Trichoptera : Limnephilidae)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Trichoptera : Limnephilidae) CARNIVORY BY AN AQUATIC DETRITIVORE, CLISTORONIA MAGNIFICA ( TRICHOPTERA : LIMNEPHILIDAE) N. H. ANDERSON Reprinted from ECOLOGY Vol. 57, No. 5, Late Summer 1976 pp. 1081-1085 Made in the United States of America Ecology (1976)57: pp. 1081-1085 CARNIVORY BY AN AQUATIC DETRITIVORE, CLISTORONIA MAGNIFICA (TRICHOPTERA: LIMNEPHILIDAE)12 N. H. ANDERSON Department of Entomology, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331 USA Abstract. The limnephilid caddisfly, Clistoronia magnifica, was reared through three generations on a detritus-based diet enriched with wheat grains and green grass. Developmental time was reduced and weight of mature larvae and pupae was increased by addition of enchytraeid worms to the above diet. Supplemental feeding on animals is also likely in the field but its importance would be underestimated because, in comparison with detritus, animal tissue would be a small component of the gut contents. Key words: Caddisfly; carnivore; detritivore; feeding habits; growth rate; Oregon; rearing. INTRODUCTION and photoperiod, could also be contributing factors. Cummins (1973) review of trophic relations of The experiments reported herein were designed to aquatic insects indicates that a significant portion of determine whether the quality or vigor of laboratory the material cycling and energy flow in freshwater cultures of the caddisfly Clistoronia magnifica (Banks) systems involves the processing of organic matter could be improved by augmenting a plant-based diet by insects. Studies of ingestion, using visual analysis with some animal food. of gut contents, (e.g., Brown 1961, Thorup and The only field data for C. magnifica are from Iversen 1974, Hall and Pritchard 1975) have demon- Winterbourns (1971a) study from Marion Lake, strated that plant detritus forms the base of most B.C. He described it as an early-season univoltine food webs in these systems. Gut analysis is useful species inhabiting submerged marginal vegetation and in demonstrating the processing accomplished by open sediments throughout the lake. Based on gut aquatic insects. However, as Cummins (1973) sug- content analysis of 35 specimens, he classified C. gests, nutritional interpretation of the data is diffi- magnifica as a sediment feeder. The gut contained cult because items digested rapidly, and therefore a mixture of plant fragments, algal cells, amorphous least likely to be observed, may be the most nu- detritus and a very few arthropod remains. He tritious. Worms and other soft-bodied invertebrates could not determine whether the animals were are digested rapidly and their retention time in the `actively selected or ingested along with the sediment. gut will be short. Similarly, the microbial flora However, he implied that the prey ingestion was of associated with detritus is difficult to census but it is minor importance in C. magnifica and in the other more nutritious than the more obvious, but highly detritivores studied because there was rarely more refractory, lignin and cellulose components. than one to three animal fragments present in guts This study is part of a project on developing dominated by detritus. methods for continuous culture of aquatic insects. Studies of growth and trophic relations could then be METHODS AND MATERIALS based on the entire larval interval instead of restricted The C. magnifica culture was initiated from egg to short-term feeding trials or to gut analysis. In my masses collected from Fay Lake, Linn County, laboratory I have reared several limnephilid caddis- Oregon, in the Cascade Mountains. Larvae were flies, including species of Hesperophylax, Hydato- reared in aerated pans of tap water with sand sub- phylax, Limnephilus and Pseudostenophylax, through strate at 15.6°C and long days (16 h light : 8 h dark). a complete generation on a detritus diet. However, Pans were washed and the water replaced once or compared with field material the resulting adults twice a week to remove fecal material and excess were frequently undersized. Also, some had mal- decomposing food. formed wings and others failed to emerge from the Alder leaves (Alnus rubra), conditioned in water pupal exuviae. It seemed probable that these results for 1-2 wk to allow microbial colonization, were were due to the nutritional inadequacy of the food, the basic food for the first-generation larvae. Conifer though rearing conditions, especially temperature needles, conditioned for several months, were used primarily for case construction but may also have Manuscript received 29 August 1975; accepted 10 been ingested. Wheat grains and green grass were May 1976. also provided. These were readily consumed within Technical Paper No. 4083, Oregon Agricultural Ex- periment Station. Contribution No. 189 from the Conif- a few hours, demonstrating that microbial coloniza- erous Forest Biome. tion was not a prerequisite for feeding on these foods. 