Assured Fitness Returns Favor Sociality in a Mass-Provisioning Sweat Bee, Megalopta Genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Assured Fitness Returns Favor Sociality in a Mass-Provisioning Sweat Bee, Megalopta Genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) Behav Ecol Sociobiol (2003) 54:14–21 DOI 10.1007/s00265-003-0589-0 ORIGINAL ARTICLE Adam R. Smith · William T. Wcislo · Sean O’Donnell Assured fitness returns favor sociality in a mass-provisioning sweat bee, Megalopta genalis (Hymenoptera: Halictidae) Received: 8 April 2002 / Revised: 23 January 2003 / Accepted: 24 January 2003 / Published online: 19 March 2003 Springer-Verlag 2003 Abstract Assured fitness returns models for the evolu- Introduction tion of sociality emphasize the selective value of ensuring that offspring receive adequate parental care to reach Although much attention has been focused on the role of maturity. If a member of a social group dies, it can accrue high relatedness in promoting the evolution of eusociality returns on investment in offspring through the efforts of via kin selection (Hamilton 1964, reviewed in Queller and surviving social partners. We provide evidence that in the Strassmann 1998), recent studies of sweat bees (Halicti- mass-provisioning, facultatively social sweat bee Mega- dae) highlight the importance of extrinsic factors in lopta genalis, adult presence in the nest throughout brood favoring social over solitary behavior (Wcislo 1997a, development provides protection from ant predation. 2000). While some species of halictid bees are obligately Nests with adults present were well protected, and brood and permanently eusocial, members of some populations in nests with adults removed suffered higher predation. express both solitary reproduction and eusociality (re- Females in observation nests showed effective defensive viewed in Wcislo 1997a, 2000). Because of their ability to behavior against experimentally introduced ants, and bees switch between modes of social organization, individuals in natural nests repulsed naturally occurring ant raids. may exhibit solitary behavior when it is advantageous Megalopta nest architecture and behavior are such that over social behavior, and vice versa. Although current the brood of several cooperating females can be defended social flexibility may not represent an intermediate step with little additional cost relative to solitary nesting. The toward an evolutionary endpoint of obligate eusociality, benefits of cooperative defense may favor group living in socially flexible species can be used to test hypotheses for mass provisioning bees. Our observations and experi- the costs and benefits of group living (Danforth and ments suggest that parental care throughout brood devel- Eickwort 1997; Wcislo and Danforth 1997; Danforth opment can be adaptive in mass provisioning species, 2002; Soucy and Danforth 2002). supporting the predictions of assured fitness returns A key question that must be addressed in any expla- models. nation for the expression of social behavior is: Why do some adults forgo direct reproduction and act as helpers Keywords Assured fitness returns · Social evolution · rather than leave to found their own nests? Assured fitness Ant predation · Brood defense returns (AFR) models argue that patterns of adult mortality combine with offspring dependence on parental care to select for group living (Queller 1989, 1994, 1996; Strass- mann and Queller 1989; Gadagkar 1990, 1991; Bull and Schwarz 2001). AFR models posit that group living is selectively favored because it increases the likelihood of Communicated by R.F.A. Moritz fitness payoffs to parental and kin investment. In a social A. R. Smith ()) · S. O’Donnell group, if an adult dies before the brood reach maturity, Animal Behavior Area, Department of Psychology, other adults remain to provide parental care. Studies of University of Washington, progressive provisioning species (those species that must Seattle, WA 98195, USA feed offspring repeatedly throughout larval development) e-mail: [email protected] such as paper wasps and hover wasps (Vespidae), and Tel.: +1-206-5250403 Fax: +1-206-6853157 allodapine bees (Apidae) support AFR models (Queller 1989; Gadagkar 1990; Bull and Schwarz 1996, 1997; W. T. Wcislo Schwarz et al. 1997, 1998; Field et al. 2000; Hogendoorn et Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, al. 2001). In these cases the benefits are clear, because Unit 0948, APO AA 34002, Panama 15 progressively provisioned offspring would starve without 7951'W), Panam Province, Republic of Panam. BCNM is a continual feeding by adults. lowland tropical semi-deciduous moist forest with a pronounced dry season, usually from mid-December through mid-April (Rau Some social insect species, including halictid bees, are 1933; Leigh 1999). mass provisioners, meaning that females provide all necessary food for offspring development before laying an egg (Wilson 1971; Michener 1974). Because offspring Overview of natural history could potentially reach maturity even if the parent died M. genalis are collected at light traps the year round on BCI (Wolda immediately after oviposition, AFR models were not and Roubik 1986; Roubik and Wolda 2001), but they provision