GENETIC SIGNATURES of the RETINA in HEALTH and DISEASE by DEBARSHI MUSTAFI Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

GENETIC SIGNATURES of the RETINA in HEALTH and DISEASE by DEBARSHI MUSTAFI Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements GENETIC SIGNATURES OF THE RETINA IN HEALTH AND DISEASE by DEBARSHI MUSTAFI Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Dissertation Advisor: Dr. Krzysztof Palczewski Department of Pharmacology CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY AUGUST 2013 CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF GRADUATE STUDIES We hereby approve the thesis/dissertation of DEBARSHI MUSTAFI candidate for the Ph.D degree *. (signed) Dr. Johannes Von Lintig (chair of the committee) Dr. Krzysztof Palczewski Dr. Robert A. Bonomo Dr. George Dubyak Dr. Andreas Engel Dr. Vera Moiseenkova-Bell Dr. Jonathan E. Sears (date) ___ May 31, 2013_______________ *We also certify that written approval has been obtained for any proprietary material contained therein ii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES……………………………………………………………………...viii LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………….....x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS………………………………………………………...….…xiv LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS…………………………………………………………..xvi ABSTRACT……………………………………………………………………………….1 CHAPTER 1: THE GENOTYPE TO PHENOTYPE QUESTION UNDERLYING VISION………………………………………………………………...2 1.1 The eye 1.1.1 Features of the eye across species……………………………………………....3 1.1.2 The retinal layer and the role of rod and cone photoreceptors………………….5 1.1.3 The importance of cone cells in the context of retinal disease………………….6 1.2 Cone phototransduction signaling 1.2.1 The first steps in visual response by cones………………………………….7 1.2.2 Structural dynamics of cone opsins during phototransduction……………...9 1.3 Evolutionary dynamics of the eye 1.3.1 Evolution of retinal circuitry……………………………………………….12 1.3.2 Evolution of cone photoreceptors……………………………………….…13 1.4 Structural features of cone photoreceptors 1.4.1 Cone disc renewal………………………………………………………….16 1.4.2 Cone disc morphogenesis………………………………………………….19 1.5 Mammalian models to better elucidate cone cell structure and function iii 1.5.1 Mouse models to study cone cells……………………………………………..22 1.5.2 Other mammalian rodent species for study of cone cells……………………...23 1.6 The genotypic to phenotype connection in the retina in the context of disease 1.6.1 High resolution phenotypic methods to reveal retinal architecture………..24 1.6.2 High throughput sequencing to reveal global gene expression patterns in the retina………………………………………………………………………25 1.7 Project approach……………………………………………………………………26 Figures…………………………………………………………………………...……...28 CHAPTER 2: PROGRESSIVE DEGENERATION IN MONOGENIC ENHANCED S-CONE SYNDROME IS DRIVEN BY ABBERANT RETINAL HOMEOSTASIS…………………………………………………………...38 2.1 The monogenic disease enhanced S-cone syndrome 2.1.1 The human condition and the corresponding mouse model of disease……39 2.2 Rationale and methodology to elucidate the degenerative component of ESCS 2.2.1 Rationale for research approach……………………………………………41 2.2.2 Materials and methods……………………………………………………..42 2.3 Results 2.3.1 Phenotypic features of human ESCS patients and the relationship of these features to the Nrl-/- mouse model………………………………………56 2.3.2 Transcriptome analysis by Illumina based RNA-Seq of retinas from Wt and Nrl-/- mice………………………………………………………………..59 2.3.3 Verification of sequencing data by RT-PCR………………………………60 iv 2.3.4 Characterization of differentially expressed transcripts…………………...61 2.3.5 Disrupted ESCS retinal architecture and patchy loss of photoreceptors…..63 2.3.6 ESCS photoreceptors exhibit abnormal accumulations of material……….64 2.3.7 Aberrant distribution of disc membranes influences abnormal packing architecture of ESCS photoreceptors…………………………………………….65 2.3.8 Evidence for aberrant phagocytosis in ESCS disease……………………...67 2.3.9 ESCS phenotype attributed to photoreceptor abnormalities rather than a RPE defect…………………………….…………………………………..69 2.4 Discussion and conclusions………………………………………………………...70 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………....77 Figures…………………………………………………………………………………..82 CHAPTER 3: DIFFERENTIAL BACKGROUND GENETIC NETWORKS DRIVE MULTIGENIC AGE-RELATED RETINAL DEGENERATION.