DOCSLIB.ORG

Mississippi Population Fact Sheet

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mississippi Population Fact Sheet Mississippi Fact Sheet Population Growth, Millennials, Brain Drain, and the Economy A Report to the Governor Dr. Mimmo Parisi Professor of Demography Department of Sociology Mississippi State University January 19, 2018 2017 Population Growth by the Numbers Population growth depends on multiple factors that includes Population Growth = (Births-Deaths) + (Net Domestic Migration + Net numbers of births and deaths, net International Migration) domestic migration, and net international migration. How each factor contributes to population Population Growth = (37,373 – 30,875) + (-9,885 + 2,087) growth must be seen in relation to the others. All factors must be Population Growth = 6,498 – 7,798 examined together to provide an accurate picture of any population Population Growth = -1,300 estimate. Also, all factors must be seen in the context of national trends to fully understand the magnitude of their impact on a given state. The estimates presented in the following slides provide detailed information on each factor that contributes to population growth, along with information on millennials, brain drain, and overall state economic indicators. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2010-2017/national/totals/ 3 Mississippi Population, 2000-2017 The estimates for 2016 and 2017 indicate that the population declined by 1,300. This decline is within the estimation margin of error and it will be revised next year, therefore this number needs to be interpreted cautiously. It also means that there has been no substantive decline in total population. The only conclusion one can draw from these estimates is that the Mississippi total 3,000,000 2,988,578 population has remained fairly stable. 2,982,963 2,985,415 2,970,437 2,987,721 2,985,297 2,984,115 2,977,452 2,947,806 2,950,000 2,958,774 2,928,350 2,904,978 2,900,000 2,889,010 2,905,943 2,858,681 This begs the question: why is the population not growing? The answer lies in two Population 2,848,353 2,868,312 important factors. First, the state experienced a dramatic decline in births as a 2,850,000 result of aggressive policies to reduce teenage pregnancy. These numbers are 2,852,994 reported in slides 5-7. The population is also not growing because Mississippi is not a new Hispanic destination. In fact, the state experienced the least positive net international migration. These numbers are reported in slides 9-12. If Mississippi had not experienced a reduction in numbers of births and had experienced the 2,800,000 same level of international in-migration as other states, Mississippi’s total population would have continued to grow. Another key factor is that only a few counties experience a significant negative net domestic migration (see slide 12). 2,750,000 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2010-2017/national/totals/ 4 Births by the Numbers Annual Number of Births, 2011-2017 40,000 39,746 39,500 39,430 39,000 38,715 38,578 38,500 38,505 38,000 37,951 37,373 37,500 Overall Decline: -2,373 37,000 36,500 36,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Year An important factor that needs to be accounted for in the population growth is the number of births. Mississippi experienced a declining annual number of births. As a result, Mississippi’s total population would have had a net positive growth if the number of births would have remained the same since 2011. Other indicators suggest that the decline in birth stems primarily from a strong policy to reduce teen pregnancy. These numbers are presented in the next two slides. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www.census.gov/data/tables/2017/demo/popest/state-total.html 6 Mississippi Teenage Pregnancy Rate 5.00 4.50 4.30 4.10 4.07 4.06 3.89 3.90 4.00 3.82 3.63 3.64 3.55 3.34 3.50 3.01 3.00 2.74 2.52 2.50 2.25 2.03 1.92 2.00 1.50 Teenage Pregnancy Rate Pregnancy Teenage 1.00 0.50 0.00 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Year Compared to the nation, Mississippi experienced one of the fastest reductions in teenage pregnancy. The teen pregnancy rate declined by 361 percent since 2000. Source: Mississippi State Department of Health, Vital Statistics Bureau, 2017. https://msdh.ms.gov/msdhsite/_static/31,0,75.html 7 Birth Events of Female Mississippi Public School Students in Grades 6-12 by Abstinence Education Curriculum Type 4.00 3.50 3.37 3.00 2.50 Statewide: 1.9 2.00 1.68 1.77 1.50 Percent That Experienced Birth Event 1.00 0.50 0.00 Abstinence-only Abstinence-plus No abstinence education Curriculum Type Mississippi has adopted an aggressive abstinence program by providing two types of curriculum. Official statistics from the Department of Health show that these programs had a significant impact on reducing teen pregnancy in the K12 system. Source: Mississippi LifeTracks, 2016. https://www.lifetracks.ms.gov/RequestAnalysis/ResearchStudies.aspx 8 Migration by the Numbers Net Domestic Migration, 2016-2017 Florida 160,854 Texas 79,163 North Carolina 66,051 Washington 64,579 Arizona 63,111 South Carolina 49,015 Georgia 41,107 Tennessee 40,232 Nevada 38,227 Oregon 37,975 Colorado 36,653 Idaho 24,597 Utah 17,568 Montana 8,666 Minnesota 7,941 Maine 5,376 Arkansas 4,718 Mississippi is not the only New Hampshire 4,687 Delaware 4,484 state to have a negative net Alabama 3,840 South Dakota 1,976 domestic migration. There are District of Columbia 1,152 Kentucky 1,024 27 states that have Vermont -918 experienced negative net Indiana -976 Missouri -1,050 domestic migration, and State Wis cons in -2,086 Iowa -2,724 Mississippi does not have one Nebraska -3,493 Rhode Island -3,854 of the largest declines. The North Dakota -6,653 New Mexico -7,437 takeaway from this graph is Ohio -8,205 Wyoming -8,613 that Mississippi is in line with Mississippi -9,885 Alaska -9,938 national trends. Oklahoma -10,470 West Virgini a -10,507 Virginia -12,395 Michigan -12,698 Hawaii -13,537 Kansas -14,150 Connecticut -22,270 Massachusetts -23,089 Maryland -23,984 Pennsylvania -25,793 Louisiana -27,515 New Jersey -57,274 Illinois -114,779 California -138,195 New York -190,508 -250,000 -200,000 -150,000 -100,000 -50,000 0 50,000 100,000 150,000 200,000 250,000 Domestic Migration Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2010-2017/national/totals/ 10 Net International Migration, 2016-2017 California 164,867 Florida 144,165 New York 130,411 Texas 110,417 New Jersey 56,942 Massachusetts 45,298 Pennsylvania 37,389 Illinois 33,699 Virginia 33,365 Maryland 29,031 Washington 25,984 Georgia 25,870 Michigan 23,179 Ohio 22,131 North Carolina 20,162 Connecticut 17,758 Minnesota 16,460 Arizona 16,205 Indiana 11,410 Tennessee 10,469 Negative domestic migration Colorado 9,973 is typically counterbalanced by Wis cons in 8,268 Missouri 8,076 international migration, which Nevada 7,957 Oregon 7,712 is mostly comprised of Asians Louisiana 7,696 State Oklahoma 7,322 and Hispanics. Unlike other Kentucky 7,014 Iowa 6,836 states, Mississippi is not a Hawaii 6,703 Kansas 6,198 new Hispanic destination. The South Carolina 5,447 Utah 5,019 state ranks as one of the Nebraska 4,853 Rhode Island 4,798 lowest in the country. Alabama 4,475 District of Columbia 4,160 Arkansas 3,499 New Mexico 2,771 Delaware 2,722 New Hampshire 2,236 Mississippi 2,087 Idaho 1,928 Maine 1,578 Alaska 1,557 North Dakota 1,489 South Dakota 1,273 Vermont 933 West Virgini a 867 Wyoming 328 Montana 296 0 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 International Migration Source: U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division, 2017. https://www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/popest/datasets/2010-2017/national/totals/ 11 Domestic Migration: Gain and Loss to Other States 2016-2017 Moving To Mississippi Moving out of Mississippi Mississippi Population Net Gain or Loss to Other States Mississippi also experienced a Like other states, Mississippi gains positive net migration from 11 and loses population to other states states. More people came to in the union. The migration flow is Mississippi from Illinois, Louisiana not unidirectional, where people Michigan, New York, and West simply leave, but rather bidirectional, Virginia than residents moving from where some move out and some Mississippi to each of these states. move in. These flows are reported in the top two maps, and clearly In contrast, 70 percent of the total suggest that many people see negative net migration resulted