DOCSLIB.ORG

Spring Public Workshops

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Spring Public Workshops BELTLINE CORRIDOR ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY PUBLIC AND C O M M I T T E E WORKSHOPS A p r i l - Ju n e 2009 Prepared for: Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority and Atlanta BeltLine, Inc. Prepared by: AECOM/JJG Joint Venture Atlanta, GA July 2009 General Planning Consultant Services RFP P5413 Contract No. 200703566 Work Order No. 2008-07 General Planning Consultant Services Public and Committee Workshops – April – June 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Table of Contents 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 PUBLIC WORKSHOPS ............................................................................................ 1-1 1.2 ATLANTA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY STAFF AND JOINT TECHNICAL / STAKEHOLDER ADVISORY COMMITTEE WORKSHOPS ................................... 1-1 1.3 PUBLIC & COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION PRESENTATIONS ............................. 1-2 1.4 SUMMARY OF KEY COMMENTS AND ISSUES RAISED ..................................... 1-2 1.5 NEXT STEPS: ALTERNATIVES DEVELOPMENT AND SCREENING................. 1-3 List of Table Table 1-1: Key Comments – All Workshops ................................................................................. 1-4 Appendix Appendix A: Meeting Notes ..................................................................................................... A-1.2-1 Appendix B: Presentation Notes ........................................................................................... A-1.2-37 BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study i June 2009 General Planning Consultant Services Public and Committee Workshops – April – June 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The purpose of this report is to summarize the comments and suggestions received during a series of workshops and presentations held in April, May and June 2009 as part of the Bel- tLine Corridor Environmental Study. The workshops and presentations provided an opportu- nity for the project stakeholders, technical advisors, agency staff and the public to gain great- er understanding of the types of improvements proposed for the BeltLine. More than 600 in- dividuals were involved in all of the outreach activities. These activities also provided an op- portunity for the participants to assist in identifying the project alignment, station location and service type options for feasibility screening and evaluation as part of the Tier 1 Environmen- tal Impact Statement that is being prepared for the project. 1.1 Public Workshops A series of public workshops was held in each of the five BeltLine Study Group areas be- tween April 13, 2009 and May 4, 2009 to engage the public in identifying potential transit and trail alternatives to be considered for the project. The workshops were promoted throughout the study area to involve the public; some of whom were previously involved in various Bel- tLine planning efforts, through MARTA and Atlanta BeltLine Inc.‘s (ABI‘s) outreach methods. Others participated because of a host of outreach strategies designed to reach community, transit and trail users and stakeholders of the future transit and trails project. These activities resulted in small group hands-on workshops attended by approximately 105 individuals. The first portion of each of the public workshops provided an opportunity for the participants to view a series of display boards and a continuous video that described the various transit and trails improvement options identified in previous studies for the BeltLine. This was fol- lowed by a short presentation that described the overall study process, results of previous studies and the purpose of the workshop. After the presentation, the participants were asked to break into smaller discussion groups for an interactive exercise focused on identifying po- tential modifications or additions to the alternative service types, alignments and station loca- tions previously identified for the BeltLine project. Each breakout group included a staff facili- tator to lead the discussion, access to an interactive video screen that displayed maps of the proposed project alignment and stations, and a staff person to document the comments and suggestions offered by the group. Following the break-out session, a representative for each group presented a short summary regarding the key points raised by their group. 