DOCSLIB.ORG

UNEP-MAP and the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNEP-MAP and the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean United Nations Environment Programme Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP/MAP) UNEP-MAP and the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean. Lisbon, Portugal 20th June 2014 Virginie Hart, PhD Marine and Coastal Expert for the MedPartnership UNEP/MAP The Mediterranean Action Plan and Barcelona Convention: Adopted in 1976, revised in 1995 Four major pillars: Marine & Coastal Environment and Sustainable Development; Barcelona Convention and 7 Protocols, Mediterranean Trust Fund (MTF), Institutional set up: Contracting Parties bodies & Secretariat + Regional Activity Centers (RACs) 22 Contracting Parties Morocco, Algeria, Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Israel, Lebanon, Syria, Turkey, Cyprus, Greece, Albania, Montenegro, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Slovenia, Italy, Malta, Monaco, France, Spain and the European Union. Status of Ratifications of the Barcelona Convention and its Protocols UNEP/MAP and its Regional Activity Centers (RACs) UNEP/MAP Secretariat, Athens Greece & the Program on Pollution (MEDPOL) Priority Actions Program (PAP/RAC): Coastal Zone Management, Croatia, Split Sustainable Consumption & Production (SCP/RAC), Barcelona, Spain Plan Bleu: Sustainable Development, Sophia- Antipolis, France Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA), Tunis, Tunisia Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea (REMPEC) Major lines of actions UNEP/MAP Secretariat, Athens Greece . Monitoring implementation of the Convention and where appropriate of Protocols, and the Regional Plans . Mediterranean Strategy on Sustainable Development (MSSD) & Sustainable Development Indicators . Ecosystem Approach (EcAp) an over arching principle of UNEP/MAP work. Includes agreement on GES and related targets and long-term monitoring. In line with MSFD but extended to all non-EU countries. Coordinate preparing the State of the Mediterranean Marine and Coastal Environment . The MedPartnership project involving 10 partners . Climate Variability and ICZM project; and . SWITCH-Med project with CP/RAC, on Sustainable Consumption and production. Major Line of Activities Program on Pollution (MEDPOL), Athens, Greece . Strategic Action Plan and National Action plans (NAPs) for pollution: status of implementation, and updating priorities in the NAPs . Implement and monitor regional plans on Marine litter, BOD from WWTP & food sector, Mercury . Coordination of Pollution Monitoring and assessment (levels, trends and loads) including related EcAP indicators. Database updated. Includes Pollutant release and transfer register (PRTR); and . Web-based tools for Effluent and Emission Limit Values (ELV), Environmental Quality Objectives (EQO). Major Line of Activities Specially Protected Areas (RAC/SPA), Tunis, Tunisia . Establishment of Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs) . Maps and inventories of key habitats under the two Action Plans for the Conservation of Marine Vegetation and for the Conservation of the Coralligenous and other Calcareous Bio- concretions in the Mediterranean Sea completed . A web based Regional Ballast Water Information Exchange System developed on ships’ ballast water and invasive aquatic species issues. Assessment and supporting the creation of Marine Protected Areas (MPAs) The 7 steps - #4 11 Ecological Objectives of EcAp 1. Biological diversity is maintained or enhanced 2. Non-indigenous species introduced by human activities are at levels that do not adversely affect the ecosystem 3. Population of selected commercially exploited fish and shellfish are within biologically safe limits 4. Alterations to the components of marine food webs do not have a long-term adverse effects 5. Human-induced eutrophication is prevented The 7 steps - #4 6. Sea-floor integrity is maintained, especially in priority benthic habitats 7. Alteration of hydrographic conditions does not affect coastal and marine ecosystems 8. The natural dynamics of coastal areas are maintained and coastal ecosystems and landscapes are preserved 9. Contaminants cause no significant impact on coastal and marine ecosystems and human health 10. Marine and coastal litter do not adversely affect coastal and marine environment 11. Noise form human activities cause no significant impact on marine and coastal ecosystems Potential future uses of MyOcean MyOcean, EcAp and Monitoring of the Mediterranean . EcAp is composed