Parasites of Eskimos at Igloolik and Hall Beach, Northwest Territories

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Parasites of Eskimos at Igloolik and Hall Beach, Northwest Territories ft I 306 Zoonotic and infectious diseases Parasites of Eskimos at Igloolik and Hall Beach, Northwest Territories R.S. FREEMAN andJ. JAMIESON There are relatively few reports that discuss the incidence of human intestinal parasites in the people of the near­ Arctic. There have been a few surveys along the coast of Alaska, others from Canada, mainly below the Arctic Circle (3,4,10) and at least one survey from the west coast of Greenland (2). All describe relatively high, albeit variable, incidences of intestinal parasites, including protozoans and usually some metazoan eggs. As Babbott et al. stated for Greenland (2), the level of parasitism" .•• was comparable to many tropical regions." There are a few studies on the biology of metazoan parasites of natives, mostly from Alaska (11, 12). The present report adds to scanty knowledge of the incidence of human intestinal parasites in the far north of eastern Canada (4,5,9) particularly Igloolik and Hall Beach, NWT (3). Particular objectives of the study were to estab­ lish the identity and shed light on the biology of Diphyl­ lobothxium sp. (3), and to determine whether D. latum occurs in the eastern Canadian Arctic (1,5,9,ll,16). MATERIALS AND METHODS The senior author collected faecal specimens on two short trips in May-June 1970 and August 1971. Local workers also collected faecal specimens at Hall Beach and Igloolik in September-October 1970; these were treated with formalin and sent to Toronto for examination. A total of 352 faecal samples, from more than 300 Eskimos out of a total native population of just over 700, were examined. In May-June 1970, 171 pinworrn swabs were also collected. A modified Ritchie-Formalin-Ether centrifugation con­ centration technique (RFE) (13) was used on all specimens. Some specimens were also stained with Scholton's modified iron haernatoxylin (SIH) procedure (15). One of us (J.J.) spent May-September 1971 collecting helminth parasites from Arctic char and a few other spe­ cies of fist from nine areas of the upper Foxe Basin, as well as observing the biology of Eskimos in summer camp. Two types of tapeworm plerocercoids were removed from Parasites of Eskimos 307 Arctic char (Salvelinus alpinus (L.)) and a second worm tentatively identified as Diphyllobothrium sp.; these were fed to five Caucasian volunteers and two dogs. Two humans and one dog became infected with one type. Four adult worms were purged from the human volunteers using magnesium sulphate, atabrine, sodium bicarbonate, and phenobarbital as recollllllended by Rausch et al. (12). The worms were fixed in hot or cold 10 per cent formalin, stained, and either shaved, sectioned, or mounted in toto for study. RESULTS Results are summarized in Table 1. Because of the low inci­ dence of pinworms in May-June 1970, this aspect of the study was not continued in the autumn of 1970 or in 1971. The data for May-June 1970 and August 1971 are comparatively consis­ tent, and are based on field study of RFE concentrates and additional SIH specimens prepared on return to the labora­ tory in 1971. The apparent discrepancies between these sam­ ples and those collected in September-October 1970 may re­ sult from both smaller sample sizes and from the use of for­ malin-treated samples. The latter provide less consistent information than results obtained with unfixed faecal sam­ ples. The higher incidence of parasites found in August 1971 undoubtedly reflects both a true increase in the inci­ dence of helminth ova, and the fact that several protozoa! infections, overlooked in RFE procedures, were detected with the SIH technique. Two types of plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium spp., the stage infective to the homiothermic vertebrate host, were conunonly found on and