DOCSLIB.ORG

Vilan: Israel After Olmert, with Livni Rising

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Vilan: Israel After Olmert, with Livni Rising Vilan: Israel after Olmert, with Livni rising Meretz USA had a lunch program with MK Avshalom Vilan (affectionately known as Abu) on Wednesday, Sept. 17, the day of the Kadima party leadership primary. Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni narrowly defeated Transportation Minister Shaul Mofaz (the latter is a former armed forces chief of staff and an ex-defense minister) along with Avi Dichter and Meir Sheetrit, two other cabinet ministers who trailed badly. Abu is skeptical about Livni because he sees her as too cautious to really deliver progress toward peace. A case in point, he reports, is that Livni did nothing in favor of the Knesset bill he is co-sponsoring with Colette Avital for the government to offer to buy the homes of thousands of settlers living in West Bank settlements beyond the security/separation barrier. He knows that a good 40,000 or more of these 80,000 settlers (those east of the barrier) are desperate to leave the West Bank if they can retrieve enough equity from their homes to buy new domiciles in Israel proper. As it is now, their locations in front of the fence/wall has rendered their properties nearly worthless on the open market, leaving these families without the economic means to return to Israel. Livni has indicated to Abu that she would support such a measure after an agreement with the Palestinians, but this misses the point: Abu and Avital’s bill would facilitate negotiations by easing tensions and peacefully dismantling settlements. The vicissitudes of Israeli politics are such that he speculated that (unless he is indicted) Ehud Olmert could remain as caretaker prime minister until as late as May. Complications would emerge if Livni cannot pull together a new coalition within 42 days (not counting the High Holy Days and Sukkot), meaning that an election would be scheduled in the following three months – probably in March – and then another 42 days (perhaps interrupted by Passover) for the winner to put together his or her coalition. Going against the grain, he argued that – since the disastrous conduct of the Hezbollah war in the summer of 2006 – Olmert has actually been a fairly good prime minister in moving the peace process forward on the Palestinian and Syrian fronts. (Knowing Abu, I’m sure he deplores the settlement activities planned for East Jerusalem and environs in recent months.) When asked, Abu reminded the audience that Israel has no real military option against Iran’s nuclear program, because Iran’s program is distributed among about 60 sites, requiring a sustained air campaign that Israel does not have the capacity to mount. He estimated that Israel would need an air force ten times larger than it has. He also believes that Israel should not be so confrontational regarding Iran; he sees this issue as an international problem requiring international efforts at a solution. Livni’s main and now defeated competitor in Kadima, Mofaz (born in Iran) has been especially hawkish in his utterances, while Livni has been quoted as saying that Israel can live with a nuclear Iran. Abu acknowledges that Israel could benefit from Livni’s moderate impulses regarding the employment of Israel’s military. In the meantime, Abu identifies Iran as funding the tunnels from Egypt, where arms and explosives, as well as some civilian goods, are being smuggled into the Gaza Strip. His remedy would be for Israel to settle things diplomatically with Syria, and for Syria to disengage from its alliance with Iran and to stop supporting Hamas’s armed wing as part of an arrangement with Israel. I asked Abu about his opinion on reforming the electoral system to eliminate the bad effects of Israel’s extreme form of proportional representation (PR). He said that he favors an increase in the vote threshold to “2.5%” or the number of votes needed to elect at least three MKs instead of the current two (actually, not a precise figure, because votes for party lists that don’t exceed the threshold are discounted). He also said that PR represents a core value of Israeli democracy because it allows every sector of Israeli society to have a voice. Moreover, raising the threshold further would endanger Agudat Yisrael – the Ashkenazi ultra-Orthodox and also the Arabs. He’s more concerned about the three Arab parties, because a threshold of 4-5% could wipe them out. In his opinion, there are too many differences among the Arab parties for them to combine into a single list..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Freedom in the World 2019
