Icons of Early Conservation Biology

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Icons of Early Conservation Biology BOOKS ET AL. inhumanity of the wilderness nor the ram- antebellum America and whose legacy may HISTORY OF SCIENCE pant deforestation that shook Thoreau. But, to good effect be used in addressing current as Walls notes in discussing the writer and affairs. I recommend The Passage to Cosmos Icons of Early naturalist Susan Fenimore Cooper, “[t]he as a fi ne piece of Humboldt scholarship, a true passage to Cosmos is not found, but heartfelt plea for environmental holism, and Conservation Biology forged.” This forging was carried out by an enjoyable read. “Humboldt’s American children,” promi- Jared Farmer nently among them the environmentalists References and Notes 1. A. von Humboldt, Voyage de Humboldt et Bonpland. John Muir and George Perkins Marsh. And Première partie. Relation historique (Schoell, Paris, he U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Walls does her own forging, too. 1814–1825). May 2008 listing of the polar bear ( 1) By recovering the excitement of Hum- 2. Voyage aux régions équinoxiales du Nouveau Continent in Alaska as a threatened species was a fait en 1799, 1800, 1801, 1802, 1803 et 1804, par Al. T boldtian explorations and travel experiences, politically and emotionally charged moment. de Humboldt et A. Bonpland [for its complex publication Walls wins back Humboldt for the 21st cen- history, see ( 5)]. Environmentalists had worked hard to turn tury. Through her account, he joins forces 3. A. von Humboldt, Kosmos: Entwurf einer physischen the already-iconic bear into a symbol of with present-day heroes such as Edward O. Weltbeschreibung (Cotta, Stuttgart and Tübingen, global warming. As part of the species recov- 1845–1862). Wilson and his Cosmos of a sort, Consilience 4. E. O. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge (Knopf, ery plan, the government will continue to cen- ( 4), all of them reorienting and transform- New York, 1998); reviewed in (6 ). sus bear populations. As historian Mark Bar- ing disciplines and divisions that threaten “to 5. H. Fiedler, U. Leitner, Alexander von Humboldt Schriften: row shows, politically motivated inventories Bibliographie der selbständig erschienenen Werke leach the poetry out of our technologically (Akademie, Berlin, 2000). of wildlife long predate the Endangered Spe- driven lives.” Walls reclaims for the present 6. J. Dupré, Science 280, 1395 (1998). cies Act and the dis- a man whose personality and work had a for- cipline of conserva- mative infl uence on the cultural landscape of 10.1126/science.1183462 tion biology. Nature’s Nature’s Ghosts Ghosts is essentially Confronting Extinction a chronicle of proto- from the Age of Jefferson BROWSINGS professional scien- to the Age of Ecology tists making lists of by Mark V. Barrow Jr. threatened totemic Alexander von Humboldt and the Botanical Exploration of the Americas. University of Chicago Press, H. Walter Lack. Prestel, Munich, 2009. 280 pp. $185, £125. ISBN 9783791341422. species. Chicago, 2009. 509 pp. $35, Although “botany was never the real focus of Humboldt’s interests,” his 1799–1804 travels with By using in the £24. ISBN 9780226038148. Aimé Bonpland made an enormous contribution to the recording of plant diversity. Humboldt and subtitle from the Age his collaborators described and named hundreds of plant species from the northern Andes, Mexico, of Jefferson instead and Cuba. (Although several 18th-century Spanish expeditions had also collected many of these, their of “the Age of Cuvier” or “the Age of Geol- fi ndings long remained unpublished.) Lack offers a short account of this research, highlighting links ogy,” Barrow (a professor at Virginia Tech) between the 19 volumes of “Partie unapologetically announces his American 6: Botanique” of Voyage aux régions bias. His nationalist perspective allows him équinoxiales du Nouveau Continent to draw a simple narrative arc: At the time of and the underlying letters, fi eld the founding of the U.S. republic, American notes, herbarium specimens, draw- naturalists, including Thomas Jefferson, did ings, and botanical prints. The au- not believe in the possibility of extinction, for thor notes that Bonpland carried out it seemed to violate the economy of nature. most of the actual botanical work Two centuries later, the United States passed in the fi eld but once back in Paris the world’s gold-standard law for protect- failed to complete the two major ing species from extinction. What happened texts he started. Humboldt then between? No single book could explain it recruited Carl Sigismund Kunth and all, and Barrow doesn’t try. Nature’s Ghosts a small team of researchers, artists, skimps on cultural, economic, and political engravers, and printers who saw the analysis. Instead, the book means to restore work through to publication. Lack the stature of the U.S. naturalists who created stresses Humboldt’s organizational talents and the modern aspects of the concept of endangered species. his methodology: careful number- Barrow’s narrative