Download Brexit-Negotiations-The-View-From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Brexit-Negotiations-The-View-From A Cicero Group analysis Brexit Negotiations - The View From the EU OCTOBER 2016 Foreword UK Prime Minister Theresa May has confirmed that Article 50 will Each Member State has a unique mixture of political, economic be triggered no later than March 2017. Once Article 50 is triggered, and social variables which exert domestic political pressure on the UK will enter into a complex and difficult negotiation in which its leaders and will inform its government’s negotiation position. the UK’s objectives are pitted against those of 27 Member States and the European institutions. In an effort to distil these varying positions, we have identified in our report a set of key variables in selected Member States. The structure of the EU’s negotiating team has become clearer These include the UK-Member State trade ties, the relative since June’s referendum. The Commission’s Chief Negotiator population sizes of UK and EU27 citizens resident within each Michel Barnier will lead the EU’s negotiations, drawing other’s territory, upcoming elections, the relative level of populist substantially on all Directorates-General for technical expertise or Eurosceptic support within the electorate and the presence and support. The political steer of Barnier’s negotiation position of a secessionist region that would seek to capitalise on Brexit must be provided by the Council. It will therefore be the task negotiations. of the Council’s Didier Seeuws to corral 27 Member States into a single position to provide the EU’s mandate. We set this out When collating these variables, we can identify Member States in the graphic on Page 4. Meanwhile, the Parliament will use that will pose an inherent challenge to a smooth negotiation for the threat of its veto to ensure its Brexit Representative, Guy domestic political reasons, their attachment to their citizens’ Verhofstadt, and his team are directly plugged into negotiations rights to reside in the UK or their limited economic ties with the from the start. UK. Key amongst these being France and the Visegrad Group of Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia – albeit for Reaching a consensus among Member States will be no small different reasons. feat for Seeuws. There is a misconception that Member States will inevitably refrain from imposing tough sanctions on the UK On the opposite end of the spectrum, the UK can look to Ireland through fear of harming their own economies. Similarly, there is and Denmark as Member States likely to provide the least a view that Germany’s economic ties with the UK will ultimately challenge to its negotiation position. That said, while there are see them persuade other Member States to adopt a more differences between the positions of these Member States, the accommodating position. size of these differences pale in comparison to the gulf between their collective positions and the UK’s. The reality is far more complicated and points towards a much more difficult negotiation than many in the UK acknowledge. The picture that emerges is that like the UK, other Member 2 11 October 2016 States’ negotiating position will be informed by their own Helena Walsh Alexander domestic considerations and interests. This means that they Executive Director Kneepkens may not always take economically rational decisions to prioritise Brussels Senior Account economic interests over political. Manager Finally, all Member States agree that the cost of a deal that makes leaving the EU look like a viable alternative to membership far outweighs the cost of new trade barriers. This simple calculation James Hughes Sebastian is likely to be the guiding principle of their negotiation. Account Director Damberg-Ott Account Manager We hope you find our