DOCSLIB.ORG

Early Molokan Struggles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EARLY MOLOKAN STRUGGLES FROM THE SPIRIT AND LIFE - BOOK OF THE SUN Published by THE CHURCH OF THE YOUNG PEOPLE November 2, 1942 Supervised by: ELIK PHILIP SHUBIN Translation by: PETE A. WRENN WILLIAM A. SHUBIN Corrections by: ALEX F. WRENN JOHN J. KASHERGEN Reprinted 1999 by the Molokan Conscientious Objector Advisory Board Revised 2002 for CD. 2 This booklet is a brief history of the Russian Religious Sect known as Spiritual Christian Jumpers, "Molokans". To better acquaint our young Molokan generation in the knowledge of our faith, its struggles, and sufferings for existence. Also to show herein how a true Christian Spiritual Jumper stood firm on the teachings of our Lord God, Jesus Christ, our Savior and the Holy Spirit. All the facts contained herein have been taken from the book "Spirit and Life". 2 3 SPIRIT AND LIFE - BOOK OF THE SUN Our forefathers, of Russian origin, living in central Russia, were forced to attend the Greek-Orthodox Russian Orthodox Church in the early days of the Russian settlement. From all outward appearances they seemed to submit to the Greek-Orthodox faith; yet with the inner man (their souls) our forefathers believed in the one and only Almighty God, and not in the wooden or stone icons or idols. In obeying the commandments of God, Spiritual Christians (Molokans), do not obey man-made laws that contradict the Holy Bible. The following are some of these commandments: There shall be no man-made Gods before me, slavery, taking of oaths, preparation or training for wars. Because of their faith and belief in the Holy Scriptures and in the living God, they were forced to suffer persecutions and tortures, even unto unseen depths. Through the wisdom and Spiritual Guidance of God Almighty, they could no longer keep this Spiritual Light and Wisdom a secret; but had to preach the truth of this living faith of God Almighty. Therefore, they had to free themselves from the Greek-Orthodox Church and all of its religious rites. From the forced eating of pork (taxed by the church), and other unclean foods which are pro- hibited by the Old and the New Testament. Where it also is stated, the icon (idol) is not God; and pork is unclean (not meat). For their refusal to partake of unclean foods, and to participate in the worship of idols and icons, they were brought before priests of the Orthodox Church, and charged with failure to attend the Orthodox Church, and of abiding by the church laws. With disregard for age or sex, they were seized and brutally tortured, horsewhipped, beaten with clubs and stoned. Many were left mutilated or crippled for the rest of their lives. Many died from these horrible punishments. Those that survived had their nose or other features cut off, branded like cattle, half of their heads and beards shaven, shackled and sent off to various prisons, where the wardens were instructed to put them to murderous labors. Some of the elders were banished to far off frozen corners of Siberia, where even animals rarely survive. Others were taken into slavery for life, some to be used as stakes in card games or other games of chance. The women were forced to milk swine: some were forced to feed young dogs and bear cubs from their own breasts. Young children that were left were sent to institutions and orphanages, where they were taught against their will the faith of the Orthodox Church. Even these diabolical treatments could not shake our forefathers from their faith in the living Almighty God. Semeon Matveich Uklein and Mathew Semeonovich Dalmatoff taught our people to coordinate their efforts in fulfilling their scriptural beliefs. They were among the first to come forth in open disagreement against the Orthodox Church. By the gracious mercy of God, and the guidance of the Holy Spirit, our people were sent in a need for freedom to worship God and to interpret His Scriptures as they should be. They went from village to village teaching the true meanings of the Bible. Through their teachings many people were converted to this new faith, Spiritual Christians. In the Greek-Russian Church there are certain days when eating of meat, or drinking of milk are prohibitory. Our people, refusing to abide by these man-made laws, ate meat and drank milk at all times. It is thereby that the name Molokan or "milk drinkers" was given our people in the year of 1765, which we bear to this very day. 3 4 This Spirit filled the hearts of our elders, namely Peter Zhurovtzoff, Maxim Losev, and Mathew Mote- lev, who personally went to the Tsar with documents for pardon, freedom and religious rights. The Document as follows: THE PETITION