begins with a quick ing of specimens, preservation of summary of the geologists, paleontolo- notebooks, production of illustra- gists, and comparative anatomists in Europe tions, and deposition of specimens who established the reality of extinction. in prominent public institutions. The The original icon of prehistoric extinction richly illustrated volume includes a was the American mastodon. Thinking for- selection of 82 full-color plates from ward in time, Cuvier and Lyell posited that “Partie 6” (such as Acineta superba, human-caused extinction was possible, an epiphytic orchid Humboldt and Bonpland collected from cloudforest in Ecuador). The reviewer is at the Department of History, State Uni- versity of New York, Stony Brook, NY 11794, USA. E-mail: CREDIT: COURTESY PRESTEL COURTESY CREDIT: [email protected] www.sciencemag.org SCIENCE VOL 327 15 JANUARY 2010 271 Published by AAAS BOOKS ET AL. even inevitable, and potentially regrettable, Icon of extinction. When Martha, the last but not unnatural. Finally, in the 1830s and known passenger pigeon, died on 1 Sep- 1840s, investigations into the histories of tember 1914, her body was rushed to the three kinds of fl ightless birds—the dodo, the Smithsonian Institution, where it was long moa family, and the great auk—proved that displayed as a warning that even a species humans could in fact eliminate whole spe- whose population numbered in the billions cies. Of these, the auk is most important to could fall victim to humans. Barrow’s story because it was the fi rst spe- cies to die in front of naturalists’ eyes— sequoia—an American symbol linked or their gunsights. Various collectors and to the mastodon in 19th-century popu- museums vied for the fi nal specimens. lar culture, a species long thought to be It was, however, the dramatic, continental an evolutionary relict doomed to natu- declines of the American bison and the pas- ral extinction and in danger of human- senger pigeon in the late 19th century that caused extinction. turned U.S. naturalists into conservation- Nonetheless, Barrow has produced ists. For example, the American Bison Soci- something noteworthy—the defi nitive ety began a captive breeding program at the prehistory of conservation biology in Bronx Zoo to save the shaggy national sym- America. The book is especially strong bol. Propagation of passenger pigeons proved in its treatment of the underappreciated much harder, and the fi nal two birds—a child- cohort of fi eld biologists between Wil- less pair named George and Martha Washing- liam T. Hornaday and Aldo Leopold. ton—died in the Cincinnati Zoo. Overall, Nature’s Ghosts is rousing In the fi rst half of the 20th century, U.S. and depressing. Despite great changes naturalists enlarged their scope of concern. in U.S. attitudes about nature, Ameri- They looked beyond the nation’s borders— cans still care more about charismatic fi rst to the big-game country of Africa, then to megafauna than lowly, ugly creatures. the Galápagos Islands. Naturalists promoted matics, no computer modeling. In Barrow’s Although the original wording of the Endan- the passage of the Western Hemisphere Con- telling, their greatest tool was their “power- gered Species Act was surprisingly sweep- vention in 1940 and the creation of the Inter- ful emotional response” to wildlife, their ing, in application it has been something else. national Union for the Protection of Nature “deep sense of connection” to nature. After As famously shown by the snail darter court in 1948. In the same era, they added preda- World War II, naturalists found a home in case, not all threatened beings are created tors and scavengers to the list of mammals new nongovernmental organizations like the equal. Ironically, the narrative of N a t u re ’s and birds worthy of attention and preservation. World Wildlife Fund and enlarged agencies Ghosts replicates the popular disregard for Under the infl uence of the new discipline like the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Not certain classes of life. Pigeons were not, of ecology, naturalists began to inventory until Michael Soulé’s generation did “indoor after all, the only species that darkened the endangered habitats instead of just hunting biologists” within academia try to recover American sky with awesome fl ocks. There and mounting, capturing and breeding. the American naturalist tradition—a move was also the Rocky Mountain locust—a once- In the pre–World War II era, naturalists applauded by Barrow, who locates the roots prodigious species that went extinct about the and ecologists could not apply for govern- of conservation biology in natural history. same time without any fuss or expression of ment grants to conduct their baseline studies. The author’s admiration for his biographi- human regret ( 4). How many people feel a Institutional support then largely came from cal subjects creates problems. In passing, he deep sense of connection to grasshoppers? privately endowed natural history museums provides evidence that many of his players Barrow’s naturalists made no comment about and conservation groups.
