DOCSLIB.ORG

Management Plan of Kemeri National Park 2002-2010

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Management Plan of Kemeri National Park 2002-2010 MANAGEMENT PLAN OF KEMERI NATIONAL PARK 2002-2010 This Management Plan begins with a long-term view of Kemeri National Park, looking beyond the eight year time horizon of this Plan. It offers a vision of the future that all can share and work together to strive towards. Vision of Kemeri National Park The territory of Kemeri National Park (NP) is characterised by a large diversity of ecosystems, species and habitats. The representative coastal landscape has old pine forests and non-built up dunes, inland there are shallow lagoon lakes with clean, clear water and large colonies of breeding birds that are able to feed and rest without the risk of being hunted. Varied broadleaf forests with the natural density of dead trees provide ideal conditions for rare lichens, fungi, plants, invertebrates and birds (including every woodpecker species recorded in Latvia). Raised bogs are an open landscape of pools and moss interrupted by islands of mineral soil. Natural meadows provide habitat for corncrakes, great snipes and other birds. The agricultural lands within the park territory are being managed using environmentally friendly methods. People visit the National Park both on foot and by bicycles, using the network of trails. There is also the possibility to watch birds and other wildlife, to go fishing, boating and to enjoy both present-day and ancient curative methods using the locally available sulphurous mineral water and medical mud and to get detailed information about the territory of the park and nature protection. Nature tourism is developed by encouraging locals, businessmen and municipalities to offer quality services and varied relaxation possibilities aiming to ensure the economical stability of the territory by giving extra income both to the budget of the National Park Administration and to local people. Timber is produced in the National Park in a way that imitates the natural processes and increases the biological diversity of the forest. 2 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................................................. 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................................... 7 1 THE “LEGAL OBLIGATIONS” OF KEMERI NP .................................................................................... 12 1.1 INTERNATIONAL OBLIGATIONS ............................................................................................................. 12 1.2 NORMATIVE ACTS OF LATVIA’S LEGISLATION ..................................................................................... 12 1.3 THE HISTORY OF THE PROTECTION OF THE TERRITORY ......................................................................... 18 2 COORDINATION OF NATURE PROTECTION INTERESTS OF KEMERI NP AND TERRITORY DEVELOPMENT PLANS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS .......................................................................... 20 2.1 PARTICIPATION OF PROTECTED TERRITORIES IN THE PROCESS OF SPATIAL PLANNING....................... 20 2.2 SPATIAL PLANS OF LOCAL GOVERNMENTS........................................................................................... 20 2.3 SPECIALLY SUPPORTABLE REGIONS...................................................................................................... 26 3 GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TERRITORY.......................................................................................... 27 3.1 GENERAL INFORMATION........................................................................................................................ 27 3.2 PHYSICAL AND GEOGRAPHICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE TERRITORY........................................................ 32 3.3 BIOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION..................................................................................................................... 41 3.4 SOCIO-ECONOMICAL DESCRIPTION ........................................................................................................ 51 3.5 CULTURAL HERITAGE OF THE TERRITORY ............................................................................................. 54 3.6 THE USE OF NATURAL RESOURCES ........................................................................................................ 57 3.7 OBJECTIVES FOR PROTECTION OF KEMERI NP ...................................................................................... 60 4 NATURE VALUES OF KEMERI NATIONAL PARK, THE OBJECTIVES AND ACTIVITIES FOR THEIR PRESERVATION .............................................................................................................................. 61 4.1 LAKES .................................................................................................................................................... 