DOCSLIB.ORG

Colorado River and Its Utilization

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR FRANKLIN K. LANE, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 395 COLORADO RIVER AND ITS UTILIZATION BY E. C. LA RUE WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1916 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBIJCATION MAY BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY CONTENTS. Introduction by N. C. Grover.............................................. 9 Acknowledgments.......................................................... 11 Physical features of the Colorado River basin............................... 12 Explorations.............................................................. 16 Population................................................................. 22 Comparison with the basin of the Nile....................................... 22 Water supply.............................................................. 24 Gaging stations........................................................ 24 Publications.......................................................... 31 Green River basin..................................................... 36 The main stream................................................... 36 Principal tributaries................................................ 39 Blacks Pork................................................... 39 Henrys Fork.................................................. 39 Yampa River................................................. 39 Ashley Creek................................................. 39 Duchesne River............................................... 40 White River.................................................. 40 Minnie Maud Creek........................................... 40 Price River.................................................... 40 San Raf ael River.............................................. 40 Discharge records............................ ; ..................... 41 Green River at Green River, Wyo............................... 41 Green River near Bridgeport, Utah.............................. 44 Green River at Jensen, Utah................................... 45 Green River at Little Valley, near Green River, Utah............ 45 Blacks Fork at Granger, Wyo................................... 48 Yampa River at Craig, Colo.................................... 50 Yampa River near Maybell, Colo................................ 52 Williams Fork at Hamilton, Colo................................ 53 Little Snake River near Dixon, Wyo............................. 54 Duchesne River at Myton, Utah................................. 55 Uinta River at Fort Duchesne, Utah............................. 58 Uinta River at Ouray School, Utah.............................. 60 White River at Meeker, Colo................................... 62 Price River near Helper, Utah.................................. 63 San Rafael River near Green River, Utah....................... 66 Grand River basin..................................................... 67 The main stream................................................... 67 Principal tributaries................................................ 69 Roaring Fork..............................................'... 69 Gunnison River............................................... 69 Dolores River................................................. 70 3 4 CONTENTS. Water supply Continued. Grand River basin Continued. Page. Discharge records............................... ,.................. 71 Grand River near Kremmling, Colo.............................. 71 Grand River at Glenwood Springs, Colo.......................... 73 Grand River near Palisades, Colo............................... 77 Grand River at Grand Junction, Colo............................ 79 Grand River near Fruita, Colo................................... > 80 Grand River near Moab, Utah.. ............................... 82 Roaring Fork at Glenwood Springs, Colo........................ 83 Gunnison River at Whitewater, Colo............................ 85 Gunnison River near Grand Junction, Colo....................... 86 Dolores River at Dolores, Colo................................... 86 San Miguel River at Fall Creek, Colo........................... 89 San Miguel River at Placerville, Colo............................ 90 Colorado River below mouth of Grand River.............................. 90 General features................................................... 90 Principal tributaries................................................ 92 Fremont River................................................. 92 Escalante River................................................ 92 San Juan River................................................ 93 Paria River................................................... 93 Kanab Creek................................................... 93 Little Colorado River........................................... 93 Virgin River................................................... 94 Williams River................................................. 94 Gila River..................................................... 95 Discharge records.................................................. 95 Colorado River at Hardyville, Ariz............................. 95 Colorado River at Yuma, Ariz.................................. 96 Fremont River near Thurber, Utah............................. 99 Muddy Creek at county bridge near Emery, Utah ............... 101 Escalante Creek near Escalante, Utah............................ 101 San Juan River at Farmington, N. Mex......................... 102 San Juan River at Shiprock, N. Mex............................ 104 Animas River at Farmington, N. Mex........................... 104 La Plata River near La Plata, N. Mex........................... 105 Mancos River at Mancos, Colo................................... 107 West Mancos River near Mancos, Colo........................... 108 Little Colorado River at Holbrook, Ariz......................... 108 Virgin River at Virgin, Utah.................................... 109 Santa Clara Creek near St. George, Utah......................... 110 Williams River near Swansea, Ariz.............................. 112 Gila River at Dome, Ariz....................................... 112 Irrigation................................................................. 113 History of development................................................ 113 Present and prospective irrigation systems.............................. 116 Basins below Grand River.......................................... 116 Gila River basin.............................................. 116 Williams River basin ........................................... 117 Kanab Creek basin............................................. 118 Paria River basin............................................. 118 Virgin River basin............................................ 119 CONTENTS. 5 Irrigation Continued. Present and prospective irrigation system Continued. Basins below Grand River Continued. Page. Little Colorado River basin..................................... 120 San Juan River basin.......................................... 121 Escalante River basin.......................................... 123 Fremont River basin.................................:.-........ 124 Grand River basin................................................. 125 Green River basin. ..................... ^.......................... 127 General conditions............................................ 127 San Rafael River.............................................. 128 Price River................................................... 128 Minnie Maud Creek........................................... 129 White River.................................................. 129 Duchesne River............................................... 130 Ashley Creek................................................. 131 Yampa River................................................. 131 Henrys Fork.................................................. 132 Minor tributaries............................................... 133 Streams of the basin in Wyoming................................ 133 Irrigation in Utah directly from Green River................... 134 Summary for Green River basin................................ 134 Irrigation from Colorado River direct................................ 136 General conditions............................................ 136 Duty of water.................................................. 136 Irrigation between Cottonwood Valley and Laguna dam......... 139 Below Laguna dam............................................. 140 Yuma project.............................................. 140 Imperial Valley project..................................... 140 Irrigable lands in Mexico................................... 144 Water diverted from the Colorado basin to other drainage basins.......... 145 Points of diversion ................................................ 145 Diversion from Green River basin.................................. 146 Strawberry Valley tunnel...................................... 146 Daniels Pass diversions ....................................... 147 Soldier Summit diversion ..................................... 148 Duchesne and Provo rivers diversion............................ 148 Diversion from Virgin River basin................................... 149 Diversions from Grand River basin, Colo............................. 149 General conditions............................................ 149 Grand
Recommended publications
  • Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR

