SCEC 2018 Toke-Etalv4

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

SCEC 2018 Toke-Etalv4 The Thousand Lake Fault: Earthquake Geology of a Long-Recurrence Normal Fault at the Eastern Edge of the Basin and Range 1 2 3 4 1s 3s 1s Contact Information: Dr. Nathan A. Toke, Associate Professor Nathan Toke, David Marchetti, Christopher Bailey, Robert Biek, Joseph Phillips, Hanna Bartram, and Clayton Forster Department of Earth Science, Utah Valley University 800 W. University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058 1 - Utah Valley University, Department of Earth Science 2 - Western State Colorado University, Geology Program 3 - College of William and Mary, Department of Geology 4 - Utah Geological Survey [email protected] http://research.uvu.edu/toke/ A Basin and Range Fault Abutting the Colorado Plateau Cumulative Long-term Fault Slip Rate Constraints from Fremont River Incision and Terrace Warping View Looking South along TLF, near Terraces in the area of greatest slope in the Fremont River gorge have Sunglow Campground incised 100 m in about 200 kya. Incision rates across the lower gradient Boulder Mountain TLF scarp are almost certainly less than within the gorge and therefore fault slip rates are even lower during the late Pleistocene. a 2300 • Age of Displaced Volcanics ~26 Mya (UGS and NIGL, 2012) Qt ~ 180m • Tectonic Initiation 10-16 Mya (e.g., McQuarrie and TLF Wernicke, 2005) 2200 Terr of aces Thou with a’ Qt ~ 60 m sand in 8 k Near Fault Center Lake m Remnant Qt ~ 35 m sFau lt (TL Volcanic Minimum Long Term Slip Rate ~ 0.1 mm/a Qt ~15 m F) Marchetti and Cerling, 2005: Tablelands Maximum Long Term Slip Rate ~ 0.25 mm/a 2100 3He ages - ~200 kya Also see Bartram, 2014 F C Terrace L Remnant T ~100 m Volcanic ) l 2000 Table lands s JM Terrace m a ~100 m s r e t a a’ e 1900 m ( n o i 1500-2500 m t a Repka, Anderson, and Finkel, 1997: v e l 1800 CRN Terrace Ages downstream E ~0.8 mm/yr Incision Rate Estimated headwaters exhumation of 30m/Ma Thousand Lake Mt 1700 Fremont 151 +/- 24 kya FR4 120 m Rabbit Valley/ R Aquarius Plateau iv TLF er 102 +/- 16 kya Late Pleistocene Fault Slip Rate Pr FR3 80 m 1600 of Alluvial Fan Scarp ile 60 +/- 9 kya FR2 45 m a (2x Vertical Exaggeration) a’ Fremont River 2230 FR1 20 m 2225 1500 2220 15000 35000 55000 2215 Distance Downstream (meters) Boulder Mt 2210 2205 25 50 75 100 125 150 175 200 225 250 275 Terrace sets approaching the TLF appear to show warping due to uplift of the footwall side of the fault. This observation The Thousand Lake Fault (TLF) trends north-south and dips to the west. The TLF fault zone extends for Only 3-4 meters of displacement across a fan could represent an opportunity to learn additional information about fault activity or other mechanisms of uplift that may be at least 50 km. Uplift along the east side of the fault has helped to produce the 11,000+ ft high Boulder and Thousand Lake Mountains (~1000 m of local relief). However, the Fremont River maintains a water that was abandoned 81-246 kya (Marchetti et al., 2005, active within the region (isostatic adjustments due to glaciation, sedimentation, etc.). gap across the TLF, demonstrating its competency to down-cut faster than the fault produces relief. 