Airborne Wind Energy Powerweb Webinar Lecture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Airborne Wind Energy Powerweb Webinar Lecture Airborne Wind Energy PowerWeb webinar lecture Roland Schmehl 2 Presenter • Associate Professor at Delft University of Technology • Co-founder of Kitepower BV • Coordinator of 2 H2020 projects (AWESCO & REACH) • AWE-responsible PI in Dutch NWO project NEON • Co-organizer of AWEC 2015, 2017 and 2019 • Co-editor and editor of 2 Springer textbooks on AWE 3 2013 2018 4 Outline • Fundamental working principles • Classification of concepts • Implemented technology demonstrators • Development challenges • Research challenges • Development of the sector 5 Fundamental concepts Miles L. Loyd (1980) Drag power: Lift power: ● Flying wing ⇝ shaft power ● Flying wing ⇝ traction force ● Shaft power ⇝ electricity (ω ↑ ) ● Traction force ⇝ shaft power (ω ↓ ) ● Electricity ⇝ conductive tether ● Shaft power ⇝ electricity 6 Key aspects + ● Consumes significantly less material ● Highly adjustable to wind resource ● Access to high altitude wind Image source: Skysails ● Increased mobility – ● More complex than turbines ● Requires reliable & robust control ● Depends on high-performance materials ● Need to revise current regulatory framework 7 Technology demonstrators Kitepower Enerkíte Ampyx Power Kitemill Twingtec Introduction Skysails KPS Skypull Windswept eWindSolutions Aerospace Engineering – Open Days – 8 6 March 2020 9 AWES classification Man-lifting kite train (1930) Elelectricity Flight operation generation Kitemill EnerKíte ~ Kitepower ~ KiteGen stem Skypull Ampyx ~ Kitenergy ~ SkySails Power ➡crosswind TwingTec KPS eWind E-Kite Kiteswarms Solutions ➡ with fixed GS ➡tether-aligned Omnidea Laddermill Guangdong HAWP Windswept Vertical take-off and ➡rotational someAWE landing (VTOL) Kitewinder Horizontal take-off and ~ X-Wind loop track landing (HTOL) AWE ➡ with moving GS ➡crosswind system ~ KiteGen carousel Multi-drone concepts Ligther-than-air concepts Makani Windlift ~ Flexible wing concepts ➡crosswind KiteKraft KiteX ➡ on flying device Altaeros Bladetips Sky WindPower ➡rotational Magenn Brainwhere Adapted from: Watson et al. “Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: a European perspective”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019. 10 AWES classification Man-lifting kite train (1930) Elelectricity Flight operation generation Kitemill EnerKíte ~ Kitepower ~ KiteGen stem Skypull Ampyx ~ Kitenergy ~ SkySails Power ➡crosswind TwingTec KPS eWind E-Kite Kiteswarms Solutions ➡ with fixed GS ➡tether-aligned Omnidea Laddermill Guangdong HAWP Windswept Vertical take-off and ➡rotational someAWE landing (VTOL) Kitewinder Horizontal take-off and ~ X-Wind loop track landing (HTOL) AWE ➡ with moving GS ➡crosswind system ~ KiteGen carousel Multi-drone concepts Ligther-than-air concepts Makani Windlift ~ Flexible wing concepts ➡crosswind KiteKraft KiteX ➡ on flying device Altaeros Bladetips Sky WindPower ➡rotational Magenn Brainwhere Adapted from: Watson et al. “Future emerging technologies in the wind power sector: a European perspective”, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2019. 11 Further reading: a esco!eu"aMan-lifting e#explained kite train (1930) 12 Technology demonstrators • Makani • Ampyx • Twingtec • Kitepower 13 Wing7 ('( kW* California 2013 14 +,(( (,(( kW* California 2017 15 Norway 2019 16 AP#2 (.( )W* Noordoostpolder 2013 17 AP#' (-.