Medical Care of American Pows During the War of 1812

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Medical Care of American Pows During the War of 1812 Canadian Military History Volume 17 Issue 1 Article 5 2008 Medical Care of American POWs during the War of 1812 Gareth A. Newfield Canadian War Museum, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh Part of the Military History Commons Recommended Citation Newfield, Gareth A. "Medical Care of American POWs during the War of 1812." Canadian Military History 17, 1 (2008) This Canadian War Museum is brought to you for free and open access by Scholars Commons @ Laurier. It has been accepted for inclusion in Canadian Military History by an authorized editor of Scholars Commons @ Laurier. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Newfield: Medical Care of POWs Medical Care of American POWs during the War of 1812 Gareth A. Newfield n 2005, a service in Halifax upkeep was difficult, rendering medical Icommemorated US soldiers and care often chaotic. British medical sailors who perished in Britain’s Melville officers none the less cared for captives Island prisoner-of-war camp during adequately and comparably to the way the War of 1812 and whose remains they assisted their own forces. now lie on Deadman’s Island, a nearby peninsula. The service culminated Organization nearly a decade of debate, in which local Processing the Sick and history enthusiasts, the Canadian and Wounded American media, and Canadian and US politicians rescued the property ew formal conventions dealt with the from developers. The media in particular had Ftreatment of prisoners of war during highlighted the prisoners’ struggles with disease the period. While it was common for combatant and death, often citing the sombre memoirs of nations to agree upon temporary conventions survivors.1 Curiously, Canadian investigators once hostilities commenced, generally it was relied largely upon American accounts and did quasi-chivalric sentiments, notions of Christian little research on efforts at amelioration from the conduct, and a sense of humanitarian obligation British perspective. that moderated treatment of prisoners, allowing, for example, parole for officers and sometimes for Coverage has emphasized British cruelty, enlisted personnel and care for sick and wounded citing accounts of internees such as that edited by soldiers. Therein, most nations had basic Dr. Benjamin Waterhouse (an American medical guidelines for medical treatment, but practice officer) and American deaths at the hands of depended very much on available resources and guards at Dartmoor Prison in England during a the host country’s attitudes. British military policy riot in April 1815,2 while ignoring more positive provided for such treatment, which in North elements, such as medical care. America was nominally similar to that elsewhere, but pragmatism and local circumstances shaped This article explores British medical care the structure of care both in combat and in for American prisoners of war in terms of internment. organization, delivery, treatments and results, and US observations on the matter. In fact, Most prisoners coming in touch with British British medical authorities addressed problems medical authorities had sustained combat wounds in the custody system and provided humane and that needed immediate attention. Generally, compassionate medical care. Army Medical Department or regimental doctors performed these duties on land, while Royal In the absence of international codes for the Navy and Provincial Marine medical officers did treatment of prisoners and substantial provision so afloat. Memoirs and letters from the conflict for handling thousands of prisoners of war, document British medics treating captured © Canadian Military History, Volume 17, Number 1, Winter 2008, pp.49-62. 49 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2008 1 Newfield - Medical Care of US POWs.indd 49 14/02/2008 12:58:10 PM Canadian Military History, Vol. 17 [2008], Iss. 1, Art. 5 Courtesy Parks Canada “Visite des malades” by Eugène Lelièpvre A British officer inspecting the sick in hospital, 1813. British and American officers appointed as agents at internment facilities monitored the health of American prisoners and arranged for medical treatment. Americans. Assistant Surgeon William “Tiger” the only medical officer on the Island I had my Dunlop of the British 89th Regiment wrote about hands full for half an hour on their arrival.4 doing so at the siege of Fort Erie in 1814: Measures such as long-term hospitalization, After the action was over, and it was drawing re-dressing of wounds, and surgery following towards dusk, I rapidly traversed the ground, complications took place later. If casualties and finding only a few of the enemy, I ordered overwhelmed medical services, the British them to be carried to the hospital, but I preceded them to make preparations for their reception. could parole and repatriate enemy casualties When nearing the Camp, I found a party of the for treatment, as they did after the Battle of band of our Regiment