DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi Tennessee Pennsylvania West Virginia Connecticut FREE

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi Tennessee Pennsylvania West Virginia Connecticut FREE North North Maine Missouri Carolina Mississippi Delaware Oklahoma Nevada Rhode Island Carolina Massachusetts South Ohio Connecticut Indiana South Dakota Tennessee Pennsylvania Maryland Wyoming Nebraska Carolina FREE FREE Wisconsin Kentucky Montana Pennsylvania North Dakota Ohio Arizona Louisiana SPACE SPACE Oregon Hawaii North New York Arizona Virginia Connecticut Texas South Vermont Dakota Carolina West Nevada Rhode Island New Mexico Tennessee Indiana Alaska Idaho New Mexico West Virginia Virginia AMAX INC. © Hawaii Alabama Nebraska Kentucky Arkansas Delaware South Oklahoma Oregon Virginia Carolina New Jersey Vermont West Virginia Pennsylvania Alaska Kentucky Mississippi Alaska Tennessee Ohio FREE FREE Tennessee New York Colorado Illinois California Nevada Kansas Texas SPACE SPACE Minnesota Iowa Delaware Utah Maine Wyoming South Dakota Arkansas Montana Hawaii North North Rhode Island Utah Carolina Oregon Connecticut Washington Illinois Alabama Dakota New Jersey AMAX INC. © Massachusetts Maine Illinois Delaware Colorado Michigan Wyoming Wisconsin Oregon Delaware Tennessee Pennsylvania South Connecticut Virginia Georgia Utah Alaska Tennessee Louisiana Carolina FREE FREE New Jersey Kentucky Hawaii Missouri Arkansas Rhode Island California Texas SPACE SPACE West Oklahoma Maryland Washington Mississippi Nevada Kansas Idaho Missouri Montana Virginia New North Wisconsin New Mexico Ohio Hampshire Kansas Dakota Iowa Nebraska South Dakota Nevada AMAX INC. © North Alaska Utah California Mississippi Rhode Island Utah Arkansas Wyoming North Carolina Carolina Maine Oklahoma Nebraska West Virginia Arizona Alabama New York Nevada Iowa Indiana FREE FREE Tennessee North Idaho California Georgia Louisiana Ohio Dakota Texas SPACE SPACE Rhode Island Connecticut Vermont Connecticut South Massachusetts Montana Maryland Wisconsin Carolina Nebraska South Kentucky Nevada Carolina Michigan Missouri Delaware Kansas Virginia Colorado Washington AMAX INC. © Montana Washington Rhode Island Arizona Kansas Maryland New Delaware West Nevada Hampshire Virginia Oregon Pennsylvania Maryland New Jersey Wyoming Arizona New Mexico California South Mississippi Carolina FREE FREE North Utah Minnesota Massachusetts Pennsylvania Nebraska Missouri Carolina Iowa SPACE SPACE Delaware Nevada Michigan New Mexico Ohio South Dakota Oklahoma Hawaii Minnesota Iowa Georgia Wisconsin North Dakota Louisiana Utah Vermont Idaho Maine Rhode Island Connecticut AMAX INC. © Pennsylvania Nevada Kansas Connecticut Colorado Michigan New Mexico Rhode Island Utah Massachusetts Kentucky Oregon Wyoming Georgia Virginia South Dakota Iowa Alaska Delaware Tennessee FREE FREE Maryland South Delaware Carolina Missouri New Jersey Arizona Arkansas Mississippi SPACE SPACE Illinois Hawaii Washington Tennessee Nevada Montana Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Wisconsin West New North Louisiana Virginia Ohio Hampshire Texas Dakota California Indiana Idaho Kansas AMAX INC. © Vermont Hawaii Kentucky Oregon Tennessee Mississippi South North Washington Oklahoma Carolina Carolina Pennsylvania Illinois Alabama New Jersey West Virginia Arkansas New York Montana Tennessee Illinois FREE FREE North Connecticut New York Dakota Maine Nebraska Nevada Connecticut Texas SPACE SPACE New North Delaware Texas Colorado Utah Hampshire Ohio Dakota Massachusetts Minnesota Kansas Arizona Louisiana California Montana Rhode Island New Jersey Wyoming Alabama Delaware Wisconsin AMAX INC. © AMAX INC. © New Massachusetts Vermont Hampshire Maine Virginia Washington Oregon Montana North Dakota Minnesota Michigan Pennsylvania Ohio Rhode Island New York Idaho California Nevada Wyoming South Dakota FREE FREE Tennessee North Delaware Connecticut Utah Colorado Kansas Nebraska Carolina SPACE SPACE Mississippi Kentucky Indiana Georgia New Jersey Arkansas Missouri Arizona New Mexico Oklahoma Alabama Illinois Maryland West South Wisconsin Louisiana Iowa Delaware Texas Virginia Carolina AMAX INC. © North Mississippi Indiana Carolina California Louisiana Rhode Island Nevada New York Iowa Massachusetts Montana Texas Missouri Oklahoma Connecticut Mississippi Alabama Utah New Jersey North Carolina FREE FREE Illinois Alabama Delaware Kansas Louisiana Oregon Idaho Georgia SPACE SPACE New Jersey Arkansas New North Massachusetts Maine Wisconsin Maryland West Virginia New Mexico Hampshire Dakota New York South Colorado Virginia Washington Missouri Pennsylvania South Michigan California Carolina