DOCSLIB.ORG

Outcome Evaluation of Barcelona Convention/ United Nations Environment Programme - Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP - MAP) Five Year Programme of Work 2010-2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Outcome Evaluation of Barcelona Convention/ United Nations Environment Programme - Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP - MAP) Five Year Programme of Work 2010-2014 Outcome Evaluation of Barcelona Convention/ United Nations Environment Programme - Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP - MAP) Five Year Programme of Work 2010-2014 Sarah Humphrey and Sarah Lucas Evaluation Office March 2015 Contents Contents ................................................................................................................................................ i Acronyms and Abbreviations .............................................................................................................. iii Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................... 1 1. Introduction ....................................................................................................................................... 5 2. The Evaluation................................................................................................................................... 6 3. The Programme ................................................................................................................................. 8 3.1. Context ............................................................................................................................................. 8 3.2. Objectives and Components ............................................................................................................ 9 3.3. Target Areas/Groups ...................................................................................................................... 10 3.4. Milestones/Key dates in Programme Design and Implementation ................................................ 10 3.5. Implementation Arrangements ....................................................................................................... 11 3.6. Programme Financing .................................................................................................................... 12 3.7. Programme Partners ...................................................................................................................... 12 3.8. Changes in Design during Implementation .................................................................................... 13 3.9. Reconstructed Theory of Change of the Programme .................................................................... 13 4. Evaluation Findings ........................................................................................................................ 15 4.1. Strategic Relevance ....................................................................................................................... 15 4.2. Achievement of Outputs ................................................................................................................. 18 4.2.1. Description of Delivery ................................................................................................... 18 4.2.2. Perceptions of Performance ........................................................................................... 29 4.2.3. Reflections on Delivery .................................................................................................. 30 4.3. Effectiveness: Attainment of Programme Objectives and Results ................................................. 31 4.3.1. Direct outcomes from reconstructed ToC ...................................................................... 33 4.3.2. Likelihood of impact based on reconstructed ToC ......................................................... 38 4.3.3. Achievement of programme goal and planned objectives ............................................. 39 4.4. Sustainability .................................................................................................................................. 40 4.5. Efficiency ........................................................................................................................................ 43 5. Factors Affecting Performance ..................................................................................................... 45 5.1. Preparation and Readiness ............................................................................................................ 45 5.2. Programme Implementation and Management .............................................................................. 46 5.2.1. Roles and Responsibilities ............................................................................................. 46 5.2.2. Management Mechanisms ............................................................................................. 47 5.3. Stakeholder Participation and Public Awareness ........................................................................... 50 5.4. Country Ownership and Driven-Ness ............................................................................................. 52 5.5. Financial Planning and Management ............................................................................................. 54 5.5.1. Budgeting, Allocations and Expenditure ........................................................................ 54 5.5.2. Financial Management ................................................................................................... 57 5.5.3. Human Resources.......................................................................................................... 