DOCSLIB.ORG

California Log of Bridges on State Highways

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
California Log of Bridges on State Highways October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS i October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS California Log of Bridges on State Highways Contents Bridge List Items and Keys to Coded Information...................................................ii County Table................................................................................................................v Alphabetic City Code Table.......................................................................................vi District Log..................................................................................................................1 Index of Bridge Numbers...........................................................................................I1 Prepared by California Department of Transportation Structure Maintenance & Investigations The information in this publication is available on the World Wide Web at: http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/structur/strmaint/brlog2.htm ii LO G OF BR IDGE S ON STA TE HIG HW A YSOctober, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYSOctober, BRIDGE LIST ITEMS AND KEYS TO CODED INFORMATION Postmile Entries in BOLD type show DISTRICT-COUNTY-ROUTE. Other entries show postmile prefix followed by postmile to the nearest hundredth of a mile. Prefixes of R, M, and N refer to re-aligned routes. Prefix L refers to a section or route paralleling another route. When the route is on the deck of the bridge, the postmile is recorded at the beginning of the structure (i.e. the lowest postmile on the bridge). When the route goes under the structure, the postmile is recorded on the underpassing route where the structure is first encountered. All other measuerments in this publication are given in meters. Bridge Number The official structure number assigned by CalTrans. The Bridge Number Suffix carries information about the function of the structure. Blank Structure carrying two-way traffic C Center structure E Connector structure F Connector structure G Connector structure H Connector structure J Outer outer left K Left outer highway structure L Left structure of left inner structure M Burried Hazard or miscellaneous structure R Right structure or right inner structure S Right outer highway structure T Outer outer right W Drainage pumping plant Y Structure on State-owned and maintained connections no on main highway (may be closed) Z Access to private property or closed with no access OU "O" Indicates that the route is carried on the deck of the structure "U" Indicates a route crossing under the structure. O - Structure Name U - Roadway Under or Route Information When route traffic is on (O) the structure, the structure name is shown. When route traffic is under (U) the structure, the roadway name is shown, otherwise, miscellaneous route information is shown. iii October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS Structure Types Code for main span type followed by approach span type (if different). First character (Material): Second & Third characters (Design): 1 = Concrete 01 = Slab 2 = Concrete continuous 02 = Stringer/Multi-beam or Girder 3 = Steel 03 = Girder and Floorbeam System 4 = Steel continuous 04 = Tee Beam 5 = Prestressed concrete 05 = Box Beam or Girders - Multiple 6 = Prestressed concrete continuous 06 = Box Beam or Girders - Single or Spread 7 = Wood or timber 07 = Frame (except frame culverts) 8 = Masonry 08 = Orthotropic 9 = Aluminum, wrought iron, or cast iron 09 = Truss - Deck 0 = Other 10 = Truss - Thru 11 = Arch - Deck 12 = Arch - Thru 13 = Suspension 14 = Stayed Girder 15 = Movable - Lift 16 = Movable - Bascule 17 = Movable - Swing 18 = Tunnel 19 = Culvert 21 = Segmental Box Girder 22 = Channel Beam 00 = Other City CalTrans alphabetic code for the city or government land within whose limits the bridge exists. The Alphabetic City Codes Table shows the full city names corresponding to these codes. Where a name is preceeded by an asterisk, it indicates a bridge on government lands not within any city limits. Bridge Length The length of the structure from paving notch to paving notch in meters. Width The out-to-out width of the structure to