DOCSLIB.ORG

A Probabilistic Approach to Design Civil Engineering Structures Gabrielle

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Probabilistic Approach to Design Civil Engineering Structures Gabrielle A probabilistic approach to design civil engineering structures Gabrielle Muller & Gabriele Albertini Semester project Spring term 2015 Professor Jean-Franc¸ois Molinari Supervisor Fabian Barras Computational Solid Mechanics Laboratory -LSMS Ecole Polytechnique Fed´ erale´ de Lausanne -EPFL CONTENTS Introduction 1 I Theoretical considerations and principles of probabilistic approach in civil engineering2 1 about probabilistic and deterministic approach in struc- turedesign 3 1.1 Basic structural design principles 3 1.2 The deterministic approach - The classical approach in civil engi- neering 3 1.3 The probabilistic approach 6 2 mathematical and numerical tools required for a proba- bilistic approach 11 2.1 Define Probability Density Functions and the Monte Carlo method 11 2.2 The Monte Carlo Method 14 2.3 Advantages and limitations of using Monte Carlo 16 II The application of probabilistic theory: from a basic ex- ample in Python to a real structure in Akantu 17 3 anillustrativeexampleofthemontecarlotheoryinpython 18 3.1 Evolution of the accuracy of the results 18 3.2 Study of the accuracy of the Monte Carlo method 23 4 an illustrative example of the monte carlo theory using akantu 28 4.1 Getting started in Akantu 28 4.2 The Model 28 4.3 The analytical method 29 4.4 The Monte Carlo Simulation 29 4.5 Results 29 ii CONTENTS 5 using akantu for an application of the monte carlo the- ory 32 5.1 Introduction 32 5.2 Considerations about the model 33 5.3 The Monte Carlo simulations 39 5.4 Results 40 Conclusion 50 iii INTRODUCTION The goal of this semester project is to study a probabilistic approach to design civil engineering structures. In fact, currently most structural design is done via a deterministic approach, being the easiest, fastest and best-known approach to engineers. Even if deterministic design guarantees a certain structural safety pro- posed by the SIA standard prescriptions, it is of interest to consider a probabilistic approach in order to quantify structural safety and reliability that cannot be as- sessed with a deterministic approach. The differences between deterministic and probabilistic design approached will be studied and consequences for future re- lated work in structural engineering will be drawn. • This report is divided in two parts: – Part 1 is the theoretical part which exposes the concepts of determinis- tic design and probabilistic design in structural engineering and intro- duces the Monte Carlo theory. – Part 2 is the application of the theory and consists in an implemen- tation of the Monte Carlo theory to real examples. Starting from the simple case of a steel bar subjected to axial loading, using open-source software Akantu, we implemented the Monte Carlo theory to assess reliability of an existing dam. The goal was to include probabilistic theory in the frame of dam design principles. • Numerical tools used during this project Throughout this project, we used the Akantu software through a Python interface. Akantu is an open source Finite Element library implemented at the Laboratory of Computational Solid Mechanics (LSMS) at EPFL. Gmsh was used to create the mesh for the dam. • Supervision This project was done within the LSMS at EPFL under the direction of Professor Molinari. The supervision was done by Fabian Barras, who we collaborated closely with throughout the term. 1 Part I. Theoretical considerations and principles of probabilistic approach in civil engineering 2 1 ABOUTPROBABILISTICANDDETERMINISTICAPPROACH INSTRUCTUREDESIGN 1.1 basic structural design principles Most engineering problems can be solved by the confrontation of the two follow- ing quantities: • solicitation or stress S S can be the resulting bending moment in a beam subjected to well-defined loads, deflection of a beam under a given load case or ground solicitation due to external loads. • corresponding capacity or resistance R R can be the ultimate resistant moment of a beam, the maximum allowable deflection for a beam or the shear capacity. Structural safety requires that R > S. Failure occurs whenever R < S. This gen- eral formulation is applicable to most civil engineering problems. (These considerations are directly taken from course support [1]) 1.2 the deterministic approach - the classical approach in civil engineering Currently, deterministic approach is the method most widely used by civil engi- neers when designing structures. Design of structural elements is done as follows: the design value of resistance Rd is compared to the corresponding solicitation value Sd. Structural safety re- quires that Rd > Sd (1) 3 1.2 the deterministic approach - the classical approach in civil engineering The design value Rd is the resistance value R divided by a safety coefficient gR that takes into account simplifications linked to the model, uncertainties and variability of the material properties. The design value Sd takes into account the different scenarios taken into ac- count as well as the corresponding loads. Here again, a safety coefficient gS is defined in order to include