57 5.6. Monitoring and Evaluation .............................................................................................................. 58 6. Conclusions and Recommendations ............................................................................................ 62 6.1. Conclusions .................................................................................................................................... 62 6.2. Lessons Learned ............................................................................................................................ 64 6.3. Recommendations ......................................................................................................................... 66 Outcome Evaluation MAP Programme of Work 2010-2014 i Annexes ............................................................................................................................................. 69 Annex 1. Response to Stakeholder Comments .................................................................................. 70 Annex 2. Evaluation Terms of Reference............................................................................................ 84 Annex 3. List of Interviewees .............................................................................................................. 96 Annex 4. Evaluation Schedule ............................................................................................................ 98 Annex 5. List of documents reviewed or consulted ............................................................................. 99 Annex 6. Results of the Questionnaire Survey to MAP and RAC Focal Points ................................ 100 Annex 7. Summary of Delivery against PoW Output Indicators and Targets ................................... 119 Annex 8. Summary of Financial Information ..................................................................................... 134 Annex 9. Brief CVs of the Consultants .............................................................................................. 138 Outcome Evaluation MAP Programme of Work 2010-2014 ii Acronyms and Abbreviations ACCOBAMS Agreement on the Conservation of Cetaceans of the Black Sea, Mediterranean Sea and contiguous Atlantic area AECID Spanish Agency for International Development Cooperation BC Barcelona Convention BOD Biological oxygen demand BP/RAC Blue Plan RAC CAMPs Coastal Area Management Programmes CBD Convention on Biological Diversity ClimVar & ICZM Integration of climate variability and change into national strategies for the implementation of the ICZM Protocol in the Mediterranean (GEF project) COP Conference of Parties CP/RAC Cleaner Production RAC (now SCP /RAC) DEPI Division of Environmental Policy Implementation (UNEP) EC European Commission EcAp Implementation of the Ecosystem Approach in the Mediterranean (EU Project) ECP Executive Coordination Panel (MAP) EEA European Environment Agency EMSA European Maritime Safety Agency EU European Union FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations FFEM French Global Environment Fund (Fonds Français pour l’Environnement Mondial) GEF Global Environment Facility GES Good Environmental Status GFCM General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (FAO) GWP-Med Global Water Partnership - Mediterranean HELCOM Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission - Helsinki Commission ICZM Integrated coastal zone management IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IHP International Hydrological Programme (UNESCO) InfoMAP UN Mediterranean knowledge platform INFO/RAC Regional Activity Centre for Information and Communication IUCN International Union for Conservation of Nature MAP Action Plan for the Protection and Development of the Mediterranean Basin MARPOL International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships MED POL Programme for the Assessment and Control of Marine Pollution in the Mediterranean MedPAN Network of Managers of Marine Protected Areas in the Mediterranean MedPartnership Strategic Partnership for the Mediterranean Sea Large Marine Ecosystem (GEF Project also referred to
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals
    Network of Conservation Educators & Practitioners The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals Author(s): Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara, David Hyrenbach, and Tundi Agardy Source: Lessons in Conservation, Vol. 2, pp. 91-109 Published by: Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners, Center for Biodiversity and Conservation, American Museum of Natural History Stable URL: ncep.amnh.org/linc/ This article is featured in Lessons in Conservation, the official journal of the Network of Conservation Educators and Practitioners (NCEP). NCEP is a collaborative project of the American Museum of Natural History’s Center for Biodiversity and Conservation (CBC) and a number of institutions and individuals around the world. Lessons in Conservation is designed to introduce NCEP teaching and learning resources (or “modules”) to a broad audience. NCEP modules are designed for undergraduate and professional level education. These modules—and many more on a variety of conservation topics—are available for free download at our website, ncep.amnh.org. To learn more about NCEP, visit our website: ncep.amnh.org. All reproduction or distribution must provide full citation of the original work and provide a copyright notice as follows: “Copyright 2008, by the authors of the material and the Center for Biodiversity and Conservation of the American Museum of Natural History. All rights reserved.” Illustrations obtained from the American Museum of Natural History’s library: images.library.amnh.org/digital/ CASE STUDIES 91 The Pelagos Sanctuary for Mediterranean Marine Mammals Giuseppe Notarbartolo di Sciara,* David Hyrenbach, † and Tundi Agardy ‡ *Tethys Research Institute; Milano, Italy, email [email protected] † Duke University; Durham, NC, U.S.A., email [email protected] ‡ Sound Seas; Bethesda, MD, U.S.A., email [email protected] Source: R.