To His Imperial Highness the Tsar of all Russia, Alexander Pavlovich, Your Honor: Since early times we upheld in secret the sect of sincere faith of the Spiritual Christians named by the common people, "Molokans". Founded by our ancestors and forefathers from the word of the Holy Bible given by the Lord God to his servant Moses on Mount Sinai, commandments and laws of justification only for the people of Israel; but in the name of Jesus Christ to open the way for the people that are living under the heavenly skies. He came in the later ages of Israel, born of the Virgin Mary, as a person, teaching all that came unto Him the will of the Lord God. Through signs and miracles in raising of the dead and healing people of different types of sickness. In the end bearing the sufferings of the Cross, on which he died for the sins of all mankind. On the third day he rose from the dead, according to the scriptures, appearing among his disciples after a certain time. He rose to the Heaven with the understanding that he will return to judge the living and the dead. His disciples by His instruction were to wait the fulfillment of His promise of the Holy Spirit, by the Holy Father. Upon receiving this gift, the Apostles preached His word to all corners of the universe. Writing the preaching of the New Testament, the Acts of the Holy Apostles, and the Revelation, Apostle John combined the Old and the New Testament together, which we now know as the Bible, which for many years was forgotten, although it was not forbidden to read it, even though it was hard to understand its writings. For the reason that it did not contain any headings, paragraphs or references. Remaining misunderstood for many years, even though it was re-examined and printed. Until the days of Queen Katerina Alekseevna, (Catherine the Great) who gave orders to print it in Moscow in 1513, it was not available to the common people of Russia. Now you lighted the lights of the hearts of all our people in our dear fatherland. Shining this light of God, through the Holy Scriptures, teachings from it was like the spreading of the waters of the ocean. This treasure being kept a secret for ages, until it appeared in our beloved Russia. For this has been the wish of our Lord God. Your attention is called to the fact that in all of the Holy Bible writings, nowhere does it say there exists a likeness of which one should bow to; or to portray an image of heavenly, earthly or unearthly likeness. Only to the one and only God Almighty, His Son Jesus Christ and the Holy Spirit. It does not say in the scriptures that one should bow to man-made images (icons), or to assume upon one's self the sign of the Cross. All of this is strictly forbidden by the Holy Scriptures. So today the time compels us to open up your Royal Highness this secret, withheld by us since early ages. Since the reign of Prince Alexei Mihailovich (1645), and even to this day this secret was withheld from the knowledge of former monarchs and governors, provincial noblemen, district judges, even to the official priests and their parish. Wherever we gathered to read the Holy Bible or give prayer to God, instantly the priests and their parish would notify the police authorities. Who without pity would beat up, chain and handcuff, put in prison, sentenced to rigorous labors and severe punishment. These unbearable conditions forced us to bring to the attention of Your Highness, the cruel treatments of ancient time of Greece and Rome, identical to those of today. Scattering of families and innocent peoples. 4 5 The elders are banished, the youths forced into armed forces and young children arc given to var- ious institutes. Babies are taken away from the breasts of their mothers and sent to orphanages. To weaken one, heavy taxes, with severe penalties and fines are resorted to. For these reasons we ask you, all merciful ruler, to look upon your humiliated servants. Enter into this consideration of our un- fortunate lives, from these evil, abusive and forever scornful people. We are asking you with tears in our eyes, in the name of all our sufferers, let us be with our own convictions. So that we can establish firmly our ceremonies based upon the Holy Bible; and also on the thirty points, which were formally presented by the two Dukhabor delegates, in the times of Queen Katerina. They in place of receiving mercy, bore great punishment being sent to all parts of Siberia. But we, who are Spiritual Christians, hid away from fear of penalties, into the depths of obscurity, even to the days of the rule of Your Highness.
Recommended publications
  • Pacifism and Apocalyptic Discourse Among Russian Spiritual Christian Molokan-Jumpers

