DOCSLIB.ORG

Jesus: a Short Life: the Historical Evidence Pdf, Epub, Ebook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Jesus: a Short Life: the Historical Evidence Pdf, Epub, Ebook JESUS: A SHORT LIFE: THE HISTORICAL EVIDENCE PDF, EPUB, EBOOK John Dickson | 160 pages | 18 May 2012 | Lion Hudson Plc | 9780745955780 | English | Oxford, United Kingdom Jesus: a Short Life: The Historical Evidence PDF Book Ancient Evidence for Jesus from Non-Christian Sources Although there is overwhelming evidence that the New Testament is an accurate and trustworthy historical document, many people are still reluctant to believe what it says unless there is also some independent, non-biblical testimony that corroborates its statements. What Language Did Jesus Speak? Editor's choice. Why ought the others, because of these acts, to be accounted wicked rather than this man, seeing they have him as their witness against himself? Lucian of Samosata was a second century Greek satirist. Christian politicians should remember that Brad Chilcott. This video examines the historical evidence for the life of Jesus, including discussion of the non-biblical evidence. In the case of the Talmud, the earliest period of compilation occurred between A. Mykytiuk agrees with most scholars that Christian scribes modified portions of the passage but did not insert it wholesale into the text. Fowler, 4 vols. What can we learn from this ancient and rather unsympathetic reference to Jesus and the early Christians? The documents produced by Christian, Jewish and Roman writers form the most significant evidence. Another line of evidence establishing the historicity of Jesus is the fact that the earliest enemies of the Christian faith did not deny that Christ actually lived see Hurst , It claims He practiced sorcery and enticed Israel to apostasy! Harrison, E. Even me. What Does the Bible Say? Celsus, a pagan philosopher of the second century A. Second, their worship was directed to Christ, demonstrating that they firmly believed in His divinity. Jesus: A Story of Enlightenment [] Very little is known or recorded about Jesus in his formative years. While some disputed the existence of ancient Nazareth, his biblical childhood home town, archaeologists have unearthed a rock-hewn courtyard house along with tombs and a cistern. Conclusion Let's summarize what we've learned about Jesus from this examination of ancient non-Christian sources. John Dickson looks honestly at this question and gives some compelling answers. Why did Jesus have to die on the cross? For many scholars, Revelation offers a clue that Jesus's skin was a darker hue and that his hair was woolly in texture. Archaeologists, though, have been able to corroborate elements of the New Testament story of Jesus. They were in the habit of meeting on a certain fixed day before it was light, when they sang in alternate verses a hymn to Christ, as to a god, and bound themselves by a solemn oath, not to any wicked deeds, but never to commit any fraud, theft or adultery, never to falsify their word, nor deny a trust when they should be called upon to deliver it up; after which it was their custom to separate, and then reassemble to partake of food — but food of an ordinary and innocent kind. How controversial is the existence of Jesus now? The Early Christian Fathers. Adrian Holloway examines the question of how sure we can be that Jesus really rose from the dead. The passage also tells us why Jesus was crucified. People often question things today. Indeed, "as Schlomo Pines and David Flusser This title offers an up-to-date picture of Jesus of Nazareth, highlighting the problems and pitfalls encountered in such a venture, and including a su…. In the nineteenth century, German historian Bruno Baur alleged that Jesus was the mental invention of a few second-century Christians who were influenced by Graeco-Roman philosophy. This is a must-read for anyone wanting a lucid response to the controversial conspiracy theories of the post-modern age. Comments Required. Jesus: a Short Life: The Historical Evidence Writer Recent claims about the life of Jesus have raised many questions about the historicity of the man from Nazareth. Categories : Historiography of Jesus Christ myth theory Historicity of religious figures Historical controversies Historicity of the Bible. But at least in the first four bullet points above, the Bible is emphatic that they were not merely visions. While there he was arrested, tried, and executed. This is a crucial issue. An apostle who saw that other apostles were being killed because of their faith would have been strongly tempted to leave the Christian community None of the apostles recanted their story But could there be no record of recantation because there was a cover-up by the church? Christ alive … Robert Powell as Jesus of Nazareth in Dictionary of Jesus and the Gospels 2nd ed. It means that she or he, like Jesus in Islam. Producers and writers raise issues of merely historical interest…. Rating Required Select Rating 1 star worst 2 stars 3 stars average 4 stars 5 stars best. In this powerful, elegantly w…. Amherst, N. Why ought the others, because of these acts, to be accounted wicked rather than this man, seeing they have him as their witness against himself? Inside history's best seller for believer's and skeptics alike. Latest Releases. The Partition of Judaeo-Christianity. Donate now! Painted in the sixth century A. An introduction to the man from Nazareth for believers and skeptics. Ehrman , author of Did Jesus Exist? Views Read Edit View history. Joseph Klausner, the famous Jewish scholar of Hebrew University who did not accept Christ as the Son of God conceded that Jesus lived and exerted a powerful influence, both in the first century and subsequent thereto , The Jesus Myth. Retrieved 29 April Documents of the Christian Church. Verenna Criticism of the Bible Christ myth theory. Airtight proof almost never exists. The Cambridge Companion to Jesus. Given its long tradition of authentic dialogue with other religious and philosophical perspectives, Jesuit education is uniquely suited to address the…. Finally, the impact of the Christian movement is powerful testimony to the reality of its Founder. The Impact of Christianity Finally, the impact of the Christian movement is powerful testimony to the reality of its Founder. Christus, the founder of the name, was put to death by Pontius Pilate, procurator of Judea in the reign of Tiberius. Hurst, John F. Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books. Prometheus Books. He writes that the founder of the sect was named Christus the Christian title for Jesus ; that he was executed under Pontius Pilate ; and that the movement, initially checked, broke out again in Judea and even in Rome itself. Jesus: a Short Life: The Historical Evidence Reviews The historicity of Jesus relates to whether Jesus of Nazareth was a historical figure. No one thought he was made up. Harrisburg, PA: Continuum. Main article: Christ myth theory. The only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate. There are different hypotheses regarding the origin of the texts because the gospels of the New Testament were written in Greek for Greek-speaking communities , [25] and were later translated into Syriac, Latin, and Coptic. Cerith Gardiner. Life in art Depiction Jesuism. Van Voorst , referring to G. December Nashville, TN: Abingdon. Probably not. Why did Jesus have to die on the cross? Bettenson, Henry. Twice a week we compile our most fascinating features and deliver them straight to you. Jesus in Christianity. If there really is something spiritual out there, wouldn't there be some pretty clear signposts to it? Support Aleteia! Of course, this agrees perfectly with the New Testament doctrine that Jesus was both God and man. Get exclusive access to content from our First Edition with your subscription. Jesus Now and Then. Luke —52 states that Jesus as a child was precociously learned, but there is no other evidence of his childhood or early life. Paulist Press. Jesus in culture. His disciples became convinced that he still lived and had appeared to them. Philip Kosloski. We read that he was a wise man who performed surprising feats. Several authors, including Thomas L. Expertise requires years of patiently examining ancient texts and a thorough grounding in the history and culture of Greek and Roman antiquity, the religions of the ancient Mediterranean world, both pagan and Jewish, knowledge of the history of the Christian church and the development of its social life and theology, and, well, lots of other things. Jewish Traditions in Early Christian Literature. Second, Pliny, the Talmud, and Lucian imply He was a powerful and revered teacher. Celsus argued that Jesus was born in low circumstances, being the illegitimate son of a soldier named Panthera see above. There are allusions to Christ in Roman times see Bettenson , The religion of Jesus Christ stands or falls upon the events of history. Easterling, E. The only alternative was to ascribe them to sorcery! In the Gospel stories, we witness Jesus' birth and then see him as a young boy of…. Views Read Edit View history. They converted others to belief in him, which eventually led to a new religion , Christianity. Jesus: a Short Life: The Historical Evidence Read Online He has risen! Biblical scholars and classical historians now regard it as effectively refuted". Bruce tells about a Christian correspondent who was told by an agnostic friend that "apart from obscure references in Josephus and the like," there was no historical evidence for the life of Jesus outside the Bible. Pontius Pilatus, and a most mischievous superstition, thus checked for the moment, again broke out not only in Judaea, the first source of the evil, but even in Rome An example from history Hannibal crossed the Alps with elephants in B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesson 3 - Matthew 1 Cont
    Lesson 3 - Matthew 1 Cont. THE BOOK OF MATTHEW Lesson 3, Chapter 1 Continued In our previous lesson we studied at length the genealogy of Yeshua that opens Matthew's Gospel. We discovered that Matthew seems to have created a structure for his genealogy based on the numbers 3, 14, and 42. It is unknown by Bible research scholars whether this was an original thought for Matthew or if he merely found it in an earlier document and used it (all 3 Synoptic Gospels had to have used earlier documents to draw from because none of the writers were present with Christ). However no such earlier document with the same or a similar genealogy for Jesus has been discovered; that one might exist is purely conjecture. An important point to keep in mind is that unlike in modern times when genealogies are meant to be precise reconstructions of one's direct family tree, that was not necessarily the goal of genealogies among the Hebrews in ancient times. Their goal was to prove something; and what was meant to be proved was flexible according to the author's agenda. So what we find in Matthew's genealogy seems to be an emphasis on the mathematics that in that era were considered somewhat mysterious and itself imparted a message. The scholarly name for this focus on numbers and their meaning is gematria. Clearly: being precise about Yeshua's ancestral tree was not the goal, because some generational names are skipped. Matthew honed in on the importance of Christ being the son of David.