61 4.2 RIVERS ................................................................................................................................................... 81 4.3 SEASHORE .............................................................................................................................................. 85 4.4 SWAMPS ................................................................................................................................................. 89 4.5 FORESTS AND BUSHES.......................................................................................................................... 101 4.6 MEADOWS............................................................................................................................................ 110 4.7 SPECIES CONSERVATION ...................................................................................................................... 119 4.8 MAMMALS, REPTILES, AND AMPHIBIANS............................................................................................ 130 4.9 BIRD SPECIES THAT REQUIRE SPECIAL CONSERVATION MEASURES .................................................... 136 4.10 GEOLOGICAL NATURE VALUES .......................................................................................................... 140 5 LANDSCAPES OF KEMERI NP.............................................................................................................. 142 5.1 LANDSCAPE PROTECTION AND PLANING POLICY................................................................................. 142 5.2 DESCRIPTION OF LANDSCAPES OF KEMERI NP.................................................................................... 143 5.3 LANDSCAPE VALUES, OBJECTIVES AND PROTECTION ACTIVITIES IN KEMERI NP ............................... 144 6 FOREST MANAGEMENT ....................................................................................................................... 153 6.1 THE POLICY OF FOREST MANAGEMENT IN KEMERI NATIONAL PARK................................................ 153 6.2 THE AIMS OF FOREST MANAGEMENT IN KEMERI NP ......................................................................... 153 6.3 THE METHODS OF FOREST MANAGEMENT DEPENDING ON THE MANAGEMENT CATEGORY ................ 153 6.4 FOREST CUTTING ESTIMATE................................................................................................................. 157 6.5 ACTIVITIES........................................................................................................................................... 158 7 PUBLIC RELATIONS............................................................................................................................... 160 7.1 BASIC PRINCIPLES OF KNP PUBLIC RELATIONS ................................................................................. 160 7.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE SITUATION ......................................................................................................... 160 7.3 EVALUATION........................................................................................................................................ 161 7.4 INFLUENCING FACTORS........................................................................................................................ 161 7.5 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................................... 161 7.6 ACTIVITIES........................................................................................................................................... 161 7.7 INDICATORS OF ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................. 163 3 7.8 MONITORING........................................................................................................................................ 163 8 DEVELOPMENT OF TOURISM.............................................................................................................. 164 8.1 POLICY ................................................................................................................................................. 164 8.2 TOURISM RESOURCES IN KEMERI NP .................................................................................................. 164 8.3 INFORMATION AND IT'S ACCESSIBILITY............................................................................................... 167 8.4 VISITATION .......................................................................................................................................... 167 8.5 CAPACITY AND LIMITS OF THE
Load more

Recommended publications
  • "National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary."
