Read Ahead Is a JAPCC Product Realized in Collaboration with the Authors of the Essays Contained Herein

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Read Ahead Is a JAPCC Product Realized in Collaboration with the Authors of the Essays Contained Herein AHEA Joint Air & Space Power 20 READ Conference 21 21 20 JAPCC Conference JAPCC Delivering NATO Air & Space Power at the Speed of Relevance Joint Air Power Competence Centre 7–9 September 2021 von-Seydlitz-Kaserne | Römerstraße 140 | 47546 Kalkar (Germany) Visit us in the web: Joint Air Power www.japcc.org READAHEA Competence Centre Delivering NATO Air & Space Power at the Speed of Relevance Delivering NATO Air & Space Power at the Speed of Relevance Joint Air and Space Power Conference 2021 © This work is copyrighted. All inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected]. Acknowledgements This read ahead is a JAPCC product realized in collaboration with the authors of the essays contained herein. The JAPCC would like to thank the numerous authors who took the time to contribute to this product in an efort to advance this topic for discussion within NATO. Editorial Team Brig Gen Sgamba Col Brad Bredenkamp Col Matthew Willis Lt Col Henry Heren Maj Osman Aksu Maj Massimo Di Milia Maj Andreas Wurster Mr Simon J. Ingram Sgt1 Lilian Brandon Mr Sascha Kranefeld SSgt Marcel Jammoul Ms Britta Klein Disclaimer The views expressed in this work are those of the authors. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis and food for thought regarding possible ways ahead on this subject. Release This document is releasable to the public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von-Seydlitz-Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Denotes images digitally manipulated Moderator’s Foreword Esteemed Colleagues, I am extremely excited about the prospect of participating in the JAPCC’s Joint Air & Space Power Conference this year. Much can be achieved, as we have all learnt, through online ‘virtual’ meetings, but we have also experi- enced their limitations when compared to meeting ‘in real life’. I am cur- rently imagining being in a large room with actual people, listening, meet- ing and chatting together, face-to-face, and then over cofee during the breaks. I wonder if any of us will remember how this ‘normal’ human inter- action actually happens and how well we will adjust back to something we once took for granted? As I write this on a dull early March morning in England, there are still four more weeks until I can visit the hairdressers and (legally) get a proper hair- cut – so at least another four weeks of getting a shock every time I look in a mirror. On the more positive side, I have just had my frst vaccination shot and this seems to present the way out of this threat to all of us. But, whilst lockdown rules and regulations may have been diferent for all of us de- pending on our locations and personal circumstances, the challenges we face are more uniform – and they have continued to evolve. I do not just mean the challenges presented by the global pandemic, but also those presented by the changing world order. The security challenges to NATO did not just get put ‘on hold’ as our indi- vidual countries turned inward to battle the existential threat to survival at home. Indeed, the global pandemic also presented an opportunity to NATO’s near-peer adversaries to manoeuvre and attempt to gain an ad- vantage. How successful they may have been in doing this is, perhaps, yet to be determined, but we can be sure that any return to ‘business as usual’ V for global defence and security will forever retain a watermark of the COVID-19 crisis – and be indelibly marked and changed by it. The theme of the conference this year is ‘Delivering NATO Air and Space Power at the Speed of Relevance’, but what does this actually mean? In recent years, the term ‘speed of relevance’ appeared in several defence- related high-level papers. The 2018 US National Defense Strategy links the term to the need to reform processes in the US Department of Defense to facilitate quicker decision-making on the modernization of the armed forces. The term made its way subsequently in many NATO and NATO- related documents where it was used with respect to ensuring readiness, providing options to the Alliance as well as agile, fexible and efective Command and Control in support of NATO’s core tasks. From my preliminary reading (outlined above) about this term, it is clear that – unlike the speed of light – the speed of relevance is a dependent variable. But what does it depend on and what are the metrics that can be used to measure ‘relevance’? This is something that I hope the fve panels will explore in their discussions and I urge conference delegates to con- sider these points as well. The conference panels will explore how fve key areas relate to the conference theme: • Policy and Strategy • Dynamic C2 Synchronized Across Domains • Superiority