Prediction of Phase Equilibria for Refrigerant Mixtures Of

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Prediction of Phase Equilibria for Refrigerant Mixtures Of 7632 J. Phys. Chem. B 1998, 102, 7632-7639 Prediction of Phase Equilibria for Refrigerant Mixtures of Difluoromethane (HFC-32), 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), and Pentafluoroethane (HFC-125a) Using SAFT-VR Amparo Galindo,† Alejandro Gil-Villegas,‡ Paul J. Whitehead, and George Jackson*,† Department of Chemistry, UniVersity of Sheffield, Sheffield S3 7HF, U.K. Andrew N. Burgess Research and Technology, ICI Chemicals and Polymers, PO Box 8, The Heath, Runcorn, Cheshire WA7 4QD, U.K. ReceiVed: January 29, 1998; In Final Form: July 1, 1998 The statistical associating fluid theory for chain molecules with attractive potentials of variable range (SAFT- VR) is used to model the phase equilibria for three binary mixtures formed by difluoromethane (HFC-32), 1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane (HFC-134a), and pentafluoroethane (HFC-125a). Molecules are represented as chains of spherical segments with short-ranged attractive sites. The intermolecular van der Waals forces are modeled with variable-range square-wells. The optimized values of the parameters of the model are obtained by fitting to experimental data for the vapor pressures and saturated liquid densities of each of the pure components. These parameters are the number and diameters of the spherical segments and the strengths and ranges of the potentials describing the site-site and segment-segment interactions. Using the values of the pure-component parameters and standard combining rules, the phase equilibrium of the mixtures is described very accurately. SAFT-VR improves the predictive power of mean-field versions of SAFT. Introduction The HFCs do not contain chlorine atoms, have a zero ozone depletion potential, and have lifetimes of the order of 10 times Chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs) are stable, nontoxic compounds, shorter than those of the CFCs. The thermodynamical properties 1 first used as refrigerants in 1930, when they replaced the toxic of pure HFCs have been extensively measured over the past 10 fluids that were used as coolants in refrigeration systems years and are well-known; it now seems likely that blends of (CH3Cl, SO2,NH3,CH2CH2, and hydrocarbons). They have a new refrigerants rather than pure substances will replace the very good refrigerating performance, and their nontoxic nature common CFCs; e.g., mixtures of HFC-32 (difluoromethane), encouraged widespread industrial applications, being used as HFC134a (1,1,1,2-tetrafluoroethane), HFC-125 (pentafluoroet- foam-blowing agents for polystyrene and polyurethane, solvents, hane), and HFC-152a (1,1-difluoroethane) are used in air and cleaning agents over the following 50 years. Their stability, conditioning systems. The number of mixtures of HFCs however, causes them to reach the stratosphere where they potentially viable as replacements for the old CFCs is, however, eventually decompose under solar ultraviolet radiation releasing very extensive. Equilibrium experimental data is available for chlorine radicals that react with ozone molecules (O3) to yield a small number of mixtures and only over limited ranges of 2 molecular oxygen O2. Molina and Rowland were the first to temperature and pressure. Further, the synthesis of the replace- suggest a connection between the CFCs in the stratosphere and ment refrigerants requires separation processes involving mul- the depletion of the ozone layer, a hypothesis that was confirmed ticomponent mixtures of these compounds and various other in the late 70s and early 80s. A detailed account on the role of components. It becomes then of crucial importance to develop chlorine in stratospheric chemistry can be found in a recent paper reliable theoretical models to predict the phase equilibria and by Molina.3 other thermodynamical properties of such mixtures. The Montreal Protocol of 1987 provided the first international Several equations of state (EOSs) have already been used in agreement limiting the production of CFCs worldwide. It the prediction and correlation of experimental data of refrigerant initially called only for a 50% reduction in the manufacture of systems. In a recent paper Gow4 reviews the achievements of CFCs by the year 2000. The London and Copenhagen amend- two- and three-parameter cubic EOSs in the description of such ments of 1990 and 1992 strengthened the ban to ask for a mixtures. He uses a three-parameter cubic equation with a phaseout of production by the end of 1995. CFCs are now being temperature-dependent attractive term to correlate binary vapor- replaced by hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs) and hydrofluo- liquid equilibrium data and extends it to predict the phase rocarbons (HFCs); the presence of the hydrogen atoms allows equilibria of a ternary refrigerant mixture. Good agreement with water-soluble compounds to be formed, which are removed from experimental data is found, although only one isotherm of the the atmosphere by rainfall. ternary