report useful. George Winkler Account Executive 3 11 October 2016 Negotiating the UK’s withdrawal under Article 50 EUROPEAN COUNCIL EUROPEAN COMMISSION EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT POLITICAL OVERSIGHT TECHNICAL DETAIL FINAL APPROVAL All Member States Commission Parliamentary Plenary Member States feed into Directorate-Generals The Parliament must approve the Council through Barnier’s A50 Task Force will the final agreement by a Permanent draw directly on all DGs for simple majority of those Representations and technical support MEPs present during the vote Council configurations Commission Committee Council Secretariat Article 50 Task Force Verhofstadt will draft a General Coordinating Commission’s resolution, which will fall Council decides strategic, operational, legal under an as-yet determined negotiation mandate and and financial issues related to Parliamentary Committee – approves agreement by negotiations this may be a special Brexit QMV Committee, or pre-existing such as AFCO, INTA or AFET Council Task Force of Brexit Monitoring Group Head of the European the UK Brexit EU Chief As with the Parliament’s role Council Brexit Parliament Brexit Provides Barnier and his Negotiator in TTIP negotiations, a team the EU’s negotiation Task Force Representative Monitoring Group will likely Michel Barnier mandate and political Didier Seeuws Guy Verhofstadt be established to feed into steer negotiations UK Chief Negotiator 4 11 October 2016 Trade between Member States and the UK UK EXPORTS EU COUNTRY UK IMPORTS Austria €2.94bn Balance: €-2.24bn €5.18bn €19.50bn Belgium €30.18bn Balance: €-10.67bn €7.54bn Denmark €7.26bn Balance: €0.28bn €38.25bn France €46.31bn Balance: €-8.06bn €54.12bn Germany €88.22bn Balance: €-34.09bn €34.82bn Ireland €21.37bn Balance: €13.44bn €20.36bn Italy €27.04bn Balance: €-6.67bn Netherlands €42.64bn €45.08bn Balance: €-2.43bn €18.22bn Spain €32.60bn Balance: €-14.38bn † €13.45bn Visegrad Group €24.68bn Balance: €-11.23bn † Visegrad Group = Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia Source: The Pink Book, 2014 United Kingdom Balance of Payments, Office for National Statistics of the United Kingdom 5 11 October 2016 Migration between Member States and the UK UK CITIZENS IN THE MEMBER STATE CITIZENS IN THE UK 11,000 Austria 18,000 27,000 Belgium 17,000 19,000 Denmark 26,000 185,000 France 160,000 103,000 Germany 131,000 255,000 Ireland 331,000 65,000 Italy 170,000 50,000 Netherlands 82,000 309,000 Spain 131,000 † 52,000 Visegrad Group 1,054,000 † Visegrad Group = Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia Key Source: 2014 Population by Country of Birth and Nationality Report, Office for National Statistics of the United Kingdom = 20,000 people 6 11 October 2016 Challenging negotiations ahead Heatmap of Member States’ domestic political factors impacting Brexit negotiations France Visegrad Austria Germany Spain Italy Netherlands Belgium Ireland Denmark Group † Key † Visegrad Group = Czech Republic, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia The electoral context Key electoral events Article 50 Trigger French Presidential Election Deadline First Round 2016 2017 End of March April Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Italian Referendum Dutch Parliamentary Election French Presidential Election German Parliamentary Elections 4 December 15 March Run-off September May Austrian Presidential Rerun 4 December Spanish Parliamentary Elections TBC December 7 11 October 2016 AUSTRIA Key People Trade with UK Norbert Hofer, Freedom Party (FPÖ) Presidential candidate UK exports Balance UK imports Alexander Van der Bellen, Green Party Presidential candidate €2.94bn €-2.24bn €5.18bn Upcoming elections UK-Austria migration Presidential election re-run on 4 December 2016, following ruling finding Van der Bellen’s narrow UK CITIZENS