Alternative Fuel Transit Buses

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Alternative Fuel Transit Buses BUS STOP AlternativeAlternative NT O ME F E T N FuelFuel R E A R P G Transit Buses E Y D U A N C I I T R E D E M ST A AT ES OF Produced for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a U.S. DOE national laboratory Produced by the Center for Transportation Technologies and Systems at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), a U.S. Department of Energy national laboratory NREL 1617 Cole Blvd. Golden, CO 80401-3393 NREL/TP-425-20513 35th St. DE96013097 October 1996 Craig Ave. Colucci Pkwy. Printed with a renewable-source ink on paper containing at least 50% wastepaper, including 20% postconsumer waste FinalFinal ResultsResults fromfrom thethe NationalNational RenewableRenewable EnergyEnergy LaboratoryLaboratory VehicleVehicle EvaluationEvaluation ProgramProgram Alt Blvd. A lternative Fuel Transit Buses Final Results from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) Vehicle Evaluation Program by Robert Motta, Paul Norton, and Kenneth Kelly, NREL Kevin Chandler, Battelle Leon Schumacher, University of Missouri Nigel Clark,West Virginia University October 1996 The authors wish to thank all the transit agencies that participated in this program. World Wide Web: http://www.afdc.doe.gov Alternative Fuels Hotline: 1-800-423-1DOE Final Results Alternative Fuel Transit Buses Table of Contents Executive Summary . 1 Introduction . 3 Background . 3 Program Objective . 4 Program Design . 4 Data Collected . 6 Reliability. 8 Liquefied Natural Gas. 8 Compressed Natural Gas . 10 Alcohol . 10 Reliability Summary . 10 Fuel Economy . 11 Liquefied Natural Gas—Houston Dual-Fuel Buses . 11 Liquefied Natural Gas and Compressed Natural Gas— Dedicated Spark-Ignited Engines . 12 Alcohol . 12 Biodiesel . 13 Fuel Economy Summary. 13 Cost . 13 Operating Costs . 13 Capital Costs . 18 Emissions. 21 Compressed Natural Gas . 21 Alcohol . 22 Biodiesel . 26 Emissions Summary . 26 Other Considerations . 27 Lessons Learned . 28 Future Plans . 28 Summary and Conclusions . 29 Numbers, Numbers, Numbers . 30 iii Executive Summary Transit buses represent one of the best • Metro Dade, in Miami, Florida (five applications for alternative fuels, which methanol buses with Detroit Diesel have already made significant inroads into 6V92 engines and five CNG buses the transit bus market. As of January 1996, with Cummins L10 engines) approximately 4% of the more than 50,000 • Triboro in New York, New York (five transit buses in the United States surveyed methanol buses with Detroit Diesel by the American Public Transit Association 6V92 engines, and five CNG buses ran on an alternative fuel such as ethanol, with Cummins L10 engines) methanol, compressed natural gas (CNG), • Pierce Transit in Tacoma,Washington (10 or liquefied petroleum gas (LPG). Even CNG buses with Cummins L10 engines) more significant, 1 out of every 5 new • Metropolitan Transit Commission, buses on order is an alternative fuel bus. Minneapolis/St. Paul, Minnesota These numbers do not include electric (five ethanol buses with Detroit trolley buses. Diesel 6V92 engines) The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, • Greater Peoria Transit in Peoria, Illinois with funding from the U.S. Department of (five ethanol buses with Detroit Diesel Energy, initiated a program to study the per- 6V92 engines) formance, reliability, costs, and emissions • Bi-State in St. Louis, Missouri (five 20% of alternative fuel transit buses versus biodiesel blend buses with Detroit conventional diesel buses (controls). The Diesel 6V92 engines) program involved collecting detailed opera- The alternative fuel engines in this program tional and maintenance data from more have only a few years of product develop- than 100 buses at eight transit agencies ment, versus decades for the diesel engine; across the country. A program goal was to however, the results show they are compet- have 10 test buses of each alternative fuel ing very well with diesels in many areas: type, with 10 controls, split between two agencies, operating for 18 months.West Vehicle Reliability. Road calls experi- Virginia University used its transportable enced per 1,000 miles of operation con- chassis dynamometer to measure the emis- stitute one measure of a bus’s reliability. sions from the buses using a Central A road call is defined as any event that Business District (CBD) driving cycle. prevents a driver from completing his or her route and results in a call for a Transit properties involved in the program, backup bus. The program studied total and their alternative fuel buses, were: road calls and those attributable to • Houston Metro, in Houston,Texas engine/fuel system-related components (10 liquefied natural gas [LNG] buses only—the areas most likely to be affected with Detroit Diesel 6V92 pilot ignition by alternative fuel use. The number of natural gas engines) engine/fuel system-related road calls for • Tri-Met, in Portland, Oregon (eight LNG the Tacoma CNG buses is the same as for buses with Cummins L10 dedicated the diesel buses. Most other