………102 3.1 The multi-genic etiology of age-related retinal degeneration (ARD) 3.1.1 Age-related pathology in the eye and the genetic contributions Influencing disease…………………………………………………………….103 3.2 Rationale and methodology to multi-genic contributions driving ARD 3.2.1 Rationale for research approach………………………………………….104 3.2.2 Materials and methods……………………………………………………105 3.3 Results 3.3.1 A/J genetic background mice undergo pronounced age−related retinal degeneration……………………………………………………….…….109 v 3.3.2 ARD in A/J mice is accompanied by inflammatory cell infiltration and RPE cell pathology…………………………………………………………110 3.3.3 RNA−Seq reveals differential genetic background contributions to the transcriptome……………………………………………………………..112 3.3.4 Pathway analysis highlights inflammatory priming coupled with impaired retinal homeostatic cellular pathways in 1−month−old A/J mice before retinal pathology is evident……………………………………………...114 3.3.5 Inflammatory priming in A/J retina is exacerbated with age………..…...115 3.3.6 Marginally−expressed retinal homeostasis proteins exhibit abnormal RPE localization in A/J mice…………………………………………………...116 3.4 Discussion and conclusions…………………………………………………….....117 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………..124 Figures………………………………………………………………………………….129 CHAPTER 4: THE ROLE OF NON-CODING RNAs IN VISUAL FUNCTION……………………………………………………………..156 4.1 Delineating roles of long intergenic non-coding RNAs in the adult retina 4.1.1 Long intergenic non-coding RNAs and their possible physiological roles……………………………………………………………...157 4.2 Rationale and methodology to reveal evolutionary conservation of lincRNAs across species as a determinant of functional preservation in the eye 4.2.1 Rationale for research approach………………………………………….158 4.2.2 Materials and methods……………………………………………………159 vi 4.3 Results 4.3.1 RNA−Seq identifies eye lincRNAs that exhibit sequence conservation in mammals and those that exhibit conservation in the human retina and macular region………………………………………………………………….164 4.3.2 Tissue and eye compartment expression of conserved lincRNAs………..166 4.3.3 Expression of some conserved lincRNAs is localized to specific retinal layers…………………………………………………………...167 4.3.4 Genetic loci and in silico analyses of promoter motifs highlight possible roles of lincRNAs in adult retinal homeostasis……………………………..….168 4.4 Discussion and conclusions……………………………………………..………...169 Tables…………………………………………………………………………………..174 Figures……………………………………………………….………………………...181 CHAPTER 5: CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS…...………….......188 REFERENCES…………………………………………………...…………………....199 vii LIST OF TABLES Table1: GO term breakdown of transcript reads across different RNA-Seq experiments with Wt and Nrl-/- tissues…………………………………………………..77 Table 2: Fold changes of selected transcripts in Nrl-/- relative to Wt tissue across different experiments…………………………………………………………………….78 Table 3: Transcript levels of visual cycle proteins in Nrl-/- relative to Wt tissue across different RNA-Seq runs………………………………………………..…………79 Table 4: Transcript levels (in FPKM) of putative phagocytosis proteins in Nrl-/- relative to Wt tissue across different RNA-Seq runs……………………...…………….81 Table 5: GoTerm breakdown of transcript reads across different RNA−Seq experiments with from 1-month-old A/J, BALB/c and B6 mice whole eye tissue….....124 Table 6: Differential expression profile of genes in the A/J and B6 mouse eye and SNP analysis of differentially expressed genes……………………………..……..125 Table 7: Transcript reads (FPKM) of selected genes from A/J, BALB/c, and B6 mice as well as from Long-Evans rat and Nile rat eyes………………………..127 Table 8: Profile of 18 conserved lincRNAs in the eye across species…………………174 Table 9: Profile of 18 conserved lincRNAs in the retina across species………………175 Table 10: Transcript abundance (FPKM) in the eye and retina of B6 mice…………..176 Table 11: Profile of 18 conserved lincRNAs in 4 biological replicates of macaque macula tissue…………………………………………………………………177 Table 12: Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of conserved lincRNAs in organs and eye compartments of 1 month old C57BL/6 mice………………………………………….178 viii Table 13: Semi-quantitative RT-PCR of conserved lincRNAs in mice with different retinal environments……………………………………………………………………179 Table 14: In silico promoter analysis of conserved lincRNAs reveals binding sites for transcription factors that drive retinal processes……………………………...