within various viscera from Arctic char. One type was large, characteristically wrinkled, or even segmented (Figure 1), and was subsequently identified as Diphyllobothrium dendriticum (Nitsch); this type was less ubiquitous and less cormnon in absolute numbers than the second type. The latter was small, characteristically "smooth" (Figure 2) and found in all areas where Arctic char were collected, being at least four times more conunon than D. dendriticum. The results of limited feedings of both types of plerocercoids to Caucasian volunteers and dogs (Table 2) were monitored with the RFE technique, be­ ginning seven days after ingestion of plerocercoids and continuing weekly for seven weeks if eggs were not found. Four DiphyllobothriuD dendriticum were purged from the t'..:o ir,fected huraans ( 8) , but one dog, although passing eggs TABLE 1 Intestinal parasites of Eskimos in Hall Beach and Igloolik, NWT 1970 1970 1949* 1971 May-June Sept.-Oct. August August Igloolik Igloolik Hall Beach Igloolik Hall Beach Igloolik Pinwonn swabs (examine4"' infected) 60/33 77/5 94/2 Faecal samples (examined/% infected) 97/47 78/47** 73/48** 46/33** 32/59** 123/53** Entamoeba coli (% infected) 8 30 38 17 38 29 Entamoeba histolytica (% infected) 0 0 0 0 3 0 Endolimax nana ( % infected) 4 12 6 9 22 24 Giardia lamblia (% infected) 2 17 29 9 28 11 Other flagellates (% infected) 0 0 0 0 0 2 Diphyllobothrium sp. (% infected) 33 0 0 9 0 2 Diphyllobothrioid eggs (% infected) 0 0 0 0 0 6 Fluke (?) eggs (% infected) 0 0 0 0 0 2 Enterobius vermicularis (% infected) ? 0 0 0 0 2 Unidentified eggs (?) (% infected) 0 0 0 0 0 2 * From M. Brown, et al., Can. J. Public Health 41: 508-12 (1950). ** Some multiple infections. TABLE 2 Results of feeding plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium spp. to humans and dogs Number of Days until plerocercoids Days until purge (p) or Worms fed eggs seen autopsy (a) obtained Diphyllobothrium dendriticum Caucasian No. 1 3 11 72? (p) 3* (second feeding) 6 ? 14? (p) Caucasian No. 1 8 None seen not done 0 Caucasian No. 2 6 10 32 (p) l Dog No. 1 6 None seen 24 (a) 0 Dog No. 2 6 7 24 (a) 0 Diphyllobothrium sp. (smooth) Caucasian No. 3 6 None seen Not done 0 Caucasian No. 4 2 None seen Not done 0 Caucasian No. 5 3 None seen Not done 0 * Nnt- \cl"'lnwn if nr1.\11t- worms 14 nr 72 rletv~ old_ Parasites in Eskimos 309 Figure 1 Plerocercoid of Diphyllobothrium dendriticum, anterior half on the left; notice distinct segmentation (scale = 5 mm) Figure 2 Plerocercoid of Diphyllobothrium sp.; notice much smaller size, smooth outline of body, and lack of segmenta­ tion (scale = 1 mm) 310 Zoonotic and infectious diseases within seven days, showed no parasites when autopsied 17 days later. The smaller plerocercoids did not establish themselves in man (Table 2). DISCUSSION Changes in the incidence of parasites in 1970-71 compared with 1949 (3) are presumably conservative estimates, since in most instances the more recent data are based on single samples. Pinworms (E. vermicularis) are down markedly, as are head lice according to the nurses, although we did not examine for them. Interestingly, the over-all incidence of intestinal parasitism has not changed -nearly half the Es­ kimos still harbour one or more types of parasites - but the relative incidence of various species of parasites has changed. Protozoans have increased at least fourfold, while worm infections have declined to a slightly smaller extent. Giardia lamblia, a mild pathogen, is much more abundant than formerly. The single infection with Entamoeba histoly­ tica probably was acquired when this individual was re­ ceiving treatment for another condition in southern Canada. Conceivably, Dientamoeba fragilis were overlooked in the SIH preparations made in 1971. The identity of the cestodes is intriguing. Towards the end of the last collecting trip, an iodine-stained slide dried by accident, and it was then discovered that at least two types of eggs