Research Assessment and Maintenance of Dental Implants: Clinical and Knowledge– Seeking Practices of Dental Hygienists

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Assessment and Maintenance of Dental Implants: Clinical and Knowledge– Seeking Practices of Dental Hygienists Research Assessment and Maintenance of Dental Implants: Clinical and Knowledge– Seeking Practices of Dental Hygienists Sue Tucker Ward, RDH, MEd; Charlene A. Czuszak, DDS, MS; Ana Luz Thompson, RDH, MHE; Mary C. Downey, RDH, MS; Marie A. Collins, RDH, MS, EdD Introduction Abstract Dental implants have become the Purpose: This study surveyed dental hygienists in order to treatment of choice for replacing assess their routine approach for dental implant maintenance missing teeth, and the frequency and to determine if a relationship exists between the formal of placement has rapidly increased education of dental hygienists and their previous attendance since the mid–1960s.1 Varying re- and interest in future implant related continuing education sults have been reported in studies courses. related to assessing dental implants, identifying signs of failure, planning Methods A survey was distributed to dental hygienists at- continued care, implementing treat- tending an annual national continuing education course. Par- ment and evaluating outcomes.2–5 ticipants voluntarily completed and submitted their survey Researchers have expounded on before the end of the first day of the 3 day course. various protocols for the assessment Results: The results indicate that there is a statistically sig- of dental implants, which include nificant relationship between the level of formal education obtaining radiographs and assessing and implant related continuing education course attendance. periodontal health (probing depths, Dental hygienists whose formal education did not include mobility, bleeding on probing and dental implant care were more likely to attend implant re- inflammation).6,7 After systematic lated continuing education courses than those whose formal reviews of randomized controlled education included this content. The majority of the dental trials, Faggion et al developed an hygienists expressed interest in continuing education courses evidence–based algorithm for the on dental implants. Results of chi–square analysis show a treatment of peri–implantitis.4 statistically significant relationship between the type of edu- cation and interest in attending implant related continuing It is widely known that bleeding education courses. There was no statistically significant dif- on probing is an indicator of inflam- ference in continuing education interest between dental hy- mation of soft tissue whether around gienists whose formal education did or did not include dental natural teeth or implants. However, implants. there is controversy regarding the Conclusion: Additional continuing education courses have frequency of probing around den- been completed by most dental hygienists whose curricula tal implants due to risk of damag- did not include formal training on dental implant care. Most 5 ing delicate peri–implant tissues. dental hygienists are interested in gaining additional knowl- Another concern is introducing bac- edge whether or not their dental hygiene curriculum con- teria into peri–implant tissues from tained content on dental implants. surrounding teeth for which Terra- ciano suggests avoiding cross con- Keywords: Dental implants, dental hygienists, oral examina- tamination by probing and scaling tion, instrumentation, dental continuing education dental implants first.2 Overall, re- This study supports the NDHRA priority area, Clinical Dental searchers agree that gentle probing Hygiene: Assess the use of evidence–based treatment rec- is an important part of the implant ommendations in dental hygiene practice. recall.2,5,7,8 The use of plastic probes is recommended to provide more flexibility when positioning it parallel produce less damage to the implant surface and to to the long axis of the abutment.2,9 For the most 104 The Journal of Dental Hygiene Vol. 86 • No. 2 • Spring 2012 gentle probing around dental implants, a plastic scores improved in both groups, with no effects controlled–force probe is recommended.10 on probing depths15 • Resin tipped scalers versus gold coated or Heitz–Mayfield described best practices for de- graphite instruments: resin tipped scalers do tecting implant failure using mobility tests and ra- not create scratches and performed better than diographic findings.11 Radiographs are deemed an gold coated/graphite instruments16 integral component of implant maintenance and • Plastic scalers versus ultrasonic device: plastic the most important assessment tool for evaluat- scalers produced less alteration of titanium sur- ing implant status.6,12 The literature varies as to faces than ultrasonic device17 the recommended interval for taking radiographs. • Curettes versus ultrasonic device: no group dif- Recommended maintenance protocols distinguish ferences in the ability to reduce the microbiota necessary care during and after the first year of in peri–implantitis3 implant placement. A few of the various protocols • Ultrasonic scalers covered with a plastic sheath suggested are: and Ultrasonic scalers with carbon tips versus metal scalers: carbon and plastic tipped ultra- • Initial placement: 6 months, 12 months and sonics produced smooth implant surfaces while every 2 years12,13 metal tips resulted in damaged implant surfac- • Initial placement: 1, 3 and 5 years if no pathol- es18 ogy present5 • Initial placement: 6 and 12 months, annually Dental hygienists are routinely responsible for if no pathology present – if pathology present, the continuity of patient education and maintenance every 6 months until resolution14 of dental implants, years beyond initial placement. This care is referred to as the “first line” therapy Panoramic radiographs are most valuable when or the nonsurgical approach.4 