    Pacifism and Apocalyptic Discourse Among Russian Spiritual Christian Molokan-Jumpers

    Church History 80:1 (March 2011), 109–138. © American Society of Church History, 2011 doi:10.1017/S0009640710001587 The Woman Clothed in the Sun: Pacifism and Apocalyptic Discourse among Russian Spiritual Christian Molokan-Jumpers J. EUGENE CLAY ITH its violent images of heavenly and earthly combat, the book of Revelation has been criticized for promoting a vengeful and Wdistorted version of Christ’s teachings. Gerd Lüdemann, for example, has attacked the book as part of the “dark side of the Bible,” and Jonathan Kirsch believes that the pernicious influence of Revelation “can be detected in some of the worst atrocities and excesses of every age, including our own.”1 Yet, surprisingly, nonviolent pacifists have also drawn on the Apocalypse for encouragement and support. This was especially true for generations of Russian Spiritual Christians (dukhovnye khristiane), a significant religious minority whose roots trace at least as far back as the 1760s, when the first “spirituals” (dukhovnye) were arrested and tried in Russia’s southern provinces of Tambov and Voronezh. Although they drew upon apocalyptic martial imagery, the Spiritual Christians were pacifists, some of whom came to identify themselves with the Woman Clothed in the Sun of Revelation 12. Spiritual Christians refused to recognize the sacraments, clergy, and icons of the state church; rather than kiss and bow to icons, they kissed and bowed to one another, and thus venerated human beings, who were the true image—or Research for this article was supported by the Pew Evangelical Scholars Initiative, by seed grants from the Institute for Humanities Research and the Center for the Study of Religion and Conflict at Arizona State University, and by the International Research and Exchanges Board with funds provided by the U.S.
  • In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    In the Lands of the Romanovs: an Annotated Bibliography of First-Hand English-Language Accounts of the Russian Empire

    ANTHONY CROSS In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of The Russian Empire (1613-1917) OpenBook Publishers To access digital resources including: blog posts videos online appendices and to purchase copies of this book in: hardback paperback ebook editions Go to: https://www.openbookpublishers.com/product/268 Open Book Publishers is a non-profit independent initiative. We rely on sales and donations to continue publishing high-quality academic works. In the Lands of the Romanovs An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917) Anthony Cross http://www.openbookpublishers.com © 2014 Anthony Cross The text of this book is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license (CC BY 4.0). This license allows you to share, copy, distribute and transmit the text; to adapt it and to make commercial use of it providing that attribution is made to the author (but not in any way that suggests that he endorses you or your use of the work). Attribution should include the following information: Cross, Anthony, In the Land of the Romanovs: An Annotated Bibliography of First-hand English-language Accounts of the Russian Empire (1613-1917), Cambridge, UK: Open Book Publishers, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.11647/ OBP.0042 Please see the list of illustrations for attribution relating to individual images. Every effort has been made to identify and contact copyright holders and any omissions or errors will be corrected if notification is made to the publisher. As for the rights of the images from Wikimedia Commons, please refer to the Wikimedia website (for each image, the link to the relevant page can be found in the list of illustrations).
  • Maksim Gavrilovich Rudomyotkin, Molokan Messianic King1

