DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Universal from Wikipedia, the Free

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Universal from Wikipedia, the Free Cultural universal From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Text document with red question mark.svg This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations where appropriate. (May 2009) A cultural universal (as discussed by George Murdock, Claude Lévi-Strauss, Donald Brown and others) is an element, pattern, trait, or institution that is common to all human cultures worldwide. Some anthropological and sociological theorists that take a cultural relativist perspective may deny the existence of cultural universals: the extent to which these universals are "cultural" in the narrow sense, or in fact biologically inherited behavior is an issue in the "nature versus nurture" controversy. Contents [hide] * 1 General * 2 List of cultural universals o 2.1 Language and cognition o 2.2 Society o 2.3 Myth, ritual and aesthetics o 2.4 Technology * 3 Bibliography [edit] General Cultural universals are sometimes referred to as "empty universals" since merely remarking on their presence in a particular culture doesn't actually show anything unique or significant about that culture. The emergence of these universals dates to the Upper Paleolithic, with the first evidence of full behavioral modernity. [edit] List of cultural universals Among the cultural universals listed by Brown (1991) are: [edit] Language and cognition Main article: Linguistic universal * Language employed to manipulate others * Language employed to misinform or mislead * Language is translatable * Abstraction in speech and thought * Antonyms, synonyms * Logical notions of "and," "not," "opposite," "equivalent," "part/whole," "general/particular" * Binary cognitive distinctions * Color terms: black, white * Classification of: age, behavioral propensities, body parts, colors, fauna, flora, inner states, kin, sex, space, tools, weather conditions * Continua (ordering as cognitive pattern) * Discrepancies between speech, thought, and action * Figurative speech, metaphors * Symbolism, symbolic speech * Synesthetic metaphors * Tabooed utterances * Special speech for special occasions * Prestige from proficient use of language (e.g. poetry) * Planning * Units of time [edit] Society * Personal names * Family or household * Kin groups * Peer groups not based on family * Actions under self-control distinguished from those not under control * Affection expressed and felt * Age grades * Age stati * Age terms * Law: rights and obligations, rules of membership * Moral sentiments * Distinguishing right and wrong, good and bad * Promise/oath * Prestige inequalities * Statuses and roles * Leaders * De facto oligarchy * Property * Coalitions * Collective identities * Conflict * Cooperative labor * Gender roles * Males dominate public/political realm * Males more aggressive, more prone to lethal violence, more prone to theft * Males engage in more coalitionist violence by raping people * Males on average travel greater distances over lifetime * Marriage * Husband older than wife on average * Copulation normally conducted in privacy * Incest prevention or avoidance, incest between mother and son unthinkable or tabooed * Rape, but rape proscribed * Collective decision making * Etiquette * Inheritance rules * Generosity admired, gift giving * Redress of wrongs, sanctions * Sexual jealousy * Shame * Territoriality * Triangular awareness (assessing relationships among the self and two other people) * Some forms of proscribed violence * Visiting * Trade [edit] Myth, ritual and aesthetics * Magical thinking * Use of magic to increase life, win love, * Beliefs about death * Beliefs about disease * Beliefs about fortune and misfortune * Divination * Attempts to control weather * Dream interpretation * Beliefs and narratives * Proverbs, sayings * Poetry/rhetorics * Healing practices, medicine * Childbirth customs * Rites of passage * Music, rhythm, dance * Play * Toys, playthings * Death rituals, mourning * Feasting * Sexual double entendres * Body adornment * Hairstyles * Dragon myths * creation, end times myths [edit] Technology * Shelter * Control of fire * Tools, tool making * Weapons, spear * Containers * Cooking * Lever * Tying material (i.e., something like string), twining (i.e. weaving or similar) [edit] Bibliography * Erika Bourginon (1973) Diversity and Homogeneity in World Societies. New Haven, Connecticut: HRAF Press. * Donald Brown (1991) Human Universals. Philadelphia, Temple University Press (online summary). * Joseph H. Greenberg, et al. (1978) Universals of Human Language, 4 vols. Stanford University Press. * Charles D. Laughlin and Eugene G. d'Aquili (1974) Biogenetic Structuralism. New York: Columbia University Press. * Claude Lévi-Strauss (1966) The Savage Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press [first published in French in 1962]. * George P. Murdock (1945), "The Common Denominator of Culture," in The Science of Man in the World Crisis, Ralph Linton (ed.). New York: Columbia University Press. * Charles E. Osgood, William S May, and Murray S Miron (1975) Cross-Cultural Universals of Affective Meaning Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press. * Steven Pinker (2002), The Blank Slate: The Modern Denial of Human Nature, New York: Penguin Putnam. * Rik Pinxten (1976) "Epistemic Universals: A Contribution to Cognitive Anthropology," in Universalism Versus Relativism in Language and Thought, R. Pinxten (ed.). The Hague: Mouto .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Review Of" Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" by REL Faris
