DOCSLIB.ORG

Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle Roman Republican Triumph: Beyond the Spectacle A workshop funded by The Carlsberg Foundation, hosted by The Danish Institute in Rome, Monday the 28 th till Wednesday the 30th of January 2013 This workshop will explore the Roman triumph, focusing mainly on the ways in which it evolved during the Republican period (including Augustus) in response to changing circumstances in Roman society, a society almost constantly engaged in warfare. As is often the case in ancient history, continuity and change and the problematic nature of sources are at the centre of these investigations. The aim is to look at the triumph and its relation to Roman warfare, bringing together various approaches and specialisms. Notwithstanding the current tendency to see Sparta, Rome and Athens as typical rather than exceptional, even when it comes to military matters (Eckstein on Rome, Hodkinson on Sparta and Pritchard on Athens), the triumph remains a specific Roman war ritual, seemingly confirming a Republican culture obsessed with war (what might be described as a militaristic culture). The workshop wishes to revisit the emerging orthodoxy of asking questions about the ritual in its contemporary context, while at the same time being sceptical about the value of searching for 'origins'. This has led to a focus on procession and spectacles, and on the ideology of the Roman triumph (‘cultural history’). This approach has added much valuable knowledge, but the tendency to ask questions about the war ritual mainly in its contemporary context, which naturally tends to focus almost exclusively on periods for which we have contemporary evidence, has unintentionally narrowed the scope of the subject. As a result, a study of the context and development of the Roman Republican triumph is still missing. Imperial writers certainly used republican sources in their writing about the past, and thus rather than simply deconstructing the sources by thorough analysis, we should determine how the evidence can be used, not if it can be used. Even though resent trends have been most visible perhaps in the study of the Roman triumph, this workshop does not wish to ignore other aspects of war rituals, especially in their relation with the 1 triumph. In view of the huge prominence of warfare in Rome, it is hardly a surprise that rituals related to warfare should play an important part in the religious and political life at Rome. Due to the prominence of warfare in Roman life, it would be promising to ask how the triumph related to practical conditions of the Roman state and its continuous state of warfare, and how this imposed on the interactions between the Res Publica and the commanders in the field. This may help to shed new light on and reconstruct Roman attitudes to war. One central aim of the workshop is thus to bring back Roman military history to the forefront of the study of the Roman triumph. A question that has attracted much recent attention is whether there were any rules for obtaining a triumph. Some scholars have been overly sceptical about the possibility of reconstructing customary practises. There is no doubt that there was a fair amount of flexibility and changes over time. In the Middle Republic it was not uncommon for a victory/triumph not to bring an end to the war, which can be observed in the Samnite Wars and the First Punic War. The question remains whether this is true for later periods. Of similar interest is the question as to when the pacification of conquered areas became relevant for the obtaining of a triumph. Roman perceptions of victory should not be isolated from the peace following on from it. Even the Roman triumph, at least in principle, marked the end of a military conflict and the soldiers were brought back to Rome as a symbol of this Roman peace/victory, albeit a Roman peace: peace through war (cf. Res Gestae 13). The emergence of requirements other than winning a victory, however, remains a much neglected part of the study of the development of the Republican triumph. This issue of rules for obtaining a triumph should also be related to the issue of how a victory, and indeed a defeat (defeated commanders do not seem to have had particular disadvantages compared to their victorious peers. Cf. M. Waller, Latomus 70, 2011), was accounted for; how was the number of casualties on the battlefield calculated and by whom. Rome’s relative carelessness towards its own dead certainly suggests that this may often have been impossible to judge. It does seem unfeasible to suggest that a commander underestimated his own victory, or it may just be that usually a significant victory, with substantial enemy losses, was required to obtain a triumph. Many triumphs led to the erection of monuments of one kind or another, first and foremost in Rome. Most commonly these were temples, formally dedicated following battle vows, and with 2 perhaps just one exception (Ap. Claudius Caecus' temple of Bellona) all the vowing generals also