However, there is a determining potential implant candidates.2 Radio- paucity of evidence based research regarding the graphs can be used to determine bone loss over best practices for implant maintenance, specifically time, to identify areas of radiolucency that could by the dental hygienist. Graduates prior to the late indicate implant failure, and to confirm adequate 1990s may have had little to no formal education seating of the abutment or prosthesis.2,5,8,9,11,12 Pe- on implant care, yet they are treating patients with riapical radiographs using the paralleling technique dental implants. Dentists are encouraged to active- have been recommended to assess bone loss and ly seek standardized and comprehensive training implant components.5 When evaluating dental im- via professional–centered education.4 Professional plants after placement, panoramic radiographs continuing education may similarly fulfill this need are considered helpful tools by some while others for dental hygienists. question their value.5,13 In this current study, authors surveyed dental The dental hygiene appointment may include de- hygienists from diverse educational and practice bridement of hard and soft deposits using hand and backgrounds in order to assess their routine ap- power instruments designed specifically to protect proach for dental implant maintenance. This study the delicate implant surface. Recare intervals of 3, also sought to determine if a relationship exists 4 or 6 months are recommended for careful evalu- between the formal education of dental hygienists ation of peri–implant tissues by the dental hygien- and their previous attendance and interest in fu- ist and dentist.8 ture continuing education courses about implants. Persson pointed out that it is likely that the in- Methods and Materials struments available for debridement around im- After an extensive review of the literature, fac- plants are not properly designed to reach affected ulty at the Medical College of Georgia Department areas.3 This limitation is mentioned because im- of Dental Hygiene developed a 24–item paper plant design, location and clinical conditions make survey specifically for this study. All items on the it difficult to provide adequate debridement of survey reflected content found in publications that dental implants. While searching for ideal implant addressed maintenance of dental implants. Only tools, researchers have studied the effect of sev- the faculty considered the questions and content eral debridement instruments on implant surfaces. validity of the survey. The protocol for this study Summaries of their findings include: was submitted to the institution’s Human Assur- ance Committee. Upon review of the proposal, it • Titanium hand instruments versus ultrasonic was determined that this study was not considered scalers: no group differences were found in human subjects research as defined by the federal the treatment outcomes. Plaque and bleeding regulations because the data obtained was restrict- Vol. 86 • No. 2 • Spring 2012 The Journal of Dental Hygiene 105 ed to assessing the practices of dental hygienists. Table I: States Where Participants Practice Dental Hygiene Upon arrival to an annual national continuing education course, the instrument Dental Hygiene State Number % Care of Implants–Survey of Dental Hygienists was GA 277 75 distributed to all attendees (n=370). All course SC 43 12 attendees were female and the states they rep- NC 19 5.1 resented are shown in Table I. Participants were conveniently sampled and volunteered to submit FL 17 4.6 their survey before the end of the first day of the VA 2 0.5 3 day course. Surveys submitted after the first day KY 2 0.5 of the symposium were not included in this study because lectures on implant maintenance were MD 1 0.3 scheduled for the second day. Completed surveys NJ 1
Recommended publications
  • Long-Term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: a Case Report
    Long-term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: A Case Report Abstract Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is a rare condition characterized by varying degrees of gingival hyperplasia. Gingival fibromatosis usually occurs as an isolated disorder or can be associated with a variety of other syndromes. A 33-year-old male patient who had a generalized severe gingival overgrowth covering two thirds of almost all maxillary and mandibular teeth is reported. A mucoperiosteal flap was performed using interdental and crevicular incisions to remove excess gingival tissues and an internal bevel incision to reflect flaps. The patient was treated 15 years ago in the same clinical facility using the same treatment strategy. There was no recurrence one year following the most recent surgery. Keywords: Gingival hyperplasia, hereditary gingival hyperplasia, HGF, hereditary disease, therapy, mucoperiostal flap Citation: S¸engün D, Hatipog˘lu H, Hatipog˘lu MG. Long-term Uncontrolled Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: A Case Report. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007 January;(8)1:090-096. © Seer Publishing 1 The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, Volume 8, No. 1, January 1, 2007 Introduction Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF), also Ankara, Turkey with a complaint of recurrent known as elephantiasis gingiva, hereditary generalized gingival overgrowth. The patient gingival hyperplasia, idiopathic fibromatosis, had presented himself for examination at the and hypertrophied gingival, is a rare condition same clinic with the same complaint 15 years (1:750000)1 which can present as an isolated ago. At that time, he was treated with full-mouth disorder or more rarely as a syndrome periodontal surgery after the diagnosis of HGF component.2,3 This condition is characterized by had been made following clinical and histological a slow and progressive enlargement of both the examination (Figures 1 A-B).
