DOCSLIB.ORG

For a 24-Hour Public Sector General Strike

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
For a 24-Hour Public Sector General Strike the www.socialistparty.org.uk Socialist 24-30 March 2011 Issue 663 Price: 70p (Solidarity: £2) Libya: no to western intervention Build an independent movement of workers and youth! See page 2 FIGHT ALL CUTS FOR A 24-HOUR PUBLIC SECTOR GENERAL STRIKE Join the demonstration: Assemble 11am, 26 March, Victoria Embankment between Blackfriars and Waterloo bridges. Come to the National Shop Stewards Network anti-cuts campaign stage at Speakers’ Corner in Hyde Park from 2.30pm. Speakers include general secretary of the FBU, Matt Wrack, president of the RMT, Alex Gordon and president of the PCS, Janice Godrich. POPO BoxBox 24697,24697, LondonLondon E11E11 1YD1YD telephone:telephone: 020020 89888988 87778777 email:email:[email protected] [email protected] 2 NEWS www.socialistparty.org.uk 24-30 March 2011 the Socialist the Socialist what we think The paper of the Socialist Party. Issue 663. The Socialist, PO Box 24697, London E11 1YD Registered as a newspaper at the Post Office. Published by Socialist Publications, printed by Newsfax International. ISSN 1366-9621 Libya: no to western military intervention Build an independent movement of workers and youth! The UN Security Council’s majority decision to impose a ‘no- fly zone’, while greeted with joy on the streets of Benghazi and Tobruk, was in no way intended to defend the Libyan revolution. As Robert BEChert, from the Committee for a Workers’ International, writes, the air strikes’ growing civilian toll is leading to increasing questioning of these attacks. he longer this situation win support from the mass of the continues, the more ques- western population and rank and tioning and opposition will file soldiers while waging a revolu- develop. Already many are tionary war. This gave Gaddafi an Tdisgusted by the hypocrisy of gov- opportunity to regroup. ernments proclaiming their willing- The growth in support for a no- ness to defend Libyans while doing fly zone was a reversal of the senti- nothing when civilians are shot ment expressed in the English lan- down in Yemen or attacked in Gaza. guage posters put up in Benghazi in The western powers’ silence on February declaring “No to Foreign Saudi Arabian backing for the Bah- Intervention – Libyans can do it raini elite’s repression confirms, in by themselves!”. This followed the many people’s eyes, that what they wonderful examples of Tunisia and wish for in Libya is for that oil rich Egypt where sustained mass action country to also become a client completely undermined totalitarian state. regimes. Revolutionaries in Libya may think The Libyan opposition masses that this UN decision will help them, were confident that their momen- but they are mistaken. It is not a life- tum would secure victory. But, at line that could ‘save’ the revolution least partly due to the character of The fate of the revolution will be decided in Libya itself against Gaddafi. The major imperial- the opposition’s leadership, Gaddafi ist powers decided that they wanted was able to retain a grip in Tripoli, population, there has been a big have watched and supported the A programme for the Libyan revo- to exploit the revolution, gain control the largest city, of nearly 1.8 million. improvement in most Libyans’ lives, revolutions across the Middle East, lution that will genuinely benefit over its leadership and thus try to re- Gaddafi’s counter-offensive led to especially in education and health. will ask: ‘what can be done to genu- the mass of the population would place Gaddafi with a more reliable a change in attitude among the oppo- This is something which at least inely help the Libyan revolution in- be based on winning and defend- (for them and their interests) regime. sition towards foreign intervention. partly explains why Gaddafi still has ternationally?’ Firstly, there can be ing real democratic rights, an end to And they hoped that this demonstra- That allowed the largely pro-Western some basis of support amongst the no support for the no-fly zone and corruption and privilege, the safe- tion of their military power would ITNC to overcome youth opposition population. military intervention. It is not in the guarding and further development warn the Arab masses not to go ‘too to asking the West for aid. Unlike Egypt and Tunisia the interests of Libyan people. of the social gains made since the far’ in their revolutions. Now, if a stalemate develops and working class in Libya has not, so On its own the no-fly zone will not discovery of oil, opposition to any But it has already become clear Gaddafi remains in power in Tripo- far, begun to play an independent automatically lead to the overthrow form of re-colonisation and for a that the imperialist powers’ hope li, it could mean a de facto breakup role in the revolution. Furthermore of Gaddafi. In fact, like Saddam democratically controlled, publicly of a quick victory is disappearing. that goes back to the separate enti- many workers in Libya are migrants Hussein, he could entrench his po- owned economy planned to use the On the one hand, the forces around ties that existed before Italy first who have fled the country in recent sition for a time in those parts of the country’s resources for the future. Gaddafi, for the moment, appear created Libya after 1912 and Britain weeks. country that his regime controls, so The creation of an independent to be holding firm, while the rebel recreated it in the late 1940s. The absence of a national focal long as the intervention did not go movement of Libyan workers, poor forces seem unable to advance But, whatever effect this no-fly point which, for example, the Tuni- onto the offensive. and youth that could implement around the Gulf of Sirte, let alone zone and military intervention have, sian UGTT trade union federation However, the growing unofficial such a real revolutionary transfor- towards Tripoli. any trust placed in either the UN or provided (despite its pro-Ben Ali calls for ‘regime change’ show that mation of the country is the only way This is the background to the the imperialist powers threatens to national leadership), complicated sections of the imperialist powers to thwart the imperialists’ plans, end growing tensions between the at- undermine all the genuine hopes the situation in Libya. The huge rev- are looking to use their intervention dictatorship and transform the lives tacking powers, especially the ar- and aspirations of the revolution olutionary enthusiasm of the popu- to create a client regime that will, of the mass of the people. guments over who is controlling that began in February. lation has not, so far, been given an they hope, extinguish the fires of