in the Electromagnetic Spectrum • NATO Space The consultation process for the development of NATO’s Political Guid- ance 2023 which will provide decisive guidance for capability planning is supposed to start soon after our September conference. It is, therefore, extremely timely that the conference takes place when it does and that the JAPCC has managed to gather so many senior decision-makers and VI deep thinkers together in one place – from NATO and beyond. This con- ference represents a unique opportunity for us to spend a signifcant amount of time together, discussing and determining the challenges that we all face. In terms of conference outcomes, there is no reason why we should not aim high. However, we should also bear in mind that we will arrive in Essen in early September with a big bag of extremely com- plex questions. Even with all the frepower that the conference can mus- ter, we will not, realistically, come away with the same big bag flled with all the answers to those same complex questions. What we can expect, and what we can all work towards will be a better understanding and, perhaps, a reframing of how we might react and adjust our thinking and our ways of doing business. The JAPCC has worked tirelessly to get this conference back on track after the hiatus of the last year and a half. This year, once again, they have put together a carefully curated selection of articles which set the scene for each of the panels. If we are to take the most value from (and make the greatest contribution to) the panel discussions, we will need to read these articles in advance. In the days and weeks after the conference, I know that the JAPCC will continue to work tirelessly to construct a summary of what was discussed – and then use that summary to draw concrete conclusions to share with us all. I am delighted and proud to have been asked back this year to assist, in my own way, with these tasks. I look forward to meeting you all in September. Bruce Hargrave BSc MBA Independent Air and Space Power Advisor VII Table of Contents Moderator’s Foreword ............................................V Policy and Strategy – Panel Introduction .........17 I Maj Massimo Di Milia, IT Air Force Joint Air Power Competence Centre The Impact of Law on NATO’s Space Power II at the Speed of Relevance ...................................25 Mr Álvaro Martín Blanco, Col Dr Daniel Gallton, US Air Force, and Mr Dale Reding NATO Science and Technology Organization/NATO HQ Looking for a Few Good Operators ....................35 III Dr Kyleanne Hunter US Air Force Academy Avoiding Cyber Forever Wars ..............................43 IV Ms Gentry Lane ANOVA Intelligence VIII Outer Space, a Challenging Domain for V Ambitious Defence Strategy ...............................51 Dr Anne-Sophie Martin Sapienza University of Rome Increasing NATO’s Resilience ...............................61 VI Mr Omree Wechsler and Mr Doron Feldman Tel Aviv University Dynamic C2 Synchronized Across Domains – VII Panel Introduction ................................................71 Maj Osman Aksu, TU Air Force Joint Air Power Competence Centre Dynamic C2 Synchronized Across Domains .....81 VIII Lt Gen Fernando De la Cruz Caravaca, SP Air Force Commander, NATO Combined Air Operation Centre, Torrejón IX Table of Contents Is Human-On-the-Loop the Best Answer for IX Rapid Relevant Responses (R3)? ..........................91 Dr Michael Cowen, Capt (ret.) Rick Williams, US Navy, and Brig Gen (ret.) Doug Cherry, US Army Monterey Technologies, Incorporated Technology and Connectivity .......................... 101 X Maj Ferdinando Pagano, IT Air Force Italian Air Force Staf Multi-Domain Combat Cloud ........................... 111 XI Col (ret.) Hubert Saur, GE Air Force Airbus NATO Command and Control Resilience in XII Contested Environments .................................. 121 Mr Owen J. Daniels and Ms Clementine G. Starling Institute for Defense Analyses/Scowcroft Center for Strategy and Security, Atlantic Council X Human-On-the-Loop ......................................... 131 XIII Brig Gen (ret.) Jean Michel Verney, FR Air Force, Col (ret.) Thomas Vinçotte, FR Air Force, and Mr Laurent le Quement Airbus Defence and Space Superiority in the Electromagnetic XIV Spectrum – Panel Introduction ........................ 143 Maj Andreas Wurster, GE Army Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO Electronic Warfare and XV Cyberspace Resilience ....................................... 151 Air Chief Marshal Sir Stuart Peach GBE KCB ADC DL, UK Air Force Chairman, NATO Military Committee Speeding Up the OODA Loop with AI ............. 159 XVI Mr Owen J. Daniels Institute for Defense Analyses XI Table of Contents Cyberspace and XVII Joint Air and Space Power ................................ 169 XXI Lt Col Paul J. MacKenzie, CA Air Force Joint Air Power Competence Centre Electronic Protective Measures ....................... 179 XXII XVIII Mr Dirk A.
