Fife and Drum Mar 2008
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The Newsletter of the Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common v. 12 No. 1 March 2008 1 Thomas Williamson’s View of Fort York 4 Beyond the Fringes 2 The Artillery at the Capture of York 5 The Library of Major General Sir Isaac Brock 3 Province Proceeds on First Parliament Site 7 Administator’s Report 4 1812: War with America 7 Mackeroons Jon Latimer’s Book Reviewed 8 Upcoming Events Thomas Williamson’s Wonderful View of Fort York by Stephen Otto A wonderful new view of Fort York in the 1840s has been discovered by chance in a school boy’s sketchbook. In an article entitled “Art Education in a Manly Environment: Educating the Sons of the Establishment in a 19th Century Boys’ School,” (Studies in Art Education, vol. 42, no. 2, Winter 2001), Prof. F. Graeme Chalmers tells how pupils at Toronto’s elite Upper Canada College (UCC) learned to draw as part of their gentlemanly education. Listed as an example are the contents of a sketchbook produced by third- Fort York from the east, 1840, by Thomas Williamson (Courtesy of Upper Canada College Archives, Toronto) form pupil, Thomas Williamson, aged 17, which is now found in the UCC Archives. On page 24 are drawings in pen and wash of a child, houses in a landscape, and the Toronto Garrison from the east. Williamson’s sketch adds much to what is known of how the fort looked after it had been strengthened following the 1838 rebellion, says Dr. Carl Benn, chief curator for City of Toronto museums and an authority on the fort’s history. In the sketch the fort appears as a low-lying group of buildings surrounded by ramparts and log palisades. Outside its walls in the Garrison Creek ravine (right foreground) is seen the so-called artillery square composed of horse stables, straw stores and a gun shed. Inside the garrison’s gates most buildings in the view are still easily identified even though only their roofs are visible. The guardhouse, commandant’s house and new ‘D’ barracks are all there. However, one flat-roofed structure near the east blockhouse (extreme left) is still a mystery. Williamson’s work brings new life to what had previously just been outlines on a map and provides a better understanding of what the east side of the fort looked like. For example, the palisading and stockading are more extensive and impressive than previously thought. Thomas Williamson, the son of a prominent Stoney Creek merchant and farmer, entered UCC as a boarder in September 1839. He signed and dated the sketchbook’s title page Dec. 10, 1840. In schoolboy fashion he described his hometown there as “the Capital of Canada,” likely a sly poke at a matter then under discussion: where the seat of government would be following the Act of Union that joined Upper and Lower Canada. Shortly the honour would come to rest on Kingston. The title page also includes a specimen of his handwriting: “Let us not expect too much pleasure in this life: no situation is exempt from trouble. The best persons are no doubt the happiest but they have their trials and afflictions.” In some ways Williamson was one of the latter people. Recognized at the end of the Fall term, 1840, for both his good conduct and proficiency, he secured firsts in Greek, Latin, arithmetic, writing and geometrical drawing in perspective, The same sort of “revision” in the telling of the battle of York all the while grieving the death of a younger brother who had is wanted in relation to the popular idea that the British lost passed away only a month before. the Battle of Lake Erie in September 1813, in part, because guns intended for their squadron were captured at York. This At UCC geometrical and ornamental drawing were taught is simply untrue. as separate subjects; the sketchbook holds examples of the latter. Williamson’s ornamental drawing teacher was James It is understandable, however, that such an idea is still being Hamilton (1810-1896) who emigrated from England about repeated. William James, the British lawyer-turned-historian 1830 to join his parents who had settled in Upper Canada described the battle in 1818, writing about how the guns a short time before. Initially, Hamilton made his living by intended for the frigate Sir Isaac Brock “lay on the ground teaching school, though not at UCC. By 1834, however, he partly covered with snow and frozen mud.” James had never had gravitated to a more secure position as a bank clerk. Art been to York, especially not at the end of a balmy April, but was a hobby that prompted him to do occasional sketches his prose appealed to others, including Theodore Roosevelt around town. It also brought him into contact with the who