celebrated triumphs. There were of course also other monuments, like columnae rostratae , triumphal arches (and later triumphal columns). Some triumphators held post-triumphal games, either instead of or in addition to the monuments. But some did none of these things (and indeed votive temples became less common after ordinary triumphs by the First Century BC). The question remains why some felt it necessary to monumentalize their successes when others did not, seen in the light of a current emphasis on monuments and memory. This is hardly only a question of surpassing the glory of earlier triumphators. Trends are manifold, but it is the aim of this workshop to collate papers on a variety of different periods of Roman history and by using an interdisciplinary approach, to stress the necessity of using both material culture and written evidence in order to answer the questions we pose. The workshop wishes to address the following and similar questions related to the Roman triumph: • continuity and change • problematic evidence • the search for ‘origins’ • rules for obtaining a triumph/Conventions • requirements other than winning a victory • relation to victories in the field and to the victorious and defeated commanders • Roman attitudes to war • battle vows and commemorations in Rome • triumph in relation to other war rituals Speakers and titles: Keynote speaker: Professor John W. Rich, University of Nottingham: 'Towards a History of the Triumph' Head of Department Jesper Carlsen, University of Southern Denmark, Odense: ‘De perfidia? Gn. Domitius Ahenobarbus' Victory and Triumph over the Alloborges’ 3 Dr Matteo Cadario, Università degli Studi di Milano: ‘Preparing for Triumph: Graecae artes as Roman Booty’ Professor Timothy J. Cornell, University of Manchester: 'The Fasti Triumphales and the Historical Tradition' Director Patrick Kragelund, Danmarks Kunstbibliotek: ‘Triumph in the Roman Praetextae, from Naevius to the Octavia’ Assistant Professor Troels Myrup Kristensen, University of Aarhus: ‘Triumph, Trophy Heads, and the Semantics of Violence’ Carlsberg Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellow Carsten H. Lange, The Danish Institute in Rome: ‘The Triumph Outside the City: Voices of Protest in the Middle Republic’ Akademischer Assistent Christoph Lundgreen, TU Dresden: ‘Rules for Obtaining a Triumph’ Associate Professor Jesper M. Madsen, University of Southern Denmark, Odense: 'The Losers Prize: Triumphs in the Mithridatic Wars' Dr Ian Macgregor Morris: ‘The Roman Triumph in the Long Eighteenth Century’ Professor Josiah Osgood, Georgetown University: ‘Julius Caesar and Spanish "triumph-hunting”’ Associate Professor Ida Östenberg, University of Gothenburg: ‘Triumph and Spectacle. Victory Celebrations in the Late Republican Civil Wars’ Professor Marianne Pade, Director, The Danish Institute in Rome: ‘The Neapolitan Triumph of Alfonso d’Aragona’ Professor Christopher J. Smith, Director, The British School at Rome: ‘falsi triumphi’ Lecturer Frederik J. Vervaet, University of Melbourne: ‘Beyond the Spectacle: The Dubious Triumphs of Pompeius Magnus’ Assistant Professor Richard Westall, Pontificia Università Gregoriana, Rome: ‘Triumph and Closure: Between History and Literature’ Organiser: Carlsberg Foundation Postdoctoral Research Fellow Carsten H. Lange, The Danish Institute in Rome: [email protected] 4 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Triumphs of Cilicia and Cicero's Proconsulship
    The Triumphs of Cilicia and Cicero’s Proconsulship Over barely 50 years, at least 9 of the Romans assigned Cilicia requested a triumph and at least 6 received one. Given that many of them had multi-year assignments, this leads to a state of near constant campaigning in southern Asia Minor during the early first century. Even factoring in the conflicts with Mithridates (and perhaps especially then), it is puzzling to see Cilicia as such a volatile province. Clearly, these triumphs did not entail any sort of permanent settlement (see Pittenger 2008). Relying chiefly on the testimony of Cicero, I argue here that Cilicia, which at the time was one of the largest and richest provinces, was also the ideal low-risk province for the triumph-seeker. While triumphal motives have been discussed recently (e.g. Beard 2007, Pittenger 2008), I present Cilicia as an exemplar of typical triumphal machinations. Cicero did not want to be governor of Cilicia. Nevertheless, in some of his letters (ad fam. 2.10 and 8.5), he alludes to the possibility of provoking a fight and attaining a triumph from Cilicia, despite the fact that he arrived as late as he could and left as early as he could. While Cicero’s personal motivations here have also been assessed (see Correa 2013, Wistrand 1979), less is said about the ramifications for the province. Among his other letters, he reveals the activities others, such as Appius Claudius Pulcher, pursued in seeking Cilician triumphs. Hunting for a triumph was not regarded poorly. Cicero rather frankly attributes triumph- hunting to Crassus (cos.
