DOCSLIB.ORG

Eu-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT EU-ARMENIA PARLIAMENTARY COOPERATION COMMITTEE MINUTES of the TWELFTH MEETING 2-3 November 2011 Yerevan CONTENT 1. Welcome address by Mr Hovik ABRAHAMYAN, Chairman of the National 2 Assembly of the Republic of Armenia 2. Opening remarks by the Co-Chairs of the EU-Armenia PCC 2 3. Adoption of the draft agenda 3 4. Adoption of the minutes of the eleventh meeting of the EU-Armenia PCC held in Brussels on 1-2 December 2010 3 5. The state of play of relations between the EU and Armenia 3 - Political dialogue - Implementation of the ENP Action Plan - Negotiations on the EU-Armenia Association Agreement - Eastern Partnership - Mobility Partnership, Visa Facilitation and Readmission Agreements - DCFTA negotiations Statements by: - The Government of Armenia - The European Union 6. Political developments, reforms agenda in Armenia and EU-Armenia cooperation 5 - Political dialogue and last developments in Armenia - Reforms agenda in Armenia and EU-Armenia - The fight against corruption 7. Regional issues 9 - The Nagorno-Karabakh conflict - Regional cooperation and Armenia’s participation in the multilateral track of the Eastern Partnership - Armenia-Turkey relations 8. Follow-up of the Final Statement and Recommendations adopted at the eleventh meeting of the EU-Armenia PCC held in Brussels on 2-3 December 2010 9 9. Dialogue with representatives of the civil society 14 10. Adoption of the Final Statement and Recommendations 16 11. Any other business 16 12. Date and place of next meeting 16 ANNEX: List of participants ________________ PV\EN.doc 1 PE 495.735 The 12th EU- Armenia PCC under Co-Chairmanship of Mrs. Naira Zohrabyan and Mr. Milan Cabrnoch started at 15:20. Points 1, 2 of the Agenda Mrs. Naira Zohrabyan, welcoming the committee members announced the opening of the 12th meeting and yielded the floor to Mr. Hovik Abrahamyan, President of the National Assembly of Armenia. Mr. Hovik Abrahamyan, the President of the National Assembly welcomed the guests mentioning that the delegation of the European Parliament is for the first time in Yerevan after the elections and wished success in the forthcoming works of the committee. Mr. Abrahamyan mentioned that the committee composed of the members of the European Parliament and the Parliament of Armenia established twelve years ago with the purpose of political dialogue managed to contribute to the creation of the joint agenda for Armenia and European Union due to its consistent work. He further mentioned that the European direction and approximation with the European Union are one of the priorities for the internal and external policies of Armenia and its authorities focus their contribution on the importance of the issues included at the current stage of European Union – Armenia cooperation agenda. These issues are found in particular in the domains of external policy, democracy, economic integration, mobility, human rights and energy. Mr. Abrahamyan dwelled upon the negotiation process of the Association Agreement mentioning that the nineteen chapters have been negotiated and provisionally closed. The President of the National Assembly briefly introduced the legislative work performed during the year, particularly dwelling upon the “Electoral Code”, and the new law on the “Freedom of Assembly”. Speaking about the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, the President of the N.A. mentioned that this assembly is the parliamentary tool of the Eastern Partnership policy, which shall create the necessary conditions to bring forward the political association and economic integration between the European Union and Eastern partners. The Euronest shall not be able to fully perform its activities if instead of the issues concerning development of the regional cooperation only issues regarding conflicts are continuously brought forward. Mr. Abrahamyan also stated that the National Assembly of the Republic of Armenia was among the first that responded to the establishment of Euronest and that it promptly started activities necessary for this purpose. Mr. Abrahamyan concluded by expressing the hope that the meeting of the committee would be held in a constructive atmosphere and be marked by mutual understanding. Mr. Milan Cabrnoch, the co-chair of EU-Armenia parliamentary cooperation committee, welcomed the committee members. Mr Cabrnoch thanked for the friendly welcome and stressed the importance of the dialogue in parliamentary format. He pointed out that many of the people present also participated in the works of the Euronest Parliamentary Assembly, which was also an important platform for cooperation. Stressing the importance of the meeting, the Co-chair mentioned that the presence of a broad set of representatives of the political factions in the European Parliament (EP) proved the importance given to