simplifications. When designing a building, one has to differentiate between predominant and concomitant effects, inducing different safety factors. However, this differentiation is not relevant in the context of this project and will not be done for the rest of this report. The most characteristic feature of the deterministic approach is the fact both resistance and solicitation are defined by a fixed value, the characteristic value, being the result of multiple considerations and scenarios. In the concept of this fixed value lies the major difference with the probabilistic approach [1]. As a help for structural engineers, the Eurocode and the SIA standards give guidelines about how determining a characteristic value for an action as well as the safety coefficients. The guiding principles of the SIA standards are described in section . 1.2.1 SIA Standard prescriptions for deterministic design • design value of solicitation – characteristic value Sk ∗ generally, the characteristic value corresponds to a the probability of non-exceedance of pt = 1 − p f = 95% in the case of a normal law. This means that there is a probability of 5% for the Sk to be exceeded. – safety factor gS ∗ this factor takes into account the lack of precision of the character- istic load value with the factor g f and the uncertainties linked to the structural analysis gm. Values for both factors are well defined in the Standard. In the case of linear relationship between actions and action effects, the safety factor gS is computed as gS = g f · gm (2) 4 1.2 the deterministic approach - the classical approach in civil engineering ) the design value for solicitation is then defined by equation 3 Sk Sd = (3) gS • design value of resistance is a function of the design values of – material properties Xd – geometric data ad – uncertainties due to the resistance model are taken into account with the safety factor gR and the material properties with the factor gm. gM = gR · gm ) the design value for resistance is defined in 4 Rk Rd = (4) gM The considerations of this entire section are mostly taken from course [1]. 1.2.2 Considerations in relation to the 5% fracture percentile It is interesting to notice that the deterministic design approach is nevertheless based on probabilistic design. Indeed, the characteristic values are determined through a fixed percentile via the normal law distribution (in most cases, but it could theoretically also be another probabilistic law). With respect to this, it is important to mention that the 5% fracile is not a fixed percentile, but depend on the level of reliability that wants to be achieved. The higher the required level, the smaller the resulting fractile and thus the bigger the characteristic value. Moreover, the safety factors given in the Standard for the deterministic approach hide a probabilistic procedure which they were determined with. The methodol- ogy for the determination of these safety factors will be explained in section1.3. ) This deterministic procedure given by the SIA Standards gives reliability to the design and confidence to the engineer in charge of the structural design, but this reliability is not quantified. It only says if yes or no the studied element passes the verification for a given risk scenario, but in any cases it does not give a quantitative sense of how far the structure is close to failure. The deterministic approach may look secure to most engineers and make them pretend to design 5 1.3 the probabilistic approach safe structures, but in reality it does not give a good understanding of the reliabil- ity of the structure. The probabilistic method exposed in 1.3 balances this lack of quantification of reliability and suggests a way to evaluate reliability of structures. According to the different possible verification formats, how can reasonable safety be defined considering uncertainties related to different parameters? Chapter 7,[1] An attempt to answer this question is done in section 1.3. 1.3 the probabilistic approach The major advantage of designing structures with a probabilistic approach is the possibility to quantify the reliability of the structure. Instead of using character- istic values which correspond to upper or lower boundary values, a probabilistic approach allows engineers to quantify the reliability of the designed structures, as opposed to deterministic design which only allows to determine whether yes or no the structure is safe. In most cases, the probabilistic approach of designing a structure gives results that are closer to reality and thus less conservative than a deterministic approach. This could be of interest in structural design since it would allow to design structures differently and save on materials and on money, as well as assessing the reliability of an existing structure and determining how far it is from failure. Moreover, it is an useful tool for assessing the reliability of existing structures since parameters can be adapted with respect to target reliabil- ity or importance of the building.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Chapter 6 Structural Reliability
