From a Technical Standpoint, What Is Firework Flash Powder?

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

From a Technical Standpoint, What Is Firework Flash Powder? This article originally appeared in Fireworks Business, No. 246, 2004. From a Technical Standpoint, What Is Firework Flash Powder? K. L. Kosanke and L. Weinman perature attainable in pyrotechnic reactions, only Introduction solids and liquids incandesce, gases do not. As a In a recently published article on the regulatory practical matter, metal oxides are the only pyro- definitions of firework flash powder[1] it was con- technic reaction products that are not gaseous at cluded that none of those definitions provided suf- high temperature. Thus metal fuels need to be pre- ficient information to objectively establish wheth- sent in substantial quantity in flash powders. See er or not a pyrotechnic composition is a flash Table 1, which is a list of the boiling point of powder. That is to say, those definitions are all some of the pyrotechnic reaction products. The subjective to the extent that they depend on the table has somewhat arbitrarily been divided into intended use of the composition and none provide species with boiling points above and below a quantifiable measure that can be used to deter- 2500 °C. Note that the oxides of zirconium, mag- mine whether a particular pyrotechnic composi- nesium, aluminum and titanium top the list. tion is a flash powder. The purpose of the present article is to suggest a general approach that might Table 1. Boiling Point of Some Pyrotechnic be used as the basis for producing a quantitative [2] definition of flash powder. Reaction Products. The reason such an objectively quantifiable Reaction Product Boiling Point (°C) definition is needed is that – from both a regulato- ZrO2 ≈ 5000 ry and safety standpoint – flash powders are treat- MgO 3600 ed differently than other pyrotechnic composi- Al2O3 2980 tions. The rationale for this is that the hazards TiO2 2500–3000 posed by firework flash powders are generally SiO2 2230 significantly greater than most other commonly ZnO 1975 encountered pyrotechnic compositions. Accord- K2SO4 1689 ingly, both pyrotechnic manufacturers and regula- KCl 1500 tory enforcement personnel need to be able to un- K2CO3 d > 891(Tm) ambiguously identify whether a composition is or H2O 100 is not a flash powder. d = decomposes Background Discussion Tm = melting point Before proposing a possible framework for a A second requirement for the production of the quantitative definition of firework flash powder, bright white flash of light characteristic of fire- consider the following non-quantitative definition work flash powders is a high reaction temperature. as a starting point for the discussion. To see why this is the case, consider Figure 1, Firework Flash Powder: Any active metal which presents information on the light produced [3] fueled pyrotechnic composition suitable for use in by incandescent bodies at various temperatures. a firework salute (or firecracker). Note particularly the two curves labeled 1727 C and 3727 C. While these two curves correspond to In considering this definition it is appropriate only doubling the absolute temperature, the inten- to consider why it requires that the pyrotechnic sity of light produced in the visible region in- composition be metal fueled. The bright white creases by a factor of approximately 500. (Be- flash of light characteristic of flash powders is cause the perception of light by humans follows produced by incandescence. At the reaction tem- an approximate logarithmic relation, the perceived Selected Pyrotechnic Publications of K. L. and B. J. Kosanke Page 777 brightness produced by an incandescent object at Table 2. Heat of Reaction for the Burning of 3727 °C would be quite a bit greater, but it would Various Metal Fuels. [4] not be 500 times greater, than the light from the ° ° object at 1727 C.) Note also that at 1727 C al- Metal Reaction Heat of Reaction most all of the emitted light is in the long wave- Fuel Product (–kJ/mol) length (red) end of the visible range, whereas at Ti TiO2 945 3727 °C the wavelengths of light are more nearly Si SiO2 911 balanced across the visible range. The effect is Al Al2O3 838 that the perceived color of incandescent light pro- Mg MgO 602 duced at 1727 ºC will be distinctly orangish yel- Fe Fe O 412 ° 2 3 low, whereas that produced at 3727 C will be Zn ZnO 348 perceived as white. Accordingly, to produce a Pb PbO2 277 flash of light that is both bright and white, a high Cu CuO 157 reaction temperature is essential. Obviously metals do not all produce the same amount of thermal energy upon burning. While there is no universally accepted definition of an active metal, one possible definition could be those metals that burn with the production of the most abundant thermal energy. Accepting that definition for this article, those metals near the top of Table 2 would be the most active metals and would produce the highest reaction temperatures (i.e., those most capable of producing the brightest and