1082 N. H. ANDERSON Ecology, Vol. 57, No. 5 Care was taken not to have an excess of wheat as index of food consumption. Some larvae were dry the fermentation and/or deoxygenation from decom- weighed at this time to compare weights between position led to high mortality. In the later instars, the treatment and control larvae. the use of grass in the diet was discontinued largely The worm-supplement feeding was repeated with because it was not convenient to maintain a supply. larvae of the third laboratory generation in drippery Second-generation larvae were obtained from trays, starting with 30 larvae about 7 wk old (15 late laboratory-reared adults. The initial experiment was third- and 15 early fourth-instar larvae) in each of conducted with third-instar larvae (6 wk old) to the experimental and control groups. These larvae determine whether they would feed on live inverte- were progeny of adults that had been reared on the brates, and if so, the effects on growth and fecal standard vegetative-based diet. The larvae were production. White worms (Enchytraeidae) from a reared to newly-moulted pupae, at which time they laboratory culture were used as prey. Fifteen larvae could be sexed, and were then dry weighed. In were placed in a petri dish with sand, conifer needles, addition to comparing pupal weights between treat- and half of a conditioned alder leaf (150 mg dry wt) ments, the rate of larval development was compared and 12 white worms 8 mg dry wt). A control without sacrificing the larvae, using instar duration, dish with 15 larvae, paired by case length with the case size, and type of case constructed as criteria. worm-fed group, was set up with sand, conifer needles and the other half of the alder leaf. The RESULTS dishes were examined daily or every 2nd day for 10 Second-generation C. magnifica larvae with the days. Each time, the feces were removed from worm-supplement feeding initiated in the third instar the food and substrate by several rinsings and moulted about 1 wk earlier than the group fed on then collected by filtration on Millipore® mem- alder leaves and were 50% heavier after 30 days brane filters (5 pm pore size). Fecal collections (Table 1). Expressed as a growth rate, the worm- were dried at 60°C for 24 h and weighed. Twelve supplement group increased 0.14 mg/day compared live worms were added each time the dishes with .08 mg/day for control larvae. Fecal produc- were cleaned. The caddisfly larvae were observed tion rates were consistently higher for the control, feeding on the worms but no attempt was made to suggesting a lower assimilation efficiency of the quantify the amount consumed because of the diffi- detritus-based food (Table 1). culty of recognizing and collecting the fragments The data indicate that development rate of mid- of the dead worms. instar larvae was enhanced by the food supplement, Five larvae from both the experimental and con- but the apparent difference in growth rates could trol series were sacrified on day 10 for a compari- have been overestimated. The experiment was ter- son of weights. These were dried for 24 h at 60°C minated when the control series had all moulted to and then weighed. The remaining 10 larvae in each fourth instar. By this time most of the worm- series were reared until all had moulted to the fourth supplement group had been fourth instars for several instar (to day 30) and then dry-weighed individually. days and had completed the rapid spurt of growth An excess of alder leaves, and worm supplement in that characteristically occurs in the early part of an the experimental dish, was maintained. instar. Worm-supplement feeding was also conducted with Even with the addition of wheat to the diets, the second-generation larvae taken from the stock cul- trend for greater growth is also apparent for the ture at 12 wk when the larvae where late fourth or worm-supplement group of second-generation larvae early fifth instar. Differences in procedure from the reared from late fourth instar to the prepupal stage first trial were: (1) the control and experimental (Table 2). This interval represents all of the final diets included wheat grains, as this was standard for instar, which is the major feeding and growth period the stock cultures; (2) rearing was continued until when 80% of the total tissue is elaborated. The the larvae sealed off their cases for pupation, that results are consistent with those obtained for third- is, after achieving maximum growth; (3) experiments instar larvae, with more rapid development and were carried out in a "drippery," a series of trays heavier larvae being produced with the worm supple- with a variable rate of water exchange (Anderson ment. There was no difference in case length for 1973), to minimize 02 deficits due to decomposing the mature larvae of the two groups. The daily wheat or worms. growth rate for the final 10-12 wk of larval de- The cultures were examined at least twice a week velopment was 0.31 mg/day in the worm supple- and food added if needed.