were present in the stools. One, with a typical smooth shell, can be associated with Diphyllobo­ thrium spp. of fresh-water origin (7). The other, with a deeply pitted scrobiculate shell, is typically associated with various diphyllobothrioid cestodes of marine origin (7). Whether the latter were present in 1949 is unknown. A single attempt to purge a patient passing scrobiculate eggs was unsuccessful. Successfully infecting man and dog with plerocercoids from Arctic char (Table 2) and producing non­ scrobiculate eggs (N = 350, range 48-72~x = 63.3A)(8) suggests that the smooth-shelled eggs of the same size range obtained from the Eskimos are Diphyllobothrium den­ driticum. This is almost certainly a zoonosis, maintained elsewhere in the world by gulls. The species becomes pa­ tent in less than two weeks in man and is relatively small and short-lived; in contrast, D. latum requires four weeks or more to become patent, may live for several years, and is quite large (8, 11}. Since no eggs were found in the stools in the spring, this further supports the assumption that the smooth-shelled eggs found later in the summer are Parasites in Eskimos 311 Figure 3 Photograph of eviscerated Arctic char with plero­ cercoids, indicated by pencil, encysted on lateral peri­ toneum. the short-lived D. dendriticum. This species is probably of little consequence to health. The Eskimos continue to eat uncooked, unfrozen Arctic char, although probably less than was fonnerly the case. They eat only the flesh and occasionally a ripe roe. From conversation and observation it is apparent that the Eski­ mos are unaware of the presence of the plerocercoids. How are plerocercoids of Diphyllobothrium sp. ingested, since they are relatively rare in the roe (<4 per cent) and do not occur in the flesh, being mainly on and in other vis­ cera (~25 per cent) or attached to the lateral peritoneum (~10 per cent) (8)? Quite likely, a few plerocercoids from roe are ingested, but probably most come from those attached to the lateral peritoneum (Figure 3) • Often the fish are filleted and the flesh separated from the skeleton.
Recommended publications
  • Transits of the Northwest Passage to End of the 2020 Navigation Season Atlantic Ocean ↔ Arctic Ocean ↔ Pacific Ocean
    TRANSITS OF THE NORTHWEST PASSAGE TO END OF THE 2020 NAVIGATION SEASON ATLANTIC OCEAN ↔ ARCTIC OCEAN ↔ PACIFIC OCEAN R. K. Headland and colleagues 7 April 2021 Scott Polar Research Institute, University of Cambridge, Lensfield Road, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 1ER. <[email protected]> The earliest traverse of the Northwest Passage was completed in 1853 starting in the Pacific Ocean to reach the Atlantic Oceam, but used sledges over the sea ice of the central part of Parry Channel. Subsequently the following 319 complete maritime transits of the Northwest Passage have been made to the end of the 2020 navigation season, before winter began and the passage froze. These transits proceed to or from the Atlantic Ocean (Labrador Sea) in or out of the eastern approaches to the Canadian Arctic archipelago (Lancaster Sound or Foxe Basin) then the western approaches (McClure Strait or Amundsen Gulf), across the Beaufort Sea and Chukchi Sea of the Arctic Ocean, through the Bering Strait, from or to the Bering Sea of the Pacific Ocean. The Arctic Circle is crossed near the beginning and the end of all transits except those to or from the central or northern coast of west Greenland. The routes and directions are indicated. Details of submarine transits are not included because only two have been reported (1960 USS Sea Dragon, Capt. George Peabody Steele, westbound on route 1 and 1962 USS Skate, Capt. Joseph Lawrence Skoog, eastbound on route 1). Seven routes have been used for transits of the Northwest Passage with some minor variations (for example through Pond Inlet and Navy Board Inlet) and two composite courses in summers when ice was minimal (marked ‘cp’).