    [Show full text]
  • United Nations Environment Programme/Mediterranean Action
    United Nations Environment Programme/Mediterranean Action Plan (UNEP/MAP) – Barcelona Convention Secretariat’s inputs to the Secretary-General report on oceans and the law of the sea SEA-LEVEL RISE IN THE MEDITERRANEAN REGION The paragraphs below are adapted from three main relevant sources of information: - “UNEP/MAP 2019 State of the Environment and Development Report” (SoED 2019) and its Summary for Decision-Makers (UNEP/MAP, 2019) - MedECC booklet (2019): “Risks associated to climate and environmental changes in the Mediterranean region”, based on Cramer W., Guiot J., Fader M., Garrabou J., Gattuso J.-P., Iglesias A., Lange M.A., Lionello P., Llasat M.C., Paz S., Peñuelas J., Snoussi M., Toreti A., Tsimplis M.N., Xoplaki E. (2018) Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean , Nature Climate Change 8, 972-980, doi: 10.1038/s41558- 018-0299-2 - “Mediterranean Quality Status Report” (UNEP/MAP, 2017) 1. Causes and effects The Mediterranean Basin is one of the most prominent hotspots of climate and environmental change worldwide. The Mediterranean Region is warming 20% faster than the global average. Current change and future scenarios consistently point to significant and increasing risks during the coming decades. Similar to worldwide trends caused by warming and loss of glacial ice, sea level in the Mediterranean Basin has risen between 1945 and 2000 at a rate of 0.7 mm per year 1 and between 1970 and 2006 at the level of 1.1 mm per year 2. There has been a sharp increase during the last two decades as sea-level rise reached about 3 mm per year 3.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mediterranean Guidelines for the Determination of Environmental
    The Mediterranean Guidelines for the Determination of Environmental Liability and Compensation: The Negotiations for the Instrument and the Question of Damage that Can Be Compensated Tullio Scovazzi * I. “Dead Letters in the Sea”? II. How Much Time is “as Soon as Possible”? III. The 1997 Brijuni Meeting IV. The Resumption of the Preparatory Works (2003-2007) V. The Nature and Scope of the Guidelines VI. Damage that Can Be Compensated VII. The Future Steps VIII. Concluding Remark * The author took part in the 1997 Brijuni meeting, as the representative of Italy and chairman of the meeting, as well as in the 2003 Athens meeting, the 2005 Athens meeting, the 2006 Loutraki meeting and the 2007 Athens meeting, as legal expert of the UNEP-MAP Secretariat. The opinions ex- pressed in this article are only the author’s personal ones. This article is written within the framework of a research project on the technical aspects of the international law of the sea, carried out at the University of Milano- Bicocca. A. von Bogdandy and R. Wolfrum, (eds.), Max Planck Yearbook of United Nations Law, Volume 13, 2009, p. 183-212. © 2009 Koninklijke Brill N.V. Printed in The Netherlands. 184 Max Planck UNYB 13 (2009) I. “Dead Letters in the Sea”? On 18 January 2008, the 15th ordinary meeting of the Contracting Par- ties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 1976; amended in 1995),1 held in Almeria, Spain, adopted the Guidelines for the Determination of Liability and Compensation for Damage resulting from Pollution of the Marine Environment in the Mediterranean Sea Area.2 In fact, the drafting of rules on liability and compensation for dam- age resulting from the pollution of the environment has proved to be a difficult task in the case of Conventions relating to regional seas.3 Sev- eral Conventions contain a pactum de contrahendo provision, according to which the Parties undertake to cooperate to develop a liability re- gime.
    [Show full text]
  • Decision IG.24/7 Strategies and Action Plans Under the Protocol
    UNEP/MED IG.24/22 Page 372 Decision IG.24/7 Strategies and Action Plans under the Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity in the Mediterranean, including the SAP BIO, the Strategy on Monk Seal, and the Action Plans concerning Marine Turtles, Cartilaginous Fishes and Marine Vegetation; Classification of Benthic Marine Habitat Types for the Mediterranean Region, and Reference List of Marine and Coastal Habitat Types in the Mediterranean The Contracting Parties to the Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols at their 21st Meeting, Recalling the outcome document of the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development, entitled “The future we want”, endorsed by the General Assembly in its resolution 66/288 of 27 July 2012, in particular those paragraphs relevant to biodiversity, Recalling also General Assembly resolution 70/1 of 25 September 2015, entitled “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development”, and acknowledging the importance of conservation, the sustainable use and management of biodiversity in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals, Recalling further the United Nations Environment Assembly resolutions UNEP/EA.4/Res.10 of 15 March 2019, entitled “Innovation on biodiversity and land degradation”, Bearing in mind the international community’s commitment expressed in the Ministerial Declaration of the United Nations Environment Assembly at its fourth session to implement sustainable ecosystems
    [Show full text]
  • Geographical Coverage and Effectiveness of the UNEP Convention on the Mediterranean