    [Show full text]
  • Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis CASE REPORT
    Richa et al.: Management of Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis CASE REPORT Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis and its management: A Rare Case of Homozygous Twins Richa1, Neeraj Kumar2, Krishan Gauba3, Debojyoti Chatterjee4 1-Tutor, Unit of Pedodontics and preventive dentistry, ESIC Dental College and Hospital, Rohini, Delhi. 2-Senior Resident, Unit of Pedodontics and preventive dentistry, Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Correspondence to: Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research , Chandigarh, India. 3-Professor and Head, Dr. Richa, Tutor, Unit of Pedodontics and Department of Oral Health Sciences Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and preventive dentistry, ESIC Dental College and Research, Chandigarh, India. 4-Senior Resident, Department of Histopathology, Oral Health Sciences Hospital, Rohini, Delhi Centre, Post Graduate Institute of Medical Education and Research, Chandigarh, India. Contact Us: www.ijohmr.com ABSTRACT Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is a rare condition which manifests itself by gingival overgrowth covering teeth to variable degree i.e. either isolated or as part of a syndrome. This paper presented two cases of generalized and severe HGF in siblings without any systemic illness. HGF was confirmed based on family history, clinical and histological examination. Management of both the cases was done conservatively. Quadrant wise gingivectomy using ledge and wedge method was adopted and followed for 12 months. The surgical procedure yielded functionally and esthetically satisfying results with no recurrence. KEYWORDS: Gingival enlargement, Hereditary, homozygous, Gingivectomy AA swollen gums. The patient gave a history of swelling of upper gums that started 2 years back which gradually aaaasasasss INTRODUCTION increased in size. The child’s mother denied prenatal Hereditary Gingival Enlargement, being a rare entity, is exposure to tobacco, alcohol, and drug.
    [Show full text]
  • Diagnosis Questions and Answers
    1.0 DIAGNOSIS – 6 QUESTIONS 1. Where is the narrowest band of attached gingiva found? 1. Lingual surfaces of maxillary incisors and facial surfaces of maxillary first molars 2. Facial surfaces of mandibular second premolars and lingual of canines 3. Facial surfaces of mandibular canines and first premolars and lingual of mandibular incisors* 4. None of the above 2. All these types of tissue have keratinized epithelium EXCEPT 1. Hard palate 2. Gingival col* 3. Attached gingiva 4. Free gingiva 16. Which group of principal fibers of the periodontal ligament run perpendicular from the alveolar bone to the cementum and resist lateral forces? 1. Alveolar crest 2. Horizontal crest* 3. Oblique 4. Apical 5. Interradicular 33. The width of attached gingiva varies considerably with the greatest amount being present in the maxillary incisor region; the least amount is in the mandibular premolar region. 1. Both statements are TRUE* 39. The alveolar process forms and supports the sockets of the teeth and consists of two parts, the alveolar bone proper and the supporting alveolar bone; ostectomy is defined as removal of the alveolar bone proper. 1. Both statements are TRUE* 40. Which structure is the inner layer of cells of the junctional epithelium and attaches the gingiva to the tooth? 1. Mucogingival junction 2. Free gingival groove 3. Epithelial attachment * 4. Tonofilaments 1 49. All of the following are part of the marginal (free) gingiva EXCEPT: 1. Gingival margin 2. Free gingival groove 3. Mucogingival junction* 4. Interproximal gingiva 53. The collar-like band of stratified squamous epithelium 10-20 cells thick coronally and 2-3 cells thick apically, and .25 to 1.35 mm long is the: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Lab Users Guide
