University of Copenhagen, Karen Blixens Plads 8, DK- 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark, E-Mail: [email protected]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Big-Men and Small Chiefs The Creation of Bronze Age Societies Iversen, Rune Published in: Open Archaeology DOI: 10.1515/opar-2017-0023 Publication date: 2017 Document version Publisher's PDF, also known as Version of record Citation for published version (APA): Iversen, R. (2017). Big-Men and Small Chiefs: The Creation of Bronze Age Societies. Open Archaeology, 3, 361-375. https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0023 Download date: 27. Sep. 2021 Open Archaeology 2017; 3: 361–375 Original Study Rune Iversen* Big-Men and Small Chiefs: The Creation of Bronze Age Societies https://doi.org/10.1515/opar-2017-0023 Received April 28, 2017; accepted October 7, 2017 Abstract: This paper investigates to what extent the significant material changes observable at the end of the Neolithic reflect transformations of the underlying social dynamics. Answering this question will help us to understand the formation of Bronze Age societies. The analysis concerns southern Scandinavia with a certain focus on Denmark. The assumption is that the creation of Bronze Age societies must be understood as a long formative process that partly originated in the culturally-heterogeneous Middle Neolithic. Four aspects seem to have been essential to this process: the rise of the warrior figure, the reintroduction of metal, increased agricultural production, and the establishment of one of the characteristic features of the Bronze Age, the chieftain hall. These aspects do not appear simultaneously but are introduced step- by-step starting out in the late Middle Neolithic and early Late Neolithic to fully develop around 2000 BC. Consequently, this paper argues that the final Late Neolithic (LN II, c. 1950–1700 BC) was de facto part of the Earliest Bronze Age. Keywords: Late Neolithic, Bronze Age, social transformation, Denmark, warrior, metal, agriculture, halls, Middle Neolithic. 1 Introduction The Neolithic societies of southern Scandinavia were clearly demarcated from those of the Mesolithic by labour-intensive, large-scale construction works such as monumental tombs and enclosures. However, we do not yet see the long-distance, monopolized exchange of metal and prestige items that characterizes the Nordic Bronze Age societies from Period IB and onwards (i.e. from c. 1600 BC) and indicate developed social structures and exchange networks beyond those of the Neolithic. The transition from Neolithic to Bronze Age societies in northern Europe is a theme that has occupied scholars through the years (see e.g. Earle & Kristiansen, 2010; Furholt, Grossmann, & Szmyt, 2016; Iversen, 2015; Kristiansen, 2015; Kristiansen & Earle, 2015; Kristiansen & Larsson, 2005; Prescott, 2009; Prescott & Glørstad, 2011; Vandkilde, 1996). This paper starts from the position that in order to understand the emergence of Bronze Age societies we will have to incorporate a long-term perspective reaching well into the 3rd millennium BC when pan-European phenomena such as the Corded Ware and Bell Beaker complexes changed Neolithic life and prepared the way for the appearance of Bronze Age societies. No doubt, Bronze Age societies were different from those of the Neolithic, but when exactly did this transition take place and how do we explain the wide-ranging social transformations? Using Denmark as a case study, I focus on four aspects that seem to have been essential to this process: the accentuation of the warrior figure, the reintroduction of metal, an increased agricultural focus, and the construction of very large houses or halls. *Corresponding author: Rune Iversen, Saxo Institute, Dept. of Archaeology, University of Copenhagen, Karen Blixens Plads 8, DK- 2300 Copenhagen S, Denmark, E-mail: [email protected] Open Access. © 2017 Rune Iversen, published by De Gruyter Open. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivsBrought to you by | The Royal 4.0 License. Library (Det Kongelige Bibliotek) - National Library of Denmark / Copenhagen University Library Authenticated Download Date | 12/11/17 11:19 AM 362 R. Iversen 2 Neolithic Background According to the traditional Danish and wider South Scandinavian chronology, the Neolithic constitutes three overall phases: Early Neolithic, Middle Neolithic and Late Neolithic (figure 1). Whereas the Early Neolithic can be described as rather homogeneous in cultural terms, only occupied by the Funnel Beaker culture (FBC), it was in social-terms a rather complex period. It was a highly progressive, productive, and ritually-rich period, which first and foremost framed the introduction of agriculture, animal domestication, and the emergence of Neolithic life. This included a wide range of monuments, varied and elaborate deposition practices, the development of complex pottery styles, expanding settlement patterns, and woodland clearances. Early Neolithic (FBC) 4000-3300 BC Early Neolithic I 4000-3500 BC Early Neolithic II 3500-3300 BC Middle Neolithic (FBC, PWC, SGC) 3300-2350 BC Early Middle Neolithic 