    MIL-HDBK-17-3E, Working Draft CHAPTER 6 STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY Page 6.1 INTRODUCTION ....................................................................................................................... 2 6.2 FACTORS AFFECTING STRUCTURAL RELIABILITY............................................................. 2 6.2.1 Static strength.................................................................................................................... 2 6.2.2 Environmental effects ........................................................................................................ 3 6.2.3 Fatigue............................................................................................................................... 3 6.2.4 Damage tolerance ............................................................................................................. 4 6.3 RELIABILITY ENGINEERING ................................................................................................... 4 6.4 RELIABILITY DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ............................................................................. 5 6.5 RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT AND DESIGN............................................................................. 6 6.5.1 Background........................................................................................................................ 6 6.5.2 Deterministic vs. Probabilistic Design Approach ............................................................... 7 6.5.3 Probabilistic Design Methodology.....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Analysis of Flood Defence Structures and Systems in Europe
    Reliability analysis of fl ood defence structures and systems in Europe HRPP 380 P. van Gelder, F. Buijs, W. Horst, W. Kanning, C. Mai Van, M. Rajabalinejad, E. de Boer, S. Gupta, R. Shams, N. van Erp, B. Gouldby, G. Kingston, P. Sayers, M. Wills, A. Kortenhaus & H.J. Lambrecht Reproduced from: Flood Risk Management - Research and Practice Proceedings of FLOODrisk 2008 Keble College, Oxford, UK 30 September to 2 October 2008 Flood Risk Management: Research and Practice – Samuels et al. (eds) © 2009 Taylor & Francis Group, London, ISBN 978-0-415-48507-4 Reliability analysis of flood defence structures and systems in Europe Pieter van Gelder, Foekje Buijs, Wouter ter Horst, Wim Kanning, Cong Mai Van, Mohammadreza Rajabalinejad, Elisabet de Boer, Sayan Gupta, Reza Shams & Noel van Erp TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands Ben Gouldby, Greer Kingston, Paul Sayers & Martin Wills HR Wallingford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, UK Andreas Kortenhaus & Hans-Jörg Lambrecht LWI Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany ABSTRACT: In this paper the reliability analysis of flood defence systems and the probabilistic flood risk analysis approach are outlined. The application of probabilistic design methods offers the designer a way to unify the design of engineering structures, processes and management systems. For this reason there is a grow- ing interest in the use of these methods in the design and safety analysis of flood defences and a separate task on this issue in the European FLOODsite project was defined. This paper describes the background of probabilistic analyses, uncertainties , and system analysis and how this has been dealt with under FLOODsite. Eventually, a case study at the German Bight has been used to illustrate the application of the tools and results are discussed here as well.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Design Tools for Vertical Breakwaters
    CHAPTER 5 Probabilistic design tools and applications 5.1 INTRODUCTION In this chapter the probabilistic design tools will be presented. This encompasses the methods to combine the inherent uncertainty of the natural boundary condi- tions, the uncertainty due to lack of information of the natural environment, the quality of the structure and the engineering models into the measure of a failure probability that expresses the reliability of a structural system. Also a decision has to be taken whether the structural reliability is sufficient in view of the eco- nomic and societal functions of the structure. As an aid to this decision a safety philosophy has been formulated. As the application of the probabilistic design method requires considerable ef- fort and resources, a simpler approach using partial safety factors is derived within the probabilistic framework. This chapter aims at designers of vertical breakwaters with an interest in the probabilistic design method and the background of a partial safety factor code. It may also serve as an introduction for researchers who want to familiarise them- selves with the theoretical backgrounds. These readers however, are referred to Volume II for more detailed information. This chapter treats the description of the failure modes of a vertical breakwater including the uncertainties in section 5.2.2 and 5.3.2 and the methods to calculate the probabilities of failure of each failure mode in section 5.2.3. In section 5.2.4 the methods to gain insight in the performance of the structure as a whole are treated. The ways to combine the failure probabilities of the various modes into the reliability of the structure are given in section 5.2.5.