initially applied to mass provisioners (Queller 1989; nests and reproduce primarily in the dry season and first half of the Gadagkar 1990). However, mass-provisioned offspring wet season (for details of their nesting and social biology, see may be dependent on other forms of parental care, such as Arneson and Wcislo 2003; W.T. Wcislo et al., unpublished data.). Nests occur in relatively dry, broken sticks that are usually defense against nest predation and parasitism (Queller suspended in tangles of vegetation (Fig. 1; Sakagami 1964; Janzen 1994; Eickwort et al. 1996; Kukuk et al. 1998). For 1968). The nest entrance has a constricted collar made of chewed example, Eickwort et al. (1996) showed that the brood of wood, with a diameter slightly wider than the resident(s)’ head naturally orphaned solitary nests of a mass-provisioning, (Fig. 1c). The entrance opens into a single tunnel that has cells adjacent to it; cell entrances are flush with the tunnel wall (Fig. 1b). facultatively social bee, Halictus rubicundus, suffered At the start of the dry season, most nests (>75%) contain a greater fly parasitism than those with adults present at the solitary female. Females forage during the approximately 1.5 h time of nest collection. Similarly, Kukuk et al. (1998) after sunset and before dawn. Development from egg to adult takes showed that in the communal bee Lasioglossum approximately 35 days. Newly eclosed females are fed by older adult(s) for 1–14 days, and may then disperse or join the natal nest. hemichalceum, unattended brood suffered greater ant Females younger than 2 weeks have undeveloped ovaries. predation than brood protected by an adult. These studies Later in the dry season ~25–50% of nests have multiple females, were correlational. Experimental demonstration of selec- presumably because some daughters joined their natal nests. Multi- tive disadvantages if brood are orphaned would argue for female nests average 2.5€0.09 (SE) females, but group size varies the importance of parental care throughout brood devel- seasonally. Multi-female nests have up to ten females, although nests with more than four females are uncommon. Throughout the opment, and confirm the applicability of AFR models to year, some bees establish new nests, as inferred from the continual mass provisioning species. occurrence of singleton nests with one or a few brood cells. We used the facultatively social, Neotropical sweat Within multi-female observation nests, a dominant bee is bee Megalopta genalis (Halictidae: Augochlorini) to generally larger, older, mated and has fully developed ovaries; she rarely forages and frequently receives nectar from a subordinate experimentally test whether defense against predators via trophallaxis. In contrast, the subordinate(s) tend to be younger, may select for group living in a mass provisioning smaller, mated or unmated, and have slender or developed ovaries; species. Ant predation is a major threat to many social they are the primary foragers and frequently give nectar to insects (Jeanne 1975; Hlldobler and Wilson 1990; dominants via trophallaxis. The first brood has a female-biased sex ratio and the proportion of males increases throughout the Schwarz et al. 1998), and is especially strong in the season. Brood rearing is not synchronized and adults continue to tropics (Jeanne 1979; Kojima 1993). Thus, we focused forage as brood develop. The distribution of reproduction within our studies on M. genalis defense against ant predation. natural multi-female nests is not known, but based on dissections We investigated what contribution, if any, adult Mega- lopta made to nest defense against ants. If the brood rely on adult protection, Megalopta could realize improved fitness by living in groups and thereby avoid brood orphanage. We conducted three field studies. First, we observed naturally occurring M. genalis defense against ant preda- tion. We next experimentally removed adults from some M. genalis colonies, and predicted that nests with adult females would suffer less ant predation than orphaned nests. Finally, we observed bees in artificial nests to document their responses to invading ants, and we tested for the application of ant repellent chemicals at the nest entrance. We discuss the implications of our results for the adaptive value of group living in Megalopta, and in other mass provisioning species. Fig. 1a–c Megalopta genalis nest architecture. Both scale Methods bars=1 cm. a Cells inside the nest, constructed of chewed wood fiber: c exposed cells, o cells’ natural opening. b Sealed, Study site provisioned
Recommended publications
  • Sensory and Cognitive Adaptations to Social Living in Insect Societies Tom Wenseleersa,1 and Jelle S