Carolina AMAX INC. © Wyoming Washington Rhode Island Arizona Montana Vermont New Delaware West Nevada Hampshire Virginia Oregon Nevada Maryland New Jersey Kansas Arizona South Dakota California Minnesota Mississippi FREE FREE Massachusetts Pennsylvania North Utah Minnesota Nebraska Missouri Carolina Iowa SPACE SPACE New Mexico Oklahoma Hawaii South Iowa Delaware Pennsylvania Michigan New Mexico Ohio Carolina Vermont Idaho Maine California Connecticut Georgia Wisconsin North Dakota Louisiana Utah AMAX INC. © North Mississippi Indiana Carolina California Alaska Rhode Island Nevada New York Iowa Indiana Montana Texas Nebraska Oklahoma Connecticut Mississippi Alabama Utah Wyoming North Carolina FREE FREE Louisiana Oregon Idaho Georgia Illinois Ohio Delaware Kansas SPACE SPACE Vermont Arkansas New North Massachusetts Maine Wisconsin Arizona West Virginia New Mexico Hampshire Dakota Missouri South Dakota South Michigan Kentucky Hawaii South Colorado Virginia Washington Carolina Carolina AMAX INC. © Oregon Pennsylvania Tennessee Alaska Colorado North Dakota New Arkansas New Jersey Virginia Hampshire New York Delaware Illinois Missouri Maine Kentucky North Nevada Tennessee Indiana Carolina FREE FREE South North Rhode Island Massachusetts Iowa Carolina Washington Ohio Dakota Texas SPACE SPACE Georgia Michigan Maryland Virginia Connecticut Vermont Connecticut Massachusetts Nebraska Kansas Washington Nevada Montana Wisconsin Missouri Wyoming Mississippi Alabama Utah South Carolina AMAX INC. © AMAX INC. © Alabama Alaska Arizona Arkansas California Colorado Connecticut Delaware Florida Georgia Hawaii Idaho Illinois Indiana Iowa Kansas Kentucky Louisiana Maine Maryland Massachusetts Michigan Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Montana Nebraska Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey New Mexico New York North Carolina North Dakota Ohio Oklahoma Oregon Pennslyvania Rhode Island South Carolina South Dakota Tennessee Texas Utah Vermont Virginia Washington West Virginia Wisconsin Wyoming AMAX INC. ©.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium 2018-21 Strategic Plan Table of Contents Strategic Planning Process
    Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium 2018-21 Strategic Plan Table of Contents Strategic Planning Process .............................................................................................................. 1 External and Internal Input ......................................................................................................... 1 Vision ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Mission ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Core Values ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Organizational Excellence ............................................................................................................... 3 Partnerships .................................................................................................................................... 4 Shared Positions While Leveraging Partnerships ........................................................................ 4 Gulf Sea Grant Programs ............................................................................................................. 4 State and Local Agencies ............................................................................................................. 5 Federal Agencies ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Population Fact Sheet
    Mississippi Fact Sheet Population Growth, Millennials, Brain Drain, and the Economy A Report to the Governor Dr. Mimmo Parisi Professor of Demography Department of Sociology Mississippi State University January 19, 2018 2017 Population Growth by the Numbers Population growth depends on multiple factors that includes Population Growth = (Births-Deaths) + (Net Domestic Migration + Net numbers of births and deaths, net International Migration) domestic migration, and net international migration. How each factor contributes to population Population Growth = (37,373 – 30,875) + (-9,885 + 2,087) growth must be seen in relation to the others. All factors must be Population Growth = 6,498 – 7,798 examined together to provide an accurate picture of any population Population Growth = -1,300 estimate. Also, all factors must be seen in the context of national trends to fully understand the magnitude of their impact on a given state. The estimates presented in the following slides provide detailed information on each factor that contributes to population growth, along with information on millennials, brain drain, and overall state economic indicators. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2010-2017/national/totals/ 3 Mississippi Population, 2000-2017 The estimates for 2016 and 2017 indicate that the population declined by 1,300. This decline is within the estimation margin of error and it will be revised next year, therefore this number needs to be interpreted cautiously. It also means that there has been no substantive decline in total population. The only conclusion one can draw from these estimates is that the Mississippi total 3,000,000 2,988,578 population has remained fairly stable.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Kite (Ictinia Mississippiensis)
    Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis) NMPIF level: Species Conservation Concern, Level 2 (SC2) NMPIF assessment score: 15 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: No special status New Mexico BCRs: 16, 18, 35 Primary breeding habitat(s): Urban (southeast plains) Other habitats used: Agricultural, Middle Elevation Riparian Summary of Concern Mississippi Kite is a migratory raptor that has successfully colonized urban habitats (parks, golf courses, residential neighborhoods) in the western portion of its breeding range over the last several decades. Little is known about species ecology outside of the breeding season and, despite stable or increasing populations at the periphery of its range, it remains vulnerable due to its small population size. Associated Species Cooper’s Hawk, Ring-necked Pheasant, Mourning Dove, American Robin Distribution Mississippi Kite is erratically distributed across portions of the east and southeast, the southern Great Plains, and the southwest, west to central Arizona and south to northwest Chihuahua. It is most abundant in areas of the Gulf Coast, and in the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles. The species is a long- distance migrant, wintering in Argentina, Paraguay, and perhaps other locations in South America. In New Mexico, Mississippi Kite is most common in cites and towns of the southeast plains. It is also present in the Middle Rio Grande valley north to Corrales, and the Pecos River Valley north to Fort Sumner and possibly Puerto de Luna (Parker 1999, Parmeter et al. 2002). Ecology and Habitat Requirements Mississippi Kite occupies different habitats in different parts of its range, including mature hardwood forests in the southeast, rural woodlands in mixed and shortgrass prairie in the Great Plains, and mixed riparian woodlands in the southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • MONTANA BIRTH CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Cascade County Clerk & Recorder, 121 4Th St N Ste 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 406-454-6718 IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED Picture I.D
    INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORDERING A BIRTH RECORD 1. Print, Fill out completely, and Sign application. (see below for who can order) 2. Provide proof of Identity (see acceptable methods below) 3. Enclose cashier’s check or money order (see Fees below) 4. Enclose a stamped self-addressed return envelope. (enclose a pre-paid envelope from express mail/UPS/FEDEX etc. for expedited service. We do not track mail once it leaves our office - keep all tracking info) 5. Mail application, I.D., payment, and return envelope to Cascade County Clerk and Recorder, 121 4th St N, Suite 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 WHO CAN ORDER A CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Only those authorized by 50-15-121 MCA, which includes the registrant (14 years old or older) the registrant’s spouse, children, parents or guardian or an authorized representative, may obtain a certified copy of a birth record. Proof of relationship, guardianship or authorization is required. Step-relatives, in-laws, grandparents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, ex-spouses, and a natural parent of an adoptive child or others are NOT eligible to receive a certified copy of a birth certificate. Non-certified informational/genealogy copies are available to anyone if record is more than 30 years old. Montana birth certificates are full size paper with a raised seal. Wallet size cards are not available. IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED •The person signing the request must provide an enlarged legible photocopy of both sides of their valid driver’s license or other legal picture identification with a signature, or the requestor must have the application notarized.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Azar V. Azar, 146 N.W.2D 148 (N.D