whitest flashes of light). The second part of the above non-quantified definition for firework flash powder is that it be suitable for use in a firework salute. In essence this is just saying that the composition must be a reasonably violent explosive such that it is capa- ble of producing the thunderous report (blast wave) expected for firework salutes when only Figure 1. Incandescent emissions at various tem- mildly confined in paper casings. To constitute a peratures. [3] reasonably violent explosive is saying in effect that: 1) the oxidizer must be reasonably effective, 2) the ratio of ingredients must be approximately The reaction temperatures for pyrotechnic correct, and 3) the particle size of the components compositions depend on a number of factors, but (most especially the active metal fuel) must be generally by far the most important is the thermo- sufficiently small. These are all important factors dynamic heat of reaction for the composition known to affect reaction rate.[5] Reasonably effec- (now more properly termed enthalpy of reaction). tive oxidizers include the chlorates, perchlorates To see why, for the production of high reaction and probably the nitrates commonly used in fire- temperatures, it is important that the metal fuel be work. The approximately correct ratio of ingredi- what is commonly described by a chemist as an ents would be those reasonably near the stoichio- active metal, consider the data in Table 2. Listed metric ratio of ingredients. Sufficiently small par- there are the heats of reaction for the burning of ticle size of ingredients is required such that most various metals (i.e., their combining with oxygen). of the fuel and oxidizer are fully reacted in the The table has somewhat arbitrarily been divided explosion and not blown clear such as in the form into metals with heats of reaction above and be- of sparks. low 500 kJ/mol. Note that titanium, silicon, alu- minum and magnesium top the list. Page 778 Selected Pyrotechnic Publications of K. L. and B. J. Kosanke Structure for a Potential Quantitative powder. One example of such a pyrotechnic com- Definition position is sparkler composition.[7] Thus some means of excluding such compositions from the At this point in the discussion, it seems appro- firework flash powder definition is needed. It is priate to begin the attempt to produce the prom- suggested that there be an additional requirement ised basis for a quantitative definition for firework in the definition of firework flash powder, one flash powder. This will be done in the form of an relating to the explosivity of the pyrotechnic com- actual definition; however, at this time the specific position. In the definition to be proposed, this ad- numbers to be used in the quantitative definition ditional requirement is stated as an exception. will not be included. (These values will need to be Thus the additional requirement would not always determined as a result of research and a consensus need to be considered. If a manufacturer is willing of opinion between representatives of the industry to accept that a pyrotechnic composition is a flash and enforcement agencies.) powder based on its metal content alone, that is Firework Flash Powder: Any pyrotechnic their choice and nothing more would need to be composition containing at least N1% of a metal considered. However, for any pyrotechnic compo- powder finer than N2 mesh. sition for which the limits on metal powder con- In terms of metal content, the above suggested tent were exceeded, yet the manufacturer believed definition is essentially that proposed to the US that composition was not sufficiently explosive so Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explo- as to constitute it being classed as a flash powder, sives (ATF) by the American Pyrotechnic Associ- a relatively simple test could be conducted. That ation (APA), which follows: explosivity test would then determine whether that particular pyrotechnic composition was flash Flash Powder: Pyrotechnic compositions con- powder for the purposes of regulation. A possible sisting of one or more oxidizers such as potassium expanded definition for firework flash powder perchlorate, potassium chlorate, ammonium per- follows. chlorate, barium nitrate, or potassium nitrate combined with 25% or more by weight of metal Firework Flash Powder: Any pyrotechnic powder such as aluminum, magnesium, or magne- composition containing at least N1% of a metal sium/aluminum alloy (“magnalium”) or 30% or powder finer than N2 mesh, except when that py- more by weight of a combination of metal powder rotechnic composition does not produce an explo- combined with sulfur or antimony sulfide. The sion measuring at least N3 under specified test term “powder” means material capable of pass- conditions. [6] ing through a standard 275-mesh sieve. As with determining the values of N1 and N2, While the authors agree in large measure with the value of N3 and the standard explosivity test the APA approach, it is felt that test data needs to conditions will need to be arrived at by consensus.