Recommended publications
  • List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017
    Washington Natural Heritage Program List of Animal Species with Ranks October 2017 The following list of animals known from Washington is complete for resident and transient vertebrates and several groups of invertebrates, including odonates, branchipods, tiger beetles, butterflies, gastropods, freshwater bivalves and bumble bees. Some species from other groups are included, especially where there are conservation concerns. Among these are the Palouse giant earthworm, a few moths and some of our mayflies and grasshoppers. Currently 857 vertebrate and 1,100 invertebrate taxa are included. Conservation status, in the form of range-wide, national and state ranks are assigned to each taxon. Information on species range and distribution, number of individuals, population trends and threats is collected into a ranking form, analyzed, and used to assign ranks. Ranks are updated periodically, as new information is collected. We welcome new information for any species on our list. Common Name Scientific Name Class Global Rank State Rank State Status Federal Status Northwestern Salamander Ambystoma gracile Amphibia G5 S5 Long-toed Salamander Ambystoma macrodactylum Amphibia G5 S5 Tiger Salamander Ambystoma tigrinum Amphibia G5 S3 Ensatina Ensatina eschscholtzii Amphibia G5 S5 Dunn's Salamander Plethodon dunni Amphibia G4 S3 C Larch Mountain Salamander Plethodon larselli Amphibia G3 S3 S Van Dyke's Salamander Plethodon vandykei Amphibia G3 S3 C Western Red-backed Salamander Plethodon vehiculum Amphibia G5 S5 Rough-skinned Newt Taricha granulosa
    [Show full text]
  • UFRJ a Paleoentomofauna Brasileira
    Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ www.anuario.igeo.ufrj.br A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual The Brazilian Fossil Insects: Current Scenario Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Scheler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Geociências: Patrimônio Geopaleontológico, Museu Nacional, Quinta da Boa Vista s/nº, São Cristóvão, 20940-040. Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brasil. E-mails: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Recebido em: 24/01/2018 Aprovado em: 08/03/2018 DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11137/2018_1_142_166 Resumo O presente trabalho fornece um panorama geral sobre o conhecimento da paleoentomologia brasileira até o presente, abordando insetos do Paleozoico, Mesozoico e Cenozoico, incluindo a atualização das espécies publicadas até o momento após a última grande revisão bibliográica, mencionando ainda as unidades geológicas em que ocorrem e os trabalhos relacionados. Palavras-chave: Paleoentomologia; insetos fósseis; Brasil Abstract This paper provides an overview of the Brazilian palaeoentomology, about insects Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including the review of the published species at the present. It was analiyzed the geological units of occurrence and the related literature. Keywords: Palaeoentomology; fossil insects; Brazil Anuário do Instituto de Geociências - UFRJ 142 ISSN 0101-9759 e-ISSN 1982-3908 - Vol. 41 - 1 / 2018 p. 142-166 A Paleoentomofauna Brasileira: Cenário Atual Dionizio Angelo de Moura-Júnior; Sandro Marcelo Schefler & Antonio Carlos Sequeira Fernandes 1 Introdução Devoniano Superior (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004). Os insetos são um dos primeiros organismos Algumas ordens como Blattodea, Hemiptera, Odonata, Ephemeroptera e Psocopera surgiram a colonizar os ambientes terrestres e aquáticos no Carbonífero com ocorrências até o recente, continentais (Engel & Grimaldi, 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • (Trichoptera: Limnephilidae) in Western North America By