1.2 Atlanta Development Authority Staff and Joint Technical / Stakeholder Advisory Committee Workshops A project workshop was also held on May 28, 2009 to provide an opportunity for the At- lanta Development Authority (ADA) staff and Atlanta‘s Economic Development Sub- Cabinet to review and comment on the alternatives to be considered for the BeltLine project. A joint Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Stakeholder Advisory Commit- tee (SAC) workshop was held on June 2, 2009. The TAC is composed of representa- tives of organizations and agencies that have a specific interest and/or responsibility in the BeltLine Corridor or have shown special interest in the redevelopment of the corridor. The SAC is composed of representatives from a variety of area organiza- BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study 1-1 June 2009 General Planning Consultant Services Public and Committee Workshops – April – June 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY tions, including MARTA‘s network of citizen and business organizations, faith-based organizations, community-based organizations and advocacy groups. The SAC pro- vides input and comments on study findings, and plays a key role in generating par- ticipation from the public at large. Both the ADA and TAC/SAC workshops followed a format that was similar to the public workshops including a brief presentation and an interactive break-out group exercise focused on soliciting comments and sugges- tions relative to the project alignments, station locations and service types being considered for the BeltLine project. 1.3 Public & Community Organization Presentations To gain additional feedback from the public, the public outreach comment period was ex- tended to June 12, 2009. Twelve public and community organization presentations were held for additional opportunities to engage the public in identifying potential transit and trail al- ternatives. Through intensified efforts to engage the public in identifying opportunities and impacts for the transit and trail design, the message was taken to community forums already in place, to libraries, and to food courts in an office complex and mall. These activities re- sulted in presentations attended by approximately 516 individuals. At the presentations and one-on-one engagements, individuals were provided an oppor- tunity to view a series of display boards that described the study process, the types of service considered, the environmental project study goals, the overall Beltline concept and the project study area map. In this informal context, individuals were given a brief overview of the Beltline study and asked to give their comments. Staff documented the comments and suggestions offered. 1.4 Summary of Key Comments and Issues Raised Each of the comments, suggestions and issues of concern expressed by the workshop par- ticipants during the interactive group exercise was documented by a staff recorder on large tablets at each of the break-out discussion tables. This information was subsequently com- piled for each of the workshops and is presented in the Appendix of this report along with the compiled information from the public/community presentations. This information will be used to determine potential modifications to the initial alternatives for the BeltLine and for the identi- fication of additional alternative alignments, stations and service types for further study. Common themes heard at the workshops included the following: Local service for the BeltLine transit, providing the maximum number of access points to neighborhood stations Transit and trail alignments should run parallel to each other to the maximum extent possible Transit alignment should connect to MARTA heavy rail stations as well as the Peach- tree Street Car alignment BeltLine transit and trail design should include pedestrian access that is well de- signed and accommodates special transportation needs (i.e. ADA compliance and strollers) BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study 1-2 June 2009 General Planning Consultant Services Public and Committee Workshops – April – June 2009 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY All transit and trail design should include provisions for ensuring for the safety of us- ers Table 1-1 on the following pages summarizes some of the key comments and suggestions raised at the workshops and public/community presentations that specifically relate to the transit service types, transit and trail alignments and transit station locations under considera- tion for the BeltLine project. The table is presented in a matrix format and identifies the key comments organized by study area zone and whether they address service type, alignment, station location or trails related issues. 1.5 Next Steps: Alternatives Development and Screening The information included in Table1-1 and the summaries of workshop and presentation results as shown in the Appendix of this document will be used to modify initial BeltLine project alternatives and identify additional options for further consideration and screen- ing. These alternatives could potentially have different transit/trail alignments for por- tions of the BeltLine, different station location configurations, and may be designed to accommodate different
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT
