Historical Peninsula

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Historical Peninsula The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 2 859 Site management process and urban renewal in Istanbul: Historical Peninsula S. Turgut Department of Urban & Regional Planning, Y ı ld ı z Technical University, I s t a n b u l , Turkey Abstract Site management has become a matter standing out in our country in recent years. The Historical Peninsula, the most remarkable site with the ongoing implementations in this process was proclaimed a Historic Site by the Cultural and Natural Heritage Conservation Board in 1995. The Historical Peninsula, having an important role in the Istanbul Metropolitan Area, was subjected to new organization by Law No. 5226 “Amendment to Cultural and Natural Heritage Conservation Law and Various Other Laws” which was enacted in 2004 Accordingly, new concepts including “Management Area”, “Management Plan” and “Conservation, Implementation, Audit Bureau” were defined by the law. Parallel to this restructuring process, the entire area of the Historical Peninsula was proclaimed for renovation, pursuant to Law No. 5366 on the ‘Preservation by Renovation and Utilization by Revitalizing of Deteriorated Immovable Historical and Cultural Properties’ which came into force in 2005, and a number of renovation projects were launched. One of the main problems at the Historical Peninsula is the concurrent execution of a large number of plans and projects at the site in varying scales. This phenomenon challenges the management of the site. The Master Zoning Plan for the Conservation of the Historical Peninsula, which is still pending for enactment, is a current gap that needs to be filled within this process, while uncoordinated renovation projects continue to have a dominant impact over the area, along with the lack of plans and the continuing site management process. In this study, the ongoing planning and urban renewal efforts at the Historical Peninsula will be discussed in conjunction, along with an attempt to analyze the WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Vol 155, © 2012 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) doi:10.2495/SC120722 860 The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 2 implementations, the relationship between these processes and site management will be questioned. Keywords: Istanbul, Historical Peninsula, site management, urban renewal, urban conservation, planning mamagement process. 1 Introduction As a privileged city to serve as the capital to the Roman, Byzantine and Ottoman Empires, Istanbul has always been the center of interest due to the geopolitical and geostrategic importance of its location, amidst the Black Sea, the Balkans, Anatolia and the Mediterranean. As a transcontinental city at the crossroads of Europe and Asia, Istanbul is a global city. The first settlements in Istanbul dates back 300 thousand years, while the city has a 3 millennium long urban history and served as a capital for almost 1600 years, the city has hosted several civilizations and cultures over the ages, and the long history of coexistence of different religions, languages and nations converted the city into a unique mosaic of diversities. Being one of the few cities in the world which left behind epochs as a power center and a node for every aspect of civilization and Istanbul has been and still is a global metropolis from past to present. The Historical Peninsula which will be discussed in this paper is actually the headland extending from Sarayburnu (Seraglio Point) to the enclosing city walls at back, between Marmara and the Golden Horn, which gave birth and served as the capital to several great empires along the world history. The entire city of Istanbul has taken over the name of this small enclosure, which covers a 3% portion of the city. The Historical Peninsula surrounded by city walls and seaward ramparts host a unique mosaic of cultural heritage of civilizations, piled on top of each other layer by layer. The Historical Peninsula is one of the very few locations which host an immense and diverse cultural heritage that one can not easily see in any corner of the world. Today the site still maintains these assets as in the past. The four chief sections of the headland are; The Archaeological Park on the Historical Peninsula; Süleymaniye Quarter hosting the bazaars and the surrounding local settlements, Zeyrek Quarter hosting the Church of Christ Pantokrator (today Zeyrek Mosque) and the area hosting the remains of abandoned Palace of Blachernae extending along both sides of the Theodosian Wall. This historic capital is adorned with numerous unparalleled monumental structures including, many architecture works of the Imperial period, Sultanahmet Mosque (The Blue Mosque), Sokullu Mehmet Paşa Mosque, Yeni Cami (Mosque of the Valide Sultan) from the 17th Century, Topkapı Palace a 15th century as a waterside palace with a compound of 700,000 square meters, Hippodrome of Constantine, the Valens Aqueduct, Hagia Sophia Cathedral, St. Irene, Justinian St. Sergius and Bacchus churches, Church of Christ Pantokrator ordered by Byzantine Empress Eirene Komnena and constructed under sponsorship of John II Komnenos, Chora Church, known for its 14th and 15th Century mosaics, and many baths, cisterns, and sarcophagi, today the location is governed within the municipal area of Fatih county [1]. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Vol 155, © 2012 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 2 861 Figure 1: Location and view of the peninsula. Historical locations of Istanbul reflecting an outstanding universal value and containing the most important features of the city was protected from the degenerative impacts of major changes of 19th and 20th centuries and later the historical heritage was registered and laws to preserve this heritage were enacted. (Istanbul Historical Peninsula Management Plan Draft Report 2011). 1.1 Istanbul in the world heritage list Following the adoption of World Heritage Convention by UNESCO Member States in 1972 and founding of World Heritage Committee and the World Heritage Foundation in 1976, it took only 10 years for Istanbul (Historic Areas of Istanbul) to be included in the World Heritage List making the city one of first examples of in this process. A look into the ramp up course of sites enlisted in years, from 12 in 1978, to 215 in 1985 and of 690 in 2000 and most recently 878 in 2008, solidifies this expression. The “Convention Concerning the Conservation of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage” adopted at the 16th General Conference of UNESCO in 1972 aims to build the public awareness to protect and conserve sites with outstanding universal value, which are deemed to be common inheritance of the mankind and to ensure necessary cooperation to keep these assets alive, which are threatened and degenerated by various factors [2]. The World Heritage List first proclaimed in 1978 by the World Heritage Committee recognized four sites of Istanbul in the cultural heritage list in 1985, two years after the participation of Turkey in 1983. The sites referred above are: 1- Archaeological Park-Topkapı Palace and Sultanahmet Mosque Region 2- Süleymaniye Quarter 3- Zeyrek Quarter 4- Byzantine seaward ramparts and city walls WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Vol 155, © 2012 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) 862 The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 2 Figure 2: World heritage sites of Istanbul. The inclusion of these four sites in the World Heritage List requires adequate conservation through applicable legislations. The Archaeological Park was proclaimed under conservation in 1953, while Zeyrek and Süleymaniye were taken under conservation in 1977 and 1979 respectively and finally, the city walls (Theodosian Walls) and its environs were taken under conservation in 1981. Istanbul was included in the World Heritage List based on the criteria (i), (ii), (iii) and (iv) sought for sites with outstanding universal value. These criteria are as follows. (i) Historical sites of Istanbul feature a number of unique monuments like the Hagia Sophia, a universal architectural masterpiece designed by Anthemius of Tralles and Isidore of Miletus between 532 and 537 A.D. and Süleymaniye Complex built by Mimar Sinan between 1550 and 1557 as a marvelous landmark representing Ottoman architecture. (ii) The monuments in Istanbul made significant effects on the territories they are located within. Such as the 6650 meters long city walls, on order of Theodosius II, as a prominent example of fortifications and military architecture along the history (iii) Istanbul hosts a vast number of functional buildings which represent great architectural and artistic importance by the architectural elements they feature. Fresco adorned churches, monumental cisterns, sarcophagi, mosques and baths can be named as several examples. (iv) The City owns a combination of buildings which make up a consistent unity of architectural and technical elements and constitute exceptional examples delineating the stages in human history. Topkapı Palace, Süleymaniye Mosque and its complex, caravanserais, madrasahs, medical schools, almshouses and sarcophagi are particularly important in this sense. In the area, there are 10,183 pieces of registered cultural assets located within the Historical Peninsula. The total number of registered cultural assets present in the field is 9,421 with a breakdown of 4,089 monuments and 6,324 civil structures. 2,982 of the assets in this area are listed in the World Heritage. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment, Vol 155, © 2012 WIT Press www.witpress.com, ISSN 1743-3541 (on-line) The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 2 863 1.2 Conflict between the zoning process and the world heritage proclamation on the historic peninsula The Historical Peninsula was one of the first zones to be governed under a zoning plan in the republican period of the nation with reference to the historical and cultural diversity featured in the area. The earliest zone planning efforts in the Historical Peninsula dates back to 1933, while the latest plan is the “1/5000 Scale Heritage Conservation and Urban Reconstruction Zoning Plan”, endorsed on Nov 2, 1990, was annulled on May 10, 1991 by a court ruling.