    Swarthmore College Works History Faculty Works History 12-1-1973 Review Of "Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" By R. E.L. Faris Robert C. Bannister Swarthmore College Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history Part of the History Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation Robert C. Bannister. (1973). "Review Of "Chicago Sociology, 1920-1932" By R. E.L. Faris". Isis. Volume 64, Issue 224. 570-571. DOI: 10.1086/351211 https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-history/196 This work is brought to you for free by Swarthmore College Libraries' Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in History Faculty Works by an authorized administrator of Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Review Author(s): Robert C. Bannister Review by: Robert C. Bannister Source: Isis, Vol. 64, No. 4 (Dec., 1973), pp. 570-571 Published by: The University of Chicago Press on behalf of The History of Science Society Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/229679 Accessed: 11-06-2015 16:03 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. The University of Chicago Press and The History of Science Society are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Isis.
    [Show full text]
  • Linton, Ralph
    ANTHROPOLOGY THOUGHT JUNE 2019 Linton, Ralph Ralph Linton (1893–1953), American cultural anthropologist, was one of the major contributors to the reconstruction of anthropology during the second quarter of the twentieth century. Trained in the traditions of the North American “historical school” of anthropology, Lin ton remained loyal throughout his career to the broad interests and general principles established by Franz Boas and other American anthropologists. But with the publication in 1936 of The Study of Man, which was quickly recognized by social scientists all over the world as a pioneering study of human behavior, he embarked on a series of creative and stimulating studies which provided new conceptions of social structure and cultural organization. He related these conceptions in a clear if somewhat simple manner to the biological individual and his personality and utilized them in his analyses of the processes of cultural change. Linton belonged to the “third generation” of American academic anthropologists, succeeding such second-generation students of Putnam and Boas as Wissler, Dixon, Kroeber, Goldenweiser, Lowie, Sapir, and Radin. These academicians, together with a number of outstanding journeymen and masters involved more in field research than in teaching, had created a distinctive variety of anthropology. Like Tylor in England, they had a holistic approach to human studies which is still, thanks in part to Linton, a mark of American anthropology. In the Americas much more than in Europe almost all anthropological study and training had been nurtured by experience in the field and disciplined by the empiricism required by field work on specific problems treating the temporal and spatial dimensions of culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Franz Boas: Who He Was, What He Did, and Why It Matters
    Anderson 1 Dylan Anderson Carol Pannocione GERM-1020 7 February 2020 Franz Boas: Who he was, what he did, and why it matters Franz Boas, to this day, is a figure in anthropology whose importance to the discipline can hardly be rivaled by any other figure. The ways in which his radical school of thought overhauled American anthropology cannot be overstated. Old ways of thinking with regards to race and culture were thrown to the wayside by Boas and his students. His life as well as his works were drenched in controversy and rivalry, partly due to his attack on the academic status quo. 1. Biography When Bendix Feibes Aron Levi was made to take a surname in 1808, he took the surname Boas, after the character from the Book of Ruth (Zumwalt 2). Bendix Boas went on, then, to become a textile merchant in Lubbecke, cementing a position in the community (2). At some point, his descendants moved to Minden (3). This is where Boas’ life began. Franz Uri Boas was born in Minden, a small town in the Westphalia region of Prussia on 9 July 1858 (King 14). His parents – Meier and Sophie Boas – were upper-class and highly educated Jews who ascribed to Haskalah thought (15). Haskalah was a philosophical school of Judaism concerned with the moral and cultural renewal of Judaism, especially the revival of the Hebrew language in daily usage. Although he was an excellent student all throughout school, his teachers bemoaned the fact that he never had any firm interest (King 16). He did especially well in high school in the Anderson 2 classical languages, geography, and arithmetic (16).