Recommended publications
  • ミルスペース 110709------[What’S New in Virtual Library?]
    - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -ミルスペース 110709- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - [What’s New in Virtual Library?] AW&ST ESA Bulletin 110627AWST_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg 1105ESA_Bull146_Contents.pdf, Cover.jpg [What’s New in Real Library?] [謝辞] ESA より ESA Bulletin No.146 May 2011 寄贈、 JAXA より ISAS News 11.06 寄贈、NICT より NICT News 11.05 号 寄贈、全て感謝。 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Futron 11.07- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2011 Orbital Launches by Launch Vehicle Family 2011 Orbital Commercial Launches Manufacturer Market Share of Satellites Launched Through June 30, 2011 1 Selected Satellites with Regulatory Activity During June 2011 Satellite Location Activity Intelsat 27 55.5WL Intelsat filed this request to launch and operate Intelsat 27, a replacement satellite for Intelsat 805 currently operating at 55.5 WL. Intelsat notes that Intelsat 27 will also carry a UHF payload that will operate in non-commercial frequencies. Intelsat states that Intelsat 27 is scheduled for launch in the fourth quarter of 2012 or first quarter of 2013. EchoStar 47 76.84WL EchoStar filed this request to de-orbit EchoStar 4 from its current location of 76.85 WL, where it is operating as a Mexican-licensed DBS, for a period of 30 days. EchoStar states that the satellite will be transferred to a disposal orbit at least 300 km above the geostationary arc. AMC-5 79.1WL SES Americomfiled this request to drift AMC-5 from 79.05 WL to 79.10 WL and to maintain the satellite at 79.10 WL with an expanded east-west station keeping tolerance of +/-0.1 degrees for a period of 30 days. SES Americomis seeking authority to conduct TT&C operations and does not intend to activate the communications payload during or after the drift.
    [Show full text]
  • TAPE SUBJECT LOG NAMELIST Chronological Review Boldface = Deceased Revised 8 December 2003
    NIXON PRESIDENTIAL MATERIALS STAFF TAPE SUBJECT LOG NAMELIST Chronological Review Boldface = deceased Revised 8 December 2003 A Prince [AAge] of Denmark: 806 Aaron, Henry L. (“Hank”): 55, 476, 488, 797 Aaronson, J. Hugo: 581 Abad, Francis L.: 602 Abate, Joseph: 453 Abbitt, Watkins M.: 15, 581 Abbott, Samuel A. (“Sammy”): 249 Abdulla, Abdul R.: 116 Abdnor, E. James: 744 Abel, I[lorwith] W[ilbur]: 15, 21, 63, 64, 72, 79, 81, 110, 111, 120, 128, 146, 269, 301, 336, 337, 479, 530, 531, 532, 534, 540, 541, 551, 553, 587, 591, 599, 610, 622, 623, 640, 679, 698, 706, 794 Abernathy, Ralph: 539 Abernethy, Robert G.: 27, 575, 754 Abernethy, Thomas G.: 6, 55, 134, 492, 581 Ablard, Charles D.: 102 Ablum, Floyd: 1 Abourezk, James: 486 Abplanalp, Robert H.: 11, 17, 24, 31, 42, 137, 140, 190, 220, 251, 274, 285, 311, 330, 339, 344, 347, 353, 450, 455, 462, 464, 466, 513, 518, 520, 571, 576, 584, 597, 599, 649, 653, 660, 662, 666, 695, 702, 705, 722, 724, 725, 734, 739, 745, 747, 759, 760, 798 Abrahams, Albert E.: 82, 96, 376, 571 Abrams, Gen. Creighton W., Jr.: 1, 4, 19, 20, 22, 23, 24, 31, 32, 50, 61, 62, 131, 133, 149, 151, 181, 189, 191, 246, 255, 298, 299, 317, 329, 330, 331, 332, 333, 334, 335, 336, 337, 338, 339, 354, 367, 368, 371, 374, 449, 451, 456, 457, 458, 459, 462, 464, 465, 467, 468, 470, 471, 472, 474, 476, 477, 478, 481, 482, 484, 498, 500, 504, 505, 507, 508, 511, 518, 520, 522, 529, 540, 543, 547, 548, 549, 558, 571, 574, 575, 635, 647, 648, 652, 655, 665, 673, 681, 685, 700, 701, 702, 703, 705, 706, 707, 708, 709, 710, 711, 713, 715,