carrying an American Queenston Heights.5 In January 1814, Assistant officer mortally wounded…I ordered them to lay Surgeon Alexander Ogilvie of the Royal Artillery him down, and set myself to dress his wound.3 advocated this for two officers captured at Fort Niagara: “Lt. Balch is in a very bad state of health Assistant Surgeon William Robertson of the 49th from the wound he received which is [illegible] did likewise at Isle aux Noix, after the defeat of and that he will lose the use of his arm in American gunboats on Lake Champlain in June consequence. I found Lieut. Baldridge confined to 1813: his bed with nervous fever and understood from the garrison surgeon that he has been confined There were ten wounded & one killed of the Americans only two of our men wounded being for several months previous, he still continues in a very bad state of health.”6 50 https://scholars.wlu.ca/cmh/vol17/iss1/5 2 Newfield - Medical Care of US POWs.indd 50 14/02/2008 12:58:11 PM Newfield: Medical Care of POWs If circumstances forbade such an exchange, built a prisoner-of-war camp at Melville Island authorities forwarded patients to detention in 1803 to house French prisoners captured in facilities at Quebec and at Halifax to complete North American waters, and the facility remained their convalescence and await their ultimate fate. operational in 1812. Captain Kempt (Royal When prisoners were interned, medical treatment Navy agent for prisoners at Quebec) wrote to Sir officially became the responsibility of the Royal George Prevost’s staff in June 1813: “Halifax is Navy; its Transport Board superintended delivery an old and well established depot where every of troops and materiel to British forces around necessary store has been sent from England, and the globe and also interned and maintained a medical officer appointed by the board.”10 prisoners, having in 1796 taken over the latter tasks from the Admiralty’s Sick and Hurt Board, In response to complaints about conditions which had sustained charges of neglecting at Melville Island, Lieutenant William Miller, prisoners. the Royal Navy’s prisoner agent at Halifax admonished prisoners by reminding them of the The Transport Board employed a naval availability of medical care: “There is a surgeon officer as agent for prisoners at each internment here for you if you are sick, and physic for you to facility, and he supervised their welfare and take if you are sick, and a hospital to go to into the administration. An American officer or diplomat bargain … and if you are not satisfied with this, was also appointed by either the Transport you may die and be d---d.”11 Although supplies Board or the American government (depending and infrastructure were apparently adequate, on circumstances) as the U.S. agent to liaise with British authorities and arrange medical treatment when necessary. The Transport Board’s policy regarding sick prisoners was as follows: “Sick prisoners have the option of going to the Hospitals at the regular [i.e. British military] depots for Medical or Surgical Treatment.”7 It also defined standards of medical care and emphasized that “Sick Prisoners in confinement are treated in every respect the same as Sick Seamen of the Royal Navy.”8 Archives of Ontario, S.17142 Although the general process of medical care for prisoners of war seemed straightforward, in British North America conditions made it very complex. A System in Crisis roblems within the prisoner-of-war system Pand medical departments caused confusion and inefficiency and hampered the efforts of British medical officers. West of Halifax, increasingly makeshift arrangements emerged for internment and long-term care. The key problem was control by the Transport Board, which concentrated on its supply duties.9 Most of British North America’s infrastructure for prisoners of war was in Halifax, the Royal Navy’s primary base on this continent. The navy had Assistant Surgeon William “Tiger” Dunlop, 89th Regiment. Dunlop treated wounded Americans following several engagements in Upper Canada. 51 Published by Scholars Commons @ Laurier, 2008 3 Newfield - Medical Care of US POWs.indd 51 14/02/2008 12:58:11 PM Canadian Military History, Vol. 17 [2008], Iss. 1, Art. 5 History Collection, Nova Scotia Museum “Melville Island from the North East” by J.E. Woolford, 1817. The prisoners’ hospital is in this view to the left of and partly obscured by the hill upon which the commandant’s quarters sits. rivalry between physicians occasionally caused Hospital Establishment can be formed by an difficulties. In 1814 Surgeon Rowlands (chief of order from home.”14 the naval hospital at the Halifax dockyard, whom some called a drunken bully) arranged for the Yet the army’s medical establishment could dismissal of the competent and well-respected do little to assist. In Lower Canada, it was short Surgeon Hume, who had served at Melville Island of medical staff. Writing from Isle aux Noix in for more than a decade.12 1813, Assistant Surgeon Robertson complained: “All winter I had charge of a General Hospital at Still, the Transport Board had failed to St Johns [St.