mixture is studied. Obey and Sandler5 have examined several refrigerant mixtures with a cubic EOS and a number of † Current address: Department of Chemical Engineering and Chemical mixing rules taking special interest in the predicting capabilities Technology, Imperial College of Science Technology and Medicine, of their approach for extended ranges of temperature. University of London, Prince Consort Road, London SW7 2BY. ‡ Current address: Instituto de Fı´sica, Universidad de Guanajuato, Leo´n Cubic EOSs coupled with group contribution methods have 37150, Mexico. also been extensively used to study the phase equilibria of binary S1089-5647(98)00943-2 CCC: $15.00 © 1998 American Chemical Society Published on Web 09/09/1998 Phase Equilibria for Refrigerant Mixtures J. Phys. Chem. B, Vol. 102, No. 39, 1998 7633 mixtures. The fundamental assumption of the group contribu- tion methods is that the properties of a molecular group are the same in every molecule and have no influence on other segments. On the basis of this idea the thermodynamic properties of new substances are predicted with a database of the interaction parameters of the “groups” involved. The interaction parameters for the different “groups” are obtained by comparisons with experimental data. It should be noted, however, that the assumption of a new molecular group with no influence on other segments of a molecule is rarely true. Barolo et al.6 used the Soave-Redlich-Kwong EOS with a group contribution method derived from UNIFAC to study mixtures of refrigerants and proposed a list of groups and subgroups for CFCs, HCFCs, HFCs, and FCs. Similarly, Kleiber7 has extended the UNIFAC group assignment with the UNIQUAC equation to deal with replacement refrigerants; 10 Figure 1. Models for (a) HFC-32, (b) HFC-134a and HFC-R125. A new groups were described. number of off-center square-well sites are placed on a sphere of diameter 8 σi. The sites are placed at a distance rd from the centre of the sphere Blindenbach et al. used the perturbed anisotropic chain theory and have a cut-off range r . The two different types of sites are 9,10 c (PACT) developed by Vimalchand and Donohue, in order colored white and grey; only white-grey bonding is allowed. The white to model the thermodynamic properties of pure CFCs and and grey sites interact with a hydrogen-bonding energy hb when the - - HCFCs, and the vapor liquid equilibria of their mixtures, site site distance is less than rc. HFC-32 is modeled with a single including mixtures with hydrocarbons. PACT is an EOS that hard sphere (m ) 1 ) and HFC-134a and HFC-125 are modeled with ) ) takes into account dispersion, polar, and induced polar interac- two overlapping hard spheres (m 1.4 and m 1.35, respectively). Long-range dispersion interactions are modelled via a high-temperature tions. On the basis of pure component parameters, very good perturbation expansion for a site-site square-well potential of depth agreement with experimental data was found and better predic- and range λ. tive results than the ones obtained with cubic equations of state. 11 Economou et al. have measured the properties of the mixture that is in very good agreement with experimental data for + HFC-22 (chlorodifluoro ethane) HFC-134a up to the critical strongly associated systems such as the mixtures containing region and have compared their data with PACT, obtaining very hydrogen fluoride. SAFT-VR introduces a more accurate good agreement. The statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT) description of the thermodynamics due to attractive van der also takes into account the anisotropies of the fluid, both due Waals forces by using a second-order perturbation theory. With to molecular shape and to directional forces. In the SAFT this approach is possible to describe mixtures of refrigerants in approach the free energy can be written as separate contribu- a more accurate way than the simplified SAFT-HS approach, tions, describing the effects of molecular shape, dispersion as we will show in this paper. forces, and molecular association. In the original SAFT approach,12,13 the molecules are modeled as chains of Lennard- Jones segments, with embedded short-range sites to describe 2. Models and Theory association. In its many versions, the SAFT approach has been used to examine a wide range of fluids, from linear small alkanes It is useful to illustrate the models used in the description of - to polymeric fluids (see refs 14 16 and references therein). An these molecules with the SAFT-VR approach and then give a extended version of the SAFT equation, which accounts for short reminder of the specific equations involved in each of explicit contributions to the free energy due to dipolar interac- the mixtures. The comparison with experimental data is 17 tions (based on previous work of Mu¨ller and Gubbins and presented in the following section. 18 the well-known Pade´ approximation due to Stell et al. ), was 2.1. Models. We model our molecules as hard-spherical 19,20 recently used by Kraska and Gubbins to study the phase cores formed from tangentially bonded segments of diameter σ equilibria of mixtures of alcohols.