sites show spark-ignited engines) some reliability penalty, but in many 1 Alternative Fuel Final Results Transit Buses cases the causes are either rela- Vehicle Emissions. Emissions tively minor (the buses running were measured on a transportable out of fuel because the driver is chassis dynamometer using the unfamiliar with the vehicle), or CBD driving cycle. appear solvable (fuel filter plug- Natural gas and alcohol buses ging because of fuel quality prob- were shown to have the potential lems at the alcohol sites). to significantly lower particulate Operating Costs. Operating costs matter (PM) and oxides of nitro- of the buses are largely driven by gen (NOx) emissions. With the fuel cost. Fuel cost differ- natural gas, PM emissions were ences versus diesel far outweigh virtually eliminated. any differences in maintenance Test results also showed high costs between the alternative fuel variability in the emissions results and diesel buses. Operating costs from the alternative fuel vehicles. are lowest for the CNG buses, This probably results from the which are approximately equal relative immaturity of the tech- to diesel bus operating costs. nology and from the different Operating costs are the highest maintenance requirements of for the alcohol and biodiesel the alternative fuel engines. buses because of high fuel prices. Investigative emissions testing Capital Costs. Capital costs con- showed substantial reductions sist of the extra cost to purchase in high-emitting vehicles after an alternative fuel bus, and the tune-ups and parts replacements. extra cost (if any) to modify the Both diesel and alternative facilities to fuel, service, and main- fuel technologies have changed tain them. Capital costs are the substantially since we ran our highest for CNG and LNG buses, emission tests. Newer generation and lowest for the alcohol and CNG engines often feature closed- biodiesel buses—inverse to the loop feedback control of air:fuel operating costs. In the future, ratio, which should significantly alternative fuel engine prices are reduce emissions variability expected to decrease as volumes between engines. Newer diesel increase, although whether they engines are electronically man- will be equal to or lower than aged and have lower PM emis- diesel is unclear. sions to meet the latest At the present time, no alterna- Environmental Protection Agency tive fuel combines a low operat- standards. We plan to test both ing cost with a low up-front types of engines in the future. capital cost. Looking to the future, newer, signifi- cantly more advanced alternative fuel engines than those in this pro- gram continue to be introduced, and they promise even better performance. 2 Final Results Alternative Fuel Transit Buses Introduction Background Nevertheless, this information is far superior to none, and often reveals The National Renewable Energy trends that continue to be true Laboratory (NREL) is a U.S. even with newer technology. Department of Energy (DOE) Some people may wonder why we national laboratory; this project was included data on alcohol engines in funded by DOE. this report, as the ethanol and One of NREL’s missions is to objec- methanol engines had been discon- tively evaluate the performance, tinued from production at the time emissions, and operating costs of of this writing. Because this is the alternative fuel vehicles so fleet only study of its kind, we decided to managers can make informed deci- include the information to present sions when purchasing them. an across-the-board comparison of Alternative fuels have made greater alternative fuels. We believed that inroads into the transit bus market documenting the experience with than into any other. Each year, the all the fuels in one report was American Public Transit Association important. We also recently learned (APTA) surveys its members on that one transit authority placed an their inventory and buying plans. order for the ethanol 6V92 engine, The latest APTA data show that so this engine may again become about 4% of the 50,000 transit available. The ethanol information buses in its survey run on an alter- may therefore be more relevant native fuel. Furthermore, 1 in 5 of than we anticipated. the new transit buses that members This report has data and results that have on order are alternative fuel are significantly updated from our buses. This program was designed previous reports, in which we stat- to comprehensively and objectively ed that in some cases (such as with evaluate the alternative fuels in use Miami) the diesel buses started the in the industry. program at a higher mileage In designing a program of this type, (odometer) reading than the alter- our most challenging problem was native fuel buses. The data available providing information on the latest to us were therefore not for compa- products in a short period of time. rable periods in the buses’ life. We Once a new product is introduced, have since received back data on all we must find a suitable fleet that the sites, so comparisons at each has ordered the vehicles, along with site are now made between buses similar diesel controls.