3He exposure ages): 0.01-0.05 mm/a. Elsewhere, Great Basin margin faults have relatively fast slip rates and high recurrence rates... Thousand Lake Fault Paleoseismic Trenching Lines fault Thousand Lake Fault Trench - South Wall Soil Bk-III fault queried South Wall North Wall contact Units Scale: OSL Sample Soil A - Horizon 1 Sq meter Colluvial Wedge Bulk Soil Sample Bench Soil Bk-II-III Soil-A Colluvial * * * * * * * * ** *** ** *** ** ** * *** * * *** ( * **** ** ****** * * ** * ** * *** ( ( ( * ** * * * ** * * * * ( * **** ** * * *** *** * * *** *** ( * * ** ** * * * * ** * * ( (( ( ( ( * ** * ** * * * ( ( *** ** * * * * * ** *** * * ( ( ( ( (( ( * * * * * ** * * *Wedge* * ( ( (( ( ( ( * * * * * ** * * * * * * ** * ( ( ( ** * * * ** * * * (( ( ( (( ( ( ** * * * * * * **** * ** ( * * * * * * ** ** * ** * * Soil-Bk-I-II ( *** * * * **** * * ***** * ** * ** * ***** * * ** * * ** ** * * * ** * * * * * Soil Bk I-II * ** * ** * * * * * ** *** * * * ** **** * * ** * * ** * ** * *** **** * * * * * * * * ** * * * * *** *** ** * * ** ***** * ** * * * * * * * ** * * * * * * * ** ** ** *** * * * * **** ** * ** *** * * *** ** * ** **** *** ** * * *** ******** * ** *** * * **** * ** ** * * * * *** ** * * ** * *** * * * ** * **** * ** * ** Colluival Wedge *** * *** * * ** * * * * * ** ** **** *** ** * * ** * * * ** * ** * *** * *** * Soil A - Horizon * ** * * * ** * ** ** ** * ** *** ** * Soil Bk-III Fissure Fill Soil Bk-I-II Soil-Bk-III Soil Bk-III Fluvial Gravels ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( (( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( Fluvial Sand ( Clast-V Debris Flow I Debris Flow II Paleoseismic Trench in old, abandoned fan Summary of Event Information: * Stage III soil carbonate is displaced by 0.8 to 1.2 m in each wall. * A wedge of scarp-derived colluvium overlies and mingles with a less developed soil carbonate horizon on the hanging wall. Conclusions: *The less developed soil carbonate is nearly absent on the footwall. *Both trenches have multiple fault zones, but only one is interpretable. * At least two events have ruptured the TLF since 81-246 kya *Multiple events have occurred, likely two, since the fan was active. * Recurrence rate is on the order of 50,000 to 125,000 years/event References Trench Site Additional Fault Exposures Anderson, R.E., and Barnhard, T.P., 1986, Genetic relationship between faults and folds and determination of Laramide and neotectonic paleostress, western Colorado Plateau-transition zone, central Utah: * Slip rate appears to be lower during the late Pleistocene Tectonics, v. 5, p. 335-357. Bartram, H.C., 2014, The Geometry, Kinematics, and History of the Thousand Lake Fault System, Central Utah. Undergraduate Honors Thesis, Paper 102, College of William and Mary. Biek, R.F., 2016, Interim Geologic Map of the Bicknell Quadrangle, Wayne County, Utah, Utah Geological * Slip rate ranges from 0.01-0.25 mm/a since the mid Miocene. Survey Open-File Report 654. Doelling H. and P. Kuehne, 2007, Interim Geologic Map of the East Half of the Loa 30’ x 60’ Quadrangle, Wayne, Garfield, and Emery Counties, Utah, Utah Geological Survey Open-File Report 489. Harty, K.M., 1987, Field reconnaissance of Thousand Lake fault zone: Utah Geological and Mineral Survey, memorandum, 2 p. Hecker, S., 1993, Quaternary tectonics of Utah with emphasis on earthquake-hazard characterization: Utah Geological Survey Bulletin 127, 157 p., 6 pls., scale 1:500,000. Additional work to be done: McQuarrie, N. and B.P. Wernicke, 2005,An Animated Tectonic Reconstruction of Southwestern North America since 36 MA. Geosphere, v. 1, no. 3, 147-172. Marchetti, D. and T. Cerling, 2005, Cosmogenic 3He exposure ages of Pleistocene debris flows and desert pavements in Capitol Reef National Park, Utah, Geomorphology, v. 67, 423-435. * OSL dating of