Recommended publications
  • Canadian Archæology. an Essay
    UC-NRLF Digitized by tine Internet Arciiive in 2008 with funding from IVIicrosoft Corporation littp://www.archive.org/details/canadianarcholOOkingrich : Canadian Archeology, AN ESSAY. WILLIAM KIXGSFORD. MONTREAL WM. DRYSDALE & CO., 232 ST. JAMES STREET. 1886. ! ! Ach Gott ! die Kunst ist lang, Und kurz ist unser Leben. Mir wird, bei meinem kritischen Bestreben, Doch oft um Kopf und Busen bang. Wie schwer sind niclit die Mittel zu erwerben, Durch die man zu den Quellen steigt Und eh' man nur den halben Weg erreicht Musz wohl eiu armer Teufel sterben. Goethe, Faust. Ah me ! but art is long And human life is short. Oft in the throes of critic thought Have head and heart ceased to be strong. How hard the means which in our effort lie To reach the sources of what mortals know, But ere a man can half the distance go Verily, poor devil, must he die. Your home born projects prove ever the best ; they are so easy and familiar ; they put too much learning in their things now-a-days. Ben Johnson, Bartholomew Fair, Ist das Licht das Eigenthum der Flamme, wo nicht gar des Ker- zendochts? Ich enthalte mich jedes Urtheils liber solche Frage, und freue mich nur dariiber, dass Ihr dem armen Dochte, der sich brennend verzehrt, eine kleine Vergiitung verwilligen wolt fiir sein groszes gemeinnittziges Beleuchtungsverdienst Heine. Is the light the property of the flame, if it in no wa,Y be of the taper wick ? I abstain from any judgment over such a question, and I only rejoice that you are willing to make some slight amends to the poor wick, which consumes itself in burning, for its noble, universal, merit- orious service of enlightenment ! Canadian Archeology.
    [Show full text]
  • Provincial Plaques Across Ontario
    An inventory of provincial plaques across Ontario Last updated: May 25, 2021 An inventory of provincial plaques across Ontario Title Plaque text Location County/District/ Latitude Longitude Municipality "Canada First" Movement, Canada First was the name and slogan of a patriotic movement that At the entrance to the Greater Toronto Area, City of 43.6493473 -79.3802768 The originated in Ottawa in 1868. By 1874, the group was based in Toronto and National Club, 303 Bay Toronto (District), City of had founded the National Club as its headquarters. Street, Toronto Toronto "Cariboo" Cameron 1820- Born in this township, John Angus "Cariboo" Cameron married Margaret On the grounds of his former Eastern Ontario, United 45.05601541 -74.56770762 1888 Sophia Groves in 1860. Accompanied by his wife and daughter, he went to home, Fairfield, which now Counties of Stormont, British Columbia in 1862 to prospect in the Cariboo gold fields. That year at houses Legionaries of Christ, Dundas and Glengarry, Williams Creek he struck a rich gold deposit. While there his wife died of County Road 2 and County Township of South Glengarry typhoid fever and, in order to fulfil her dying wish to be buried at home, he Road 27, west of transported her body in an alcohol-filled coffin some 8,600 miles by sea via Summerstown the Isthmus of Panama to Cornwall. She is buried in the nearby Salem Church cemetery. Cameron built this house, "Fairfield", in 1865, and in 1886 returned to the B.C. gold fields. He is buried near Barkerville, B.C. "Colored Corps" 1812-1815, Anxious to preserve their freedom and prove their loyalty to Britain, people of On Queenston Heights, near Niagara Falls and Region, 43.160132 -79.053059 The African descent living in Niagara offered to raise their own militia unit in 1812.