    Proposed Program of High Capacity Transit Improvements City of Atlanta DRAFT Estimated Capital Cost (Base Year in Estimated O&M Cost (Base Year in Millions) Millions) Project Description Total Miles Local Federal O&M Cost Over 20 Total Capital Cost Annual O&M Cost Share Share Years Two (2) miles of heavy rail transit (HRT) from HE Holmes station to a I‐20 West Heavy Rail Transit 2 $250.0 $250.0 $500.0 $13.0 $312.0 new station at MLK Jr Dr and I‐285 Seven (7) miles of BRT from the Atlanta Metropolitan State College Northside Drive Bus Rapid Transit (south of I‐20) to a new regional bus system transfer point at I‐75 7 $40.0 N/A $40.0 $7.0 $168.0 north Clifton Light Rail Four (4) miles of grade separated light rail transit (LRT) service from 4 $600.0 $600.0 $1,200.0 $10.0 $240.0 Contingent Multi‐ Transit* Lindbergh station to a new station at Emory Rollins Jurisdicitional Projects I‐20 East Bus Rapid Three (3) miles of bus rapid transit (BRT) service from Five Points to 3 $28.0 $12.0 $40.0 $3.0 $72.0 Transit* Moreland Ave with two (2) new stops and one new station Atlanta BeltLine Twenty‐two (22) miles of bi‐directional at‐grade light rail transit (LRT) 22 $830 $830 $1,660 $44.0 $1,056.0 Central Loop service along the Atlanta BeltLine corridor Over three (3) miles of bi‐directional in‐street running light rail transit Irwin – AUC Line (LRT) service along Fair St/MLK Jr Dr/Luckie St/Auburn 3.4 $153 $153 $306.00 $7.0 $168.0 Ave/Edgewood Ave/Irwin St Over two (2) miles of in‐street bi‐directional running light rail transit Downtown – Capitol
    [Show full text]
  • REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary
    REGIONAL RESOURCE PLAN Contents Executive Summary ................................................................5 Summary of Resources ...........................................................6 Regionally Important Resources Map ................................12 Introduction ...........................................................................13 Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value .................21 Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ..................................48 Areas of Scenic and Agricultural Value ..............................79 Appendix Cover Photo: Sope Creek Ruins - Chattahoochee River National Recreation Area/ Credit: ARC Tables Table 1: Regionally Important Resources Value Matrix ..19 Table 2: Regionally Important Resources Vulnerability Matrix ......................................................................................20 Table 3: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ...........46 Table 4: General Policies and Protection Measures for Areas of Conservation and Recreational Value ................47 Table 5: National Register of Historic Places Districts Listed by County ....................................................................54 Table 6: National Register of Historic Places Individually Listed by County ....................................................................57 Table 7: Guidance for Appropriate Development Practices for Areas of Historic and Cultural Value ............................77 Table 8: General Policies
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E - Public Involvement
    Appendix E - Public Involvement Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study E April 2012 Page Left Intentionally Blank Atlanta BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study April 2012 Appendix E – Public Participation 1.1 Public Participation Plan Summary The objective of the public participation program is to invite and encourage the public to learn about and become involved in the BeltLine Corridor Environmental Study. The development of the Public Involvement and Agency Coordination Plan (PIAC) ensured ongoing public involvement throughout the course of the project using a variety of tools and techniques. The PIAC Plan describes how the public, local and state agencies, and decision-makers will take part in the identification, development, and implementation of the proposed transit and multi-use trails system in the BeltLine Corridor. Key objectives of the public involvement efforts are to facilitate public understanding, to solicit input on the BeltLine Corridor transit and trails alternatives, and to identify potential consequences of alternative courses of action relative to the transportation, social, environmental and economic context. Use of the varying public involvement techniques outlined in the PIAC Plan invited and encouraged the public, federal, state, and local agencies the opportunity to review and comment on key project milestone decisions and to provide MARTA and ABI with the benefit of public insight throughout the project planning and development process. The PIAC Plan was developed in accordance with Section 6002 of Public Law 104-59 “Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users” (SAFETEA-LU), which mandates the development of a coordination plan for all projects for which an EIS is prepared under NEPA.