    Ocean & Coastal Management, Vol. 31, Nos 2-3, pp. 199-218, 1996 Copyright © 1996 Elsevier Science Ltd Printed in Northern Ireland. All rights reserved PII: S0964-5691 ( 96)00040-3 0964-5691/96 $15.00 + 0-00 ELSEVIER Geographical coverage and effectiveness of the UNEP Convention on the Mediterranean Adalberto Vallega International Centre for Coastal and Ocean Policy Studies (ICCOPS), c/o The University of Genoa, Department Polis, Stradone di S. Agostino 37, 16123 Genoa, Italy A BS TRA C T The consideration of the regional scale, intended as a multi-national scale (grand espace according to the French terminology), has acquired political importance because of three factors: 1. the adoption of a regional approach by the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) and the emerging need for a similar approach within Human Dimensions of Environmental Global Change Programme (HDEGCP), briefly called Human Dimensions Programme ( HD P ) ; 2. the recommendations by Agenda 21, United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED, 1992), to under- take sustainable development-aimed actions on all the scales, including the regional (multi-national) scale; 3. the design and implementation of the Regional Seas Programme, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), which for the first time has dealt with ocean management on the regional scale. Moving from this basis, the Mediterranean region, i.e. the space extending from the Straits of Gibraltar to the Sea of Azov, has gained special geopolitical relevance, inter alia due to the geopolitical changes after the end of the cold war, the adoption of the UNEP Mediterranean Action Plan (1976) and its implementation (1995), in association with the Barcelona Convention (1976, amended in 1995), as well as the adoption of the Action Plan for the Black Sea (1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Signatures and Ratifications of the Barcelona Convention for The
    Signatures and Ratifications of the Barcelona Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and its Protocols as at 29 October 2020 (last notification received). Contracting 1976 Barcelona Convention - 1/ 1976 Dumping Protocol - 2/ 1976 Emergency Protocol - 3/ Parties Signature Ratification Acceptance of Entered Signature Ratification Acceptance of Signature Ratification Entered 1995 into force 1995 into force Amendments Amendments Albania - 30.05.90/AC 26.07.01 09.07.04 - 30.05.90/AC 26.07.01 - 30.05.90/AC 29.06.90 Algeria - 16.02.81/AC 09.06-04 09.07.04 - 16.03.81/AC - - 16.03.81/AC 15.04.81 Bosnia and - 22.10.94/SUC 19.10.2020 18.11.2020 - 22.10.94/SUC - - 22.10.94/SUC 01.03.92 Herzegovina Croatia 12.06.92/SUC 03.05.99 09.07.04 - 12.06.92/SUC 03.05.99 - 12.06.92/SUC 08.10.91 Cyprus 16.02.76 19.11.79 18.07.03 09.07.04 16.02.76 19.11.79 18.07.03 16.02.76 19.11.79 19.12.79 European 13.09.76 16.03.78/AP 12.11.99 09.07.04 13.09.76 16.03.78/AP 12.11.99 13.09.76 12.08.81/AP 11.09.81 Union Egypt 16.02.76 24.08.78/AP 11.02.00 09.07.04 16.02.76 24.08.78/AP 11.02.00 16.02.76 24.08.78/AC 23.09.78 France 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 29.03.01 09.07.04 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 29.03.01 16.02.76 11.03.78/AP 10.04.78 Greece 16.02.76 03.01.79 10.03.03 09.07.04 11.02.77 03.01.79 - 16.02.76 03.01.79 02.02.79 Israel 16.02.76 03.03.78 29.09.05 29.10.05 16.02.76 01.03.84 - 16.02.76 03.03.78 02.04.78 Italy 16.02.76 03.02.79 07.09.99 09.07.04 16.02.76 03.02.79 07.09.99 16.02.76 03.02.79 05.03.79 Lebanon - 08.11.77/AC
    [Show full text]
  • Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean and Its Protocols
    CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COASTAL REGION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND ITS PROTOCOLS OVERVIEW United Nations Environment Programme Coordinating Unit for the Mediterranean Action Plan Barcelona Convention Secretariat Vassileos Konstantinou 48, Athens 11635, Greece Tel.: +30 210 7273100 – Fax: +30 210 7253196 www.unepmap.org CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE MARINE ENVIRONMENT AND THE COASTAL REGION OF THE MEDITERRANEAN AND ITS PROTOCOLS OVERVIEW The Mediterranean Action Plan • Barcelona Convention and its Protocols Legal notice Copyright Credits The designations employed and the presentation This publication may be reproduced in whole or in Photography : of the material in this document do not imply the part and in any form for educational or non-profit cover page and page 8 : © Mathieu Foulquié - RAC/SPA expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part purposes without special permission from the pages 3, 7, 12, 22 : © Marko Prem of UNEP/MAP Coordinating Unit concerning the copyright holder, provided acknowledgement pages 11, 16 : © Luis Marie PREAU legal status of any State, Territory, city or area, or of the source is made. UNEP/MAP Coordinating page 15 : © Public institution Priroda if its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of Unit would appreciate receiving a copy of any page 17 : © RAC/SPA, University of Seville their frontiers or boundaries. publication that uses this publication as a source. page 18, 21 : © WWF Mediterranean This publication cannot be used for resale or page 19, 20 : © Panagiotis Loakeimidis for any other commercial purpose whatsoever without permission in writing for UNEP/MAP Graphic design : Coordinating Unit. © David Andrade The Mediterranean Action Plan • Barcelona Convention and its Protocols A FRAMEWORK The first ever United Nations Conference capacities to identify better options environmental problems, and that FOR COOPERATION on the Human Environment was held in for development and sound decision meaningful and lasting environmental AND POLICY Stockholm, Sweden, in 1972.