Recommended publications
  • 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane
    This report contains the collective views of an international group of experts and does not necessarily represent the decisions or the stated policy of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, or the World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 11 1,1,1,2-Tetrafluoroethane First draft prepared by Mrs P. Barker and Mr R. Cary, Health and Safety Executive, Liverpool, United Kingdom, and Dr S. Dobson, Institute of Terrestrial Ecology, Huntingdon, United Kingdom Please not that the layout and pagination of this pdf file are not identical to the printed CICAD Published under the joint sponsorship of the United Nations Environment Programme, the International Labour Organisation, and the World Health Organization, and produced within the framework of the Inter-Organization Programme for the Sound Management of Chemicals. World Health Organization Geneva, 1998 The International Programme on Chemical Safety (IPCS), established in 1980, is a joint venture of the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), the International Labour Organisation (ILO), and the World Health Organization (WHO). The overall objectives of the IPCS are to establish the scientific basis for assessment of the risk to human health and the environment from exposure to chemicals, through international peer review processes, as a prerequisite for the promotion of chemical safety, and to provide technical assistance in strengthening national capacities for the sound management of chemicals. The Inter-Organization
    [Show full text]
  • SAFETY DATA SHEET Difluoromethane (R32) SECTION 1
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Difluoromethane (R32) Issue Date: 16.01.2013 Version: 1.1 SDS No.: 000010021734 Last revised date: 26.11.2018 1/14 SECTION 1: Identification of the substance/mixture and of the company/undertaking 1.1 Product identifier Product name: Difluoromethane (R32) Other Name: HFC-32 Additional identification Chemical name: Difluoromethane Chemical formula: CH2F2 INDEX No. - CAS-No. 75-10-5 EC No. 200-839-4 REACH Registration No. 01-2119471312-47 1.2 Relevant identified uses of the substance or mixture and uses advised against Identified uses: Industrial and professional. Perform risk assessment prior to use. Refrigerant. Use as an Intermediate (transported, on-site isolated). Use for electronic component manufacture. Using gas alone or in mixtures for the calibration of analysis equipment. Formulation of mixtures with gas in pressure receptacles. Uses advised against Consumer use. 1.3 Details of the supplier of the safety data sheet Supplier Linde Gas GmbH Telephone: +43 50 4273 Carl-von-Linde-Platz 1 A-4651 Stadl-Paura E-mail: [email protected] 1.4 Emergency telephone number: Emergency number Linde: + 43 50 4273 (during business hours), Poisoning Information Center: +43 1 406 43 43 SECTION 2: Hazards identification 2.1 Classification of the substance or mixture Classification according to Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008 as amended. Physical Hazards Flammable gas Category 1 H220: Extremely flammable gas. Gases under pressure Liquefied gas H280: Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. SDS_AT - 000010021734 SAFETY DATA SHEET Difluoromethane (R32) Issue Date: 16.01.2013 Version: 1.1 SDS No.: 000010021734 Last revised date: 26.11.2018 2/14 2.2 Label Elements Signal Words: Danger Hazard Statement(s): H220: Extremely flammable gas.