    Maksim Gavrilovich Rudomyotkin, Molokan Messianic King1

    Maksim Gavrilovich Rudomyotkin, Molokan Messianic King1 William John Samarin / Василий Иванич Самарин* © 2016 William J. Samarin The beginning He was born about two hundred years ago. This would be in 1817; others say in 1823 (or about 1832). Agreed is that this was in the village of Algasovo (existing today about 100 km north of the city of Tambov), the district of Morshansk, in the Russian province (oblast’) of Tambov that borders on the Volga River. He was given the name Maksim, his patronymic was Gavrilovich (the son of Gavril), and his family name was Rudomyotkin (transliterated Rudomëtkin from the Cyrillic). The family may already have been dissident from the Orthodox Church, the adults members of the Khlysty sect or the Molokan one (accounts vary).2 Attracted * It is a pleasure to acknowledge with gratitude the hospitality of Andrei J. and Tatiana Conovaloff and of Michael P. and Stella Lediaev and for the unlimited time that was given to discussing the Molokan religion in its derivative forms and in particular Maksim Gavrilovich Rudomyotkin. Mr Conovaloff, the administrator of www.molokane.org, is the most accomplished researcher on anything that might be relevant to the topic ‘Molokan.’ Mr Lediaev provided me with copies of several documents he had prepared about Rudomyotkin and on other matters that had relevance to the two-hundredth anniversary in 2005 of the origin of the Molokan faith. He also generously answered questions I put to him while writing this work. Other individuals prefer to remain anonymous. ― The author of this essay was born and reared in the Los Angeles community less than twenty years after it was created and participated voluntarily in all religious and para-religious events.
  • Russia's Imperial Encounter with Armenians, 1801-1894

    Russia's Imperial Encounter with Armenians, 1801-1894

    CLAIMING THE CAUCASUS: RUSSIA’S IMPERIAL ENCOUNTER WITH ARMENIANS, 1801-1894 Stephen B. Riegg A dissertation submitted to the faculty at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Department of History. Chapel Hill 2016 Approved by: Louise McReynolds Donald J. Raleigh Chad Bryant Cemil Aydin Eren Tasar © 2016 Stephen B. Riegg ALL RIGHTS RESERVED ii ABSTRACT Stephen B. Riegg: Claiming the Caucasus: Russia’s Imperial Encounter with Armenians, 1801-1894 (Under the direction of Louise McReynolds) My dissertation questions the relationship between the Russian empire and the Armenian diaspora that populated Russia’s territorial fringes and navigated the tsarist state’s metropolitan centers. I argue that Russia harnessed the stateless and dispersed Armenian diaspora to build its empire in the Caucasus and beyond. Russia relied on the stature of the two most influential institutions of that diaspora, the merchantry and the clergy, to project diplomatic power from Constantinople to Copenhagen; to benefit economically from the transimperial trade networks of Armenian merchants in Russia, Persia, and Turkey; and to draw political advantage from the Armenian Church’s extensive authority within that nation. Moving away from traditional dichotomies of power and resistance, this dissertation examines how Russia relied on foreign-subject Armenian peasants and elites to colonize the South Caucasus, thereby rendering Armenians both agents and recipients of European imperialism. Religion represented a defining link in the Russo-Armenian encounter and therefore shapes the narrative of my project. Driven by a shared ecumenical identity as adherents of Orthodox Christianity, Armenians embraced Russian patronage in the early nineteenth century to escape social and political marginalization in the Persian and Ottoman empires.
  • The Historical Parameters of Russian Religious Toleration

    The Historical Parameters of Russian Religious Toleration

    THE HISTORICAL PARAMETERS OF RUSSIAN RELIGIOUS TOLERATION Nicholas B. Breyfogle The Ohio State University The National Council for Eurasian and East European Research 910 17th Street, N.W. Suite 300 Washington, D.C. 20006 TITLE VIII PROGRAM Project Information* Principal Investigator: Nicholas Breyfogle Council Contract Number: 815-02g Date: July 27, 2001 Copyright Information Scholars retain the copyright on works they submit to NCEEER. However, NCEEER possesses the right to duplicate and disseminate such products, in written and electronic form, as follows: (a) for its internal use; (b) to the U.S. Government for its internal use or for dissemination to officials of foreign governments; and (c) for dissemination in accordance with the Freedom of Information Act or other law or policy of the U.S. government that grants the public access to documents held by the U.S. government. Additionally, NCEEER has a royalty-free license to distribute and disseminate papers submitted under the terms of its agreements to the general public, in furtherance of academic research, scholarship, and the advancement of general knowledge, on a non-profit basis. All papers distributed or disseminated shall bear notice of copyright. Neither NCEEER, nor the U.S. Government, nor any recipient of a Contract product may use it for commercial sale. * The work leading to this report was supported in part by contract or grant funds provided by the National Council for Eurasian and East European Research, funds which were made available by the U.S. Department of State under Title VIII (The Soviet-East European Research and Training Act of 1983, as amended).
  • Armenia 2019 International Religious Freedom Report