fluvial sand and silt samples just below soil B horizons Marchetti, D., Dohrenwend J.C., and T.E. Cerling, 2005, Geomorphology and rates of landscape change in the Fremont River drainage, northwestern Colorado Plateau, in Pederson, J. and Dehler, C.M. eds.,Interior Western United States: to better constrain the age of alluvial fan abandonment. Geological Society of America Field Guide 6, doi: 10.1130/2005.fld006(04). National Agricultural Imagery Program, 2014, NAIP imagery acquired from Utah AGRC: https://gis.utah.gov/data/aerial-photography/ Repka, J., R. Anderson, and R. Finkel, 1997, Cosmogenic dating of fluvial terraces, Fremont River, Utah, * Structure from motion topographic surveys to better constrain Earth and Planetary Science Letters, V. 152, 59-73. Additional, faulted Quaternary exposures State of Utah, 2006, Auto-Correlated 5 meter DEM, Utah AGRC: https://gis.utah.gov/data/elevation-terrain-data/ the fan’s displacement. Toke, N. and J. Phillips, Preliminary Investigation of the Thousand Lake Fault from the mid Miocene to the late Pleistocene: have been recognized along separate An Approach for Characterizing Low Slip Rate Normal Faults using Geomorphology and Paleoseismology. 2017 Annual Meeting of the Geological Society of America in Seattle, WA. Bar surface traces of the TLF. Displacements Utah Quaternary Fault and Fold Database: https://geology.utah.gov/resources/data-databases/qfaults/ * Detailed along strike cross section displacement analysis to Utah Geological Survey and Nevada Isotope Geochronology Laboratory, 2012, 40Ar/39Ar Geochronology Results for the are also meter-scale. Forsyth Reservoir, Hilgard Mountain, and Mount Terrill Quadrangles, Utah, Open-File Report 594. constrain cumulative slip distribution along the fault and better Utah Geological Survey Aerial Imagery Collection: 1950 DKT, 1958 EEZ, and 1966 EEZ https://geodata.geology.utah.gov/imagery/ Geologic Map by Biek, 2016 estimate potential earthquake magnitude. .
Recommended publications
  • West Colorado River Plan
    Section 9 - West Colorado River Basin Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction 9-1 9.2 Background 9-1 9.3 Water Resources Problems 9-7 9.4 Water Resources Demands and Needs 9-7 9.5 Water Development and Management Alternatives 9-13 9.6 Projected Water Depletions 9-18 9.7 Policy Issues and Recommendations 9-19 Figures 9-1 Price-San Rafael Salinity Control Project Map 9-6 9-2 Wilderness Lands 9-11 9-3 Potential Reservoir Sites 9-16 9-4 Gunnison Butte Mutual Irrigation Project 9-20 9-5 Bryce Valley 9-22 Tables 9-1 Board of Water Resources Development Projects 9-3 9-2 Salinity Control Project Approved Costs 9-7 9-3 Wilderness Lands 9-8 9-4 Current and Projected Culinary Water Use 9-12 9-5 Current and Projected Secondary Water Use 9-12 9-6 Current and Projected Agricultural Water Use 9-13 9-7 Summary of Current and Projected Water Demands 9-14 9-8 Historical Reservoir Site Investigations 9-17 Section 9 West Colorado River Basin - Utah State Water Plan Water Planning and Development 9.1 Introduction The coordination and cooperation of all This section describes the major existing water development projects and proposed water planning water-related government agencies, and development activities in the West Colorado local organizations and individual River Basin. The existing water supplies are vital to water users will be required as the the existence of the local communities while also basin tries to meet its future water providing aesthetic and environmental values.
