<<

International Journal of Surgery Open 4 (2016) 31–32

Contents lists available at ScienceDirect

International Journal of Surgery Open

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ijso

Case Report Intentional impaction of by mattress sponge pieces (foreign bodies) leading to intestinal obstruction in a mentally ill patient: Case report and literature review Mohammad Bukhetan Alharbi *

Department of Surgery, Medical College, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), PO Box 5701, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

Article history: Background: It is more difficult for the treating team to make the right diagnosis at the right time in Received 12 May 2016 mentally ill patients due to poor history and sometimes a masked clinical presentation. The presence of Received in revised form 3 July 2016 an unprofessional guardian may increase the challenges, as in our case, due to hidden or even mislead- Accepted 4 July 2016 ing history, especially with an older age group. Intentionally inserted sponge material in the rectum to Available online 8 July 2016 reduce the frequency of loose stool evacuations in patients with diarrhoea is a new phenomenon not discussed in medical literature. Keywords: Case summary: We report a case of an 85-year-old bedridden female with a history of stroke, hemiple- Rectum gia, and dysarthria. She presented to our emergency department with significant abdominal distention Mattress sponge and vomiting. She was attended by an unprofessional guardian (hired by her family). The history pro- Intestinal obstruction vided by the guardian was of abdominal distention and constipation 5 days prior to presentation, followed by vomiting feculent material. A physical examination revealed she had a distended tympanic without organomegaly, scars, or hernia. A digital rectal exam revealed a few pieces of a foreign body similar to sponge material with a fully distended rectum with well-formed stool. The guardian admitted that this was a sponge material used by her to reduce the frequency of stool evacuation. Removal of the foreign body by the medical team led to complete recovery in the same day. Conclusion: The treating team may face more challenges in treating patients with an inability to provide a proper history, especially if accompanied by an unprofessional guardian. © 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

1. Introduction dysarthria secondary to old CVA. Her history was given by the guard- ian. The patient had abdominal distention and constipation 5 days The reasons for the insertion of rectal foreign bodies vary from prior to presentation, followed by feculent material vomitus. She sexually oriented purposes, assaults and other criminal acts, to in- had no previous abdominal surgeries and no abdominal wall hernia tentional placement [1]. Many publications have discussed the types complaints. A physical examination revealed stable vital signs and of foreign bodies found in the rectum, the effect of location on man- she was not in agony. She had a highly distended abdomen, tym- agement, and the different manoeuvres used to extract them [2,3]. panic, without peritoneal irritation signs. There were no scars on Despite that it is obvious that the management of foreign bodies the abdominal wall and no signs of hernia. A digital rectal exam re- in the rectum requires a well-organized process [4], the interrup- vealed three medium-sized pieces of material, like pieces of sponge, tion of faecal passage intentionally, with or without criminal amalgamated together at the level of the anorectal junction, with intention, is unusual. a full rectum with soft stool. There were no features of anal pa- thology. A manual evacuation was performed successfully. Abdominal 2. Case presentation X-rays showed a highly dilated small and large bowel, without spe- cific features otherwise. The laboratory results were normal. On An 85-year-old female presented to our emergency depart- interviewing the guardian (non-professional), she admitted using ment with her guardian (hired by her family). The patient had sponge material from the patient’s mattress to reduce the frequen- cy of passage of loose stools 2 weeks prior to the incident. She could not extract it afterwards. A Fleet was then used, followed by the passage of a large * Department of Surgery, Medical College, Al Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), PO Box 5701, Riyadh 11543, Saudi Arabia. amount of stool and gases. The patient felt completely recovered E-mail address: [email protected], [email protected]. in 12 hours and was sent home. A routine follow-up was uneventful. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijso.2016.07.001 2405-8572/© 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of Surgical Associates Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). 32 M.B. Alharbi / International Journal of Surgery Open 4 (2016) 31–32