( )W* Marin 2018 18 19 20 WIND ENERGY 2.0 2019 21 22 TwingTec pilot next to turbine with same power 23 -. kW kite po er system 2012 24 2012 25 System components 26 TU Delft V3 25 m2 Genetrix Hydra 14 m2 TU Delft V3 25 m2 27 TU Delft V3 25 m2 Genetrix Hydra 14 m2 TU Delft V3 25 m2 0.974 m 0.876 m 2.55 m 2.03 m 30 31 2012 Automatic pumping cycles at Maasvlakte II of Rotterdam Harbor 32 34 /aunch from upside#down position • The following three videos show the same launch attempt on 2 August 2012 • The videos are taken from three different positions – GoPro video camera on the ground next to mast – GoPro video camera taped to the leading edge – Photo camera on the ground • Weak link ruptures as result of sudden tether disengagement from mast head 38 1( m- kite 2017 39 2(( kW ground station 40 41 42 43 44 Kite par) po er output 45 46 Kite de3elopment: 25 – 4( – 6( m- 47 Kite de3elopment: 1(( m- 48 49 Flight days 160 Actual flight days per quarter 140 Cumulative flight days 120 100 s y a 80 D 60 40 20 0 2016 Q2 Q3 Q4 2017 Q2 Q3 Q4 2018 Q2 Q3 Q4 2019 Q2 Q3 Q4 Quarter 56D landscape NLR E-Kite ECN Xsens academia Aenarete Kitemill industry -(28 Ampyx Power DTU-Wind Kitepower KiteX TU Delft Fraunhofer IWES KU Leuven SkySails Power Windswept & Interesting Anurac University of Strathclyde Chalmers University Kite Power Systems University of Bonn KiteSwarms EnerKíte University of Limerick TU Berlin Grenoble INP Skypoint-e ENSTA Bretagne TU Munich Kitewinder University of Stuttgart Beyond the Sea® University of Freiburg AirSeas / Airbus ABB Corporate Research UC3 Madrid University of Applied Omnidea Sciences of Northwest Switzerland Upwind TwingTec University of Victoria ETH Zurich eWind Solutions EPFL Oregon State University Skypull Sky WindPower University of Zagreb Makani / X Politecnico Milano Stanford University University of Trento KiteGen AirLoom Energy Kitenergy UNC Charlotte TMIT WindLift Kyushu University University of Delaware Guangdong HAWP Technology Worchester Polytechnic Institute Altitude Energy Altaeros Energies UF Santa Catarina RMIT University 51 9hallenges • Reliability & Safety – None of the projects has proven more than a few days of operation – Operation in kite parks • Durability of materials – Tether and kite are critical components • Regulations – Interference with air traffic and ground use 52 :/M simulation 53 CF7 analysis 54 Oehler & Schmehl. "Aerodynamic characterization of a soft kite by in situ flow measurement". Wind Energy Science, 2019 55 56 57 CFD simulation with OpenFOAM Streamlines around the kite colored With the spanwise velocity component, 6 computed for Re=3x10 and 12° AoA 59 Relative flow TU Delft V3 kite measurement setup Oehler & Schmehl. "Aerodynamic characterization of a soft kite by in situ flow measurement". Wind Energy Science, 2019 60 Norway 2019 61 Ef0ect of po er powered ● Changes chordwise force distribution ● Powering up the wing makes wing pitch backwards depowered g Oehler & Schmehl. "Aerodynamic characterization of a soft kite by in situ flow measurement". Wind Energy Science, 2019 62 Ef0ect of po er ● Wing flattens ● Force increase also by area increase depowered powered Oehler & Schmehl. "Aerodynamic characterization of a soft kite by in situ flow measurement". Wind Energy Science, 2019 63 Aerodynamics 64 Aerodynamics 65 Aerodynamics Fluid-Structure Interaction simulation of a ram air wing section Aeroelastic bending and torsion of a half wing supported by a bridle line Wijnja, Schmehl, De Breuker, Jensen and Vander Lind: "Aeroelastic Analysis of a Large Airborne Wind Turbine". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018 Aeroelastic model of an AWT and the tensile support system connecting it to the ground Wijnja, Schmehl, De Breuker, Jensen and Vander Lind: "Aeroelastic Analysis of a Large Airborne Wind Turbine". Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics, 2018 69 Kite par) layout row ro w n n m m lu u l co o c wind wind Faggiani & Schmehl. “Design and Economics of a Pumping Kite Wind Park". In: Schmehl (ed.) "Airborne Wind Energy - Advances in Technology Development and Research", Springer, 2018 70 Kite par) po er output 2000 8 x 8 kites 1500 ] W 1000 k [ r 4 x 4 kites e w o 500 P 0 1 kite -500 0 200 400 600 800 1000 Time [s] Faggiani & Schmehl. “Design and Economics of a Pumping Kite Wind Park". In: Schmehl (ed.) "Airborne Wind Energy - Advances in Technology Development and Research", Springer, 2018 71 Sa0ety & reliability 400 m Flight zone Operational zone Operational zone 70 m 20 m 2 m airborne wind energy airborne wind energy KITEPOWER KITEPOWER 65 m 50 m 50 m 300 m Danger zone Danger zone Safety zone Ground Ground station station Salma, Friedl & Schmehl: "Improving Reliability and Safety of Airborne Wind Energy Systems", Wind Energy, 2019 (C) (A) (B) (D) (E) 2012/08/02 Salma, Friedl & Schmehl: "Improving Reliability and Safety of Airborne Wind Energy Systems", Wind Energy, 2019 74 Kite par) po er output ;uestions< [email protected] twitter.com/kite_power awesco.eu.