    N.D. Supreme Court Azar v. Azar, 146 N.W.2d 148 (N.D. 1966) Filed Nov. 4, 1966 [Go to Documents] IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA James J. Azar, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Betty Azar, Defendant and Appellant. Case No. 8257 [146 N.W.2d 149] Syllabus of the Court 1. Extreme cruelty as a ground for divorce is an infliction of grievous bodily injury or grievous mental suffering. Section 14-05-05, N.D.C.C. 2. Whether one party to a divorce action has inflicted grievous mental suffering upon the other is a question of fact to be determined from all the circumstances in the case. 3. Upon a trial de novo on appeal, the findings of fact of the trial judge are entitled to appreciable weight. 4. When a divorce is granted, the trial court has continuing jurisdiction with regard to the custody, care, education, and welfare of the minor children of the marriage. Section 14-05-22, N.D.C.C. 5. In the matter of awarding custody of the children of the parties to an action for divorce, the trial court is vested with a large discretion, and its discretion will ordinarily not be interfered with except for an abuse thereof. 6. In a divorce proceeding the court shall make such equitable distribution of the real and personal property of the parties as may seem just and proper. Section 14-05-24, N.D.C.C. Appeal from a judgment of the District Court of Burleigh County, Honorable C. F. Kelsch, Special Judge.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas
    Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas J.M. McKimmey, B. Dixon, H.D. Scott, and C.M. Scarlat ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas November 2002 Research Report 970 Additional printed copies of this publication can be obtained free of charge from Communication Services, 110 Agriculture Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. This publication is available on the Internet at: http://www.uark.edu/depts/agripub/Publications/ Additional information on soils in Arkansas is available at soils.uark.edu Technical editing and cover design by Cam Romund Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville. Milo J. Shult, Vice President for Agriculture and Director; Gregory J. Weidemann, Dean, Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences and Associate Vice President for Agriculture–Research, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. CPB777QX5. The University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture follows a nondiscriminatory policy in programs and employment. ISSN:1539-5944 CODEN:AKABA7 Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas J.M. McKimmey, Research Specialist B. Dixon, Research Specialist H.D. Scott, University Professor C.M. Scarlat, Research Specialist All authors are associated with the Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences University of Arkansas Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wills of Cascade County Great Falls, Montana Volumes One & Three
    WILLS OF CASCADE COUNTY GREAT FALLS, MONTANA VOLUMES ONE & THREE No record has been found of the Volume two of the Wills of Cascade County, Montana. Retyped by Thelma L. Marshall indexed by Eddie Josey-Wilson and Evan Heisel Great Falls Genealogy Society Great Falls, Montana April 1996 ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA 1884-1909 VOLUME 1 BLACK EAGLE CHAPTER DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GREAT FALLS, MONTANA ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY; MONTANA VOLUME 1 ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA BLACK EAGLE CHAPTER DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GREAT FALLS, MONTANA COPIED BY: Mrs. Lou Siniff Mrs. Theodore Cox Miss Ella Nelson Miss Grace Collins Grace Dutton Collins, State Chairman 1 951 - 1952 RICHARD WRIGHT of Fairfield St., Philadelphia, U.S.A. DATED: 3 Sep. 1888 WIFE: Elizabeth WRIGHT FATHER: James Wright SISTERS: Charlotte Wright, Rebecca Wright (wife of James Wright)Maria Moore (wife of J.W. MOORE). BROTHERS: William, Arthur, late brother Edmund EXECUTORS: Brother Arthur Wright, Wife Elizabeth Wright and sister Charlotte Wright. WITNESSES: S. Harlan Price and Wm.H. Walker. "Should I die in England I wish to be buried in the lot beside my father and mother, in the cemetery at Oday, Yorkshire in England. If I die away from England I wish a stone to be erected on this lot giving my birth and death dates." JAMES STONE of Great Falls, Cascade County, Montana. DATED: 27 March 1891 HEIR: In view of the fact that Thomas E. Brady has loaned me large sums of money and cared for me during this my last illness I bequeath to him all my properties, chattels and debts.