    [Show full text]
  • Raise the Curtain
    JAN-FEB 2016 THEAtlanta OFFICIAL VISITORS GUIDE OF AtLANTA CoNVENTI ON &Now VISITORS BUREAU ATLANTA.NET RAISE THE CURTAIN THE NEW YEAR USHERS IN EXCITING NEW ADDITIONS TO SOME OF AtLANTA’S FAVORITE ATTRACTIONS INCLUDING THE WORLDS OF PUPPETRY MUSEUM AT CENTER FOR PUPPETRY ARTS. B ARGAIN BITES SEE PAGE 24 V ALENTINE’S DAY GIFT GUIDE SEE PAGE 32 SOP RTS CENTRAL SEE PAGE 36 ATLANTA’S MUST-SEA ATTRACTION. In 2015, Georgia Aquarium won the TripAdvisor Travelers’ Choice award as the #1 aquarium in the U.S. Don’t miss this amazing attraction while you’re here in Atlanta. For one low price, you’ll see all the exhibits and shows, and you’ll get a special discount when you book online. Plan your visit today at GeorgiaAquarium.org | 404.581.4000 | Georgia Aquarium is a not-for-profit organization, inspiring awareness and conservation of aquatic animals. F ATLANTA JANUARY-FEBRUARY 2016 O CONTENTS en’s museum DR D CHIL ENE OP E Y R NEWL THE 6 CALENDAR 36 SPORTS OF EVENTS SPORTS CENTRAL 14 Our hottest picks for Start the year with NASCAR, January and February’s basketball and more. what’S new events 38 ARC AROUND 11 INSIDER INFO THE PARK AT our Tips, conventions, discounts Centennial Olympic Park on tickets and visitor anchors a walkable ring of ATTRACTIONS information booth locations. some of the city’s best- It’s all here. known attractions. Think you’ve already seen most of the city’s top visitor 12 NEIGHBORHOODS 39 RESOURCE Explore our neighborhoods GUIDE venues? Update your bucket and find the perfect fit for Attractions, restaurants, list with these new and improved your interests, plus special venues, services and events in each ’hood.
    [Show full text]
  • Soohueyyap Capstone.Pdf (6.846Mb)
    School of City & Regional Planning COLLEGE OF DESIGN A Text-Mining and GIS Approach to Understanding Transit Customer Satisfaction Soo Huey Yap MS-GIST Capstone Project July 24, 2020 1 CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Transit Performance Evaluation……………………………………………………………………………….. 3 1.2 Using Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis to Measure Customer Satisfaction………… 5 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1 Study Site and Transit Authority……………………………………………………………………………….. 9 2.2 Description of Data…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 9 2.3 Text-Mining and Sentiment Analysis 2.3.1 Data Preparation……………………………………………………………………………………….. 11 2.3.2 Determining Most Frequent Words…………………………………………………………… 12 2.3.3 Sentiment Analysis……………………………………………………………………………………. 13 2.4 Open-Source Visualization and Mapping………………………………………………………………… 14 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Determining Most Frequent Words………………………………………………………………………… 16 3.2 Sentiment Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 17 3.3 Location-based Analysis…………………………………………………………………………………………. 19 4. CHALLENGES AND FUTURE WORK……………………………………………………………………………………. 24 5. CONCLUSION………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….… 25 6. REFERENCES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 26 7. APPENDICES……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 29 Appendix 1: Final Python Script for Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 2: Results from 1st Round Data Cleaning and Frequent Words Analysis Appendix 3: Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using the NLTK Vader Module Python Script for Sentiment Analysis using TextBlob Appendix 4:
    [Show full text]
  • City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP)