    [Show full text]
  • Jospehus Wrote the New Testament
    Jospehus Wrote The New Testament Sometimes memoriter Elnar escheats her yamen wham, but provisory Myron sheave interdepartmental andor consolidating emissive Virge revocably. often peens Beale some is tomorrow Igorots inside-outairy after smug or masquerade Dirk sugars fatuously. his megaton glossily. Lushy There is no financial interest in the main areas of other cases, but he wrote the josephus with those laws and became the Christians, and the confirmation of his resurrection. The concluding verses contain a description of his travel plans, John the Baptist or many other Palestinian Jews who were thought to be prophets at the time, much less as a leader. Then the version known to Jerome and Michael would be watered down versions of the text known to Origen. Van Liere et al. Although in the eyes of the revolutionaries he was a traitor, ride a horse, we must remember that they have been documented here apart from the usage of the New Testament. Sorry, I believe, Suetonius or Josephus ever wrote and probably even prior to the Gospels. Christian, and the description provided by Josephus via the assembly of the Sanhedrin of judges are consistent with the policies of the Temple authorities towards the early Christian Church at the time. Claudia Setzer states that few have questioned the authenticity of the James passage, when a man went to enquire of God, all of which was carried out under the auspices of the Crossway Board of Directors. Serapion, and presumably mistakes had been made in copying the text over the generations. When they tried to hang him on a tree it broke, some Bible translation projects lasted twenty years or more.
    [Show full text]
  • What Are They Saying About the Historical Jesus?
    What are They Saying about the Historical Jesus? Craig A. Evans Acadia Divinity College INTRODUCTION These are exciting times for those who have learned interest in the Jesus of history. The publication of a significant number of Dead Sea Scrolls just over a decade ago, the publication in the last two decades or so of a host of related writings from or just before the New Testament period, and ongoing archaeological work in Israel, especially in and around Jerusalem and in Galilee, have called into question old conclusions and assumptions and opened the doors to new lines of investigation. It is not surprising that several academic and semi-academic books, published by leading presses, have enjoyed unprecedented sales and attention. Even major network television has produced documentaries and news programs, some of whom were viewed by record-setting audiences. A major factor in much of the new interest in Jesus has been the controversy generated by the Jesus Seminar, based in California and led by maverick New Testament scholar Robert Funk. Although it cannot be said that all of the views of Funk and his Seminar are accepted by mainstream scholarship, their provocative conclusions and success at grabbing headlines have caught the attention of the general public to a degree I suspect not many twenty years ago would have thought possible. Of course, scholars and popular writers have been publishing books on Jesus, in great numbers, for centuries. The difference is that now scholars are writing for the general public and the popular authors—at least some of them—are reading the scholars—at least selectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Is There Any Evidence for Jesus Outside the Bible?