3300-2850 BC Late Middle Neolithic 2850-2350 BC Late Neolithic (BBC, LNC) 2350-1700 BC Late Neolithic I 2350-1950 BC Late Neolithic II 1950-1700 BC Early Bronze Age 1700-1100 BC Period IA 1700-1600 BC Period IB 1600-1500 BC Period II 1500-1300 BC Period III 1300-1100 BC Figure 1. General Neolithic and Early Bronze Age chronology of southern Scandinavia. Abbreviations: FBC: Funnel Beaker culture, PWC: Pitted Ware culture, SGC: Single Grave culture, BBC: Bell Beaker culture, LNC: Late Neolithic culture. Dates given in calendar years BC. Among the significant Early Neolithic characteristics is an early copper horizon, which started in the final Mesolithic with a few imported single finds dated from c. 4500–3700 BC, and flourished in the later Early Neolithic (EN II, c. 3500–3300 BC), making south Scandinavia comparatively richer in metal than central Europe in this phase. The paramount focus was on heavy copper flat axes, which represent a significant amount of copper imported to South Scandinavia together with metal forging technologies in the later phase (Klassen, 2000). For this reasons, and because of the use of early dolmens constructed for single interments, some scholars have suggested the existence of more or less ranked societies in the late Early Neolithic (Klassen, 2000: 286–292; Kristiansen, 1982: 257–258; Randsborg, 1975, 1979). With the beginning of the Middle Neolithic, the importing of metal ceased and we see the construction of passage graves, which indicate a more communal burial practice that included the mixed remains of men, women, and children. The early 3rd millennium BC was characterized by an increasing culturally diversity. From the very beginning of the millennium, we see the occurrence of the marine-focused and coastal Pitted Ware culture existing alongside the Single Grave culture (Corded Ware culture) of central and western Jutland. At the same time late Funnel Beaker societies lingered on in eastern parts of Denmark (Iversen, 2015). Then, in the last third of the 3rd millennium BC metal was reintroduced to southern Scandinavia, though in small amounts but now including a new peculiar metal – gold. Together with the pressure-flaking flint Brought to you by | The Royal Library (Det Kongelige Bibliotek) - National Library of Denmark / Copenhagen University Library Authenticated Download Date | 12/11/17 11:19 AM Big-Men and Small Chiefs: The Creation of Bronze Age Societies 363 knapping technique and the widespread production of flint daggers made by use of this technique (figure 2), the reappearance of metal defines the Late Neolithic. Despite of clear regional differences (Lomborg, 1973: 96–97, 130–133), the Late Neolithic does not show clear cultural groupings except of late Bell Beaker influences in the early phase (LN I, c. 2350–1950 BC), mainly in northern Jutland (e.g. Sarauw, 2007, 2008, 2009; Vandkilde, 2001, 2007b). Figure 2. Flint dagger from Thy, northern Jutland. Photo: Roberto Fortuna and Kira Ursem, The National Museum of Denmark, licence CC BY-SA. 3 Material Changes in the Later Neolithic In order to address the main question of this paper, we should not just focus on the Late Neolithic but also include developments taking place within the preceding Middle Neolithic. By including the late Middle Neolithic (c. 2850–2350 BC) we might be able to identify elements of social change that can explain the changes visible in the Late Neolithic and Early Bronze Age. This approach should help us understand the formation of Bronze Age societies, not as an event centred around the early 2nd millennium BC, but as a result of deep socio-structural transformations some of which were rooted in culturally-heterogeneous Middle Neolithic societies. In order to identify these social changes in the archaeological record I will address the following four essential aspects that all point to the alteration of social dynamics: 3.1 The Rise of the Warrior At the beginning of the 3rd millennium BC we see significant changes in the archaeological record. Around 2850 BC early Single Grave (Corded Ware) communities spread throughout the central and western parts of the Jutland Peninsula introducing a new burial practice, new beaker forms, new dress ornaments, and new Brought to you by | The Royal Library (Det Kongelige Bibliotek) - National Library of Denmark / Copenhagen University Library Authenticated Download Date | 12/11/17 11:19 AM 364 R. Iversen types of stone battle axes. Battle axes are well known from the previous Funnel Beaker culture. In the Early Neolithic they came in the form of polygonal battle axes clearly resembling contemporary central European copper axes. At the transition to the early Middle Neolithic (c. 3300–2850 BC) double-edged battle axes took over (Zápotocký, 1992). However, the number of Middle Neolithic battle axes was limited, less than 500 have been recorded from Denmark deriving from different contexts including megalithic tombs, wetlands, settlements, and stray finds (Ebbesen, 1975: 174, 206–207, fig. 161). With the emergence of the Single Grave culture we see a significant increase in the number of battle axes of several hundred percent.