    [Show full text]
  • Liquefied Gas Conversion Chart
    LIQUEFIED GAS CONVERSION CHART Cubic Feet / Pound Pounds / Gallon Product Name Column A Column B Acetylene UN/NA: 1001 14.70 4.90 CAS: 514-86-2 Air UN/NA: 1002 13.30 7.29 CAS: N/A Ammonia Anhydrous UN/NA: 1005 20.78 5.147 CAS: 7664-41-7 Argon UN/NA: 1006 9.71 11.63 CAS: 7440-37-1 Butane UN/NA: 1075 6.34 4.86 CAS: 106-97-8 Carbon Dioxide UN/NA: 2187 8.74 8.46 CAS: 124-38-9 Chlorine UN/NA: 1017 5.38 11.73 CAS: 7782-50-5 Ethane UN/NA: 1045 12.51 2.74 CAS: 74-84-0 Ethylene Oxide UN/NA: 1040 8.78 7.25 CAS: 75-21-8 Fluorine UN/NA: 1045 10.17 12.60 CAS: 7782-41-4 Helium UN/NA: 1046 97.09 1.043 CAS: 7440-59-7 Hydrogen UN/NA: 1049 192.00 0.592 CAS: 1333-74-0 1. Find the gas you want to convert. 2. If you know your quantity in cubic feet and want to convert to pounds, divide your amount by column A 3. If you know your quantity in gallons and want to convert to pounds, multiply your amount by column B 4. If you know your quantity in pounds and want to convert to gallons, divide your amount by column B If you have any questions, please call 1-800-433-2288 LIQUEFIED GAS CONVERSION CHART Cubic Feet / Pound Pounds / Gallon Product Name Column A Column B Hydrogen Chloride UN/NA: 1050 10.60 8.35 CAS: 7647-01-0 Krypton UN/NA: 1056 4.60 20.15 CAS: 7439-90-9 Methane UN/NA: 1971 23.61 3.55 CAS: 74-82-8 Methyl Bromide UN/NA: 1062 4.03 5.37 CAS: 74-83-9 Neon UN/NA: 1065 19.18 10.07 CAS: 7440-01-9 Mapp Gas UN/NA: 1060 9.20 4.80 CAS: N/A Nitrogen UN/NA: 1066 13.89 6.75 CAS: 7727-37-9 Nitrous Oxide UN/NA: 1070 8.73 6.45 CAS: 10024-97-2 Oxygen UN/NA: 1072 12.05 9.52 CAS: 7782-44-7 Propane UN/NA: 1075 8.45 4.22 CAS: 74-98-6 Sulfur Dioxide UN/NA: 1079 5.94 12.0 CAS: 7446-09-5 Xenon UN/NA: 2036 2.93 25.51 CAS: 7440-63-3 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Gas Conversion Factor for 300 Series
    300GasTable Rec # Gas Symbol GCF Density (g/L) Density (g/L) 25° C / 1 atm 0° C / 1 atm 1 Acetic Acid C2H4F2 0.4155 2.7 2.947 2 Acetic Anhydride C4H6O3 0.258 4.173 4.555 3 Acetone C3H6O 0.3556 2.374 2.591 4 Acetonitryl C2H3N 0.5178 1.678 1.832 5 Acetylene C2H2 0.6255 1.064 1.162 6 Air Air 1.0015 1.185 1.293 7 Allene C3H4 0.4514 1.638 1.787 8 Ammonia NH3 0.7807 0.696 0.76 9 Argon Ar 1.4047 1.633 1.782 10 Arsine AsH3 0.7592 3.186 3.478 11 Benzene C6H6 0.3057 3.193 3.485 12 Boron Trichloride BCl3 0.4421 4.789 5.228 13 Boron Triflouride BF3 0.5431 2.772 3.025 14 Bromine Br2 0.8007 6.532 7.13 15 Bromochlorodifluoromethane CBrClF2 0.3684 6.759 7.378 16 Bromodifluoromethane CHBrF2 0.4644 5.351 5.841 17 Bromotrifluormethane CBrF3 0.3943 6.087 6.644 18 Butane C4H10 0.2622 2.376 2.593 19 Butanol C4H10O 0.2406 3.03 3.307 20 Butene C4H8 0.3056 2.293 2.503 21 Carbon Dioxide CO2 0.7526 1.799 1.964 22 Carbon Disulfide CS2 0.616 3.112 3.397 23 Carbon Monoxide CO 1.0012 1.145 1.25 24 Carbon Tetrachloride CCl4 0.3333 6.287 6.863 25 Carbonyl Sulfide COS 0.668 2.456 2.68 26 Chlorine Cl2 0.8451 2.898 3.163 27 Chlorine Trifluoride ClF3 0.4496 3.779 4.125 28 Chlorobenzene C6H5Cl 0.2614 4.601 5.022 29 Chlorodifluoroethane C2H3ClF2 0.3216 4.108 4.484 30 Chloroform CHCl3 0.4192 4.879 5.326 31 Chloropentafluoroethane C2ClF5 0.2437 6.314 6.892 32 Chloropropane C3H7Cl 0.308 3.21 3.504 33 Cisbutene C4H8 0.3004 2.293 2.503 34 Cyanogen C2N2 0.4924 2.127 2.322 35 Cyanogen Chloride ClCN 0.6486 2.513 2.743 36 Cyclobutane C4H8 0.3562 2.293 2.503 37 Cyclopropane C3H6 0.4562
    [Show full text]
  • Table of Hfcs and Pfcs and Pounds of Chemicals That Trigger
    Table of HFCs and PFCs and Pounds of Chemicals that Trigger Reporting Requirements Hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) Designation Pounds of Substance = Chemical Name, Trade Names, Blends Applications CAS number GWP 10,000 metric tons Ce HFC-23 1,480 trifluoromethane Suva 95 low temperature 75-46-7 14,800 fluoroform Genetron 503 refrigerant, fire R-23 Genetron 23 extinguishant, plasma Freon 23 Klea 23 FE-13 Klea 508 etchant, semi-conductor FE-36 Klea 5R3 manufacturing cleaning Forane FX 220 NARM 503 agent HFC-32 32,660 difluoromethane R-407C component in refrigerant 75-10-5 675 methylene fluoride Klea 407A blends R-32 Klea 407B R-410A Klea 407C R-407C Klea 407D Freon 32 Klea 410A Forane 410A (AZ-20) Klea 32 Forane FX 40 Genetron 407C Forane FX 220 AZ-20 Forane 407C EcoloAce 407c Forane 32 HX4 Asahiklin SA-39 Solkane 407C Asahiklin SA-45 Solkane 410 Meforex 98 Suva 9000 Meforex 32 Suva 