Recommended publications
  • Investigation of Innovative Structuers and Materials of the Towers Used in Wind Turbines
    SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING INVESTIGATION OF INNOVATIVE STRUCTUERS AND MATERIALS OF THE TOWERS USED IN WIND TURBINES Rawane Abdaoui Suppurvised by : Abderrazzak El Boukili May 3rd / 2018 Table of Contents Table of Figures .......................................................................................................................... 3 Abstract ...................................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 8 STEEPLE ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................... 11 Chapter 1: General Overview on Wind Turbines ...................................................................... 13 How is wind created?..................................................................................................................... 13 Types of Turbines based on the site .................................................................................................. 16 Offshore wind farms ...................................................................................................................... 16 Onshore wind farms ...................................................................................................................... 17 Types of Wind Turbines based on formalities ..................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing the Visual Impact of Onshore Wind Farms Upon the Landscapes – Comparing Recent Planning Approaches in China and Germany
    Ruhr-Universität Bochum Dissertation Submission to the Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Faculty of Geosciences For the degree of Doctor of natural sciences (Dr. rer. nat) Submitted by: Jinjin Guan. MLA Date of the oral examination: 16.07.2020 Examiners Dr. Thomas Held Prof. Dr. Harald Zepp Prof. Dr. Guotai Yan Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Friederich Prof. Dr. Harro Stolpe Keywords Onshore wind farm planning; landscape; landscape visual impact evaluation; energy transition; landscape visual perception; GIS; Germany; China. I Abstract In this thesis, an interdisciplinary Landscape Visual Impact Evaluation (LVIE) model has been established in order to solve the conflicts between onshore wind energy development and landscape protection. It aims to recognize, analyze, and evaluate the visual impact of onshore wind farms upon landscapes and put forward effective mitigation measures in planning procedures. Based on literature research and expert interviews, wind farm planning regimes, legislation, policies, planning procedures, and permission in Germany and China were compared with each other and evaluated concerning their respective advantages and disadvantages. Relevant theories of landscape evaluation have been researched and integrated into the LVIE model, including the landscape connotation, landscape aesthetics, visual perception, landscape functions, and existing evaluation methods. The evaluation principles, criteria, and quantitative indicators are appropriately organized in this model with a hierarchy structure. The potential factors that may influence the visual impact have been collected and categorized into three dimensions: landscape sensitivity, the visual impact of WTs, and viewer exposure. Detailed sub-indicators are also designed under these three topics for delicate evaluation. Required data are collected from official platforms and databases to ensure the reliability and repeatability of the evaluation process.