………..180 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Differences in photoreceptors and their arrangement in the retina……….....28 Figure 2: Distribution of photoreceptors in the eye………………………………...….29 Figure 3: The steps in cone phototransduction……………………………………..….30 Figure 4: Structure and renewal of rod and cone discs …………………….…………31 Figure 5: Homology model of S-cone (blue) opsin …………………..……………….32 Figure 6: Evolution of photoreceptors …………………………………..…………….33 Figure 7: Schematics of retinal sample preparation and FIB-SEM based experimentation…………………………………………………………………………34 Figure 8: Experimental set-up for photoreceptor observation with FIB-SEM technology……………………………………………………………………………....35 Figure 9: Schematic of SBF-SEM experimentation……………………………...……36 Figure 10: High-throughput sequencing reveals global gene expression patterns……..37 Figure 11: Key features of human ESCS disease and the Nrl-/- mouse model……..…..82 Figure 12: ESCS photoreceptors of Nrl-/- mice display aberrant packing……...………84 Figure 13: Reproducibility of murine eye RNA-Seq experiments and globally differentially expressed genes detected between Wt and Nrl-/- whole eyes…………….85 Figure 14: RNA-Seq of Wt and Nrl-/- retinas reveals
Recommended publications
  • Oup Radres Rrz001 289..297 ++
    Journal of Radiation Research, Vol. 60, No. 3, 2019, pp. 289–297 doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrz001 Advance Access Publication: 26 February 2019 Ionizing radiation affects the composition of the proteome of extracellular vesicles released by head-and-neck cancer cells in vitro Agata Abramowicz1, Anna Wojakowska1, Lukasz Marczak2, Malgorzata Lysek-Gladysinska3, Mateusz Smolarz1, Michael D. Story4, Joanna Polanska5, Piotr Widlak1 and Monika Pietrowska1,* 1Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska–Curie Institute–Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland 2Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences, ul. Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland 3The Jan Kochanowski University in Kielce, Institute of Biology, Department of Cell Biology and Electron Microscopy, ul. Swietokrzyska 15, 25-406 Kielce, Poland 4University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Molecular Radiation Biology, 5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, TX 75390, USA 5Faculty of Automatic Control, Electronics and Computer Science, Silesian University of Technology, ul. Akademicka 16, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland *Corresponding author. Center for Translational Research and Molecular Biology of Cancer, Maria Sklodowska–Curie Institute–Oncology Center, Gliwice Branch, ul. Wybrzeze Armii Krajowej 15, 44-101 Gliwice, Poland. Tel: +0048-32-278-9627; Fax: +0048-32-278-9840; Email: [email protected] (Received 29 August 2018; revised 7 November 2018; editorial decision 8 January 2019) ABSTRACT Exosomes and other extracellular vesicles are key players in cell-to-cell communication, and it has been proposed that they are involved in different aspects of the response to ionizing radiation, including transmitting the radiation-induced bystander effect and mediating radioresistance.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Information
    Supporting Information Figure S1. The functionality of the tagged Arp6 and Swr1 was confirmed by monitoring cell growth and sensitivity to hydeoxyurea (HU). Five-fold serial dilutions of each strain were plated on YPD with or without 50 mM HU and incubated at 30°C or 37°C for 3 days. Figure S2. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 3. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 3L, Tel 3R, CEN3, and the RP gene are shown under the panels. Figure S3. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) in the whole chromosome region are compared. The position of Tel 4L, Tel 4R, CEN4, SWR1, and RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S4. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on the region including the SWR1 gene of chromosome 4. The binding of Arp6- FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position and orientation of the SWR1 gene is shown. Figure S5. Localization of Arp6 and Swr1 on chromosome 5. The binding of Arp6-FLAG (top), Swr1-FLAG (middle), and Arp6-FLAG in swr1 cells (bottom) are compared. The position of Tel 5L, Tel 5R, CEN5, and the RP genes are shown under the panels. Figure S6. Preferential localization of Arp6 and Swr1 in the 5′ end of genes. Vertical bars represent the binding ratio of proteins in each locus.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Desensitization: Physiological Relevance of Arrestin-Dependent Signaling