IN AUSTRIA AUSTRIANS IN THE UK win in May 2016 to be unconstitutional. Despite the role being largely symbolic in Austrian politics, 11,000 18,000 the outcome of the vote is a thermometer of populist and Eurosceptic leanings in Austria, following Hofer’s call for an Austrian referendum on EU membership. Risk of Populism/Eurospecticism? Secessionist region? Yes – Far-right Freedom Party No Analysis At the heart of the migrant route to northern European Member States, Austria has been at the forefront of the EU’s migrant crisis and subsequent populist swing in support for anti-migration politicians. In the event of a Hofer win, we can expect the mood in Austria to be more sympathetic to the UK’s migration demands. Under Van der Bellen, we can expect Austria to follow Germany’s lead more throughout negotiations. Government Negotiation Position Euroscepticism – specifically around the EU migration crisis – definesAustrian politics and its approach to UK-EU negotiations. 8 11 October 2016 BELGIUM Key People Trade with UK Prime Minister Charles Michel, Reformist Movement (MR) UK exports Balance UK imports Bart De Wever, New Flemish Alliance (NVA) Leader €19.50bn €-10.67bn €30.18bn Upcoming elections UK-Belgium migration Federal election in 2019 UK CITIZENS IN BELGIUM BELGIANS IN THE UK 27,000 17,000 Risk of Populism/Eurospecticism? Secessionist region? Yes – the NVA has benefited from populist support in Flanders, however supports Flemish Yes – Flanders has popular support for independence within the EU. independence. The Flemish national party, the NVA, controls the Flemish Government and is in coalition in the Federal Government. Analysis As a founding member of the EU and the host of its seat of power, Belgium is at Europe’s heart. It will therefore form a key member of the core EU27 Member States advocating a staunch negotiation line against dividing the EU’s four freedoms. Despite this national mind set, the powerful populist Flemish nationalist NVA party has developed a strain of Euroscepticism that advocates more national powers
Recommended publications
  • Bush Sort Victorieux Des Élections
    www.lemonde.fr 58e ANNÉE – N 17973 – 1,20 ¤ – FRANCE MÉTROPOLITAINE --- JEUDI 7 NOVEMBRE 2002 FONDATEUR : HUBERT BEUVE-MÉRY – DIRECTEUR : JEAN-MARIE COLOMBANI Le nouveau visage Bush sort victorieux des élections d’« aden » A mi-mandat présidentiel, le Parti républicain est majoritaire au Congrès après le scrutin du 5 novembre LES RÉPUBLICAINS ont rem- f LE GUIDE des sorties culturelles porté une victoire remarquable Le parti revient cette semaine dans une for- aux élections du mardi 5 novem- du président mule rénovée. En cinq rubriques – bre, donnant au président George Musiques, Cinéma, Scènes, Arts et W. Bush la majorité dans les deux a la majorité dans En famille –, aden, distribué en Ile- Chambres du Congrès. Mal élu en de-France, propose une sélection 2000, M. Bush voit son assise politi- les deux Chambres de sorties, de spectacles, les dates que renforcée par un succès électo- du Congrès des concerts à réserver dès mainte- ral qui lui donne une marge de nant, un choix de disques et de manœuvre plus grande encore f DVD. dans la stratégie qu’il entend sui- La Maison Blanche Autre innovation : notre supplé- vre face à l’Irak. Sur ce front-là éga- confortée ment, disponible en version Web, lement, il devrait enregistrer cette et sa newsletter sont accessibles semaine un succès avec le vote par gratuitement à l’adresse le Conseil de sécurité de l’ONU fIrak : l’ONU prête http://aden.lemonde.fr. d’une résolution très contraignan- Notre supplément te pour le régime de Bagdad. à voter la résolution Ce scrutin dit de mi-mandat pré- américaine sidentiel voit en général le parti du ROBERT HUE S’EN VA président perdre du terrain au Con- grès.
    [Show full text]
  • INFLUENCERS on BREXIT Who Is Most Influential on Brexit?