    [Show full text]
  • Canada's Arctic Marine Atlas
    Lincoln Sea Hall Basin MARINE ATLAS ARCTIC CANADA’S GREENLAND Ellesmere Island Kane Basin Nares Strait N nd ansen Sou s d Axel n Sve Heiberg rdr a up Island l Ch ann North CANADA’S s el I Pea Water ry Ch a h nnel Massey t Sou Baffin e Amund nd ISR Boundary b Ringnes Bay Ellef Norwegian Coburg Island Grise Fiord a Ringnes Bay Island ARCTIC MARINE z Island EEZ Boundary Prince i Borden ARCTIC l Island Gustaf E Adolf Sea Maclea Jones n Str OCEAN n ait Sound ATLANTIC e Mackenzie Pe Ball nn antyn King Island y S e trait e S u trait it Devon Wel ATLAS Stra OCEAN Q Prince l Island Clyde River Queens in Bylot Patrick Hazen Byam gt Channel o Island Martin n Island Ch tr. Channel an Pond Inlet S Bathurst nel Qikiqtarjuaq liam A Island Eclipse ust Lancaster Sound in Cornwallis Sound Hecla Ch Fitzwil Island and an Griper nel ait Bay r Resolute t Melville Barrow Strait Arctic Bay S et P l Island r i Kel l n e c n e n Somerset Pangnirtung EEZ Boundary a R M'Clure Strait h Island e C g Baffin Island Brodeur y e r r n Peninsula t a P I Cumberland n Peel Sound l e Sound Viscount Stefansson t Melville Island Sound Prince Labrador of Wales Igloolik Prince Sea it Island Charles ra Hadley Bay Banks St s Island le a Island W Hall Beach f Beaufort o M'Clintock Gulf of Iqaluit e c n Frobisher Bay i Channel Resolution r Boothia Boothia Sea P Island Sachs Franklin Peninsula Committee Foxe Harbour Strait Bay Melville Peninsula Basin Kimmirut Taloyoak N UNAT Minto Inlet Victoria SIA VUT Makkovik Ulukhaktok Kugaaruk Foxe Island Hopedale Liverpool Amundsen Victoria King
    [Show full text]
  • Atlantic Walrus Summary • Between 1997 and 2001, Hunters
    Fisheries Pêches and Oceans et Océans DFO Science Central and Arctic Region Stock Status Report E5-17, 18, 19, 20 (2002) Atlantic Walrus Summary • Between 1997 and 2001, hunters reported the average annual kill (landed) for each stock as: South and East Hudson Bay – 4/year; Hudson Bay/Davis Strait – 48/year; Foxe Basin – 180/year; Baffin Bay – 9/year. Records are incomplete, and are not corrected for hunting losses. Sequential five year harvest averages for all stocks have declined over the Background last 20 years. Hunters attribute this to Atlantic walrus (Odobenus rosmarus rosmarus) have been divided into two a decreased use of dog teams and/or populations, one east of Greenland and one in other factors. western Greenland and Canada. They occur • The few existing studies of struck- throughout the eastern Canadian Arctic. Four and-lost rates estimate rates of 30- stocks have been identified in Canada (Fig. 1): South and East Hudson Bay (SEHB), Hudson 32%. Struck-and-lost rates likely vary Bay-Davis Strait (HBDS), Foxe Basin (FB), and with season, weather, location, hunter Baffin Bay (BB). The Maritime stock that once experience, and animal behaviour. extended south to Nova Scotia is considered to Hunters believe loss rates are low have been extirpated. (~5%). In Canada, the main period of commercial • harvesting started in the late 1800s and Scientific evidence for stock identity continued well into the 1900s (Reeves 1978). is based on distribution and genetic Commercial hunting of walrus was banned in and lead isotope data; four distinct 1928 by the Walrus Protection Regulations stocks have been identified: South (Richard and Campbell 1988).