    Intro 1996 National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands The Fish and Wildlife Service has prepared a National List of Vascular Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1996 National Summary (1996 National List). The 1996 National List is a draft revision of the National List of Plant Species That Occur in Wetlands: 1988 National Summary (Reed 1988) (1988 National List). The 1996 National List is provided to encourage additional public review and comments on the draft regional wetland indicator assignments. The 1996 National List reflects a significant amount of new information that has become available since 1988 on the wetland affinity of vascular plants. This new information has resulted from the extensive use of the 1988 National List in the field by individuals involved in wetland and other resource inventories, wetland identification and delineation, and wetland research. Interim Regional Interagency Review Panel (Regional Panel) changes in indicator status as well as additions and deletions to the 1988 National List were documented in Regional supplements. The National List was originally developed as an appendix to the Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al.1979) to aid in the consistent application of this classification system for wetlands in the field.. The 1996 National List also was developed to aid in determining the presence of hydrophytic vegetation in the Clean Water Act Section 404 wetland regulatory program and in the implementation of the swampbuster provisions of the Food Security Act. While not required by law or regulation, the Fish and Wildlife Service is making the 1996 National List available for review and comment.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE
    Guide to the Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- LILIACEAE LILIACEAE de Jussieu 1789 (Lily Family) (also see AGAVACEAE, ALLIACEAE, ALSTROEMERIACEAE, AMARYLLIDACEAE, ASPARAGACEAE, COLCHICACEAE, HEMEROCALLIDACEAE, HOSTACEAE, HYACINTHACEAE, HYPOXIDACEAE, MELANTHIACEAE, NARTHECIACEAE, RUSCACEAE, SMILACACEAE, THEMIDACEAE, TOFIELDIACEAE) As here interpreted narrowly, the Liliaceae constitutes about 11 genera and 550 species, of the Northern Hemisphere. There has been much recent investigation and re-interpretation of evidence regarding the upper-level taxonomy of the Liliales, with strong suggestions that the broad Liliaceae recognized by Cronquist (1981) is artificial and polyphyletic. Cronquist (1993) himself concurs, at least to a degree: "we still await a comprehensive reorganization of the lilies into several families more comparable to other recognized families of angiosperms." Dahlgren & Clifford (1982) and Dahlgren, Clifford, & Yeo (1985) synthesized an early phase in the modern revolution of monocot taxonomy. Since then, additional research, especially molecular (Duvall et al. 1993, Chase et al. 1993, Bogler & Simpson 1995, and many others), has strongly validated the general lines (and many details) of Dahlgren's arrangement. The most recent synthesis (Kubitzki 1998a) is followed as the basis for familial and generic taxonomy of the lilies and their relatives (see summary below). References: Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998, 2003); Tamura in Kubitzki (1998a). Our “liliaceous” genera (members of orders placed in the Lilianae) are therefore divided as shown below, largely following Kubitzki (1998a) and some more recent molecular analyses. ALISMATALES TOFIELDIACEAE: Pleea, Tofieldia. LILIALES ALSTROEMERIACEAE: Alstroemeria COLCHICACEAE: Colchicum, Uvularia. LILIACEAE: Clintonia, Erythronium, Lilium, Medeola, Prosartes, Streptopus, Tricyrtis, Tulipa. MELANTHIACEAE: Amianthium, Anticlea, Chamaelirium, Helonias, Melanthium, Schoenocaulon, Stenanthium, Veratrum, Toxicoscordion, Trillium, Xerophyllum, Zigadenus.
    [Show full text]
  • Orchids Orchids Are the Lady’S Slippers, So Named and Lake Huron
    By Tom Shields Photos by Kevin Tipson and Henry Glowka unless otherwise indicated jewels of the Biosphere res The Niagara Escarpment is justly famous as a uNESCo World Biosphere Reserve, one of Canada’s first. In Southern ontario, its tower - ing dolostone cliffs, formed in ancient seas more than 420 million years ago, rise dramatically along a jagged line that stretches 725 kilo - metres from the Niagara River to the tip of Tobermory. From these heights the Escarpment tilts down gently to the west. Rainfall and ground water seep gradually through its porous rocks, creating swamps, fens, bogs, marshes, valleys, caves, and microcli - mates across the meandering band that follows its length. 28 BRuCE TRAIL MAGAzINE SPRING 201 4 erve d n a l c A e c n e r u a L : o t o h P WWW.BRuCETRAIL.oRG BRuCE TRAIL MAGAzINE 29 Nowhere are these features more promi - LADY’S SLIPPERS (CYPRIPEDIUM) nent than in the Bruce Peninsula, Easiest to find and most familiar of our enrobed on either side by Georgian Bay distinguishing orchids orchids are the lady’s slippers, so named and Lake Huron. Here, jewel-like mem - All orchids have a highly modified, due to the fancied resemblance of their bers of one of the Escarpment’s other pouched lip to an old-fashioned slipper lavish petal called the lip. usually it claims to fame grow with an abundance or moccasin. The flowers are often large is held at the bottom of the flower, and diversity thought unequalled else - and showy. Four of the nine species but sometimes at the top.