    INFLUENCERS ON BREXIT Who is most influential on Brexit? 1= 1= 3 4 5 Theresa MAY Angela MERKEL Nicola STURGEON Michel BARNIER Donald TUSK Chief Negotiator for the Prime Minister Federal Chancellor First Minister Commission Taskforce on Brexit President Negotiations UK Government German Government Scottish Government European Commission European Council 6 7 8 9 10 François HOLLANDE Philip HAMMOND David DAVIS Jean-Claude JUNCKER Guy VERHOFSTADT Secretary of State for Exiting the President Chancellor of the Exchequer President MEP & Lead rapporteur on Brexit European Union French Government UK Government UK Government European Commission European Parliament 11 12 13 14 15 Didier SEEUWS Enda KENNY Hilary BENN Mark RUTTE Martin SELMAYR Head of the General Secretariat of Chair, Committee on Exiting the Head of Cabinet of the President the Council Special Taskforce on Taoiseach European Union & Member of Prime Minister of the European Commission the UK Parliament, Labour Council of the EU Irish Government UK Parliament Dutch Government European Commission 16 17 18 19 20 Keir STARMER Donald TRUMP Wolfgang SCHÄUBLE Liam FOX Frans TIMMERMANS Secretary of State for Shadow Brexit Secretary US President-Elect Finance Minister First Vice-President Member of Parliament, Labour International Trade UK Parliament US Goverment German Government UK Government European Commission 21 22 23 24 25 Boris JOHNSON Nigel FARAGE Nick TIMOTHY Uwe CORSEPIUS Paul DACRE Joint Number 10 Special Adviser on Europe to Foreign Secretary MEP, Interim Leader of UKIP Chief-of-Staff,
    [Show full text]
  • Biography of Didier Seeuws
    DIDIER SEEUWS' BIOGRAPHY Didier Seeuws (55) was until February 2021 the Head of the Task Force on the UK of the General Secretariat of the Council of the European union. He was nominated by the Secretary General immediately after the UK Brexit referendum in June 2016. In this capacity, he provided advice to the Secretary General and to the President of the European Council in all matters related to EU-UK relations and was in charge of coordinating the EU Member States' positions and developing the negotiating mandates of the Council and the guidelines of the European Council for negotiations with the United Kingdom. During the Art. 50 negotiations, he chaired the ad hoc Working Party on Article 50 and, between 1 February 2020 and 31 December 2020, the Working Party on the United Kingdom. Between December 2014 and June 2016, he was the director for Transport, Telecom and Energy at the General Secretariat of the Council of the EU. In this position, he advised the EU rotating presidency mainly on legislative files related to transport, telecom and energy and provided policy advice to the President of the European Council on these matters, in particular with respect to energy files. Before becoming a EU civil servant, Didier Seeuws was a Belgian career diplomat, posted in Washington and with the EU Institutions. He did a number of ministerial cabinets and was Spokesperson of the Belgian Foreign Affairs Ministry and the Belgian Prime Minister. In his postings with the EU, he was the Belgian Deputy Permanent Representative, dealing with a wide number of files related to the EU Single Market, and was the chair of COREPER I during the Belgian Council Presidency in July-December 2010.
    [Show full text]
  • News from France 05.05 (May 04, 2005)
    http://www.ambafrance-us.org http://www.france.diplomatie.fr VOL. 05.05 MAY 4, 2005 A free triweekly review of French news & trends Online at: www.ambafrance-us.org/publi Barnier Meets With Bush, Rice,Wolfowitz in D.C. INSIDE 2 L’événement RENCH FOREIGN MINISTER Michel Barnier visited supportive of European integration (…). We believe that a united Chirac Calls for Yes Vote Washington on May 2 to talk with Dr. Condoleezza Rice, his Europe, a Europe that is strong and capable, a Europe that is clearly, on E.U. Constitution American counterpart. Barnier also met with National at its core, democratic and that has a long tradition and heritage with 3 France-Amérique Security Advisor Steve Hadley and the president-elect of the the United States, can only be good for the forward march of New U.S. Ambassador FWorld Bank, Paul Wolfowitz. While at the White House, the French progress and democracy in the world. And so we want to see the Named for France foreign minister met for 30 minutes with President George Bush. European project succeed, because a strong Europe will be good for Rice and Barnier maintain a continual dialogue over several key the forces of democracy." 4 Profil issues, including the revitalization of the Middle East peace process. While in Washington, Barnier spoke with the media, including National Parks The United States and France are in particular collaborating to help The Washington Post and CNN. During an interview with CNN's Économie / Science Lebanon recover its full sovereignty, and the two nations spearhead- Wolf Blitzer, he emphasized his desire to reinvigorate the French- 5 ed the passage of a U.N.
    [Show full text]
  • Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier?