Recommended publications
  • Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project
    International Journal of Architectural Heritage Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration ISSN: 1558-3058 (Print) 1558-3066 (Online) Journal homepage: https://www.tandfonline.com/loi/uarc20 Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project Yonca Kösebay Erkan To cite this article: Yonca Kösebay Erkan (2012) Railway Heritage of Istanbul and the Marmaray Project, International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6:1, 86-99, DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 Published online: 03 Oct 2011. Submit your article to this journal Article views: 439 View related articles Citing articles: 3 View citing articles Full Terms & Conditions of access and use can be found at https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=uarc20 International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 6: 86–99, 2012 Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC ISSN: 1558-3058 print / 1558-3066 online DOI: 10.1080/15583058.2010.506622 RAILWAY HERITAGE OF ISTANBUL AND THE MARMARAY PROJECT Yonca Kösebay Erkan Kadir Has University, Istanbul, Turkey This study explores the significance of Istanbul’s railway heritage and discusses the criteria for evaluating the historical importance, architectural value, and social issues surrounding the city’s rail system, leading into an examination of the consequences of the Marmaray Project. The Marmaray Project is a commuter rail system designed to unify Istanbul’s two independent rail transportation systems, and it will connect Halkalı on the European side with Gebze on the Asian side of the city. With the beginnings of rail construction in the 1870s, the waters of the Bosphorus separated the Oriental Railway on the European side from the Anatolian and the Baghdad Railway, preventing a direct connection between Europe and Asia.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District
    Papers A Sustainable View to Fener ‐ Balat District Kishali E. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] Grecchi M. Politecnico di Milano, Building Environment Science Technology (BEST) [email protected] TRADITIONAL TECHNIQUES AND DISTRICT REHABILITATION Sustainable rehabilitation and preservation strategies in historic quarters Industrialisation, started with Industrial Revolution in mid 18th century by the invention of machines but advanced fast in early 19th century by establishing factories in large areas, has changed various aspects of life in terms of economy, architecture, design, and construction, rate of production, social life and politics. However one aspect, the nature, became very important in architecture field when there have been various and serious problems on four basic elements of planet: earth, air, water and fire. All these elements have been influenced badly after industrialisation period due to high demand for rapid and heavy construction regarding the all aspects above. Nowadays, in architecture it is inevitable to find a link between nature and construction, engineering and design to preserve the resources of life which can be called sustainability. This link is very essential in today's new architectural designs to sustain environment but it is more interesting and difficult to find the sustainable link for historical buildings which were constructed during economical revolutions. The structures were constructed with peculiar technology, serviceability in its own environment and definite district, as the time passes the possibility to withstand changing environment conditions would become complicated. In this paper, historical residential buildings, constructed in 19th century in Fener – Balat Istanbul, Turkey, an important example of cultural heritage district, will be analysed in terms of three different views.
    [Show full text]
  • Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey
    Advocacy Planning in Urban Renewal: Sulukule Platform As the First Advocacy Planning Experience of Turkey A thesis submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Cincinnati in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Community Planning of the College of Design, Architecture, Art, and Planning by Albeniz Tugce Ezme Bachelor of City and Regional Planning Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey January 2009 Committee Chair: Dr. David Varady Submitted February 19, 2014 Abstract Sulukule was one of the most famous neighborhoods in Istanbul because of the Romani culture and historic identity. In 2006, the Fatih Municipality knocked on the residents’ doors with an urban renovation project. The community really did not know how they could retain their residence in the neighborhood; unfortunately everybody knew that they would not prosper in another place without their community connections. They were poor and had many issues impeding their livelihoods, but there should have been another solution that did not involve eviction. People, associations, different volunteer groups, universities in Istanbul, and also some trade associations were supporting the people of Sulukule. The Sulukule Platform was founded as this predicament began and fought against government eviction for years. In 2009, the area was totally destroyed, although the community did everything possible to save their neighborhood through the support of the Sulukule Platform. I cannot say that they lost everything in this process, but I also cannot say that anything was won. I can only say that the Fatih Municipality soiled its hands. No one will forget Sulukule, but everybody will remember the Fatih Municipality with this unsuccessful project.