Recommended publications
  • Grasshoppered: America's Response to the 1874
    Nebraska History posts materials online for your personal use. Please remember that the contents of Nebraska History are copyrighted by the Nebraska State Historical Society (except for materials credited to other institutions). The NSHS retains its copyrights even to materials it posts on the web. For permission to re-use materials or for photo ordering information, please see: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/magazine/permission.htm Nebraska State Historical Society members receive four issues of Nebraska History and four issues of Nebraska History News annually. For membership information, see: http://nebraskahistory.org/admin/members/index.htm Article Title: Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion Full Citation: Alexandra M Wagner, “Grasshoppered: America’s Response to the 1874 Rocky Mountain Locust Invasion,” Nebraska History 89 (2008): 154-167 URL of article: http://www.nebraskahistory.org/publish/publicat/history/full-text/NH2008Grasshoppered.pdf Date: 2/11/2014 Article Summary: It was a plague of biblical proportions, influencing generations of federal agricultural policy . and foreshadowing today’s expectations about the government’s role during natural disasters. Cataloging Information: Names: Swain Finch, Solomon Butcher, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, E O C Ord, N A M Dudley, Jeffrey Lockwood, John S Pillsbury, John L Pennington Keywords: Swain Finch, H Westermann, Robert W Furnas, Thomas A Osborn, Rocky Mountain locust (Melanoplus spretus), Nebraska Relief and Aid Association,
    [Show full text]
  • 2010 Animal Species of Concern
    MONTANA NATURAL HERITAGE PROGRAM Animal Species of Concern Species List Last Updated 08/05/2010 219 Species of Concern 86 Potential Species of Concern All Records (no filtering) A program of the University of Montana and Natural Resource Information Systems, Montana State Library Introduction The Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) serves as the state's information source for animals, plants, and plant communities with a focus on species and communities that are rare, threatened, and/or have declining trends and as a result are at risk or potentially at risk of extirpation in Montana. This report on Montana Animal Species of Concern is produced jointly by the Montana Natural Heritage Program (MTNHP) and Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife, and Parks (MFWP). Montana Animal Species of Concern are native Montana animals that are considered to be "at risk" due to declining population trends, threats to their habitats, and/or restricted distribution. Also included in this report are Potential Animal Species of Concern -- animals for which current, often limited, information suggests potential vulnerability or for which additional data are needed before an accurate status assessment can be made. Over the last 200 years, 5 species with historic breeding ranges in Montana have been extirpated from the state; Woodland Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Greater Prairie-Chicken (Tympanuchus cupido), Passenger Pigeon (Ectopistes migratorius), Pilose Crayfish (Pacifastacus gambelii), and Rocky Mountain Locust (Melanoplus spretus). Designation as a Montana Animal Species of Concern or Potential Animal Species of Concern is not a statutory or regulatory classification. Instead, these designations provide a basis for resource managers and decision-makers to make proactive decisions regarding species conservation and data collection priorities in order to avoid additional extirpations.