    Freedom in the World 2019 https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2019/israel A. ELECTORAL PROCESS: 12 / 12 A1. Was the current head of government or other chief national authority elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 A largely ceremonial president is elected by the Knesset for one seven-year term. In 2014, Reuven Rivlin of the right-leaning Likud party was elected to replace outgoing president Shimon Peres, receiving 63 votes in a runoff against Meir Sheetrit of the centrist Hatnuah party. The prime minister is usually the leader of the largest faction in the Knesset. In 2014, in a bid to create more stable governing coalitions, the electoral threshold for parties to win representation was raised from 2 percent to 3.25 percent, and the no- confidence procedure was revised so that opponents hoping to oust a sitting government must simultaneously vote in a new one. The incumbent prime minister in 2018, Benjamin Netanyahu of the conservative party Likud, had been in office since 2009, most recently securing reelection after the 2015 parliamentary polls. A2. Were the current national legislative representatives elected through free and fair elections? 4 / 4 Members of the 120-seat Knesset are elected by party-list proportional representation for four-year terms, and elections are typically free and fair. In the 2015 contest, Likud secured 30 seats, followed by the center-left Zionist Union with 24. The Joint List—a coalition of parties representing Arab citizens of Israel, who often identify as Palestinian—earned 13 seats; the centrist Yesh Atid (There Is a Future), 11; Kulanu, also centrist, 10; Habayit Hayehudi (Jewish Home), 8; the ultra- Orthodox parties Shas and United Torah Judaism, 7 and 6, respectively; the right- wing Yisrael Beiteinu, 6; and the left-wing Meretz party, 5.
    [Show full text]
  • Caesarea Forum - Xvii
    CAESAREA FORUM - XVII PROGRAM Chair: Dr. Yuval Steinitz, Minister of Finance Academic Director of the Forum: Mr. David Brodet Wednesday and Thursday, 1st -2nd July 2009 Hotel Royal Beach, Eilat WEDNESDAY, 1st JULY 2009 8:30 - 9:30 Registration and assembly 9:30 - 13:00 First Session : "The Requisite Size of the Government - between Economy and Politics" [The Olive and Acacia Hall] Presentation of the Team's Recommendations: Prof. Joseph Zeira , Department of Economics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Presenters: Prof. Avishai Braverman, Minister of Minority Affairs Mr. Yoram Ariav , Director General and Acting Head of the Budget Department, Ministry of Finance Prof. Zvi Eckstein , Deputy Governor, Bank of Israel Dr. Michel Strawczynski, Director, Macro-Economic and Policy Department, Bank of Israel Prof. Omer Moav, Department of Economics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem Prof. Manuel Trajtenberg , Head, National Economic Council, Prime Minister's Office Ms. Yael Andorn, Director General, Amitim Pension Funds Dr. Yossi Bachar , Economic Consulting and Business Development Ltd. Dr. Eldad Shidlovsky , Head, Economics and Research Department, Ministry of Finance Plenary discussion 13:00 - 14:15 Minister of Finance's Session : [The Ranch House Restaurant] Luncheon Address by the Dr. Yuval Steinitz, Minister of Finance 14:30 - 18:15 Second Session : "The Future of Growth Promotion in Israel: A Return to Boosting Avant-garde Industries and Scientific Technological Innovation" [The Olive and Acacia Hall] 14:30-16:30 Presentation of the Team's Recommendations: Prof. Arnon Bentor, Dean, Civil and Environmental Engineering Faculty, and Senior Researcher, The Neaman Institute, The Technion Presenters: Mr. Eli Hurvitz, Chairman, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.
    [Show full text]
  • How and Why Did Ariel Sharon Become Prime Minister and How Did the Politics Violence Impact on His Electoral Success in 2001?