the nearest tenth of a meter. For through structures, the lateral clearance between superstructure members. For flared structures, the minimum deck width. No width is shown for non-grade-top culverts or structures not carrying vehicular traffic, such as underpasses or pedestrian overcrossings. Number of Spans The number of span in the structure. Upper-level spans of double deck structures are not included in this count. Min VC Over Roadway The minimum vertical clearance over the traveled way portion of the ROUTE in meters. In the case of arches, tunnels, through trusses, etc, where the minimum clearance does not give a true picture, an asterisk ("*") is shown after the clearance. In such cases, an accurate depiction of the available vertical clearance may be obtained from the structure clearance diagram which resides within the office of Structure Maintenance and Investigations. Sidewalk Widths The minimum width of left and right sidewalks or curbs, to the nearest tenth of a meter. Where this value is 1 meter or greater, the structure is considered to carry pedestrian traffic. iv October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS Year Built (Original Construction) and Year Widened or Extended The year of original construction. For some older bridges, this may be an estimate. Permit Rating Permit ratings are shown for information only. They should not be used for permit issuance. The permit rating is usually a string of five characters showing permit capacity for 5,7,9,11, and 13 axle vehicles. Where a single character is shown, it represents an "administrative" rating. P Purple permit capacity G Green permit capacity O Orange permit capcity X No permit capacity Permit rating are for information only. They are not to be used for permit issuance. P (Posting) Posting - B Open - posting recommended D Open under temporary conditions E Open - temporary structure G New structure - not yet open K Closed to all traffic M Closed or partially closed pending repairs J Posted for load v October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS COUNTY NAMES, NUMBERS AND ABBREVIATION County No. Abbr. County No. Abbr. Alameda 33 ALA Del Norte 1 DN Alpine 31 ALP Siskiyou 2 SIS Amador 26 AMA Modoc 3 MOD Butte 12 BUT Humboldt 4 HUM Calaveras 30 CAL Trinity 5 TRI Colusa 15 COL Shasta 6 SHA Contra Costa 28 CC Lassen 7 LAS Del Norte 1 DN Tehama 8 TEH El Dorado 25 ED Plumas 9 PLU Fresno 42 FRE Mendocino 10 MEN Glenn 11 GLE Glenn 11 GLE Humboldt 4 HUM Butte 12 BUT Imperial 58 IMP Sierra 13 SIE Inyo 48 INY Lake 14 LAK Kern 50 KER Colusa 15 COL Kings 45 KIN Yuba 16 YUB Lake 14 LAK Nevada 17 NEV Lassen 7 LAS Sutter 18 SUT Los Angeles 53 LA Placer 19 PLA Madera 41 MAD Sonoma 20 SON Marin 27 MRN Napa 21 NAP Mariposa 40 MPA Yolo 22 YOL Mendocino 10 MEN Solano 23 SOL Merced 39 MER Sacramento 24 SAC Modoc 3 MOD El Dorado 25 ED Mono 47 MNO Amador 26 AMA Monterey 44 MON Marin 27 MRN Napa 21 NAP Contra Costa 28 CC Nevada 17 NEV San Joaquin 29 SJ Orange 55 ORA Calaveras 30 CAL Placer 19 PLA Alpine 31 ALP Plumas 9 PLU Tuolumne 32 TUO Riverside 56 RIV Alameda 33 ALA Sacramento 24 SAC San Francisco 34 SF San Benito 43 SBT San Mateo 35 SM San Bernardino 54 SBD Santa Cruz 36 SCR San Diego 57 SD Santa Clara 37 SCL San Francisco 34 SF Stanislaus 38 STA San Joaquin 29 SJ Merced 39 MER San Luis Obispo 49 SLO Mariposa 40 MPA San Mateo 35 SM Madera 41 MAD Santa Barbara 51 SB Fresno 42 FRE Santa Clara 37 SCL San Benito 43 SBT Santa Cruz 36 SCR Monterey 44 MON Shasta 6 SHA Kings 45 KIN Sierra 13 SIE Tulare 46 TUL Siskiyou 2 SIS Mono 47 MNO Solano 23 SOL Inyo 48 INY Sonoma 20 SON San Luis Obispo 49 SLO Stanislaus 38 STA Kern 50 KER Sutter 18 SUT Santa Barbara 51 SB Tehama 8 TEH Ventura 52 VEN Trinity 5 TRI Los Angeles 53 LA Tulare 46 TUL San Bernardino 54 SBD Tuolumne 32 TUO Orange 55 ORA Ventura 52 VEN Riverside 56 RIV Yolo 22 YOL San Diego 57 SD Yuba 16 YUB Imperial 58 IMP vi October, 2018 LOG OF BRIDGES ON STATE HIGHWAYS ALPAHBETIC CITY CODES City Code City City Code City City Code City 0000 00000 BLV BELVEDERE CMAD CORTE MADERA ADA ARCADIA BLY BLYTHE CMB CAMPBELL ADEL ADELANTO BMT BELMONT CML CARMEL-BY-THE-SEA AGRH AGOURA HILLS BMTN BLOOMINGTON CMRC COMMERCE ALA ALAMEDA BONT BONITA CMRL CAMARILLO ALB ALBANY BOST BOSTONIA CMS COSTA MESA ALH ALHAMBRA BPK BUENA PARK CMSA CALIMESA ALMO ALAMO BRB BURBANK CND CONCORD ALT