Mississippi as a place to live and from more people moving from work. Mississippi to Texas, Florida, Georgia, and Alabama, than residents from these states moving Source: Internal Revenue Service, SOI Tax Stats - Migration Data – 2015-2016. to Mississippi . https://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/1516ms.xls 12 Who Gains and Who Loses in Mississippi, 2016-2017 Moving from Other States Moving Out of MS Counties to MS Counties To Other States Mississippi County Population Net Gain or Loss to Other States Each county experienced residents moving in from other states, but also residents 87 percent of the total population loss in moving out to other states.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium 2018-21 Strategic Plan Table of Contents Strategic Planning Process
    Mississippi-Alabama Sea Grant Consortium 2018-21 Strategic Plan Table of Contents Strategic Planning Process .............................................................................................................. 1 External and Internal Input ......................................................................................................... 1 Vision ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Mission ............................................................................................................................................ 3 Core Values ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Organizational Excellence ............................................................................................................... 3 Partnerships .................................................................................................................................... 4 Shared Positions While Leveraging Partnerships ........................................................................ 4 Gulf Sea Grant Programs ............................................................................................................. 4 State and Local Agencies ............................................................................................................. 5 Federal Agencies ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Kite (Ictinia Mississippiensis)
    Mississippi Kite (Ictinia mississippiensis) NMPIF level: Species Conservation Concern, Level 2 (SC2) NMPIF assessment score: 15 NM stewardship responsibility: Low National PIF status: No special status New Mexico BCRs: 16, 18, 35 Primary breeding habitat(s): Urban (southeast plains) Other habitats used: Agricultural, Middle Elevation Riparian Summary of Concern Mississippi Kite is a migratory raptor that has successfully colonized urban habitats (parks, golf courses, residential neighborhoods) in the western portion of its breeding range over the last several decades. Little is known about species ecology outside of the breeding season and, despite stable or increasing populations at the periphery of its range, it remains vulnerable due to its small population size. Associated Species Cooper’s Hawk, Ring-necked Pheasant, Mourning Dove, American Robin Distribution Mississippi Kite is erratically distributed across portions of the east and southeast, the southern Great Plains, and the southwest, west to central Arizona and south to northwest Chihuahua. It is most abundant in areas of the Gulf Coast, and in the Texas and Oklahoma panhandles. The species is a long- distance migrant, wintering in Argentina, Paraguay, and perhaps other locations in South America. In New Mexico, Mississippi Kite is most common in cites and towns of the southeast plains. It is also present in the Middle Rio Grande valley north to Corrales, and the Pecos River Valley north to Fort Sumner and possibly Puerto de Luna (Parker 1999, Parmeter et al. 2002). Ecology and Habitat Requirements Mississippi Kite occupies different habitats in different parts of its range, including mature hardwood forests in the southeast, rural woodlands in mixed and shortgrass prairie in the Great Plains, and mixed riparian woodlands in the southwest.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas
    Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas J.M. McKimmey, B. Dixon, H.D. Scott, and C.M. Scarlat ARKANSAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION Division of Agriculture University of Arkansas November 2002 Research Report 970 Additional printed copies of this publication can be obtained free of charge from Communication Services, 110 Agriculture Building, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR 72701. This publication is available on the Internet at: http://www.uark.edu/depts/agripub/Publications/ Additional information on soils in Arkansas is available at soils.uark.edu Technical editing and cover design by Cam Romund Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture, Fayetteville. Milo J. Shult, Vice President for Agriculture and Director; Gregory J. Weidemann, Dean, Dale Bumpers College of Agricultural, Food and Life Sciences and Associate Vice President for Agriculture–Research, University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture. CPB777QX5. The University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture follows a nondiscriminatory policy in programs and employment. ISSN:1539-5944 CODEN:AKABA7 Soils of Mississippi County, Arkansas J.M. McKimmey, Research Specialist B. Dixon, Research Specialist H.D. Scott, University Professor C.M. Scarlat, Research Specialist All authors are associated with the Department of Crop, Soil, and Environmental Sciences University of Arkansas Arkansas Agricultural Experiment Station Fayetteville, Arkansas 72701 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Voters in Five States Approve Marijuana Ballot Initiatives on Election Day by Martin W
    Publications Voters in Five States Approve Marijuana Ballot Initiatives on Election Day By Martin W. Aron, Kathryn J. Russo and Catherine A. Cano November 4, 2020 Meet the Authors Voters in Arizona, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, and South Dakota approved laws to legalize marijuana on Election Day 2020. Recreational marijuana was approved in Arizona, Montana, and New Jersey, while Mississippi voters approved medical marijuana. South Dakota voters approved both medical and recreational marijuana ballot initiatives. Martin W. Aron Medical Marijuana 1. Mississippi – Mississippi Ballot Measure 1 passed, with 68% voting “yes and 32% voting “no. Principal and Office Litigation Ballot Measure 1 asked voters to generally cast a vote for “either measure Initiative 65 or Alternative Manager 65A, or against both measures. Voters who cast a vote for “either measure were then required to cast Berkeley Heights 908-795-5127 Email an additional vote for their preferred measure. Mississippi voters passed Initiative 65 with 74% voting for it and 23% voting for Alternative 65A. (Percentages are those reported by The New York Times on Nov. 4, 2020, as of 12:15 p.m. EST.) Initiative 65 allows the medical use of marijuana by patients who suffer from qualifying medical conditions. Qualified medical marijuana patients may possess up to 2.5 ounces of medical marijuana. The new law does not permit a qualifying patient to be “subject to criminal or civil sanctions for the use of medical marijuana. However, it does not require “accommodation for the use of medical marijuana or require any on-site use of medical marijuana in any place of employment.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Mississippi River Fisheries Coordination Office
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Lower Mississippi River Fisheries Coordination Office Station Facts Activity Highlights ■ Established: 1994. ■ Development of an Aquatic Resource Management Plan to ■ Number of staff: one. restore natural resources in the 2.7 ■ Geographic area covered: million-acre, leveed floodplain of Arkansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, the Lower Mississippi River. Mississippi, Missouri, and ■ Publication of the LMRCC Tennessee. Newsletter, a regional newsletter Station Goals on aquatic resource conservation photo: USFWS photo: ■ Provide a permanent forum for management issues, and natural facilitating the management of the resource-based economic aquatic natural resources of the development. Lower Mississippi River leveed ■ Provide long-term economic, floodplain. environmental, and public ■ Restore and enhance aquatic recreation benefits to the region by habitat in the Lower Mississippi cooperatively addressing aquatic River leveed