Solid Earth, 11, 1053–1077, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/se-11-1053-2020 © Author(s) 2020. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. Mapping undercover: integrated geoscientific interpretation and 3D modelling of a Proterozoic basin Mark D. Lindsay1, Sandra Occhipinti1,2, Crystal Laflamme1,3, Alan Aitken1, and Lara Ramos1 1The Centre for Exploration Targeting, School of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia 2Mineral Resources, Commonwealth Science and Industry Research Organisation, Kensington, Western Australia, 6151, Australia 3Department of Geology and Geological Engineering, Laval University, Québec City, Québec G1V 0A6, Canada Correspondence: Mark D. Lindsay (
[email protected],
[email protected]) Received: 4 December 2019 – Discussion started: 17 January 2020 Revised: 29 April 2020 – Accepted: 15 May 2020 – Published: 24 June 2020 Abstract. Gravity and 3D modelling combined with geo- Bryah sub-basin and Padbury Basin. The conclusion is that chemical analysis examine the subsurface within and below the formation of the Yerrida Basin involves a geodynamic the poorly exposed Palaeoproterozoic Yerrida Basin in cen- history more complex than previously thought. This result tral Western Australia. Understanding the structure of a re- highlights the value in geophysics and geochemistry in re- gion is important as key features indicating past geodynamic vealing the complexity of the earlier geodynamic evolution processes and tectonic activity can be revealed. However, in of the basin that may be indiscernible from surface geology stable, post-depositional tectonic settings only the younger but may have high importance for the tectonic development sedimentary units tend to be widely exposed, rendering di- of the region and its mineral resources.