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Robert W. Wisseman for the degree of Master ofScience in Entomology presented on August 6, 1987 Title: Biology and Distribution of the Dicosmoecinae (Trichoptera: Limnsphilidae) in Western North America Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: N. H. Anderson Literature and museum records have been reviewed to provide a summary on the distribution, habitat associations and biology of six western North American Dicosmoecinae genera and the single eastern North American genus, Ironoquia. Results of this survey are presented and discussed for Allocosmoecus,Amphicosmoecus and Ecclisomvia. Field studies were conducted in western Oregon on the life-histories of four species, Dicosmoecusatripes, D. failvipes, Onocosmoecus unicolor andEcclisocosmoecus scvlla. Although there are similarities between generain the general habitat requirements, the differences or variability is such that we cannot generalize to a "typical" dicosmoecine life-history strategy. A common thread for the subfamily is the association with cool, montane streams. However, within this stream category habitat associations range from semi-aquatic, through first-order specialists, to river inhabitants. In feeding habits most species are omnivorous, but they range from being primarilydetritivorous to algal grazers. The seasonal occurrence of the various life stages and voltinism patterns are also variable. Larvae show inter- and intraspecificsegregation in the utilization of food resources and microhabitatsin streams. Larval life-history patterns appear to be closely linked to seasonal regimes in stream discharge. A functional role for the various types of case architecture seen between and within species is examined. Manipulation of case architecture appears to enable efficient utilization of a changing seasonal pattern of microhabitats and food resources.
    [Show full text]
  • Effects of a Low Head Dam on a Dominant Detritivore and Detrital Processing in a Headwater Stream
    EFFECTS OF A LOW HEAD DAM ON A DOMINANT DETRITIVORE AND DETRITAL PROCESSING IN A HEADWATER STREAM. A Thesis by BRETT MATTHEW TORNWALL Submitted to the Graduate School Appalachian State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE May 2011 Department of Biology EFFECTS OF A LOW HEAD DAM ON A DOMINANT DETRITIVORE AND DETRITAL PROCESSING IN A HEADWATER STREAM. A Thesis By BRETT MATTHEW TORNWALL May 2011 APPROVED BY: ____________________________________ Robert Creed Chairperson, Thesis Committee ____________________________________ Michael Gangloff Member, Thesis Committee ____________________________________ Michael Madritch Member, Thesis Committee ____________________________________ Steven Seagle Chairperson, Department of Biology ____________________________________ Edelma D. Huntley Dean, Research and Graduate Studies Copyright by Brett Matthew Tornwall 2011 All Rights Reserved FOREWARD The research detailed in this thesis will be submitted to Oikos, an international peer-reviewed journal owned by John Wiley and Sons Inc. and published by the John Wiley and Sons Inc. Press. The thesis has been prepared according to the guidelines of this journal. ABSTRACT EFFECTS OF A LOW HEAD DAM ON A DOMINANT DETRITIVORE AND DETRITAL PROCESSING IN A HEADWATER STREAM. (May 2011) Brett Matthew Tornwall, B.S., University of Florida M.S., Appalachian State University Chairperson: Robert Creed The caddisfly Pycnopsyche gentilis is a dominant detritivore in southern Appalachian streams. A dam on Sims Creek selectively removes P. gentilis from downstream reaches. I evaluated the breakdown of yellow birch leaves in the presence and absence of P. gentilis using a leaf pack breakdown experiment. Leaf packs were placed in reaches above the dam where P. gentilis is present and below the dam where it is essentially absent.