the mentioned relations. He expressed confidence that the outcome of this dialogue would serve as good grounds for deepening further cooperation. He pointed out that the EP delegation considered Armenia a part of Europe and that it would focus its contributions on the importance of the development of relations in all domains. Mr. Cabrnoch mentioned the Association Agreement, the creation of a Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area (DCFTA), visa ________________ PV\EN.doc 2 PE 495.735 facilitation and readmission, as well as the issues related to mobility of people, as topical issues. Discussions on these issues were at different stages of development. Conclusion and application of agreements would represent great progress in mutual relations. Mr Cabrnoch added that the Nagorno-Karabakh conflict would undoubtedly also be touched upon, stressing that the EP supports the Minsk group format of conflict regulation. The current status quo was no longer acceptable. Mr. Cabrnoch mentioned that the EU wished to intensify its efforts, without in any way calling into question the activity of the Minsk group. Mr Cabrnoch stressed that the EU would support free and fair conduct of the upcoming elections in Armenia, which would make their results accepted by the international society and the Armenian people. He considered that the atmosphere in the dialogue made it perfect for significantly bringing forward the relations. Mr. Cabrnoch pointed out that the bilateral relations should be made deeper to contribute to human rights, democracy and economic development for the beautiful country Armenia. Points 3, 4, 5 of the Agenda Mrs Naira Zohrabyan suggested the adoption of the draft Agenda for the meeting and of the minutes of the 11th EU-Armenia PCC meeting, held on 1-2 December in Brussels. Discussions followed the adoption of the documents. Mr. Zohrab Mnatsakanyan, Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs, emphasized the parliamentary platform of cooperation and dialogue, pointing out that quite positive dynamics is observed in this field. He briefly touched upon the joint activities and mutual visits during the last year. With regard to the political dialogue between Armenia and the European Union Mr. Mnatsakanyan stressed the importance of the comprehensive reforms, set out first of all in the strategy of the reforms undertaken by the President of Armenia. These reforms related to all spheres of the institutional establishment of Armenia, particularly to the democratic institutions and administration system and the trade and economic system. They also concerned the social area. With regard to the negotiations of an Association Agreement, Mr. Mnatsakanyan noted that this agreement would replace the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement and provide a new legal basis for the relations between Armenia and the European Union. Mr. Mnatsakanyan pointed out that the Association Agreement was a complicated document which would oblige the Armenian side to amend its legislation. He emphasized the interconnection between ongoing reforms in Armenia and the negotiations of the Association Agreement. He stated that the Armenian side was satisfied with the dynamics of negotiations and that the negotiations on 19 parts of the Agreement had already been concluded. The most topical issue was implementation of measures in Armenia related to the DCFTA. Mr Mnatsakanyan drew attention to the need for reforms inter alia in the phyto-sanitary, intellectual property and customs spheres. People-to-people contacts were the next important issue. Inter-governmental, as well as parliamentary cooperation displayed positive dynamics, though promotion of the cooperation between the societies. Bringing the societies closer to each other was extremely important. ________________ PV\EN.doc 3 PE 495.735 Mr. Mnatsakanyan also dwelled upon the progress in mutual relations and furtherance in these relations through financial tools. The National Indicative Programme for the EU's assistance, as well as macroeconomic tools worked. The maximum efficient use of financial tools was extremely important for Armenia, as it stimulated the pace of the reforms. Mr. Mnatsakanyan also dwelled upon the multilateral cooperation platform, emphasizing that relations had clearly shaped frames, for example, the Eastern Partnership. He pointed out that Armenia participated in the Warsaw summit. It focused its contribution on the importance of that platform which in its turn shaped the logic of the cooperation in the regional context. Mr. Mnatsakanyan affirmed that the European colleagues played a significant role for the atmosphere in regional cooperation. Expressing gratitude to the chair, Mr Onno Simons, Head of the political, economic, press and information
Recommended publications
  • Armenia Presidential Elections, 19 February 2008