    [Show full text]
  • Our Secret Is Now Yours!
    EXPLORE... THREE ADVENTUROUS ZONES Travel Guide Travel The Highlands Capitol Reef East Desert Our secret is now yours! Wayne County, - Utah - USA TABLE OF CONTENTS WELCOME Wayne County, Utah - Capitol Reef Country 1- Cover Calendar of Events 2- Table of Contents April to October - Daily Walks / Capitol Reef Welcome to the scenically diverse region encompassing Wayne County YOUR NEXT GREAT 3- Welcome May Utah’s Capitol Reef Country. - Entrada Institute’s Cowboy Poetry and Music DESTINATION 4- Zones Festival This vacation destination includes mountains, forests, pinnacles, arches, 5- Zones July plateaus, and astounding desert - Torrey Apple Days landscapes. The contrast in elevation 6- Attractions - Capitol Reef Classic – Annual High Desert Bike and terrain makes this area a haven Race. for those seeking solitude or - Bicknell International Film Festival (BIFF) 7- Attractions outdoor adventure. August This region is an excellent multi-day 8- Activities - Women’s Redrock Music Festival vacation destination, central to Utah’s - Wayne County Fair scenic attractions, and easily acces- 9- Guides & Outfitters sible from major cities such as Salt September/October Lake City, Denver, and Las Vegas. 10- Maps - Heritage Star Festival - Wayne Wonderland Air show Unpack once and discover a realm 11- Maps that is conveniently situated be- On Going Events: May - September tween Bryce Canyon, the Grand 12- Hotels / Motels Staircase, Goblin Valley State Park, Capitol Reef National Park: Daily walks and nightly Canyonlands National Park, and amphitheatre programs mid May - September. Lake Powell. 13- Cabins / B&B Check at Visitor Center for Ripple Rock Nature Center schedule. Capitol Reef National Park. You’ll want to reserve several days to 14- Campgrounds (435) 425-3791, ext.
    [Show full text]
  • Episodic Sediment Delivery and Landscape Connectivity in the Mancos Shale Badlands and Fremont River System, Utah, USA
    Geomorphology 102 (2008) 242–251 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Geomorphology journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/geomorph Episodic sediment delivery and landscape connectivity in the Mancos Shale badlands and Fremont River system, Utah, USA Andrew E. Godfrey 1, Benjamin L. Everitt a, José F. Martín Duque b,⁎ a 170 W. 300 North, Ivins, Utah 84738, USA b Department of Geodynamics, Complutense University, 28040 Madrid, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: The Fremont River drains about 1000 km2 of Mancos Shale badlands, which provide a large percentage of the Accepted 23 May 2007 total sediment load of its middle and lower reaches. Factors controlling sediment movement include: Available online 18 May 2008 weathering that produces thin paralithic soils, mass movement events that move the soil onto locations susceptible to fluvial transport, intense precipitation events that move the sediment along rills and across Keywords: local pediments, and finally Fremont River floods that move the sediment to the main-stem Colorado River. Mancos Shale badlands A forty-year erosion-pin study has shown that down-slope creep moves the weathered shale crust an Erosion Mass movement average of 5.9 cm/yr. Weather records and our monitoring show that wet winters add large slab failures and Connectivity mudflows. Recent sediment-trap studies show that about 95% of sediment movement across pediments is Coupling accomplished by high-intensity summer convective storms. Between 1890 and 1910, a series of large autumn Arroyo cutting floods swept down the Fremont River, eroding its floodplain and transforming it from a narrow and meandering channel to a broad, braided one.