Recommended publications
  • ENCYCLOPEDIA of CHEMISTRY & EXPLOSIVES MATERIALS Abelite
    ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CHEMISTRY & EXPLOSIVES MATERIALS A Abelite An explosive, composed mainly of ammonium nitrate and trinitrotoluene. Absolute Zero The least possible temperature for all substances. Generally accepted as -273.15ÝC AC Alternating current. Acceptance Quality Level (AQL) A nominal value expressed in terms of percentage defective per hundred units, by which a group of sampling plans is identified. The sampling plans so identified have a high probability of accepting lots containing material with a process average not greater than the designed value of the AQL. Acetin [CH3COOC3H5(OH)2] also known as glyceryl monoacetate, a colourless hydroscopic liquid. Used as an intermediate for various explosives, and a solvent for various dyes. Acetone [CH3COCH3] colourless, flammable liquid. Acetone is widely used in industry as a solvent for many organic substances. It is used in making synthetic Resins and fillers, smokeless powders, and many other organic compounds. Boiling Point 56ÝC. Useful solvent for acetylene, also known as the simplest saturated ketone. Acetylene or ethyne, a colourless gas and the simplest alkyne Hydrocarbon. Explosive on contact with air, it is stored dissolved under pressure in Acetone. It is used to make neoprene rubber, plastics, and resins. The oxyacetylene torch mixes and burns oxygen and acetylene to produce a very hot flame-as high as 3480ÝC (6300ÝF)-that can cut steel and weld iron and other metals. Produced by the action of wateron calcium carbide and catalytically from naphtha. Acetylide A carbide formed by bubbling acetylene through a metallic salt solution, eg cuprous acetylide, Cu2C2. These are violently explosive compounds. Acid Any substance capable of giving up a proton; a substance that ionizes in solution to give the positive ion of the solvent; a solution with a pH measurement less than 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Match” …………………………………………… P
    Selected Pyrotechnic Publications of K.L. and B.J. Kosanke Part 5 (1998 through 2000) This book contains 134 pages Development of a Video Spectrometer …………………………………………… P. 435-445. Measurements of Glitter Flash Delay, Size and Duration ……………………… P. 446-449. Lift Charge Loss for a Shell to Remain in Mortar ……………………………… P. 450-450. Configuration and “Over-Load” Studies of Concussion Mortars ……………… P. 451-463. Quick Match – A Review and Study ……………………………………………… P. 464-479. Pyrotechnic Primes and Priming ………………………………………………… P. 480-495. Dud Shell Risk Assessment: NFPA Distances …………………………………… P. 496-499. Dud Shell Risk Assessment: Mortar Placement ………………………………… P. 500-503. Performance Study of Civil War Vintage Black Powder ……………………… P. 504-509. CAUTION: Very Fast “Black Match” …………………………………………… P. 510-512. Peak In-Mortar Aerial Shell Accelerations ……………………………………… P. 513-516. Firing Precision for Choreographed Displays …………………………………… P. 517-518. Sticky Match and Quick Match: Temperature Dependent Burn Times ……… P. 519-523. Mortar Separations in Troughs and Drums …………………………………… P. 524-530. Preliminary Study of the Effect of Ignition Stimulus on Aerial Shell Lift Performance …………………………………………………… P. 531-535. Pyrotechnic Particle Morphologies – Metal Fuels ……………………………… P. 536-542. Peak Mortar Pressures When Firing Spherical Aerial Shells …………………… P. 543-544. Indoor Pyrotechnic Electrostatic Discharge Hazard …………………………… P. 545-545. Pyrotechnic Particle Morphology – Low Melting Point Oxidizers ……………… P. 546-556. An earlier version
    [Show full text]
  • M-80 (Explosive) - Wikipedia,Visited the Free Encyclopediaon 8/14/2015 Page 1 of 4