    Armenia Presidential Elections, 19 February 2008

    EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT DELEGATION TO OBSERVE THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS IN THE REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA 19 February 2008 ELECTION OBSERVATION REPORT Mrs Marie Anne Isler Béguin, Chair of the Delegation Annexes: - EP press statement of 20 February 2008 - Joint press statement of 20 February 2008 - Joint statement on preliminary findings and conclusions of 20 February 2008 - Lists of participants - Programme DIRECTORATE-GENERAL FOR EXTERNAL POLICIES OF THE UNION _______________ 26 March 2008 TG/ES NT/716805EN.doc 1 PE 395.987 ARMENIA PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS 19 February 2008 A Delegation of four Members, led by Mrs Marie Anne ISLER BÉGUIN and composed of Mr Šarūnas BIRUTIS, Mrs Alexandra DOBOLYI and Mrs Gabriele STAUNER, stayed in Armenia from 17 to 21 February 2008 to observe the presidential elections on 19 February 2008. The Delegation organised its activities in close cooperation with other observing organisations on site. Some 75 parliamentarians and about 250 short-term observers monitored the election under the heading of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR), the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly (OSCE PA), the Council of Europe Parliamentary Assembly (PACE) and the European Parliament (EP). On 17 February, the Chair Mrs ISLER BÉGUIN had an exchange of views with the co-chair of the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee, Mr Avet ADONTS to be briefed from the Armenian side on the state of play with regard to the elections. The preparation of the joint parliamentary observation mission started with a working dinner with OSCE/ODHIHR Ambassadors STROHAL and AHRENS and the Head of the OSCE PA Delegation Mrs Anne- Marie LIZIN.
  • Meeting of States Parties Distr.: General 14 June 2017 English Original: English/French/Spanish

    Meeting of States Parties Distr.: General 14 June 2017 English Original: English/French/Spanish

    United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea SPLOS /INF/31 Meeting of States Parties Distr.: General 14 June 2017 English Original: English/French/Spanish my anam r Twenty-seventh Meeting New York, 12 to 16 June 2017 List of Delegations Liste de Délégations Lista de Delegaciones SPLOS/INF/31 Albania Representatives H.E. Mrs. Besiana Kadare, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative to the United Nations ( Chair of the delegation ) Mr. Arben Idrizi, Minister Counsellor, Permanent Mission Mrs. Ingrid Prizreni, First Secretary, Permanent Mission Algeria Representatives H.E. Mr. Sabri Boukadoum, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative to the United Nations ( Chair of the delegation ) H.E. Mr. Mohammed Bessedik, Ambassador, Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations Mr. Mehdi Remaoun, First Secretary, Permanent Mission Angola Representatives H.E. Mr. Ismael Gaspar Martins, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, Permanent Representative to the United Nations ( Chair of the delegation ) Vice-Admiral Martinho Francisco António, Technical Coordinator, Inter-Ministerial Commission of Delimitation and Maritime Demarcation of Angola Mrs. Anisabel Verissimo da Costa, Director of the International Exchange Directorate, Ministry of Justice and Human Rights Mrs. Claudete de Sousa, Director, Legal Office of the Ministry of Fisheries Mr. Marió Von Haff, Head, United Nations Department, Multilateral Affairs Directorate, Ministry of External Relations Col. Mário Simão, Military Counsellor, Permanent Mission Mr. Miguel Dialamicua, Counsellor, Permanent Mission Mrs. Vezua Paiva, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission Eng. José Januário da Conceição, Expert, Geographic and Cartographic Institute of Angola Eng. Lúmen Sebastião, Sonangol Expert Eng. Domingos de Carvalho Viana Moreira, Expert, Inter-Ministerial Commission of Delimitation and Maritime Demarcation Mr.
  • The Outcome of the Second Karabakh War: Confrontation Between the Diaspora and the Armenian Government

    The Outcome of the Second Karabakh War: Confrontation Between the Diaspora and the Armenian Government