    [Show full text]
  • The Historical Significance of General Sir Isaac Brock: Part 2
    War of 1812, Historical Thinking Lesson 12 The Historical Significance of General Sir Isaac Brock: Part 2 by Elizabeth Freeman-Shaw Suggested grade level: Intermediate/Senior Suggested time: 2 class periods Brief Description of the Task In this lesson students will explore why General Sir Isaac Brock is considered to be historically significant, and wrestle with whether or not he should be. Historical Thinking Concepts • Historical Significance • Use of Evidence (primary and secondary) Learning Goals Students will be able to: • participate in an activity that allows them to understand the concept of historical significance • identify the role and historical significance of General Sir Isaac Brock in the War of 1812 • review secondary accounts of Isaac Brock to determine the case for significance • synthesize data into qualities of greatness • use excerpts from primary sources to determine the validity of historians’ conclusions. Materials Each student will need copies of all Primary Sources and Worksheets (in the Appendices file). Prior Knowledge It would be an asset for students to be familiar with: The Historical Thinking Project, 2012 War of 1812, Historical Thinking Lesson 12 1. Earlier events leading up to the declaration of war, key personalities, the political structure of British North America, and the causes of the war. 2. The concept of historical significance (See The Historical Thinking Project website, http://www.historicalthinking.ca/concept/historical- significance) Assessment Students may be evaluated based on the work completed with: • Worksheet 1 – Decoding Secondary Sources • Worksheet 2 – Note-taking, Secondary Sources • Worksheet 3 – Examining Primary Sources Detailed Lesson Plan Focus Question: Why is it that even though General Brock was killed in the early hours of the Battle of Queenston Heights and Colonel Roger Sheaffe lead the British forces to victory, Brock is more remembered than Sheaffe? Part A – Exploring a Controversy 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Brockton's Name Recalls Isaac Brock's Cousin James
    The Newsletter of the Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common v. 13 No. 1 Mar. 2009 1 Brockton’s Name Recalls Isaac Brock’s 6 Administrator’s Report Cousin James 6 Council Approves Design Team for 3 Henry Bowyer Lane’s Fort at Toronto, 1842 June Callwood Park 3 Conversation with Colin Upton 7 First Steps to Renewing the Fort 4 In Review 8 Upcoming Events 5 New Committee Chair Brockton’s Name Recalls Isaac Brock’s Cousin James Dan Brock, John England, Gillian Lenfestey, Stephen Otto, Guy St-Denis and Stuart Sutherland contributed to this article. Many ordinary people enjoy more than Andy Warhol’s fifteen minutes of fame before resuming their modest lives. James Brock’s time in the limelight of Upper Canada lasted about fifteen months from October 1811 until late 1812, but left a lasting mark on Toronto. Paradoxically, his imprint on the city in the name of ‘Brockton’ has proven more indelible than Brock Street, as lower Spadina was called until 1884 in honour of his famous kinsman, Sir Isaac Brock. Frequently said to be Isaac’s brother or nephew, James was actually a first cousin. Isaac’s father John and James’s father Henry were brothers. James was born at St. Peter Port, Guernsey, on April 3 1773, to Henry Brock and Suzanne de Sausmarez, both members of prominent families. He was raised in comfortable circumstances in “Belmont,” a large house with extensive grounds, and likely began his education in one of the local clergy-run schools where he was taught in French, the working language on the island until the late 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • ONTARIO (Canada) Pagina 1 Di 3 ONTARIO Denominato Dal Lago Ontario, Che Prese Il Suo Nome Da Un Linguaggio Nativo Americano