    M-80 (explosive) - Wikipedia,visited the free encyclopediaon 8/14/2015 Page 1 of 4 M-80 (explosive) From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see M80. M-80s are an American class of large firecrackers, sometimes called SALUTES.[1] The Simulator, Artillery, M-80 was originally made in the early 20th century by the U.S. military to simulate explosives or artillery fire;[2] later, M-80s were manufactured as fireworks. Traditionally, M-80s were made from a small cardboard 1 tube, often red, approximately 1 ⁄2 inches (3.8 cm) long 9 and ⁄16 inch (1.4 cm) inside diameter, with a fuse or wick coming out of the side; this type fuse is commonly known as cannon fuse or Visco fuse, after a company responsible for standardizing the product. The tubes M-80 Salute (BOOTLEG) often hold approximately 2½–3 grams of pyrotechnic flash powder; many sources state that an M-80 carries 3 grams of powder.[3] Contents ◾ 1 Legality ◾ 1.1 Canada ◾ 1.2 United States ◾ 2 Accidents ◾ 3 References ◾ 4 Further reading Legality Canada https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M-80_(explosive) 8/14/2015 M-80 (explosive) - Wikipedia,visited the free encyclopediaon 8/14/2015 Page 2 of 4 M-80s are not authorized under the law, thus making importation, possession, transportation, storage or manufacturing illegal in Canada.[4] Firecrackers, including the M-80, can be purchased from Native Reserves in Canada, as they have different governing laws. United States Due to property damages and bodily harm caused by M-80s, Class C fireworks—now known as consumer fireworks (class 1.4G), as opposed to display fireworks (which were Class B, and are now 1.3G)[5]— civilians require a license, issued by federal authorities, for pyrotechnic devices containing a charge in excess of 50 milligrams of pyrotechnic flash powder.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Fireworks Safety Standards Development Status Report
    FIREWORKS SAFETY STANDARDS DEVELOPMENT PROJECT FY 2013 STATUS REPORT October 2013 For further information contact: Dr. Christopher J. Musto, Project Manager Directorate for Laboratory Sciences U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (301) 987-2090 [email protected] Dr. Andrew Lock Directorate for Laboratory Sciences U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (301) 987-2099 [email protected] This report was prepared by the CPSC staff, has not been reviewed or approved by, and may not necessarily reflect the views of, the Commission. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The U.S Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC, the Commission) is evaluating the need to amend its regulations for fireworks devices. CPSC staff evaluated issues concerning the explosive power of aerial fireworks. Aerial fireworks devices intended to produce an audible effect are limited to 130 mg (2 grains) of pyrotechnic composition, according to 16 C.F.R. § 1500.17(a)(3). Because the regulation only limits the amount of pyrotechnic composition for devices intended to produce an audible effect, compliance determinations can be made only after a subjective determination of intent to produce an audible effect. In 2012, staff conducted testing to evaluate two different approaches to replacing the regulation limiting pyrotechnic composition of devices intended to produce an audible effect; staff considered potential alternative regulations, based on the explosive power of fireworks devices. The American Fireworks Standards Laboratory (AFSL) had previously developed a “Black Powder Equivalency Test.” CPSC staff investigated and found that this test can distinguish between the energetics of black powder, hybrid powders, and flash powder, but the test does not consider the particular construction of a shell.