    [Show full text]
  • Grasshoppers
    Grasshoppers Orthoptera: Acrididae Plains Lubber Pictured grasshoppers Great crested grasshopper Snakeweed grasshoppers Primary Pest Grasshoppers • Migratory grasshopper • Twostriped grasshopper • Differential grasshopper • Redlegged grasshopper • Clearwinged grasshopper Twostriped Grasshopper, Melanoplus bivittatus Redlegged Grasshopper, Melanoplus femurrubrum Differential Grasshopper, Melanoplus differentialis Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes Clearwinged Grasshopper Camnula pellucida Diagram courtesy of Alexandre Latchininsky, University of Wyoming Photograph courtesy of Jean-Francoise Duranton, CIRAD Grasshoppers lay pods of eggs below ground Grasshopper Egg Pods Molting is not for wimps! Grasshopper Nymphs Some grasshoppers found in winter and early spring Velvet-striped grasshopper – a common spring species Grasshopper Controls • Weather (rainfall mediated primarily) • Natural enemies – Predators, diseases • Treatment of breeding areas • Biological controls • Row covers Temperature and rainfall are important mortality factors Grasshoppers and Rainfall Moisture prior to egg hatch generally aids survival – Newly hatched young need succulent foliage Moisture after egg hatch generally reduces problems – Assists spread of diseases – Allows for plenty of food, reducing competition for rangeland and crops Grasshopper predators Robber Flies Larvae of many blister beetles develop on grasshopper egg pods Blister beetle larva Fungus-killed Grasshoppers Pathogen: Entomophthora grylli Mermis nigrescens, a nematode parasite of grasshoppers
    [Show full text]
  • Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley
    Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Series I. Correspondence, 1871-1894 Box 1 Folder 1 Darwin to Riley. June 1, 1871. Letter from Charles Darwin to Riley thanking him for report and instructions on noxious insects. Downs, Beckerham, Kent (England). (handwritten copy of original). Box 1 Folder 2 Koble to Riley. June 30, 1874. Letter from John C. Koble giving physical description of chinch bugs and explaining how the bugs are destroying corn crops in western Kentucky. John C. Koble of L. S. Trimble and Co., Bankers. Box 1 Folder 3 Saunders to Riley. Nov. 12, 1874. William Saunders receipt to C. V. Riley for a copy of descriptions of two insects that baffle the vegetable carnivora. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D. C. Box 1 Folder 4 Young to Riley. Dec. 13, 1874. William Young describes the flat-headed borer and its effects on orchards during summer and winter seasons. From Palmyra Gate Co., Nebraska. Box 1 Folder 5 Saunders to Riley. Dec. 22, 1874. William Saunders receipt of notes of investigation on the insects associated with Sarracenia. William Saunders, Department of Agriculture, Washington, D.C. Box 1 Folder 6 Bonhaw to Riley. Jan. 19, 1875. L. N. Bonhaw requesting a copy of his Missouri report, for him to establish a manual or handbook on entomology, and to find out about an insect that deposits eggs. Subject: tomato worm, hawk moth. 1 http://www.nal.usda.gov/speccoll/ Special Collections at the National Agricultural Library: Charles Valentine Riley Collection Box 1 Folder 7 Holliday to Riley.