    [Show full text]
  • Fremont River Watershed Water Quality Management Plan
    FFrreemmoonntt RRiivveerr WWaatteerrsshheedd Water Quality Management Plan September 27, 2002 Includes TMDLs for: Johnson Valley Reservoir Forsyth Reservoir Mill Meadow Reservoir UM Creek Upper Fremont River Lower Fremont River i FREMONT RIVER WATERSHED WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The TMDL Process ........................................................................................ 1 1.2 Utah’s Watershed Approach .......................................................................... 3 2.0 WATERSHED DESCRIPTION ............................................................................... 5 2.1 Historic Perspective ....................................................................................... 5 2.2 Climate........................................................................................................... 6 2.3 Geology / Soils............................................................................................... 8 2.4 Land Use / Land Cover ................................................................................ 11 2.5 Hydrology..................................................................................................... 12 2.5.1 Reservoirs ....................................................................................... 12 2.5.2 Subbasins ....................................................................................... 18 2.5.3 Irrigation
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Flora and Vegetation of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah
    Vascular Flora and Vegetation of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah Kenneth D. Heil, J. Mark Porter, Rich Fleming, and William H. Romme Technical Report NPS/NAUCARE/NRTR-93/01 National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit U.S. Department of the Interior at Northern Arizona University National Park Service Cooperative Park Studies Unit Northern Arizona University The National Park Service (NPS) Cooperative Park Studies Unit (CPSU) at Northern Arizona University (NAU) is unique in that it was conceptualized for operation on an ecosystem basis, rather than being restrained by state or NPS boundaries. The CPSU was established to provide research for the 33 NPS units located within the Colorado Plateau, an ecosystem that shares similar resources and their associated management problems. Utilizing the university's physical resources and faculty expertise, the CPSU facilitates multidisciplinary research in NPS units on the Colorado Plateau, which encompasses four states and three NPS regions—Rocky Mountain, Southwest, and Western. The CPSU provides scientific and technical guidance for effective management of natural and cultural resources within those NPS units. The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social science research through the Colorado Plateau Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of techni­ cal workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Unit Staff Charles van Riper, III, Unit Leader Peter G. Rowlands, Research Scientist Henry E. McCutchen, Research Scientist Mark K. Sogge, Ecologist Charles Drost, Zoologist Elena T. Deshler, Biological Technician Paul R. Deshler, Technical Information Specialist Connie C. Cole, Editor Margaret Rasmussen, Administrative Clerk Jennifer Henderson, Secretary National Park Service Review Documents in this series contain information of a preliminary nature and are prepared primarily for internal use within the National Park Service.
    [Show full text]
  • Utah Scenic Byways Guide
    Utah is the place where prehistory intersects with the enduring spirit of the Old West. Wild, adventure-rich places cradle vibrant urban centers. With interstates and airplanes, the world can feel pretty small. On Utah’s designated scenic byways, the world feels grand; its horizons seem infinite. As you drive through Utah, you’ll inevitably encounter many of the state’s scenic byways. In total, Utah’s distinct topography provides the surface for 27 scenic byways, which add up to hundreds of miles of vivid travel experiences wherein the road trip is as memorable as the destination. Utah’s All-American Road: Scenic Byway 12 headlines the network of top roads thanks to landscapes and heritage unlike anywhere else in the nation. All of Utah’s scenic byways are explorative journeys filled with trailheads, scenic overlooks, museums, local flavors and vibrant communities where you can stop for the night or hook up your RV. Not sure where to start? In the following pages, you’ll discover monumental upheavals of exposed rock strata among multiple national and state parks along the All-American Road (pg. 4); dense concentrations of fossils along Dinosaur Diamond (pg. 8); and the blazing red cliffs and deep blue waters of Flaming Gorge–Uintas (pg. 12) — and that’s just in the first three highlighted byways. Your journey continues down two dozen additional byways, arranged north to south. Best of all, these byways access an outdoor adventureland you can hike, fish, bike, raft, climb and explore from sunup to sundown — then stay up to welcome the return of the Milky Way.