    APRIL-2021 ANALYSIS THE OUTCOME OF THE SECOND KARABAKH WAR: CONFRONTATION BETWEEN THE DIASPORA AND THE ARMENIAN GOVERNMENT The trilateral agreement signed by the heads of state of Azerbaijan, Russia and Armenia on November 10, 2020 caused a growing discontent both among the citizens of Armenia and among representatives of the diaspora. The Armenian people were divided into several camps: those accusing the West of inaction; those accusing Russia of betrayal; and, finally, those accusing the current government of both betrayal and unpreparedness for military action. It should be noted that diaspora organizations did not openly criticize Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan in their statements at first, blaming Azerbaijan and its ally Turkey for everything. One of the first to speak out against the current administration was the Union of Armenians of Russia (UAR), led by its chairman Ara Abramyan. The situation was further aggravated by the spread of unfounded information about the government misappropriating the funds raised by the Hayastan Foundation during the war. As a result, representatives of the diaspora began to demand the resignation of the present administration. As noted above, one of the first large diaspora organizations to blame the current Armenian government was the Union of Armenians of Russia. Immediately after the signing of said agreement, the UAR held an online meeting of 50 heads of its regional offices, led by its chairman A. Abramyan[1], and on November 11, the organization issued a statement on behalf of the chairman, accusing Prime Minister Pashinyan of “incapacity and inability to run the country effectively.”[2] Russian businessman of Armenian origin Samvel Karapetyan, as well as entrepreneurs Artak Tovmasyan and Ruben Vardanyan, also joined these appeals.
  • Proposal for EP Reaction to Armenian Draft Received by the EP on 19

    Proposal for EP Reaction to Armenian Draft Received by the EP on 19

    EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee TWELFTH MEETING 2-3 November 2011 Yerevan Final Statement and Recommendations pursuant to Article 83 of the Partnership and Cooperation Agreement Under the co-chairmanship of Mr Milan CABRNOCH (European Conservatives and Reformists Group) and Mrs Naira ZOHRABYAN (Prosperous Armenia Party), the twelfth meeting of the EU-Armenia Parliamentary Cooperation Committee was held in Yerevan on 2-3 November 2011. The Committee exchanged views with Deputy Foreign Minister, Mr Zohrab MNATSAKANYAN, representing the Government of the Republic of Armenia and Mr Onno SIMONS, Head of the Political, Economic, Press and Information Section of the EU Delegation to Armenia, representing the European Union. The Parliamentary Cooperation Committee 1. welcomes the intensification of Armenia-EU relations over the last years and the opening of ambitious perspectives for cooperation in the political, economic, cultural and other fields; 2. salutes President Sargsyan's declaration of 18 December 2010 on the need for persistent adaptation to European standards in all areas of Armenia's political, social and economic and social lives, with no exemptions or reservations; 3. recognises that this presupposes inter alia significant acceleration of Armenia's implementation of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) Action Plan, in particular in relation to judicial independence, reform of the police and media pluralism, major concrete results in the fight against corruption, as well as parliamentary and presidential elections,
  • Armenia Bilateral Relations

    Armenia Bilateral Relations

    India- Armenia Bilateral Relations Background India recognized the independent Republic of Armenia on December 26, 1991, and India's Ambassador in Moscow was concurrently accredited to Armenia. From September 1992, India's Ambassador in Kiev (Ukraine) was given the concurrent charge of Armenia. India opened its Resident Mission in Yerevan at the level of Charge d' Affaires on 01 March 1999; the first Resident Ambassador Shri Bal Anand assumed charge in Yerevan in October 1999. Armenia, which had opened its Honorary Consulate in April 1994, established its Embassy in New Delhi in October 1999 at the level of Charge d' Affaires, followed by the arrival of the first Resident Ambassador Armen Baibourtian in May 2000. Historical background: Historians have suggested that when Assyrian warrior queen Semiramis invaded India in 2000 BC, some Armenians accompanied her as they probably did Alexander the Great in 326 BC. According to literary evidence, there were Indian settlements in Armenia established by two Indian Princes (Krishna and Ganesh escaping from Kannauj) who along with their families and large retinue had arrived in Armenia as early as 149 BC and were allotted land in Taron region (now in Turkey) by the then rulers of Armenia. Thomas Cana is said to be the first Armenian to have landed on the Malabar Coast in 780 AD. The first guidebook to Indian cities in Armenian was written in the 12th century. By middle ages, the Armenian towns of Artashat, Metsbin and Dvin had become important centers for barter with India which exported precious stones, herbs and stones to Armenia and imported hides and dyes.
  • Table of Contents