ALTURAS BRE BREA CNG CORNING ALTA ALTADENA BRW BRAWLEY CNLK CANYON LAKE ALV ALISO VIEJO BSBN BRISBANE COA COACHELLA AMA AMADOR CITY BSW BARSTOW COL COLTON AMCN AMERICAN CANYON BTWD BRENTWOOD COM COMPTON ANA ANAHEIM BURE *BUREAU OF RECLAMATION COR CORONA AND ANDERSON BURL BURLINGAME CORD CORONADO ANDP ALONDRA PARK BVHS BEVERLY HILLS COTI COTATI ANG ANGELS BWP BALDWIN PARK COV COVINA ANT ANTIOCH BYWD BAYWOOD-LOS OSOS CPO CUPERTINO APLV APPLE VALLEY CADE CASA DE ORO-MOUNT HELIX CPTL CAPITOLA ARC ARCATA CAEL CARMICHAEL CRC CRESCENT CITY ARDN ARDEN-ARCADE CAL CALABASAS CRCN CORCORAN ARGD ARROYO GRANDE CALC CALIFORNIA CITY CRSN CARSON ART ARTESIA CAMA CAMP PENDLETON SOUTH CRTS CERRITOS ARV ARVIN CAMN CAMP PENDLETON NORTH CSTG CALISTOGA ASHD ASHLAND CAPA CAMERON PARK CTHC CATHEDRAL CITY ATAS ATASCADERO CARP CARPINTERIA CYP CYPRESS ATN ATHERTON CAVA CASTRO VALLEY CYTN CLAYTON ATW ATWATER CBD CARLSBAD DAPT DANA POINT AUB AUBURN CDHY CUDAHY DBA DINUBA AVA AVALON CER CERES DBLN DUBLIN AVDH AVOCADO HEIGHTS CFX COLFAX DHSP DESERT HOT SPRINGS AVNL AVENAL CHC CHICO DLC DALY CITY AZU AZUSA CHLD CHERRYLAND DLMR DEL MAR BAN BANNING CHN CHINO DLN DELANO BAU
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project
    LLNL-AR-820616 L L NFloodplain and Wetland L - XAssessment for the Site 300 X XEntrance/Exit Corral X -Hollow Road Widening X X XProject Adjacent to the X XLawrence Livermore National Laboratory Experimental Test Site March 15, 2021 Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Prepared by: Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC Environmental Functional Area Water Resources and Environmental Planning Group Prepared for: U.S. Department of Energy National Nuclear Security Administration Livermore Field Office Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is operated by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy, National Nuclear Security Administration under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory ii Floodplain and Wetland Assessment for the Site 300 Entrance/Exit Corral Hollow Road Widening Project Table of Contents Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description.......................................................................................................................... 1 Description of the Project Site ........................................................................................................ 2 Potential Floodplains Impacts ......................................................................................................... 3 Potential Wetlands Impacts............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Info Session
    UPM information session Paso de los Toros November, 2020 Information session contents • Progress of the UPM Paso de los Toros project • Management and protocols implemented against COVID-19 • Monitoring of environmental conditions • Strengthening the development of the communities • New nursery in Sarandí del Yí • The value of opportunities • More than 3,000 Uruguayans work at the 16 construction sites - “Via Trabajo” as a generator of employment | © UPM Progress of the UPM Paso de los Toros pulp mill proj| ©ect UPM Progress of the UPM Paso de los Toros pulp mill project 2020 2021 2022 S1 S1 S1 Site preparation and Mechanical, automation Commissioning and road access and electrical installations production tests Civil Pulp mil construction commissioning 4 | © UPM Project progress within the planned schedule • The construction of the UPM Paso de los Toros pulp mill and sites linked to the project are progressing as planned. Earthmoving works continue, civil construction has started and internal road works are in progress. The Camino El Tala road work have been completed while the access from Route 5 to the new road is advancing. • The pulp mill chimney reached its maximum height of 127 meters. In addition, the foundation works began in the areas of pulp production processes, such as fiber line, cooling towers, drying plant, recovery boiler, turbines and evaporation plant. • In the port of Montevideo, the works related to the specialized pulp terminal are progressing at a good pace and the filling of the area has been completed. Construction of the pulp storage site, tank park and steel structures that will be used to unload pulp bales by rail are ongoing.