    [Show full text]
  • Hudson Bay and Foxe Basins Project: Introduction to the Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals, GEM–Energy Initiative, Northeastern Manitoba (Parts of NTS 54) by M.P.B
    GS-16 Hudson Bay and Foxe Basins Project: introduction to the Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals, GEM–Energy initiative, northeastern Manitoba (parts of NTS 54) by M.P.B. Nicolas and D. Lavoie1 Nicolas, M.P.B. and Lavoie, D. 2009: Hudson Bay and Foxe Basins Project: introduction to the Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals, GEM–Energy initiative, northeastern Manitoba (parts of NTS 54); in Report of Activities 2009, Manitoba Innovation, Energy and Mines, Manitoba Geological Survey, p. 160–164. Summary project, a re-examination and The Hudson Bay and Foxe Basins Project is part of eventual re-interpretation of well the new Geological Survey of Canada Geo-mapping for data from northeastern Manitoba is underway. Similar Energy and Minerals (GEM) program, which aims to studies will be carried out on material from onshore wells study the hydrocarbon potential of these basins. In Mani- in northern Ontario and offshore wells under National toba, the Hudson Bay Basin is represented by the Paleo- Energy Board jurisdiction. zoic carbonate succession of the Hudson Bay Lowland The Hudson Bay Basin consists primarily of shallow (HBL) in the northeastern corner of the province. Re- marine to peritidal Upper Ordovician to Upper Devo- evaluation of existing geoscientific data through the lens nian carbonate sequences with locally abundant evapo- of modern ideas and theories and application of new sci- rite (Upper Silurian) and nearshore clastic rocks (Lower entific technologies are currently underway. In addition, Devonian); poorly constrained Mesozoic sediments are new data will be acquired in areas currently presenting interpreted as locally overlying the Paleozoic succes- knowledge gaps.
    [Show full text]
  • In Northern Foxe Basin, Nunavut
    Canadian Science Advisory Secretariat Central and Arctic Region Science Advisory Report 2014/024 ECOLOGICALLY AND BIOLOGICALLY SIGNIFICANT AREAS (EBSA) IN NORTHERN FOXE BASIN, NUNAVUT Figure 1. Northern Foxe Basin study area (red diagonal lines) with southern boundary line set at 68˚N. Context: During an arctic marine workshop held in 1994, Foxe Basin was identified as one of nine biological hotspots in the Canadian Arctic. In fall 2008 and winter 2009, the Oceans Program in Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO) Central and Arctic Region conducted meetings in Nunavut with the Regional Inuit Associations, Nunavut Tunngavik Inc., Nunavut Wildlife Management Board and Government of Nunavut to consider areas in Nunavut that might be considered for Marine Protected Area designation. The northern Foxe Basin study area, which includes Fury and Hecla Strait, was selected as one possible area (Figure 1). Based on a request for advice from Oceans Program, a science advisory meeting was held in June 2009 to assess the available scientific knowledge, and consider published local/traditional knowledge, to determine whether one or more locations or areas within the northern Foxe Basin study area would qualify as an Ecologically and Biologically Significant Area (EBSA). Two community meetings were subsequently held to incorporate local/traditional knowledge. This Science Advisory Report is from the June 29, 2009 (Winnipeg, MB), September 10, 2009 (Igloolik, NU) and November 19, 2009 (Hall Beach, NU) meetings for the Ecologically and Biologically Significant Areas selection process for northern Foxe Basin. Additional publications from this meeting will be posted on the DFO Science Advisory Schedule as they become available.
