Wales is an evidence based organisation. We seek to ensure that our strategy, decisions, operations and advice to Welsh Government and others are underpinned by sound and quality-assured evidence. We recognise that it is critically important to have a good understanding of our changing environment. We will realise this vision by: Maintaining and developing the technical specialist skills of our staff; Securing our data and information; Having a well resourced proactive programme of evidence work; Continuing to review and add to our evidence to ensure it is fit for the challenges facing us; and Communicating our evidence in an open and transparent way.
    [Show full text]
  • RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE for CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where Science Comes to Life
    RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE RSPB CENTRE FOR CONSERVATION SCIENCE Where science comes to life Contents Knowing 2 Introducing the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science and an explanation of how and why the RSPB does science. A decade of science at the RSPB 9 A selection of ten case studies of great science from the RSPB over the last decade: 01 Species monitoring and the State of Nature 02 Farmland biodiversity and wildlife-friendly farming schemes 03 Conservation science in the uplands 04 Pinewood ecology and management 05 Predation and lowland breeding wading birds 06 Persecution of raptors 07 Seabird tracking 08 Saving the critically endangered sociable lapwing 09 Saving South Asia's vultures from extinction 10 RSPB science supports global site-based conservation Spotlight on our experts 51 Meet some of the team and find out what it is like to be a conservation scientist at the RSPB. Funding and partnerships 63 List of funders, partners and PhD students whom we have worked with over the last decade. Chris Gomersall (rspb-images.com) Conservation rooted in know ledge Introduction from Dr David W. Gibbons Welcome to the RSPB Centre for Conservation The Centre does not have a single, physical Head of RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Science. This new initiative, launched in location. Our scientists will continue to work from February 2014, will showcase, promote and a range of RSPB’s addresses, be that at our UK build the RSPB’s scientific programme, helping HQ in Sandy, at RSPB Scotland’s HQ in Edinburgh, us to discover solutions to 21st century or at a range of other addresses in the UK and conservation problems.
    [Show full text]
  • The IUCN Red List of Threatened Speciestm
    Species 2014 Annual ReportSpecies the Species of 2014 Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme Species ISSUE 56 2014 Annual Report of the Species Survival Commission and the Global Species Programme • 2014 Spotlight on High-level Interventions IUCN SSC • IUCN Red List at 50 • Specialist Group Reports Ethiopian Wolf (Canis simensis), Endangered. © Martin Harvey Muhammad Yazid Muhammad © Amazing Species: Bleeding Toad The Bleeding Toad, Leptophryne cruentata, is listed as Critically Endangered on The IUCN Red List of Threatened SpeciesTM. It is endemic to West Java, Indonesia, specifically around Mount Gede, Mount Pangaro and south of Sukabumi. The Bleeding Toad’s scientific name, cruentata, is from the Latin word meaning “bleeding” because of the frog’s overall reddish-purple appearance and blood-red and yellow marbling on its back. Geographical range The population declined drastically after the eruption of Mount Galunggung in 1987. It is Knowledge believed that other declining factors may be habitat alteration, loss, and fragmentation. Experts Although the lethal chytrid fungus, responsible for devastating declines (and possible Get Involved extinctions) in amphibian populations globally, has not been recorded in this area, the sudden decline in a creekside population is reminiscent of declines in similar amphibian species due to the presence of this pathogen. Only one individual Bleeding Toad was sighted from 1990 to 2003. Part of the range of Bleeding Toad is located in Gunung Gede Pangrango National Park. Future conservation actions should include population surveys and possible captive breeding plans. The production of the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species™ is made possible through the IUCN Red List Partnership.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan's Progress
    39 Pakistan's Progress By Guy Mountfort In the short space of twelve months Pakistan has laid wide-ranging plans for conserving her wildlife, hitherto completely neglected. On the recommenda- tion of two World Wildlife Fund expeditions, led by Guy Mountfort, an international WWF trustee, two national parks and several reserves are being created which should give Pakistan a last chance to save the tiger, the snow leopard and several other seriously threatened mammals and birds. NTIL very recently wildlife conservation in Pakistan was non- U existent; today the situation is extremely encouraging. Under the direction of President Ayub Khan, most of the recommendations in the report of the 1967 World Wildlife Fund expedition have already been implemented, and a number of the proposed new wildlife reserves are now in being. A wildlife committee (in effect a Government Commission) has been set up under the distinguished chairmanship of Mr. M. M. Ahmad, Deputy Chairman of the Central Government Planning Commission, to create a permanent administrative framework for the conservation and management of wildlife and habitats, and two sub-committees are studying technical, educational, legal and administrative requirements. After submitting detailed reports and recommendations to the President in the spring of 1970, the committee will be replaced by a permanent wildlife advisory body to co-ordinate future planning. Responsibility for the management of wildlife resources has been given to the Department of Forests. Forest Officers are to be given special train- ing in wildlife ecology and management, and the first trainees have just completed courses in the United States. Meanwhile, a post-graduate curriculum in wildlife management is in preparation at the Forest Institute at Peshawar, to which Major Ian Grimwood has been seconded by FAO.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals
    CMS/Raptors/MoS1/Doc.12.2/Annex III Convention on the Conservation of Migratory Species of Wild Animals Secretariat provided by the United Nations Environment Programme MEETING TO CONCLUDE THE MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY BIRDS OF PREY IN AFRICA AND EURASIA UNDER THE CONVENTION ON MIGRATORY SPECIES (CMS) Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, 20-22 October 2008 TEMPLATE1 FOR IN-COUNTRY REPORT RELATING TO BASIC KEY ACTIONS AT NATIONAL LEVEL TO IMPLEMENT THE ACTION PLAN 1. GENERAL INFORMATION 1.1. Country: Pakistan 1.2. Agency or institution that has been primarily responsible for the preparation of this Forestry Wing, Ministry of Climate Change, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad 1.3. Provisional Focal Point responsible for Migratory Birds of Prey in Africa and Eurasia: Muhammad Samar Hussain Khan (Mr.) Assistant Secretary (Wildlife) Forestry Wing, Ministry of Climate Change, Building, 14-D, Second Floor, Markaz F-8 Islamabad, Pakistan Tel: 0092-51-9262848 Fax: 0092-51-9262270 Email: [email protected] 1.4. Date submitted: 14th November 2012 1.5. Period covered by the report: November 2008 to date 1.6. List of other agencies or NGOs that have provided input to this report: Provincial/territorial wildlife departments, Zoological Survey Department. 1 st Unsolicited submission to the ICU of the Raptors MoU in advance of the 1 Meeting of Signatories. 2. Improvement of legal protection: 2.1. In general, please comment on the fact that (a) the legislation of your country protects all migratory birds of prey in principle (b) the legislation is implemented on-the-ground Wildlife management and conservation in Pakistan, is a provincial subject.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrating Wildlife Conservation with Community -Based Development in Northern Areas Pakistan
    University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1999 Integrating wildlife conservation with community -based development in Northern Areas Pakistan Amjad Tahir Virk The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Virk, Amjad Tahir, "Integrating wildlife conservation with community -based development in Northern Areas Pakistan" (1999). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 10583. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/10583 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the microfilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleedthrough, substandard margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand comer and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps.
    [Show full text]