    [Show full text]
  • Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division Materials
    Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division Materials Analysis EXPLOSIVES TRAINING MANUAL May 2018 Washington State Patrol Crime Laboratory Division Explosives Laboratory Training Manual Contents 1 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE ................................................................................................................... 7 1.2 ORGANIZATION OF THE TRAINING MANUAL ................................................................................ 7 2 EXPLOSIVES ANALYSIS OVERVIEW ........................................................................................................ 9 2.1 OBJECTIVES ................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.2.1 Definitions ............................................................................................................................. 9 2.3 SUGGESTED READINGS ............................................................................................................... 11 2.3.1 Introduction ........................................................................................................................ 11 2.3.2 Scene ..................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Part II EXPLOSIVES INCIDENTS ANALYSIS
    If you have issues viewing or .accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov. lIP :. I , . •• , .. I , It • ~ • -. I .. • r • -. I , I "$: .; ~.. ,~--.~.~. " I I I I ,.. .~;- ""', ....... ~~-, ~,-- - --------~- .. ". ---------------- Cover: Top Photo: The results of an explosive device that detonated beneath the vehicle as it was traveling through the Kansas City, Missouri, area. The detonation ldlled the driver and severely injured the driver's wife. (Photo .courtesy of Dan Dyer, the News Leader Newspaper.) Bottom Photo: The scene of an explosion in Duncanville, Alabama, that killed the two occupants of the trailer. 12608.1 U.S. Department of Justice National Institute of Justice This document has been reproduced exactly as received from the person or organization originating it. Points of view or opinions stated In this document are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position or policies of the National Institute of Justice. Permission to reproduce this "'IJIi". material has been granted by U.S. Dept. of Treasury/Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco & Firearms to the National Criminal Justice Reference Service (NCJRS). Further reproduction outside of the NCJRS system requires permis­ sion of the ~ owner. Dedication This year we have seen a significant increase in the number of injuries sustained by our State and local counterparts in the law enforcement and fire service communities. The dangers inherent to their line of work are a given; however, the ever-changing environment in which they work has increased these dangers. Booby-trapped drug operations and illicit explosives manufac­ turing operations are but a few of the criminal activities that present such dangers, not only to them but to the public as well.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Patents on Powder Metallurgy
    UNITED STATES PATENTS ON POWDER METALLURGY UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS U. S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE W. AVERELL HARRIMAN, Secretary NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS E. U. CONDON, Director NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATION M184 UNITED STATES PATENTS ON POWDER METALLURGY By RAYMOND E. JAGER and ROLLA E. POLLARD Issued July 1 , 1947 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1947 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U. S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, D. C. - Price 30 cents PREFACE Patents are disclosures of inventions, in return for which the inventor is given the right to exclude all others from making, using, or selling his invention for the term of 17 years. After this period the invention becomes public property. Patent literature is a valuable source of technical information, for, by these disclosures, the de- velopment of an art may be traced through a long period of time. This publication, based on a collection search of United States patents of the present series, which began in 1836, represents more than a century of progress in the art of powder metallurgy. Patents issued up to January 1, 1947, are included. The collection search was made for the National Bureau of Standards by Invention, Inc., under the direction of Raymond E. Jager, president: R. E Pollard, metallurgist, of the Bureau's staff, edited the abstracts, eliminating those not pertinent to powder metallurgy, and revised the classification. E. U. Condon, Director. n CONTENTS Page. Preface II I. Introduction 1 II. Production of metal powders 1 2 1. Atomization, vaporization, spraying molten metal, or physically contacting it with other fluids, to obtain fine particles 2 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Making Plastic Explosives from Bleach by the Jolly Roger Potassium
    Making Plastic Explosives from Bleach by The Jolly Roger Potassium chlorate is an extremely volatile explosive compound, and has been used in the past as the main explosive filler in grenades, land mines, and mortar rounds by such countries as France and Germany. Common household bleach contains a small amount of potassium chlorate, which can be extracted by the procedure that follows. First off, you must obtain: 1.A heat source (hot plate, stove, etc.) 2.A hydrometer, or battery hydrometer 3.A large Pyrex, or enameled steel container (to weigh chemicals) 4.Potassium chloride(sold as a salt substitute at health and nutrition stores) Take one gallon of bleach, place it in the container, and begin heating it. While this solution heats, weigh out 63 grams of potassium chloride and add this to the bleach being heated. Constantly check the solution being heated with the hydrometer, and boil until you get a reading of 1.3. If using a battery hydrometer, boil until you read a FULL charge. Take the solution and allow it to cool in a refrigerator until it is between room temperature and 0øC. Filter out the crystals that have formed and save them. Boil this solution again and cool as before. Filter and save the crystals. Take the crystals that have been saved, and mix them with distilled water in the following proportions: 56 grams per 100 milliliters distilled water. Heat this solution until it boils and allow to cool. Filter the solution and save the crystals that form upon cooling. This process of purification is called "fractional crystallization".