    [Show full text]
  • M E 591X: Probabilistic Engineering Analysis and Design (Spring 2018 Schedule: M W F 10 – 10:50 Am, Black 1026)
    M E 591X: Probabilistic Engineering Analysis and Design (Spring 2018 Schedule: M W F 10 – 10:50 am, Black 1026) This is an experimental graduate-level course on engineering design for reliability and failure prevention. The course will be offered in the Spring 2018 semester. Motivation Since the 1980s, major industries and government agencies worldwide have faced increasing challenges in ensuring the reliability of engineered systems. Examples of failures in attaining high reliability include the Chernobyl disaster in Russia (1986), the collapse of the I-35W Mississippi River Bridge in the U.S. (2007), the lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery fire/smoke issues on Boeing 787 Dreamliners in the U.S. and Japan (2013), and the Li-ion battery exploding/smoke issues on Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (2016). The rapidly increasing costs associated with these failures, along with stringent reliability requirements, have resulted in considerable research attention directed towards developing probabilistic analysis and design methods for anticipating and avoiding catastrophic failures. The existing curriculum at ISU does not adequately address reliability and uncertainty in engineering system design and post-design failure prognostics. There is a need to introduce this knowledge to students so that they can directly apply it to their own research studies where uncertainty and/or reliability may play an important role. This course will meet this need by exploring statistical/probabilistic methods for engineering design and prognostics and health management. It will provide students with a hands-on experience on the applications of these methods to analyze and improve the reliability of engineered systems. Description • Applications of probabilistic and statistical methods to engineering system design and post- design failure prognostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
    Building Technologies & Urban Systems Division Energy Technologies Area Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Simulation-aided occupant-centric building design: A critical review of tools, methods, and applications Elie Azar1, William O’Brien2, Salvatore Carlucci3,4, Tianzhen Hong5, Andrew Sonta6, Joyce Kim7, Maedot S. Andargie8, Tareq Abuimara2, Mounir El Asmar9, Rishee Jain6, Mohamed M. Ouf10, Farhang Tahmasebi11, Jenny Jin Zhou12 1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE 2 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, Canada 3 Energy, Environment and Water Research Center, The Cyprus Institute, Nicosia, Cyprus 4 Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway 5 Building Technology and Urban Systems Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, CA, USA 6 Urban Informatics Lab, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA 7 Department of Architecture, University of California Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, USA 8 Department of Civil and Mineral Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada 9 School of Sustainable Engineering and the Built Environment, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ, USA 10 Department of Building, Civil, and Environmental Engineering, Concordia University, Montreal, QC, Canada 11 Institute for Environmental Design and Engineering, University College London, London, UK 12 Department of Civil Engineering, Monash
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Design
    A111D3 Qfifi^3H NATL INST OF STANDARDS & TECH R.I.C. gineering design : }77 C.1 NBS-PUB-C 19 NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION 487 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE / National Bureau of Standards Engineering Design MFPG 25th Meeting - r»iT--ti>ii-J'fittMni i;f iiff ii i>i<tiiii m NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards^ was established by an act of Congress March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to pro- mote public safety. The Bureau consists of the Institute for Basic Standards, the Institute for Materials Research, the Institute for Applied Technology, the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology, the Office for Information Programs, and the Office of Experimental Technology Incentives Program. THE INSTITUTE FOR BASIC STANDARDS provides the central basis within the United States of a complete and consist- ent system of physical measurement; coordinates that system with measurement systems of other nations; and furnishes essen- tial services leading to accurate and uniform physical measurements throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce. The Institute consists of the Office of Measurement Services, and the following center and divisions: Applied Mathematics — Electricity — Mechanics — Heat — Optical Physics — Center for Radiation Research — Lab- oratory Astrophysics^ — Cryogenics^ — Electromagnetics'' — Time and Frequency".