    [Show full text]
  • Dietary Analysis of Piraino 1, Sicily, Italy: the Role of Archaeopalynology in Forensic Science
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Papers in Natural Resources Natural Resources, School of 2012 Dietary analysis of Piraino 1, Sicily, Italy: The oler of archaeopalynology in forensic science Dario Piombino-Mascali Institute for Mummies and the Iceman Albert R. Zink Institute for Mummies and the Iceman Karl J. Reinhard University of Nebraska at Lincoln, [email protected] Melissa Lein University of Nebraska-Lincoln Stephanie Panzer Department of Radiology, Trauma Center Murnau See next page for additional authors Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers Piombino-Mascali, Dario; Zink, Albert R.; Reinhard, Karl J.; Lein, Melissa; Panzer, Stephanie; Aufderheide, Arthur C.; Rachid, Rachel; De Souza, Wanderley; Araujo, Adauto; Chavez, Sergio A.M.; LeRoy-Toren, Sara; Teixeira-Santos, Isabel; and Dutra, Juliana M. F., "Dietary analysis of Piraino 1, Sicily, Italy: The or le of archaeopalynology in forensic science" (2012). Papers in Natural Resources. 480. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/480 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resources, School of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Papers in Natural Resources by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Authors Dario Piombino-Mascali, Albert R. Zink, Karl J. Reinhard, Melissa Lein, Stephanie Panzer, Arthur C. Aufderheide, Rachel Rachid, Wanderley De Souza, Adauto Araujo, Sergio A.M. Chavez, Sara LeRoy-Toren, Isabel Teixeira-Santos, and Juliana M. F. Dutra This article is available at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln: http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/natrespapers/480 Published in Journal of Archaeological Science 40:4 (April 2013), pp.
    [Show full text]
  • Jūrmalas Pilsētas Domes Tūrismu Veicinoši Pasākumi Tūrisma Statistika Sadalījums Pa Valstīm Baltijas Valstu Tūristu Skaita Salīdzinājums 2012.–2015
    Jūrmalas pilsētas domes tūrismu veicinoši pasākumi Tūrisma statistika Sadalījums pa valstīm Baltijas valstu tūristu skaita salīdzinājums 2012.–2015. gads NVS valstu tūristu skaita salīdzinājums 2012.–2015. gads Skandināvijas valstu un Vācijas tūristu skaita salīdzinājums 2012.–2015. gads Igaunija •Izstāde Tourest TAVA stendā/ 13.-15. februāris •Brošūra «Jūrmala 2015» igauņu valodā •Reklāmas lapa A4 Postimees laikrakstā/ 14. marts •Reklāmraksts Postimees pielikumā «Aktīvā atpūta Latvijā»/ maijs •Igaunijas glancēto sieviešu un vīriešu žurnālu pārstāvju uzņemšana/ maijs •Igaunijas TV uzņemšana Jūrmalā/ 12.-16. jūnijs •Reklāmas lapa A4 Postimees laikrakstā/ rudens •Newspaper Postimees (Igaunijā) •Žurnāls HELLO (Igaunijā) •Žurnāls ARTER (Igaunijā) •Supplement Puhkus Latis (Igaunijā) Newspaper Postimees Külastage meid Tallinn Tartu Pärnu Riga Vilnius Meil on hea meel tervitada iga külalist ja me kutsume kõiki avastama Jūrmalat kogu selle mitmekesisuses: tutvuma ajaloo, rikka kultuurielu ja eri puhkevõimalustega; nautima merd, tuult, Tere tulemast päikest ja loodust. Jūrmala on kohtumispaik, koht, kust leida inspiratsiooni ja kuhu on ikka ja jälle hea tagasi tulla. Tere tulemast meie Jūrmalasse! külalislahkesse linna! Vaatetorn ja pere kurada, Putukarada, Männirada ja Taime- Rand rabarada. Pärast suuri rekonstrueerimis- rada. Radade juurde on rajatud avarad töid avati taas Kemeri raba laudtee, millel puhkepark Dzintari’s www.tourism.jurmala.lv vaateplatvormid, turvalised ja mugavad saab nüüd teha imelise jalutuskäigu puu- Rand on varustatud riietuskabiinide
    [Show full text]
  • Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species
    Hind ile Scientific Volume 2018, Article ID 7958689, 18 pages https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/7958689 Hindawi Review Article Conservation Status of the Family Orchidaceae in Spain Based on European, National, and Regional Catalogues of Protected Species Daniel de la Torre Llorente© Biotechnology-Plant Biology Department, Higher Technical School of Agronomic, Food and Biosystems Engineering, Universidad Politecnica de Madrid, 28140 Madrid, Spain Correspondence should be addressed to Daniel de la Torre Llorente; [email protected] Received 22 June 2017; Accepted 28 December 2017; Published 30 January 2018 Academic Editor: Antonio Amorim Copyright © 2018 Daniel de la Torre Llorente. Tis is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Tis report reviews the European, National, and Regional catalogues of protected species, focusing specifcally on the Orchidaceae family to determine which species seem to be well-protected and where they are protected. Moreover, this examination highlights which species appear to be underprotected and therefore need to be included in some catalogues of protection or be catalogued under some category of protection. Te national and regional catalogues that should be implemented are shown, as well as what species should be included within them. Tis report should be a helpful guideline for environmental policies about orchids conservation in Spain, at least at the regional and national level. Around 76% of the Spanish orchid fora are listed with any fgure of protection or included in any red list, either nationally (about 12-17%) or regionally (72%).