Recommended publications
  • Mike Quill Villa Roma
    Seni r BuzzSUMMER 2019 The Official Publication of the TWU Local 100 Retirees Association • 195 Montague 3rd Floor • Brooklyn NY 11201 NOSTALGIC PHOTOS from back in the day Page 3 Retirees Remember September Outing to the Great VILLA MIKE ROMA QUILL Planned- Page 18 Fondly Pages 4-5 www.twulocal100.org/retirees-association Director’s Letter by Mike Tutrone, Director, TWU Local 100 Retirees Association I am happy to announce that at our last executive board meeting a couple of changes were introduced and passed in our quest to improve the lot of TWU Retiree Association members. Change number one was that Effective June 1, 2019, all the benefits in our Hospital Stay Program will be doubled, the weekly hospital income will rise from $150.00 to $300.00 per week, and all other benefits will rise accordingly. Change number two is that the Retiree Association will now cover the cost of your Defensive Driving course, see the listing of classes here at the Union Hall. For those of you who are unable to take advantage of the classes at the union hall, merely send us a copy of the course completion certificate and a copy of your payment receipt and we will reimburse you. This benefit is capped at $25.00 per member, spouse is included if you have a family membership. Mike Quill Film Prescriptions Thanks to all, who have contributed to the By now everyone should have received their new MIKE QUILL documentary film that Is prescription cards from CVS Caremark, if you have being produced and directed by not received them call the MTA BSC at 646-376-0123 Macdara Vallely (See the page and request a new card.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Bio- Ethanol and Biogas Initiatives for Transport in Sweden
    Assessment of bio- ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden Background information for the EU-project PREMIA EU Contract N° TREN/04/FP6EN/S07.31083/503081 May 2005 2 Abstract This report is the result of an assignment on assessment of bio-ethanol and biogas initiatives for transport in Sweden, granted by VTT Processes, Energy and Environment, Engines and Vehicles, Finland to Atrax Energi AB, Sweden. The report of the assignment is intended to append the literature and other information used in the “PREMIA” project The work has been carried out by Björn Rehnlund, Atrax Energi AB, Sweden, with support from Martijn van Walwijk, France. The report describes the development of the production and use of biobio-ethanol and biogas (biomass based methane) as vehicle fuels in Sweden and gives an overview of today’s situation. Besides data and information about numbers of vehicles and filling stations, the report also gives an overview of: • Stakeholders • The legal framework, including standards, specifications, type approval, taxation etc. • Financial support programs. Public acceptance, side effects and the effect off the introduction of bio-ethanol and biogas as vehicle fuels on climate gases are to some extent also discussed in this report. It can be concluded that since the early 1990’s Sweden has had a perhaps slow but steadily increasing use of bio-ethanol and biogas. Today having the EC directive on promotion of bio bio-fuels and other renewable fuels in place the development and introduction of filling stations and vehicles has started to increase rapidly. From 1994 to 2004 the number of filling stations for bio-ethanol grew from 1 to 100 and during the year 2004 until today to 160 stations.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study on the Emissions of Butanol Using a Spark Ignition Engine and Their Reduction Using Electrostatically Assisted Injection
    A STUDY ON THE EMISSIONS OF BUTANOL USING A SPARK IGNITION ENGINE AND THEIR REDUCTION USING ELECTROSTATICALLY ASSISTED INJECTION BY BENJAMIN R. WIGG THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2011 Urbana, Illinois Adviser: Professor Dimitrios C. Kyritsis Abstract Butanol is a potential alternative to ethanol and offers many benefits including a much higher heating value and lower latent heat of vaporization. It also has a higher cetane number than ethanol and improved miscibility in diesel fuel. Additionally, butanol is less corrosive and less prone to water absorption than ethanol, which allows it to be transported using the existing fuel supply pipelines. However, while some previous research on the emissions of butanol-gasoline blends is available, little research exists on the emissions of neat butanol. This thesis focuses on two areas of study. The first area relates to on the comparison of UHC, NOx, and CO emissions of several butanol-gasoline and ethanol-gasoline blended fuels during combustion in an SI engine. The objective was to compare the emissions of butanol combustion to the ones of ethanol and gasoline. The second part of the study relates to the use of electrostatically assisted injection as a means of reducing the UHC emissions of butanol by decreasing the fuel droplet size using a charge electrode and extraction ring designed for a port fuel injector. Emissions measurements taken with and without a charge applied to the injector were used to determine the effect of applying a voltage to the fuel spray on engine emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis
    Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis Caley Johnson, Anelia Milbrandt, Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe National Renewable Energy Laboratory Suggested Citation Johnson, Caley, Anelia Milbrandt, and Yimin Zhang, Rob Hardison, and Austen Sharpe. 2020. Jamaican Domestic Ethanol Fuel Feasibility and Benefits Analysis. Golden, CO: National Renewable Energy Laboratory. NREL/TP-5400-76011. https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/76011.pdf NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy Technical Report Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy NREL/TP-5400-76011 Operated by the Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC May 2020 This report is available at no cost from the National Renewable Energy National Renewable Energy Laboratory Laboratory (NREL) at www.nrel.gov/publications. 15013 Denver West Parkway Contract No. DE-AC36-08GO28308 Golden, CO 80401 303-275-3000 • www.nrel.gov NOTICE This work was authored by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory, operated by Alliance for Sustainable Energy, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) under Contract No. DE-AC36- 08GO28308. Funding provided by the U.S. Department of State.