9100 R-410A HFC-41 227,280 methyl fluoride R-41 593-53-3 97 fluoromethane HFC-43-10mee 13,440 decafluoropentane cleaning solvent 138495-42-8 1,640 HFC-125 6,300 ethane Forane 507 pentafluoro Forane FX10 pentafluoroethane Forane FX40 R-125 Forane FX70 FC-125 Suva 125 Freon 125 Suva 9000 FE-25 Suva 9100 Arcton 402A Suva HP62 Arcton 402B Suva HP80 Arcton 408A Suva HP81 Klea 404A Cooltop R-134a Replacement Klea 407A EcoloAce 404a Klea 407B Di 44 Klea 407C Meforex 125 Klea 407D Meforex 55 Klea 410A Meforex 57 Klea 507A Meforex 98 Asahiklin SA-28 ISCEON 29 Asahiklin SA-39 ISCEON 404A Asahiklin SA-45 ISCEON 507 AZ-20 ISCEON 59 AZ-50 ISCEON 79 Genetron 404A ISCEON 89 Genetron
    [Show full text]
  • R32 Common Questions
    Frequently Asked Questions 1. How will the new F-gas regulation affect the choice of refrigerant for heat pump air conditioners? Heat pump air conditioning systems are impacted by the new F-gas regulation, the gradual phase down of HFC’s quantities on the market will push the industry to use lower GWP refrigerants. Since 2017 the price of HFC’s has started to rise significantly, especially for those gases with high Global Warming Potential (GWP). Note: In the new F-gas regulation, the use of HFC’s with GWP greater than 750 will be prohibited from 2025 for mono split-system room air conditioners containing less than 3 kg of refrigerant. 2. What is Toshiba’s refrigerant of choice as a replacement for R-410A heat pump air conditioners? R-410A alternatives must provide an acceptable compromise in terms of GWP, human safety, energy efficiency, and system cost. After several years of research and evaluation, Toshiba along with other air conditioner manufacturers are switching from R-410A to R-32 (Difluoromethane HFC32) refrigerant which has a lower Global Warming Potential (GWP), is better for the environment and delivers greater energy efficiency. However this gas is mildly flammable (A2L safety class) and does require some redesign change. These changes will be seen in our new range of R32 residential and light commercial heat pump air conditioning systems. The benefits of HFC R-32 are:- - Zero Ozone Depletion - 1/3 GWP of HFC 410A (GWP675 v GWP2088) - Superior energy efficiency - High refrigeration capacity and thermal conductivity - Low
    [Show full text]
  • Freon™ 407C and 407A Properties, Uses, Storage, and Handling
    Freon™ 407C and 407A Refrigerants (R-407C and R-407A) Properties, Uses, Storage, and Handling Freon™ Refrigerants Table of Contents Introduction ...........................................................................4 Air Monitors and Leak Detection ...................................... 16 Freon™ 407C and Freon™ 407A Refrigerant Types of Detectors .................................................................................16 Descriptions ................................................................................................... 4 Nonselective Detectors .................................................................16 Uses ......................................................................................4 Halogen-Selective Detectors ....................................................16 Physical Properties ...............................................................4 Compound-Specific Detectors .................................................16 Fluorescent Additives .....................................................................16 Chemical/Thermal Stability .............................................. 10 Stability with Metals .............................................................................10 Storage and Handling ........................................................ 17 Thermal Decomposition......................................................................11 Shipping Containers in the United States ..............................17 Compatibility Concerns If HCFC-22 and Freon™ Bulk Storage
    [Show full text]
  • Freon™ 410A (R-410A) Refrigerant