    [Show full text]
  • Protected Areas and Opportunities for Ecotourism in Latvia
    Protected areas and opportunities for ecotourism in Latvia Valdis Pilâts Gauja National Park, Baznîcas iela 3, Sigulda, LV-2150, Latvia [email protected] Introduction In Latvia similarly to elsewhere, nature based tourism and nature protection have clo- sely evolved. For instance, Gauja River valley with sandstone outcrops became a fa- mous destination place for travellers already at the beginning of the 19th century. German travellers who compared it to the Elba in Saxony and to the “Switzerland of Saxony” called it the “Switzerland of Livland”. In 1920s the first three areas of Gauja valley obtained the status of protected areas, and in 1930s a National Park of 375 ha was created there. During the first period of independence in the first half of 20th century Latvia had a powerful tourism industry. Income from tourism was almost twice the income from our main export product - bacon. Already in the 1930’s tourism was regar- ded as an essential component of regional development, which succeeded in stimula- ting economic development, maintaining the traditional rural landscape and also play- ing a role in public education about history and nature. Unfortunately, during the mid 1900’s Latvia was once again embroiled in war, and incorporated in the Soviet Union. As a result it was isolated behind the “iron curtain” and therefore still is a “blank spot “ on today’s European and World tourist maps. Nowadays Latvia similarly to other Eastern European States in post-communist transition period is looking for new ways to strengthen national economy. Tourism is one of the areas with greatest potential for development.
    [Show full text]
  • Latvijas Universitātes Zinātniskie Raksti Acta Universitatis Latviensis
    ISSN 1407-2157 Latvijas Universitātes Zinātniskie Raksti Acta Universitatis Latviensis 613 LATVIJAS PURVU VEĢETĀCIJAS KLASIFIKĀCIJA UN DINAMIKA Latvijas Universitāte Latvijas purvu veģetācijas klasifikācija un dinamika Zinātniskie raksti 613. sējums Rīga 1998 -) / Latvijas punu veģetācijas klasifikācija un dinamika: Zinātniskie raksti/Redkolēģija: V.Kreile, M.Laiviņš, A.Namatēva. Rīga: LU, 1998. 92 Ipp. Rakstu krājumā apkopoti pēdējo gadu Latvijas purvu un ezeru krastu veģetācijas pētījumu rezultāti. Analizēti Teicu purva veidošanās apstākļi pēc putekšņu diagrammām. Publicētas purvu augu sabiedrību sintaksonomijas shēmas un sinoptiskās tabulas. Pētījumu rezultātus var izmantot bioloģijas un ģeogrāfijas studenti un citi interesenti. Redakcijas kolēģija: Vija Kreile, Māris Laiviņš, Anita Namatēva © Teicu valsts rezervāts, 1998 PRIEKŠVĀRDS 1997.gada 20.