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Cultural Universals and Cultural Relativities G E R Lloyd Needham Research Institute, Cambridge
    INTERDISCIPLINARY SCIENCE REVIEWS, Vol. 35 No. 3–4, 2010, 201–14 History and Human Nature: Cross-cultural Universals and Cultural Relativities G E R Lloyd Needham Research Institute, Cambridge Recent studies in a wide range of different, if overlapping, fields of research have converged on a number of issues concerning the cross-cultural universality, or the cultural relativity, of human cognition. Those fields include social anthropology, linguistics, history, philosophy, developmental psychology, evolutionary psychology, and neurophysiology as well as cognitive science, the synoptic discipline, itself. The conclusions that have been proposed differ sharply. Some researchers (for example, Nisbett 2003) are convinced that there are radical differences in the ways in which different groups of humans perceive and reason — and in the ways in which earlier humans have done so in the past insofar as their thought patterns can be reconstructed from the evidence available to us. Others insist that, despite surface differences, there are robust underlying cross-cultural universals in such areas as colour perception (Berlin and Kay 1969), the basic emotions (Wierzbicka 1999) and even the ‘common-sense’ classification of animals (Atran 1990). A first question that arises concerns whether or how far the parties to the disputes are merely talking past one another. Certainly there are major differences in the data cited and the methodologies used in those different areas of research. Social anthropologists analyse ethnographic field reports, including those stemming from questionnaires designed to elicit responses to key issues to do with how their subjects perceive and reason. These may relate to matters that do not form part of the ordinary experience of the people investigated, such as how they would classify animals or artefacts that they have never seen.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Universals
    Course Name (Course Number): SOC 210- Introduction to Sociology This course includes the scientific study of human society, culture, and social interactions. Topics include socialization, research methods, diversity and inequality, cooperation and conflict, social change, social institutions, and organizations. Upon completion, students should be able to demonstrate knowledge of sociological concepts as they apply to the interplay among individuals, groups, and societies. This course has been approved to satisfy the Comprehensive Articulation Agreement general education core requirement in social/behavioral sciences. (3 credit hours, 3 contact hours) No prerequisites, no co-requisites, no entry test requirements. The ability to comprehend college-level reading and express through written assignments is imperative for success in the course. Activity and Author Name: What is a cultural universal? Developed by Cate Shiles, Caldwell Community College & Technical Institute (correspondence: [email protected]) Activity Description: Cultural universals are best described as concepts, social constructs, or patterns of behavior that are common to ALL human cultures; meaning every society in existence exhibits some form of the universal. Some examples of other cultural universals include: gift-giving, marriage, bodily adornment, incest taboo, and rules of hygiene. That said, how a cultural universal is expressed varies widely according to the given society. For instance, some form of bodily adornment is exhibited in every culture and society, but how this is accomplished varies widely. Some societies adorn their bodies with tattoos and body piercings; others adorn their body with scarification or elaborate costume. Social institutions can be described as large-scale patterned behaviors or ideas of a society that heavily structure and influence the everyday lives of individuals in the given culture.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and Personality Studies
    Culture and Culture and Personality studies: Introduction ‘Culture and personality’ is the earliest name of the school or thoughts of school. It is important study in psychological anthropology, thus culture and personality studies, also called psychological anthropology. Its beginnings are associated especially with the great American linguist and anthropologist Edward Sapir (1884—1939). Sapir was influenced by German Gestalt psychologists, who had argued that perception could be understood only when the thing perceived was viewed not as an assemblage of separate elements, but as an organized pattern (Gestalt). So when one looks, for example, at a landscape painting, one sees it not as flat planes of colour laid against one another, but as a whole — ‘a landscape’. This example shows us too why a whole may be more than the sum of its parts and have its own essential properties. In this Gestalt view, meaning was a function of organized patterns, and Sapir applied this idea to his analyses of language and of culture and personality. Sapir was suspicious of the contemporary concept of culture, which he described as ‘tidy tables of contents’ attached to particular groups of people. In an influential 1934 essay he argued that ‘the more fully one tries to understand a culture, the more it seems to take on the characteristics of a personality organization’ (1985 [1949]: 594). The study of the development of personality was Sapir’s solution to the problems posed by the way that, in anthropological accounts, culture ‘can be made to assume the appearance of a closed system of behaviour’ (p. 594).