    Table of Contents

    Table of Contents 1. Social Economic Background & Current Indicators of Syunik Region...........................2 2. Key Problems & Constraints .............................................................................................23 Objective Problems ...................................................................................................................23 Subjective Problems..................................................................................................................28 3. Assessment of Economic Resources & Potential ..............................................................32 Hydropower Generation............................................................................................................32 Tourism .....................................................................................................................................35 Electronics & Engineering ........................................................................................................44 Agriculture & Food Processing.................................................................................................47 Mineral Resources (other than copper & molybdenum)...........................................................52 Textiles......................................................................................................................................55 Infrastructures............................................................................................................................57
  • "From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia

    "From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia

    UC Berkeley Recent Work Title From Ter-Petrosian to Kocharian: Leadership Change in Armenia Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/0c2794v4 Author Astourian, Stephan H. Publication Date 2000 eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California University of California, Berkeley FROM TER-PETROSIAN TO KOCHARIAN: LEADERSHIP CHANGE IN ARMENIA Stephan H. Astourian Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies Working Paper Series This PDF document preserves the page numbering of the printed version for accuracy of citation. When viewed with Acrobat Reader, the printed page numbers will not correspond with the electronic numbering. The Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies (BPS) is a leading center for graduate training on the Soviet Union and its successor states in the United States. Founded in 1983 as part of a nationwide effort to reinvigorate the field, BPSs mission has been to train a new cohort of scholars and professionals in both cross-disciplinary social science methodology and theory as well as the history, languages, and cultures of the former Soviet Union; to carry out an innovative program of scholarly research and publication on the Soviet Union and its successor states; and to undertake an active public outreach program for the local community, other national and international academic centers, and the U.S. and other governments. Berkeley Program in Soviet and Post-Soviet Studies University of California, Berkeley Institute of Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 260 Stephens Hall #2304 Berkeley, California 94720-2304 Tel: (510) 643-6737 [email protected] http://socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/ FROM TER-PETROSIAN TO KOCHARIAN: LEADERSHIP CHANGE IN ARMENIA Stephan H.
  • Report of the President of the Osce Parliamentary Assembly

    Report of the President of the Osce Parliamentary Assembly

    REPORT OF THE PRESIDENT OF THE OSCE PARLIAMENTARY ASSEMBLY Mr. George Tsereteli Winter Meeting of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly VIENNA, 20-21 February 2020 Report of the President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly Dear colleagues and friends, Following my re-election as President of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly during our Luxembourg Annual Session, I have continued to be active on your behalf to promote our work with leaders from our national parliaments and partner institutions, affirm our role within the OSCE family, and highlight some key priorities, in particular conflict resolution. I appreciate your strong support and the valuable assistance and advice provided by the Secretariat in both Copenhagen and Vienna. This has been crucial to provide parliamentary responses to a broad OSCE agenda and aim to meet our most pressing challenges. Detailed information on my work as President is listed in this report. In addition to these primary activities, I have met on several occasions with Heads of OSCE institutions to improve co-ordination at headquarters and in the field and ensure that our activities complement each other. I have also met with numerous PA delegations on the margins of my travels to ensure that all voices are heard and reflected in the work of our Parliamentary Assembly. Finally, together with a small group of Members, the Bureau and the International Secretariat, we have continued to hold regular discussions to consider changes in the Assembly’s work, in order to make it more effective and more visible. I want to thank those parliaments that have hosted my visits, but also particularly applaud and thank OSCE staff.
  • 'Preparing Populations for Peace': Implications for Armenian-Azerbaijani Peacebuilding

    'Preparing Populations for Peace': Implications for Armenian-Azerbaijani Peacebuilding