    COMMENTARY COMMENTARY Sensory and cognitive adaptations to social living in insect societies Tom Wenseleersa,1 and Jelle S. van Zwedena A key question in evolutionary biology is to explain the solitarily or form small annual colonies, depending upon causes and consequences of the so-called “major their environment (9). And one species, Lasioglossum transitions in evolution,” which resulted in the pro- marginatum, is even known to form large perennial euso- gressive evolution of cells, organisms, and animal so- cial colonies of over 400 workers (9). By comparing data cieties (1–3). Several studies, for example, have now from over 30 Halictine bees with contrasting levels of aimed to determine which suite of adaptive changes sociality, Wittwer et al. (7) now show that, as expected, occurred following the evolution of sociality in insects social sweat bee species invest more in sensorial machin- (4). In this context, a long-standing hypothesis is that ery linked to chemical communication, as measured by the evolution of the spectacular sociality seen in in- the density of their antennal sensillae, compared with sects, such as ants, bees, or wasps, should have gone species that secondarily reverted back to a solitary life- hand in hand with the evolution of more complex style. In fact, the same pattern even held for the socially chemical communication systems, to allow them to polymorphic species L. albipes if different populations coordinate their complex social behavior (5). Indeed, with contrasting levels of sociality were compared (Fig. whereas solitary insects are known to use pheromone 1, Inset). This finding suggests that the increased reliance signals mainly in the context of mate attraction and on chemical communication that comes with a social species-recognition, social insects use chemical sig- lifestyle indeed selects for fast, matching adaptations in nals in a wide variety of contexts: to communicate their sensory systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Societies As Divided Organisms: the Complexities of Purpose and Cross-Purpose
    Insect societies as divided organisms: The complexities of purpose and cross-purpose Joan E. Strassmann* and David C. Queller Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Rice University, Houston, TX 77005 Individual organisms are complex in a special way. The organiza- explained aspects of biology that were nonadaptive conse- tion and function of their parts seem directed toward a purpose: quences of history, from vestigial organs and other homologies the survival and reproduction of that individual. Groups of organ- to biogeographical patterns. Our understanding that organisms isms are different. They may also be complex, but that is usually are a mix of historical constraint and adaptation by natural because their parts, the individual organisms, are working at selection has led to many successful predictions about the natural cross-purposes. The most obvious exception to this rule is the social world, whereas Paley’s theory stands mute about the details. In insects. Here, the individuals cooperate in complex ways toward other words, Darwin’s theory is much richer than a simple the common goal of the success of the colony, even if it means that explanation for design; it makes many further extensions and most of them do not reproduce. Kin selection theory explains how predictions. Some of these extensions and predictions were not this can evolve. Nonreproductive individuals help in the reproduc- fully appreciated in Darwin’s time. The last several decades have tion of their kin, who share and transmit their genes. Such help is seen increased attention to a further important question about most favored when individuals can give more to their kin than they the apparent design of organisms.
    [Show full text]
  • Provisioning Behavior and the Estimation of Investment Ratios in a Solitary Bee, Calh'opsis (Hypomacrotera) Persimilis (Cockerell) (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Bryan N
    Behav Ecol Sociobiol (1990) 27:159-168 Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology O Springer-Verlag 1990 Provisioning behavior and the estimation of investment ratios in a solitary bee, Calh'opsis (Hypomacrotera) persimilis (Cockerell) (Hymenoptera: Andrenidae) Bryan N. Danforth Snow Entomological Museum, Department of Entomology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-2106, USA Summary, One aspect of behavioral ecology that has male offspring production were calculated. Estimates of received considerable attention, especially by students the cost ratio based on the amount of time spent forag- of social insects, is the relative amount of energy invested ing, adult dry body weight, and pollen ball dry weight by parents in the rearing of male versus female offspring. all give similar values. Female offspring receive an ener- Sexual selection theory makes predictions about how getic investment of from 1.3 to 1.5 times that of males. individuals should allocate their total investment in the These results support the use of adult dry body weight sexes. To test these predictions we must accurately quan- ratios in the estimation of cost ratios. tify the relative "cost" incurred by a parent in the pro- duction of an average individual of either sex. Body weight ratios are the most common estimate of cost ra- tio, but the correspondence between offspring body Introduction weight and energetic investment on the part of the parent has rarely been determined. Calliopsis (Hypomaerotera) The relative amount of resources invested by parents persimilis is a solitary, ground-nesting bee whose natural in the total output of male versus female offspring is history makes it particularly convenient for studies of termed investment ratio.