    [Show full text]
  • Importance of Learning Culture and Cultural Universal in Early Grade Education
    International (Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts) Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University Volume 11 Number 4 January-June 2018 ISSN 1906 – 3431 Importance of Learning Culture and Cultural Universal in Early Grade education Sasipat champa* Kornphassorn Intarabumrung** Abstract Human society in globalization world nowadays, there are rapidly communicated and traveled. So learning is cultivated to learners since early grade education, should learning skills and practices to capably application in real life, besides learning content knowledge. Purpose of this article is demonstrated definition, importance and relationship of curriculum to engaged in culture and cultural universals between Thai and USA (by NCSS). Including, presentation integrated and demonstrated to learners for study subject matters which related to community and universe. And study in depth and created understanding knowledge in universal theme concepts from subject sources about culture and cultural universals. Keywords: Culture, Cultural Universal, Early education * Lecturer, Dr. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University ** Assist Professor, Dr. Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Faculty of Education Silpakorn University 848 Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University International (Humanities, Social Sciences and Arts) ISSN 1906 – 3431 Volume 11 Number 4 January-June 2018 Culture and Cultural Universals What is culture? The word culture is a notoriously difficult term for definition. However, commonly term to define about culture which come from anthropologists and other behavioral scientists and it was used in the way that culture is the full range of learned human behavior patterns. The term was first used in this way by pioneer English. Anthropologists Edward B. Tylor in his book, Primitive Culture, published in 1871.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and 2 Social Structures
    Unit Culture and 2 Social Structures 68 Chapter 3 Culture Chapter 4 Socialization Chapter 5 Social Structure and Society Chapter 6 Groups and Formal Organizations Chapter 7 Deviance and Social Control 69 Chapter 3 Culture Sections 1. The Basis of Culture 2. Language and Culture 3. Norms and Values 4. Beliefs and Material Culture 5. Cultural Diversity and Similarity Learning Objectives After reading this chapter, you will be able to • explain how culture and heredity affect social behavior. • describe how language and culture are related. • name the essential components of culture. • discuss how cultural diversity is promoted within a society. • understand the role of ethnocentrism in society. • identify similarities in cultures around the world. 70 Applying Sociology The crowing rooster wakes Jabu very early. Already her mother has carried a bucket of water from the village tap and put it on the fire to heat. Bread is laid out on a newspaper on the ground, ready to be cut and spread with jam. Meanwhile, Jabu wraps her baby brother in a blanket and ties him on her back, soothing him with a melody as she begins her chores. The goats must be milked and the cattle need to be watered. After her chores, Jabu dresses for the two-mile walk to school. On the way, she stops to greet a village elder who asks about her father who works in the distant diamond mines. By the time she arrives at school, Jabu sees that school assem- bly has already begun. The headmistress decides to set an example of Jabu and calls her up front to slap her hand with a ruler.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmitting Values to the Young: a Cross-Cultural Perspective
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 260 020 SO 016 861 AUTHOR Schwartz, Henrietta; Wynne, Edward A. TITLE Transmitting Values to the Young: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. INSTITUTION New York Univ., N.Y. Dept. of Psychology. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (ED), Washington, DC. PUB DATE 15 Jul 85 GRANT NIE-G-84-0012 NOTE 20p.; Section 2, Part 1 of Equity in Values Education: Do the Values Education Aspects of Public School Curricula Deal Fairly with D. verse Belief Systems? Final Report, July 1985 (SO 016 857). PUB TYPE Viewpoints (120) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Cross Cultural Studies; *Cultural Awareness; Cultural Education; *Educational Anthropology; Elementary Secondary Education; Equal Education; Moral Values; Public Schools; *Religion; Social History; Social Studies; Traditionalism; *Values Eiucation ABSTRACT This section, from a larger report describing a project designed to systematically investigate how religious and traditional values are represented in today's public school curricula, addresses the question of why values should be taught, and if so, what rationale for teaching values is most defensible. Education systems have conducted enculturation through thousands of years of history and pre-history. On the basis of anthropology it is argued that values are an inescapable part of any culture or subculture, including schools. To fulfill the socialization functions, schools must transmit the cultural heritage, the technology and the skills and tools necessary for survival, the norms of the mainstream culture, the