    [Show full text]
  • Plistorioeil Revie^Kr
    Plistorioeil Revie^Kr The State Historical Society of Missouri COLUMBIA, MISSOURI BOARD OF EDITORS LAWRENCE 0. CHRISTENSEN SUSAN M. HARTMANN University of Missouri-Rolla Ohio State University, Columbus WILLIAM E. FOLEY ALAN R. HAVIG Central Missouri State University, Stephens College, Warrensburg Columbia JEAN TYREE HAMILTON DAVID D. MARCH Marshall Kirksville ARVARH E. STRICKLAND University of Missouri-Columbia COVER DESCRIPTION: This 1943 oil painting, Simi Valley, California (\5lA" x 23"), by Fred Shane is a recent gift to the State Historical Society from Harry and Ann Cohen of Columbia. Shane (1906- 1990), a noted artist and educator, taught art at the University of Missouri-Columbia for thirty- seven years. Most major museums in the nation have exhibited his work. The painting is a welcome addition to the Society's holdings of Shane paint­ ings and drawings and will be displayed periodical­ ly in the Art Gallery. Gallery hours are 8:30 A.M. to 4:00 P.M., Monday through Friday. MISSOURI HISTORICAL REVIEW Published Quarterly by THE STATE HISTORICAL SOCIETY OF MISSOURI COLUMBIA, MISSOURI JAMES W. GOODRICH EDITOR LYNN WOLF GENTZLER ASSOCIATE EDITOR LEONA S. MORRIS RESEARCH ASSISTANT Copyright © 1992 by the State Historical Society of Missouri 1020 Lowry Street, Columbia, Missouri 65201 The Missouri Historical Review (ISSN 0026-6582) is owned by The State Historical Society of Missouri and is published quarterly at 10 South Hitt, Columbia, Missouri 65201. Send communications, business and editorial correspondence and change of address to the State Historical Society of Missouri, 1020 Lowry Street, Columbia, MO 65201. Second class postage is paid at Columbia, Missouri.
    [Show full text]
  • <I>Melanoplus Sanguinipes</I> (Fab.)
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects Entomology, Department of 2016 The iologB y, Ecology, and Management of the Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fab.) Dewey W. Murray USDA-APHIS and University of Nebraska-Lincoln Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entodistmasters Part of the Entomology Commons Murray, Dewey W., "The ioB logy, Ecology, and Management of the Migratory Grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fab.)" (2016). Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects. 13. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entodistmasters/13 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Distance Master of Science in Entomology Projects by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. The Biology, Ecology and Management of the Migratory grasshopper, Melanoplus sanguinipes (Fab.). Dewey W. Murray1 USDA-APHIS, Phoenix, Arizona 85040; email: [email protected] Keywords Rangeland, suppression treatments, economic species, flight, outbreaks, economic threshold, population dynamics. Abstract Grasshoppers have caused significant damage to crops of farmers and rangeland forage of ranchers throughout history. Populations of grasshoppers can build and explode with exponential growth under the right climatic factors and habitat. Melanoplus sanguinipes is the most economic species of grasshopper in the United States. The migratory flight capabilities is very similar to true locusts. This species as been known to travel distances of over 500 miles. Millions of dollars in damage occurs to crops and rangeland annually in the United States due to this species and other economic grasshopper species.
    [Show full text]
  • The Past, Present, and Future of Rangeland Grasshopper Management
    RANGELANDS 22(2) 24 The Past, Present, and Future of Rangeland Grasshopper Management KERRI M. SKINNER Knowledge is power in protecting our crops against A troubled history the ravages of a tiny insect, as in all other undertak - Grasshoppers and humans have been at cross purposes since ings; and according as accurate knowledge regarding the earliest days of agriculture. Most early records of this locust plague is disseminated among our people, grasshopper problems in America can be ascribed to one will they be able to vanquish the common foe.—C.V. species: Melanoplus spretus (Walsh), the Rocky Mountain Riley, 1877 grasshopper or locust. Unlike other North American species, Grasshoppers have undoubtedly made large historical im- M. spretus periodically formed swarms which moved between pacts on the rangelands of the United States through their re- permanent breeding grounds in the Rocky Mountain states putedly voracious appetites and sheer numbers. Like other and the fertile farmlands of the Mississippi valley. Six major species whose habits conflict with human interests, efforts to swarms of this species, covering large regions of the Great understand the biology and ecology of grasshoppers have Plains and lasting two or more years, were reported between been driven by the quest for better ways to suppress their 1818 and 1875. The “plague” of 1857 covered 12,000 square numbers. While there are good reasons for this approach to miles, over most of which “every green thing cultivated by grasshopper research, it has not resulted in a thorough under- man was consumed” (Riley 1877). standing of the biology, ecology, and population dynamics of For reasons which remain largely unknown, the Rocky these insect herbivores, nor the ability to accurately predict or Mountain grasshopper is apparently extinct.