    [Show full text]
  • Contested Triumphs
    chapter 1 Triumphal Decision Making and the SPQR Tacitus’s Annales opens: “From the beginning kings held the city of Rome.”1 If indeed, as both Livy and the Fasti would have it, Romulus and his regal successors also celebrated the earliest triumphs,2 then they did so presum- ably on their own merits and by their own sovereign proclamation, needing no further sanction from anyone else. But under the Republic the situation grew far more complex, as command of Roman armies, and hence the opportunity to become the focus of a victory celebration, passed from the kings to the consuls and dictatores, later joined also by promagistrates and eventually praetors too.3 How then was it determined who deserved to triumph? The answer to this question turns out to be as subtle and multi- layered as the Republican constitution itself. For each recorded triumph, the Fasti Triumphales include the follow- ing: the name of the triumphator (including patronymics and cognomen); the offi ce that he held at the time; a Roman numeral, where appropriate, to mark a second triumph (or third, or fourth, etc.) by the same individ- ual; the name of the enemy over whom he celebrated his victory (marked by de plus the ablative case); and the year (from the founding of the city), the month, and the date when the triumph took place. Although a special 1. Tac. Ann. 1.1: “urbem Romam a principio reges habuere.” 2. For the earliest entries in the Fasti, see Degrassi 1947, 64 – 65, 534 – 35. Livy describes Romulus’s procession to the Capitoline with the spoils of his victory at 1.10.5 but does not call it a triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • Captives of Christ by William Den Hollander
    Captives of Christ By William den Hollander paid visits to various large cities throughout the empire. Triumphs were also often memorialized on public architecture, such as the Arch of Titus in the city of Rome, which 2 Corinthians 2:14 celebrated the victory over the Jews in AD 70. It “But thanks be to God, who always is not surprising, then, that Paul could use this leads us in triumphal procession in technical language for his Corinthian audience. Christ and through us spreads The triumph was an event shared by all under everywhere the fragrance of the Roman sway. knowledge of him.” Before we turn to Paul’s use of this image, however, I’d like to paint a picture in your minds of the supreme spectacle that was the Throughout his epistles, Paul describes his Roman triumph. Prior to the procession relationship as an apostle with Christ in various entering the Triumphal Gate, the city itself was ways. Most familiar is his reference to himself made ready. The temples were thrown open, as a ‘slave/servant of Christ’, found in the festooned with garlands and smoking with opening remarks of most of his letters. incense. The people lined the parade route, Elsewhere he refers to himself as an which wound through or past every building ambassador of Christ, even an ambassador in that could serve as a vantage point for the chains. In the passage above, Paul is also spectators. This was an event. The Jewish speaking about his position as herald of the historian Josephus claims that not a soul could good news.
    [Show full text]
  • Julius Caesar and the Roman Triumph
    The Ancient Roman World Unit Two: The Roman Republic Chapter Eleven: “I Came, I Saw, I Conquered” Julius Caesar and the Roman Triumph Guided Reading Activity – SQ3R pp. 72 - 78 1. How did a coin suggest Caesar be murdered? 2. How did each of the members of the First Triumvirate benefit from their deal? 3. How was Caesar’s relationship with the Senate? Pompey? Ptolemy? Citizens of Rome? 4. Were Caesar’s enemies right to be suspicious of him? 5. What programs did Caesar institute while in power? 6. Why did Caesar pardon his enemies? 7. What role did Brutus play in the end of the Republic? KEY TERMS: embankment, bizarre, omen, soothsayer, legion, brine, placard GRAPHIC ORGANIZER: Create a MURDER REPORT and an OBITUARY NOTICE for Julius Caesar Use the following websites and templates to complete the assignment: http://www.eyewitnesstohistory.com/caesar2.htm http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/caesar/intro.htm MURDER REPORT Full Name Age at death Marital status Appearance Events leading to death Cause of death Persons of interest (Suspects in the case) Reasons for murder Date of Report ________ Report information collected and filed by _____________ How To Write An Obituary Customs and traditions for placing and writing an obituary notice vary depending on religious affiliation, ethnic background or even regionally. You may find it beneficial to look at an obituary notice in your local newspaper to get a better idea of how an obituary notice from your area is written and presented. Obituary Tips The obituary contains specific biographical data about the deceased and information that those wishing to pay respects will need.