    BEN-GURION UNIVERSITY OF THE NEGEV FACULTY OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS AND GOVERNMENT HOW AND WHY DID ARIEL SHARON BECOME PRIME MINISTER AND HOW DID THE POLITICS VIOLENCE IMPACT ON HIS ELECTORAL SUCCESS IN 2001? THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS JENNFER SCHARFSTEIN UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF: BECKY KOOK ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR AND DORON SHULTZINER, LECTURER DECEMBER 2013 1 Abstract There are two questions that are examined in the thesis. They are: Why and how did Ariel Sharon become Prime Minister? How did the political violence impact on his electoral success in 2001? When looking at these questions there are a few specific events that had a significant impact on Sharon and the election. The main event is the second Intifada, and the perception of violence that went along with it. Public opinion of Sharon was slowly shifting prior to the elections, and by the time the vote came around, there had been daily violence for months, and people were ready for a change. There are three main theories within the literature that can help explain, at least from the aspect of the electorate, how Sharon came into power. The first theory states that the electorate will vote against the party, or person, in powers, regardless if they are right-wing or left-wing. The second theory outlines a polarization that will take place, whereby the electorate is forced further to the right or left, depending on where their political allegiance laid previously. The final they discussed is one in which there is a shift to the right.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As Of, January 27, 2015) Elections • in Israel, Elections for the Knesset A
    Israel and Overseas: Israeli Election Primer 2015 (As of, January 27, 2015) Elections In Israel, elections for the Knesset are held at least every four years. As is frequently the case, the outgoing government coalition collapsed due to disagreements between the parties. As a result, the Knesset fell significantly short of seeing out its full four year term. Knesset elections in Israel will now be held on March 17, 2015, slightly over two years since the last time that this occurred. The Basics of the Israeli Electoral System All Israeli citizens above the age of 18 and currently in the country are eligible to vote. Voters simply select one political party. Votes are tallied and each party is then basically awarded the same percentage of Knesset seats as the percentage of votes that it received. So a party that wins 10% of total votes, receives 10% of the seats in the Knesset (In other words, they would win 12, out of a total of 120 seats). To discourage small parties, the law was recently amended and now the votes of any party that does not win at least 3.25% of the total (probably around 130,000 votes) are completely discarded and that party will not receive any seats. (Until recently, the “electoral threshold,” as it is known, was only 2%). For the upcoming elections, by January 29, each party must submit a numbered list of its candidates, which cannot later be altered. So a party that receives 10 seats will send to the Knesset the top 10 people listed on its pre-submitted list.
    [Show full text]
  • Gaza Continues to Bedevil Israel
    Gaza Continues to Bedevil Israel Last Saturday night, in another of the truly bleak developments emanating from the Gaza Strip and western Negev desert, a Qassam rocket fired from northern Gaza hit the town of Sderot, seriously wounding an 8 year-old boy and moderately wounding his 19 year-old brother. The next day, in a fit of pique, Interior Minister Meir Sheetrit of Kadima, a man who aspires to one day become Israel’s Prime Minister, let loose the following reaction at a meeting of the Cabinet: “Any other country would have already gone in and leveled the area, which is exactly what I think the IDF should do – decide on a neighborhood in Gaza and level it… We should let them know ‘you have to leave, this area will be taken down tomorrow’ and just take it down – that will show them we mean business.” Although given on occasion to such tempestuous outbursts, Sheetrit, on the whole, has traditionally been one of the more sober politicians to emerge from his alma mater party, the Likud. Clearly the Israeli government’s chronic inability to put an end to the low-intensity warfare in and around the Gaza Strip has many Israeli politicians befuddled, confounded, bedeviled, and groping for answers. Over the last weeks and months, the Israeli government has employed a variety of means – military, economic and diplomatic – to try and stop the incessant rocket fire. To date, not one of them has lived up to the government’s promises. Targeted killings have eliminated scores of Hamas operatives, but they’ve taken the lives of innocent civilians as well and haven’t produced any letup.