    [Show full text]
  • National Roma Integration Strategies
    err C EUROPEAN ROMA RIGHTS CENTRE The European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) is an international public interest law organisation working to combat anti- Roma Rights Romani racism and human rights abuse of Roma. The approach of the ERRC involves strategic litigation, international Journal of the european roma rights Centre advocacy, research and policy development and training of Romani activists. The ERRC has consultative status with the Council of Europe, as well as with the Economic and Social Council of the United Nations. The ERRC has been the recipient of numerous awards for its efforts to advance human rights respect of Roma: The 2013 PL Foundation Freedom Prize; the 2012 Stockholm Human Rights Award, awarded jointly to the ERRC and Tho- mas Hammarberg; in 2010, the Silver Rose Award of SOLIDAR; in 2009, the Justice Prize of the Peter and Patricia Gruber Foundation; in 2007, the Max van der Stoel Award given by the High Commissioner on National Minorities and the Dutch Foreign Ministry; and in 2001, the Geuzenpenning Award (the Geuzen medal of honour) by Her Royal Highness Princess Margriet of the Netherlands; Board of Directors Robert Kushen – (USA - Chair of the Board) | Dan Pavel Doghi (Romania) | James A. Goldston (USA) | Maria Virginia Bras Gomes (Portugal) | Jeno˝ Kaltenbach (Hungary) I Abigail Smith, ERRC Treasurer (USA) Executive Director Dezideriu Gergely Staff Adam Weiss (Legal Director) | Andrea Jamrik (Financial Officer) | Andrea Colak (Lawyer) | Anna Orsós (Pro- grammes Assistant) | Anca Sandescu (Human Rights Trainer)
    [Show full text]
  • Roma and Representative Justice in Turkey
    Roma and representative justice in Turkey Basak Akkan This Working Paper was written within the framework of Work Package 5 (justice as lived experience) for Deliverable 5.2 (comparative report on the tensions between institutionalized political justice and experienced (mis)recognition) July 2018 Funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union Acknowledgements I would like to express my gratitude to the participants of the research who genuinely shared their views. I would also like to express my thanks to Bridget Anderson and Pier-Luc Dupont for their comments on the earlier version of this report. Want to learn more about what we are working on? Visit us at: Website: https://ethos-europe.eu Facebook: www.facebook.com/ethosjustice/ Blog: www.ethosjustice.wordpress.com Twitter: www.twitter.com/ethosjustice Hashtag: #ETHOSjustice Youtube: www.youtube.com/ethosjustice European Landscapes of Justice (web) app: http://myjustice.eu/ This publication has been produced with the financial support of the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union. The contents of this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and can in no way be taken to reflect the views of the European Commission. Copyright © 2018, ETHOS consortium – All rights reserved ETHOS project The ETHOS project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No. 727112 2 About ETHOS ETHOS - Towards a European THeory Of juStice and fairness is a European Commission Horizon 2020 research project that seeks to provide building blocks for the development of an empirically informed European theory of justice and fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • Marmaray Project - Turkey
    MARMARAY PROJECT - TURKEY Istanbul is a city where historical and cultural values must be preserved and at the same time modern railway facilities have to be installed to decrease the environmental impact of public transportation and increase the capacity, reliability and comfort of the railway systems. The Project provides an upgrading of the commuter rail system in Istanbul, connecting Halkalı on the European side to the Asian side with an uninterrupted, modern, high-capacity commuter rail system. Railway tracks in both sides of Istanbul Strait will be connected to each other through a railway tunnel connection under the Istanbul Strait. The line goes underground at Yedikule, continues through the Yenikapı and Sirkeci new underground stations, passes under the Istanbul Strait, connects to the Üsküdar new underground station and emerges at Sögütlüçesme. The entire upgraded and new railway system will be approximately 76 km long. The main structures and systems; include the immersed tube tunnel, bored tunnels, cut-and-cover tunnels, at - grade structures, three new underground stations, 37 surface stations (renovation and upgrading), operations control centre, yards, workshops, maintenance facilities, upgrading of existing tracks including a new third track on ground, completely new electrical and mechanical systems and procurement of modern railway vehicles. The idea of a railway tunnel under the Istanbul Strait was first raised in 1860. However, where the tunnel under the Istanbul Strait crosses the deepest parts of the Strait, the old-fashioned techniques would not allow the tunnel to be on or under the seabed, and therefore the design indicated a "floating" type of tunnel placed on pillars constructed on the seabed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Hagia Sophia in Its Urban Context: an Interpretation of the Transformations of an Architectural Monument with Its Changing Physical and Cultural Environment