    [Show full text]
  • Romans on Parade: Representations of Romanness in the Triumph
    ROMANS ON PARADE: REPRESENTATIONS OF ROMANNESS IN THE TRIUMPH DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfullment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Amber D. Lunsford, B.A., M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2004 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Erik Gunderson, Adviser Professor William Batstone Adviser Professor Victoria Wohl Department of Greek and Latin Copyright by Amber Dawn Lunsford 2004 ABSTRACT We find in the Roman triumph one of the most dazzling examples of the theme of spectacle in Roman culture. The triumph, though, was much more than a parade thrown in honor of a conquering general. Nearly every aspect of this tribute has the feel of theatricality. Even the fact that it was not voluntarily bestowed upon a general has characteristics of a spectacle. One must work to present oneself as worthy of a triumph in order to gain one; military victories alone are not enough. Looking at the machinations behind being granted a triumph may possibly lead to a better understanding of how important self-representation was to the Romans. The triumph itself is, quite obviously, a spectacle. However, within the triumph, smaller and more intricate spectacles are staged. The Roman audience, the captured people and spoils, and the triumphant general himself are all intermeshed into a complex web of spectacle and spectator. Not only is the triumph itself a spectacle of a victorious general, but it also contains sub-spectacles, which, when analyzed, may give us clues as to how the Romans looked upon non-Romans and, in turn, how they saw themselves in relation to others.
    [Show full text]
  • Primary Teacher's Notes 2015-16
    PRIMARY TEACHERS’ NOTES 2015–16 ‘A ROMAN TRIUMPH’, about 1630 Oil on canvas stuck down on oak 86.8 x 163.9 cm PETER PAUL RUBENS © The National Gallery, London © The National Gallery, ABOUT THE ARTIST By all accounts Rubens was a charming and well-loved man with formidable erudition and exceptional energy. Peter Paul Rubens was born in exile in Seigen, Germany This energy is visible in his numerous works which he on 28 June 1577. His Calvinist parents had fled religious executed with the help of his vast studio and which are persecution in their native city of Antwerp. After his father’s characterised by visible brushwork, dynamic compositions death when Rubens was just ten years old, the family and vibrant colouring. returned to Flanders and converted back to Catholicism. Rubens lived and worked at a time of turbulent civil war In 1630, at the age of 53, Rubens married again. To and religious turmoil. In adulthood, he became both a everyone’s surprise he did not marry into the nobility, but respected diplomat helping to broker peace and a celebrated chose Helene Fourment, the 16 year-old daughter of a artist, developing the new style of Baroque painting that respectable merchant family. Rubens was clearly bowled championed the Catholic Counter Reformation. over by his new wife with whom he has five children, and she figures in numerous portraits, including a version of Having received a humanist education, learning Latin and ‘The Judgement of Paris’ in which she appears as Venus. the Classics, Rubens began his career aged thirteen as a court page to the Countess Marguerite de Ligne.