    SAFETY DATA SHEET Freon™ 410A (R-410A) Refrigerant Version Revision Date: SDS Number: Date of last issue: 04/20/2021 10.7 08/23/2021 1336443-00047 Date of first issue: 02/27/2017 SECTION 1. IDENTIFICATION Product name : Freon™ 410A (R-410A) Refrigerant SDS-Identcode : 130000050990 Manufacturer or supplier's details Company name of supplier : The Chemours Company FC, LLC Address : 1007 Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 United States of America (USA) Telephone : 1-844-773-CHEM (outside the U.S. 1-302-773-1000) Emergency telephone : Medical emergency: 1-866-595-1473 (outside the U.S. 1-302- 773-2000) ; Transport emergency: +1-800-424-9300 (outside the U.S. +1-703-527-3887) Recommended use of the chemical and restrictions on use Recommended use : Refrigerant Restrictions on use : For professional users only. SECTION 2. HAZARDS IDENTIFICATION GHS classification in accordance with the OSHA Hazard Communication Standard (29 CFR 1910.1200) Gases under pressure : Liquefied gas Simple Asphyxiant GHS label elements Hazard pictograms : Signal Word : Warning Hazard Statements : H280 Contains gas under pressure; may explode if heated. May displace oxygen and cause rapid suffocation. Precautionary Statements : Storage: P410 + P403 Protect from sunlight. Store in a well-ventilated place. 1 / 16 SAFETY DATA SHEET Freon™ 410A (R-410A) Refrigerant Version Revision Date: SDS Number: Date of last issue: 04/20/2021 10.7 08/23/2021 1336443-00047 Date of first issue: 02/27/2017 Other hazards Vapors are heavier than air and can cause suffocation by reducing oxygen available for breathing. Misuse or intentional inhalation abuse may cause death without warning symptoms, due to cardi- ac effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Next Generation Refrigerants: Standards and Climate Policy Implications of Engineering Constraints
    Next Generation Refrigerants: Standards and Climate Policy Implications of Engineering Constraints Hung Pham, Emerson Climate Technologies Harvey Sachs, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy ABSTRACT There is no single perfect refrigerant for diverse air conditioning, refrigeration, and industrial applications. The predominant halocarbons (CFCs, HCFCs, and HFCs) combine excellent efficiency and safety with acceptable costs. However, they contribute to ozone depletion potential (ODP) and/or global warming potential (GWP). The Montreal Protocol has eliminated ODP by requiring replacement of CFCs and HCFCs with HFCs such as R-410A, R- 407C, and R134a. The next focus is a worldwide technical and policy search for next-generation refrigerants with low global warming potential (LGWP). Potential options include “natural” refrigerants such as carbon dioxide (CO2), hydrocarbons (HC), and ammonia (NH3) as well as HFOs and HFO/HFC blends. All involve significant trade-offs among GWP, energy efficiency, safety, and cost. Environmental policy must consider the indirect effects of increased CO2 emissions for less efficient refrigerants, not just the direct global warming (GWP) of the refrigerant. We must insist on using metrics such as Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI) that balance refrigerant direct GWP, charge level, leakage emissions, and efficiency of the refrigerant in actual systems. This allows the best possible comparison of refrigerants for each application. In the right policy environment, we can achieve reduced environmental impact and increase efficiency. This will probably require increased differentiation of application-specific refrigerant choices that are associated with somewhat higher first costs but very attractive life cycle costs with acceptable safety and environmental impacts. Background One of the major transformations of the 20th Century is the widespread use of modern, effective, and safe space air conditioning, particularly for the hot climate in the South and Southwest of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Refrigerants
    INSTITUT INTERNATIONAL INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE DU FROID OF REFRIGERATION Organisation intergouvernement ale Intergovernmental organization pour le développement du froid for the development of refrigeration 177, boulevard Malesherbes, 75017 PARIS, France - Tél. 33-(0)1 42 27 32 35 - Fax 33-(0)1 47 63 17 98 - E-mail : [email protected] - Web : www.iifiir.org Classification of refrigerants This text is based on the American standard ANSI/ASHRAE 34 published in 2001 and entitled “Designation and Safety Classification of Refrigerants”. This classification makes it possible to designate all refrigerants used in a clear and internationally recognized manner by classifying them according to their chemical composition. 1 Numbering of Refrigerants An identifying number shall be assigned to each refrigerant. It consists of a prefix made up of letters and a suffix made up of digits. 