    [Show full text]
  • Theme 1 | Mini-Symposia WESC 2021
    Theme 1 | Mini-Symposia Mini-Symposium: Advances in Lattice Boltzmann Methods in Wind Energy Stefan Ivanell, Henrik Asmuth (Uppsala University) Mini-Symposium: Advances in Lattice Boltzmann Methods in Wind Energy May 25 13:40 - 15:20 CEST Session Chairs: Stefan Ivanell (Uppsala University) (moderators) Henrik Asmuth (Uppsala University) Time Duration Speaker Affiliation Title 13:45 - 14:15 25 + 5 min Manfed Krafczyk TU Braunschweig GPGPU-accelerated Urban Scale Wind Simulations based on Lattice-Boltzmann methods Eastern Switzerland University Investigation of the influence of the inlet boundary conditions on the turbulent flow over 14:15 - 14:35 15 + 5 min Alain Schubiger of Applied Sciences a smooth 3-D hill 14:35 - 14:55 15 + 5 min Henrik Asmuth Uppsala University Lattice Boltzmann Large-eddy Simulation of Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layers Friedrich-Alexander University A Holistic CPU/GPU Approach for the Actuator Line Model in Lattice Boltzmann 14:55 - 15:15 15 + 5 min Helen Schottenhamml Erlangen Simulations Session briefing: starting from 12:30 CEST (same virtual room) WESC 2021 Theme 1 | Mini-Symposia Mini-Symposium: Array-Array Interactions and Downstream Wake Effects Rebecca J. Barthelmie, Sara C. Pryor (Cornell University), Charlotte Hasager (DTU Wind Energy) Mini-Symposium: Array-Array Interactions and Downstream Wake Effects (I) May 25 15:30 - 17:10 CEST Session Chairs: Sara C. Pryor (Cornell University) (moderators) Charlotte Hasager (DTU Wind Energy) Time Duration Speaker Affiliation Title 15:30 - 15:50 15 + 5 min Jana
    [Show full text]
  • Design and Access Statement April 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN and ACCESS STATEMENT
    Energiekontor UK Ltd Design and Access Statement April 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT Contents Section Page 1. Introduction 2 2. Site Selection 3 3. Design Influences 7 4. Design Evolution, Amount, Layout and Scale 9 5. Development Description, Appearance and Design 14 6. Access 16 Figures Page 2.1 Site Location 3 2.2 Landscape character areas 4 2.3 1945 RAF Fulbeck site plan 5 2.4 Site selection criteria 6 4.1 First Iteration 10 4.2 Second Iteration 11 4.3 Third Iteration 12 4.4 Fourth Iteration 13 5.1 First Iteration looking SW from the southern edge of Stragglethorpe 14 5.2 Fourth Iteration looking SW from the southern edge of 14 Stragglethorpe 5.3 First Iteration looking east from Sutton Road south of Rectory Lane 15 5.4 Fourth Iteration looking east from Sutton Road south of Rectory Lane 15 6.1 Details of temporary access for turbine deliveries 16 EnergieKontor UK Ltd 1 May 2015 FULBECK AIRFIELD WIND FARM DESIGN AND ACCESS STATEMENT 1 Introduction The Application 1.8 The Fulbeck Airfield Wind Farm planning application is Context 1.6 The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) process also submitted in full and in addition to this Design and Access exploits opportunities for positive design, rather than merely Statement is accompanied by the following documents 1.1 This Design and Access Statement has been prepared by seeking to avoid adverse environmental effects. The Design which should be read together: Energiekontor UK Ltd (“EK”) to accompany a planning and Access Statement is seen as having an important role application for the construction, 25 year operation and in contributing to the design process through the clear Environmental Statement Vol 1; subsequent decommissioning of a wind farm consisting of documentation of design evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Energy & Wildlife
    WIND ENERGY & WILDLIFE: Benefits for companies purchasing wind energy, wind Site it Right energy developers and financiers, consumers, and wildlife. central great plains grasslandscollaborating to conserve America’s most impacted habitat THE CHALLENGE The Nature Conservancy supports the development of A REAL LIFE EXAMPLE: renewable energy, such as wind, as an emission-free source of electricity. Economically viable wind resources Company XYZ was looking to purchase wind-generated and ecologically important areas, however, show some electricity, both to meet forecasted energy needs, and to overlap in the Central Great Plains. This overlap raises satisfy the company’s own initiative for sustainability, concerns that wildlife populations may be seriously which promotes the use of renewable energy, along impacted by commercial wind