3. Discussion References

Not many articles discuss the impact of a patient’s mental status [1] Ayantunde A. Approach to the diagnosis and management of retained rectal on the type or the reasons behind the presence of foreign bodies in the foreign bodies: clinical update. Tech Coloproctol 2013;17(1):13–20. [2] Memon JM, Memon NA, Khatri MK, Talpur AA, Ansari AG, Jamali AH, et al. Rectal rectum for mentally ill patients [5]. Koornstra and Weersma reported foreign body: not a rarity. Gomal J Med Sci 2004;5(2). many types of foreign bodies found in the rectum. We could not find [3] Koornstra JJ, Weersma RK. Management of rectal foreign bodies: description any comment on sponge material being a foreign body and causing an of a new technique and clinical practice guidelines. World J Gastroenterol 2008;14(27):4403–6. emergency event [3,6]. Some reports mentioned that a foreign body [4] Coskun A, Erkan N, Yakan S, Yıldirim M, Cengiz F. Management of rectal foreign in the rectum may occur after oral ingestion. The insertion of a foreign bodies. World J Emerg Surg 2013;8(1):11. body into the rectum may be for nonsexual reasons [7]. [5] Gunduz V, Altintoprak F, Asil K, Aksoy Y. Rectal foreign body deodorant bottle Treatment methods have been described for a foreign body near the in a schizophrenic patient. J Clin Case Rep 2014;4(409):2. [6] Clarke D, Buccimazza I, Anderson F, Thomson S. Colorectal foreign bodies. rectosigmoid junction, either through conscious sedation or anaesthe- Colorectal Dis 2005;7(1):98–103. sia [3]. The methods of extraction varied, including a transanal approach, [7] Khan SA, Davey CA, Khan SA, Trigwell PJ, Chintapatla S. Munchausen’s syndrome endoscopical, transabdominal exploration, and symphysiotomy [8]. presenting as rectal foreign body insertion: a case report. Cases J 2008;1(1): 243. Other novel approaches for extracting foreign bodies have been de- [8] Kasotakis G, Roediger L, Mittal S. Rectal foreign bodies: a case report and review scribed, mainly through the anal canal like a cork in a bottle, such as of the literature. Int J Surg Case Rep 2012;3(3):111–15. using obstetric forceps, a Foley catheter with , anal pres- [9] Johnson SO, Hartranft TH. Nonsurgical removal of a rectal foreign body using a vacuum extractor. Dis Colon Rectum 1996;39(8):935–7. sure with lower abdominal pressure, Kielland forceps, a rubber band [10] Han HJ, Joung SY, Park S-H, Min BW, Um JW. Transanal rectal foreign ligation technique, a SILS port, and vacuum extraction [9–16]. body removal using a SILS port. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2012;22(3):e157–8. [11] Sharma H, Banka S, Walton R, Memon M. A novel technique for nonoperative 4. Conclusion removal of round rectal foreign bodies. Tech Coloproctol 2007;11(1):58– 9. Uncommon causes of intestinal obstruction may be encoun- [12] Andrabi S, Johnson NA, Malik AH, Ahmed M. Extraction of a rectal foreign body-an alternative method. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg 2009;15(4):403– tered by the managing team, especially in mentally ill patients who 5. are not in an inpatient health facility. Rectal impaction by a foreign [13] Çalişkan C, Karaca C, Akgün E, Korkut MA. A new extraction technique for rectal body may require the clinician to take a more detailed history in foreign bodies with a rubber band ligation device. Surg Today 2010;40(6): order to explain its presence; the possibility that a criminal act has 583–5. [14] Clark S, Karanjia N. A cork in a bottle–a simple technique for removal of a rectal taken place should not be ruled out. foreign body. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2003;85(4):282. [15] Peet T. Removal of impacted rectal foreign body with obstetric forceps. Br Med Conflict of interest J 1976;1(6008):500–1. [16] Humes D, Lobo DN. Removal of a rectal foreign body by using a Foley catheter passed through a rigid sigmoidoscope. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62(4): There is no conflict of interest. 610.