    Politics and Governance (ISSN: 2183–2463) 2021, Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 37–47 DOI: 10.17645/pag.v9i1.3666 Article Lobbying Brexit Negotiations: Who Lobbies Michel Barnier? David Coen 1,* and Alexander Katsaitis 2 1 Department of Political Science, University College London, London, WC1H 9QH, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Government, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, WC2A 2AE, UK; E-Mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author Submitted: 16 September 2020 | Accepted: 12 December 2020 | Published: 27 January 2021 Abstract Interest groups have a vital role in international negotiations and carry the potential to influence their outcome. This article contributes to discussions surrounding Brexit and institutional change in the EU, focusing on Article 50 negotiations and stakeholder engagement. Drawing from theories on deliberative democracy and institutional legitimacy, we argue that different groups are given access to the Chief Negotiator depending on the resources they can contribute. Assessing our expectations, we inspect the entire interest group population that held meetings with Michel Barnier and his team from 2016 onwards. On the aggregate, we observe a pluralist approach. A closer inspection reveals a tightly knit circle of insiders that hold unparalleled access. To the extent that these meetings offer a glance into the future of EU lobbying, European trade and professional associations are likely to observe growing cohesion and significance. Conversely, UK private inter- ests will see their presence and influence diluted as their relevance grows smaller in Brussels. Following the trends we observe, think tanks and socioeconomic interests are likely to experience a continuous surge in their involvement in stake- holder activities.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lisbon Treaty
    The European Union’s Reform Process: The Lisbon Treaty Kristin Archick Specialist in European Affairs Derek E. Mix Analyst in European Affairs November 9, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov RS21618 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress The European Union’s Reform Process: The Lisbon Treaty Summary In December 2007, leaders of the European Union (EU) signed the Lisbon Treaty. With the completion of ratification by the Czech Republic on November 3, 2009, all 27 EU member countries have ratified the document, and it is expected to come into force on December 1, 2009. The Lisbon Treaty reforms the EU’s governing institutions and decision-making process to enable the EU to operate more effectively. The treaty grew out of the proposed “constitutional treaty” that foundered after French and Dutch voters rejected it in referendums in 2005. The Lisbon Treaty seeks to give the EU a stronger and more coherent voice with the creation of a new position, President of the European Council. This individual will chair the activities of the 27 EU heads of state or government, working to facilitate consensus and ensure policy continuity, guide the strategic direction of policy-making, and give the EU greater visibility on the world stage. Additionally, the Lisbon Treaty creates the new position of High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, a de facto EU foreign minister who would be supported by a new EU diplomatic service. The Lisbon Treaty makes changes to the EU’s internal decision-making mechanisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Top Margin 1
    CLDR/11/3 Bruxelles, le 21 janvier 2011 CALENDRIER du 24 au 30 janvier 2011 (susceptible de modifications en cours de semaine) Activités des Institutions Déplacements et visites Lundi 24 janvier Mr José Manuel Durão BARROSO receives Mr. Islam KARIMOV, President of the Republic of Uzbekistan Mr Siim KALLAS receives Mrs Catharina ELMSÄTER-SVÄRD, Swedish Minister for Infrastructure Vice-President Siim KALLAS receives Mr Uldi AUGULIS, Latvian Minister of Transport Mr Janez POTOČNIK receives Mrs Joke SCHAUVLIEGE, Belgian Minister for Environment Mr Andris PIEBALGS on official visit in Rome M. Michel BARNIER et Mme Androulla VASSILIOU reçoivent Mme Chantal JOUANNO, Secrétaire d'Etat Française aux Sports M. Michel BARNIER participe à la réunion annuelle de la Fédération Néerlandaise des Fonds de Pension (Avenue de Cortenberg 4-10) M. Michel BARNIER reçoit les représentants de la Fédération Européenne des Journalistes Ms Androulla VASSILIOU receives Mr. Yannis VARDAKASTANIS, President of European Disability Forum Ms Androulla VASSILIOU receives Ms Myriam DIOCARETZ, Secretary General of the European Writers' Council Ms Androulla VASSILIOU receives Mr Alexis GALANOS, Mayor of Ammochostos, Cyprus Mr John DALLI receives the Romanian Minister of Agriculture, Mr Valeriu TABARA Mr John DALLI delivers a speech at the opening of the World Veterinary Year, in Versailles (France) Mrs Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN receives Minister Radovan FUCHS, Croatian Minister for Science, Education and Sport Mrs Máire GEOGHEGAN-QUINN addresses the European Business Network
    [Show full text]