    [Show full text]
  • Marine Litter in Mediterranean Coastal and Marine Protected Areas How
    Joint measures to preserve natural ecosystems from marine litter in Mediterranean Marine Protected Areas MARINE LITTER IN MEDITERRANEAN COASTAL AND MARINE PROTECTED AREAS HOW BAD IS IT? A snapshot assessment report on the amount, composition and sources of marine litter found on beaches Author: Thomais Vlachogianni (MIO-ECSDE) Contributors: This assessment was possible thanks to the contributions made by the ACT4LITTER Marine Litter Watch Month participants with regards to the implementation of the beach litter surveys. The contributors are (in alphabetical order): Aurora ZYLAJ, Carlo FRANZOSINI, Carmela GUIDONE, Christina KONTAXI, Danilo SCANNELLA, Emmanuelle JEAN, Esra OZTURK YIGIT, Federico DIPENTA, Gilles ESPOSITO, Giulia VISCONTI, Gloria GARCIA HOYO, Ignasi MATEO, Isabelle MASINSKI, Javier LLORENTE PALAO, Jeremie JOURDAN, Konstantinos KOUMPIS, Lluís ARBÓ, Loic PETENIEFF, Lorela LAZAJ, Lucille GUIHENEUF, Luisa CAMAIETTA, Marc DUMONTIER, Natalia ROUMELIOTI, Pauline CONSTANTIN, Sabina CEPUŠ, Sajmir BEQIRAJ, Stefano SIRACUSA, Stella VARELTZIDOU, Uroš ROBIČ, Vasilios GIAMOUZIS, Xavier ABRIL I FERRER, Xavier ROZEC. Cover photo: Lavezzi archipelago © Thomais Vlachogianni This document has been produced within the framework of the Interreg Med funded project entitled ACT4LITTER. The document reflects the author’s views and does not commit the donors. Citation: Vlachogianni, Th., 2019. Marine Litter in Mediterranean coastal and marine protected areas – How bad is it. A snapshot assessment report on the amounts, composition and sources of
    [Show full text]
  • Why Conservation in the Mediterranean Sea Is Necessary and Possible Now
    Marine Policy 42 (2013) 270–279 Contents lists available at SciVerse ScienceDirect Marine Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/marpol He who hesitates is lost: Why conservation in the Mediterranean Sea is necessary and possible now Michelle E. Portman a,n, Giuseppe Notarbartolo-di-Sciara b, Tundi Agardy c, Stelios Katsanevakis d, Hugh P. Possingham e, Giuseppe Di-Carlo f a Technion — Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel b Tethys Research Institute, Viale G.B. Gadio 2, 20121 Milano, Italy c Sound Seas, 6620 Broad Street, Bethesda, MD 20816, USA d European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Water Resources Unit, Via E. Fermi 2749, Building 46 (TP 460), Ispra (VA) I-21027, Italy e ARC Centre of Excellence for Environmental Decisions, School of Biological Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4072, Australia f World Wide Fund for Nature (or WWF), Mediterranean Programme Office, Via Po 25/C, 00198 Rome, Italy article info abstract Article history: Although significant advancements on protecting marine biodiversity and ecosystems of the Mediterra- Received 25 January 2013 nean Sea have been made, much remains to be done to achieve the targets set by the Convention for Received in revised form Biological Diversity (and the Barcelona Convention) and ratified by the 21 Mediterranean governments. 8 March 2013 Particularly, these targets require the design and implementation of an ecologically representative Accepted 10 March 2013 network of marine protected areas that covers 10% of the Mediterranean surface by 2020. Despite the Available online 24 April 2013 many efforts to gather spatial information about threats to the Mediterranean and conservation planning Keywords: initiatives that identify sensitive areas for conservation, we are far from achieving this target.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcelona Convention: Annex II Protection for Threatened Sharks & Rays
    July 2012 Barcelona Convention: Annex II protection for threatened sharks & rays Ten species of threatened sharks and rays will now be strictly protected in the Mediterranean Sea, under the Barcelona Convention. Specifically, they will be listed under Annex II (List of Endangered and Threatened Species) of the Protocol concerning Specially Protected Areas and Biological Diversity (SPA/BD). The best available data show that these species – including hammerhead sharks, shortfin makos, and tope – have undergone severe population declines (> 99%) and/or vanished from parts of the Mediterranean where they were once common (see Table 1, overleaf). All ten species were previously listed under Annex III, which requires exploitation to be regulated – yet they remained