    [Show full text]
  • PDF Download Intercultural Communication for Global
    INTERCULTURAL COMMUNICATION FOR GLOBAL ENGAGEMENT 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Regina Williams Davis | 9781465277664 | | | | | Intercultural Communication for Global Engagement 1st edition PDF Book Resilience, on the other hand, includes having an internal locus of control, persistence, tolerance for ambiguity, and resourcefulness. This textbook is suitable for the following courses: Communication and Intercultural Communication. Along with these attributes, verbal communication is also accompanied with non-verbal cues. Create lists, bibliographies and reviews: or. Linked Data More info about Linked Data. A critical analysis of intercultural communication in engineering education". Cross-cultural business communication is very helpful in building cultural intelligence through coaching and training in cross-cultural communication management and facilitation, cross-cultural negotiation, multicultural conflict resolution, customer service, business and organizational communication. September Lewis Value personal and cultural. Inquiry, as the first step of the Intercultural Praxis Model, is an overall interest in learning about and understanding individuals with different cultural backgrounds and world- views, while challenging one's own perceptions. Need assistance in supplementing your quizzes and tests? However, when the receiver of the message is a person from a different culture, the receiver uses information from his or her culture to interpret the message. Acculturation Cultural appropriation Cultural area Cultural artifact Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • The Metaethics of Multiculturalism Joseph Thompson University of Alaska Faribanks, [email protected]
    Comparative Civilizations Review Volume 53 Article 4 Number 53 Fall 2005 10-1-2005 Cultural Relativism or Covert Universalism? The Metaethics of Multiculturalism Joseph Thompson University of Alaska Faribanks, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr Recommended Citation Thompson, Joseph (2005) "Cultural Relativism or Covert Universalism? The eM taethics of Multiculturalism," Comparative Civilizations Review: Vol. 53 : No. 53 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/ccr/vol53/iss53/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the All Journals at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Comparative Civilizations Review by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Thompson: Cultural Relativism or Covert Universalism? The Metaethics of Mul 34 Comparative Civilizations Review CULTURAL RELATIVISM OR COVERT UNIVERSALISM? THE METAETHICS OF MULTICULTURALISM JOSEPH THOMPSON PHILOSOPHY & HUMANITIES, UNIVERSITY OF ALASKA FAIRBANKS [email protected] If the power of thought is universal among mankind, so like- wise is the possession of reason, making us rational crea- tures. It follows, therefore, that this reason speaks no less universally to us all with its 'thou shalt' or 'thou shalt not.' So then there is a world-law; which in turn means that we are all fellow-citizens and share a common citizenship, and that the world is a single city. —Marcus Aurelius Meditations 4.4 (167 CE)1 Claims to moral universality are basic to conceptions of human rights, the concept of war crimes and crimes against humanity, and our understanding of international law and justice.
    [Show full text]
  • Elaine Hatfield & Richard L. Rapson
    12 Culture and Passionate Love Elaine Hatfield and Richard L. Rapson University of Hawaii, USA Abstract For more than 4,000 years, poets and storytellers have sung of the delights and sufferings of love and lust. This chapter reviews what scholars from various disciplines have discovered about the nature of passionate love and sexual desire. Anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists have assumed that passionate love is a cultural universal. Cultural researchers, historians, and social psychologists have emphasized the stunning diversity in the way passionate love and sexual desire have been viewed and experienced. Culture, ethnicity and the rules passed down by political and religious authorities have a profound impact on the way people think about and act out love and sex. Marriage for love and sex for pleasure have always been deeply threatening to political and religious leaders who have feared the individualistic implications of permissive approaches to romance and passion. Individualism and personal choice are seen as the enemies of order and authority; such freedom are deemed heretical, sinful, dangerous, and an invitation to chaos, selfishness, and anarchy. The fight over the rules governing love, marriage, divorce, and sex stands as one of history’s central and most powerful themes. Today, however, in the era of widespread travel, global capitalism, and the World Wide Web, many of these traditional cross-cultural differences seem to be disappearing. Authority is giving way nearly everywhere to increased freedom, particularly in the personal realm, in the world of passion. Is the erosion of traditional authority and strict personal rules really happening—and if so what does that portend for personal and societal futures? 13 In all cultures, men and women feel the stirrings of passionate love and sexual desire.
    [Show full text]