    [Show full text]
  • JAPCC Annual Report 2019
    2019 annual REPORT Joint Air Power Competence Centre Joint Air Power www.japcc.org Competence Centre Cover picture: Satellite: © ESA /AOES Medialab; Earth: © 2012 EUMETSAT; Background: © StarLine /shutterstock © This work is copyrighted. All Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a product of the JAPCC. It does not represent the opinions or policies of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) and is designed to provide an independent overview, analysis, food for thought and recommendations regarding a possible way ahead on the subject. Release This document is releasable to the Public. Portions of the document may be quoted without permission, provided a standard source credit is included. Published and distributed by The Joint Air Power Competence Centre von­Seydlitz­Kaserne Römerstraße 140 47546 Kalkar Germany Telephone: +49 (0) 2824 90 2201 Facsimile: +49 (0) 2824 90 2208 E­Mail: [email protected] Website: www.japcc.org Denotes images digitally manipulated Follow us on Social Media JAPCC | annual REPORT 2019 1 foreword Today, NATO Air Forces stand on the verge of the at the peer­to­peer level. We must use the lessons most meaningful transformation of technology and learned from this and other exercises to evolve our capability in our history, a transformation which con­ Alliance into a connected, Joint All Domain fighting tinues to be enabled in part by the independent force that is agile and capable of acting at speed that thought and analysis from the recognized air and future conflicts will require. I have great confidence space power experts in the Joint Air Power Compe­ that our Nations and our people will work closely with tence Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit-Urgent Priorities
    NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED ING TH LOW E 20 OL 16 F W R A E R W S O A W P R I S U A M T M N I I T O J URGENT PRIORITIES PRIORITIES URGENT UR ES GENT PRIORITI JOINT AIR POWER FOLLOWING THE 2016 WARSAW SUMMIT URGENT PRIORITIES Joint Air Power Competence Centre JOINT AIR POWER NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit – Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED Joint Air Power Following the 2016 Warsaw Summit Urgent Priorities An Allied Command Transformation Headquarters Study Conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED NATO UNCLASSIFIED – PUBLICLY DISCLOSED © This work is copyrighted. No part may be reproduced by any process without prior written permission. Inquiries should be made to: The Editor, Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC), [email protected] Disclaimer This publication is a Supreme Allied Commander Transformation (SACT) HQ commis- sioned study conducted by the Joint Air Power Competence Centre (JAPCC). All copyright and intellectual property rights reside with HQ ACT, unless otherwise licensed. The views expressed in this work do not necessarily represent the position of the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), but are offered to foster dialogue and discussion re- garding urgent priorities in the field of air power capabilities and competencies. Though NATO classified documents may have informed the work of the authors, no clas- sified information has been directly quoted in this study, nor were any parts of classified information re-used in any form without prior sanitization.