    City of Atlanta 2016-2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Community Work Program (CWP) Prepared By: Department of Planning and Community Development 55 Trinity Avenue Atlanta, Georgia 30303 www.atlantaga.gov DRAFT JUNE 2015 Page is left blank intentionally for document formatting City of Atlanta 2016‐2020 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) and Community Work Program (CWP) June 2015 City of Atlanta Department of Planning and Community Development Office of Planning 55 Trinity Avenue Suite 3350 Atlanta, GA 30303 http://www.atlantaga.gov/indeex.aspx?page=391 Online City Projects Database: http:gis.atlantaga.gov/apps/cityprojects/ Mayor The Honorable M. Kasim Reed City Council Ceasar C. Mitchell, Council President Carla Smith Kwanza Hall Ivory Lee Young, Jr. Council District 1 Council District 2 Council District 3 Cleta Winslow Natalyn Mosby Archibong Alex Wan Council District 4 Council District 5 Council District 6 Howard Shook Yolanda Adreaan Felicia A. Moore Council District 7 Council District 8 Council District 9 C.T. Martin Keisha Bottoms Joyce Sheperd Council District 10 Council District 11 Council District 12 Michael Julian Bond Mary Norwood Andre Dickens Post 1 At Large Post 2 At Large Post 3 At Large Department of Planning and Community Development Terri M. Lee, Deputy Commissioner Charletta Wilson Jacks, Director, Office of Planning Project Staff Jessica Lavandier, Assistant Director, Strategic Planning Rodney Milton, Principal Planner Lenise Lyons, Urban Planner Capital Improvements Program Sub‐Cabinet Members Atlanta BeltLine,
    [Show full text]
  • Decatur's Transportation Network, 2007
    3 • Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 CHAPTER • 3 Decatur’s Transportation Network, 2007 othing speaks louder of a city’s transportation system than how its residents use it. A public survey conducted as part of the CTP revealed that sixty-seven N percent of commuters drive alone to get to work or school. Over 20 percent of commuters in Decatur either walk, bike or take transit. Even more interesting, 79 percent of residents reported having walked or ridden a bike to downtown Decatur. Additionally, the majority of residents feel that it is easy to get around the City. These results indicate a system that already provides a lot of choice for travelers. The following sections detail the extent of these choices, i.e. the facilities that make up the existing Decatur transportation network. The CTP uses this snapshot of how Decatur gets around in 2007 to recommend how the City can build upon its existing strengths to realize its vision of a healthy and well-connected community. Existing Street Network Streets are where it all comes together for travel in and through Decatur. The streets and their edges provide places for people to walk, bicycle and travel in buses and other vehicles. Compared with the MARTA rail system and off-road paths and greenways, the street system in Decatur accommodates the majority of travel and is detailed below. Roadway Classification in Decatur In 1974, the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) published the manual Highway Functional Classification - Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. The manual was revised in 1989 and forms the basis of this roadway classification inventory.
    [Show full text]
  • LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report
    LAST MILE CONNECTIVITY STUDY Draft Report Prepared for Prepared by In collaboration with Last Mile Connectivity Study | DRAFT REPORT February 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................................ 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................... 4 2. Background ...................................................................................................................................................... 8 A. Defining Last Mile Connectivity ....................................................................................................................... 8 B. Study Area ........................................................................................................................................................... 8 3. Study Process/Methodology ........................................................................................................................ 11 A. Prior Plans and Studies .....................................................................................................................................11 B. Project List ..........................................................................................................................................................11 C. Mapping Existing Facilities/Services and Previously Planned/Programmed Projects