    [Show full text]
  • Comparative Methods Offer Powerful Insights Into Social Evolution in Bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton
    Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton To cite this version: Sarah Kocher, Robert Paxton. Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees. Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 2014, 45 (3), pp.289-305. 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3. hal- 01234748 HAL Id: hal-01234748 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01234748 Submitted on 27 Nov 2015 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Apidologie (2014) 45:289–305 Review article * INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2014 DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0268-3 Comparative methods offer powerful insights into social evolution in bees 1 2 Sarah D. KOCHER , Robert J. PAXTON 1Department of Organismic and Evolutionary Biology, Museum of Comparative Zoology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA 2Institute for Biology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany Received 9 September 2013 – Revised 8 December 2013 – Accepted 2 January 2014 Abstract – Bees are excellent models for studying the evolution of sociality. While most species are solitary, many form social groups. The most complex form of social behavior, eusociality, has arisen independently four times within the bees.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functions and Evolution of Social Fluid Exchange in Ant Colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Marie-Pierre Meurville & Adria C
    ISSN 1997-3500 Myrmecological News myrmecologicalnews.org Myrmecol. News 31: 1-30 doi: 10.25849/myrmecol.news_031:001 13 January 2021 Review Article Trophallaxis: the functions and evolution of social fluid exchange in ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Marie-Pierre Meurville & Adria C. LeBoeuf Abstract Trophallaxis is a complex social fluid exchange emblematic of social insects and of ants in particular. Trophallaxis behaviors are present in approximately half of all ant genera, distributed over 11 subfamilies. Across biological life, intra- and inter-species exchanged fluids tend to occur in only the most fitness-relevant behavioral contexts, typically transmitting endogenously produced molecules adapted to exert influence on the receiver’s physiology or behavior. Despite this, many aspects of trophallaxis remain poorly understood, such as the prevalence of the different forms of trophallaxis, the components transmitted, their roles in colony physiology and how these behaviors have evolved. With this review, we define the forms of trophallaxis observed in ants and bring together current knowledge on the mechanics of trophallaxis, the contents of the fluids transmitted, the contexts in which trophallaxis occurs and the roles these behaviors play in colony life. We identify six contexts where trophallaxis occurs: nourishment, short- and long-term decision making, immune defense, social maintenance, aggression, and inoculation and maintenance of the gut microbiota. Though many ideas have been put forth on the evolution of trophallaxis, our analyses support the idea that stomodeal trophallaxis has become a fixed aspect of colony life primarily in species that drink liquid food and, further, that the adoption of this behavior was key for some lineages in establishing ecological dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Components of Nest Provisioning Behavior in Solitary Bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)*
    Apidologie 39 (2008) 30–45 Available online at: c INRA/DIB-AGIB/ EDP Sciences, 2008 www.apidologie.org DOI: 10.1051/apido:2007055 Review article Components of nest provisioning behavior in solitary bees (Hymenoptera: Apoidea)* John L. Neff Central Texas Melittological Institute, 7307 Running Rope, Austin, Texas 78731, USA Received 13 June 2007 – Revised 28 September 2007 – Accepted 1 October 2007 Abstract – The components of nest provisioning behavior (resources per cell, transport capacity, trip dura- tion, trips per cell) are examined for a data set derived from the literature and various unpublished studies. While there is a trade-off between transport capacity and trips required per cell, the highest provisioning rates are achieved by bees carrying very large pollen loads at intermediate trip durations. Most solitary bees appear to be either egg or resource limited, so sustained provisioning rates over one cell per day are unusual. Provisioning rate / body size / transport capacity / solitary bees / trip duration 1. INTRODUCTION tradeoffs between provisioning one large cell or two small cells direct, indirect, or nonex- There is a vast literature on the foraging tac- istent? Are provisioning rates related to body tics of bees: what kinds of flowers to visit, how size? long to spend on a flower, how many flowers Provisioning rate is a general term and can in an inflorescence to visit, when to turn, and simply refer to the rate (mass per unit time) so forth. Much of this work is done within a at which foragers bring various food items framework of whether a forager should max- (pollen, nectar, oils, carrion, or whatever) to imize harvesting rate or foraging efficiency their nests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Parental Care Strategies in Subsocial Wasps
    ORE Open Research Exeter TITLE The evolution of parental care strategies in subsocial wasps AUTHORS Field, J; Gonzalez-Voyer, A; Boulton, RA JOURNAL Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology DEPOSITED IN ORE 10 June 2020 This version available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/121347 COPYRIGHT AND REUSE Open Research Exeter makes this work available in accordance with publisher policies. A NOTE ON VERSIONS The version presented here may differ from the published version. If citing, you are advised to consult the published version for pagination, volume/issue and date of publication Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology (2020) 74:78 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02853-w ORIGINAL ARTICLE The evolution of parental care strategies in subsocial wasps Jeremy Field1 & Alejandro Gonzalez-Voyer2 & Rebecca A. Boulton1 Received: 8 May 2020 /Revised: 8 May 2020 /Accepted: 21 May 2020 # The Author(s) 2020 Abstract Insect parental care strategies are particularly diverse, and prolonged association between parents and offspring may be a key precursor to the evolution of complex social traits. Macroevolutionary patterns remain obscure, however, due to the few rigorous phylogenetic analyses. The subsocial sphecid wasps are a useful group in which to study parental care because of the diverse range of strategies they exhibit. These strategies range from placing a single prey item in a pre-existing cavity to mass provi- sioning a pre-built nest, through to complex progressive provisioning where a female feeds larvae in different nests simulta- neously as they grow. We show that this diversity stems from multiple independent transitions between states. The strategies we focus on were previously thought of in terms of a stepping-stone model in which complexity increases during evolution, ending with progressive provisioning which is a likely precursor to eusociality.