    [Show full text]
  • Destructivo Locusts
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE. DIVISION OE ENTOMOLOGY. BULLETIN NO. 25. DESTRUCTIVO LOCUSTS. A POPULAR CONSIDERATION OF A FEW OF THE MORE INJURIOUS LOCUSTS (OR "GRASSHOP- PERS") OF THE UNITED STATES, TO- GETHER WITH THE BEST MEANS OF DESTROYING THEM. BY C. V. RILEY, M. A., Ph. D., ENTOMOLOGIST. PUBLISHED BY AUTHORITY OE THE SECRETARY OK AGRICULTURE. WASHINGTON: GOVERNMENT PRINTING OF F I C E. I 89 I . CONTENTS. Page. Letter of submittal 5 Introduction 7 The Kooky Mountain Locust 0 Bange of species Í) Destructive appearances 10 Lile history and habits 10 Where the eggs are laid 10 Manner in which the eggs are laid 12 Philosophy of the egg-mass 13 Number of egg-masses laid by a single i emulo 14 The hatching process 15 Where and under what conditions of soil the young hatch most frceiy. 18 Time of hatching 18 Habits of the young or unhedged locusts in the temporary region ID Directions in which the young locusts travel 21 Kate at which the young travel 22 They reach, in the temporary region, but a few miles east, of where they hatch 22 Kate at which locust swarms move 23 Direction of invading swarms 24 Time of appearance of invading swarms 25 Number of broods; peculiarities of habit 25 Hibernation 26 The Lesser Migratory locust 26 Bau go of species 26 Destructive appearances 27 Life history and habits 27 The Non-Migratory Bed-legged Locust 27 Bango of the species 27 Destructive appearances 28 Life history and habits „ 28 The California Devastating Locust 28 Bange of the species 28 Destructive appearances 21) Life history and habits 30 The Differential Locust 30 Bange of the species 30 Destructive appearances 30 Life history and habits 31 The Two-striped Locust 31 Bange of species 31 Destiuctive appearances 31 Life history and habits 32 Tage.
    [Show full text]
  • Gunslingers of Extinction Ben Bowers
    Gunslingers of Extinction Ben Bowers Longjaw cisco sounds like the name of a gunslinger from a John Wayne western. But it was just a type of deep water whitefish in the Great Lakes sought after by fisherman. The fish were most abundantly harvested in the 1930s when they were smoked and sold to the masses, presumably fueling the economies of the region and filling many dinner tables. But overfishing, pollution, and predation from introduced species eventually led to its inclusion as a member of the first class of federally protected endangered species in 1967. However, by the 1980s, fishermen weren’t even pulling any nets up to throw back into the water. It was declared extinct in 1983, just a few years after John Wayne died himself. ~ The American mastodon went extinct about 11,000 years ago. They roamed North America in search of twigs and grasses to munch, but often found tar pits and saber-toothed cats and hunters that consumed the mastodons instead. An important source of meat to our distant ancestors, the glorious hunts and mastodon feasts were probably recounted fondly for generations, before the stories were seen as only old fairy tales or simply forgotten. It wasn’t until the 1700s that the bones of a mastodon were “discovered” by people who might have descended from the hunters who probably killed and ate the last one. ~ The Falls-of-the-Ohio scurfpea was a plant native to Rock Island along the Ohio River. It was thought to be commonly eaten by the American Bison, which had been killed off in the area by the early 1800s.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings of the United States National Museum
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE UNITED STATES NATIONAL MUSEUM issued SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION U. S. NATIONAL MUSEUM Vol. no Washington : 1959 No. 3416 GRASSHOPPERS OF THE MEXICANUS GROUP, GENUS MELANOPLUS (ORTHOPTERA; ACRIDIDAE) By Ashley B. Gurney ^ and A. R. Brooks Introduction Since the historic outbreaks of the Rocky Mountain grasshopper (Melanoplus spretus (Walsh)) in the 1870's, the close relatives of that species, especially the one recently called M. mexicanus (Saussure), have been of great economic importance in the United States and Canada. The present study was undertaken to clarify the status of the various taxonomic entities in this complex, and we hope it will stimulate further clarifying studies. We have also attempted to summarize briefly the more important information on the biology of each species. For many years the status of spretus has been a puzzle to ento- mologists because no specimens have been collected since the early 1900's. Gradually the opinion developed that spretus disappeared because it was the migratory phase of a normally solitary grasshopper, and it was supposed that mexicanus was that species. Om* study of • Entomology Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture. ' Entomology Section, Canada Department of Agriculture Research Laboratory, Saskatoon, Saskatche- wan, Canada. 1 477119—59 1 : 2 PROCEEDESTGS OF THE NATIONAL MUSEUM vol. no the aedeagus indicates that spretus is a distinct species. Any further evidence bearing on this opinion naturally is very desirable. It is chiefly on the basis of the differences in the aedeagus that mexicanus has been found to be distinct from the species commonly misidentified as M.