floodplain and resource management issues. tributaries. Questions and Answers: photo: USFWS photo: ■ Increase public awareness and What does your office do? encourage sustainable use of the The Lower Mississippi River Lower Mississippi River’s natural Fisheries Coordination Office resources. (FCO) coordinates the work of many different state and Federal ■ Promote natural resource-based natural resource management and economic development. environmental quality agencies that deal with the Lower Mississippi River ■ Increase technical knowledge of the aquatic resource issues. Lower Mississippi River’s natural resources. Why is the Lower Mississippi River photo: USFWS photo: important? Services provided to: The Mississippi River is the fourth ■ Project leader serves as longest river in the world, flowing coordinator for the Lower for more than 2,350 miles from its Mississippi River Conservation headwaters in Lake Itasca, Minnesota Committee (LMRCC); LMRCC to the Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter
    List of Surrounding States *For those Chapters that are made up of more than one state we will submit education to the states and surround states of the Chapter. Hawaii accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Virginia will accept Continuing Education hours without prior approval. All Qualifying Education must be approved by them. Offering In Will submit to Alaska Alabama Florida Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Mississippi Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Nevada Utah California Arizona Nevada Oregon Colorado Arizona Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Wyoming Connecticut Massachusetts New Jersey New York Rhode Island District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida Alabama Georgia Georgia Alabama Florida North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Hawaii Iowa Illinois Missouri Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota Wisconsin Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Illinois Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Kentucky Michigan Ohio Wisconsin Kansas Colorado Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Kentucky Illinois Indiana Missouri Ohio Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Texas Massachusetts Connecticut Maine New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Maryland Delaware District of Columbia
    [Show full text]
  • MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2021 By
    MISSISSIPPI LEGISLATURE REGULAR SESSION 2021 By: Senator(s) Hill To: Public Health and Welfare; Accountability, Efficiency, Transparency SENATE BILL NO. 2171 1 AN ACT TO CREATE THE TRANSGENDER 21 ACT; TO PROHIBIT THE 2 STATE, ITS AGENTS, AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION FROM INFRINGING ON A 3 PARENT'S RIGHT TO WITHHOLD CONSENT FOR ANY TREATMENT, ACTIVITY OR 4 MENTAL HEALTHCARE SERVICES THAT ARE DESIGNED AND INTENDED TO FORM 5 THEIR CHILD'S CONCEPTIONS OF SEX AND GENDER OR TO TREAT GENDER 6 DYSPHORIA OR GENDER NONCONFORMITY; TO PROHIBIT CERTAIN MEDICAL 7 PROCEDURES FROM BEING PERFORMED UPON A MINOR; TO PROVIDE A PENALTY 8 FOR ANY MEDICAL PROFESSION WHO PERFORMS CERTAIN MEDICAL PROCEDURES 9 UPON A MINOR; TO PROVIDE A GOOD-FAITH EXCEPTION FOR A MINOR BORN 10 WITH A MEDICALLY VERIFIABLE GENETIC DISORDER OF SEXUAL 11 DEVELOPMENT; TO PROHIBIT ANY STATE AGENCY, POLITICAL SUBDIVISION 12 OR LICENSING ORGANIZATION FROM FORBIDDING, PENALIZING OR TAKING 13 ADVERSE ACTION AGAINST AN INDIVIDUAL WHO GIVES OR RECEIVES 14 COUNSEL, ADVICE, GUIDANCE OR OTHER SPEECH OR COMMUNICATION 15 CONSISTENT WITH CONSCIENCE OR RELIGIOUS BELIEF; TO PROVIDE THAT NO 16 INDIVIDUAL SHALL BE DISCRIMINATED AGAINST FOR PROVIDING 17 INFORMATION ABOUT A VIOLATION OF THIS ACT TO CERTAIN AUTHORITIES; 18 TO PROVIDE A PRIVATE CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATIONS OF THIS ACT; 19 TO PREEMPT POLITICAL SUBDIVISIONS FROM PROMULGATING RULES OR 20 REGULATIONS THAT LIMITS THE PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT AND JUDGMENT OF A 21 MENTAL HEALTHCARE PROFESSIONAL OR COUNSELOR; TO PROVIDE THAT THE 22 PROVISIONS OF THIS ACT ARE SEVERABLE; AND FOR RELATED PURPOSES. 23 BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI: 24 SECTION 1.