    THE HAGIA SOPHIA IN ITS URBAN CONTEXT: AN INTERPRETATION OF THE TRANSFORMATIONS OF AN ARCHITECTURAL MONUMENT WITH ITS CHANGING PHYSICAL AND CULTURAL ENVIRONMENT A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences of İzmir Institute of Technology in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in Architecture by Nazlı TARAZ August 2014 İZMİR We approve the thesis of Nazlı TARAZ Examining Committee Members: ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology _____________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ___________________________ Dr. Çiğdem ALAS 25 August 2014 ___________________________ Assist. Prof. Dr. Zeynep AKTÜRE Supervisor, Department of Architecture, İzmir Institute of Technology ____ ___________________________ ______________________________ Assoc. Prof. Dr. Şeniz ÇIKIŞ Prof. Dr. R. Tuğrul SENGER Head of the Department of Architecture Dean of the Graduate School of Engineering and Sciences ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor Assist.Prof.Dr.Zeynep AKTÜRE for her guidance, patience and sharing her knowledge during the entire study. This thesis could not be completed without her valuable and unique support. I would like to express my sincere thanks to my committee members Assist. Prof. Dr. Ela ÇİL SAPSAĞLAM, Dr. Çiğdem ALAS, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Erdem ERTEN and Assist. Prof. Dr. Zoltan SOMHEGYI for their invaluable comments and recommendations. I owe thanks to my sisters Yelin DEMİR, Merve KILIÇ, Nil Nadire GELİŞKAN and Banu Işıl IŞIK for not leaving me alone and encouraging me all the time. And I also thank to Seçkin YILDIRIMDEMİR who has unabled to sleep for days to help and motivate me in the hardest times of this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Texto Completo (Pdf)
    Patrimonio y Desarrollo. Estudios De la gloria de Bizancio a la Capitalidad Europea de la Cultura. Estrategias de intervención urbana en Estambul From Byzance´s glory to the European Capital of Culture. Urban intervention strategies in Istanbul María Pilar García Cuetos Profesora Titular, Universidad de Oviedo Resumen Las casas tradicionales de madera de Estambul constituyen una parte fundamental del patrimonio de la ciudad, pero desde los años cincuenta del siglo XX han ido desapareciendo, sustituidas por estructuras de hormigón. A partir de los años setenta, varios proyectos de restauración han intentado salvarlas, siguiendo concepciones muy diferentes sobre la restauración, sobre el concepto de la autenticidad y sobre la idea de ciudad. Desde las restauraciones basadas en la demolición/reconstrucción y en la recreación de escenarios urbanos para turistas, hasta las intervenciones que aúnan desarrollo social y recuperación patrimonial, se analizan las diversas estrategias de intervención en la ciudad. Palabras clave: Estambul, restauración, casas de madera, recuperación urbana, autenticidad. Abstract Traditional wooden houses are a fundamental part of Istambul heritage, but from the fifties of the 20th century they have been disappearing, replaced with structures of concrete. From the seventies, several restoration projects have tried to protect them, following different conceptions on restoration, on the concept of the authenticity, and on the idea of the city. From restorations based on the demolition / reconstruction and on the recreation of urban scenes for tourists, up to the interventions that join social development and cultural heritage restoration, the strategies of intervention in the city are analyzed. Keywords: Istanbul, restoration, wooden houses, urban intervention, authenticity.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecting Uskudar and Sarayburnu with Tubular Passage Way from Abdulhamit II
    27178 Gul Akdeniz et al./ Elixir His. Preser. 74 (2014) 27178-27188 Available online at www.elixirpublishers.com (Elixir International Journal) Historic Preservation Elixir His. Preser. 74 (2014) 27178-27188 Connecting uskudar and sarayburnu with tubular passage way from abdulhamit II. Period Gul Akdeniz 1, Mehmet Cercis Eri şmi ş1,* and Ahmet Ozan Gezerman 2 1Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Architecture, Department of Architecture, Istanbul, Turkey. 2Yildiz Technical University, Faculty of Chemical- Metallurgical Engineering, Department of Chemical Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey. ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The idea of passing the bosphorus under the sea with a tubular structure is evaluated for the Received: 9 April 2013; period in question. The evidence of the pocess of driling ground between Üsküdar and the Received in revised form: side across is analysed in detail as a proof indicating that this Project was thought to be 15 September 2014; realized. Main questions of the research is as follows. What is the current situation of these Accepted: 25 September 2014; projects. Why was there a need for a tubular passage way? Who were the contactors? What are the Project alternatives? What was the details of design proposals? Why were these Keywords cancelled? What kind of a perspective do these projects supply for today and tomorrow? The Abdülhamit, initial hypothesis before the study is that these projects were a part of governmental renewal Tubular Passage Way, program, these were developed as a solution for the problems of the city and cancelled due Transportation, to war or financial reasons, method is genetic and pragmatic historical research. Up to now, Railway, the subject has not been explained in such detail with the agreement text analysed and Project, sources used.