of 11 Ecological Objectives, and 64 indicators. MyOcean could contribute data for the entire basin to especially compliment and fill in the gaps where data is limited. I.e. For Eutrophication: Nutrient, chlorophyll, oxygen, net primary production and phytoplankton biomass. I.e. Alteration of hydrographic conditions: Large scale changes in circulation patterns, temperature, pH, and salinity distribution; Long term changes in sea level; Impact on the circulation caused by the presence of structures; Location and extent of the habitats impacted directly by the alterations and/or the circulation changes induced by them. I.e. Pollution and Litter: Occurrence, origin (where possible), extent of significant acute pollution events (e.g. slicks from oil, oil products and hazardous substances); Trends in the amount of litter washed ashore and/or deposited on coastlines, including analysis of its composition, spatial distribution and, where possible, source Potential future uses of MyOcean Other potential uses. Inclusion of data into the Climate Variability and Change Data Platform (MedICIP) and potential analysis to be discussed; and . Other potential analysis (to be defined) such as inclusion of analysis in next Mediterranean State of Environment Report; . Tracking marine litter in the Mediterranean Sea and Coast . Future plans for ecosystem modeling, . Contribution to the work on Ecologically or Biologically Significant Marine Areas (EBSAs), and Marine Protected Areas; . tracking oil spills, and others. Potential future uses of MyOcean Requirements from MyOcean . There is a gap between MyOcean and Regional Seas Convention Secretariats who need information rather than data and may lack expertise to know how to use MyOcean data . MyOcean to meet with UNEP/MAP professionals. Can MyOcean also help in advising how data can be used, and joint agreement on products. Attend EcAp meeting to also present to countries; . MyOcean user training for key experts in MAP, as well as other Regional Seas. Could be one meeting, as other Regional Seas (HELCOM, OSPAR) are following similar approaches. Similar products could be developed for all; . Some products could be beyond scope of MyOcean, and new proposals and cooperation with institutions could be developed . Finally main priority for data and information is in the coastal areas, and therefore this gap in coastal data is an issue, where key habitats are coastal, untreated urban and industrial wastes, changes riverine fluxes, damming of rivers and reduction in sediments supplies to coast; coastal erosion etc. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals Author(s): Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, David Hyrenbach, and Tundi Agardy Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 2, pp. 91-109 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2008, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ CASE STUDIES 91 The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara,* David Hyrenbach, † and Tundi Agardy ‡ *Tethys Research Institute; Milano, Italy, email [email protected] † Duke University; Durham, NC, U.S.A., email [email protected] ‡ Sound Seas; Bethesda, MD, U.S.A., email [email protected] Source: R.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Environment Programme/Mediterranean Action
    United Nations Environment Programme/Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP/MAP) – Barcelona Convention Secretariat’s inputs to the Secretary-General report on oceans and the law of the sea SEA-LEVEL RISE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION The paragraphs below are adapted from three main relevant sources of information: - “UNEP/MAP 2019 State of the Environment and Development Report” (SoED 2019) and its Summary for Decision-Makers (UNEP/MAP, 2019) - MedECC booklet (2019): “Risks associated to climate and environmental changes in the Mediterranean region”, based on Cramer W., Guiot J., Fader M., Garrabou J., Gattuso J.-P., Iglesias A., Lange M.A., Lionello P., Llasat M.C., Paz S., Peñuelas J., Snoussi M., Toreti A., Tsimplis M.N., Xoplaki E. (2018) Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean , Nature Climate Change 8, 972-980, doi: 10.1038/s41558- 018-0299-2 - “Mediterranean Quality Status Report” (UNEP/MAP, 2017) 1. Causes and effects The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most prominent hotspots of climate and environmental change worldwide. The Mediterranean Region is warming 20% faster than the global average. Current change and future scenarios consistently point to significant and increasing risks during the coming decades. Similar to worldwide trends caused by warming and loss of glacial ice, sea level in the Mediterranean Basin has risen between 1945 and 2000 at a rate of 0.7 mm per year 1 and between 1970 and 2006 at the level of 1.1 mm per year 2. There has been a sharp increase during the last two decades as sea-level rise reached about 3 mm per year 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Guidelines for the Determination of Environmental