    Reference Lab Users Guide North Memorial Health Laboratory Services Philosophy Our laboratory values mutual respect, teamwork, positive attitudes, accountability, and open effective communication encouraging compassionate, remarkable care. Laboratory Accreditation The North Memorial Laboratory Services User’s Guide is a resource for facilities that use theLa Laboratoryborato Servicesry A ofc cNorthred Memorial.itatio Inn this guide you will find information you need. The User’s Guide is updated on a continuous basis. Our laboratory is CLIA certified through theThe accreditation North Memorial process Laboratory of the Services College User’s of American Guide is aPathologists resource for facilities (CAP) and that theuse theAmerican AssociationLaboratory Services of Blood of Banks North Memorial.(AABB): In this guide you will find information you need. The User’s Guide is updated on a continuous basis. Our laboratory is CLIA certified through the accreditation process of the College of American Pathologists (CAP) and the American Association of Blood Banks (AABB): College of American Pathologists AABB CAP #:18040-01 AABB #: 006331 CLIA ID #: 24D0402379 *CLIA certification obtained through CAP and AABB accreditation 1 Table of contents North Memorial Health Accreditation . 1 Lab location and phone numbers . 3 Critical Values. .8-9 Specimen Guide Order of Draw. 10 Lab Test Change (January, 2017) . .11 Laboratory Collection Procedures . 12 Microbiology Procedures . 13-37 Urinalysis Collection & Transport . 38-42 Cytology. 43-52 Histology
    [Show full text]
  • The-Anatomy-Of-The-Gum-1.Pdf
    OpenStax-CNX module: m66361 1 The Anatomy of the Gum* Marcos Gridi-Papp This work is produced by OpenStax-CNX and licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 Abstract The gingiva is the part of the masticatory mucosa that surrounds the teeth and extends to the alveolar mucosa. It is rmly attached to the jaw bone and it has keratinized stratied squamous epithelium. The free gingiva is separated from the tooth by the gingival groove and it it very narrow. Most of the gum is the attached gingiva. The interdental gingiva occupies the cervical embrasures in healthy gums but periodontal disease may cause it to receede. Gingival bers attach the gums to the neck of the tooth. They also provide structure to the gingiva and connect the free to the attached gingivae. Figure 1: Maxillary gingiva of a dog. More details1. This chapter is about the gums, which are also called gingivae (singular gingiva). The text will describe the structure of the gingiva and explain its role in periodontal diseases, from gingivitis to abscesses in humans and other mammals. *Version 1.1: Mar 3, 2018 8:43 pm -0600 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 1https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3b/Bull_Terrier_Chico_05.jpg http://cnx.org/content/m66361/1.1/ OpenStax-CNX module: m66361 2 1 Structure The gingiva is part of the masticatory mucosa2 of the mouth. This mucosa is formed by keratinized stratied squamous epithelium and it covers the dorsum of the tongue and hard palate in addition to forming the gingivae. Figure 2: The gingiva surrounds the teeth and contacts the alveolar mucosa.
    [Show full text]
  • Prevalence of Gingival Stippling in Teenagers
    IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861.Volume 14, Issue 9 Ver. VI (Sep. 2015), PP 94-97 www.iosrjournals.org Prevalence of Gingival Stippling in Teenagers Dler A. Khursheed1, Ranjdar M. Talabani2,Didar S. Hamagharib2, Shoxan A. Karim1, Shamal S. Zorab1,Hawzhen M. Mohammed Saeed2, Shoxan A. Hussein3 1(Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry/ University of Sulaimani, Iraq) 2(Department of Conservative Dentistry, School of Dentistry/ University of Sulaimani, Iraq) 3(Department of Oral Diagnosis, School of Dentistry/ University of Sulaimani, Iraq) Abstract: The texture of the gingival surface may be similar to orange peel and is referred to gingival stippling. It is caused by intersection of epithelial rete ridges that causes the depression and the interspersing of connective tissue papillae between these intersections giving rise to the small bumps. Objective:The aim of the study was to determine the prevalence of gingival stippling in teenagers. Results:Among hundred and sixty-eight teenagers, 63 was male and 105 female. 86.9% of the teenagers showed gingival stippling;88.9% of the male and 85.7% of the female. The percentages of presence of gingival stippling in upper and lower jaws of male and female were 88.9%, 44.4% and 85.7%, 59.9% respectively. Conclusion:Female showed higher percentage of gingival stippling than males, and stippling was higher in upper jaw than lower jaw. Key words:Gingiva, Gingival stippling, Teenagers, I. Introduction Gingival stippling is a characteristic of the healthy attached gingiva and its diminution or loss has been considered as a sign of gingival disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Dental Article