    [Show full text]
  • Emerging Techniques for the Detection of Pyrotechnic Residues from Seized
    Forensic Science International 308 (2020) 110160 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forensic Science International journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/forsciint Emerging techniques for the detection of pyrotechnic residues from seized postal packages containing fireworks a,b, c b Karlijn D.B. Bezemer *, Thomas P. Forbes , Annemieke W.C. Hulsbergen , c c b a Jennifer Verkouteren , Shannon T. Krauss , Mattijs Koeberg , Peter J. Schoenmakers , c a,d Greg Gillen , Arian C. van Asten a University of Amsterdam, Faculty of Science, Van ‘t Hoff Institute for Molecular Sciences, Amsterdam, the Netherlands b Netherlands Forensic Institute, The Hague, the Netherlands c National Institute of Standards and Technology, Materials Measurement Science Division, Gaithersburg, MD, USA d CLHC, Amsterdam Center for Forensic Science and Medicine, University of Amsterdam, P.O. Box 94157, 1090 GD Amsterdam, the Netherlands A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T Article history: High volume screening of parcels with the aim to trace the illegal distribution and selling of fireworks Received 23 October 2019 using postal services is challenging. Inspection services have limited manpower and means to perform Received in revised form 7 January 2020 extensive visual inspection. In this study, the presence of solid pyrotechnic residues collected from Accepted 20 January 2020 cardboard shipping parcels containing fireworks was investigated for direct in-field chemical detection. Available online 24 January 2020 Two emerging trace detection techniques, i.e., capillary electrophoresis (CE)-based inorganic oxidizer detector and infrared thermal desorption (IRTD) coupled with direct analysis in real time mass Keywords: spectrometry (DART-MS), were investigated for their potential as screening tools.
    [Show full text]
  • Explosive Information
    EXPLOSIVES = COMPLETE TUTORIAL Compiled by Red Dragon CHEMICAL SUBSTITUTION CHART Peroxide Lead acetate sugar of lead Lead tetroxide red lead Magnesium silicate talc Magnesium sulfate Epsom salts Naphthalene mothballs Phenol carbolic acid Potassium bitartrate cream of tartar Potassium chromium sulfate chrome alum Potassium nitrate saltpeter Silicon dioxide sand Sodium bicarbonate baking soda Sodium borate borax Sodium carbonate washing soda Sodium chloride salt Sodium hydroxide lye Sodium silicate water glass Sodium sulfate Glauber's salt Sodium thiosulfate photographer's hypo BOTTLE GRENADE This one's really simple, but a lot of people forget about these kinds Of simple weapons. Anyway, get yourself a glass bottle, some vinegar and Baking soda, (Any substances that react in an expulsion of gas will work) and a good strong SCREW-ON cap. When you want to fire it, you put the Vinegar and baking soda in the bottle, (The amounts depend on the size of the bottle...) and toss it. It works, but it's mainly an antipersonnel weapon, and if the bottle breaks you're screwed... TENNIS BALL CANNON Get 4 or 5 seven-up cans, cut the tops off of 3 or 4 respectively, and put holes (SMALL ONES, please...) in the top of the last can, drill a hole the diameter of an Ohio Blue Tip match in the side of the can, about 1&122 inches from the bottom of the can. Then stick a tennis ball in the top of the cannon, squirt in some lighter fluid in the little hole, and hold a flame under the hole. If you've done it right, it'll work.