    ONTARIO (Canada) ONTARIO Denominato dal Lago Ontario, che prese il suo nome da un linguaggio nativo americano, derivante da onitariio=lago bellissimo, oppure kanadario=bellissimo, oppure ancora dall’urone ontare=lago. A FRANCIA 1604-1763 A GB 1763-1867 - Parte del Quebec 1763-1791 - Come Upper Canada=Canada Superiore=Alto Canada 24/08/1791-23/07/1840 (effettivamente dal 26/12/1791) - Come Canada Ovest=West Canada 23/07/1840-01/07/1867 (effettivo dal 5/02/1841) (unito al Canada Est nella PROVINCIA DEL CANADA) - Garantito Responsabilità di Governo 11/03/1848-1867 PROVINCIA 1/07/1867- Luogotenenti-Governatori GB 08/07/1792-10/04/1796 John GRAVES SIMCOE (1752+1806) 20/07/1796-17/08/1799 Peter RUSSELL (f.f.)(1733+1808) 17/08/1799-11/09/1805 Peter HUNTER (1746+1805) 11/09/1805-25/08/1806 Alexander GRANT (f.f.)(1734+1813) 25/08/1806-09/10/1811 Francis GORE (1°)(1769+1852) 09/10/1811-13/10/1812 Sir Isaac BROCK (f.f.)(1769+1812) 13/10/1812-19/06/1813 Sir Roger HALE SHEAFFE (f.f.)(1763+1851) 19/06/1813-13/12/1813 Francis DE ROTTENBURG, BARON DE ROTTENBURG (f.f.) (1757+1832) 13/12/1813-25/04/1815 Sir Gordon DRUMMOND (f.f.)(1771+1854) 25/04/1815-01/07/1815 Sir George MURRAY (Provvisorio)(1772-1846) 01/07/1815-21/09/1815 Sir Frederick PHILIPSE ROBINSON (Provvisorio)(1763+1852) 21/09/1815-06/01/1817 Francis GORE (2°) 11/06/1817-13/08/1818 Samuel SMITH (f.f.)(1756+1826) 13/08/1818-23/08/1828 Sir Peregrine MAITLAND (1777+1854) 04/11/1828-26/01/1836 Sir John COLBORNE (1778+1863) 26/01/1836-23/03/1838 Sir Francis BOND HEAD (1793+1875) 05/12/1837-07/12/1837
    [Show full text]
  • The Many Faces of Fort George National Historic Site of Canada: Insights Into a Historic Fort’S Transformation
    Northeast Historical Archaeology Volume 44 Special Issue: War of 1812 Article 7 2015 The aM ny Faces of Fort George National Historic Site of Canada: Insights into a Historic Fort’s Transformation Barbara Leskovec Follow this and additional works at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/neha Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons Recommended Citation Leskovec, Barbara (2015) "The aM ny Faces of Fort George National Historic Site of Canada: Insights into a Historic Fort’s Transformation," Northeast Historical Archaeology: Vol. 44 44, Article 7. Available at: https://orb.binghamton.edu/neha/vol44/iss1/7 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). It has been accepted for inclusion in Northeast Historical Archaeology by an authorized editor of The Open Repository @ Binghamton (The ORB). For more information, please contact [email protected]. Northeast Historical Archaeology/Vol. 44, 2015 119 The Many Faces of Fort George National Historic Site of Canada: Insights into a Historic Fort’s Transformation Barbara Leskovec Fort George National Historic Site of Canada is situated in the picturesque town of Niagara-on-the-Lake, Ontario, Canada. Constructed by the British following the capitulation of Fort Niagara, Fort George is of national historic significance because it served as the Headquarters of the Central Division of the British Army, and played a crucial role in the defence of Upper Canada during the War of 1812. Archaeological investigations in the last 50 years have shed light on the fort’s early structures and modifications. In 2009, funding allocated through the Federal Economic Action Plan provided an opportunity to further explore the fort’s historic transformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Poles in the Regiment De Watteville and Regiment De Meuron During the War of 1812
    The War of 1812 Magazine Issue 18, June 2012 From the Battlegrounds of Canada to the Red River Colony: Poles in the Regiment De Watteville and Regiment De Meuron during the War of 1812 By Stan Skrzeszewski and Amanda Jankowski Uniform of Captain Jean Ployart, De Watteville Regiment. More than 500 Poles served in this regiment during the War of 1812. The uniform is on display at Fort George, Niagara-on-the-Lake (Christoff’s Gallery took all the photographs in this article) Introduction This project started from the premise that any good war that came after the elimination of Poland from the map of Europe in 1795 had to include some Poles. Since that time there have been no major wars that have not included Poles fighting for freedom. In 1794 after the defeat of the Kościusko uprising many Polish patriots went forth following