    [Show full text]
  • Mary Beard, the Roman Triumph. Cambridge, MA
    2009.08.02009.08.04444 Mary Beard, The Roman Triumph . Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. PressPress,, 2007. Pp. 434.434. ISBN 978978––––0000––––674674674674––––026130261302613––––1111.... Reviewed by Benjamin M. Sullivan, The American School of Classical Studies at Athens and TTTheThe UnUnUniUn iiiversityversity of California, Irvine (bsulliva@uc([email protected])i.edu)i.edu).... The triumph (Latin triumphus ) was the Roman victory ritual par excellence , its celebration the greatest height to which a political Roman of the Republic could aspire. With captives and plunder on display and accompanied by a formidable retinue, a general who had led his army to victory in a major battle entered the city of Rome by the “Triumphal Gate” (used exclusively for the purpose) and processed through its streets to the Temple of Jupiter on the Capitol. Strange rites, the origins of which were already obscure by the late republican period, awed spectators and participants alike: clothed in elaborate, archaic costume, the general held a laurel branch in one hand and an ivory scepter in the other while his soldiers chanted insulting or obscene songs to ward off evil. Standing behind him in his chariot, a slave held a golden crown over his head and whispered, “look behind you; remember that you are mortal.” In The Roman Triumph , Mary Beard attempts to revise every element of the standard scholarly reconstruction of the triumph, often 1 radically. Professor of Classics at Cambridge University and a renowned student of Roman religion, she is as qualified as anyone now writing in English to undertake the task. That said, readers of MWSR should be aware at the outset that her book is not primarily a military historical study but an account of an important Roman ritual in its political, social, and cultural milieux.
    [Show full text]
  • Killing Romans: Legitimizing Violence in Cicero and Caesar by Jacqueline
    Killing Romans: Legitimizing Violence in Cicero and Caesar by Jacqueline J. Stimson A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (Classical Studies) in The University of Michigan 2017 Doctoral Committee: Professor David S. Potter, Chair Professor Jane Chaplin, Middlebury College Professor Arlene W. Saxonhouse Professor Celia E. Schultz Jacqueline J. Stimson [email protected] ORCID iD: 0000-0002-6443-5236 © Jacqueline J. Stimson 2017 Meis Parentibus ii Acknowledgements As overwhelming as the dissertation process is, I am extremely lucky to have had the help of so many wonderful and thoughtful people. First, I owe the greatest debt of gratitude to my adviser, David Potter, for his time, energy, and constant encouragement. In the beginning, he knew when to let me find my way in the darkness, even when it seemed like all I was finding were dead ends, and when to gently nudge me in a productive direction. Throughout, he has been an endless fount of knowledge and scholarship, and unfailingly supportive of my ideas. I have learned so much from him, not only about Roman history, but also the art of articulating and refining arguments. I am also thankful for my other committee members, Celia Schultz, Arlene Saxonhouse, and Jane Chaplin. My dissertation as a whole is stronger because of my meetings with them and their attentive feedback on chapters. They have helped me go outside my comfort zone into new areas of research and exploration, and I am grateful for their support. The resources at the University of Michigan that are free and open to all graduate students are unparalleled.
    [Show full text]
  • 1. the Flavian Triumph and the Arch of Titus: the Jewish God in Flavian Rome1
    1. The Flavian Triumph and the Arch of Titus: The Jewish God in Flavian Rome1 Introduction In 70 CE the Roman forces besieging Jerusalem gained control of the city and destroyed the Jewish temple.2 The emperor Vespasian (r. 69 CE – 79 CE) and his son Titus (r. 79 CE – 81 CE), who served as general at the siege, were awarded a joint triumph to celebrate the victory over the Jews in Judaea. Celebrated in 71 CE, the Flavian3 triumph is described by the Jewish historian, Josephus (37 CE – c. 100 CE), who may have been an eye witness to the procession. This same triumphal procession is depicted on a monument known as the Arch of Titus, located on the Via Sacra in Rome. It was probably dedicated around 81, early in the reign of Domitian (r. 81 CE – 96 CE), brother and heir to Titus.4 In this paper I investigate the ways that ritual and monument bring the Jewish god from the edge of the empire into the imperial capital, and how ritual and monument construct a Flavian dynastic identity. Ritual and Space: The Flavian Triumph A triumph is a ritual that celebrates a spectacular Roman victory. Awarded by a vote of the Senate to a general who had defeated an enemy army with an exceptionally large count of enemies killed, a the ritual of the triumph included special prayers, a procession, sacrifices to Jupiter Optimus Maximus (the highest god of the Roman pantheon) and sometimes the execution of captured enemy leaders.5 Triumphal processions were an important aspect of the creation and expression of Roman collective identity, celebrating the military might of the Roman people.