    [Show full text]
  • Coral Reef Food Web ×
    This website would like to remind you: Your browser (Apple Safari 4) is out of date. Update your browser for more × security, comfort and the best experience on this site. Illustration MEDIA SPOTLIGHT Coral Reef Food Web Journey Through the Trophic Levels of a Food Web For the complete illustrations with media resources, visit: http://education.nationalgeographic.com/media/coral-reef-food-web/ A food web consists of all the food chains in a single ecosystem. Each living thing in an ecosystem is part of multiple food chains. Each food chain is one possible path that energy and nutrients may take as they move through the ecosystem. Not all energy is transferred from one trophic level to another. Energy is used by organisms at each trophic level, meaning that only part of the energy available at one trophic level is passed on to the next level. All of the interconnected and overlapping food chains in an ecosystem make up a food web. Similarly, a single organism can serve more than one role in a food web. For example, a queen conch can be both a consumer and a detritivore, or decomposer. Food webs consist of different organism groupings called trophic levels. In this example of a coral reef, there are producers, consumers, and decomposers. Producers make up the first trophic level. A producer, or autotroph, is an organism that can produce its own energy and nutrients, usually through photosynthesis or chemosynthesis. Consumers are organisms that depend on producers or other consumers to get their food, energy, and nutrition. There are many different types of consumers.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Minnesota Caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera)
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services Minnesota Department of Natural Resources BIODIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA CADDISFLIES (INSECTA: TRICHOPTERA) A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY DAVID CHARLES HOUGHTON IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Ralph W. Holzenthal, Advisor August 2002 1 © David Charles Houghton 2002 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS As is often the case, the research that appears here under my name only could not have possibly been accomplished without the assistance of numerous individuals. First and foremost, I sincerely appreciate the assistance of my graduate advisor, Dr. Ralph. W. Holzenthal. His enthusiasm, guidance, and support of this project made it a reality. I also extend my gratitude to my graduate committee, Drs. Leonard C. Ferrington, Jr., Roger D. Moon, and Bruce Vondracek, for their helpful ideas and advice. I appreciate the efforts of all who have collected Minnesota caddisflies and accessioned them into the University of Minnesota Insect Museum, particularly Roger J. Blahnik, Donald G. Denning, David A. Etnier, Ralph W. Holzenthal, Jolanda Huisman, David B. MacLean, Margot P. Monson, and Phil A. Nasby. I also thank David A. Etnier (University of Tennessee), Colin Favret (Illinois Natural History Survey), and Oliver S. Flint, Jr. (National Museum of Natural History) for making caddisfly collections available for my examination. The laboratory assistance of the following individuals-my undergraduate "army"-was critical to the processing of the approximately one half million caddisfly specimens examined during this study and I extend my thanks: Geoffery D. Archibald, Anne M.
    [Show full text]
  • Martina Hortvíková
    MASARYKOVA UNIVERZITA PŘÍRODOVĚDECKÁ FAKULTA ÚSTAV BOTANIKY A ZOOLOGIE PREDAČNĚ-DISTURBAČNÍ EFEKT BLEŠIVCE POTOČNÍHO NA POČETNOST LAREV DVOUKŘÍDLÝCH V PRAMENNÉM BIOTOPU Diplomová práce Martina Hortvíková Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Vít Syrovátka, Ph.D. Brno 2016 Bibliografický záznam Autor: Bc. Martina Hortvíková Přírodovědecká fakulta, Masarykova univerzita Ústav botaniky a zoologie Název práce: Predačně-disturbační efekt blešivce potočního na početnost larev dvoukřídlých v pramenném biotopu Studijní program: Chemie Studijní obor: Učitelství chemie pro střední školy Učitelství biologie pro střední školy Vedoucí práce: Mgr. Vít Syrovátka, Ph.D. Akademický rok: 2015/2016 Počet stran: 61+6 Klíčová slova: Blešivec potoční, Gammarus fossarum, predace, prameništní slatiniště, prameniště, minerotrofní gradient, pH, Chironomidae, Ceratopogonidae, Atrichopogon, Oligochaeta, obsah střeva Bibliographic Entry Author Bc. Martina Hortvíková Faculty of Science, Masaryk University Department of Botany and Zoology Title of Thesis: Predator-disturbance effect of Gammarus fossarum on the abundance of Diptera larvae at a spring biotope Degree programme: Chemistry Upper Secondary School Teacher Training in Field of Study: Chemistry Upper Secondary School Teacher Training in Biology Supervisor: Mgr. Vít Syrovátka, Ph.D. Academic Year: 2015/2016 Number of Pages: 61+6 Keywords: Gammarus fossarum, predation, spring fens, minerotrophic gradient, pH, Chironomidae, Ceratopogonidae, Atrichopogon, Oligochaeta, gut content Abstrakt Prameniště jsou vodní biotopy s relativně