    [Show full text]
  • Double Click on the Seminar Number to Jump to Th
    Papers Published in the Proceedings of the International Pyrotechnics Seminars (double click on the Seminar number to jump to that location) 1 Estes Park, Colorado, USA 1968 2 Snowmass-at-Aspen Colorado, USA 1970 3 Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA 1972 4 Steamboat Village, Colorado, USA 1974 5 Vail, Colorado, USA 1976 6 Estes Park, Colorado, USA 1978 7 Vail, Colorado, USA 1980 8 Steamboat Springs, Colorado, USA 1982 9 Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA 1984 10 Karlsruhe, Germany 1985 11 Vail, Colorado, USA 1986 12 Juan les Pins, France 1987 13 Grand Junction, Colorado, USA 1988 14 Jersey, Channel Islands, UK 1989 15 Boulder, Colorado, USA 1990 16 Jönköping, Sweden 1991 17 Beijing, China 1991 18 Breckenridge, Colorado, USA 1992 19 Christchurch, New Zealand 1994 20 Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA 1994 21 Moscow, Russia 1995 22 Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 1996 23 Tsukuba, Japan 1997 24 Monterey, California, USA 1998 25 Brest, France 1999 26 Nanjing, Jiangsu, P.R.. China 1999 27 Grand Junction, Colorado, USA 2000 28 Adelaide, Australia 2001 29 Westminster, Colorado, USA 2002 30 Saint Malo, France 2003 31 Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 2004 32 Karlsruhe, Germany 2005 33 Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 2006 34 Beaune, France 2007 35 Fort Collins, Colorado, USA 2008 36 Rotterdam, The Netherlands 2009 37 Reims, France 2011 38 Denver, Colorado, USA 2012 39 Valencia, Spain 2013 1st Seminar 1968 index Estes Park, Colorado, USA page 1 Pyro research areas for further exploratory development. Hamrick J T 1 2 Colored smoke signals: castable compositions. Lane G A and Janowiak E 25 M 3 Ignition and output characteristics of pyrotechnics for electro-explosive 39 device applications.
    [Show full text]
  • ATF's Classification of Flash Powder
    Selected Pyrotechnic Publications of K.L. and B.J. Kosanke Part 4 (1995 through 1997) This book contains 138 pages Stars Blown Blind ………………………………………………………………… P. 307-309. Fireworks and their Hazards ……………………………………………………… P. 310-320. Concussion Mortar Internal Pressure, Recoil and Overpressure as Functions of Powder Mass ………………………………………………………… P. 321-332. Hazardous Chemical Combinations ……………………………………………… P. 333-345. Explosive Limit of Armstrong’s Mixture ………………………………………… P. 346-347. Aerial Shell Drift Effects: A) The Effect of Long Mortars B) The Effect of Capsule-Shaped Shells ………………………………………… P. 348-352. Pyrotechnic Spark Generatiom: A Discussion …………………………………… P. 353-365. An Instrument for the Evaluation of Black Powder as a Propellant for Aerial Shells …………………………………………………………………… P. 366-379. Simple Measurements of Aerial Shell Performance ……………………………… P. 380-383. Flash Powder Output Testing: Weak Confinement ……………………………… P. 384-393. New Fast Fuse ……………………………………………………………………… P. 394-396. Burn Rates of Clusters of Gold Sparklers ………………………………………… P. 397-399. ATF’s Classification of Flash Powders …………………………………………… P. 400-401. A Survey of Concussion Powders ………………………………………………… P. 402-414. Sky Rocket Performance Characteristics ………………………………………… P. 415-417. Performance Comparison between Old and New Obron German Dark Aluminum …………………………………………………………. P. 418-419. Pyrotechnic Ignition and Propagation: A Review ……………………………… P. 420-431. Burn Rates of Clusters of Colored Sparklers …………………………………… P. 432-434. An earlier draft appeared in American Fireworks News, No. 160, 1995. Stars Blown Blind K. L. and B. J. Kosanke When an aerial shell bursts, stars that fail to burn are often said to be “blind stars”, or more descriptively as having been “blown blind”. This detracts from the beauty of the shell and contrib- utes to debris fallout. The problem can be caused by any of a combination of factors; the most im- portant of these are the degree of violence of the shell burst and the burn characteristics of the stars.
    [Show full text]