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline and Fall of the Ancient Triumph
    This is a repository copy of The decline and fall of the ancient triumph. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/110308/ Book Section: Halsall, Guy Richard William orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-4355 (2017) The decline and fall of the ancient triumph. In: Goldbeck, Fabian and Weinand, Johannes, (eds.) Der römische Triumph in Prinzipat und Spätantike. Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter , Berlin , pp. 555-68. Reuse Items deposited in White Rose Research Online are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved unless indicated otherwise. They may be downloaded and/or printed for private study, or other acts as permitted by national copyright laws. The publisher or other rights holders may allow further reproduction and re-use of the full text version. This is indicated by the licence information on the White Rose Research Online record for the item. Takedown If you consider content in White Rose Research Online to be in breach of UK law, please notify us by emailing [email protected] including the URL of the record and the reason for the withdrawal request. [email protected] https://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/ Guy Halsall The Decline and Fall of the Ancient Triumph Abstract: This chapter argues that although victory remained absolutely central to royal ideals and imagery, there was a crucial change between the late Roman and the early medieval western worlds. Though key features remained (processions etc.) there was a decisive shift of emphasis towards Christian celebration presided over by the church; towards thanksgiving rather than praise; and towards Old Testament imagery.
    [Show full text]
  • The Roman Triumph Free Download
    THE ROMAN TRIUMPH FREE DOWNLOAD Mary Beard | 448 pages | 07 Apr 2010 | HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS | 9780674032187 | English | Cambridge, Mass., United States Roman triumph In 71 BCE, Crassus earned an ovation for quashing the Spartacus revolt, and increased his honours by wearing a crown of Jupiter's "triumphal" laurel. Tarquin has two triumphs in the Fasti but none in Dionysius. She had thought of going to King's, but rejected it when she discovered the college did not offer scholarships to women. How can we piece together its elusive traces in art and literature? I wonder if the negative reviews on Amazon are The Roman Triumph result of a mis-targeting of this books for a 'general' audience when it actually engages with, and is sited within, academic arguments that are of pressing interest to history and classics scholars? To put it another way, this book weakens false knowledge, but promotes deeper understanding. Community Reviews. Print Cite. Views Read Edit View history. The Roman Triumph Rome: Life and Art. Prior to this, the senate voted Titus a triple-arch at the Circus Maximus to celebrate or commemorate the same victory or triumph. Witschel eds. Next in line, all on foot, came Rome's senators and magistrates, followed by the general's lictors in their red war-robes, their fasces wreathed in laurel, then the general in his four-horse chariot. There is good info here, but it focused on an element of Rome that I wasn't The Roman Triumph that interested in myself. Or when Pompey's elephants got stuck trying to squeeze through an arch? It's pretty remarkable how flimsy our foundation of knowledge is for something as I would have thought The Roman Triumph and straight-forward as the ceremony of the triumph.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nobility and the City of Rome
    THE NOBILITY AND THE CITY OF ROME The opening of offices and priesthoods to plebeians that occurred during the fourth and third centuries resulted in the formation of a new governing elite in g rc} V Rome with a distinctive way of life. This elite, collectively known as the “nobles” or nobiles, would govern Rome and its empire throughout the period of expansion in the third, second, and first centuries. Archaic Rome had been governed by rel atively few individuals from a small group of families. However, the city’s new leadership, also a group of limited size, would differ from the old in significant ways. The patriciate was always an aristocracy of birth. Membership in certain families itself sufficed to grant patricians their place in the city and the associated privileges. In addition, especially prominent leaders of the Archaic period pos sessed personal military followings that gave them a political importance regard less of whether or not they held any formal political office. Although some patri cian families would achieve prominent places in the new elite, too, this elite was not an aristocracy of birth, nor did its leading members possess significant mili tary forces of their own. Instead, individuals and families had to establish and maintain their place in the city. Officeholding was central. The new nobility rested on its members’ ability to win offices and gain priesthoods. In this context, it was above all the magistracies that a man held which defined him as well as his family. Indeed, the Latin word nobilis, in its most restricted sense, designates an individual with an ancestor who had been chosen consul.
    [Show full text]