    0031-6997/10/6202-305–330$20.00 PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS Vol. 62, No. 2 U.S. Government work not protected by U.S. copyright 2436/3586110 Pharmacol Rev 62:305–330, 2010 Printed in U.S.A. ASSOCIATE EDITOR: DAVID R. SIBLEY Beyond Desensitization: Physiological Relevance of Arrestin-Dependent Signaling LOUIS M. LUTTRELL AND DIANE GESTY-PALMER Departments of Medicine and Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, Medical University of South Carolina (L.M.L.) and the Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Medical Center (L.M.L.), Charleston, South Carolina; and Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center (D.G.-P.) and the Durham Veterans Affairs Medical Center (D.G.-P.), Durham, North Carolina Abstract ................................................................................ 305 I. Introduction............................................................................. 306 II. The duality of arrestin function ........................................................... 307 A. Arrestin-dependent desensitization and endocytosis...................................... 307 B. Arrestins as signal transducers ........................................................ 308 III. Arrestin signaling in vitro ................................................................ 310 A. Diversity in arrestin signaling ......................................................... 310 B. Receptor desensitization and second messenger production ............................... 311 C. Receptor endocytosis and vesicle trafficking ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ncounter® Mouse Autoimmune Profiling Panel - Gene and Probe Details
    nCounter® Mouse AutoImmune Profiling Panel - Gene and Probe Details Official Symbol Accession Alias / Previous Symbol Official Full Name Other targets or Isoform Information AW208573,CD143,expressed sequence AW208573,MGD-MRK- Ace NM_009598.1 1032,MGI:2144508 angiotensin I converting enzyme (peptidyl-dipeptidase A) 1 2610036I19Rik,2610510L13Rik,Acinus,apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer in the nucleus,C79325,expressed sequence C79325,MGI:1913562,MGI:1919776,MGI:2145862,mKIAA0670,RIKEN cDNA Acin1 NM_001085472.2 2610036I19 gene,RIKEN cDNA 2610510L13 gene apoptotic chromatin condensation inducer 1 Acp5 NM_001102405.1 MGD-MRK-1052,TRACP,TRAP acid phosphatase 5, tartrate resistant 2310066K23Rik,AA960180,AI851923,Arp1b,expressed sequence AA960180,expressed sequence AI851923,MGI:2138136,MGI:2138359,RIKEN Actr1b NM_146107.2 cDNA 2310066K23 gene ARP1 actin-related protein 1B, centractin beta Adam17 NM_001277266.1 CD156b,Tace,tumor necrosis factor-alpha converting enzyme a disintegrin and metallopeptidase domain 17 ADAR1,Adar1p110,Adar1p150,AV242451,expressed sequence Adar NM_001038587.3 AV242451,MGI:2139942,mZaADAR adenosine deaminase, RNA-specific Adora2a NM_009630.2 A2AAR,A2aR,A2a, Rs,AA2AR,MGD-MRK-16163 adenosine A2a receptor Ager NM_007425.2 RAGE advanced glycosylation end product-specific receptor AI265500,angiotensin precursor,Aogen,expressed sequence AI265500,MGD- Agt NM_007428.3 MRK-1192,MGI:2142488,Serpina8 angiotensinogen (serpin peptidase inhibitor, clade A, member 8) Ah,Ahh,Ahre,aromatic hydrocarbon responsiveness,aryl hydrocarbon
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table S4. FGA Co-Expressed Gene List in LUAD