    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR

    Arizona TIM PALMER FLICKR Colorado River at Mile 50. Cover: Salt River. Letter from the President ivers are the great treasury of noted scientists and other experts reviewed the survey design, and biological diversity in the western state-specific experts reviewed the results for each state. RUnited States. As evidence mounts The result is a state-by-state list of more than 250 of the West’s that climate is changing even faster than we outstanding streams, some protected, some still vulnerable. The feared, it becomes essential that we create Great Rivers of the West is a new type of inventory to serve the sanctuaries on our best, most natural rivers modern needs of river conservation—a list that Western Rivers that will harbor viable populations of at-risk Conservancy can use to strategically inform its work. species—not only charismatic species like salmon, but a broad range of aquatic and This is one of 11 state chapters in the report. Also available are a terrestrial species. summary of the entire report, as well as the full report text. That is what we do at Western Rivers Conservancy. We buy land With the right tools in hand, Western Rivers Conservancy is to create sanctuaries along the most outstanding rivers in the West seizing once-in-a-lifetime opportunities to acquire and protect – places where fish, wildlife and people can flourish. precious streamside lands on some of America’s finest rivers. With a talented team in place, combining more than 150 years This is a time when investment in conservation can yield huge of land acquisition experience and offices in Oregon, Colorado, dividends for the future.
  • CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX

    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT on the PHOENIX

    CENTRAL ARIZONA SALINITY STUDY --- PHASE I Technical Appendix C HYDROLOGIC REPORT ON THE PHOENIX AMA Prepared for: United States Department of Interior Bureau of Reclamation Prepared by: Brown and Caldwell 201 East Washington Street, Suite 500 Phoenix, Arizona 85004 Brown and Caldwell Project No. 23481.001 C-1 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................ 2 LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ 3 1.0 INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................. 4 2.0 PHYSICAL SETTING ....................................................................................................... 5 3.0 GENERALIZED GEOLOGY ............................................................................................ 6 3.1 BEDROCK GEOLOGY ......................................................................................... 6 3.2 BASIN GEOLOGY ................................................................................................ 6 4.0 HYDROGEOLOGIC CONDITIONS ................................................................................ 9 4.1 GROUNDWATER OCCURRENCE ....................................................................
  • Dolores River Restoration Partnership: a Private/Public Collaboration Dolores River Restoration Partnership