repeated the loss of the guns in his naval history in 1882. architect John G. Howard and others who, inspired by The tale has been retold again and again and even Canada’s Toronto’s incorporation as a city in March 1834, organized renowned historian C. P. Stacey wrote, “The armament and its first exhibition of art. Afterwards Howard and Hamilton equipment for the British squadron on Lake Erie was at York remained close. Probably it was through Howard who taught in April 1813, waiting to be sent to the base at Amherstburg.” geometrical drawing at UCC that Hamilton came there in Where did they get such a notion? Blame Sir George Prevost, mid-1839 to teach ornamental drawing. Hamilton remained the governor-in-chief of British North America who, covering at UCC only two years before resigning in 1841, possibly his own culpability for the defeat at York, lied to his superiors because his young family demanded more of his time or his in England in July 1813 when he alleged, “The ordnance, workload at the bank became heavier. ammunition and other stores for the service on Lake Erie... Williamson left UCC later that same year, perhaps to work were either destroyed or fell into the enemy’s hands when for his father. Little more is known about him, He died at York was taken.” No one, it seems, ever pointed out to Prevost age 27 in Stoney Creek from an inflammation of the lungs that, during the previous January, his military secretary had on Sept. 9, 1851, and was buried in a family plot in the informed officers in Upper Canada that guns intended for Methodist, now municipal, cemetery. the new ships on Lakes Ontario and Erie would not reach Quebec until May, at the earliest, prompting those officers to patch together temporary, and awkward, batteries for the vessels. William James and other historians missed this latter “Covered with snow and frozen mud.” document and related letters completely in their research. So, what sort of artillery was at York? Do not rely on Roger The Artillery Sheaffe’s rendition to ferret out the truth. In the two versions of his official report he referred to “two twelve-pounders and at The Capture of York two old condemned eighteen-pounders without trunnions and... a twelve-pounder of the same description.”To his close by Robert Malcomson correspondent Bishop Jacob Mountain he wrote, “Two twelve pounders and two field sixes were furnished for the defence Writing military history would be so much easier if of an open untenable town.”Three weeks before the battle, the people involved in long-ago events had been more however, Sheaffe mentioned, “2 12-prs mounted, 6 18-prs and conscientious about making accurate lists of their men and hope to have more ready in a few days.” arms on the eve of battle. Instead, we are left with official reports that exaggerate success and underplay disaster and a scattering of other archival documents. The previous article in this series showed the inaccuracies in the data that Major General Sir Roger Sheaffe reported after the Americans captured Little York on 27 April 1813. Generally, historians have repeated Sheaffe’s numbers, backing them up with anecdotal information from other participants in the action. A more realistic picture has emerged, however, based on the evidence of regimental records and other military documents held in Canadian, British and American archives, revealing that Sheaffe had nearly twice the number of men in arms than he reported. The Battery, Fort York, by W. J. Thomson (The Globe, 8 Feb. 1890) 2 The Fife and Drum Sheaffe’s remembrance is undone quickly, however, by two or destroyed during the American occupation. But did the fall “returns” (status reports found in Record Group 8 at Library of York doom the British to defeat on Lake Erie? No, that and Archives Canada) of artillery mounted, or in the field, at battle saw too few skilled seamen sail poorly armed vessels York, dated 31 March 1813, that show 20 guns: into action where they suffered from balky winds and plain, 2 6-pdr. brass field guns (long stationed at York) old rotten luck. 2 18-pdr. long guns (brought by Simcoe) Robert Malcomson’s latest 2 12-pdr. long guns (sent from Lower Canada) book, Capital in Flames: The American Attack 6 6-pdr. long guns on York, 1813, will be (off the schooner Duke of Gloucester under repair) published by Robin Brass 8 18-pdr. carronades (sent from Fort George) Studio in April and launched After the battle, however, Commodore Isaac Chauncey wrote at Fort York on Sunday the that he had “found at this place 28 Cannon of different 27th of April at 2:30pm. calibre, from 32 to 6 pounders,” a figure also noted in a letter Free Admission to Fort York sent by a surgeon in the squadron.