    Supplementary Table S4. FGA co-expressed gene list in LUAD tumors Symbol R Locus Description FGG 0.919 4q28 fibrinogen gamma chain FGL1 0.635 8p22 fibrinogen-like 1 SLC7A2 0.536 8p22 solute carrier family 7 (cationic amino acid transporter, y+ system), member 2 DUSP4 0.521 8p12-p11 dual specificity phosphatase 4 HAL 0.51 12q22-q24.1histidine ammonia-lyase PDE4D 0.499 5q12 phosphodiesterase 4D, cAMP-specific FURIN 0.497 15q26.1 furin (paired basic amino acid cleaving enzyme) CPS1 0.49 2q35 carbamoyl-phosphate synthase 1, mitochondrial TESC 0.478 12q24.22 tescalcin INHA 0.465 2q35 inhibin, alpha S100P 0.461 4p16 S100 calcium binding protein P VPS37A 0.447 8p22 vacuolar protein sorting 37 homolog A (S. cerevisiae) SLC16A14 0.447 2q36.3 solute carrier family 16, member 14 PPARGC1A 0.443 4p15.1 peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma, coactivator 1 alpha SIK1 0.435 21q22.3 salt-inducible kinase 1 IRS2 0.434 13q34 insulin receptor substrate 2 RND1 0.433 12q12 Rho family GTPase 1 HGD 0.433 3q13.33 homogentisate 1,2-dioxygenase PTP4A1 0.432 6q12 protein tyrosine phosphatase type IVA, member 1 C8orf4 0.428 8p11.2 chromosome 8 open reading frame 4 DDC 0.427 7p12.2 dopa decarboxylase (aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase) TACC2 0.427 10q26 transforming, acidic coiled-coil containing protein 2 MUC13 0.422 3q21.2 mucin 13, cell surface associated C5 0.412 9q33-q34 complement component 5 NR4A2 0.412 2q22-q23 nuclear receptor subfamily 4, group A, member 2 EYS 0.411 6q12 eyes shut homolog (Drosophila) GPX2 0.406 14q24.1 glutathione peroxidase
    [Show full text]
  • (COPD) and Lung Cancer by Means of Cell Specific
    UNDERSTANDING SHARED PATHOGENESIS BETWEEN CHRONIC OBSTRUCTIVE PULMONARY DISEASE (COPD) AND LUNG CANCER BY MEANS OF CELL SPECIFIC GENOMICS CLARA EMILY GREEN A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY The Institute of Inflammation and Ageing College of Medical and Dental Sciences University of Birmingham February 2018 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. Abstract Introduction COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease) and lung cancer are related conditions associated with inflammation. Relatively little focus has been given to the endothelium, through which inflammatory cells transmigrate to reach the lung. We sought to determine if coding and non-coding alterations in pulmonary endothelium exist in COPD and lung cancer. Methods Patients with and without COPD undergoing thoracic surgery were recruited. Pulmonary Endothelial Cells were isolated from lung and tumour and extracted RNA (ribonucleic acid) used for miRNA (micro-RNA) and mRNA (messenger RNA) microarrays. Ingenuity pathway analysis (IPA) was also carried out. Results 2071 genes and 43 miRNAs were significantly upregulated in COPD. 4 targets were validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, of which miR-181b-3p was chosen for functional validation.
    [Show full text]
  • A Complex Structure of Arrestin-2 Bound to a G Protein-Coupled Receptor
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/822957; this version posted October 29, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. A complex structure of arrestin-2 bound to a G protein-coupled receptor Wanchao Yin1*, Zhihai Li1,2*, Mingliang Jin3*, Yu-Ling Yin1, 4*, Parker W. de Waal5, Kuntal Pal5,6, Yanting Yin1,5, Xiang Gao5, Yuanzheng He5,7, Jing Gao1, Xiaoxi Wang1, Yan Zhang8, Hu Zhou1, Karsten Melcher5, Yi Jiang1, Yao Cong3+, X. Edward Zhou5+, Xuekui Yu1,2+, H. Eric Xu1, 5+ 1The CAS Key Laboratory of Receptor Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China. 2Cryo-Electron Microscopy Research Center, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201203, China. 3National Center for Protein Science Shanghai, State Key Laboratory of Molecular Biology, CAS Center for Excellence in Molecular Cell Science, Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 201210, China. 4University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China. 5Center for Cancer and Cell Biology, Program for Structural Biology, Van Andel Research Institute, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA. 6Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Science and Biotechnology, Adamas University, Kolkata, India. 7Laboratory of Receptor Structure and Signaling, HIT Center for Life Science, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150001, China. 8Department of Pathology of Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital and Department of Biophysics, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou 310058, China.