    [Show full text]
  • 8.3 Hydrology and Water Quality
    County of Mariposa General Plan – Volume III Technical Background Report 8.3 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY This section describes the natural and physical water environments that occur within Mariposa County, including lands managed by the United States Department of the Interior (USDI) and United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and State of California. It addresses potential specific and cumulative impacts to hydrology and water quality of these lands that affect private property in the county, and its villages and towns. 8.3.01 HYDROLOGY The western portion of the County is relatively flat, with gently rolling hills that gradually increase toward the east. Moving eastward, the hills become more pronounced and the elevation quickly rises and falls through mountains and valleys. The elevation begins around 300 feet in the west and rises to nearly 11,000 feet in the east. Most inhabited regions are below 5,000 feet. Precipitation varies between the lower elevations in the western and southern portions of the County and the higher elevations in the eastern and northern portions of the County. Average precipitation ranges from about 15 inches annually in the lower elevations to about 50 inches at the higher elevations. Most of the annual precipitation falls between November and late April. Precipitation at the lower elevations occurs mainly in the form of rainfall with snowfall becoming the dominant form at the higher elevations. Melting of the winter snowpack at the higher elevations becomes the major source of runoff to the Merced River during the spring and summer months. SURFACE WATER HYDROLOGY Mariposa County contains three major drainage basins: the Merced River, Chowchilla/Fresno River, and a localized cluster of streams of the east valley known as the Lower Mariposa group of streams.
    [Show full text]
  • (Oncorhynchus Mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California
    Historical Distribution and Current Status of Steelhead/Rainbow Trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California Robert A. Leidy, Environmental Protection Agency, San Francisco, CA Gordon S. Becker, Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA Brett N. Harvey, John Muir Institute of the Environment, University of California, Davis, CA This report should be cited as: Leidy, R.A., G.S. Becker, B.N. Harvey. 2005. Historical distribution and current status of steelhead/rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in streams of the San Francisco Estuary, California. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration, Oakland, CA. Center for Ecosystem Management and Restoration TABLE OF CONTENTS Forward p. 3 Introduction p. 5 Methods p. 7 Determining Historical Distribution and Current Status; Information Presented in the Report; Table Headings and Terms Defined; Mapping Methods Contra Costa County p. 13 Marsh Creek Watershed; Mt. Diablo Creek Watershed; Walnut Creek Watershed; Rodeo Creek Watershed; Refugio Creek Watershed; Pinole Creek Watershed; Garrity Creek Watershed; San Pablo Creek Watershed; Wildcat Creek Watershed; Cerrito Creek Watershed Contra Costa County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 39 Alameda County p. 45 Codornices Creek Watershed; Strawberry Creek Watershed; Temescal Creek Watershed; Glen Echo Creek Watershed; Sausal Creek Watershed; Peralta Creek Watershed; Lion Creek Watershed; Arroyo Viejo Watershed; San Leandro Creek Watershed; San Lorenzo Creek Watershed; Alameda Creek Watershed; Laguna Creek (Arroyo de la Laguna) Watershed Alameda County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p. 91 Santa Clara County p. 97 Coyote Creek Watershed; Guadalupe River Watershed; San Tomas Aquino Creek/Saratoga Creek Watershed; Calabazas Creek Watershed; Stevens Creek Watershed; Permanente Creek Watershed; Adobe Creek Watershed; Matadero Creek/Barron Creek Watershed Santa Clara County Maps: Historical Status, Current Status p.