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Wilderness Stream Ecosystems
    United States Department of Monitoring Agriculture Forest Service Wilderness Stream Rocky Mountain Ecosystems Research Station General Technical Jeffrey C. Davis Report RMRS-GTR-70 G. Wayne Minshall Christopher T. Robinson January 2001 Peter Landres Abstract Davis, Jeffrey C.; Minshall, G. Wayne; Robinson, Christopher T.; Landres, Peter. 2001. Monitoring wilderness stream ecosystems. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-70. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 137 p. A protocol and methods for monitoring the major physical, chemical, and biological components of stream ecosystems are presented. The monitor- ing protocol is organized into four stages. At stage 1 information is obtained on a basic set of parameters that describe stream ecosystems. Each following stage builds upon stage 1 by increasing the number of parameters and the detail and frequency of the measurements. Stage 4 supplements analyses of stream biotic structure with measurements of stream function: carbon and nutrient processes. Standard methods are presented that were selected or modified through extensive field applica- tion for use in remote settings. Keywords: bioassessment, methods, sampling, macroinvertebrates, production The Authors emphasize aquatic benthic inverte- brates, community dynamics, and Jeffrey C. Davis is an aquatic ecolo- stream ecosystem structure and func- gist currently working in Coastal Man- tion. For the past 19 years he has agement for the State of Alaska. He been conducting research on the received his B.S. from the University long-term effects of wildfires on of Alaska, Anchorage, and his M.S. stream ecosystems. He has authored from Idaho State University. His re- over 100 peer-reviewed journal ar- search has focused on nutrient dy- ticles and 85 technical reports.
    [Show full text]
  • 100 Characters
    40 Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation: Final Report Leon C. Hinz Jr. and James N. Zahniser Illinois Natural History Survey Prairie Research Institute University of Illinois 30 April 2015 INHS Technical Report 2015 (31) Prepared for: Illinois Department of Natural Resources State Wildlife Grant Program (Project Number T-88-R-001) Unrestricted: for immediate online release. Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign Brian D. Anderson, Interim Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Geoffrey A. Levin, Acting Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation. Project Number: T-88-R-001 Contractor information: University of Illinois at Urbana/Champaign Institute of Natural Resource Sustainability Illinois Natural History Survey 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 Project Period: 1 October 2013—31 September 2014 Principle Investigator: Leon C. Hinz Jr., Ph.D. Stream Ecologist Illinois Natural History Survey One Natural Resources Way, Springfield, IL 62702-1271 217-785-8297 [email protected] Prepared by: Leon C. Hinz Jr. & James N. Zahniser Goals/ Objectives: (1) Review all SGNC listing criteria for currently listed non-mollusk invertebrate species using criteria in Illinois Wildlife Action Plan, (2) Assess current status of species populations, (3) Review criteria for additional species for potential listing as SGNC, (4) Assess stressors to species previously reviewed, (5) Complete draft updates and revisions of IWAP Appendix I and Appendix II for non-mollusk invertebrates. T-88 Final Report Project Title: Review and Update of Non-mollusk Invertebrate Species in Greatest Need of Conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Nature's Garbage Collectors