    The Mediterranean Guidelines for the Determination of Environmental Liability and Compensation: The Negotiations for the Instrument and the Question of Damage that Can Be Compensated Tullio Scovazzi * I. “Dead Letters in the Sea”? II. How Much Time is “as Soon as Possible”? III. The 1997 Brijuni Meeting IV. The Resumption of the Preparatory Works (2003-2007) V. The Nature and Scope of the Guidelines VI. Damage that Can Be Compensated VII. The Future Steps VIII. Concluding Remark * The author took part in the 1997 Brijuni meeting, as the representative of Italy and chairman of the meeting, as well as in the 2003 Athens meeting, the 2005 Athens meeting, the 2006 Loutraki meeting and the 2007 Athens meeting, as legal expert of the UNEP-MAP Secretariat. The opinions ex- pressed in this article are only the author’s personal ones. This article is written within the framework of a research project on the technical aspects of the international law of the sea, carried out at the University of Milano- Bicocca. A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 13, 2009, p. 183-212. © 2009 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in The Netherlands. 184 Max Planck UNYB 13 (2009) I. “Dead Letters in the Sea”? On 18 January 2008, the 15th ordinary meeting of the Contracting Par- ties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 1976; amended in 1995),1 held in Almeria, Spain, adopted the Guidelines for the Determination of Liability and Compensation for Damage resulting from Pollution of the Marine Environment in the Mediterranean Sea Area.2 In fact, the drafting of rules on liability and compensation for dam- age resulting from the pollution of the environment has proved to be a difficult task in the case of Conventions relating to regional seas.3 Sev- eral Conventions contain a pactum de contrahendo provision, according to which the Parties undertake to cooperate to develop a liability re- gime.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision IG.24/7 Strategies and Action Plans Under the Protocol
    UNEP/MED IG.24/22 Page 372 Decision IG.24/7 Strategies and Action Plans under the Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean, including the SAP BIO, the Strategy on Monk Seal, and the Action Plans concerning Marine Turtles, Cartilaginous Fishes and Marine Vegetation; Classification of Benthic Marine Habitat Types for the Mediterranean Region, and Reference List of Marine and Coastal Habitat Types in the Mediterranean The Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols at their 21st Meeting, Recalling the outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, entitled “The future we want”, endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 66/288 of 27 July 2012, in particular those paragraphs relevant to biodiversity, Recalling also General Assembly resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015, entitled “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, and acknowledging the importance of conservation, the sustainable use and management of biodiversity in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, Recalling further the United Nations Environment Assembly resolutions UNEP/EA.4/Res.10 of 15 March 2019, entitled “Innovation on biodiversity and land degradation”, Bearing in mind the international community’s commitment expressed in the Ministerial Declaration of the United Nations Environment Assembly at its fourth session to implement sustainable ecosystems
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Coverage and Effectiveness of the UNEP Convention on the Mediterranean
    Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 31, Nos 2-3, pp. 199-218, 1996 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Northern Ireland. All rights reserved PII: S0964-5691 ( 96)00040-3 0964-5691/96 $15.00 + 0-00 ELSEVIER Geographical coverage and effectiveness of the UNEP Convention on the Mediterranean Adalberto Vallega International Centre for Coastal and Ocean Policy Studies (ICCOPS), c/o The University of Genoa, Department Polis, Stradone di S. Agostino 37, 16123 Genoa, Italy A BS TRA C T The consideration of the regional scale, intended as a multi-national scale (grand espace according to the French terminology), has acquired political importance because of three factors: 1. the adoption of a regional approach by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the emerging need for a similar approach within Human Dimensions of Environmental Global Change Programme (HDEGCP), briefly called Human Dimensions Programme ( HD P ) ; 2. the recommendations by Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, 1992), to under- take sustainable development-aimed actions on all the scales, including the regional (multi-national) scale; 3. the design and implementation of the Regional Seas Programme, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), which for the first time has dealt with ocean management on the regional scale. Moving from this basis, the Mediterranean region, i.e. the space extending from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Sea of Azov, has gained special geopolitical relevance, inter alia due to the geopolitical changes after the end of the cold war, the adoption of the UNEP Mediterranean Action Plan (1976) and its implementation (1995), in association with the Barcelona Convention (1976, amended in 1995), as well as the adoption of the Action Plan for the Black Sea (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Outcome Evaluation of Barcelona Convention/ United Nations Environment Programme - Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP - MAP) Five Year Programme of Work 2010-2014
    Outcome Evaluation of Barcelona Convention/ United Nations Environment Programme - Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP - MAP) Five Year Programme of Work 2010-2014 Sarah Humphrey and Sarah Lucas Evaluation Office March 2015 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................ i Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The Evaluation................................................................................................................................... 6 3. The Programme ................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Context ............................................................................................................................................. 8 3.2. Objectives and Components ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3. Target Areas/Groups .....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Signatures and Ratifications of the Barcelona Convention for The
    Signatures and Ratifications of the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols as at 29 October 2020 (last notification received). Contracting 1976 Barcelona Convention - 1/ 1976 Dumping Protocol - 2/ 1976 Emergency Protocol - 3/ Parties Signature Ratification Acceptance of Entered Signature Ratification Acceptance of Signature Ratification Entered 1995 into force 1995 into force Amendments Amendments Albania - 30.05.90/AC 26.07.01 09.07.04 - 30.05.90/AC 26.07.01 - 30.05.90/AC 29.06.90 Algeria - 16.02.81/AC 09.06-04 09.07.04 - 16.03.81/AC - - 16.03.81/AC 15.04.81 Bosnia and - 22.10.94/SUC 19.10.2020 18.11.2020 - 22.10.94/SUC - - 22.10.94/SUC 01.03.92 Herzegovina Croatia 12.06.92/SUC 03.05.99 09.07.04 - 12.06.92/SUC 03.05.99 - 12.06.92/SUC 08.10.91 Cyprus 16.02.76 19.11.79 18.07.03 09.07.04 16.02.76 19.11.79 18.07.03 16.02.76 19.11.79 19.12.79 European 13.09.76 16.03.78/AP 12.11.99 09.07.04 13.09.76 16.03.78/AP 12.11.99 13.09.76 12.08.81/AP 11.09.81 Union Egypt 16.02.76 24.08.78/AP 11.02.00 09.07.04 16.02.76 24.08.78/AP 11.02.00 16.02.76 24.08.78/AC 23.09.78 France 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 29.03.01 09.07.04 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 29.03.01 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 10.04.78 Greece 16.02.76 03.01.79 10.03.03 09.07.04 11.02.77 03.01.79 - 16.02.76 03.01.79 02.02.79 Israel 16.02.76 03.03.78 29.09.05 29.10.05 16.02.76 01.03.84 - 16.02.76 03.03.78 02.04.78 Italy 16.02.76 03.02.79 07.09.99 09.07.04 16.02.76 03.02.79 07.09.99 16.02.76 03.02.79 05.03.79 Lebanon - 08.11.77/AC
    [Show full text]
  • Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and Its Protocols
    CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COASTAL REGION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND ITS PROTOCOLS OVERVIEW United Nations Environment Programme Coordinating Unit for the Mediterranean Action Plan Barcelona Convention Secretariat Vassileos Konstantinou 48, Athens 11635, Greece Tel.: +30 210 7273100 – Fax: +30 210 7253196 www.unepmap.org CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COASTAL REGION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND ITS PROTOCOLS OVERVIEW The Mediterranean Action Plan • Barcelona Convention and its Protocols Legal notice Copyright Credits The designations employed and the presentation This publication may be reproduced in whole or in Photography : of the material in this document do not imply the part and in any form for educational or non-profit cover page and page 8 : © Mathieu Foulquié - RAC/SPA expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part purposes without special permission from the pages 3, 7, 12, 22 : © Marko Prem of UNEP/MAP Coordinating Unit concerning the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement pages 11, 16 : © Luis Marie PREAU legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of the source is made. UNEP/MAP Coordinating page 15 : © Public institution Priroda if its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of Unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any page 17 : © RAC/SPA, University of Seville their frontiers or boundaries. publication that uses this publication as a source. page 18, 21 : © WWF Mediterranean This publication cannot be used for resale or page 19, 20 : © Panagiotis Loakeimidis for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without permission in writing for UNEP/MAP Graphic design : Coordinating Unit. © David Andrade The Mediterranean Action Plan • Barcelona Convention and its Protocols A FRAMEWORK The first ever United Nations Conference capacities to identify better options environmental problems, and that FOR COOPERATION on the Human Environment was held in for development and sound decision meaningful and lasting environmental AND POLICY Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter in Mediterranean Coastal and Marine Protected Areas How
    Joint measures to preserve natural ecosystems from marine litter in Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas MARINE LITTER IN MEDITERRANEAN COASTAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS HOW BAD IS IT? A snapshot assessment report on the amount, composition and sources of marine litter found on beaches Author: Thomais Vlachogianni (MIO-ECSDE) Contributors: This assessment was possible thanks to the contributions made by the ACT4LITTER Marine Litter Watch Month participants with regards to the implementation of the beach litter surveys. The contributors are (in alphabetical order): Aurora ZYLAJ, Carlo FRANZOSINI, Carmela GUIDONE, Christina KONTAXI, Danilo SCANNELLA, Emmanuelle JEAN, Esra OZTURK YIGIT, Federico DIPENTA, Gilles ESPOSITO, Giulia VISCONTI, Gloria GARCIA HOYO, Ignasi MATEO, Isabelle MASINSKI, Javier LLORENTE PALAO, Jeremie JOURDAN, Konstantinos KOUMPIS, Lluís ARBÓ, Loic PETENIEFF, Lorela LAZAJ, Lucille GUIHENEUF, Luisa CAMAIETTA, Marc DUMONTIER, Natalia ROUMELIOTI, Pauline CONSTANTIN, Sabina CEPUŠ, Sajmir BEQIRAJ, Stefano SIRACUSA, Stella VARELTZIDOU, Uroš ROBIČ, Vasilios GIAMOUZIS, Xavier ABRIL I FERRER, Xavier ROZEC. Cover photo: Lavezzi archipelago © Thomais Vlachogianni This document has been produced within the framework of the Interreg Med funded project entitled ACT4LITTER. The document reflects the author’s views and does not commit the donors. Citation: Vlachogianni, Th., 2019. Marine Litter in Mediterranean coastal and marine protected areas – How bad is it. A snapshot assessment report on the amounts, composition and sources of
    [Show full text]
  • Why Conservation in the Mediterranean Sea Is Necessary and Possible Now
    Marine Policy 42 (2013) 270–279 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol He who hesitates is lost: Why conservation in the Mediterranean Sea is necessary and possible now Michelle E. Portman a,n, Giuseppe Notarbartolo-di-Sciara b, Tundi Agardy c, Stelios Katsanevakis d, Hugh P. Possingham e, Giuseppe Di-Carlo f a Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel b Tethys Research Institute, Viale G.B. Gadio 2, 20121 Milano, Italy c Sound Seas, 6620 Broad Street, Bethesda, MD 20816, USA d European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Water Resources Unit, Via E. Fermi 2749, Building 46 (TP 460), Ispra (VA) I-21027, Italy e ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia f World Wide Fund for Nature (or WWF), Mediterranean Programme Office, Via Po 25/C, 00198 Rome, Italy article info abstract Article history: Although significant advancements on protecting marine biodiversity and ecosystems of the Mediterra- Received 25 January 2013 nean Sea have been made, much remains to be done to achieve the targets set by the Convention for Received in revised form Biological Diversity (and the Barcelona Convention) and ratified by the 21 Mediterranean governments. 