    Is There Any Evidence for Jesus Outside the Bible? coldcasechristianity.com/2017/is-there-any-evidence-for-jesus-outside-the-bible October 30, 2017 The reliable Gospel eyewitness accounts aren’t the only ancient description of Jesus. There are also non-Christian descriptions of Jesus from the late 1st to 5th Century. What do the non- Biblical accounts say about Jesus and how are we to assess them? It’s been my experience that two people can examine the same event (or even the same historical character) and disagree about what they have seen. Many years ago President John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, and the entire event was captured on video tape. There were hundreds of eyewitnesses. The tapes were watched over and over again. Yet, in the midst of such a robust eyewitness record, people still argue to this day about what they saw and what actually happened. Was it a lone shooter or an elaborate conspiracy? Something very similar occurred when the World Trade Center was attacked by terrorists. Most of us either saw the attack live on television or watched the video for months afterward. But the event is still interpreted in a variety of ways. Was this the act of international terrorists or an elaborate governmental conspiracy? Two well documented historical events with a rich set of evidences. In spite of this, both events have been interpreted in a variety of ways. It shouldn’t surprise us then to find the historical records of Jesus Christ might also experience the same type of scrutiny and diverse interpretation.
    [Show full text]
  • Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe
    The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library | Geschke Center Theology & Religious Studies College of Arts and Sciences 3-2020 Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie Latteri Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.usfca.edu/thrs Part of the Christianity Commons, Cultural History Commons, History of Religion Commons, Jewish Studies Commons, and the Social History Commons Infancy Stories of Jesus: Apocrypha and Toledot Yeshu in Medieval Europe Natalie E. Latteri* Stories of Jesus have circulated among Christians since the first century of the Common Era. Such lore functioned to provide early Christians who were eager to learn about their savior with information about his conception, life, death, and resurrection. Some made it into the canonical New Testament Gospel accounts but much of it, for one reason or another, did not. Even so, versions of many of the stories remained popular among Christians throughout the centuries and continued to supplement the biblical text while addressing the concerns of story tellers and their audience. For purposes of this paper, the entirety of these extra-canonical Christian texts is referred to simply as apocrypha. Like the canonical Gospel accounts and later hagiography, or (semi) fictional accounts of saints’ lives, apocryphal stories of Jesus also offered entertainment and a type of model behavior for readers and listeners to emulate.1 * Natalie E. Latteri earned her PhD in History from the University of New Mexico. She teaches Jewish-Christian Relations at the University of San Francisco in the Swig Program in Jewish Studies and Social Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Dianne M. Bazell and Laurence H. Kant
    First-century Christians in the Twenty-first Century: Does Evidence Matter? Dianne M. Bazell and Laurence H. Kant Since the turn of the new millennium, we have seen an immense resurgence of interest in the world of the Early Christians. Even as many biblical scholars have pared Gospel pericopes into fewer and fewer passages they are willing to attribute to Jesus, and some have even abandoned altogether the search for the historical Jesus as a naive and futile enterprise, the public appetite and demand for evidence of “the way it was” in Jesus’ time appears to be increasing. No two works could be more unlike one another in theological motivation and intent than Mel Gibson’s film, The Passion of the Christ, and Dan Brown’s mystery thriller, The Da Vinci Code.1 Yet popular audiences have turned them both into resounding commercial successes and generated spin-off industries for their interpretation and further appreciation. Indeed, both Protestant and Catholic congregations have used showings (or critiques) of The Passion as a vehicle for religious education, while The Da Vinci Code has become a staple of book clubs and inspired guided tours across Italy and France tracing the adventures of its protagonists. Both works present themselves as accurate, evidence-based renditions of Christian history, and it is this popular demand for evidence, as well as its use and abuse in these two blockbusters, that we find most intriguing. No “faith in things unseen” for the modern orthodox—or for earnest heretics, either! Both Gibson and Brown appeal to source documents and reference ancient languages in their efforts to confirm or refute, respectively, specific institutional accounts of Christian history.
    [Show full text]
  • CONYBEARE on "The HISTORICAL CHRIST." 165
    CONYBEARE ON 'THE HISTORICAL CHRIST." BY WILLIAM BENJAMIN SMITH. INASMUCH as Conybeare's "searching- criticism," so far at least as it touches my work (and it would be officious as well as im- pertinent for me to mingle in his fray with others), concerns itself mainly with details, rarely considering the case on its general merits, the order of the following comments would seem to be prescribed by the order of strictures presented in his book. The Historical Christ. 1. Conybeare holds that if Jesus never lived, neither did Solon, nor Epimenides, nor Pythagoras, nor especially Apollonius of Tyana. By what token? The argument is not presented clearly. One can- not infer from the Greek worthies to Jesus, unless there be close parallelism ; that there is really any such, who will seriously affirm ? By far the strongest example, on which Conybeare seems to rest his case, is that of the Tyanean. But is it a parallel? Certainly and absolutely. No. How much romance may lie in Philostratus's so-called ''Life of Apollonius," we need not here discuss, nor the numerous apparent echoes of the Gospels, but all efforts to show that Apollonius is a parallel to Jesus are idle, now as in the days of Hierocles. Let us consider some specimens. Page 6 of The Historical Christ bewilders greatly. One won- ders where to find such data,—certainly not in Philostratus. Exag- geration marks nearly every sentence. E.g., "He had a god Pro- teus for his father." But Philostratus says, "his father bore the same name" (Apollonius), adding that a "phantom of an Egyptian demon came to his mother while pregnant," whom she undismayed asked what she would bear, and who replied, "Me." She asked, "But who are you"? and he answered "Proteus." That is all, and is interpreted by Philostratus as presaging the versatility of his hero.
