Application for Absentee Ballot
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
A Generalization of the Minisum and Minimax Voting Methods
A Generalization of the Minisum and Minimax Voting Methods Shankar N. Sivarajan Undergraduate, Department of Physics Indian Institute of Science Bangalore 560 012, India [email protected] Faculty Advisor: Prof. Y. Narahari Deparment of Computer Science and Automation Revised Version: December 4, 2017 Abstract In this paper, we propose a family of approval voting-schemes for electing committees based on the preferences of voters. In our schemes, we calcu- late the vector of distances of the possible committees from each of the ballots and, for a given p-norm, choose the one that minimizes the magni- tude of the distance vector under that norm. The minisum and minimax methods suggested by previous authors and analyzed extensively in the literature naturally appear as special cases corresponding to p = 1 and p = 1; respectively. Supported by examples, we suggest that using a small value of p; such as 2 or 3, provides a good compromise between the minisum and minimax voting methods with regard to the weightage given to approvals and disapprovals. For large but finite p; our method reduces to finding the committee that covers the maximum number of voters, and this is far superior to the minimax method which is prone to ties. We also discuss extensions of our methods to ternary voting. 1 Introduction In this paper, we consider the problem of selecting a committee of k members out of n candidates based on preferences expressed by m voters. The most common way of conducting this election is to allow each voter to select his favorite candidate and vote for him/her, and we select the k candidates with the most number of votes. -
Are Condorcet and Minimax Voting Systems the Best?1
1 Are Condorcet and Minimax Voting Systems the Best?1 Richard B. Darlington Cornell University Abstract For decades, the minimax voting system was well known to experts on voting systems, but was not widely considered to be one of the best systems. But in recent years, two important experts, Nicolaus Tideman and Andrew Myers, have both recognized minimax as one of the best systems. I agree with that. This paper presents my own reasons for preferring minimax. The paper explicitly discusses about 20 systems. Comments invited. [email protected] Copyright Richard B. Darlington May be distributed free for non-commercial purposes Keywords Voting system Condorcet Minimax 1. Many thanks to Nicolaus Tideman, Andrew Myers, Sharon Weinberg, Eduardo Marchena, my wife Betsy Darlington, and my daughter Lois Darlington, all of whom contributed many valuable suggestions. 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction and summary 3 2. The variety of voting systems 4 3. Some electoral criteria violated by minimax’s competitors 6 Monotonicity 7 Strategic voting 7 Completeness 7 Simplicity 8 Ease of voting 8 Resistance to vote-splitting and spoiling 8 Straddling 8 Condorcet consistency (CC) 8 4. Dismissing eight criteria violated by minimax 9 4.1 The absolute loser, Condorcet loser, and preference inversion criteria 9 4.2 Three anti-manipulation criteria 10 4.3 SCC/IIA 11 4.4 Multiple districts 12 5. Simulation studies on voting systems 13 5.1. Why our computer simulations use spatial models of voter behavior 13 5.2 Four computer simulations 15 5.2.1 Features and purposes of the studies 15 5.2.2 Further description of the studies 16 5.2.3 Results and discussion 18 6. -
Single-Winner Voting Method Comparison Chart
Single-winner Voting Method Comparison Chart This chart compares the most widely discussed voting methods for electing a single winner (and thus does not deal with multi-seat or proportional representation methods). There are countless possible evaluation criteria. The Criteria at the top of the list are those we believe are most important to U.S. voters. Plurality Two- Instant Approval4 Range5 Condorcet Borda (FPTP)1 Round Runoff methods6 Count7 Runoff2 (IRV)3 resistance to low9 medium high11 medium12 medium high14 low15 spoilers8 10 13 later-no-harm yes17 yes18 yes19 no20 no21 no22 no23 criterion16 resistance to low25 high26 high27 low28 low29 high30 low31 strategic voting24 majority-favorite yes33 yes34 yes35 no36 no37 yes38 no39 criterion32 mutual-majority no41 no42 yes43 no44 no45 yes/no 46 no47 criterion40 prospects for high49 high50 high51 medium52 low53 low54 low55 U.S. adoption48 Condorcet-loser no57 yes58 yes59 no60 no61 yes/no 62 yes63 criterion56 Condorcet- no65 no66 no67 no68 no69 yes70 no71 winner criterion64 independence of no73 no74 yes75 yes/no 76 yes/no 77 yes/no 78 no79 clones criterion72 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 monotonicity yes no no yes yes yes/no yes criterion80 prepared by FairVote: The Center for voting and Democracy (April 2009). References Austen-Smith, David, and Jeffrey Banks (1991). “Monotonicity in Electoral Systems”. American Political Science Review, Vol. 85, No. 2 (June): 531-537. Brewer, Albert P. (1993). “First- and Secon-Choice Votes in Alabama”. The Alabama Review, A Quarterly Review of Alabama History, Vol. ?? (April): ?? - ?? Burgin, Maggie (1931). The Direct Primary System in Alabama. -