    [Show full text]
  • Reliability Evaluation and Probabilistic Design of Coastal Structures
    Aalborg Universitet Reliability Evaluation and Probabilistic Design of Coastal Structures Burcharth, H. F. Published in: International Seminar on Hydro-Technical Engineering for Futute Development of Ports and Harbors Publication date: 1993 Document Version Accepted author manuscript, peer reviewed version Link to publication from Aalborg University Citation for published version (APA): Burcharth, H. F. (1993). Reliability Evaluation and Probabilistic Design of Coastal Structures. In International Seminar on Hydro-Technical Engineering for Futute Development of Ports and Harbors Unyusho Kowan Gijutsu Kenkyujo. General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. ? Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. ? You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain ? You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us at [email protected] providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. Downloaded from vbn.aau.dk on: October 10, 2021 International Seminar on Hydro-Technical Engineering for FUture Development of Ports and Harbours ·- Tokyo, 1993 # • RELIABILITY EVALUATION AND PROBABILISTIC DESIGN OF COASTAL STRUCTURES HANS F. BURCHARTH Department of Civil Engineering Aalborg University, Denmark Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 Failure modes and failure functions 2 3 Single failure mode probability analysis 4 3.1 Level Ill methods .
    [Show full text]
  • PROBABILISTIC DESIGN for ROTOR INTEGRITY October 2018 6
    DOT/FAA/TC-18/6 Probabilistic Design for Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center Rotor Integrity Aviation Research Division Atlantic City International Airport New Jersey 08405 October 2018 Final Report This document is available to the U.S. public through the National Technical Information Services (NTIS), Springfield, Virginia 22161. This document is also available from the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center at actlibrary.tc.faa.gov. U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICE This document is disseminated under the sponsorship of the U.S. Department of Transportation in the interest of information exchange. The U.S. Government assumes no liability for the contents or use thereof. The U.S. Government does not endorse products or manufacturers. Trade or manufacturers’ names appear herein solely because they are considered essential to the objective of this report. The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agency. This document does not constitute FAA policy. Consult the FAA sponsoring organization listed on the Technical Documentation page as to its use. This report is available at the Federal Aviation Administration William J. Hughes Technical Center’s Full-Text Technical Reports page: actlibrary.tc.faa.gov in Adobe Acrobat portable document format (PDF). Technical Report Documentation Page 1. Report No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. DOT/FAA/TC-18/6 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date October 2018 PROBABILISTIC DESIGN FOR ROTOR INTEGRITY 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Design - the Future of Rock Engineering
    I.J.M.G.E., University of Tehran, Vol. 46, No. 1, June 2012, PP. 33-42 33 Probabilistic Design - The Future of Rock Engineering Nielen van der Merwe* Professor in the Centennial Chair for Rock Engineering University of the Witwatersrand Johannesburg, South Africa (Received 29 March 2011, Received in Revised form 27 June 2011, Accepted 28 November2011) Abstract A brief background to the development of the rock engineering design process is given, showing that since the development of the science of mathematics, deterministic methods have been used to perform various calculations. The variability of rock properties and support characteristics have always been known. However, they were not explicitly used in design but compensated for by the use of a safety factor, i.e. making a design more stringent than required by the calculations. The problem with this procedure is that the effect of increasing a safety factor on the overall stability of the design cannot be known because the range of variability is not incorporated in the design. The only way to overcome this problem is to make use of the science of probability. In doing that, the ranges of rock qualities are explicitly included in the design and the probability of failure is exposed. Examples of common rock engineering calculations in mining are provided, showing that the probabilistic designs are not difficult or time consuming to perform and yield much more useful outcomes than merely using a safety factor. Keywords: Rock Engineering, Deterministic Design, Reliability, Point Estimate method (PEM) Introduction Rock control has been practised ever It became possible to calculate the weight since the first hole in the ground was made of blocks of rock and then to calculate the by man.