    [Show full text]
  • Interim President's Report BOT Meeting
    Interim President’s Report BOT Meeting – January 28, 2021 Standing Items • Enrollment Report • COVID-19 Update 1. The County, although the supply was limited, continues to utilize North and South campuses as a point of dispensing 6,216 vaccines; 2nd most of all the community colleges in the state. 2. Pooled Test site closed as South Campus this week; consolidating. 3. Drive-through testing site has closed. 4. Classes started 1/19/21 • Open Forum 1/21/21 – Interim President Reuter started off followed by Mark Pacholec and Amy Yoder. • Pooled Testing – SUNY will be monitoring 100% testing. • Spring Re-opening Plans – approved. • 5,182 Campus Clear Users. • 1,102 tested since 1/13 – 0.27% positivity rate. • Check points at all campuses. • Pooled testing at all 3 campuses. College Updates • January 13, 2021 - Opening Day – Successful event, Thank you to Chairwoman Wilson for her participation. The event was viewed by 517 staff; 583 for Fall semester. After some introductory remarks, there were 12 breakout sessions and the largest attended was “Promoting Equal Access and Effective Interaction in the Remote Classroom”. • January 13, 2021 - D’Youville Testimony, started off with D’Youville President, then Interim President Reuter and Presidents Deeb and Murabito, followed by six speakers, all with affiliation to D’Youville, some of which not disclosed, false statements, non-credit and remedial illegal in the state of Tennessee as well as the hours spent to take public transportation to NCCC while ignoring ECC’s City Campus. A response was drafted to the Vice Chancellor, State Ed who conducted the public hearing and copied Regent Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results
    September 1999 • NREL/TP-540-25818 Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results K. Kelly, L. Eudy, and T. Coburn National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-98-GO10337 September 1999 • NREL/TP-540-25818 Light-Duty Alternative Fuel Vehicles: Federal Test Procedure Emissions Results K. Kelly, L. Eudy, and T. Coburn Prepared under Task No. FU905010 National Renewable Energy Laboratory 1617 Cole Boulevard Golden, Colorado 80401-3393 NREL is a U.S. Department of Energy Laboratory Operated by Midwest Research Institute ••• Battelle ••• Bechtel Contract No. DE-AC36-98-GO10337 TP-25818 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This work was sponsored by the Office of Technology Utilization, which is part of the U.S. Department of Energy’s (DOE) Office of Transportation Technologies in Washington, D.C. Mr. Dana O’Hara is DOE’s program manager for the light-duty vehicle evaluation projects at the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Appreciation is expressed to the three emissions laboratories that performed the testing: Environmental Research and Development, in Gaithersburg, Maryland; Automotive Testing Laboratory, in East Liberty, Ohio; and ManTech Environmental, in Denver, Colorado. We also thank Phillips Chemical Company and Compressed Gas Technologies for supplying the test fuels for this project. NOTICE This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States government. Neither the United States government nor any agency thereof, nor any of their employees, makes any warranty, express or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, appara- tus, product, or process disclosed, or represents that its use would not infringe privately owned rights.