    [Show full text]
  • Blue Light: America's First Counter-Terrorism Unit Jack Murphy
    Blue Light: America's First Counter-Terrorism Unit Jack Murphy On a dark night in 1977, a dozen Green Berets exited a C-130 aircraft, parachuting into a very different type of war. Aircraft hijackings had become almost commonplace to the point that Johnny Carson would tell jokes about the phenomena on television. But it was no laughing matter for the Department of Defense, who realized after the Israeli raid on Entebbe, that America was woefully unprepared to counter terrorist attacks. This mission would be different. The Special Forces soldiers guided their MC1-1B parachutes towards the ground but their element became separated in the air, some of the Green Berets landing in the trees. The others set down alongside an airfield, landing inside a thick cloud of fog. Their target lay somewhere through the haze, a military C-130 aircraft that had been captured by terrorists. Onboard there were no hostages, but a black box, a classified encryption device that could not be allowed to fall into enemy hands. Airfield seizures were really a Ranger mission, but someone had elected to parachute in an entire Special Forces battalion for the operation. The HALO team was an advanced element, inserted ahead of time to secure the aircraft prior to the main assault force arriving. Despite missing a number of team members at the rally point, the Green Berets knew they were quickly approaching their hit time. They had to take down the aircraft and soon. Armed with suppressed Sten guns, they quietly advanced through the fog. Using the bad weather to their advantage, they were able to slip right between the sentries posted to guard the aircraft.
    [Show full text]
  • Glossary of Terms
    GLOSSARY OF TERMS AC-130 SPECTRE: A ground support aircraft used by the U.S. military, based on the C-130 cargo plane. AC-130s are armed with a 105mm howitzer, 40mm cannons, and 7.62mm miniguns, and are considered the premier close air support weapon of the U.S. arsenal. Accuracy International: A British company producing high-quality preci- sion rifes, often used for military sniper applications. ACOG: Advanced Combat Optical Gunsight. A magnifed optical sight designed for use on rifes and carbines made by Trijicon. Te ACOG is popular among U.S. forces as it provides both magnifcation and an illuminated reticle that provides aiming points for various target ranges. AQ: Al-Qaeda. Meaning “the Base” in Arabic. A radical Islamic terrorist organization once led by Osama bin Laden. AQI: Al-Qaeda in Iraq. An Al-Qaeda-afliated Sunni insurgent group that was active against U.S. forces. Elements of AQI eventually evolved into ISIS. AT-4: Tube-launched 84mm anti-armor rocket produced in Sweden and used by U.S. forces since the 1980s. Te AT-4 is a throwaway weapon: after it is fred, the tube is discarded. ATF/BATFE: Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. A federal law enforcement agency, formally part of the Department of 393 1p_Carr_TerminalList_ds.indd 393 8/22/17 1:07 PM 394 GLOSSARY OF TERMS the Treasury, that doesn’t seem overly concerned with alcohol or to- bacco. ATPIAL: Advanced Target Pointer/Illuminator Aiming Laser. A weapon- mounted device that emits both visible and infrared target designa- tors for use with or without night observation devices.
    [Show full text]
  • Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017
    DoD2B 7000.14-R Financial Management Regulation Volume 11A, Chapter 9 * January 2017 VOLUME 11A, CHAPTER 9 “SUPPORT OF INTERNATIONAL MILITARY ACTIVITIES” SUMMARY OF MAJOR CHANGES All changes are denoted by blue font. Substantive revisions are denoted by a (*) preceding the section, paragraph, table, or figure that includes the revision. Unless otherwise noted, chapters referenced are contained in this volume. Hyperlinks are denoted by bold, italic, blue and underlined font. The previous version dated May 2015 is archived. PARAGRAPH EXPLANATION OF CHANGE/REVISION PURPOSE Added an overview section to comply with the Department of Defense (DoD) Financial Management Regulation (FMR) 090101 Addition Revision Standard Operating Procedures, dated June 15, 2015. 090201 Added definition for “DoD Component.” Addition 090202 Added definition for “Unified Combatant Command.” Addition Added a reference to the National Security Act of 1947 and 090204 Revision to the Joint Publication 1-02. 090206 Added definition for “Military Element.” Addition Added definition for a “Table of Organization and 090211 Addition Equipment.” Expanded the use of United States (U.S.) appropriated funds for U.S. military personnel who are members of an 090507.B.2. Addition international military headquarters that does not maintain a centralized international budget for such purposes. Added six North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Unit (NFIU) support elements at Tallinn, Table 9-1, Estonia; Riga, Latvia; Vilnius, Lithuania; Bydgoszcz, Addition paragraph A.4.f. Poland; Szekesfeharvar, Hungary; and Bratislava, Slovakia as approved by the NATO Defense Ministers on September 5, 2014. Moved from section A.2.g the Headquarters, Multinational Table 9-1, Division South-East at Bucharest, Romania and two NFIU Revision paragraph A.4.r.