  • Michel Barnier
    MICHEL BARNIER French Born January 9, 1951 in La Tronche (Isère) Married - 3 children Current Responsibilities: Since 1st october 2016, Chief Negotiator - Task Force for the Preparation and Conduct of the Negotiations with the United Kingdom under Article 50 TEU Career: 2015-2016: , Special advisor on European Defence and Security Policy to the President of the European Commission 2010-2014: European Commissioner and then Vice-President in charge of Internal Market and Services 2009-2010: Member of the European Parliament, President of the French delegation of the EPP 2007-2009: Minister of Agriculture and Fisheries of France 2006-2007: Vice President of Mérieux Alliance, in charge of International Relations 2004-2005: Minister of Foreign Affairs of France 1999-2004: European Commissioner in charge of Regional Policy and the Reform of European Institutions 1997-1999: Senator of Savoie 1995-1997: Minister for European Affairs of France 1993-1995: Minister for Environment of France 1982-1999: President of the Regional Council of Savoie 1978-1995: Deputy of Savoie 1973-1999: Regional Councilor for Savoie (Bourg-Saint-Maurice District) Other activities: 2015: President of the European People's Party's group on European defense and security matters. 2006-2015: Vice-President of the European People Party Since 2006, Political Advisor of “les Républicains” 2006, Special Advisor to the President of the European Commission, José Manuel BARROSO. Presentation of a report "For A European Civil Protection Force: Europe Aid " 2005-2016:
    [Show full text]
  • Trading Places: America and Europe in the Middle East
    Trading Places: America and Europe in the Middle East Philip H. Gordon See if this story sounds familiar. A Western Great Power, long responsible for security in the Middle East, gets increasingly impatient with the hard- line position taken by nationalist leaders in Iran. Decades of historical baggage weigh heavily on both sides, and the Iranians deeply resent the way the Great Power had supported its corrupt former leaders and exer- cised influence over their internal affairs. In turn, the Great Power resents the challenge to its global leadership posed by the Tehran regime and begins to prepare plans for the use of military force. With the main protagonists refusing all direct diplomatic contact and heading toward a confrontation, the Great Power’s nervous allies dispatch negotiators to Tehran to try to defuse the dispute and offer a compromise. The Great Power denounces the compromise as appeasement and dusts off the military plans. The West is deeply split on how to handle yet another challenge in the Persian Gulf and a major showdown looms. The time and place? No, not America, Iran and Europe today, but the 1951 clash between the United Kingdom and the Mohammad Mosaddeq regime in Iran, with the United States in the role of mediator. In 1951, the issue at hand was not an incipient Iranian nuclear programme but Mosaddeq’s plan to nationalise the Iranian oil industry. The Truman administration, sympathetic to Iran’s claim that it deserved more control over its own resources, feared that Britain’s hard line would push Iran in an even more anti-Western direction and worried about an intra-Western crisis at a time when a common enemy required unity.
    [Show full text]
  • Brexit Round Up
    This report will collate all key activity from the last week in Westminster, Whitehall, the European Commission, European Parliament and leading stakeholders as it relates to the energy sector and Brexit. TABLE OF CONTENT EU: Brexit task force takes shape EU: Junker makes State of the Union speech EU: EP President says “no negotiation without notification” UK: Chairman of Global Warming Policy Foundation gives evidence to peers UK: Written answer on impact of Brexit on renewables sector UK: Opportunities for UK energy market raised in House of Commons UK: Chancellor holds round table with business UK: Scottish Government hold summit with energy sector UK: Government response to report on EU/UK environmental policy UK: MP blog on impact of Brexit on the environment UK: Speech: UK-India partnership is strong in the energy sector UK: International Trade secretary speech in Dubai EU: Brexit’s impact on EU budget EU: Leaders reflect on future of union EU: Central European countries threaten to veto Brexit deal Lookahead – September/October October Members Area by using: EU: Brexit task force takes shape On September 14, the European Commission confirmed its decision to set up a Task Force for the preparation and conduct of the Brexit negotiations under Article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union. Former French Commissioner Michel Barnier, appointed as the Commission’s Chief Negotiator on Brexit in July, will lead this Task Force which will be responsible for coordinating all strategic, operational, legal and financial issues related to the negotiations. In setting up the Task Force, the Commission also appointed Sabine Weyand, currently Deputy Director-General in the Commission's Trade Department (DG Trade), as Deputy Chief Negotiator.