energy development. As a with other sustainable practices. XYZ issued a request for proposals for 100 megawatts (MW) of wind energy, result, power purchasers should be aware of this overlap, beginning in 2017. Several proposals were received and and more importantly, know how to avoid wildlife XYZ reviewed them, selecting company “ABC” as the impacts and the risks of procuring wind power from lowest-cost provider. A power purchase agreement was projects sited in sensitive habitat areas. signed, and XYZ’s CEO was pleased. rasslands are an important part of Gthe country’s cultural, economic and natural history, and are the most altered and least conserved landscapes on earth. The results of this decline are staggering. Almost three-quarters of the breeding bird species in the United States survive in the prairies of the Great Plains. Historically, some of these birds were widely distributed and found in vast numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Control of Power Kites for Wind Power Production
    FACULDADE DE ENGENHARIA DA UNIVERSIDADE DO PORTO Optimal Control of Power Kites for Wind Power Production Tiago Costa Moreira Maia PREPARATION FOR THE MSC DISSERTATION Master in Electrical and Computers Engineering Supervisor: Fernando Arménio da Costa Castro e Fontes Co-Supervisor: Luís Tiago de Freixo Ramos Paiva February 7, 2014 c Tiago Costa Moreira Maia, 2014 Abstract Ground based wind energy systems have reached the peak of their capacity. Wind instability, high cost of installations and small power output of a single unit are some of the the limitations of the current design. In order to become competitive the wind energy industry needs new methods to extract energy from the wind. The Earth’s surface creates a boundary layer effect on the wind that increases its speed with altitude. In fact, with altitude the wind is not only stronger, but steadier. In order to capitalize these strong streams new extraction methods were proposed. One of these solutions is to drive a generator using a tethered kite. This concept allows very large power outputs per unit. The major goal of this work is to study a possible trajectory of the kite in order to maximize the power output using an optimal control software - Imperial College London Optimal Control Software (ICLOCS), model and optimize it. i ii Contents 1 Introduction1 1.1 Context . .1 1.2 Motivation . .2 1.3 Objectives . .2 1.4 Document Structure . .2 2 State of the Art5 2.1 High Wind Energy . .5 2.2 High Wind Energy Systems . .6 2.3 The Laddermill . .9 2.3.1 Dynamic Model the Tethered Kite System .
    [Show full text]
  • Offshore Renewables: Offshore
    OFFSHORE RENEWABLES: OFFSHORE OFFSHORE AN ACTION AGENDA FOR DEPLOYMENT RENEWABLES An action agenda for deployment OFFSHORE RENEWABLES A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY An action agenda for deployment A CONTRIBUTION TO THE G20 PRESIDENCY www.irena.org 2021 © IRENA 2021 © IRENA 2021 Unless otherwise stated, material in this publication may be freely used, shared, copied, reproduced, printed and/or stored, provided that appropriate acknowledgement is given of IRENA as the source and copyright holder. Material in this publication that is attributed to third parties may be subject to separate terms of use and restrictions, and appropriate permissions from these third parties may need to be secured before any use of such material. Citation: IRENA (2021), Offshore renewables: An action agenda for deployment, International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi. ISBN 978-92-9260-349-6 About IRENA The International Renewable Energy Agency (IRENA) serves as the principal platform for international co-operation, a centre of excellence, a repository of policy, technology, resource and financial knowledge, and a driver of action on the ground to advance the transformation of the global energy system. An intergovernmental organisation established in 2011, IRENA promotes the widespread adoption and sustainable use of all forms of renewable energy, including bioenergy, geothermal, hydropower, ocean, solar and wind energy, in the pursuit of sustainable development, energy access, energy security and low-carbon economic growth and prosperity. www.irena.org Acknowledgements IRENA is grateful for the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation (Directorate-General for Global Affairs, DGMO) contribution that enabled the preparation of this report in the context of the Italian G20 Presidency.