the slogan that took them all the way to the Battle of Monte Cassino in 1944 “to fight for our freedom and yours.”1 I was not disappointed when I applied this assumption to the War of 1812 in North America. A substantial number of Poles took part. Most of the written history on the War of 1812 was and is done from two perspectives – the British/Canadian and the American. Very little of the written history reflects the perspective of the Native peoples who were major participants in the war, the Black participants and the Coloured Corps and the numerous Europeans who also fought in the conflict. This paper can be said to bring a Slavic perspective to the War of 1812, but it also brings in other marginalized warriors in curious ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum HLF Development Update
    2016-2017 In this issue: Friends of The ·HLF Development ·Website update ·Artwork Conservation ·Foster Medal Collection ·Rothbury Trenches ·Visitors, Volunteers and Activities ·General Sir Roger Hale Sheaffe ·Upcoming Lectures Museum HLF Development Update His Grace the Duke of Upstairs, Downstairs Northumberland formally A special virtual tour of the reopened the museum on museum's three floors has 24th of June 2016, the increased the accessibility of the Anniversary of the Battle of displays for everyone. Wilhelmstahl (1762), at a Reception to celebrate Filmed by InfoAktiv, the tour completion of the new allows visitors who are unable to displays on the two upper manage the stairs to visit the floors and to thank our upper floors at the touch of a funders and everyone who screen. Touching one of the virtual worked on the project. tour's 15 'hot spots‘ brings up a rotating image of the selected The first phase of the object together with information redevelopment was a special about it. centenary exhibition commemorating the role of “An excellent museum, my the Northumberland Fusiliers wife was fascinated” Visitor in the First World War. It was survey comment, June 2017 presented on the ground floor for three seasons from 2014. “The Fusiliers museum is Aden remembered excellent and makes you 2017 marks the 50th proud” eldorado2015, Anniversary of the Aden Tripadvisor, summer 2015 Mutiny. “Incident on Temple Cliffs” by The final phase is now Terence Cuneo depicts the complete, retelling the actions of Fusilier John Duffy Regiment’s 350 year history who was awarded the with themes representing the Distinguished Conduct Medal for everyday life of a soldier over rescuing the pilot of a helicopter three floors of new displays.
    [Show full text]
  • 6 Dec 2013 Brown & Lake Ontario
    Pike National Historic Trail Association Newsletter zebulonpike.org December 2013 Vol. 7 No 6 Browns Canyon & Exploring of the Arkansas River Headwaters Dec. 1806 www. by Allan Vainley On Wednesday, December 10, 1806, Pike had decided to leave the Cañon City, CO stockade site to travel north to explore what is now southern South Park, CO. They discovered the South Platte headwaters. After leaving their “Hartsel (Santa Maria)” site, they traveled southwest down Trout Creek into the Arkansas River Valley to the mouth Our website is Our website of Trout Ck. (Arkansas River) just south of Buena Vista on Dec. 19 in the light of the snow-capped 14,000 ft Collegiate Mountain range. On Dec. 20, he wrote: “As there was no prospect of killing any game, it was necessary that the party should leave that place, I therefore determined that the doctor and Baroney should descend the river in the morning; that myself and two men (Miller and Mountjoy) would ascend and the rest of the party descend after the doctor until they obtained provision and could wait for me.” On Dec. 22, the three found the headwaters of the “Arkansaw”. On the 23rd they marched early back south down river and “at two oʼclock, P.M. discovered the trace of the party” and followed it into Brownʼs Canyon, “until some time in the night, when we arrived at the second nights encampment of the party. Our cloathing was frozen stiff, and we ourselves were considerably benumbed.” The encampment was beside the confluence of Brownʼs Creek and the Arkansas in Browns Canyon.