    [Show full text]
  • GUCY2F Protein Recombinant Human Protein Expressed in Sf9 Cells
    Catalog # Aliquot Size G12-31G-20 20 µg G12-31G-50 50 µg GUCY2F Protein Recombinant human protein expressed in sf9 cells Catalog # G12-31G Lot # U1858-3 Product Description Purity Recombinant human GUCY2F (367-end) was expressed by baculovirus in Sf9 insect cells using an N-terminal GST tag. The gene accession number is BC156674. The purity of GUCY2F protein was determined to be >70% by Gene Aliases densitometry, GUCY2F approx. MW 110kDa. CYGF, GC-F, GUC2DL, GUC2F, RETGC-2, ROS-GC2 Formulation Recombinant protein stored in 50mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 150mM NaCl, 10mM glutathione, 0.1mM EDTA, 0.25mM DTT, 0.1mM PMSF, 25% glycerol. Storage and Stability Store product at –70oC. For optimal storage, aliquot target into smaller quantities after centrifugation and store at recommended temperature. For most favorable performance, avoid repeated handling and multiple freeze/thaw cycles. Scientific Background Guanylate cyclase 2F (GUCY2F) belongs to the adenylyl cyclase class-4/guanylyl cyclase family which also includes GUCY2D. Both GUCY2F and GUCY2D are responsible for the replenishment of cGMP in photoreceptors after exposure to light and are required for the normal kinetics of photoreceptor sensitivity and recovery, although disease mutations are restricted to GUCY2F Protein Full-length recombinant human protein expressed in sf9 cells GUCY2D. Catalog # G12-31G References Lot # U1858-3 1. Goraczniak R, et al: Structural and functional characteri- Purity >70% Concentration 0.05 µg/µl zation of a second subfamily member of the calcium- Stability 1yr at –70oC from date of shipment modulated bovine rod outer segment membrane Storage & Shipping Store product at –70oC.
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Determinants of Guanylate Cyclase Activating Protein
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Molecular determinants of Guanylate Cyclase Activating Protein subcellular distribution in Received: 1 August 2017 Accepted: 26 January 2018 photoreceptor cells of the retina Published: xx xx xxxx Santiago López-Begines 1,2, Anna Plana-Bonamaisó2 & Ana Méndez 1,2 Retinal guanylate cyclase (RetGC) and guanylate cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs) play an important role during the light response in photoreceptor cells. Mutations in these proteins are linked to distinct forms of blindness. RetGC and GCAPs exert their role at the ciliary outer segment where phototransduction takes place. We investigated the mechanisms governing GCAP1 and GCAP2 distribution to rod outer segments by expressing selected GCAP1 and GCAP2 mutants as transient transgenes in the rods of GCAP1/2 double knockout mice. We show that precluding GCAP1 direct binding to RetGC (K23D/GCAP1) prevented its distribution to rod outer segments, while preventing GCAP1 activation of RetGC post-binding (W94A/GCAP1) did not. We infer that GCAP1 translocation to the outer segment strongly depends on GCAP1 binding afnity for RetGC, which points to GCAP1 requirement to bind to RetGC to be transported. We gain further insight into the distinctive regulatory steps of GCAP2 distribution, by showing that a phosphomimic at position 201 is sufcient to retain GCAP2 at proximal compartments; and that the bovine equivalent to blindness-causative mutation G157R/GCAP2 results in enhanced phosphorylation in vitro and signifcant retention at the inner segment in vivo, as likely contributing factors to the pathophysiology. Retinal guanylate cyclases (RetGCs) and guanylate cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs) play a central role in pho- toreceptor cells of the retina.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Table 2