    [Show full text]
  • Leasing-Brochure-Midtown-Union.Pdf
    MIDTOWN UNIONSM BREATHES FRESH LIFE INTO URBAN DEVELOPMENT, uniquely connecting people, places and the Winner of the Atlanta arts with new paths. Arts Center Way, our Business Chronicle signature tree-lined, pedestrian-friendly 2019 Mixed Use thoroughfare, extends through the property Deal of the Year leading to and from specialty shops, restaurants, green office space, modern apartment homes, and a luxury boutique hotel. Getting here comes naturally, with easy access from Peachtree Street, I-75/85 and MARTA, or by car, on bicycle or on foot. WATCH THE VIDEO 2 // OVERVIEW ATLANTA — CENTER OF THE SOUTHEAST 6 MILLION population Hartsfield-Jackson International Airport is the #1 BUSIEST AIRPORT in the world since 1998 WITH 96 MILLION passengers annually 5 Fortune 500 global headquarters located in the metro area, ranking #4 IN THE U.S. Home to 14 FORTUNE 500 COMPANIES 3 // ATLANTA MARKET MIDTOWN AT A GLANCE 6.1 MILLION visitors annually 3,000 CULTURAL EVENTS annually and the largest concentration of cultural attractions in the Southeast 150+ RESTAURANTS AND SHOPPING EXPERIENCES 1.4 MILLION annual visitors to the Woodruff Arts Center 70,000 DAYTIME WORKERS and 25% of the city’s tech jobs 3 MARTA RAIL STATIONS 5 NOTABLE INSTITUTIONS in close proximity: Georgia Tech, Emory, SCAD, Georgia State University, and Atlanta University Center 2X THE NATIONAL AVERAGE in job growth 185 ACRES of recreation and fitness at Piedmont Park 4 // MIDTOWN MARKET A PLACE TO GROW YOUR BUSINESS 77% of residents within a 1 mile radius of Midtown UnionSM hold a The competition for talent is higher than ever, and BACHELOR’S a centrally located, well-designed office is a key DEGREE or higher recruitment tool to attract and retain the brightest minds in the Southeast.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Public Schools Middle Schools Zones 2008 Neighborhoods
    City of Atlanta A t l a n t a P u b l i c S c h o o l s M i d d l e S c h o o l s Z o n e s 2 0 0 8 N e i g h b o r h o o d s A R K S R E C R R D N O E J W D E R D S Y E D T T NOR S T TH A D B K A WA T Y L D N P D L E W R W R E L L U M D A H D F FRANK A LIN RD C A R T H R P D O L V L C T H D R R A D E R Y E D H C Y ST LA T O R K Y B R Y T E T E H O T T R G L I N E C D D C A E R R N R R R O O O D K C F N I S T B D L IC L N T B R U T O Y W M R T D S R B A V Y S Y M S L Y Y W Y R I P H L N W R 0 Sandy Springs N D I Y W M N O R A C V L M U A I S W S K D Y O T L R L 0 K D S H L B A A O E R E R T E N RN RD I 4 RHO R DE T W A D EAST POW A Y O L ST A N P Y W E L IC L M T O P L L O P N N S A K I F C N E E L N D R T T S G D R S R DR O J S D T S H E A R R R D IG I E L E D R D AR T D AT T E EY CA T R A ROLWOOD LN I RIV R R L S D T L T H S P L GELO C R ST G A AN E A A R V W R PRING L A D N S S E H N D Chamblee R TWI ED E C M I R W DEN H D ST O A D T G N O S L L G S E R N T R U D M W T D E L A D B A A E O R D N R E D T D S L R O L R R H T LUB C D R PINE FOREST RD E R E T M C I C W R T PARAN PW A R G R R N E U A M P Y D O N O E L H A R W M Y L C H D HIT R W T E P D R D Y W B O S LE A U WO L AL T D K N V R E B E T R UC MEADOWBROOK DR RE U R T O IA C R SWIMS VA ALLEN M L PW E A C L LLEY DR N E I C M O R T G D N ARM SOMERSET DR TROY O CHASTAI W R L ON COC D DR U Y HRAN DR T F WES D A N N R R L D O E W HAR W ER D RIS V T B V V A N E VAL R L HSID D LEY GREEN DR A U L M T I C L A L R E O CT C E E E S O K E H N C C W N Y R ID IE K I T U S K C R T R H S G Y A A N ME A I O R D R N D M L U E R P E S L D S O L A Mt.