    Discussion Paper July 2019 ‘Preparing populations for peace’: Implications for Armenian-Azerbaijani peacebuilding Logo using multiply on layers Logo drawn as seperate elements with overlaps coloured seperately Cover photo: Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and President Ilham Aliyev. © Press Service of the Armenian Government Participants at a discussion at the Stepanakert Press Club, Nagorny Karabakh © Gegham Bagdasaryan Introduction In May 2019, Conciliation Resources convened a meeting of the Karabakh Contact Group (KCG) to In January 2019, after a meeting of Azerbaijani and discuss the implications of ‘preparing populations Armenian Foreign Ministers Elmar Mammadyarov for peace’ for peacebuilding across the conflict and Zohrab Mnatsakanyan in Paris, the co-Chairs today. Supported by the European Union (EU), of the Organization for Security and Co-operation the KCG is a platform engaging in open-ended in Europe’s (OSCE) Minsk Group announced that dialogue and joint analysis on key policy issues. the foreign ministers had agreed on the necessity This meeting brought together civil society of ‘preparing their populations for peace’. The activists from Armenia, Azerbaijan and Nagorny statement followed measures that had defused the Karabakh, and international experts. This short brief considerable tensions of recent years along the Line summarizes the discussions. It identifies a number of Contact in the Nagorny Karabakh conflict zone, of salient obstacles confronting the reinforcement as well as the Armenian-Azerbaijani international of peacebuilding efforts today and also a menu of border. These included a sustained reduction in policy options for addressing them. the number of ceasefire violations since 2017, and the establishment of ‘operative channels’ between the armed forces deployed along the Line What does ‘preparing populations for of Contact and the executive structures of Armenia peace’ mean? and Azerbaijan.
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia

    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
  • Galstyan Iom15years in Armenia.Pdf

    Galstyan Iom15years in Armenia.Pdf

    15 YEARS IN ARMENIA: MANAGING MIGRATION FOR THE BENEFIT OF ALL YEREVAN - 2008 the migration agency ARMENIA About the International Organization for Migration The International Organization for Migration (IOM) is an inter-governmental organization with 125 Member States and 16 Observer States (July 2008). Established in 1951, IOM has become the principal intergovernmental organization in the field of migration. After half a century of worldwide operational experience the Organization has assisted over 11 million migrants. Prepared by Kristina Galstyan IOM's structure is highly decentralized and service-oriented. Design by Nelly Margaryan Headquartered in Geneva, Switzerland, IOM currently operates in over 400 offices worldwide, managing more than 1,770 projects. Prepared for publication by the IOM Project Development and Implementation Unit in Armenia IOM has 5,600 operational staff and a programme budget of over US$ 783.8 million. IOM is committed to the principle that human and orderly Publisher: International Organization for Migration migration benefits migrants and society. IOM works closely with governmental, intergovernmental and non-governmental partners, as © Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be well as the research community and the private sector, to help ensure reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any the orderly and humane management of migration, to promote means of electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise international cooperation on migration issues, to assist in the search without the prior written permission of the author and publisher. for practical solutions to migration problems and to provide humanitarian assistance to migrants in need, be they refugees, displaced persons or other uprooted people.
  • Weighing the Reopening of Armenia's Unstable Nuclear Power Plant and the Duties of the International Community

    Weighing the Reopening of Armenia's Unstable Nuclear Power Plant and the Duties of the International Community

    Volume 5 Issue 1 Article 7 1994 Medzamor: Weighing the Reopening of Armenia's Unstable Nuclear Power Plant and the Duties of the International Community Tamara C. Gureghian Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj Part of the Energy and Utilities Law Commons, and the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Tamara C. Gureghian, Medzamor: Weighing the Reopening of Armenia's Unstable Nuclear Power Plant and the Duties of the International Community, 5 Vill. Envtl. L.J. 163 (1994). Available at: https://digitalcommons.law.villanova.edu/elj/vol5/iss1/7 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Villanova Environmental Law Journal by an authorized editor of Villanova University Charles Widger School of Law Digital Repository. Gureghian: Medzamor: Weighing the Reopening of Armenia's Unstable Nuclear Po 1994] MEDZAMOR: WEIGHING THE REOPENING OF ARMENIA'S UNSTABLE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT AND THE DUTIES OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY I. Introduction .......................................... 163 II. The Roots of Armenia's Environmental Problems: The Soviet Beginning .................... ................ 166 A. Soviet Environmental Development ............... 166 B. The Soviet Republics ............................. 173 C. Armenia's Environmental Crisis ................... 174 1. Medzamor: A History of a Troubled Nuclear Power Plant ................................... 175 2. Specific Environmental Problems .............. 178 III. Armenia's Energy and Economic Crises ............... 180 A. A Way Out: Medzamor ........................... 183 B. Possible Alternatives to Reopening Medzamor ..... 184 IV. International Environmental Law ..................... 188 A. International Duties Regarding Nuclear Developm ents .................................... 188 B. Developing Countries ............................. 195 C. Suggested Improvements to International Environmental Regulation .......................