    [Show full text]
  • Apidae: Meliponini)
    J Comp Physiol A DOI 10.1007/s00359-016-1118-8 ORIGINAL PAPER Body size limits dim‑light foraging activity in stingless bees (Apidae: Meliponini) Martin Streinzer1,2 · Werner Huber3 · Johannes Spaethe1,4 Received: 23 March 2016 / Revised: 28 July 2016 / Accepted: 29 July 2016 © The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com Abstract Stingless bees constitute a species-rich tribe ocelli diameter, ommatidia number, and facet diameter. of tropical and subtropical eusocial Apidae that act as All parameters significantly correlated with body size. important pollinators for flowering plants. Many foraging A disproportionately low light intensity threshold in tasks rely on vision, e.g. spatial orientation and detection the minute Trigonisca pipioli, together with a large eye of food sources and nest entrances. Meliponini workers parameter Peye suggests specific adaptations to circumvent are usually small, which sets limits on eye morphology the optical constraints imposed by the small body size. and thus quality of vision. Limitations are expected both We discuss the implications of body size in bees on forag- on acuity, and thus on the ability to detect objects from ing behavior. a distance, as well as on sensitivity, and thus on the for- aging time window at dusk and dawn. In this study, we Keywords Meliponini · Light intensity threshold · Vision · determined light intensity thresholds for flight under dim Compound eye · Body size light conditions in eight stingless bee species in relation to body size in a Neotropical lowland rainforest. Species varied in body size (0.8–1.7 mm thorax-width), and we Introduction found a strong negative correlation with light intensity thresholds (0.1–79 lx).
    [Show full text]
  • Behavioral Phylogeny of Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with Special Reference to Social Behavior
    Cladistics 18, 137±153 (2002) doi:10.1006/clad.2001.0191, available online at http://www.idealibrary.com on Behavioral Phylogeny of Corbiculate Apidae (Hymenoptera; Apinae), with Special Reference to Social Behavior Fernando B. Noll1 Museum of Biological Diversity, Department of Entomology, The Ohio State University, 1315 Kinnear Road, Columbus, Ohio 43212 Accepted September 25, 2000 The phylogenetic relationships among the four tribes of Euglossini (orchid bees, about 175 species), Bombini corbiculate bees (Euglossini, Bombini, Meliponini, and (bumblebees, about 250 species), Meliponini (stingless Apini) are controversial. There is substantial incongru- bees, several hundred species), and Apini (honey bees, ence between morphological and molecular data, and the about 11 species) (Michener, 2000), that belong to the single origin of eusociality is questionable. The use of Apinae, a subfamily of long-tongued bees. They all behavioral characters by previous workers has been possess apical combs (the corbiculae) on the females' restricted to some typological definitions, such as soli- tibiae as well as several other morphological synapo- tary and eusocial. Here, I expand the term ªsocialº to 42 morphies (with the exception of the parasitic forms, characters and present a tree based only on behavioral and the queens of highly eusocial species). In addition, characters. The reconstructed relationships were similar with the exception of the Euglossini and the social to those observed in morphological and ªtotal evidenceº parasite Psithyrus in Bombini, all corbiculate bees are ؉ ؉ ؉ analyses, i.e., Euglossini (Bombini (Meliponini social. Apini)), all of which support a single origin of euso- Despite many studies that have focused on the classi- ciality. ᭧ 2002 The Willi Hennig Society ®cation and phylogeny of bees, many authors do not agree on one classi®cation and one phylogeny.