    Dolores River Restoration Partnership: a Private/Public Collaboration Dolores River Restoration Partnership

    DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION PARTNERSHIP: A PRIVATE/PUBLIC COLLABORATION DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION PARTNERSHIP • TIMELINE OF PARTNERSHIP • VISION AND GOALS OF PARTNERSHIP • WHY HAS THE DRRP BEEN SUCH A SUCCESSFUL PARTNERSHIP? • WHY THIS PARTNERSHIP HAS BEEN IMPORTANT TO THE BLM ORIGINS AND HISTORY OF DRRP • INITIAL RIPARIAN WORK ON SAN MIGUEL RIVER IN EARLY 2000’S – LED BY TNC, PRECURSOR TO THE DRRP. • 2009 – TNC AWARDED CONTRACT TO TAMARISK COALITION TO DEVELOP A STRATEGY FOR THE DOLORES RIVER (DR-RAP) • 2010 - DR-RAP FINALIZED • 2010 - FIRST MOU SIGNED • 2010 – FIRST BLM ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT • 2012 – AGO BLUE RIVERS DESIGNATION • 2015 – TRANSITION PLAN FINALIZED • 2015 – DOLORES RIVER HEALTHY LANDS FOCAL AREA • 2015 – SECOND MOU SIGNED • 2016 – SECOND BLM ASSISTANCE AGREEMENT DOLORES RIVER RESTORATION ACTION PLAN (DR-RAP) 1. IDENTIFIED A VISION: “A THRIVING DOLORES RIVER SYSTEM THAT IS ECOLOGICALLY, SOCIALLY, AND ECONOMICALLY SUSTAINABLE IN A MULTIUSE CONTEXT.” “A DOLORES RIVER WATERSHED DOMINATED BY NATIVE VEGETATION, WHERE THE THREATS FROM TAMARISK AND OTHER ASSOCIATED INVASIVE SPECIES HAVE BEEN MITIGATED AND THE RIPARIAN AREAS OF THE WATERSHED CONTINUE TO BECOME MORE NATURALLY FUNCTIONING, SELF-SUSTAINING, DIVERSE, AND RESILIENT OVER TIME.” DRRP MANAGEMENT GOALS Significantly increase the number of sustainable, healthy riparian plant Ecologic communities while reducing those dominated by tamarisk and other invasive, non-native plant species. Develop a professional, competitive, and efficient work force; improve Social aesthetic enjoyment;
  • Habitat Use by the Fishes of a Southwestern Desert Stream: Cherry Creek, Arizona

    Habitat Use by the Fishes of a Southwestern Desert Stream: Cherry Creek, Arizona

    ARIZONA COOPERATIVE FISH AND WILDLIFE RESEARCH UNIT SEPTEMBER 2010 Habitat use by the fishes of a southwestern desert stream: Cherry Creek, Arizona By: Scott A. Bonar, Norman Mercado-Silva, and David Rogowski Fisheries Research Report 02-10 Support Provided by: 1 Habitat use by the fishes of a southwestern desert stream: Cherry Creek, Arizona By Scott A. Bonar, Norman Mercado-Silva, and David Rogowski USGS Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Research Unit School of Natural Resources and the Environment 325 Biological Sciences East University of Arizona Tucson AZ 85721 USGS Arizona Cooperative Fish and Wildlife Unit Fisheries Research Report 02-10 Funding provided by: United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service With additional support from: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona Arizona Department of Game and Fish United States Geological Survey 2 Executive Summary Fish communities in the Southwest U.S. face numerous threats of anthropogenic origin. Most importantly, declining instream flows have impacted southwestern stream fish assemblages. Maintenance of water flows that sustain viable fish communities is key in maintaining the ecological function of river ecosystems in arid regions. Efforts to calculate the optimal amount of water that will ensure long-term viability of species in a stream community require that the specific habitat requirements for all species in the community be known. Habitat suitability criteria (HSC) are used to translate structural and hydraulic characteristics of streams into indices of habitat quality for fishes. Habitat suitability criteria summarize the preference of fishes for numerous habitat variables. We estimated HSC for water depth, water velocity, substrate, and water temperature for the fishes of Cherry Creek, Arizona, a perennial desert stream.
  • Cultural Landscape Planning: the Mexicali Valley, Mexico