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Beyond
    MAGAZINE Protection in a time of change 7 Economic values 16 No. 3 2012 ThE CirclE lessons from elsewhere 27 PROTECTED AREAS AND BEYOND PUBLISHED BY THE WWF GLoBaL aRCTIC PRoGRaMME ThE CiRClE 3.2012 Contents EDITORIAL What is beyond protected areas? 3 In BRIEf 4 TOM BARRY, COURTnEY PRICE Arctic protected areas: conservation in a time of change 6 LISA SPEER, TOM LAUGHLIn EBSAs in the arctic marine environment 12 n IK LOPOUKHInE Protected areas and management of the Arctic 14 n IGEL DUDLEY Economic values of protected areas and other natural landscapes in the Arctic 16 BE nTE CHRISTIAnSEn, TIIA KALSKE Environmental protection in the Pasvik-Inari area 18 An n A KUHMOnEn, OLEG SUTKAITIS Representative network of protected areas to conserve northern nature 20 KARE n MURPHY, LISA MATLOCK Improving Alaska’s wildlife conservation through applied science 22 ZOLTA n KUn Supporting local development beyond commodities 24 ALBERTO ARROYO SCHnELL The natura 2000 network: where ecology and economy meet 27 CRISTIA n MOnTALVO MAnCHEnO Development of an ecological network approach in the Caucasus 28 ALEXA nDER SHESTAKOV A Pan-Arctic Ecological network: the concept and reality 30 TE H PICTURE 32 PROTECTED AREAS AND BEYOND Photo: Kitty Terwolbeck, Flickr/Creative commons Terwolbeck, Photo: Kitty The Circle is published quar- Publisher: Editor in Chief: Clive Tesar, COVER: Cotton grass in Sarek terly by the WWF Global Arctic WWF Global Arctic Programme [email protected] National Park in Sweden, one of Programme. Reproduction and 30 Metcalfe Street Editor: Lena Eskeland, [email protected] Europe's oldest parks. quotation with appropriate credit Suite 400 Photo: Kitty Terwolbeck, Flickr/Creative commons are encouraged.
    [Show full text]
  • Foxe Basin Polar Bear Project 2010 Interim Report – Part 1 (Part 2 ‐ Population Survey Report) Movements, Habitat, Population Delineation & Inuit Qaujimajatugangnit
    FINAL DRAFT Sahanatien & Derocher – Foxe Basin Polar Bears – 17 Nov 2010 Foxe Basin Polar Bear Project 2010 Interim Report – Part 1 (Part 2 ‐ Population Survey Report) Movements, Habitat, Population Delineation & Inuit Qaujimajatugangnit November 15, 2010 Vicki Sahanatien Andrew E. Derocher Department of Biological Sciences University of Alberta Edmonton, AB Canada T6G 2E9 PROJECT PERSONNEL Vicki Sahanatien, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta Dr. Andrew E. Derocher, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (available in Inuktitut translation) This report summarizes progress on the Foxe Basin Polar Bear Project from November 2009 – November 2010. 2010 field work consisted of searching for active and failed satellite collars using VHF telemetry while conducting the fall aerial population survey. Two female polar bears were captured and collars removed. Two other female polar bears with collars were observed but not captured, their collars continue to transmit. The trends in available habitat analysis is complete and publication nearing completion. Significant losses of preferred polar bear habitat were found in Foxe Basin, Hudson Strait and Hudson, particularly during freezeup, spring and breakup. The habitat selection model analyses (coarse and fine scale) are in progress and will be reported on in 2011. A summary of the 2009‐2010 polar bear movement data is presented in this report. As in previous years, the collared polar bears moved throughout Foxe Basin, Hudson Strait and northern Hudson Bay. Early breakup forced some bears ashore earlier than in previous years. A consolidation and analysis of all movement data from 2007‐ 2010 will be completed in 2011. FINAL DRAFT Sahanatien & Derocher – Foxe Basin Polar Bears – 17 Nov 2010 INTRODUCTION The Department of Environment (DOE) of the Government of Nunavut (GN) is responsible for the management and conservation of polar bear (Ursus maritimus) populations within its jurisdiction.