    Dental Article One of the biggest challenges for animal dental care is ® keeping the gingival sulcus clean. Dental problems are often caused by plaque at the gingival sulcus and lead ® to irreversible periodontal disease. Therefore, veterinary dental cleaning is essential for dogs and cats. However, plaque starts to reattach to the teeth within hours after a dental cleaning if no take home dental care is administered afterwards. Unfortunately, client/owner compliance for take home dental care is approximately 1%. This is where SANOS® veterinary dental barrier sealant can help. SANOS® is SANOS® was designed for pet owners who designed to extend the life of a dental cleaning when are not able to brush their pet’s teeth applied immediately following a professional dental prophylaxis. A single application of SANOS® helps keep the SANOS® can best be described as a self-hardening gumline free of plaque for up to six months liquid bandage device that helps and aids in gingival and oral health. Importantly, no take home follow-up application is required by the client and one application Applied by veterinary professionals at spay/neuter, lasts up to 6 months. wellness checkups and after a dental cleaning The SANOS® application is put in the hands of the professional to make sure the patient receives the Start applications at 6 months of age as an application correctly and in a timely fashion.* important component of an overall Wellness *Taken from: Program SANOS® AS PART OF YOUR DENTAL PROPHYLAXIS by Peter Emily, DDS, Hon. AVDC. Product Information Formulated specifically for the dental (1) dental workstation challenges of dogs and cats (4) applicator brushes (1) 1/16 oz.
    [Show full text]
  • PARTIAL DENTURE TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES for the Processing of Partial Denture Alloys and Investment Materials
    www.bego.com PARTIAL DENTURE TECHNIQUE GUIDELINES for the processing of partial denture alloys and investment materials Partners in Progress CONTENTS Jörg Fasel, Product Manager Materials BEGO Contents Introduction – The BEGO partial denture technique 3 Planning and design 4–7 Duplicating 8–10 Production of investment model 11 Wax-ups 12–15 Investment 16 Varseo partial denture production CAD/CAM 17–20 Preheating 21 Melting and casting 22–24 Deflasking, sandblasting and finishing 25–26 Shining, fitting and polishing 27 Jointing technology 28–30 Specialist literature for partial prosthetics 31 Preventive error management 32–37 INTRODUCTION – THE BEGO PARTIAL DENTURE TECHNIQUE A system for success The aim of the cooperation between dentists and dental The partial denture technique based on the BEGO system has technicians is to provide patients with high quality dentures been offering materials, devices and expertise to satisfy the strict offering them a decidedly better quality of life. requirements for more than 60 years now. Coordinated process steps, materials tried and tested over a long The restoration of lost masticatory function and natural- period of time and practical, modern equipment of the device – looking aesthetics are the fundamental goals of each and every combined with the dental technician’s prowess – have a decisive prosthetic restoration. From the patient’s perspective, these are effect on the results. requirements which go without saying. Against this backdrop, removable dentures tend to be seen less These guidelines on the partial denture technique based on the favourably in many dental practices and dental laboratories BEGO system illustrate clearly the background to the systematic nowadays.