    [Show full text]
  • OECD Territorial Grids
    BETTER POLICIES FOR BETTER LIVES DES POLITIQUES MEILLEURES POUR UNE VIE MEILLEURE OECD Territorial grids August 2021 OECD Centre for Entrepreneurship, SMEs, Regions and Cities Contact: [email protected] 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 3 Territorial level classification ...................................................................................................................... 3 Map sources ................................................................................................................................................. 3 Map symbols ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Disclaimers .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Australia / Australie ..................................................................................................................................... 6 Austria / Autriche ......................................................................................................................................... 7 Belgium / Belgique ...................................................................................................................................... 9 Canada ......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Slaves and Slaveholders in the Choctaw Nation: 1830-1866
    SLAVES AND SLAVEHOLDERS IN THE CHOCTAW NATION: 1830-1866 Jeffrey L. Fortney , Jr., B.A. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS May 2009 APPROVED: D. Harland Haglen, Major Professor Randolph Campbell, Committee Member F. Todd Smith, Committee Member Richard McCaslin, Chair of the Department of History Michael Monticino, Interim Dean of the Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies Fortney Jr., Jeffrey L. Slaves and Slaveholders in the Choctaw Nation: 1830-1866. Master of Arts (History), May 2009, 71 pp., 5 tables, 4 figures, bibliography, 46 titles. Racial slavery was a critical element in the cultural development of the Choctaws and was a derivative of the peculiar institution in southern states. The idea of genial and hospitable slave owners can no more be conclusively demonstrated for the Choctaws than for the antebellum South. The participation of Choctaws in the Civil War and formal alliance with the Confederacy was dominantly influenced by the slaveholding and a connection with southern identity, but was also influenced by financial concerns and an inability to remain neutral than a protection of the peculiar institution. Had the Civil War not taken place, the rate of Choctaw slave ownership possibly would have reached the level of southern states and the Choctaws would be considered part of the South. Copyright 2009 by Jeffrey L. Fortney, Jr. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page LIST OF TABLES ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Arkansas: Louna: Mississippi; New Mexico; Oklahoma: Texas
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 135 645 El 012 573 AUTHOR Smith, Martha L.: Smith, Milton L. TITLE Identifying Power Structures. PUB DATE Apr BO NOTE 14p.: Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Am rican Educational Research AssOciation (Boston, MA, April 7-11, 19801. EDRS PRICE MF01 Plus Postage. PC Not Available from EDES. DESCRIPTORS *Decision Making, Employed Women; Occupational Surveys: *Policy Formation: *Power Structure: *Professicnal Occupations; Tables (Data) IDENTIFIERS Arkansas: Louna: Mississippi; New Mexico; Oklahoma: Texas ABSTRACT This paper reports on two processes used to begin a long-term series of studies on educational power structures in the states of Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, New Mexico, Oklahoma, and Texas. Purposes of the study were to determine if (1) substrata or pools of power undergird educational power structures,(2) certain paths to power are typically. followed by influentials, (3) separate power structures exist for grades K-12 and postseccndary education, and (4)power structure changes can be predicted. The research method used involved asking the executive director of each state education association to make a list of the five to ten most influential decision-makers in the state and then asking each of thcse persons to do the same. After two rounds of interviews with 112 persons, consensus was reached on 50 top leaders. The other uethcd used was also a modified reputaticnal process. The paper draws no conclusions, since additional work in progress is testing the efficacy of the processes. Observations are made, however, about the number of nonedumators who are influential in educational decision-making, and the ndAber of individuals orginally tagged as seccnd and third raters who move into the rower structure.(Author) Reproductions supplied hy Pnps Rro the best that can be made fre71m the nricii.nal document.
    [Show full text]
  • Mississippi Surpasses Oklahoma As Second-Highest Imprisoning State
    Mississippi Surpasses Oklahoma as Second-Highest Imprisoning State Mississippi has been steadily climbing back up the top imprisoning states list and has now moved from third to second highest imprisoning state in the nation. The state’s failure in recent years to pass any meaningful sentencing and parole reforms to target extreme sentences bucks the trend in other top imprisoning states where impactful criminal justice reforms are successfully and safely driving prison populations down. Background Mississippi is experiencing an incarceration crisis, driven by its reliance on long sentences. The recent deaths in prisons across Mississippi have laid bare the urgent need for reforms aimed at immediately decreasing the state’s dangerously high prison population. Both Louisiana and Oklahoma, formerly ranked above Mississippi as the two top imprisoning states, have advanced multi-year criminal justice reforms aimed at reducing sentences and prison terms that have shown marked success in bringing prison populations down. As states across the country take strides to safely reduce the number of people under correctional control, Mississippi’s adherence to failed policies like extreme sentences is directly responsible for a prison population so large that the state is unable to safely house and supervise the nearly 20,000 people in its care and custody. As a result, Mississippi’s imprisonment rate (652 people in prison per 100,000 population1) has surpassed Oklahoma’s (625 per 100,000 population2), pushing Mississippi into the #2 spot in the country. Texas, Oklahoma, and Louisiana are among the large and growing cohort of high imprisonment states to see significant prison population declines and all three attribute success to implementing sentencing, parole, and commutation reforms.
    [Show full text]