    R3 Nature’s Garbage Collectors You’ve already learned about producers, herbivores, carnivores and omnivores. Take a moment to think or share with a partner: what’s the difference between those types of organisms? You know about carnivores, which are animals that eat other animals. An example is the sea otter. You’ve also learned about herbivores, which only eat plants. Green sea turtles are herbivores. And you’re very familiar with omnivores, animals that eat both animals and plants. You are probably an omnivore! You might already know about producers, too, which make their food from the sun. Plants and algae are examples of producers. Have you ever wondered what happens to all the waste that everything creates? As humans, when we eat, we create waste, like chicken bones and banana peels. Garbage collectors take this waste to landfills. And after our bodies have taken all the energy and vitamins we need from food, we defecate (poop) the leftovers that we can’t use. Our sewerage systems take care of this waste. But what happens in nature? Sea otters and sea turtles don’t have landfills or toilets. Where does their waste go? There are actually organisms in nature that take care of these leftovers and poop. How? Instead of eating fresh animals or plants, these organisms consume waste to get their nutrients. There are three types of these natural garbage collectors -- scavengers, detritivores, and decomposers. You’ve probably already met (and maybe even eaten) a few of them. Scavengers Scavengers are animals that eat dead, decaying animals and plants.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera
    Review Diversity and Ecosystem Services of Trichoptera John C. Morse 1,*, Paul B. Frandsen 2,3, Wolfram Graf 4 and Jessica A. Thomas 5 1 Department of Plant & Environmental Sciences, Clemson University, E-143 Poole Agricultural Center, Clemson, SC 29634-0310, USA; [email protected] 2 Department of Plant & Wildlife Sciences, Brigham Young University, 701 E University Parkway Drive, Provo, UT 84602, USA; [email protected] 3 Data Science Lab, Smithsonian Institution, 600 Maryland Ave SW, Washington, D.C. 20024, USA 4 BOKU, Institute of Hydrobiology and Aquatic Ecology Management, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor Mendelstr. 33, A-1180 Vienna, Austria; [email protected] 5 Department of Biology, University of York, Wentworth Way, York Y010 5DD, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-864-656-5049 Received: 2 February 2019; Accepted: 12 April 2019; Published: 1 May 2019 Abstract: The holometabolous insect order Trichoptera (caddisflies) includes more known species than all of the other primarily aquatic orders of insects combined. They are distributed unevenly; with the greatest number and density occurring in the Oriental Biogeographic Region and the smallest in the East Palearctic. Ecosystem services provided by Trichoptera are also very diverse and include their essential roles in food webs, in biological monitoring of water quality, as food for fish and other predators (many of which are of human concern), and as engineers that stabilize gravel bed sediment. They are especially important in capturing and using a wide variety of nutrients in many forms, transforming them for use by other organisms in freshwaters and surrounding riparian areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Lipid Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Aquatic Insects
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Boyd Jay Hanson for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Fisheries presented on January 6, 1983 Title: Lipid Content and Fatty Acid Composition of Aquatic Insects: Dietary Influence and Aquatic Adaptation. Redacted for privacy Abstract approved: K.W. Cuins The effect of diet on the lipid content and fatty acid composition of aquatic insects was examined in a series of laboratory feeding experiments, through collection of species of various dietary types from natural populations, and through field introductions of insects into habitats with varying dietary resources. Dietary influences on growth and biochemical composition of the caddisfly Clistoronia magnifica were examined with a variety of diets including wheat, microbially conditioned alder leaves, and wheat plus alder. Larval growth of late instar C. magnifica was slower and resulting pupae were smaller and had less lipid on alder alone than on the diets with wheat. Increased temperature negatively affected the growth of insects on the itadequate alder diet, but not that of larvae receiving wheat. Biochemical analyses of foods and insects indicated that the higher growth rates of wheat-fed larvae resulted from the storage of lipids derived from the wheat. It appears that a source of carbohydrate for the synthesis of storage lipid is a major requirement for late instar C. magnifica. Lipid content and fatty acid composition was determined for representatives of 58 aquatic genera from 7 orders and 6 functional feeding groups. The majority of the insects had total lipid contents of 10% - 20% of total dry weight, and fatty acid compositions generally similar to those reported for related terrestrial species.
    [Show full text]