    [Show full text]
  • Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual (Part B)
    7UDQVLW&DSDFLW\DQG4XDOLW\RI6HUYLFH0DQXDO PART 2 BUS TRANSIT CAPACITY CONTENTS 1. BUS CAPACITY BASICS ....................................................................................... 2-1 Overview..................................................................................................................... 2-1 Definitions............................................................................................................... 2-1 Types of Bus Facilities and Service ............................................................................ 2-3 Factors Influencing Bus Capacity ............................................................................... 2-5 Vehicle Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-5 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-13 Fundamental Capacity Calculations .......................................................................... 2-15 Vehicle Capacity................................................................................................... 2-15 Person Capacity..................................................................................................... 2-22 Planning Applications ............................................................................................... 2-23 2. OPERATING ISSUES............................................................................................ 2-25 Introduction..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol and Cellulosic Biofuel Fuels Credit General Instructions
    Alcohol and Cellulosic Biofuel Fuels Credit OMB No. 1545-0231 Form 6478 2011 Department of the Treasury Attachment Internal Revenue Service ▶ Attach to your tax return. Sequence No. 83 Name(s) shown on return Identifying number Caution. You cannot claim any amounts on Form 6478 that you claimed (or will claim) on Form 720 (Schedule C), Form 8849, or Form 4136. (a) (b) (c) Type of Fuel Number of Gallons Rate Column (a) x Column (b) Sold or Used 1 Qualified ethanol fuel production for fuel sold or used before 2012 (see instructions for election) . 1 2 Alcohol 190 proof or greater and alcohol 190 proof or greater in fuel mixtures sold or used before 2012 . 2 3 Alcohol less than 190 proof but at least 150 proof and alcohol less than 190 proof but at least 150 proof in fuel mixtures sold or used before 2012 . 3 4 Qualified cellulosic biofuel production for fuel sold or used before 2012 that is alcohol (see instructions for election) . 4 5 Qualified cellulosic biofuel production for fuel sold or used before 2012 that is not alcohol (see instructions for election) . 5 6 Qualified cellulosic biofuel production for fuel sold or used after 2011 (see instructions for election) . 6 7 Add the amounts in column (c) on lines 1 through 6. Include this amount in your income for 2011 and, if you reported an amount on lines 4, 5, or 6 above, enter your IRS registration number (see instructions) . 7 8 Alcohol and cellulosic biofuel fuels credit from partnerships, S corporations, cooperatives, estates, and trusts (see instructions) .
    [Show full text]
  • Bringing Biofuels on the Market
    Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Report Delft, July 2013 Author(s): Bettina Kampman (CE Delft) Ruud Verbeek (TNO) Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft) Pim van Mensch (TNO) Harry Croezen (CE Delft) Artur Patuleia (TNO) Publication Data Bibliographical data: Bettina Kampman (CE Delft), Ruud Verbeek (TNO), Anouk van Grinsven (CE Delft), Pim van Mensch (TNO), Harry Croezen (CE Delft), Artur Patuleia (TNO) Bringing biofuels on the market Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits Delft, CE Delft, July 2013 Fuels / Renewable / Blends / Increase / Market / Scenarios / Policy / Technical / Measures / Standards FT: Biofuels Publication code: 13.4567.46 CE Delft publications are available from www.cedelft.eu Commissioned by: The European Commission, DG Energy. Further information on this study can be obtained from the contact person, Bettina Kampman. Disclaimer: This study Bringing biofuels on the market. Options to increase EU biofuels volumes beyond the current blending limits was produced for the European Commission by the consortium of CE Delft and TNO. The views represented in the report are those of its authors and do not represent the views or official position of the European Commission. The European Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this report, nor does it accept responsibility for any use made thereof. © copyright, CE Delft, Delft CE Delft Committed to the Environment CE Delft is an independent research and consultancy organisation specialised in developing structural and innovative solutions to environmental problems. CE Delft’s solutions are characterised in being politically feasible, technologically sound, economically prudent and socially equitable.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhythms of Relation: Black Popular Music and Mobile Technologies
    Rhythms of Relation: Black Popular Music and Mobile Technologies Alexander G. Weheliye In this essay I focus on the singular performances of the interface between (black) subjectivity and informational technologies in popular music, ask- ing how these performances impact current definitions of the technologi- cal. After a brief examination of those aspects of mobile technologies that gesture beyond disembodied communication, I turn to the multifarious manifestations of techno-informational gadgets (especially cellular/mobile telephones) in contemporary R&B, a genre that is acutely concerned, both in content and form, with the conjuring of interiority, emotion, and affect. The genre’s emphasis on these aspects provides an occasion to analyze how technology thoroughly permeates spheres that are thought to represent the hallmarks of humanist hallucinations of humanity. I outline the extensive and intensive interdependence of contemporary (black) popular music and mobile technologies in order to ascertain how these sonic formations refract communication and embodiment and ask how this impacts rul- ing definitions of the technological. The first group of musical examples surveyed consists of recordings released between 1999 and 2001; the sec- ond set are recordings from years 2009–2010. Since ten years is almost an eternity in the constantly changing universes of popular music and mobile technologies, analyzing the sonic archives from two different historical moments allows me to stress the general co-dependence of mobiles and music without silencing the breaks that separate these “epochs.” Finally, I gloss a visual example that stages overlooked dimensions of mobile tech- nologies so as to amplify the rhythmic flow between the scopic and the sonic.