    [Show full text]
  • The Twentieth Knesset
    Unofficial Translation Internal Number: 578022 The Twentieth Knesset Initiators: Knesset Members David Bitan Uri Maklev Yoav Ben-Tzur Bezalel Smotrich Yoav Kish Eli Cohen Sharren Haskel Robert Ilatov Yair Lapid Nava Boker Nissan Slomiansky Avi Dichter Yaakov Peri Meir Cohen Makhlouf “Miki” Zohar Anat Berko Nurit Koren Mickey Levy Aliza Lavie ______________________________________________________ P/20/2808 Bill for the Entry into Israel Law (Amendment – Cancellation of Visa and Permanent Residence Permits of Terrorists and their Families after their Participation in Terrorist Activities) – 2016 [5776] Amendment of Article 11 1. In Article 11 of the Entry into Israel Law of 19521 [5712], the following should be stipulated after sub-section (b): 1 Statutes Book of the [Hebrew] year 5712 [extends from 1 October 1951 until 19 September 1952], Page 146. Unofficial Translation “(c) Without undermining what was mentioned in sub-section (a), the Minister of the Interior is entitled to cancel the visa and permanent residence permit of any person who commits a terrorist act (as defined by this law) against the State of Israel and its citizens; provided that he would not cancel any visa or permanent residence permit before giving the person the chance to plead and state his/her claims before him. (d) Without undermining what was mentioned in sub-section (a), the Minister of the Interior is entitled to cancel the visa or permanent residence permit of the relative of a person who performs a terrorist act or contributes to it (whether through an act or by knowledge) before, during or after the undertaking of that act; provided that the Minister would not cancel any visa or permanent residence permit before giving the terrorist’s relative the chance to plead and state his/her claims before him.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel and the Middle East News Update
    Israel and the Middle East News Update Friday, May 15 Headlines: ● Netanyahu Postpones Government Swearing-In Until Sunday ● Peretz Joins New Gov’t as Minister of Jerusalem Affairs ● Bibi, Gantz Will ‘Take a While’ to Decide on Annexation ● Senate Legislation Seeks to Lessen Dependence on China ● EU Condemns Hate Speech in Palestinian Textbooks ● Palestinians Vow to Foil Annexation and Trump Plan ● Clashes Erupt in Wadi Ara Over Sheba Stabber's Death ● Netanyahu Orders Opening of Schools in 'Safe' Areas Commentary: ● Israel Hayom: “Politicians Can Scent Weakness from Afar” − By Matti Tuchfeld ● Ma’ariv: “Tar and Feather” − By Ben Caspit S. Daniel Abraham Center for Middle East Peace 633 Pennsylvania Ave. NW, 5th Floor, Washington, DC 20004 The Hon. Robert Wexler, President News Excerpts May 15, 2020 Ynet News Likud Rebellion Delays Knesset Swearing-In Prime Minister Netanyahu delayed the swearing-in of the new government, just hours before it was due to take place, until Sunday. The prime minister has not yet finalized a new position for seven of his close supporters most of whom were ministers in his recent cabinet. A significant portion of the posts have not yet been filled, leaving responsibility for budgets worth tens of billions of shekels to last-minute horse trading. "It's stuck with some of the ministries. Netanyahu has yet to reach a deal with Yoav Galant, Ze'ev Elkin, Nir Barkat, Gila Gamliel, Tzipi Hotoveli, David Amsalem and Avi Dichter," Likud officials said. The former Shin Bet chief told his associates: "Such disrespect is not shown only to me, but spits in the face of 130,000 Likud officials who elected me to the top 10 of the Likud." Blue & White leader Benny Gantz agreed to the delay in order to give Netanyahu more time to allocate cabinet posts to those Likud members, a joint statement said.
    [Show full text]
  • Frenchman's Creek
    itinerary April 29-May 6, 2019 Frenchman’s Creek mission inside the idf Chairs: Judith & Morry Weiss Judy & Paul Konigsberg Penni & Steve Weinberg Monday, April 29 Welcome dinner with the former IDF Chief of Staff OVERNIGHT: HILTON TEL AVIV Tuesday, April 30 Breakfast at the hotel Ride a helicopter from Tel Aviv’s airport toward Jerusalem; ride along the security fence between Israel and the West Bank; then head north over Tiberias and land on the Golan Heights. Hear a briefing on the most advanced technology and challenges the IDF uses for Hezbollah and other radical movements operating close to the border. Travel via helicopter to Ziv hospital in Tzfat Since the outbreak of the Syrian Civil War in January 2014, the hospital has been treating Syrians injured in the fighting. An estimated $9 million has been invested in treating Syrian refugees alone. The Israel Defense Forces and Israeli government cover two-thirds of the cost, and a third is covered by the hospital. Lunch with Ilan Shohat, mayor of Tzfat, a city in Federation’s Partnership2Gether Region Visit Havat Hashomer Base and meet the base commander, female commanders and IDF soldiers. Havat Hashomer takes in soldiers who are considered at-risk youth. The mission of the base is to advance the individual’s education and fulfill his or her potential for the success of each soldier and citizen in general. Each soldier develops military and life skills, as well as a sense of personal capability and accomplishment. Travel to Tel Aviv via Helicopter Special dinner party with FIDF IMPACT! Scholarship Students FIDF IMPACT! Scholarships are given to select IDF combat and combat-support veterans who qualify for post-secondary education but cannot afford to pay for it.