    [Show full text]
  • From Numerous to Non-Existent: Common, Rare, Threatened, Endangered, and Extinct Species in the Collections of the Natural Science Research Laboratory
    Exhibit Dates: July 2013 – September 2014 From Numerous to Non-existent: Common, Rare, Threatened, Endangered, and Extinct Species in the Collections of the Natural Science Research Laboratory The Museum’s Natural Science Research Laboratory (NSRL), maintains collections of preserved mammal, bird, and invertebrate specimens, and frozen tissues of these specimens, for scientific research and education purposes. These collections represent a record of the natural history of Texas, North America, and other areas of the world. Of the 2,331 mammal and bird species represented in the NSRL’s collections, at least 197 currently are listed as at risk on either the Endangered Species list of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) or on the Red List of Threatened Species of the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). Where Did These Specimens Come From? Most of the specimens in the NSRL collections represent abundant and widespread species that were collected from the wild for scientific research. Proper government authority and collecting permits are required and obtained for all such studies. Many of the threatened and endangered animal specimens on display were donated to the Museum by individuals or by other museums. Most of these specimens are several decades old, and they were collected long before the species was at risk. Other rare specimens were donated to the Museum by zoological parks after the animal's natural death. None of the specimens in the NSRL collections that currently are recognized as at risk were collected from the wild while the species had protected status. The Endangered Species Act – 40 Years of Protecting At Risk Animals and Plants The passage of the Endangered Species Act in 1973 gave the USFWS the authority to recognize plant and animal species as threatened or endangered, and to develop recovery plans for these species.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation of Grasshoppers ______26 Endangered______26 Translocations and Re-Introductions ______27
    White, Black, and Grey: The Role of Human Perception in Grasshopper Management Strategies By April Andujar University of Colorado at Boulder A thesis submitted to the University of Colorado at Boulder in partial fulfillment to receive Honors designation in Environmental Studies May 2013 Thesis Advisors: Professor Cesar Nufio, EBIO, Committee Chair Professor Dale Miller, ENVS Professor Herbert Covert, ANTH ©2013 by April Andujar All rights reserved Acknowledgments I wish to thank Professor J.A. Lockwood, of the University of Wyoming, Laramie, for his contributions to the field of grasshopper research and his valuable input on my survey questions. I also wish to thank all of my advisors at CU Boulder for their support and contributions to the development of my thesis. i Contents Acknowledgments _____________________________________________________________ i Abstract ____________________________________________________________________ iv Introduction _________________________________________________________________ 1 Background__________________________________________________________________ 3 Biology of Orthoptera ______________________________________________________________ 3 Feeding habitats___________________________________________________________________ 4 History and range__________________________________________________________________ 5 Significance of Biology ______________________________________________________________ 6 Grassland ecosystem and grasshoppers ___________________________________________ 6 Food web in grasslands
    [Show full text]