    [Show full text]
  • Voters in Five States Approve Marijuana Ballot Initiatives on Election Day by Martin W
    Publications Voters in Five States Approve Marijuana Ballot Initiatives on Election Day By Martin W. Aron, Kathryn J. Russo and Catherine A. Cano November 4, 2020 Meet the Authors Voters in Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota approved laws to legalize marijuana on Election Day 2020. Recreational marijuana was approved in Arizona, Montana, and New Jersey, while Mississippi voters approved medical marijuana. South Dakota voters approved both medical and recreational marijuana ballot initiatives. Martin W. Aron Medical Marijuana 1. Mississippi – Mississippi Ballot Measure 1 passed, with 68% voting “yes and 32% voting “no. Principal and Office Litigation Ballot Measure 1 asked voters to generally cast a vote for “either measure Initiative 65 or Alternative Manager 65A, or against both measures. Voters who cast a vote for “either measure were then required to cast Berkeley Heights 908-795-5127 Email an additional vote for their preferred measure. Mississippi voters passed Initiative 65 with 74% voting for it and 23% voting for Alternative 65A. (Percentages are those reported by The New York Times on Nov. 4, 2020, as of 12:15 p.m. EST.) Initiative 65 allows the medical use of marijuana by patients who suffer from qualifying medical conditions. Qualified medical marijuana patients may possess up to 2.5 ounces of medical marijuana. The new law does not permit a qualifying patient to be “subject to criminal or civil sanctions for the use of medical marijuana. However, it does not require “accommodation for the use of medical marijuana or require any on-site use of medical marijuana in any place of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Summary of State Child Access Prevention Laws
    SUMMARY OF STATE CHILD ACCESS PREVENTION LAWS States with Child Access Prevention Laws California Colorado Connecticut Delaware District of Columbia Florida Georgia Hawaii Illinois Indiana Iowa Kentucky Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota Mississippi Missouri Nevada New Hampshire New Jersey North Carolina Oklahoma Rhode Island Tennessee Texas Utah Virginia Wisconsin State Laws Based on Negligent Storage California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota New Hampshire New Jersey North Carolina Rhode Island Texas States Imposing Criminal Liability for Allowing a Child to Gain Access to the Firearm, Regardless of Whether the Child Uses the Firearm or Causes Injury Hawaii Maryland Massachusetts Minnesota New Jersey Texas States Imposing Criminal Liability Only if a Child Uses or Possesses the Firearm California Connecticut Florida Illinois Iowa New Hampshire North Carolina Rhode Island States Imposing Criminal Liability for Negligent Storage of Unloaded Firearms California Hawaii Massachusetts State Laws Prohibiting Intentional, Knowing or Reckless Provision of Firearms to Minors Colorado Delaware Georgia Indiana Kentucky Mississippi Missouri Nevada Oklahoma Tennessee Utah Virginia Wisconsin Description of State Child Access Prevention Laws The majority of states have laws designed to prevent children from accessing firearms. The strongest laws impose criminal liability when a minor gains access to a negligently stored firearm. The weakest prohibit persons from directly providing a firearm to a minor. There is a wide range of laws that fall somewhere between these extremes, including laws that impose criminal liability for negligently stored firearms, but only where the child uses the firearm and causes death or serious injury. Weaker laws impose liability only in the event of reckless, knowing or intentional conduct by the adult.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Mississippi River Fisheries Coordination Office