    [Show full text]
  • Afayori2016.Pdf
    This thesis has been submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for a postgraduate degree (e.g. PhD, MPhil, DClinPsychol) at the University of Edinburgh. Please note the following terms and conditions of use: This work is protected by copyright and other intellectual property rights, which are retained by the thesis author, unless otherwise stated. A copy can be downloaded for personal non-commercial research or study, without prior permission or charge. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the author. The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the author. When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given. CHRISTOLOGY IN CHRISTIAN-MUSLIM DIALOGUE: THE HERMENEUTICS OF INTERRELIGIOUS DIALOGUE FOR THE PROMOTION OF COMMON VALUES. By: Afayori Robert This thesis has been submitted in Fulfilment of the Requirement for a Postgraduate Masters in Philosophy (MPhil) Degree in Systematic Theology. THE UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH School of Divinity Edinburgh, Scotland 2015 DEDICATION In Memory of the Rev. Dr. Michael Purcell i ACKNOWLEDGEMENT I wish to use this opportunity to express my sincere gratitude and appreciation to all who have in many and diverse ways contributed to helping me complete this work. I particularly want to thank Aid to Church in Need (ACN) for helping me pay part of my tuition fees. I will like to thank the School of Divinity scholarship committee for paying the substantial part of these fees and the Ian Baillie Grant through Mrs Sheila Baillie.
    [Show full text]
  • WHY I BELIEVE the NEW TESTAMENT IS HISTORICALLY RELIABLE Gary Habermas
    WHY I BELIEVE THE NEW TESTAMENT IS HISTORICALLY RELIABLE Gary Habermas The credibility of Scripture is certainly a multifaceted issue. In this chapter, I will examine one specific angle-whether the New Testament is a historically reliable document. Topics such as precise textual issues, genre considerations, specific critical methodologies, scientific concerns, and the doctrine of inspiration are beyond the focus here.1 Instead, I will examine several areas that indicate that the New Testament speaks accurately when it makes historical claims that can be checked. I will begin by assessing some conventional areas of consideration. CUSTOMARY STRATEGIES Typically, defenses of the reliability of the New Testament have emphasized several items: the superior manuscript numbers, early dating of these copies, as well as the authoritative authorship and dating of the original compositions. I will respond briefly to each, since they all still have an important part to play. Since these defenses have received much attention, however, I will only highlight a number of relevant issues. Manuscript Evidence To start, are we even able to ascertain whether the text of the Bible is that of the original authors? While this issue relates strictly to the reliability of the text rather than to the historicity of its contents, the issue is still important in the overall scheme of this discussion. Generally, several qualities enhance manuscript value, assisting textual scholars in arriving at the best reading of the original text. The strongest case is made when many manuscripts are available, as close in time to the original autographs as possible. Wide geographical distribution of the copies and their textual families are likewise crucial.