    [Show full text]
  • Convergent Selection on Juvenile Hormone Signaling Is Associated with the Evolution of Eusociality in Bees
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.04.14.439731; this version posted April 14, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Jones, Rubin, Dudchenko et al., 2021 – preprint version - bioRxiv Convergent selection on juvenile hormone signaling is associated with the evolution of eusociality in bees Beryl M. Jones1,2,*, Benjamin E.R. Rubin1,2,*, Olga Dudchenko3,4,*, Karen M. Kapheim5, Eli S. Wyman1,2, Brian G. St. Hilaire3, Weijie Liu1,2, Lance R. Parsons2, S. RaElle Jackson2, Katharine Goodwin2, Shawn M. Davidson2, Callum J. Kingwell6,7, Andrew E. Webb1,2, Mauricio Fernández Otárola8, Melanie Pham3, Arina D. Omer3, David Weisz3, Joshua Schraiber9,10, Fernando Villanea9,11, William T. Wcislo7, Robert J. Paxton12,13, Brendan G. Hunt14, Erez Lieberman Aiden3,4,15,16,ⱡ, Sarah D. Kocher1,2,ⱡ,§ *These authors contributed equally ⱡThese authors contributed equally §Corresponding Author: [email protected] 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, USA 2Lewis-Sigler Institute for Integrative Genomics, Princeton University, USA 3The Center for Genome Architecture, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, USA 4Center for Theoretical Biological Physics, Rice University, USA 5Department of Biology, Utah State University, USA 6Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, USA 7Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, 0843-03092 Panama
    [Show full text]
  • Size Clines but Not Saw Tooth Clines in Sweat Bees: Season Length, Body Size A
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Open Research Exeter Ecological Entomology (2017), DOI: 10.1111/een.12448 Season length, body size, and social polymorphism: size clines but not saw tooth clines in sweat bees PAUL J. DAVISON∗ andJEREMY FIELD∗ School of Life Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, U.K. Abstract. 1. Annual insects are predicted to grow larger where the growing season is longer. However, transitions from one to two generations per year can occur when the season becomes sufficiently long, and are predicted to result in a sharp decrease inbody size because available development time is halved. The potential for resulting saw-tooth clines has been investigated only in solitary taxa with free-living larvae. 2. Size clines were investigated in two socially polymorphic sweat bees (Halictidae): transitions between solitary and social nesting occur along gradients of increasing season length, characterised by the absence or presence of workers and offspring that are individually mass provisioned by adults. How the body size changes with season length was examined, and whether transitions in social phenotype generate saw-tooth size clines. We measured Lasioglossum calceatum and Halictus rubicundus nest foundresses originating from more than 1000 km of latitude, encompassing the transition between social and solitary nesting. 3. Using satellite-collected temperature data to estimate season length, it was shown that both species were largest where the season was longest. Body size increased linearly with season length in L. calceatum and non-linearly in H. rubicundus but the existence of saw-tooth clines was not supported.
    [Show full text]
  • (Native) Bee Basics
    A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Cover Art: Upper panel: The southeastern blueberry bee Habropoda( laboriosa) visiting blossoms of Rabbiteye blueberry (Vaccinium virgatum). Lower panel: Female andrenid bees (Andrena cornelli) foraging for nectar on Azalea (Rhododendron canescens). A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication Bee Basics: An Introduction to Our Native Bees By Beatriz Moisset, Ph.D. and Stephen Buchmann, Ph.D. Illustrations by Steve Buchanan A USDA Forest Service and Pollinator Partnership Publication United States Department of Agriculture Acknowledgments Edited by Larry Stritch, Ph.D. Julie Nelson Teresa Prendusi Laurie Davies Adams Worker honey bees (Apis mellifera) visiting almond blossoms (Prunus dulcis). Introduction Native bees are a hidden treasure. From alpine meadows in the national forests of the Rocky Mountains to the Sonoran Desert in the Coronado National Forest in Arizona and from the boreal forests of the Tongass National Forest in Alaska to the Ocala National Forest in Florida, bees can be found anywhere in North America, where flowers bloom. From forests to farms, from cities to wildlands, there are 4,000 native bee species in the United States, from the tiny Perdita minima to large carpenter bees. Most people do not realize that there were no honey bees in America before European settlers brought hives from Europe. These resourceful animals promptly managed to escape from domestication. As they had done for millennia in Europe and Asia, honey bees formed swarms and set up nests in hollow trees.
    [Show full text]