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Lower Mississippi River Fisheries Coordination Office Station Facts Activity Highlights ■ Established: 1994. ■ Development of an Aquatic Resource Management Plan to ■ Number of staff: one. restore natural resources in the 2.7 ■ Geographic area covered: million-acre, leveed floodplain of Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, the Lower Mississippi River. Mississippi, Missouri, and ■ Publication of the LMRCC Tennessee. Newsletter, a regional newsletter Station Goals on aquatic resource conservation photo: USFWS photo: ■ Provide a permanent forum for management issues, and natural facilitating the management of the resource-based economic aquatic natural resources of the development. Lower Mississippi River leveed ■ Provide long-term economic, floodplain. environmental, and public ■ Restore and enhance aquatic recreation benefits to the region by habitat in the Lower Mississippi cooperatively addressing aquatic River leveed floodplain and resource management issues. tributaries. Questions and Answers: photo: USFWS photo: ■ Increase public awareness and What does your office do? encourage sustainable use of the The Lower Mississippi River Lower Mississippi River’s natural Fisheries Coordination Office resources. (FCO) coordinates the work of many different state and Federal ■ Promote natural resource-based natural resource management and economic development. environmental quality agencies that deal with the Lower Mississippi River ■ Increase technical knowledge of the aquatic resource issues. Lower Mississippi River’s natural resources. Why is the Lower Mississippi River photo: USFWS photo: important? Services provided to: The Mississippi River is the fourth ■ Project leader serves as longest river in the world, flowing coordinator for the Lower for more than 2,350 miles from its Mississippi River Conservation headwaters in Lake Itasca, Minnesota Committee (LMRCC); LMRCC to the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Application for Absentee Ballot
    Application for Absentee Ballot Including Absentee List Request, Election Specific Absentee Ballot Request, Request for Absentee Ballot Due to Illness or Health Emergency or to be removed from receiving an Absentee Ballot. Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required fields. Please type or use black or blue pen only and print clearly. COMPLETE FORM AND SUBMIT TO COUNTY ELECTION OFFICE BY NOON THE DAY BEFORE ELECTION DAY APPLICANT IDENTIFYING AND CONTACT INFORMATION Last Name* First Name* Middle Name (Optional) Birthdate* (MM/DD/YYYY) Phone Number (Optional) Email Address (Optional) County where you reside and are registered to vote* Montana Residence Address* City* Zip Code* Mailing Address (required if differs from residence address*) City and State Zip Code Check if the mailing address listed above is for part of the year only and if so, complete the information below (for absentee ballot list only). Clearly print the complete mailing address(es) and specify the applicable time periods for address (add more addresses as necessary). Seasonal Mailing Address (Optional) City and State Zip Code Period (mm/dd/yyyy-mm/dd/yyyy) BALLOT REQUEST OPTIONS AND VOTER AFFIRMATION Yes, I request an absentee ballot to be mailed to me for ALL elections in which I am eligible to vote as long as I reside at the address listed on this application. I understand that if I file a change of address with the U.S. postal service, I must complete, sign, and return a confirmation notice mailed to me by the county election office; OR I hereby request an absentee ballot for the upcoming election (check only one): Primary General Municipal Other election to be held on By signing below, I understand that I am officially requesting an absentee ballot and affirm that I will have met the 30-day Montana residency requirement before voting my absentee ballot.
    [Show full text]