-21.oktobri Teicu rezervātā notika seminārs "Purvu veģetācijas klasifikācija, kartēšana un aizsardzība Latvijā", kurā piedalījās Latvijas Universitātes Bioloģijas un Ģeogrāfijas un Zemes zinātņu fakultāšu, Valsts Ģeoloģijas dienesta, Latvijas Valsts Mežzinātnes institūta "Silava" un Teicu valsts rezervāta speciālisti. Latvijas lielākajā purvu masīvā Teicos notika ekspedīcijas semināra dalībnieku iepazīstināšanai ar sūnu purvu ciņu un lāmu, pārejas un zāļu purvu, ezeru aizaugšanas joslu un palienes pļavu veģetāciju 2 maršrutos: Stiebriņi Kurtavas ezers Šūmāna ezers un Silagals Tolkajas ezers Siksala Islienas ezers. Seminārā tika nolasīti 8 ziņojumi par purvu veģetācijas un floras pētījumiem dažādos Latvijas reģionos, demonstrētas kartes un sintaksonomijas shēmas. Šajā rakstu krājumā publicēti semināra materiāli. Semināra norisi un rakstu krājuma sagatavošanu atbalstīja LR Vides aizsardzības fonds un Teicu valsts rezervāts. SATURS M.Laiviņš. Latvijas ziedaugu un paparžaugu sabiedrību augstākie sintaksoni 7 M.Pakalne. Latvijas purvu veģetācijas raksturojums 23 A. Lācis, L.Kalniņa. Purvu uzbūve un attīstība Teicu valsts rezervātā 39 B.Bambe. Purvu veģetācijas dinamika Teicu rezervātā 56 S.Jermacāne.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridgeshire and Peterborough County Wildlife Sites
    Cambridgeshire and Peterborough County Wildlife Sites Selection Guidelines VERSION 6.2 April 2014 CAMBRIDGESHIRE & PETERBOROUGH COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES PANEL CAMBRIDGESHIRE & PETERBOROUGH COUNTY WILDLIFE SITES PANEL operates under the umbrella of the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Biodiversity Partnership. The panel includes suitably qualified and experienced representatives from The Wildlife Trust for Bedfordshire, Cambridgeshire, Northamptonshire; Natural England; The Environment Agency; Cambridgeshire County Council; Peterborough City Council; South Cambridgeshire District Council; Huntingdonshire District Council; East Cambridgeshire District Council; Fenland District Council; Cambridgeshire and Peterborough Environmental Records Centre and many amateur recorders and recording groups. Its aim is to agree the basis for site selection, reviewing and amending them as necessary based on the best available biological information concerning the county. © THE WILDLIFE TRUST FOR BEDFORDSHIRE, CAMBRIDGESHIRE AND NORTHAMPTONSHIRE 2014 © Appendices remain the copyright of their respective originators. All rights reserved. Without limiting the rights under copyright reserved above, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in any type of retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means (electronic, photocopying, mechanical, recording or otherwise) without the permission of the copyright owner. INTRODUCTION The Selection Criteria are substantially based on Guidelines for selection of biological SSSIs published by the Nature Conservancy Council (succeeded by English Nature) in 1989. Appropriate modifications have been made to accommodate the aim of selecting a lower tier of sites, i.e. those sites of county and regional rather than national importance. The initial draft has been altered to reflect the views of the numerous authorities consulted during the preparation of the Criteria and to incorporate the increased knowledge of the County's habitat resource gained by the Phase 1 Habitat Survey (1992-97) and other survey work in the past decade.