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Doctoral Dissertations of Interest to Ethnobiologists Xvii
    Journal of Ethnobiology 19(2): 251-257 Winter 1999 RECENT DOCTORAL DISSERTATIONS OF INTEREST TO ETHNOBIOLOGISTS XVII TERENCE E. HAYS Department ofAnthropology and Geography Rhode Island College Providence, RI 02908 USA ABSTRACT.- This bibliography includes recent dissertations of interest to ethnobiologisls. For each is given the page number where it may be found in Dissertation Abstracts (D.A.) and the order number for dissertation copies from University Microfilm International, P.O. Box 1764, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106­ 1346 U.s.A. (Telephone: 1-800-521-3042; 1-800-343-5299 from Canada). RESUMEN.- En este bibliografia se induyen disertaciones recientes de interes a los etnobi610gos. Par cada uno se da el numero de la pagina donde se halla el resumen en Dissertation Abstracts (D.A.), y el numero de encargar un ejemplar de la disertaci6n de University Microfilm International, P.O. Box 1764,AnnArbor, MI48106-1346 USA (telefono: 1-800-521-3042; desde Canada 1-800-343-5299). R~SUM~.- Cette bibliographie comprend quelques dissertationes recentes d'interel aux ethnobiologistes. Chez chaqu-une on donne Ie numero de la page ou se trouve Ie resume dans Dissertation Abstracts (D.A.), et Ie numero de commander un exemplaire de la dissertations de University Microfilm International, P.O. Box 1764, Ann Arbor, MI48106-1346 USA (telephone: 1-800­ 521-3042; de Canada 1-800-343-5299). INTRODUCTION This is the seventeenth in an annual series of bibliographies listing selected dissertations drawn from the pages of Dissertation Abstracts (D.A.). All listings were made by scanning the titles and abstracts published in D.A.
    [Show full text]
  • 17 Hudson Bay
    17/18: LME FACTSHEET SERIES HUDSON BAY COMPLEX LME tic LMEs Arc HUDSON BAY COMPLEX SEA LME 18 of Map Russia LME Baffin Island (Canada) Canada Hudson Bay Iceland Newfoundland & Greenland Labrador 17 "1 ARCTIC LMEs Large ! Marine Ecosystems (LMEs) are defined as regions of work of the ArcNc Council in developing and promoNng the ocean space of 200,000 km² or greater, that encompass Ecosystem Approach to management of the ArcNc marine coastal areas from river basins and estuaries to the outer environment. margins of a conNnental shelf or the seaward extent of a predominant coastal current. LMEs are defined by ecological Joint EA Expert group criteria, including bathymetry, hydrography, producNvity, and PAME established an Ecosystem Approach to Management tropically linked populaNons. PAME developed a map expert group in 2011 with the parNcipaNon of other ArcNc delineaNng 17 ArcNc Large Marine Ecosystems (ArcNc LME's) Council working groups (AMAP, CAFF and SDWG). This joint in the marine waters of the ArcNc and adjacent seas in 2006. Ecosystem Approach Expert Group (EA-EG) has developed a In a consultaNve process including agencies of ArcNc Council framework for EA implementaNon where the first step is member states and other ArcNc Council working groups, the idenNficaNon of the ecosystem to be managed. IdenNfying ArcNc LME map was revised in 2012 to include 18 ArcNc the ArcNc LMEs represents this first step. LMEs. This is the current map of ArcNc LMEs used in the This factsheet is one of 18 in a series of the ArcDc LMEs. OVERVIEW: HUDSON BAY COMPLEX LME The Hudson Bay (HB) complex is a large, Canadian inland sea with typical Arcc characteris=cs, including cold, dilute waters and complete, seasonal ice cover.