    [Show full text]
  • IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report
    IEA WIND 2012 Annual Report Executive Committee of the Implementing Agreement for Co-operation in the Research, Development, and Deployment of Wind Energy Systems of the International Energy Agency July 2013 ISBN 0-9786383-7-9 Message from the Chair Welcome to the IEA In 2013, we expect to approve Recommended Wind 2012 Annual Re- Practices on social acceptance of wind energy proj- port of the coopera- ects, on remote wind speed sensing using SODAR tive research, develop- and LIDAR, and on conducting wind integration ment, and deployment studies. The 12 active research tasks of IEA wind will (R,D&D) efforts of our offer members many options to multiply their na- member governments and tional research programs, and a new task on ground- organizations. IEA Wind based testing of wind turbines and components is helps advance wind en- being discussed for approval in 2013. ergy in countries repre- With market challenges and ever-changing re- senting 85% of the world's search issues to address, the IEA Wind co-operation wind generating capacity. works to make wind energy an ever better green In 2012 record ca- option for the world's energy supply. Considering pacity additions (MW) these accomplishments and the plans for the coming were seen in nine member countries, and coop- years, it is with great satisfaction and confidence that erative research produced five final technical re- I hand the Chair position to Jim Ahlgrimm of the ports as well as many journal articles and confer- United States. ence papers. The technical reports include: • IEA
    [Show full text]
  • Wind Power: Energy of the Future It’S Worth Thinking About
    Wind power: energy of the future It’s worth thinking about. »Energy appears to me to be the first and unique virtue of man.« Wilhelm von Humboldt 2 3 »With methods from the past, there will be no future.« Dr. Bodo Wilkens Wind power on the increase »Environmental protection is an opportunity and not a burden we have to carry.« Helmut Sihler When will the oil run out? Even if experts cannot agree on an exact date, one thing is certain: the era of fossil fuels is coming to an end. In the long term we depend on renewable sources of energy. This is an irrefutable fact, which has culminated in a growing ecological awareness in industry as well as in politics: whereas renewable sources of energy accounted for 4.2 percent of the total consumption of electricity in 1996, the year 2006 registered a proportion of 12 per- cent. And by 2020 this is to be pushed up to 30 percent. The growth of recent years has largely been due to the use of wind power. The speed of technical development over the past 15 years has brought a 20-fold rise in efficiency and right now wind power is the most economical regenerat- ive form there is to produce electricity. In this respect, Germany leads the world: since 1991 more than 19.460 wind power plants have been installed with a wind power capacity of 22.247 MW*. And there is more still planned for the future: away from the coastline, the offshore plants out at sea will secure future electricity supplies.