    [Show full text]
  • CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK, UTAH by David George Christiana
    Hydrology and water resources of Capitol Reef National Park, Utah : with emphasis on the middle Fremont River area Item Type Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); text Authors Christiana, David. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 27/09/2021 13:44:08 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/192054 HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES OF CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK, UTAH WITH EMPHASIS ON THE MIDDLE FREMONT RIVER AREA by David George Christiana A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF HYDROLOGY AND WATER RESOURCES in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE WITH A MAJOR IN HYDROLOGY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1991 2 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of requirements for an advance degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in his or her judgment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hydrometeorological Look at a Utah Flash Flood
    Western Region Technical Attachment No. 93-22 August 3, 1993 A HYDROMETEOROLOGICAL LOOK AT A UTAH FLASH FLOOD Brian Mcinerney · WSFO Salt Lake City Craig C. Schmidt · WSFO Portland Introduction On Friday, July 24, 1992, a flash flood occurred on the Grand Wash in south central Utah and continued into Capitol Reef National Park on the Fremont River (Map 1). July 24th is a state holiday, with peak visitor attendance in the state's national parks. During this period, the Grand Wash is normally dry and only experiences flows during very heavy runoff. On the morning of the flash flood, the wash was dry, but quickly rose and became a flash flood by early afternoon. Many visitors were swimming in the Fremont River at the park during the early afternoon hours, and left just minutes before the flooding would have reached them. Other recreationalists were stranded in and near the area due to the rising water in both the Grand Wash and the Fremont River. Meteorological Discussion The flash flood was caused by a single thunderstorm cell that developed in a typical synoptic weather pattern for July in Utah. A number of meteorological factors considered favorable for thunderstorm development existed, but flash flood potential was minimal. At 1200 UTC 24 July, a positive-tilt trough was present over the western United States, with the axis extending from the Washington/ Idaho border, across Oregon, and over the Pacific Ocean. At 250 mb (Fig. 1), the Great Basin was under a strong southwesterly jet ahead of the trough, with southern Utah positioned under the favorable right-rear quadrant of the jet maximum.
    [Show full text]
  • Andrew E. Godfrey" Benjamin L. Everitt A, Jose F. Martin Duque B.*
    Episodic sediment delivery and landscape connectivity in the Mancos Shale badlands and Fremont River system, Utah, USA Andrew E. Godfrey" Benjamin L. Everitt a, Jose F. Martin Duque b.* ·170 W 300 North, Ivins, Utah 84738, USA b Department of Geodynamics, Complutense UnivelSity, 28040 Madrid, Spain ABSTRACT The FremontRiver drains about 1000 km2 of Mancos Shale badlands, which provide a large percentage of the total sediment load of its middle and lower reaches. Factors controlling sediment movement include: weathering that produces thin paralithic soils, mass movement events that move the soil onto locations susceptible to fluvial transport, intense precipitation events that move the sediment along rills and across Keywords: local pediments, and finally FremontRiver floods that move the sediment to the main-stem ColoradoRiver. Mancos Shale badlands Erosion A forty-year erosion-pin study has shown that down-slope creep moves the weathered shale crust an Mass movement average of 5.9 cm/yr. Weather records and our monitoring show that wet winters add large slab failures and Connectivity mudflows.Recent sediment-trap studies show that about 95% of sediment movement across pediments is Coupling accomplished by high-intensity summer convective storms.Between 1890 and 1910, a series of large autumn Arroyo cutting floods swept down the Fremont River, eroding its floodplain and transforming it from a narrow and meandering channel to a broad, braided one.Beginning about 1940, the Fremont's channel began to narrow. Sequential aerial photos and cross-sections suggest that floodplain construction since about 1966 has stored about 4000 to 8000 m3 of sediment per kilometer per year.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Plain Delineation for the Fremont River and Bull Creek, Hanksville, Utah