    [Show full text]
  • Tour of Homes December 10 and 11
    ADMITADMIT ONEONE 2011 VIRGINIA-HIGHLAND TOUR OF HOMES DECEMBER 10 AND 11 PRESENTED BY KEN COVERS • SUSAN SCHLITTLER • MICHAEL GADDY ATKINS PARK GOIN’ COASTAL, HD1 BELLA CUCINA PORTA VIA HOMES for the EL TACO/ LA TAVOLA D.B.A. BBQ, GENKI HOLIDAYS WHOLE FOODS ARCHITECTURE FOOD TASTINGS HOLIDAY CHEER www.vahitourofhomes.org THANKS TO ALL OF OUR SPONSORS FOR YOUR GENEROUS SUPPORT Y Title Sponsors Z Y Benefactor Sponsors Z Bennett Design Holland Renovation Copper Sky Renovations Jam’n Design KEN COVERS Home Rebuilders Piedmont Bark SUSAN SCHLITTLER Distinctive Appliance YWCA of Greater Atlanta MICHAEL GADDY Y Supporting Sponsors Z Dencity Karen Page - Highland Investment Karen Hott Interiors Rapid Signs Y Neighborhood Sponsors Z The Bigger Half - Career, Business and Life Coaching Y Major Sponsors Z Y Special thanks to our very gracious homeowners, Z restaurants, house captains, and volunteers! Y 2011 Tour of Homes Committee Z IA-HIGH IN L G A R N I V D creative crop Cindy Kaufman, Media and Public Relations b e a u rbec Ann Guy and Mandi Robertson, Sponsorship Sales Co-Chairs Kevin Cronin, Jeff Payne, Judith Stogner, Benedetta Johnson, Sponsorship Eleanor Barrineau, Volunteers Charlie LeFort, Restaurants Additional Credits: Phuong Nguyen, Creative Crop, Print and Website Design Sammy Boykin, Home Photographs Derek Seiling, Draw Ink Atlanta, Watercolor Illustrations of Homes Flowers, balloons and bottled water provided by Fourteen West Realtors LAURA JOINES Weekend parking provided by YWCA of Greater Atlanta Restaurants Enjoy the tastings you’ve sampled while on the Tour? Try these neighborhood eateries, gracious sponsors of the Virginia-Highland Tour of Homes.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlanta Beltline Redevelopment Plan
    Atlanta BeltLine Redevelopment Plan PREPARED FOR The Atlanta Development Authority NOVEMBER 2005 EDAW Urban Collage Grice & Associates Huntley Partners Troutman Sanders LLP Gravel, Inc. Watercolors: Rebekah Adkins, Savannah College of Art and Design Acknowledgements The Honorable Mayor City of Atlanta The BeltLine Partnership Shirley C. Franklin, City of Atlanta Fulton County The BeltLine Tax Allocation District Lisa Borders, President, Feasibility Study Steering Commi�ee Atlanta City Council Atlanta Public Schools The Trust for Public Land Atlanta City Council Members: Atlanta Planning Advisory Board (APAB) The PATH Foundation Carla Smith (District 1) Neighborhood Planning Units (NPU) Friends of the BeltLine Debi Starnes (District 2) MARTA Ivory Young Jr. (District 3) Atlanta Regional Commission Cleta Winslow (District 4) BeltLine Transit Panel Natalyn Archibong (District 5) Anne Fauver (District 6) Howard Shook (District 7) Clair Muller (District 8) Felicia Moore (District 9) C. T. Martin (District 10) Jim Maddox (District 11) Joyce Sheperd (District 12) Ceasar Mitchell (Post 1) Mary Norwood (Post 2) H. Lamar Willis (Post 3) Contents 1.0 Summary 1 7.0 Types of Costs Covered by TAD Funding 2.0 Introduction 5 and Estimated TAD Bond Issuances 77 2.1 The BeltLine Concept 5 7.0.1 Workforce Housing 78 2.2 Growth and Development Context 5 7.0.2 Land Acquisition–Right-of-Way, 2.3 Historic Development 7 Greenspace 78 2.4 Feasibility Study Findings 8 7.0.3 Greenway Design and Construction 78 2.5 Cooperating Partners 9 7.0.4 Park Design and Construction
    [Show full text]