    [Show full text]
  • Israel's Struggle Against Hamas
    Università degli Studi “Roma Tre” Scuola Dottorale in Scienze Politiche XXV Ciclo Israel’s Struggle Against Hamas Supervisore Dottorando Prof. Leopoldo Nuti Niccolò Petrelli Coordinatore della Sezione Prof. Leopoldo Nuti Introduction The PhD research, ‘Israel’s Struggle against Hamas: Strategic Culture, Adaptation and War’, studies the impact of cultural factors on the Israeli counter-insurgency vis-à-vis Hamas in the period comprised between 1987 and 2005, analyzing to what extent the peculiar traits of the Israeli approach to security and military affairs account for the shaping of a distinct ‘way of war’ and for the successes and failures of the Jewish state in countering the Islamic Resistance Movement’s insurgency. The concept of ‘counter-insurgency’ is logically contingent on that of ‘insurgency’, to which it applies. Being insurgency a protracted struggle to control a contested political space conducted by one or more popularly based non-state challengers1, ‘counter-insurgency’ could be defined as all those measures through which elements of national power are applied for the purpose of suppressing an insurgency. From this definition it appears clear how the concept constitutes an analytical paradigm through which scholars and practitioners approach asymmetric warfare (or war against ‘irregulars’, ‘partisans’ or ‘guerrillas’), that is struggles between non-state and state actors.2 Although old as human civilization, asymmetric warfare rose to prominence after 1945, coming to represent the norm, rather than the exception, of war.3 The end of the Cold War and the last two decades seemed to confirm the ascendancy of this specific kind of warfare over ‘conventional’ or ‘symmetric warfare’ and the setting of a pattern that will probably continue for some time.4 Counter-insurgency represents therefore a topic worth to study not only by virtue of its prominence in the history of warfare, but also in light of the nature of the conflicts confronting the international community, either currently and possibly also in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • The IDF in the Second Intifada
    Volume 13 | No. 3 | October 2010 A Decade since the Outbreak of the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Strategic Overview | Michael Milstein The IDF in the Second Intifada | Giora Eiland The Rise and Fall of Suicide Bombings in the Second Intifada | Yoram Schweitzer The Political Process in the Entangled Gordian Knot | Anat Kurz The End of the Second Intifada? | Jonathan Schachter The Second Intifada and Israeli Public Opinion | Yehuda Ben Meir and Olena Bagno-Moldavsky The Disengagement Plan: Vision and Reality | Zaki Shalom Israel’s Coping with the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Critical Review | Ephraim Lavie 2000-2010: An Influential Decade |Oded Eran Resuming the Multilateral Track in a Comprehensive Peace Process | Shlomo Brom and Jeffrey Christiansen The Core Issues of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Fifth Element | Shiri Tal-Landman המכון למחקרי ביטחון לאומי THE INSTITUTE FOR NATIONAL SECURcITY STUDIES INCORPORATING THE JAFFEE bd CENTER FOR STRATEGIC STUDIES Strategic ASSESSMENT Volume 13 | No. 3 | October 2010 CONteNts Abstracts | 3 A Decade since the Outbreak of the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Strategic Overview | 7 Michael Milstein The IDF in the Second Intifada | 27 Giora Eiland The Rise and Fall of Suicide Bombings in the Second Intifada | 39 Yoram Schweitzer The Political Process in the Entangled Gordian Knot | 49 Anat Kurz The End of the Second Intifada? | 63 Jonathan Schachter The Second Intifada and Israeli Public Opinion | 71 Yehuda Ben Meir and Olena Bagno-Moldavsky The Disengagement Plan: Vision and Reality | 85 Zaki Shalom Israel’s Coping with the al-Aqsa Intifada: A Critical Review | 101 Ephraim Lavie 2000-2010: An Influential Decade | 123 Oded Eran Resuming the Multilateral Track in a Comprehensive Peace Process | 133 Shlomo Brom and Jeffrey Christiansen The Core Issues of the Israeli–Palestinian Conflict: The Fifth Element | 141 Shiri Tal-Landman The purpose of Strategic Assessment is to stimulate and Strategic enrich the public debate on issues that are, or should be, ASSESSMENT on Israel’s national security agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Eve of Palestinian Elections: Israel and Palestinians Enter a New Era by David Makovsky