    Flood Plain Delineation for the Fremont River and Bull Creek, Hanksville, Utah Prepared in cooperation with US Army Corps of Engineers ® Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5233 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover photo: Looking upstream, view of Fremont River north of Hanksville, Utah. Source: Terry Kenney, USGS, 2007. Flood Plain Delineation for the Fremont River and Bull Creek, Hanksville, Utah By Terry A. Kenney and Susan G. Buto US Army Corps of Engineers ® Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5233 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark D. Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS--the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Kenney, T.A., and Buto, S.G., 2008, Flood plain delineation for the Fremont River and Bull Creek, Hanksville, Utah: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008-5233, 28 p. Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2008/5233 iii Contents Abstract ........................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Evaluation of Native Fishes of the Fremont River in Or Near Capitol Reef National Park
    AN EVALUATION OF NATIVE FISHES OF THE FREMONT RIVER IN OR NEAR CAPITOL REEF NATIONAL PARK May, 1993 DALE K. HEPWORTH REGIONAL FISHERIES MANAGER MICHAEL J . OTTENBACHER REGIONAL FISHERIES BIOLOGIST DONALD L. ARCHER COORDINATOR FISHERIES RESEARCH Utah Department of Natural Resources DIVISION OF WILDLIFE RESOURCES Timothy H. Provan, Director Publication No . 93-5 Table of Contents Introduction 1 Method s and Study Area 2 Result s 3 Discus si on 6 Recommendation s 11 Referen ces 12 Tables Table 1. Physical descriptions of surv ey station s on the Fremont River in or near CRNP . • . 14 Tabl e 2. Numbers, species, and sizes of fishes sampled from the Fremont River in or near CRNP (exotic species are listed in parentheses) . 15 Table 3. Comparison of native fishes sampled during 1992 in the Fremont Ri ver in or near CRNP to previous collections (population estimates li sted as number per 1,000 ft2) .. 16 Figure Figure 1. Map of the Fremont River in and near Capitol Reef National Park showing survey stations, and detoxification stations . 17 Introduction Surveys of fish populations in the Fremont Ri ver in Capitol Reef National Park (CRNP) were conducted by the Utah Divi sion of Wildlife Resources (UDWR) in cooperation with the National Park Serv i ce to evaluate potential effects of an accidental release of rotenone and potassium permanganate into the river by UDWR. In 1991, UDWR discovered whirling disease (Nyxobo/us cerebra/is) in trout populations in the Fremont River drainage upstream from CRNP and in several nearby private aquaculture facilities. A plan was developed to control the spread of the disease which included chemical treatment projects to remove infected trout populations.
    [Show full text]
  • Endangered Species Biological Assessment for the Dirty Devil River
    ENDANGERED SPECIES BIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT FOR THE DIRTY DEVIL RIVER UNIT DECEMBER 1984 PROJECT SETTING Location The Dirty Devil River Unit is located in south central Utah. The unit includes the major tributaries of the Muddy Creek, Fremont River, Dirty Devil River and their tributaries. The unit area covers 4,300 square miles and includes portions of Sanpete, Sevier, Emery, Wayne, Piute, and Garfield Counties. The Bureau of Land Management (Bu) admin- isters approximately 75 percent of this land. The remaining area contains a large portion of Capitol Reef National Park, a small section of Glen Canyon National Recreation Area, portions of Fish Lake, Dixie and Manti-LaSal National Forests, and sections of state and private land. Elevations range from about 3,600 feet at the mouth of the Dirty Devil River to 11,500 feet in the mountain ranges at the head of the drainage basins. Purpose The purpose of the Dirty Devil River Unit is to reduce salinity in the Colorado River. The Dirty Devil River drainage contributes an average of approximately 155,000 tons of salt annually to the Colorado River, increasing the salinity concentrations of the river at Imperial Dam by approximately 15.5 mg/L of salt. The objective of the unit is to remove as much of the salt loading from the Dirty Devil River as is eco- nomically justifiable. Plan Description Although a variety of plans were investigated, saline water collec- tion from both Emery South Salt Wash and Hanksville Salt Wash remained the only plan considered acceptable (Figure 1). This alternative would collect base surface and subsurface flows from both washes.
    [Show full text]