    Armenia 2019 International Religious Freedom Report

    ARMENIA 2019 INTERNATIONAL RELIGIOUS FREEDOM REPORT Executive Summary The constitution states that everyone has freedom of thought, conscience, and religion. It recognizes the Armenian Apostolic Church (AAC) as the national church and preserver of national identity but also establishes separation of “religious organizations” and the state. The law prohibits, but does not define, proselytism, which may be interpreted as forced conversion. The trial continued of a prominent Baha’i lawyer, charged in 2017 with organizing illegal migration to the country. Baha’i community members said they believed the charges were brought because of his religion. According to the Alternative Report to the UN Committee on the Rights of the Child With A Focus on Yezidi Children in Armenia, minority children were frequently deprived of their freedom to practice their religion and faced challenges in preserving and expressing their ethnic and religious identities. The 2018 dismissal of a police officer for being a member of a religious organization triggered a Constitutional Court review of the laws prohibiting police officers’ membership in religious organizations. There were reports the government arbitrarily enforced the law, targeting police officers affiliated with minority religious groups. Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan spoke about the importance of freedom of religion and established a working group to review AAC-government relations, the public-school curriculum on the history of the Armenian Church, and other issues. Some AAC representatives objected to the review, describing the process as a threat to Armenian national identity. In September, built with private funds on private land, the world’s largest Yezidi temple opened in Aknalich Village, Armavir Region.
  • Number 99 Caucasian Armenia Between Imperial A1\Id

    Number 99 Caucasian Armenia Between Imperial A1\Id

    NUMBER 99 CAUCASIAN ARMENIA BETWEEN IMPERIAL A1\ID SOVIET RULE: THE INTERLUDE OF NATIONAL INDEPENDENCE Richard G. Hovannisian University· of California, Los Angeles Conference on "NATIONALISM AND SOCIAL CHA.c"TGE IN TRANSCAUCASIA" Co-sponsored by Kennan Institute for Advanced Russian Studies, The Wilson Center and American Association for the Advancement of Slavic Studies April 24-25, 1980 Caucasian P~enia Between Imperial and Soviet Rule The Interlude of National Independence Richard G. Hovannisian University of California, Los Angeles Cut adrift from central Russia by the revolutions of 1917, Transcaucasia broke apart into three national republics in 1918. The attempts of the Georgians, Azerbaijanis, and Armenians to organize independent states ultimately failed, however, and by mid-1921 the whole region had been absorbed into the Soviet system. Still, it was upon the foundations of those imperfect, transitory states that the Soviet republics of AZerbaijan, Armenia, and Georgia emerged. The Russian Communist Party's deviation in adopting the principle of a federated state structure was required in part to counteract the influence of the nationalist parties and the draw of national sentiment in the successionist provinces. For the Armenians, the transformation of their independent republic into a Soviet national republic remains especially significant, in view of the fact that only on that small sector of the historic Armenian territories has national life and even presence continued since 1920. Although the three independent Transcaucasian states had many common features, the Armenian republic could be singled out for its enormous comparative disadvantages and its association with the geographically and politically broader Armenian question - a question that had ruffled the table of international diplomacy for four decades.
  • Elements of Molokan Culture in the Kars Region Within the Context of Cultural Geography and Cultural Tourism

    Elements of Molokan Culture in the Kars Region Within the Context of Cultural Geography and Cultural Tourism

    GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites Year XIII, vol. 29, no. 2, 2020, p.597-613 ISSN 2065-1198, E-ISSN 2065-0817 DOI 10.30892/gtg.29217-492 ELEMENTS OF MOLOKAN CULTURE IN THE KARS REGION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY AND CULTURAL TOURISM Şaban ÇELİKOĞLU* Zonguldak Bülent Ecevit University, Ereğli Faculty of Education, Department of Turkish and Social Sciences Education, Kdz. Eregli, Zonguldak, Turkey, e-mail: [email protected] Evren ATIŞ Kastamonu University, Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Department of Geography, Kastamonu, Turkey, e-mail: [email protected] Citation: Çelikoğlu Ş. & Atış E. (2020). ELEMENTS OF MOLOKAN CULTURE IN THE KARS REGION WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF CULTURAL GEOGRAPHY AND CULTURAL TOURISM. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 29(2), 597-613. https://doi.org/10.30892/gtg.29217-492 Abstract: In the present study, traces of the Molokan culture in the Kars region have been discussed in term of human-locality interaction. In this context; what the reasons that forced the Molokan to migrate from Russia to Kars were, what kind of cultural traces they left during their stay in the region, and which communities they interacted with in the region were all examine. Furthermore, it was aimed to produce answers to the questions such as what the cultural elements starting with the Molokans in the region and surviving in the present day were, how the existing Molokan cultural elements could be evaluated in the context of cultural tourism. For this purpose, the villages of Çakmak, Boğatepe, İncesu, Porsuklu and Yalınçayır where the Molokans lived densely, were selected as a sample and observation trips were organized to these villages.
  • U·M·I University Microfilms Inlernatlonal a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road

    U·M·I University Microfilms Inlernatlonal a Bell & Howell Information Company 300 North Zeeb Road

    The Russian Molokan Colony at Guadalupe, Baja California: Continuity and change in a sectarian community. Item Type text; Dissertation-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Muranaka, Therese Adams. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 04/10/2021 14:00:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/186102 INFORMATION TO USERS This manuscript has been reproduced from the Ecrofilm master. UMI films the text directly from the original or copy submitted. Thus, some thesis and dissertation copies are in typewriter face, while others may be from any type of computer printer. The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. Broken or indistinct print, colored or poor quality illustrations and photographs, print bleed through, substand~Id margins, and improper alignment can adversely affect reproduction. In the unlikely event that the author did not send UMI a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these wili be noted. Also, if unauthorized copyright material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Oversize materials (e.g., maps, drawings, charts) are reproduced by sectioning the original, beginning at the upper left-hand corner and continuing from left to right in equal sections with small overlaps. Each original is also photographed in one exposure and is included in reduced form at the back of the book.
  • Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 10:41:18AM Via Free Access

    Downloaded from Brill.Com09/23/2021 10:41:18AM Via Free Access

    central asian affairs 4 (2017) 358-383 brill.com/caa From Once-Dominant Minority to Historical Christian Outpost on the Southern Caspian: Azerbaijan’s Orthodox Christians Bruno De Cordier Department of Conflict and Development Studies under the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences of Ghent University, Campus Aula-Oude School [email protected] Cristina Boboc Department of Conflict and Development Studies under the Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, Ghent University, Campus Aula-Oude School [email protected] Abstract Based on field observations and an empirical survey on religion and identity that was conducted among the Slavic Orthodox population in the wider Baku area and in Ganja, this article examines the identity and social position of this community, now the country’s main Christian population group. While earlier research on the nominally Christian Slavic groups in the Caspian–Central Asian space tended to concentrate on ethnolinguistic and political issues, this research focuses on religious identification, religious practice, and the status of the Orthodox Church. Numbering just 1.5 percent of the population, the Orthodox Christian community in Azerbaijan is nearing extinc- tion due to its aging membership. Nonetheless, Orthodox Christianity will keep a pres- ence in the country and its society, although it could attract a more heterogeneous following. Keywords Azerbaijan – Christian minorities in Islamic societies – Orthodox Christianity – Slavic minorities in Soviet successor states – social identity – Southern Caucasus-Caspian © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, 2017 | doi 10.1163/22142290-00404003Downloaded from Brill.com09/23/2021 10:41:18AM via free access <UN> Azerbaijan’s Orthodox Christians 359 … Reactionaries and Marxists will both live as uncomfortably in future society.
  • Dissenters and Prisoners (Raskolniki I Ostrozhniki), by Feodor Vasilivich Livanov, a Translation from the Russian, Originally Published in 5 Volumes, St