1.1 Prefixes The prefix is composed of the letter R (for refrigerant). Examples: R22, R134a, R600a, R717 Sometimes, the letter C is used in the prefix to denote carbon, preceded by B, C or F (or a combination of these letters in the same order) to indicate the presence of bromine, chlorine or fluorine. Compounds containing hydrogen must be preceded by the letter H. Examples: HCFC22, HFC134a These prefixes must only be used in non-technical publications. Note: the name of the brand or of the manufacturer is also used sometimes; these names must not be used in official documents (identification labels, etc.). 1.2 Suffixes • Hydrocarbons and derivatives The first digit on the right (units) is the number of fluorine (F) atoms. The second digit on the right (tens) is one more than the number of hydrogen (H) atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Global Warming Potentials
    Appendix A: Global Warming Potentials When reporting emissions of non-CO2 gases, the mass estimates of these gases must also be reflected in the public report on a CO2e basis. Converting emissions of non-CO2 gases to units of CO2e allows GHGs to be compared on a common basis, i.e., the ability of each GHG to trap heat in the atmosphere. GWP factors represent the ratio of the heat-trapping ability of each GHG relative to that of CO2. TCR relies on GWP defaults published by the IPCC. As part of its activities, the IPCC revisits and updates these defaults in periodic Assessment Reports. When reporting emissions to TCR, members may use GRPs from the Assessment Report that is most relevant to their operations providing the following conditions are met: 1. All GRPs must be 100 year values; 2. Where possible within an inventory, all GWPs must come from a single Assessment Report. If GWPs for a particular gas are not provided in the chosen Assessment Report, members must select the more recent GRP for that has; and, 3. The source of all GRP values must be disclosed publicly. Although not required, it is considered best practice to use GWP values from the most recent Assessment Report. However, when a base year has been set, it is best practice to use the same GWP values for the current inventory and the base year inventory. Organizations that select a GWP different that is not from the most recent Assessment Report must justify their selection if they seek to conform with ISO 14064-1: 2018.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Refrigerants
    Refrigerant Table: Explanation and Glossary of Terms A reference list of refrigerants which is intended to provide an indication of the basic characteristics, properties and applications for a variety of refrigerants along with some replacement options was prepared upon the recommendation of HRAI’s Task Team on the Future of Refrigerants. This list is intended to assist contractors as a convenient reference when selecting suitable replacement/substitute refrigerants for those refrigerants (CFC and any HCFC) which are being phased out. While refrigerant manufacturers may indicate some products are suitable for retrofit applications, the contractor will need to consider the application in order to determine the extent of system modifications that may be required to accommodate the replacement refrigerant. Currently, one must verify with the Original Equipment Manufacturer (OEM) to determine compatibility of alternative refrigerants with the equipment, or have a Professional Engineer sign off. Unless otherwise specified, few if any replacement refrigerants in the table are certified as a direct drop‐in replacement, in fact most are certified for new equipment only and are not suitable for retrofit applications. Contractors would still have to determine which products are suitable for their particular application, if equipment replacement or retrofit options exist, which system modifications may be required and choose accordingly. Depending on the age of the existing equipment and the extent of system modifications required to accommodate an alternate refrigerant, it may prove to be more cost effective in the long run to replace equipment outright. As the phase down of certain refrigerants causes them to become scarcer, decreasing availability and increasing cost can be expected to result in the change‐out of entire systems to more energy efficient equipment and environmentally friendly refrigerants.
    [Show full text]