    [Show full text]
  • The Red Data List of Irish Plants
    The Red Data List of Irish Plants The risks that species face are each very different, however, as a guide to the susceptibility of a given species, an agreed set of categories has been established internationally, and these are used to determine the potential risk that a species could become extinct. These categories are:- CRITICALLY ENDANGERED or CR - Species that are declining at a fast rate, and face imminent risk of extinction. ENDANGERED or E - Species that are declining, or grow in habitats likely to be disturbed, 'developed' or facing an ongoing degradation. VULNERABLE or V - Species that are currently not endangered, but would be extremely vulnerable if their habitats are disturbed in the future. There are seven species of plant that require immediate intervention (CR) if we are to save them from joining the fate of 11 other species that are now known to be extinct in Ireland. A number of these are already extinct in the Republic, and are not therefore legally protected under the 1999 Flora Protection Act. In the list below, 188 species of plant are listed, of which 64 are flowering plants, 4 ferns, 14 mosses, 4 liverworts, 1 lichen and 2 algae. Protected=1999 Flora Protection Order; (protected)= formerly protected by 1987 Order; {protected}= formerly protected by 1980 Order; (NI)= protected in Northern Ireland only. EXTINCT (9) Pheasant's-eye Adonis annua -- Corncockle Agrostemma githago Cogal Corn Chamomile Anthemis arvensis Fíogadán goirt Purple Spurge Euphorbia peplis Spuirse dhearg Sea Stock Matthiola sinuata Tonóg chladaigh
    [Show full text]
  • Ministero Della Salute Direzione Generale Per L'igiene E La Sicurezza Degli Alimenti E La Nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma
    arsl_ge.alisa.REGISTRO UFFICIALE.I.0012225.25-06-2018 0026792-25/06/2018-DGISAN-MDS-P Trasmissione elettronica N. prot. DGISAN in Docsa/PEC Ministero della Salute Direzione generale per l'igiene e la sicurezza degli alimenti e la nutrizione Ufficio 2 Via Giorgio Ribotta 5- 00144Roma ASSESSORATI ALLA SANITA’ REGIONI E PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI TRENTO SERVIZI VETERINARI LORO SEDI ASSESSORATO ALL’AGRICOLTURA PROVINCIA AUTONOMA DI BOLZANO SEDE E p.c. ASSICA Pec: [email protected] UNICEB [email protected] [email protected] ASSOCARNI [email protected] FEDERCARNI [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI PARMA [email protected]; [email protected] [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO SAN DANIELE [email protected] CARPEGNA PROSCIUTTI S.p.A. [email protected] CONSORZIO DEL PROSCIUTTO DI MODENA [email protected] C.I.A. organizzazione @cia.it CNA [email protected] UNIONALIMENTARI [email protected] A.I.I.P.A. [email protected] CIM –CONSORZIO ITALIANO MACELLATORI Pec: [email protected] DGSAF Ufficio 1 SEDE OGETTO: Aggiornamenti sull’esportazioni di carne fresca suina, prodotti a base di carne suina e prodotti finiti contenti suino dall’ Italia verso la Federazione russa. Si fa seguito alle lettere di questo ufficio n° prot. 15196 del 12 aprile 2018 e N° prot. 10609 del 19 marzo 2018 concernenti l’oggetto per fornire ulteriori aggiornamenti giunti dalla Parte russa con le ultime linee guida Versione del 14/6/2018 e pervenuti per il tramite della Commissione europea, al fine di consentire una esatta compilazione della certificazione veterinaria che deve accompagnare le carni ed i prodotti del settore suino che sono esportati dall’Italia verso la Federazione Russa.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Plant List, Pdf Format
    Appendix A: City of Bellingham Native Plant List December 2020 The City of Bellingham Native Plant List (Figure 1) includes plant species that are native to Bellingham watersheds (Figure 2). The native plant list applies to all habitat types, including riparian, upland, and wetland areas. The list was developed using specimen records from the Consortium of Pacific Northwest Herbaria and Bellingham plant checklists curated by Don Knoke, a volunteer at the University of Washington Herbarium. To improve plant establishment and protect the genetic resources of our local plant populations, the City recommends using native plants that were grown from seeds or cuttings collected from the Puget Trough Ecoregion (Figure 3). Obtaining native plants grown from material collected from the Puget Trough Ecoregion will help ensure the plants are adapted to the unique environmental conditions of Bellingham watersheds and are genetically similar to our local plant populations. A more thorough discussion of the rational and selection process is provided in the City of Bellingham Public Works Department Native Plant Materials Selection Guidelines, December 2020. Figure 1. City of Bellingham Native Plant List Ferns Common Name Scientific Name Family Bracken fern Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens Dennstaedtiaceae Bristle-like quillwort Isoetes tenella Isoetaceae Common horsetail Equisetum arvense Equisetaceae Deer fern Struthiopteris spicant (Blechnum spicant) Blechnaceae Dream fern Aspidotis densa Pteridaceae Giant horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii
    [Show full text]