    [Show full text]
  • Kite Power Technologie
    KITE POWER TECHNOLOGIE Het besturingssysteem hangt ongeveer 10 m onder de vlieger Roland Schmehl Associate Professor, Institute for Applied Sustainable Science, Engineering and Technology (ASSET), TU Delft De wind hoog boven de grond wordt gezien als een potentieel zeer grote bron van duurzame energie. Conventionele windturbines met hun starre toren zullen nooit in staat zijn deze bron ten volle te benutten. Eén van de mogelijke oplossingen om deze wind op grote hoogte te benutten, is het gebruik van kite power systemen. De kite power onderzoeksgroep van het ASSET instituut aan de TU Delft is bezig met de ontwikkeling van een kite power systeem gebaseerd op pompende cycli. Het 20 kW test systeem maakt gebruik van een enkele kabel die de kite met de grond verbindt. De kite wordt bestuurd door middel van een besturingssyseem onder de kite. Systematische tests in 2010 hebben bevestigd dat het pompende concept geïmplementeerd kan worden met een relatief laag energieverlies veroorzaakt door de pompende beweging. Het concept is Alle afbeeldingen bij dit artikel: een aantrekkelijke optie voor het onttrekken van windenergie van grote Asset, TU Delft hoogte en heeft de potentie om significant goedkoper energie te produceren dan conventionele windturbines. 22 WIND NIEUWS - APRIL 2011 Figuur 1: Energie producerende fase (kabel uitrollen) en energie consumerende fase (kabel inrollen). High altitude wind power Het onttrekken van windenergie van grote hoogte brengt een aantal voordelen met zich mee. Ten eerste het feit dat de wind op hoogte harder en constanter is dan de wind waartoe conventionele windturbines toegang hebben. Hierdoor kunnen vliegende wind energie (Airborne Wind Energy, AWE) systemen, die boven de 150 m ingezet kunnen worden, een substantieel hogere capaci - teits factor hebben.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy
    Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy March 2020 Udo Zillmann Kristian Petrick Stefanie Thoms www.airbornewindeurope.org 1 § Introduction to Airborne Wind Energy Agenda § Airborne Wind Energy – principle and concepts § Advantages § Challenges § Airborne Wind Europe § Meeting with DG RTD www.airbornewindeurope.org 2 § AWE principle and concepts Overview § Principles § Ground generation § On-board generation § Different types § Soft wing § Rigid wing § Semi-rigid wing § Other forms www.airbornewindeurope.org 3 § AWE principle Ground generation (“ground gen”) or yo-yo principle Kite flies out in a spiral and creates a tractive pull force to the tether, the winch generates electricity as it is being reeled out. Kite Tether Winch Tether is retracted back as kite flies directly back to the starting point. Return phase consumes a few % of Generator power generated, requires < 10 % of total cycle time. www.airbornewindeurope.org 4 § AWE principle On-board generation (“fly-gen”) Kite flies constantly cross-wind, power is produced in the on-board generators and evacuated through the tether www.airbornewindeurope.org 5 § AWE principle The general idea: Emulating the movement of a blade tip but at higher altitudes Source: Erc Highwind https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UmN3MiR65E Makani www.airbornewindeurope.org 6 § AWE principle Fundamental idea of AWE systems • With a conventional wind turbine, the outer 20 % of the blades (the fastest moving part) generates about 60% of the power • AWE is the logical step to use only a fast flying device that emulates the blade tip. www.airbornewindeurope.org 7 § AWE concepts Concepts of our members – soft, semi-rigid and rigid wings www.airbornewindeurope.org 8 § AWE Concept Overview of technological concepts Aerostatic concepts are not in scope of this presentation Source: Ecorys 2018 www.airbornewindeurope.org 9 § AWE Concept Rigid kite with Vertical Take Off and Landing (VTOL) 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Laddermill - Innovative Wind Energy from High Altitudes in Holland and Australia
    Published at: Windpower 06, Adelaide, Australia The Laddermill - Innovative Wind Energy from High Altitudes in Holland and Australia Bas Lansdorp Delft University, The Netherlands Paul Williams RMIT University, Melbourne, Australia Abstract The Laddermill is a novel concept to harvest electricity from high altitude winds. The concept’s operating principle is to drive an electric generator using tethered kites. Several kites are deployed to altitudes of more than 1 km by means of a single cable that is connected to a drum on the groundstation. The upper portion of the cable is connected to the high altitude kites, whereas the lower portion of the cable remains wound around the drum. The kites are controlled to pull the cable from the drum, which in turn drives a generator. After most of the cable is pulled off the drum at high tension, the kites are controlled to fly down in a configuration that generates significantly less lift than during the ascent, thereby reducing the cable tension. The lower portion of the tether is retrieved onto the drum and the process is repeated. The concept allows very large power outputs from single units. The Laddermill concept is being studied at Delft University of Technology, with additional assistance from RMIT University. As part of this cooperative effort, Delft has gathered significant practical experience, including successful demonstration of a small-scale 2 kW Laddermill, as well as having investigated alternative groundstation designs and other kite concepts. At RMIT, modelling, optimisation, and control design for the system has been studied. This paper presents a summary of some of these achievements and will report on future plans.
    [Show full text]