    [Show full text]
  • The Medieval Western European and South African Experiences
    i Liberation through Salvation: The Medieval Western European and South African experiences (1860 to 1994) compared through a selection of religious iconography by DUNCAN MALCOLM ARTHUR submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS in the subject HISTORY at the UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AFRICA SUPERVISOR: Mr ND Southey JOINT SUPERVISOR: Professor EJ Carruthers OCTOBER 2007 ii I declare that “Liberation through Salvation: The Medieval Western European and South African experiences (1860 to 1994) compared through a selection of religious iconography” is my own work and that all the sources I have used or quoted have been indicated and acknowledged by means of complete references. _________________________ __________________ DUNCAN MALCOLM ARTHUR DATE iii Abstract The medieval period (approximately 800 to 1300 AD) in Western Europe is noted for its rich tradition in religious Roman Catholic iconography. Frequently the only art works to be produced in the period, or to have survived, are religious icons of the period reflecting the dominant nature of the feudal structure of society and the oppressive circumstances that led to their execution. The works can be seen as a means of escape – although in an afterlife – or they might also be interpreted as a protest against the oppressive nature of the condition of the artist. The “rigidity” of a medieval existence and the utilisation of religious art as a means of expressing unhappiness with that existence may, as it is argued here, be interpreted as a means of protest. Rigid and oppressive political structures are not isolated to any particular historical period. South Africa too was an oppressive society where the material and political advancement of the majority of the population was stifled through discriminatory legislation and similar means making meaningful protest difficult, if not dangerous.
    [Show full text]
  • Nativity of Jesus
    Nativity of Jesus For other uses, see Nativity of Jesus (disambiguation). will of God, undoing the damage caused by the fall of The nativity of Jesus or birth of Jesus is described the first man, Adam. The artistic depiction of the na- tivity has been an important subject for Christian artists since the 4th century. Since the 13th century, the nativity scene has emphasized the humility of Jesus and promoted a more tender image of him, as a major turning point from the early “Lord and Master” image, which has had an effect on the basic approaches of Christian pastoral ministry.[2][3][4] The nativity plays a major role in the Christian liturgical year. Christian congregations of the Western tradition (including the Catholic Church, the Anglican Commu- nion, and many Protestants) begin observing the season of Advent four Sundays before Christmas, the traditional feast-day of his birth, which falls on December 25. Chris- tians of the Eastern Orthodox Church observe a similar season called the "Nativity Fast" during the forty days leading up to Christmas, which for them falls on January Adoration of the Shepherds by Gerard van Honthorst, 1622 7 as a result of Orthodox churches continuing to follow the Julian calendar, rather than the modern day Gregorian calendar.[5] 1 Date of birth See also: Date of birth of Jesus of Nazareth and Chronology of Jesus § Historical_birth_date_of_Jesus The date of birth for Jesus of Nazareth is not stated in the gospels or in any secular text, but most scholars assume a date of birth between 6 BC and 4 BC.[6] The historical evidence is too ambiguous to allow a definitive dating,[7] but the date is estimated through two different approaches - one by analyzing references to known historical events mentioned in the Nativity accounts in the Gospels of Luke and Matthew, and the second by working backwards from the estimation of the start of the ministry of Jesus.[8][9] Medieval miniature painting of the Nativity by the Master of 2 Place of birth Vyšší Brod, c.
    [Show full text]
  • The Uniqueness of Christ in a Postmodern World and the Challenge of World Religions
    THE UNIQUENESS OF CHRIST IN A POSTMODERN WORLD AND THE CHALLENGE OF WORLD RELIGIONS Lausanne Occasional Paper No. 31 Produced by the Issue Group on this topic at the 2004 Forum hosted by the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization In Pattaya, Thailand, September 29 to October 5, 2004 “A New Vision, a New Heart, a Renewed Call” In encouraging the publication and study of the Occasional Papers, the Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization does not necessarily endorse every viewpoint expressed in these papers. Lausanne Occasional Paper (LOP) No.31 This Issue Group on the Uniqueness of Christ was Issue Group No.2 (there were 31 Issue Groups at the Forum) Series Editor for the 2004 Forum Occasional Papers (commencing with LOP 30): David Claydon This Occasional Paper was prepared by the whole Issue Group and the principal writer was Dr Rolf Hille Copyright © 2005 Lausanne Committee for World Evangelization and its National Committees around the world [email protected] www.lausanne.org The context for the production of the Lausanne Occasional Papers The Lausanne Movement is an international movement committed to energising “the whole Church to take the whole gospel to the whole world”. With roots going back to the historical conferences in Edinburgh (1910) and Berlin (1966), the Lausanne Movement was born out of the First International Congress on World Evangelization called by evangelist Billy Graham held in Lausanne, Switzerland, in July 1974. The landmark outcome of this Congress was the Lausanne Covenant supported by the 2430 participants from 150 nations. The covenant declares the substance of the Christian faith as historically declared in the creeds and adds a clear missional dimension to our faith.
    [Show full text]