MONTANA BIRTH CERTIFICATE APPLICATION Cascade County Clerk & Recorder, 121 4Th St N Ste 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 406-454-6718 IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED Picture I.D
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ORDERING A BIRTH RECORD 1. Print, Fill out completely, and Sign application. (see below for who can order) 2. Provide proof of Identity (see acceptable methods below) 3. Enclose cashier’s check or money order (see Fees below) 4. Enclose a stamped self-addressed return envelope. (enclose a pre-paid envelope from express mail/UPS/FEDEX etc. for expedited service. We do not track mail once it leaves our office - keep all tracking info) 5. Mail application, I.D., payment, and return envelope to Cascade County Clerk and Recorder, 121 4th St N, Suite 1B1 Great Falls, MT 59401 WHO CAN ORDER A CERTIFIED BIRTH CERTIFICATE? Only those authorized by 50-15-121 MCA, which includes the registrant (14 years old or older) the registrant’s spouse, children, parents or guardian or an authorized representative, may obtain a certified copy of a birth record. Proof of relationship, guardianship or authorization is required. Step-relatives, in-laws, grandparents, siblings, aunts, uncles, cousins, ex-spouses, and a natural parent of an adoptive child or others are NOT eligible to receive a certified copy of a birth certificate. Non-certified informational/genealogy copies are available to anyone if record is more than 30 years old. Montana birth certificates are full size paper with a raised seal. Wallet size cards are not available. IDENTIFICATION IS REQUIRED •The person signing the request must provide an enlarged legible photocopy of both sides of their valid driver’s license or other legal picture identification with a signature, or the requestor must have the application notarized. -
State Abbreviations
State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La. -
Legislature by Lot: Envisioning Sortition Within a Bicameral System
PASXXX10.1177/0032329218789886Politics & SocietyGastil and Wright 789886research-article2018 Special Issue Article Politics & Society 2018, Vol. 46(3) 303 –330 Legislature by Lot: Envisioning © The Author(s) 2018 Article reuse guidelines: Sortition within a Bicameral sagepub.com/journals-permissions https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329218789886DOI: 10.1177/0032329218789886 System* journals.sagepub.com/home/pas John Gastil Pennsylvania State University Erik Olin Wright University of Wisconsin–Madison Abstract In this article, we review the intrinsic democratic flaws in electoral representation, lay out a set of principles that should guide the construction of a sortition chamber, and argue for the virtue of a bicameral system that combines sortition and elections. We show how sortition could prove inclusive, give citizens greater control of the political agenda, and make their participation more deliberative and influential. We consider various design challenges, such as the sampling method, legislative training, and deliberative procedures. We explain why pairing sortition with an elected chamber could enhance its virtues while dampening its potential vices. In our conclusion, we identify ideal settings for experimenting with sortition. Keywords bicameral legislatures, deliberation, democratic theory, elections, minipublics, participation, political equality, sortition Corresponding Author: John Gastil, Department of Communication Arts & Sciences, Pennsylvania State University, 232 Sparks Bldg., University Park, PA 16802, USA. Email: [email protected] *This special issue of Politics & Society titled “Legislature by Lot: Transformative Designs for Deliberative Governance” features a preface, an introductory anchor essay and postscript, and six articles that were presented as part of a workshop held at the University of Wisconsin–Madison, September 2017, organized by John Gastil and Erik Olin Wright. -
Wills of Cascade County Great Falls, Montana Volumes One & Three