    Cultural Landscape Planning: the Mexicali Valley, Mexico

    The Sustainable City VII, Vol. 1 457 Cultural landscape planning: the Mexicali Valley, Mexico R. I. Rojas-Caldelas1, C. A. Pena-Salmon1 & J. Ley-Garcia2 1Faculty of Architecture and Design, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, México 2Institute of Research in Social Sciences, Autonomous University of Baja California, Mexicali, México Abstract Initiating around the eighties, the academic training of landscape architects in Mexico is quite recent compared with the tradition in Europe and the U.S. Also new, is the development of landscape research conducted mainly by geographers, urban planners and other professionals trained in natural sciences, whose work is primarily oriented to land use management for urban development and conservation of natural resources or cultural heritage purposes. However, the issue of the cultural landscape in Mexico has been little explored and lacks any integrated and multidisciplinary methodology to bring together social, cultural and natural processes for study. Therefore, this work focuses on the presentation of an appropriate methodology to address the issue of the evolving cultural landscape of the Valley of Mexicali. This work has been developed into three stages: characterization, multiple assessment of landscape and integration of strategies for their management. Thus progress will be presented for the characterization of physical units, landscape components through pictures, visual and spatial patterns of landscape that structure the region and its settlements. As a partial result it was found that multi-valued zones visually and spatially exist in the Mexicali Valley, as well as activities that give character and differentiate it from other agricultural areas of Baja California. Keywords: cultural landscape, landscape assessment methodologies, visual and spatial assessment, sustainable landscape planning.
  • From the Editor Hike This Issue Features Ted Snyder, the Quiet Man Who Hikes in Pressed Save Trails Khakis and Leads the CMC Camporees

    From the Editor Hike This Issue Features Ted Snyder, the Quiet Man Who Hikes in Pressed Save Trails Khakis and Leads the CMC Camporees

    Carolina Mountain Club November 2012 From The Editor Hike This issue features Ted Snyder, the quiet man who hikes in pressed Save Trails khakis and leads the CMC camporees. He keeps the barbecue and Make Friends sides coming. Like the native plants we see on our hikes, he fits naturally in the woods and is rooted in this area in the best of ways. Don't forget to mark your calendar for the Spring Social (Arboretum Jamboree) for 2013 on April 27 with Ted Snyder conducting our program on the camporees and why they are held. Ted is a mountain In This Issue treasure. He received the CMC Distinguish Service Award. This award is for performing exceptional service during 2012. To see a Ted Snyder short video of Ted leading a hike on the spring 2012 camporee click on the picture below.Ted is the one in the khakis. Also see the camporee CMC Awards schedule for 2013 in this issue. Grand Canyon! Blaze Orange MST Trail Building CMC Stand On MST New State Park Camporees 2013 ATC Mountain Treasures With Ted Snyder Volunteers Needed Sawing If anyone has any articles for the newsletter, send them to me at Opportunity [email protected] Donate To The newsletter will go out the last Friday of every month. The deadline CMC to submit news is the Friday before it goes out. New CMC Council Sincerely, Stars At Kathy Kyle Carolina Mountain Club Annual Dinner CMLC Challenge Quick Links Enewscalendar Future Hikes Hike Reports Photo by Sawako Baiko Ted Snyder --- Patient, Determined Conservationist Interview by Kathy Kyle Ted Snyder received the CMC Distinguish Service Award at the 2012 annual meeting as lead organizer of the camporees that have taken CMC members to areas designated as mountain treasures.
  • Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started