threatened by overfishing and required stronger protection. At the 17th meeting of the Contracting Parties to the Barcelona Convention, in February 2012, the inclusion of the ten species under Annex II was approved by non-European Contracting Parties. The European Union was granted an extension of 180 days in which to determine its position. On 10 July, 2012, European Member States voted in favour of listing all ten proposed species under Annex II. Mediterranean Sea: The most dangerous place in the world for sharks & rays The Mediterranean Sea is the region of highest risk in the world for elasmobranchs (sharks and rays), with 40% of species considered threatened, compared with 17% globally.i Elasmobranchs grow slowly, mature late, and have low reproductive potential. As a result, they are highly vulnerable to overfishing and habitat loss, and populations are slow to recover once depleted. Some threatened Mediterranean sharks and rays have undergone serious declines in abundance, biomass, and/or area of distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • STATEMENT from the Black Sea Commission' Permanent Secretariat
    Statement Black Sea Commission STATEMENT from the Black Sea Commission’ Permanent Secretariat regarding the cooperation in fisheries between the UNEP/MAP (Barcelona Convention), the Commission on the Protection of the Black Sea Against Pollution (the Black Sea Commission or BSC) and the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean of the FAO (GFCM) There is no doubt that further development of cooperation between UNEP/MAP, GFCM and BSC in relation with the imperative need to promote sustainable fisheries in the region as well as that of sharing the same objective towards ensuring the preservation of the marine environment and ecosystems of the Mediterranean and the Black Seas is on the agenda today. In the past bilateral Memoranda of Understanding (MoU) have been entered into by these organizations, as follows: Memorandum of Understanding between UNEP/MAP and GFCM signed on 14th May, 2012 in Marrakech, Morocco, during the 36th Session of the GFCM; Memorandum of Understanding between Black Sea Commission and GFCM signed on 14th May, 2012 in Marrakech, Morocco, during the 36th Session of the GFCM; Memorandum of Understanding between UNEP/MAP and Black Sea Commission signed on 11th February, 2016 in Athens, Greece during the 16th MoP to the Barcelona Convention. Recognizing the importance of implementing of the provisions in the abovementioned MoUs and addressing the current environmental challenges, given the need of carrying out joint activities in areas of common interest, enhancing the information exchange, sharing expertise and best practices, joining efforts and developing synergies, the three organizations wish to work together on joint initiatives/projects supporting the implementation of the MoUs concluded between them.
    [Show full text]
  • Barcelona Convention
    conventionprotocolsBODY 24/10/2005 10:53 Page 1 Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean The Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against Pollution (the Barcelona Convention) was adopted on 16 February 1976 by the Conference of Plenipotentiaries of the Coastal States of the Mediterranean Region for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea, held in Barcelona. The Convention entered into force on 12 February 1978. The original Convention has been modified by amendments adopted on 10 June 1995 by the Conference of Plenipotentiaries on the Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea against Pollution and its Protocols, held in Barcelona on 9 and 10 June 1995 (UNEP(OCA)/MED IG.6/7). The amended Convention, recorded as “Convention for the Protection of the Marine Environment and the Coastal Region of the Mediterranean” has entered into force on 9 July 2004. The Contracting Parties, Conscious of the economic, social, health and cultural value of the marine envi- ronment of the Mediterranean Sea Area, Fully aware of their responsibility to preserve and sustainably develop this com- mon heritage for the benefit and enjoyment of present and future generations, Recognizing the threat posed by pollution to the marine environment, its ecolog- ical equilibrium, resources and legitimate uses, Mindful of the special hydrographic and ecological characteristics of the Mediterranean Sea Area and its particular vulnerability to pollution, Noting that existing international
    [Show full text]