WILLS OF CASCADE COUNTY GREAT FALLS, MONTANA VOLUMES ONE & THREE No record has been found of the Volume two of the Wills of Cascade County, Montana. Retyped by Thelma L. Marshall indexed by Eddie Josey-Wilson and Evan Heisel Great Falls Genealogy Society Great Falls, Montana April 1996 ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA 1884-1909 VOLUME 1 BLACK EAGLE CHAPTER DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GREAT FALLS, MONTANA ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY; MONTANA VOLUME 1 ABSTRACTS OF WILLS CASCADE COUNTY, MONTANA BLACK EAGLE CHAPTER DAUGHTERS OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION GREAT FALLS, MONTANA COPIED BY: Mrs. Lou Siniff Mrs. Theodore Cox Miss Ella Nelson Miss Grace Collins Grace Dutton Collins, State Chairman 1 951 - 1952 RICHARD WRIGHT of Fairfield St., Philadelphia, U.S.A. DATED: 3 Sep. 1888 WIFE: Elizabeth WRIGHT FATHER: James Wright SISTERS: Charlotte Wright, Rebecca Wright (wife of James Wright)Maria Moore (wife of J.W. MOORE). BROTHERS: William, Arthur, late brother Edmund EXECUTORS: Brother Arthur Wright, Wife Elizabeth Wright and sister Charlotte Wright. WITNESSES: S. Harlan Price and Wm.H. Walker. "Should I die in England I wish to be buried in the lot beside my father and mother, in the cemetery at Oday, Yorkshire in England. If I die away from England I wish a stone to be erected on this lot giving my birth and death dates." JAMES STONE of Great Falls, Cascade County, Montana. DATED: 27 March 1891 HEIR: In view of the fact that Thomas E. Brady has loaned me large sums of money and cared for me during this my last illness I bequeath to him all my properties, chattels and debts. -
Voting Procedures and Their Properties
Voting Theory AAAI-2010 Voting Procedures and their Properties Ulle Endriss 8 Voting Theory AAAI-2010 Voting Procedures We’ll discuss procedures for n voters (or individuals, agents, players) to collectively choose from a set of m alternatives (or candidates): • Each voter votes by submitting a ballot, e.g., the name of a single alternative, a ranking of all alternatives, or something else. • The procedure defines what are valid ballots, and how to aggregate the ballot information to obtain a winner. Remark 1: There could be ties. So our voting procedures will actually produce sets of winners. Tie-breaking is a separate issue. Remark 2: Formally, voting rules (or resolute voting procedures) return single winners; voting correspondences return sets of winners. Ulle Endriss 9 Voting Theory AAAI-2010 Plurality Rule Under the plurality rule each voter submits a ballot showing the name of one alternative. The alternative(s) receiving the most votes win(s). Remarks: • Also known as the simple majority rule (6= absolute majority rule). • This is the most widely used voting procedure in practice. • If there are only two alternatives, then it is a very good procedure. Ulle Endriss 10 Voting Theory AAAI-2010 Criticism of the Plurality Rule Problems with the plurality rule (for more than two alternatives): • The information on voter preferences other than who their favourite candidate is gets ignored. • Dispersion of votes across ideologically similar candidates. • Encourages voters not to vote for their true favourite, if that candidate is perceived to have little chance of winning. Ulle Endriss 11 Voting Theory AAAI-2010 Plurality with Run-Off Under the plurality rule with run-off , each voter initially votes for one alternative. -
Partners and Mini-Grant Awardees Alaska Oklahoma Juneau Altus Pawhuska Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Ranch Good Days, Inc
Children’s Savings Account (CSA) Partners and Mini-Grant Awardees Alaska Oklahoma Juneau Altus Pawhuska Tlingit-Haida Regional Housing Ranch Good Days, Inc. Osage Financial Resources Inc. Authority Mini-Grant Awardee CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Mini-Grant Awardee Osage Nation Financial Assistance Seldovia Anadarko Department CSA Partner Seldovia Tribal Village The Wichita and Affiliated Tribes Mini-Grant Awardee CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Pawnee BeLieving in Native Generations Pawnee Tribe Title VI Elderly CSA Partner Meals Program Maine CSA Partner Orono Anadarko Public Schools Indian Education Program Ponca City Four Directions Development CSA Partner Corporation Ponca Tribe Head Start Mini-Grant Awardee Carnegie CSA Partner Kiowa Tribe Shawnee CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Minnesota Citizen Potawatomi Community Ogema Kaw City Development Corporation CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Kaw Nation White Earth Investment Absentee Shawnee Housing Authority Initiative Mini-Grant Awardee CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Mini-Grant Awardee Miami The Modoc Tribe & the Modoc Tahlequah Montana Housing Authority of Oklahoma United Keetoowah Band of Lame Deer CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Cherokee Indians Mini-Grant Awardee The Housing Authority of the Peoria People’s Partner for Community Tribe of Indians in Oklahoma Cherokee Nation Child Support Program Development (working with the CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee CSA Partner Chief Dull Knife Tribal College The American Indian Resource Center Cooperative Extension Service) Norman CSA Partner and Mini-Grant Awardee Mini-Grant Awardee The Native Alliance Against Violence Cherokee Nation Commerce Services North Carolina Mini-Grant Awardee Mini-Grant Awardee Cherokee Okmulgee Wewoka The Housing Authority of the The Sequoyah Fund, Inc. -