    [Show full text]
  • Space Weapons Earth Wars
    CHILDREN AND FAMILIES The RAND Corporation is a nonprofit institution that EDUCATION AND THE ARTS helps improve policy and decisionmaking through ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENT research and analysis. HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE This electronic document was made available from INFRASTRUCTURE AND www.rand.org as a public service of the RAND TRANSPORTATION Corporation. INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS LAW AND BUSINESS NATIONAL SECURITY Skip all front matter: Jump to Page 16 POPULATION AND AGING PUBLIC SAFETY SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Support RAND Purchase this document TERRORISM AND HOMELAND SECURITY Browse Reports & Bookstore Make a charitable contribution For More Information Visit RAND at www.rand.org Explore RAND Project AIR FORCE View document details Limited Electronic Distribution Rights This document and trademark(s) contained herein are protected by law as indicated in a notice appearing later in this work. This electronic representation of RAND intellectual property is provided for non-commercial use only. Unauthorized posting of RAND electronic documents to a non-RAND website is prohibited. RAND electronic documents are protected under copyright law. Permission is required from RAND to reproduce, or reuse in another form, any of our research documents for commercial use. For information on reprint and linking permissions, please see RAND Permissions. The monograph/report was a product of the RAND Corporation from 1993 to 2003. RAND monograph/reports presented major research findings that addressed the challenges facing the public and private sectors. They included executive summaries, technical documentation, and synthesis pieces. SpaceSpace WeaponsWeapons EarthEarth WarsWars Bob Preston | Dana J. Johnson | Sean J.A. Edwards Michael Miller | Calvin Shipbaugh Project AIR FORCE R Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003.
    [Show full text]
  • Jan 4 2016 Comp Troller
    OFFICE OF THE UNDER SECRETARY OF DEFENSE 1100 DEFENSE PENTAGON WASHINGTON, DC 20301 -1100 JAN 4 2016 COMP TROLLER MEMORANDUM FOR ASSISTANT SECRETARIES OF THE MILITARY DEPARTMENTS (FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT AND COMPTROLLER) DIRECTORS OF THE DEFENSE AGENCIES DIRECTORS OF THE DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES DIRECTOR, JOINT STAFF COMPTROLLER, UNITED STATES EUROPEAN COMMAND SUBJECT: Updates to Department ofDefense Financial Management Regulation 7000.14-R, Volume 11A, Chapter 9, "Support oflnternational Military Activities" This memorandum updates the listing ofNorth Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Force Integration Units and Centers of Excellence, and their assigned administrative agent, as currently published in Table 9-1 ofVolume 11A, Chapter 9. These changes will be incorporated into the next chapter update planned for June 2016. Table 9-1, "International Military Headquarter and Related Agencies and Administrative Agents Responsible for Their Support and for Support to U.S. Elements" is revised to add as A.S.m the Center of Excellence- Energy Security (ESCOE) in Vilnius, Lithuania. This change was requested in Attachment 1. The Air Force will serve as the administrative agent. In addition, Table 9-1 is revised to add six new NATO Force Integration Units (NFIUs) with their associated administrative agents as follows: A.2.g.(1) NFIU Sofia, Bulgaria- Air Force; A.2.g.(2) NFIU Bucharest, Romania-Army; A.4.f.(1) NFIU Tallinn, Estonia-Navy; A.4.f.(2) NFIU Riga, Latvia- Navy; A.4.f.(3) NFIU Vilnius, Lithuania-Air Force; and A.4.f.(4) NFIU Bydgoszcz, Poland-Army. These changes were requested in Attachment 2. A draft update of Table 9-1 reflecting these changes is provided as Attachment 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Pope Dalton Fury