    [Show full text]
  • CAL FIRE 2014 Madera Mariposa Merced Unit
    Last update: 1 Feb 2012 UNIT STRATEGIC FIRE PLAN AMENDMENTS Page Numbers Description Updated Date Section Updated Updated of Update By 4/14 Contents Page ii 2014 Update P4224 5/14 Signature Page 1 Annual Update C4200 4/13 Executive Summary 2 Re-Write C4200 5/13 I 3-6 Re-Write 4200 5/14 II 7-8 Update P4224 4/13 III 9-10 Re-Write NK 4/13 IV 11-19 Update B4220 5/14 V 20-38 Update All Battalions 4/14 Appendix A 39-43 Update F4207 4/14 Appendix B 44 Update C4200 4/13 Appendix C 45-49 Update JP 4/13 Appendix C-1 50 Update JP 4/14 Appendix D 51 Update C4201 4/14 Appendix E 52 Update B4220 4/14 Appendix F 55-56 Update B4211 4/14 Appendix G 57-60 Update B4212 4/14 Appendix H 57-60 Update B4214 4/14 Appendix I 61-62 Update B4215 4/14 Appendix J 63-65 Update B16 4/14 Appendix K 66 Update B17 4/14 Appendix L 67-68 Update B18 4/13 Appendix M 69 Update JP 4/13 Exhibits: Maps 70-77 Update JP 6/1 Accomplishments 78-80 Re-Write P4224 i Last update: 1 May 2014 Table of Contents Table of Contents ....................................................................................................................... ii SIGNATURE PAGE .................................................................................................................... 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 2 SECTION I: UNIT OVERVIEW .................................................................................................. 3 UNIT DESCRIPTION ...........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 6 Road Network of the Study Area
    Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report CHAPTER 6 ROAD NETWORK OF THE STUDY AREA Feasibility Study for the Improvement of the National Route 2 and Route 7 Final Report 6 ROAD NETWORK OF THE STUDY AREA 6.1 Transportation System (1) Main Ports Inland water transport uses the Parana River and its tributary, the Paraguay River, connecting to the La Plata River on the downstream side. These rivers are the boundaries with Brazil and Argentina and most of the waterways are under joint management. This inland water transport is mainly used for international trade cargo. Principal export/import ports are described below: – Concepción Port: Located 1,940 km from Buenos Aires and in the independent management section of the Paraguay River running through Paraguay. This port is mainly used to load beans on vessels. – Asuncion Port: Located 1,630 km from Buenos Aires, this port is used for cotton export and principal everyday commodities, such as general cargoes and automobiles, are imported in containers via the Paraguay River. – Villeta Port: Located 37km to the south of Asuncion Port and used for export of beans and cotton. – Villa Hayes Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the import of steel making raw materials. – Villa Elisa Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the import of oils. – San Antonio Port: Located near Asuncion and used for the export of beans. – Vallemi Port: Port to import cement raw materials. – Encarnación: Located on the Parana River, 1,583km from Buenos Aires, and used for the export of beans.