    Arizona Fishing Regulations 3 Fishing License Fees Getting Started

    2019 & 2020 Fishing Regulations for your boat for your boat See how much you could savegeico.com on boat | 1-800-865-4846insurance. | Local Offi ce geico.com | 1-800-865-4846 | Local Offi ce See how much you could save on boat insurance. Some discounts, coverages, payment plans and features are not available in all states or all GEICO companies. Boat and PWC coverages are underwritten by GEICO Marine Insurance Company. GEICO is a registered service mark of Government Employees Insurance Company, Washington, D.C. 20076; a Berkshire Hathaway Inc. subsidiary. TowBoatU.S. is the preferred towing service provider for GEICO Marine Insurance. The GEICO Gecko Image © 1999-2017. © 2017 GEICO AdPages2019.indd 2 12/4/2018 1:14:48 PM AdPages2019.indd 3 12/4/2018 1:17:19 PM Table of Contents Getting Started License Information and Fees ..........................................3 Douglas A. Ducey Governor Regulation Changes ...........................................................4 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH COMMISSION How to Use This Booklet ...................................................5 JAMES S. ZIELER, CHAIR — St. Johns ERIC S. SPARKS — Tucson General Statewide Fishing Regulations KURT R. DAVIS — Phoenix LELAND S. “BILL” BRAKE — Elgin Bag and Possession Limits ................................................6 JAMES R. AMMONS — Yuma Statewide Fishing Regulations ..........................................7 ARIZONA GAME AND FISH DEPARTMENT Common Violations ...........................................................8 5000 W. Carefree Highway Live Baitfish
  • Water Resources of Bill Williams River Valley Near Alamo, Arizona

    Water Resources of Bill Williams River Valley Near Alamo, Arizona

    Water Resources of Bill Williams River Valley Near Alamo, Arizona GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1360-D DEC 10 1956 Water Resources of Bill Williams River Valley Near Alamo, Arizona By H. N. WOLCOTT, H. E. SKIBITZKE, and L. C. HALPENNY CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE HYDROLOGY OF THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1360-D An investigation of the availability of water in the area of the Artillery Mountains manganese deposits UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1956 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR Fred A. Seaton, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 45 cents (paper cover) CONTENTS Page Abstract....................................................................................................................................... 291 Introduction................................................................................................................................. 292 Purpose.................................................................................................................................... 292 Location................................................................................................................................... 292 Climatological data............................................................................................................... 292 History of development........................................................................................................
  • Figure 12B-01. Mountainous Volcanic Region

    Figure 12B-01. Mountainous Volcanic Region

    108°W 106°W F Ancestral ron t Rang LARIMER Uinta Sand Upl e ift Little Snake River Wash Ba North Platte River MOFFAT s Yampa River in JACKSON Park-Gore Range Axial ROUTT Ba s in Up li h ft rc as A ek e Dougl Cr White River GRAND 40°N Whi EXPLANATION RIO BLANCO 40°N te Ri Neogene Volcanics ver Upli Neogene Sediments ft Paleogene Volcanics Eagle River Blue River Paleocene-Cretaceous Intrusives Piceance Basin Roaring ForkCentral River Colorado TroughEAGLE Cretaceous Seaway Sediment GARFIELD Eagle River Sawatch Range Aquifers SUMMIT Mesozoic Sediment Aquifers Ancestral Rockies Basins Colorado River Precambrian Basement PITKIN Arkansas River East Muddy Creek Mountainous Region MESA LAKE PARK Unc Mountainous Valleys ompa ghre Up Colorado Plateaus Region lif DELTA t Laramide Basin Outlines Laramide Uplift Axis Uncompaghre Uplift G un Taylor River CHAFFEE nison Laramide Basin Axis GUNNISON Upl Ancestral Rockies Uplift Axis Uncompahgre River South Arkansas River ift Ancestral Rockies Basin Axis Paradox Basin FREMONT MONTROSE San Lui CUSTER s OURAY Up San Miguel River li ft 38°N SAN MIGUEL SAGUACHE 38°N Animas River HINSDALE DOLORES SAN JUAN Rio Grande MINERAL ag Dolores River n S West Dolores River ua J RIO GRANDE ALAMOSA e San MONTEZUMA n Dom Jua Archuleta Anticlinorium San Los Pinos River LA PLATA COSTILLA San Juan Piedra River Basin CONEJOS Tusas Uplift COSTILLA ARCHULETA COSTILLA 108°W 106°W 0 10 20 30 40 50 Miles Geology modified from Tweto (1979); structural features from Hemborg (1996). 0 10 20 30 40 50 Kilometers Figure 12b-01.
  • Colorado River Compact, 1922