    [Show full text]
  • The Fener Greek Patriarchate
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS March - May 1998 Volume III - Number 1 THE FENER GREEK PATRIARCHATE A. SUAT BİLGE Dr. A. Suat Bilge is Professor of International Relations and Ambassador (retired). A controversy concerning the Fener Greek Patriarchate started in Turkey in 1997. It was stated that the Patriarchate could be used both for and against the interests of Turkey. On the one hand, it was claimed that the Patriarchate had intentions to establish itself as an ecumenical church and become a state like the Vatican; that the Orthodox world was trying to gain power in Turkey. On the other hand, some people stated that Turkey could benefit from the prestigious position of the Patriarchate and suggested an improvement in its status. First of all, I want to stress that the Patriarchate no longer enjoys the importance it once possessed in Greek-Turkish relations. Today, the Patriarchate is trying to become influential in Turkish-American relations. The Fener Greek Patriarchate is a historical religious institution. After the division of the Roman Empire, it became the church of the Byzantine Empire and obtained the status of an ecumenical church. With the collapse of the Byzantine Empire, the Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Ottoman Empire. Besides its functions as a religious institution, the Patriarchate was also granted the right to act as a ministry of Greek affairs by Mehmet II. He granted increased authority and privileges to the Patriarch. After the collapse of the Ottoman Empire, the Fener Greek Patriarchate became the church of the Greeks living within the Republic of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • Inter-Regional Migration and Intermarriage Among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol
    Sinan Zeyneloğlu, Yaprak Civelek, 139 ISSN 2071-789X Ibrahim Sirkeci RECENT ISSUES IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH Zeyneloğlu, S., Civelek, Y., Sirkeci, I. (2016), Inter-regional Migration and Intermarriage among Kurds in Turkey, Economics and Sociology, Vol. 9, No 1, pp. 139-161. DOI: 10.14254/2071-789X.2016/9-1/10 Sinan Zeyneloğlu, INTER-REGIONAL MIGRATION Zirve University, Gaziantep, Turkey, AND INTERMARRIAGE AMONG Regent’s Centre for Transnational KURDS IN TURKEY Studies, Regent’s University, London, UK, ABSTRACT. This study examines interregional migration E-mail: [email protected] and intermarriage of internal migrant Kurds in Turkey using the latest available census data. Unlike many other Yaprak Civelek, studies, birth region is used as a proxy of ethnicity due to Istanbul Arel University, the apparent language shift among the Kurds in Turkey. Istanbul, Turkey, To ensure comparability, only regions where both Turkish E-mail: and Kurdish populations co-exist are selected for analysis [email protected] of intermarriage. Analysis of language shift is based on the 2003 Turkish Demographic Health Survey data to ensure Ibrahim Sirkeci, temporal comparability with the 2000 Census. Variables Regent’s Centre for Transnational used for tabulation are sex, age group, region of residence Studies, and educational attainment. As prevalence of intermarriage Regent’s University, remains rather constant within each education category, London, UK, the increase in intermarriage of Kurds to non-Kurds at the E-mail: [email protected] aggregate level appears to be a product of rising education. Also the gender gap in favour of males appears to be a construct of differences in educational attainment levels, since Kurdish women out-marry more than their male co- ethnics once they have completed primary education or Received: October, 2015 studied further.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume
    The Study on Integrated Urban Transportation Master Plan for Istanbul Metropolitan Area in the Republic of Turkey Final Report Chapter 3 Chapter 3 Road Network and Traffic Volume 3.1 Road Network 3.1.1 Inter-regional Road Network 1) Existing Road Turkey is situated at the transit corridor between South-east Europe and the Middle East. Since “The Declaration for The Construction of International Arteries” (AGR) prepared by the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UN/ECE) in 1950 in Geneva, Turkey has developed international corridors connecting it to Southern Europe, because the international road network of AGR included an extension to Turkey. According to the provisions of AGR, two arteries should reach Turkey as E-Road. These are E-80 entering from the Bulgarian border (Kapikule) and E-90 entering from the Greek border (Ipsala). These two main routes link the International Road Network of Europe with the Middle East and Asia at southern and eastern borders of Turkey via Anatolia. Source: KGM, Ministry of Transportation Figure 3.1.1 International Road Network through Turkey, 2007 In addition to the E-Roads, the Trans-European Motorway (TEM) project is ongoing and it covers the whole country as an expressway network. The TEM highway network in Turkey starts from Edirne at the Bulgarian border and passes through Istanbul via the Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge and parts into two branches in Ankara going eastward and southward. Its eastern branch again parts into two branches in Askale. One of them reaches Trabzon in the Black Sea Region, and the other ends in Gurbulak at the Iranian border.
    [Show full text]