    [Show full text]
  • POLAR BEAR (Ursus Maritimus) in CMS APPENDIX II
    CMS Distribution: General CONVENTION ON UNEP/CMS/ScC18/Doc.7.2.11 MIGRATORY 11 June 2014 SPECIES Original: English 18th MEETING OF THE SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL Bonn, Germany, 1-3 July 2014 Agenda Item 7.2 PROPOSAL FOR THE INCLUSION OF THE POLAR BEAR (Ursus maritimus) IN CMS APPENDIX II Summary The Government of Norway has submitted a proposal for the inclusion of the Polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in CMS Appendix II th at the 11 Meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP11), 4-9 November 2014, Quito, Ecuador. The proposal is reproduced under this cover for its evaluation by th the 18 Meeting of the CMS Scientific Council. For reasons of economy, documents are printed in a limited number, and will not be distributed at the meeting. Delegates are kindly requested to bring their copy to the meeting and not to request additional copies. UNEP/CMS/ScC18/Doc.7.2.11: Proposal II/1 PROPOSAL FOR INCLUSION OF SPECIES ON THE APPENDICES OF THE CONVENTION ON THE CONSERVATION OF MIGRATORY SPECIES OF WILD ANIMALS A. PROPOSAL: To list the polar bear, Ursus maritimus, on CMS Appendix II B. PROPONENT: Norway C. SUPPORTING STATEMENT 1. Taxon 1.1 Classis: Mammalia 1.2 Ordo: Carnivora 1.3 Family: Ursidae 1.4 Genus/Species: Ursus maritimus (Phipps, 1774) 1.5 Common name(s): English: Polar bear French: Ours blanc, ours polaire Spanish: Oso polar Norwegian: Isbjørn Russian: Bélyj medvédj, oshkúj Chukchi: Umka Inuit: Nanoq, nanuq Yupik: Nanuuk 2. Biological data 2.1 Distribution Polar bears, Ursus maritimus, are unevenly distributed throughout the ice-covered waters of the circumpolar Arctic, in 19 subpopulations, within five range States: Canada, Denmark (Greenland), Norway, Russian Federation, and the United States.
    [Show full text]
  • An Oceanographic Study of James Bay Before the Completion of the La
    An Oceanographic Study of James before the Completion of the La Grande Hydroelectric Complex MOHAMMED I. EL-SABHl AND VLADIMIR G. KOUTITONSKY2 ABSTRACT. From observations madeat a number of oceanographic stations estab- lished in the northern part of James Bay, data for freshwater budget ice conditions, salinity, temperature distribution and water circulation are presented and discussed. With the completion of the hydroelectric complex,the mean annual rate of discharge of the La Grande River will increase by88 per cent, through addition of the diverted head waters of other rivers, but will become approximately constant throughout the year instead of being subject to spring peaks and winter lows. Changes to be expected in oceanographic conditionsin James Bay are discussed, and recommenda- tions madefor the planning of future studies. RlbUM&. Une étude océanographique de la baie James avant I'ach2vement du complexe hydroélectrique de la Grande rivi2re. En partant d'observations faites dans plusieurs stations océanographiquesinstallées dans la partie septentrionale de la baie James, on expose et on discute les données concernant le budget d'eau douce, les conditions de la glace, la distribution de la température et la circulation des eaux. Lorsque le complexe hydroélectrique sera terminé, le débit moyen de la Grande rivière augmentera de 88% grâce à la diversion des eaux d'amont d'autres rivihres. Par contre, ce débit deviendra à peu près constant tout au cours de I'année, au lieu de subir les variations saisonnières de maximum au printemps et de minimum en hiver. Suit une discussion des changements auxquels on peut s'attendre en ce qui concerne les conditions océanographiques et on fait des recommandations en vue de la planification des étudesà venir.
    [Show full text]
  • THE HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY and FOXE BASIN MARINE ECOSYSTEM: a Review
    THE HUDSON BAY, JAMES BAY AND FOXE BASIN MARINE ECOSYSTEM: A Review Agata Durkalec and Kaitlin Breton Honeyman, Eds. Polynya Consulting Group Prepared for Oceans North June, 2021 The Hudson Bay, James Bay and Foxe Basin Marine Ecosystem: A Review Prepared for Oceans North by Polynya Consulting Group Editors: Agata Durkalec, Kaitlin Breton Honeyman, Jennie Knopp and Maude Durand Chapter authors: Chapter 1: Editorial team Chapter 2: Agata Durkalec, Hilary Warne Chapter 3: Kaitlin Wilson, Agata Durkalec Chapter 4: Charity Justrabo, Agata Durkalec, Hilary Warne Chapter 5: Agata Durkalec, Hilary Warne Chapter 6: Agata Durkalec, Kaitlin Wilson, Kaitlin Breton-Honeyman, Hilary Warne Cover photo: Umiujaq, Nunavik (photo credit Agata Durkalec) TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Approach ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 1.3 References ........................................................................................................................................................... 5 2 GEOGRAPHICAL BOUNDARIES ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]