    [Show full text]
  • Oral Histology Lec.1 Lab.1 Preparation of Histological Specimens
    Oral Histology Lec.1 Lab.1 Dr.Munir Nasr Preparation of histological specimens Histology (compound of the Greek words: histo “tissue”, and logy “science”) is the study of the microscopic anatomy of cells and tissues of plants and animals. It is commonly performed by examining cells and tissues by sectioning and staining, followed by examination under a light or electron microscopes. Histological studies may be conducted via tissue culture, where live cells can be isolated and maintained in a proper environment outside the body for various research projects. The ability to visualize or differentially identify microscopic structures is frequently enhanced through the use of histological stains. The steps of sample preparations: 1. Tissue fixation 2.Tissue processing 3. Tissue cutting or sectioning 4. Tissue staining Tissue fixation Fixation is a complex series of chemical events that differ for the different groups of substance found in tissues. The aim of fixation: 1- To prevent autolysis and bacterial attack. 2- To fix the tissues so they will not change their volume and shape during processing. 3 - To prepare tissue and leave it in a condition which allow clear staining of sections. 1 4 . To leave tissue as close as their living state as possible, and no small molecules should be lost. Fixation is coming by reaction between the fixative and protein which form a gel, so keeping everything as their in vivo relation to each other. Factors affect fixation: -PH. -Temperature. -Penetration of fixative. -Volume of tissue. According to previous factors we can determine the concentration of fixative and fixation time. Types of fixative: Acetic acid, Formaldehyde, Ethanol, Glutaraldehyde, Methanol and Picric acid.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodontium © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT for SALE OR Distributionin Healthnot for SALE OR DISTRIBUTION
    © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © JonesPart & Bartlett Learning,1 LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION The Periodontium © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTIONin HealthNOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning LLC, an Ascend Learning Company. NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION. 9781284209273_CH01_001_022.indd 1 28/02/20 7:13 PM © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC © Jones & Bartlett Learning, LLC NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION NOT FOR SALE OR DISTRIBUTION © Jones & Bartlett Learning,
    [Show full text]
  • Striped-Y Redux: Redesigning Pictographic Notational Systems for the Digital Age Alexander C
    Dental, Oral and Craniofacial Research Research Article ISSN: 2058-5314 Striped-Y redux: Redesigning pictographic notational systems for the digital age Alexander C. Allori* Assistant Professor of Surgery, Duke Cleft & Craniofacial Center, Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Duke Children’s Hospital & Health Center, Durham, NC, USA Abstract Background: Before the advent of electronic medical records, pictographic notational tools were commonly used to succinctly describe clinical phenotypes in paper charts. Over the past 30 years, these methods have been largely abandoned in favor of alphanumerical notational systems, which are more conducive to data entry in clinical and administrative databases. However, such coding systems are incredibly complex, not easily readable or interpretable, and are often limited in their ability to capture phenotypic variation. The purpose of this study was to re-assess the value of pictographic notation for one specific use case — cleft lip/palate (CL/P) — and to propose a novel adaptation of this analog tool for digital data entry. Methods: An expert focus group was convened and consisted of multidisciplinary clinicians and academicians from several well-known cleft teams. Semi-structured interviews were used to explore familiarity with pictographic notational systems for CL/P, such as Kernahan’s “striped-Y” diagram, and to identify how a digital equivalent of these pictograms might best augment modern electronic medical recordkeeping. Results: Pictographic notational systems found to be used clinically in very few centers, but they retained a role in teaching and facilitating communication. There was considerable variation in accuracy and quality of completion of the pictograms, either due to lack of familiarity with the diagram or rushed completion of the diagram.
    [Show full text]
  • Hereditary Gingival Fibromatosis: Characteristics and Treatment Approach
    J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(4):e599-602. Hereditary gingival fibromatosis Journal section: Periodontology doi:10.4317/jced.53644 Publication Types: Case Report http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/jced.53644 Hereditary gingival fibromatosis: Characteristics and treatment approach Pedro J. Almiñana-Pastor 1, Pedro J. Buitrago-Vera 2, Francisco M. Alpiste-Illueca 3, Montserrat Catalá-Piza- rro 4 1 DD, Post-graduated in Periodontics, Department d´Estomatologia, Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain 2 MD DD, PhD in Medicine. Adjunct Professor of Periodontics, Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain 3 MD DD, PhD in Medicine. Assistant Professor of Periodontics, Department d´Estomatologia, Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain 4 MD DD, PhD in Medicine. Associate Professor of Pediatric Dentistry, Department d´Estomatologia, Facultad de Medicina y Odontologia, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain Correspondence: Stomatology Department University of Valencia C/Gascó Oliag 1, 46010 Valencia, Spain Almiñana-Pastor PJ, Buitrago-Vera PJ, Alpiste-Illueca FM, Catalá-Piza- [email protected] rro M. Hereditary gingival fifibromatosis: bromatosis: Characteristics and treatment ap-ap- proach. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(4):e599-602. http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/volumenes/v9i4/jcedv9i4p599.pdf Received: 04/12/2016 Article Number: 53644 http://www.medicinaoral.com/odo/indice.htm Accepted: 07/01/2017 © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F. B 96689336 - eISSN: 1989-5488 eMail: [email protected] Indexed in: Pubmed Pubmed Central® (PMC) Scopus DOI® System Abstract Hereditary gingival fibromatosis (HGF) is a rare disorder characterized by a benign, non-hemorrhagic, fibrous gingival overgrowth that can appear in isolation or as part of a syndrome.
    [Show full text]