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeografía Histórica Y Diversidad De Arañas Mygalomorphae De Argentina, Uruguay Y Brasil: Énfasis En El Arco Peripampásico
    i UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE LA PLATA FACULTAD DE CIENCIAS NATURALES Y MUSEO Biogeografía histórica y diversidad de arañas Mygalomorphae de Argentina, Uruguay y Brasil: énfasis en el arco peripampásico Trabajo de tesis doctoral TOMO I Lic. Nelson E. Ferretti Centro de Estudios Parasitológicos y de Vectores CEPAVE (CCT- CONICET- La Plata) (UNLP) Directora: Dra. Alda González Codirector: Dr. Fernando Pérez-Miles Argentina Año 2012 “La tierra y la vida evolucionan juntas”… León Croizat (Botánico y Biogeógrafo italiano) “Hora tras hora… otra de forma de vida desaparecerá para siempre de la faz del planeta… y la tasa se está acelerando” Dave Mustaine (Músico Estadounidense) A la memoria de mi padre, Edgardo Ferretti ÍNDICE DE CONTENIDOS TOMO I Agradecimientos v Resumen vii Abstract xi Capítulo I: Introducción general. I. Biogeografía. 2 II. Biogeografía histórica. 5 III. Áreas de endemismo. 11 IV. Marco geológico. 14 IV.1- Evolución geológica de América del Sur. 15 IV.2- Arco peripampásico. 23 V. Arañas Mygalomorphae. 30 VI. Objetivos generales. 34 Capítulo II: Diversidad, abundancia, distribución espacial y fenología de la comunidad de Mygalomorphae de Isla Martín García, Ventania y Tandilia. I. INTRODUCCIÓN. 36 I.1- Isla Martín García. 36 I.2- El sistema serrano de Ventania. 37 I.3- El sistema serrano de Tandilia. 38 I.4- Las comunidades de arañas en áreas naturales. 39 I.5- ¿Porqué estudiar las comunidades de arañas migalomorfas? 40 II. OBJETIVOS. 42 II.1- Objetivos específicos. 42 III. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS. 43 III.1- Áreas de estudio. 43 III.1.1- Isla Martín García. 43 III.1.2- Sistema de Ventania.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) APPRAISAL STAGE Report No.: AB1435 UY Transport Infrastructure Maintenance and Rural Access Project Name Public Disclosure Authorized Region LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Sector Roads and highways (60%);Sub-national government administration (15%);Ports, waterways and shipping (15%);Central government administration (10%) Project ID P057481 Borrower(s) REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY Implementing Agency Ministry of Transport and Civil Works (MTOP) Uruguay Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [ ] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared April 19, 2005 Date of Appraisal March 14, 2005 Public Disclosure Authorized Authorization Date of Board Approval June 7, 2005 1. Country and sector issues General Economic Context Between 1999 and 2001 Uruguay endured a prolonged economic recession that ended in a deep crisis in 2002. The slowdown was prompted by several external shocks: Brazilian devaluation (1999), foot and mouth disease outbreak (2001), and weak commodity prices and oil price increases. However, it was the Argentine debt, currency and financial crisis of 2002 that Public Disclosure Authorized triggered the crisis and output collapse in Uruguay. As a result, income inequality and unemployment rose (the latter increased from 11.4 percent in 1999 to 19.7. percent in late 2002), and the fiscal situation deteriorated (fiscal deficit increased from 1 percent of GDP in the 1990s to 4 percent in 2001). 1 Furthermore, a sharp devaluation of the peso in 2002 worsened public debt indicators because a large share of both domestic and foreign debt was held in dollars. The fiscal pressures exerted by the crisis together with a traditionally large participation of the public sector in the provision of infrastructure services, adversely affected their delivery and consequently, the competitiveness of the economy.
    [Show full text]
  • World Bank Document
    PROJECT INFORMATION DOCUMENT (PID) CONCEPT STAGE Report No.: AB977 Project Name UY Road Maintenance and Rural Access Region LATIN AMERICA AND CARIBBEAN Sector Roads and highways (75%); Sub-national government administration Public Disclosure Authorized (15%);Central government administration (10%); Project ID P057481 Borrower(s) REPUBLIC OF URUGUAY Implementing Agency Ministry of Transport and Civil Works Environment Category [ ] A [X] B [] C [ ] FI [ ] TBD (to be determined) Safeguard Classification [ ] S1 [ ] S2 [ ] S3 [ ] SF [ ] TBD (to be determined) Date PID Prepared June 14, 2004 Estimated Date of Appraisal October , 2004 Authorization Estimated Date of Board January, 2004 Approval 1. Key development issues and rationale for Bank involvement Public Disclosure Authorized Background Uruguay’s historically high level of economic and social development relative to the region, was further improved in the 1990’s due to a stint of steady economic growth during that period, where the average annual growth rate between 1990 and 1998 reached 3.6%. Many Millennium Development Goals had been attained or seemed attainable, and the Bank even envisioned the possibility of gradual disengagement. However, Uruguay entered into a severe economic recession which was compounded by several external shocks; Argentine crisis (2002), Foot and Mouth disease outbreak (2001), Brazilian devaluation (1999), and weak commodity prices and oil price increases. As a result, income inequality and unemployment rose (the latter rose from 11.4% in 1999 to 15.3% in 2001)1 , and the fiscal situation deteriorated (fiscal deficit increased from 1% of GDP in the 1990s to 4% in 2001). Furthermore, a sharp devaluation of the peso in Public Disclosure Authorized 2002 worsened public debt indicators because a large share of both domestic and foreign debt is held in dollars.