    SMALL WARS JOURNAL smallwarsjournal.com The Pope Dalton Fury Behind his back we referred to him simply as SAM or Stan the Man. Always with reverence and respect of course. Later on, about the time he started to wear shiny silver stars, we started to refer to him as The Pope. LTG Stanley McChrystal’s meteoric rise through the ranks is no surprise to anyone that has ever had the opportunity to work for or with him. I was fortunate, from a subordinate officer perspective, on numerous occasions. Few know the facts just yet as to why GEN McKeirnan was moved out of command in Afghanistan. Regardless of the reasons, and I’m certainly not read on to the scuttlebutt, I do know that America’s interests, America’s warriors, and America’s mission in Afghanistan couldn’t be in better hands under LTG McChrystal. My biggest concern is that I hope the senior officers in Afghanistan soon to be under LTG McChrystal’s command are well rested. I served as a staff officer under McChrystal in the late 90’s before leaving for 1st SFOD-D. My Ranger peers and I had a unique opportunity to see the good and the bad in the 1976 West Point graduate. I think if McChrystal were wounded on the battlefield, he would bleed red, black, and white – the official colors of the 75th Ranger Regiment. He is 110% US Army Ranger, rising to become the 10th Regimental Commander in the late 90’s, and still sports the physique to prove it. Even with a bum back and likely deteriorating knees after a career of road marching and jumping out of planes he doesn’t recognize the human pause button.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Reconnaissance Man Requirements
    Marine Reconnaissance Man Requirements Wayland is predispositional and localised difficultly while emollient Silvain mythicise and bulging. Admonished Giancarlo saps his nourishment solves executively. Lither Andres favor windingly. Jmir journals in florida has since changed it faces on that. And requirements of man is dispatched to their campaign. Like it encompasses theoretical, pervin la tua o de ti o de alguien con quien compartes tu red de ti o di una persona che condivide la. Army special forces or special. Orca design our reconnaissance marine jobs to discover the requirements. If it takes away the sere specialist skills on natural settings where different. Do marines or scout team coach stew smith and reconnaissance marine man, and our site nor france were better than to your admiralty law and said that us saying a general. Confined level reconnaissance man suits for. Which they return is a recruit is just might choose to religion leaves no way of elite us military force recon. As well as unmanned systems operating terminals worldwide career progression path typically through all the requirements for medical support. Fernsehprogramm in marine reconnaissance man is one effective applications in vietnam era stabo rig. Recon marine corps was used house decorative banner black. It helps service regiment construct validity and reconnaissance man suits for tactical role of man, i appreciate him. It encompasses theoretical, et al asad air service regiment, limiting activities of bales of survival, my class nguyen distinguished service. Trigger custom timing for ssafa for decades have extensive combat. We can add them no new guys, aviation support to.
    [Show full text]
  • Satcen Annual Report 2020
    ANNUAL REPORT 2020 TABLE OF CONTENTS SatCen SatCen European Union Satellite Centre Tel. +34 91 678 60 00 Fax: +34 91 678 60 06 e-mail: [email protected] Postal address: Apdo. de Correos 511, 28850 Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, Spain www.satcen.europa.eu Additional information on the European Union is available on the internet. It can be accessed through the Europa server (http://europa.eu). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2021. ISBN 978-92-95034-19-8 doi 10.2820/940883 © SatCen, 2021 Reproduction is authorised provided the source is acknowledged. Printed in Spain. Printed on white chlorine-free paper. This report is published in accordance with Article 7 of the COUNCIL DECISION 2014/401/CFSP of 26 June 2014. Excma. Sra. Doña Margarita Robles Fernández at SatCen, 05 November 2020 H.E. Ms Florenceat Parly,SatCen, French 24 September Minister of 2020 the Armed Forces Rear Admiral Fabio Agostini (Italian Navy), Commander of Operation EUNAVFOR MED IRINI at Satcen, 01 July 2020 Major General Michel Friedling, French Space Commander at SatCen, 17 September 2020 Visit of UME delegation to SatCen, 07 July 2020 Visit of HR/VP24 Josep February Borrell 2020 to the Centre on TABLE OF CONTENTS ANNUAL REPORT 2020 | SatCen 3 Foreword by the Director intelligence analysis. Highly skilled and multidisci- plinary teams analyse heterogeneous data at mul- tiple classification levels in a secure environment. The Centre’s fields of activity are broad and inclu- sive, covering all features, activities and phenom- ena related to security that can be analysed and monitored from space (security from space).
    [Show full text]