Chapter 6 Michigan's Absentee Voting Process
ELECTION OFFICIALS’ MANUAL Michigan Bureau of Elections Chapter 6, October 2020 Chapter 6 Michigan’s Absentee Voting Process TABLE OF CONTENTS Note on October 2020 Updates .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Eligibility ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Application Process: ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Maintaining a Permanent Absent Voter Application List ............................................................................................................. 4 Submission of Absent Voter Ballot Applications .......................................................................................................................... 4 Office Hours on Saturday and/or Sunday Preceding Election ...................................................................................................... 5 Restrictions on Possession of Signed Absentee Ballot Applications ............................................................................................ 6 Application Verification Requirement ......................................................................................................................................... 6 Issuance of Absentee -
The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark
The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark GUIDE TO THE DANISH ELECTORAL SYSTEM 00 Contents 1 Contents Preface ....................................................................................................................................................................................................3 1. The Parliamentary Electoral System in Denmark ..................................................................................................4 1.1. Electoral Districts and Local Distribution of Seats ......................................................................................................4 1.2. The Electoral System Step by Step ..................................................................................................................................6 1.2.1. Step One: Allocating Constituency Seats ......................................................................................................................6 1.2.2. Step Two: Determining of Passing the Threshold .......................................................................................................7 1.2.3. Step Three: Allocating Compensatory Seats to Parties ...........................................................................................7 1.2.4. Step Four: Allocating Compensatory Seats to Provinces .........................................................................................8 1.2.5. Step Five: Allocating Compensatory Seats to Constituencies ...............................................................................8 -
Ballot Drop Box Paper
This document is one in a series created as part of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) Elections Infrastructure Government Coordinating Council and Sector Coordinating Council’s Joint COVID Working Group. These documents provide guidance for state, local, tribal, and territorial election officials on how to administer and secure election infrastructure in light of the COVID-19 epidemic. Ballot Drop Box Overview A ballot drop box provides a secure and convenient means for voters to return their mail ballot. A drop box is a secure, locked structure operated by election officials where voters may deliver their ballots from the time they receive them in the mail up to the time polls close on Election Day. Ballot drop boxes can be staffed or unstaffed, temporary or permanent. Unstaffed drop boxes are typically available 24 hours a day and permanently anchored in place. Staffed drop boxes are typically available during regular business hours and monitored by trained workers during those hours. Whether you are standing up a temporary vote-by-mail program statewide or locally, or you plan to develop a permanent program of voting primarily by mail, there are a few things to know and consider when planning for the use of ballot drop boxes. General Considerations Why do you need ballot drop-off locations when you are paying for return postage? Some voters prefer to deliver their mail ballots to a drop box rather than sending them back through the mail. These voters may be motivated by lack of trust in the postal process, fear that their ballot could be tampered with, or concern that their signature will be exposed.