    [Show full text]
  • Alcohol Fuel Manual
    The Manual for the Home and Farm Production of Alcohol Fuel by S.W. Mathewson Ten Speed Press J.A. Diaz Publications 1980 Table of Contents Chapter 1 AN OVERVIEW Alcohol Fuel Uses of Alcohol Fuel Other Alternative Fuels Chapter 2 BASIC FUEL THEORY Chemical Composition Combustion Properties Volatility Octane Ratings Water Injection Exhaust Composition Engine Performance – Straight Alcohol Engine Performance – Alcohol Blends Chapter 3 UTILIZATION OF ALCOHOL FUELS Methods of Utilization Alcohol Blends Pure Alcohol Diesel Engines Engine Modification Alcohol Injection Chapter 4 ETHANOL PRODUCTION – GENERAL DISCUSSION Raw Materials Manufacturing Steps Process Design Chapter 5 PROCESSING STEPS COMMON TO ALL MATERIALS Dilution Ph Control Backslopping Cleanliness Hydrometers 1 Chapter 6 PROCESSING STEPS SPECIFIC TO SACCHARINE MATERIALS General Description Extraction Chapter 7 PROCESSING STEPS SPECIFIC TO STARCHY MATERIALS Preparation of Starchy Materials Milling Cooking Conversion Malting Premalting Preparation of Malt Enzyme Conversion Acid Hydrolosis Mash Cooling Chapter 8 PROCESSING STEPS SPECIFIC TO CELLULOSE MATERIALS Cellulose Conversion Chapter 9 YEAST AND FERMENTATION Yeast Yeast Preparation Fermentation Fermentation By-products Note of Caution Chapter 10 INDIVIDUAL RAW MATERIALS Sugar/Starch Content vs Alcohol Saccharine Materials Fruits Molasses Cane Sorghum Sugar Beets Sugar Corn Wastes Starchy Materials Grains Jerusalem Artichokes Potatoes Sweet Potatoes Cellolose Materials Multiple Enzyme Treatment Chapter 11 DISTILLATION Distillation
    [Show full text]
  • ARC Booklet 2019 – Final
    A series of events and exhibitions in and around Highams Park HIGHAMS PARK ART TRAIL 10th —19th May 1 THE FRIENDS OF THE HIGHAMS PARK SPRING FESTIVAL 2019 At The Highams Park Sunday • 19th May • 11AM-4PM join us! for an afternoon of music (including A brass band), entertainment, food & craft stalls. FEATURING The Essex Dog Display Team, Highams park’s very own Maypole AND The Highams Park Great BRITISH Bake off (organised by Act 2). The Highams Park IG8 9RB – Access From Henry’s Avenue Tamworth Avenue & Keynsham Avenue https://tinyurl.com/HP-SpringFest2019 Sponsored by 2 Hello and welcome to the 2019 Highams Park Art)Trail! In a year when Waltham Forest is hosting the first London Borough of Culture, the ARC team are excited to be bringing you this year's Highams Park Art Trail. Packed with lots of great work by local artists and the Wild About Highams Park animal sculpture trail this year we are looking at nature and celebrating how lucky we are to be so close to the forest. There are also lots of great events lined up for you to enjoy, the week kicks off with the Vintage Market at Hale End Library, with vintage stalls and book signings, kids activities and music from Harmony E4 Choir. During the week of the Art Trail you will be able to visit artists studios, listen to live bands at Highams Park Live, hear poetry being read whilst sipping wine, make a clay pot, dance to ABBA and see the Regal lit up with neon signs.
    [Show full text]