    MENU Policy Analysis / PolicyWatch 536 On the Eve of Palestinian Elections: Israel and Palestinians Enter a New Era by David Makovsky Jan 25, 2006 ABOUT THE AUTHORS David Makovsky David Makovsky is the Ziegler distinguished fellow at The Washington Institute and director of the Koret Project on Arab-Israel Relations. Brief Analysis n January 19, 2006, Khalil Shikaki and David Makovsky addressed The Washington Institute's Special Policy O Forum. Dr. Shikaki is director of the Palestinian Center for Policy and Survey Research, an associate professor of political science at an-Najah University in Nablus, and a senior fellow at the Crown Center for Middle Eastern Studies at Brandeis University. Mr. Makovsky, senior fellow and director of the Project on the Middle East Peace Process at The Washington Institute, is author of the Institute monograph Engagement through Disengagement: Gaza and the Potential for Israeli-Palestinian Peacemaking. The following is a rapporteur's summary of their remarks. KHALIL SHIKAKI On the eve of the Palestinian legislative elections, Fatah maintains only the slightest of leads over Hamas, a scenario which would have been unimaginable one year ago. Since Yasser Arafat's death in November 2004, Hamas has increased its strength by 40 percent, while in the same period Fatah has only increased its support by 10 percent. Hamas's success is the result of three major factors: 1) The continued infighting between Fatah's old guard and its young guard has fragmented the party, allowing Hamas to gain valuable ground. During the 1990s, the old guard not only failed to deliver on their promises, they also refused effectively to incorporate the young guard within the party.
    [Show full text]
  • Chair's Report on the 41St EP-Knesset
    Delegation for Relations with Israel REPORT by Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO Chair of the delegation 41st EP/Knesset Interparliamentary Meeting Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, Israel 16 - 18 November 2015 1. BACKGROUND 8 Members of the European Parliament's Delegation for relations with Israel, headed by Fulvio Martusciello (EPP/IT), conducted a working visit to Jerusalem and Tel Aviv, Israel, from 16-18 November 2015 in the framework of the 41st Interparliamentary Meeting between the European Parliament and the Knesset. Discussions between Members of the European Parliament and the Knesset took place in an open and frank atmosphere and focussed on EU-Israel relations, in particular the 'interpretative notice on indication of origin of goods from the territories occupied by Israel since June 1967', the Israeli-Palestinian conflict and the escalation of violence in Jerusalem and elsewhere, the Iran nuclear deal and the current security challenges in the Middle East. The delegation also met experts of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and of 'The Israel Project' and visited a start-up company in Tel Aviv, where it was briefed on the Israeli entrepreneurship and innovation ecosystem. The delegation was composed by Fulvio MARTUSCIELLO, chair (EPP, IT), Olga SEHNALOVA, 1st vice- chair (CZ, S&D), Bastiaan BELDER, 2nd vice-chair (NL, ECR), Miltiadis KYRKOS (EL, S&D), Costas MAVRIDES (CY, S&D), Marijana PETIR (HR, EPP), Branislav ŠKRIPEK (SK, ECR), and Ramon TREMOSA i BALCELLS, (ES, ALDE). 2. POLITICAL MEETINGS a) Briefing by H.E. Ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen, Head of the EU Delegation to Israel, 16 November 2015, Jerusalem The visit started with a briefing by Ambassador Lars Faaborg-Andersen, Head of the EU Delegation to Israel, who informed Members about the latest developments in Israel and gave an overview of the state of EU-Israel relations, which he described as strong and solid, marked by very close political, economic and cultural ties.
    [Show full text]