    [Show full text]
  • The Explosion of the Grand Magazine
    The Newsletter of the Friends of Fort York and Garrison Common v. 12 No. 2 July 2008 1 The Explosion of the Grand Magazine 5 A Tribute to Robert Nurse 3 Archaeological Legacies at Fort York 6 On Guard: A Short History of the 3 The Best of Times Fort York Guard, 1934-1978 8 4 In Review Upcoming Events Ka-Boom!!! The Explosion of the Grand Magazine by Robert Malcomson By 1 pm on Tuesday, 27 April 1813, the American force attacking York had victory within its grasp. And then an explosion ripped the earth and rained death upon the advancing column as the grand magazine near the British garrison blew up. A stone block ended Brigadier General Zebulon Pike’s career with a fatal blow. Thirty-eight others were killed and 224 were wounded, some of whom survived for only days. Descriptions of the debris that fell on the American column provided the first Plan of Fort York 1816, by G. Nicolls. The crater left after the explosion of the Grand Magazine is illustrated as a circular information about the actual indentation along the south west embankment directly south of the southern ramparts. (LAC, NMC 23139) construction of the magazine. ‘At first the air was darkened with stones, rafters and clay,’ wrote artillery officer Major Abraham Eustis. Aide-de-camp to Major General Henry Dearborn, Lieutenant Colonel Samuel Conner, referred to ‘Cart loads of stone, and an immense quantity of iron, shell and shot.’ Some of the Americans thought the British had laid a mine beneath the approach to the garrison for the purpose of destroying a marching column.
    [Show full text]
  • The True Face of Sir Isaac Brock
    University of Calgary PRISM: University of Calgary's Digital Repository University of Calgary Press University of Calgary Press Open Access Books 2018-10 The True Face of Sir Isaac Brock St-Denis, Guy University of Calgary Press St-Denis, G. (2018). The True Face of Sir Isaac Brock. Calgary, AB. University of Calgary Press. http://hdl.handle.net/1880/108892 book https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0 Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives 4.0 International Downloaded from PRISM: https://prism.ucalgary.ca THE TRUE FACE OF SIR ISAAC BROCK by Guy St-Denis ISBN 978-1-77385-021-4 THIS BOOK IS AN OPEN ACCESS E-BOOK. It is an electronic version of a book that can be purchased in physical form through any bookseller or on-line retailer, or from our distributors. Please support this open access publication by requesting that your university purchase a print copy of this book, or by purchasing a copy yourself. If you have any questions, please contact us at [email protected] Cover Art: The artwork on the cover of this book is not open access and falls under traditional copyright provisions; it cannot be reproduced in any way without written permission of the artists and their agents. The cover can be displayed as a complete cover image for the purposes of publicizing this work, but the artwork cannot be extracted from the context of the cover of this specific work without breaching the artist’s copyright. COPYRIGHT NOTICE: This open-access work is published under a Creative Commons licence.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of York (1813)
    The Battle of York (1813) As the War of 1812 entered its second year, the government in Washington was hungry for victory, and that meant the conquest of all, or a significant part, of British Canada. American leaders realized that, if their armed forces could capture either Montreal or Quebec, they would win the conflict. Even with Great Britain deeply involved in the long Napoleonic conflict in Europe, those cities were too well-defended. So, as a kind of lesser reward, President James Madison and his advisors decided on a campaign to take Kingston on the eastern side; then move on to seize York on the western side of Lake Ontario, which is modern day Toronto; and cooperate with an offensive from Buffalo to secure control over the Niagara frontier, thereby cutting off Upper Canada [western Ontario] from the rest of the colony. Fighting in 1812 along the Niagara frontier had ended badly for the Americans. The U.S. government also hoped another offensive would recapture Detroit and make up for its loss in 1812, restoring the balance in Michigan and the West. The U.S. government appointed Major General Henry Dearborn to lead the invasion. Invading required a degree of decisiveness, of aggression, and Dearborn was timid. The idea was to attack before ice on the St. Lawrence melted, thereby allowing Britain to bring reinforcements upriver. Moving from Plattsburgh on Lake Champlain to the eastern end of Lake Ontario, Dearborn overestimated British defenses at Kingston on the eastern side of Lake Ontario - claiming that General George Prevost had in excess of 6,000 regular troops, going so far as to predict a major British invasion of Sackett’s Harbor across the lake.
    [Show full text]