    Dissenters and Prisoners (Raskolniki I Ostrozhniki), by Feodor Vasilivich Livanov, a Translation from the Russian, Originally Published in 5 Volumes, St

    DISSENTERS AND PRISONERS Feodor Vasilivich Livanov Selections dealing with the origin and history, theology and beliefs, traditions and worship, community and domestic life, and personal conduct, of the early Spiritual Christian Molokans of Russia. This volume contains selections from Dissenters and Prisoners (Raskolniki i Ostrozhniki), by Feodor Vasilivich Livanov, a translation from the Russian, originally published in 5 volumes, St. Petersburg, Russia. Volume 1, 1872 edition. Volume 2, 1872 edition. Volume 3, 1872 edition. Volume 4, 1873 edition. Volume 5, 1875 edition. Translated and published by Daniel H. Shubin. Bible selections are based on the New King James Bible, used by permission, Thomas A. Nelson publishers, Nashville, TN. Since this volume is a translation from the Russian, the English has been modified as necessary to match the original Russian or Slavonic Bible rendering. copyright 1994 Daniel H. Shubin. All rights reserved. Revised for CD, 2002. 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Translator's Preface SELECTIONS FROM DISSENTERS AND PRISONERS 1. The Beginning and Origin of the Molokans and Dukhabors in Russia 2. Molokans of Tambov 3. Molokans of Saratov 4. Molokans of Kherson 5. The Molokan Pastor 6. Molokan Elders 7. The Molokan Liturgy 8. Molokan Weddings 9. Legal Status of Women among the Molokans 10. Molokans of Kharkov 11. Molokans of Simbirsk 12. Molokans of Astrakhan 13. Molokans of Moscow 14. Molokans of Ryazan 15. Molokans of Orlov 16. Molokans of Samar 17. Molokans of Orenburg 18. Molokans of Ekaterinoslav 19. Molokans of Novgorod 20. Molokans of Vladimir 21. Molokans of Tver 22. Molokans of Tavria 23. Oppression of the Molokans of Saratov 24.
  • The Caucasus Under Soviet Rule

    The Caucasus Under Soviet Rule

    The Caucasus Under Soviet Rule The Caucasus is a strategically and economically important region in contempo- rary global affairs. Western interest in the Caucasus has grown rapidly since 1991, fuelled by the admixture of oil politics, great power rivalry, ethnic separatism and terrorism that characterizes the region. However, until now there has been little understanding of how these issues came to assume the importance they have today. This book argues that understanding the Soviet legacy in the region is critical to analysing both the new states of the Transcaucasus and the autonomous territories of the North Caucasus. It examines the impact of Soviet rule on the Caucasus, focusing in particular on the period from 1917 to 1955. Important questions cov- ered include how the Soviet Union created ‘nations’ out of the diverse peoples of the North Caucasus; the true nature of the 1917 revolution; the role and effects of forced migration in the region; how over time the constituent nationalities of the region came to redefine themselves; and how Islamic radicalism came to assume the importance it continues to hold today. A cauldron of war, revolution and foreign interventions – from the British and Ottoman Turks to the oil-hungry armies of Hitler’s Third Reich – the Caucasus and the policies and actors it produced (not least Stalin, ‘Sergo’ Ordzhonikidze and Anastas Mikoian) both shaped the Soviet experiment in the twentieth century and appear set to continue to shape the geopolitics of the twenty-first. Making unprecedented use of memoirs, archives and published sources, this book is an invaluable aid for scholars, political analysts and journalists alike to understanding one of the most important borderlands of the modern world.