    [Show full text]
  • Earle E. Williams Papers, 1853-1983 (Bulk 1952-1983)
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/tf058000z8 No online items Guide to the Earle E. Williams papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Processed by The Bancroft Library staff The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Note History --History, California --History, Central Valley/SierraGeographical (By Place) --California --Central Valley/Sierra Guide to the Earle E. Williams BANC MSS 86/50 c 1 papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Guide to the Earle E. Williams Papers, 1853-1983 (bulk 1952-1983) Collection number: BANC MSS 86/50 c The Bancroft Library University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California Contact Information: The Bancroft Library. University of California, Berkeley Berkeley, California, 94720-6000 Phone: (510) 642-6481 Fax: (510) 642-7589 Email: [email protected] URL: http://bancroft.berkeley.edu Processed by: The Bancroft Library staff Date Completed: 1997 Encoded by: Xiuzhi Zhou © 1998 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. Collection Summary Collection Title: Earle E. Williams Papers, Date (inclusive): 1853-1983 Date (bulk): (bulk 1952-1983) Collection Number: BANC MSS 86/50 c Creator: Williams, Earle E. Extent: Number of containers: 7 cartonsLinear feet: 8.75 Repository: The Bancroft Library. Berkeley, California 94720-6000 Physical Location: For current information on the location of these materials, please consult the Library's online catalog. Abstract: Correspondence, writings, and research, chiefly relating to the history of Tracy and San Joaquin County, Calif.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Quality Control Plan, Sacramento and San Joaquin River Basins
    Presented below are water quality standards that are in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. EPA is posting these standards as a convenience to users and has made a reasonable effort to assure their accuracy. Additionally, EPA has made a reasonable effort to identify parts of the standards that are not approved, disapproved, or are otherwise not in effect for Clean Water Act purposes. Amendments to the 1994 Water Quality Control Plan for the Sacramento River and San Joaquin River Basins The Third Edition of the Basin Plan was adopted by the Central Valley Water Board on 9 December 1994, approved by the State Water Board on 16 February 1995 and approved by the Office of Administrative Law on 9 May 1995. The Fourth Edition of the Basin Plan was the 1998 reprint of the Third Edition incorporating amendments adopted and approved between 1994 and 1998. The Basin Plan is in a loose-leaf format to facilitate the addition of amendments. The Basin Plan can be kept up-to-date by inserting the pages that have been revised to include subsequent amendments. The date subsequent amendments are adopted by the Central Valley Water Board will appear at the bottom of the page. Otherwise, all pages will be dated 1 September 1998. Basin plan amendments adopted by the Regional Central Valley Water Board must be approved by the State Water Board and the Office of Administrative Law. If the amendment involves adopting or revising a standard which relates to surface waters it must also be approved by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) [40 CFR Section 131(c)].
    [Show full text]
  • Preliminary General Plan
    ® General Plan Revision Preliminary General Plan April 2015 ® General Plan Revision Preliminary General Plan Prepared for: California State Parks Off-Highway Motor Vehicle Recreation Division Edmund G. Brown, Jr. Governor John Laird Secretary, The Natural Resources Agency Lisa Mangat Acting Director, California State Parks P.O. Box 942896 Sacramento, CA 94296-0001 April 2015 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page ACRONYMS AND OTHER ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................ iv CHAPTER 1 – INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Local and Regional Context ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.2 Purpose of Acquisition ..................................................................................................... 1-1 1.3 Sense of Place .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.4 Site Characteristics ........................................................................................................... 1-3 1.5 Purpose of the General Plan ............................................................................................. 1-3 1.6 Organization of the General Plan ..................................................................................... 1-4 1.7 Subsequent Planning .......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]