    Supplementary Table 2. Differentially Expressed Genes following Sham treatment relative to Untreated Controls Fold Change Accession Name Symbol 3 h 12 h NM_013121 CD28 antigen Cd28 12.82 BG665360 FMS-like tyrosine kinase 1 Flt1 9.63 NM_012701 Adrenergic receptor, beta 1 Adrb1 8.24 0.46 U20796 Nuclear receptor subfamily 1, group D, member 2 Nr1d2 7.22 NM_017116 Calpain 2 Capn2 6.41 BE097282 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 6.21 NM_053328 Basic helix-loop-helix domain containing, class B2 Bhlhb2 5.79 NM_053831 Guanylate cyclase 2f Gucy2f 5.71 AW251703 Tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily, member 12a Tnfrsf12a 5.57 NM_021691 Twist homolog 2 (Drosophila) Twist2 5.42 NM_133550 Fc receptor, IgE, low affinity II, alpha polypeptide Fcer2a 4.93 NM_031120 Signal sequence receptor, gamma Ssr3 4.84 NM_053544 Secreted frizzled-related protein 4 Sfrp4 4.73 NM_053910 Pleckstrin homology, Sec7 and coiled/coil domains 1 Pscd1 4.69 BE113233 Suppressor of cytokine signaling 2 Socs2 4.68 NM_053949 Potassium voltage-gated channel, subfamily H (eag- Kcnh2 4.60 related), member 2 NM_017305 Glutamate cysteine ligase, modifier subunit Gclm 4.59 NM_017309 Protein phospatase 3, regulatory subunit B, alpha Ppp3r1 4.54 isoform,type 1 NM_012765 5-hydroxytryptamine (serotonin) receptor 2C Htr2c 4.46 NM_017218 V-erb-b2 erythroblastic leukemia viral oncogene homolog Erbb3 4.42 3 (avian) AW918369 Zinc finger protein 191 Zfp191 4.38 NM_031034 Guanine nucleotide binding protein, alpha 12 Gna12 4.38 NM_017020 Interleukin 6 receptor Il6r 4.37 AJ002942
    [Show full text]
  • Interaction of GCAP1 with Retinal Guanylyl Cyclase and Calcium: Sensitivity to Fatty Acylation
    ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE published: 22 February 2012 MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE doi: 10.3389/fnmol.2012.00019 Interaction of GCAP1 with retinal guanylyl cyclase and calcium: sensitivity to fatty acylation Igor V. Peshenko , Elena V. Olshevskaya and Alexander M. Dizhoor* Department of Basic Science and Pennsylvania College of Optometry, Salus University, Elkins Park, PA, USA Edited by: Guanylyl cyclase activating proteins (GCAPs) are calcium/magnesium binding proteins Michael R. Kreutz, Leibniz-Institute within neuronal calcium sensor proteins group (NCS) of the EF-hand proteins superfamily. for Neurobiology, Germany GCAPs activate retinal guanylyl cyclase (RetGC) in vertebrate photoreceptors in response Reviewed by: to light-dependent fall of the intracellular free Ca2+ concentrations. GCAPs consist of four Carlo Sala, CNR Institute of Neuroscience, Italy EF-hand domains and contain N-terminal fatty acylated glycine, which in GCAP1 is required Karl-Wilhelm Koch, Carl von for the normal activation of RetGC. We analyzed the effects of a substitution prohibiting Ossietzky University Oldenburg, N-myristoylation (Gly2 → Ala) on the ability of the recombinant GCAP1 to co-localize with Germany its target enzyme when heterologously expressed in HEK293 cells. We also compared *Correspondence: Ca2+ binding and RetGC-activating properties of the purified non-acylated G2A mutant and Alexander M. Dizhoor, Department of Basic Science and Pennsylvania C14:0 acylated GCAP1 in vitro. The G2A GCAP1 expressed with a C-terminal GFP tag was College of Optometry, Salus able to co-localize with the cyclase, albeit less efficiently than the wild type, but much less University, 8360 Old York Road, effectively stimulated cyclase activity in vitro.Ca2+ binding isotherm of the G2A GCAP1 Elkins Park, PA 19027, USA.
    [Show full text]