8 March 2013 Particularly, these targets require the design and implementation of an ecologically representative Accepted 10 March 2013 network of marine protected areas that covers 10% of the Mediterranean surface by 2020. Despite the Available online 24 April 2013 many efforts to gather spatial information about threats to the Mediterranean and conservation planning Keywords: initiatives that identify sensitive areas for conservation, we are far from achieving this target.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcelona Convention: Annex II Protection for Threatened Sharks & Rays
    July 2012 Barcelona Convention: Annex II protection for threatened sharks & rays Ten species of threatened sharks and rays will now be strictly protected in the Mediterranean Sea, under the Barcelona Convention. Specifically, they will be listed under Annex II (List of Endangered and Threatened Species) of the Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity (SPA/BD). The best available data show that these species – including hammerhead sharks, shortfin makos, and tope – have undergone severe population declines (> 99%) and/or vanished from parts of the Mediterranean where they were once common (see Table 1, overleaf). All ten species were previously listed under Annex III, which requires exploitation to be regulated – yet they remained threatened by overfishing and required stronger protection. At the 17th meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention, in February 2012, the inclusion of the ten species under Annex II was approved by non-European Contracting Parties. The European Union was granted an extension of 180 days in which to determine its position. On 10 July, 2012, European Member States voted in favour of listing all ten proposed species under Annex II. Mediterranean Sea: The most dangerous place in the world for sharks & rays The Mediterranean Sea is the region of highest risk in the world for elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), with 40% of species considered threatened, compared with 17% globally.i Elasmobranchs grow slowly, mature late, and have low reproductive potential. As a result, they are highly vulnerable to overfishing and habitat loss, and populations are slow to recover once depleted. Some threatened Mediterranean sharks and rays have undergone serious declines in abundance, biomass, and/or area of distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT from the Black Sea Commission' Permanent Secretariat
    Statement Black Sea Commission STATEMENT from the Black Sea Commission’ Permanent Secretariat regarding the cooperation in fisheries between the UNEP/MAP (Barcelona Convention), the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (the Black Sea Commission or BSC) and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean of the FAO (GFCM) There is no doubt that further development of cooperation between UNEP/MAP, GFCM and BSC in relation with the imperative need to promote sustainable fisheries in the region as well as that of sharing the same objective towards ensuring the preservation of the marine environment and ecosystems of the Mediterranean and the Black Seas is on the agenda today. In the past bilateral Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) have been entered into by these organizations, as follows: Memorandum of Understanding between UNEP/MAP and GFCM signed on 14th May, 2012 in Marrakech, Morocco, during the 36th Session of the GFCM; Memorandum of Understanding between Black Sea Commission and GFCM signed on 14th May, 2012 in Marrakech, Morocco, during the 36th Session of the GFCM; Memorandum of Understanding between UNEP/MAP and Black Sea Commission signed on 11th February, 2016 in Athens, Greece during the 16th MoP to the Barcelona Convention. Recognizing the importance of implementing of the provisions in the abovementioned MoUs and addressing the current environmental challenges, given the need of carrying out joint activities in areas of common interest, enhancing the information exchange, sharing expertise and best practices, joining efforts and developing synergies, the three organizations wish to work together on joint initiatives/projects supporting the implementation of the MoUs concluded between them.
    [Show full text]