    [Show full text]
  • CER Bulletin Issue 129 | December 2019/January 2020
    CER Bulletin Issue 129 | December 2019/January 2020 How should the EU ‘get Brexit done’? By Agata Gostyńska-Jakubowska How economically damaging will Brexit be? By John Springford Defence without direction By Sophia Besch How should the EU ‘get Brexit done’? by Agata Gostyńska-Jakubowska The EU and the UK might have only 11 months to conclude negotiations on their future partnership. The EU would find it easier to achieve its objectives if its negotiating structures were similar to those for the Article 50 talks. ‘Get Brexit done’ is the mantra of Boris Johnson’s The legal basis for the next phase of election campaign. If he secures a parliamentary negotiations will be Articles 207 and 218 of the majority in the December election, the UK will Treaty on the Functioning of the EU (TFEU), probably leave the EU by January 31st – the which set out the procedures for opening, Brexit deadline set by European leaders. But conducting and finalising negotiations with contrary to Johnson’s claims, leaving the EU third countries. As a first step, the European will not be the end of the Brexit story. The UK Commission will formally recommend that the will have to reach agreement with the EU on Council authorises the opening of talks with the their future relationship, or face another cliff- UK and signs off the EU negotiator’s mandate. edge when the transition period comes to an end on December 31st 2020. According to the The Commission president, Ursula von der withdrawal agreement, that is the deadline, Leyen, has decided to keep Michel Barnier as unless the EU and the UK agree by July 2020 to the EU’s chief negotiator for the second phase extend it (for up to one or two years).
    [Show full text]
  • 2010-06 'Ti Blanc__JO Plasaitb
    RÉPUBLIQUE FRANÇAISE AVIS ET RAPPORTS DU CONSEIL ÉCONOMIQUE , SOCIAL ET ENVIRONNEMENTAL AMÉLIORER L'IMAGE DE LA FRANCE 2010 Étude présentée par M. Bernard Plasait Année 2010 - N° 06 NOR : CES X10000106V Mercredi 14 avril 2010 MANDATURE 2004-2010 Séance du Bureau du 9 mars 2010 AMÉLIORER L’IMAGE DE LA FRANCE Étude du Conseil économique, social et environnemental présentée par M. Bernard Plasait, rapporteur au nom de la section du cadre de vie (Question dont le Conseil économique, social et environnemental a été saisi par décision de son bureau en date du 10 février 2009 en application de l'article 3 de l'ordonnance n° 58-1360 du 29 décembre 1958 modifiée portant loi organique relative au Conseil économique, social et environnemental) III SOMMAIRE INTRODUCTION...............................................................................................5 CHAPITRE I - L’IMAGE, UN CONCEPT À EXPLICITER ........................9 I - L’IMAGE D’UN PAYS.......................................................................9 A - QUELQUES REPÈRES CONCEPTUELS .......................................10 B - UN ENSEMBLE COMPLEXE DE CARACTÉRISTIQUES ...........11 1. Petit aperçu typologique .................................................................11 2. L’image : un objet aux fondements multiples ................................14 3. Quelques dimensions partagées......................................................16 II - IDENTITÉ ET IMAGE, ENTRE VAGUE ET ÉCUME ...............21 A - L’ÊTRE ET LE PARAÎTRE..............................................................21
    [Show full text]