    Colorado River Compact, 1922

    Colorado River Compact, 1922 The States of Arizona, California, Colorado, Nevada, New Mexico, Utah, and Wyoming, having resolved to enter into a compact under the Act of the Congress of the United States of America approved August 19, 1921 (42 Statutes at Large, page 171), and the Acts of the Legislatures of the said States, have through their Governors appointed as their Commissioners: W.S. Norviel for the State of Arizona, W.F. McClure for the State of California, Delph E. Carpenter for the State of Colorado, J.G. Scrugham for the State of Nevada, Stephen B. Davis, Jr., for the State of New Mexico, R.E. Caldwell for the State of Utah, Frank C. Emerson for the State of Wyoming, who, after negotiations participated in by Herbert Hoover appointed by The President as the representative of the United States of America, have agreed upon the following articles: ARTICLE I The major purposes of this compact are to provide for the equitable division and apportionment of the use of the waters of the Colorado River System; to establish the relative importance of different beneficial uses of water, to promote interstate comity; to remove causes of present and future controversies; and to secure the expeditious agricultural and industrial development of the Colorado River Basin, the storage of its waters, and the protection of life and property from floods. To these ends the Colorado River Basin is divided into two Basins, and an apportionment of the use of part of the water of the Colorado River System is made to each of them with the provision that further equitable apportionments may be made.
  • Imperial Irrigation Decision Support System Summary Report

    Imperial Irrigation Decision Support System Summary Report

    Draft Imperial Irrigation Decision Support System Summary Report Prepared for Imperial Irrigation District December 2001 2525 Airpark Drive Redding, California In Association with: Keller-Bliesner Engineering Davids Engineering Colorado State University Allen Engineering Contents Section Page 1.0 Introduction.........................................................................................................................1-1 IID Irrigation and Drainage Systems................................................................................1-1 Water Transfer Basics..........................................................................................................1-4 Imperial Irrigation Decision Support System..................................................................1-5 IID System Representation....................................................................................1-5 IIDSS Purpose .........................................................................................................1-5 Peer Review..........................................................................................................................1-6 2.0 Design of the Imperial Irrigation Decision Support System.....................................2-1 Irrigation System Overview...............................................................................................2-1 Delivery System......................................................................................................2-3 On-farm System......................................................................................................2-3
  • Desolation Canyon 5 DAY EXPEDITION

    Desolation Canyon 5 DAY EXPEDITION

    Desolation Canyon 5 DAY EXPEDITION The morning of your trip: Check out of your accommodations & eat a good breakfast. Meet in the morning at Moab Adventure Center at: A.M. Come dressed and ready to raft (see diagram below): We’ll caravan cars to our secure lot north of town for complimentary parking, then take a 20 minute bus ride to the Moab airport for a 40 minute flight on 5-9 passenger planes to Sandwash airstrip near the put-in for Green River. After landing, choose between a shuttle van or a scenic 1.5 mile (somewhat steep) hike down to the rafts waiting at the river. (Note: hike is optional). BIG SMILE A smile is a curve that HAT FOR SUN PROTECTION Wide-brimmed hat, baseball cap or visor sets a lot of things straight Gear provided: RETENTION DEVICE(S) COMFORTABLE SHIRT River guides invented these thirty years Best with UPF for sun protection Large water-resistant gear bag ago for hats and sunglasses. They work! containing a sleeping bag, sheet, and ground tarp. Once you are SUNGLASSES dressed and ready for the river LIFE JACKET / PFD They’re not just for Hollywood looks Available at the river’s edge, with the rafts that day, you should pack your personal duffel inside this large QUICK DRY SHORTS rubber bag where you can access LIP BALM & SUNSCREEN it again that night at camp. At least 30 SPF - You will have Makes sitting on the raft more comfortable time to apply this on the bus ride (Inaccessible during the day).