    [Show full text]
  • Distributed Control of Interconnected Systems in the Behavioural Framework
    Distributed Control of Interconnected Systems in the Behavioural Framework by Yitao Yan B.E. (Hons) in Chemical Engineering A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy School of Chemical Engineering The University of New South Wales Sydney, Australia December, 2019 Thesis/Dissertation Sheet Surname/Family Name : Yan Given Name/s : Yitao Abbreviation for degree as give in the University calendar : PhD Faculty : Faculty of Engineering School : School of Chemical Engineering Thesis Title : Distributed Control of Interconnected Systems in the Behavioural Framework Abstract 350 words maximum: (PLEASE TYPE) The rapid development of technology has made the design, monitoring and data storage of large-scale, complex interconnected systems possible. These efficient and economical interconnected systems come with a price: the complex dynamics due to convoluted interconnections makes the effective control of such a system incredibly difficult. The behaviour of the subsystems in a network is vastly different than that when it is not, and the inherent uncertainties due to modelling errors may be amplified as a result of the strong interactions. Furthermore, the ability to collect and process large amount of data leads to the paradigm shift from model-centric description to data-centric description or hybrid model/data description of a system. These challenges necessitate the need for a unified foundation for the control of complex systems that is able to admit descriptions of systems other than the conventional differential/difference models. Motivated by these challenges, this thesis aims to develop such a framework for the distributed control of an interconnected system using the behavioural systems theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessment of Regional Earthquake Hazards and Risk Along the Wasatch Front, Utah FRONT COVER
    U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Assessment of Regional Earthquake Hazards and Risk Along the Wasatch Front, Utah FRONT COVER. View to the southeast of downtown Salt Lake City, Utah, circa 1980. Wasatch Range with prominent Lake Bonneville shorelines in the background. Assessment of Regional Earthquake Hazards and Risk Along the Wasatch Front, Utah PAULA L. GORI and WALTER W. HAYS, Editors U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 1500-K-R Contributions from Utah Geological Survey, University of Utah, and Utah State University Chapters K R are issued as a single volume and are not available separately. Chapter titles are listed in the volume table of contents. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR BRUCE BABBITT, Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Charles G. Groat, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Author affiliations given in this volume were correct at the time the report was approved for publication. Published in the Eastern Region, Reston, Va. Manuscript approved for publication October 5,1995. Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data Assessing regional earthquake hazards and risk along the Wasatch Front, Utah / edited by Paula L. Gori and Walter W. Hays. p. cm. (U.S. Geological Survey professional paper : 1500K-R) Includes bibliographical references. Supt.ofDocs.no.: 119.16: 1500KZ. 1. Earthquakes Wasatch Range (Utah and Idaho) 2. Earthquakes Utah. I. Gori, Paula. II. Hays, Walter W. III. Series: U.S. Geological Survey professional paper; 1500. QE535.2.U6A84 2000 551.2'2'097922 dc20 92-33618 CIP For sale by U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Probabilistic Design and Uncertainty Quantification of the Structure of A
    Probabilistic design and uncertainty quantification of the structure of a monopile offshore wind turbine Abraham Nispel, Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, João Paulo Dias, Americo Cunha Jr To cite this version: Abraham Nispel, Stephen Ekwaro-Osire, João Paulo Dias, Americo Cunha Jr. Probabilistic design and uncertainty quantification of the structure of a monopile offshore wind turbine. ASME2019 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition (IMECE2019), Nov 2019, Salt Lake City, United States. hal-02388512 HAL Id: hal-02388512 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02388512 Submitted on 2 Dec 2019 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Copyright Proceedings of the ASME 2019 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition IMECE2019 November 11-14, 2019, Salt Lake City, UT, USA IMECE2019-11862 PROBABILISTIC DESIGN AND UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF THE STRUCTURE OF A MONOPILE OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE Abraham Nispel, Stephen Ekwaro-Osire1, João Paulo Dias Americo Cunha Jr. Department of Mechanical Engineering Institute of Mathematics and Statistics Texas Tech University Rio de Janeiro State University Lubbock, TX, USA Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Despite the increasing demand for offshore energy, Renewable energies have arisen as a solid alternative to structural components of offshore wind turbines (OWT), such as satisfy the growing demand for energy around the globe.
    [Show full text]