see www.socialistworld.net the operation, whether or not Nato Until recently these Western independent organised expression. revolution, at least in Libya. should be involved and over what powers were quite happy to deal Now, in addition to anti-imperial- Those on the left who argue that their overall aim should be. Some with, and pander to, the murderous ist rhetoric, Gaddafi has made con- ‘there is no realistic alternative’ to fear that they may get involved in Gaddafi clique in order to maintain cessions to maintain support. Each stop Gaddafi’s attacks are precisely a ground war, or that the country a partnership, especially in oil and family has been given the equivalent ignoring what happened in Tuni- SocialismToday could break up. gas. The day after the UN took its of $450. Some public sector workers sia and Egypt, namely that a deter- decision, the Murdoch-owned Wall have been given 150% wage increas- mined mass movement of the work- Street Journal lamented that: “the es and taxes and customs duties on ing masses and youth can overthrow Movement stalled close partnership between the Liby- food have been abolished. a dictatorship. A broad mobilisation The stalling of the revolution is an leader Colonel Muammar Gadd- But these steps do not wipe away of Benghazi’s one million plus pop- symbolised by the weakness of the afi’s intelligence service and the CIA all that has happened over the past ulation could have blocked Gadd- self-appointed leadership of the In- has been severed” (18/3/2011). years. Furthermore they do not an- afi’s small forces. terim Transitional National Coun- Now imperialism is trying to re- swer the demands for real demo- Active opposition to this imperi- cil (ITNC) which is dominated by furbish its ‘democratic’ image while cratic rights or an end to the growing alist attack and solidarity with the recent defectors from Gaddafi and working to help install a more ‘reli- frustration of Libya’s youthful popu- Libyan workers and youth needs to pro-capitalist elements. This body able’ regime in Libya, or at least a lation (average age of 24) against the be organised. Trade unions inter- seems incapable of appealing to the part of Libya. Libya, with its huge regime’s corruption and suffocating nationally need to block the export masses in western Libya and is in- oil reserves, is a special prize as its grip. of Libyan oil and gas. Bank workers The Socialist Party’s magazine creasingly relying on the imperialist small population and its geography Gaddafi’s use of the threat of im- should organise the freezing of all April 2011 issue includes: powers for aid. make it easier to exploit. perialist intervention to divide the the Gaddafi regime’s financial -as While the intervention in Libya country did gather some support. sets. l No Cuts! What next after initially beat back an attack on Now it may gain more if the coun- 26 March? Benghazi, it is clear that the attack- Role of the working class try does actually become divided, l Nuclear disaster in Japan ing powers, with their growing calls Gaddafi’s first reaction to this year’s especially if the air attacks continue Revolutionary programme l Socialists in the Irish for Gaddafi’s removal, are already dramatic revolutionary events was and widen out to civilian targets, as The fate of the revolution will be parliament starting to try to shape the character to side with the dictatorial, corrupt happened in Serbia in 1999.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Antisemitism Smears Against Corbyn Are Battering Ram of the Right
    22/08/2018 The Socialist issue 1006 Socialist Party | Print Editorial of the Socialist, issue 1006 Antisemitism smears against Corbyn are battering ram of the right Organise against the Blairites International working class solidarity against all oppression and racism In recent weeks accusations of antisemitism directed at Jeremy Corbyn have resurged to a fever pitch. Yet once again, when the substance of the cases is examined, they don't indicate that the Labour Party has a particular problem with antisemitism, either regarding the number of cases or their nature. What the onslaught shows very clearly however, is the way in which this issue is being used to attempt to inflict blows on Corbyn's leadership, as a battering ram by the capitalist establishment and Labour right wing in their drive to see him removed. Among the vehicles for the attacks is not the 'Jewish community' so regularly referred to by the right-wing media, but the current virulently anti-Corbyn leaderships of a few Jewish organisations, including the Jewish Leadership Council, the Board of Deputies and the Jewish Labour Movement. United with them in the aim of slandering Corbyn are Blairite Labour MPs, especially the 70-plus of them in Labour Friends of Israel, which is no more critical of Israel's Netanyahu-led government and its killings in Gaza than is the right-wing led Israeli Labour Party. Corbyn should face "unequivocal condemnation from everyone - left, right and everything in between", declared Netanyahu recently. Among the Blarites who obliged was Labour MP Chuka Umunna, who lambasted Corbyn in a piece for the Independent's website, accusing him of allowing "institutional racism" to "flourish" in Labour.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Opposition-Craft': an Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitte
    ‘Opposition-Craft’: An Evaluative Framework for Official Opposition Parties in the United Kingdom Edward Henry Lack Submitted in accordance with the requirements for the degree of PhD The University of Leeds, School of Politics and International Studies May, 2020 1 Intellectual Property and Publications Statements The candidate confirms that the work submitted is his own and that appropriate credit has been given where reference has been made to the work of others. This copy has been supplied on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. ©2020 The University of Leeds and Edward Henry Lack The right of Edward Henry Lack to be identified as Author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 2 Acknowledgements Page I would like to thank Dr Victoria Honeyman and Dr Timothy Heppell of the School of Politics and International Studies, The University of Leeds, for their support and guidance in the production of this work. I would also like to thank my partner, Dr Ben Ramm and my parents, David and Linden Lack, for their encouragement and belief in my efforts to undertake this project. Finally, I would like to acknowledge those who took part in the research for this PhD thesis: Lord David Steel, Lord David Owen, Lord Chris Smith, Lord Andrew Adonis, Lord David Blunkett and Dame Caroline Spelman. 3 Abstract This thesis offers a distinctive and innovative framework for the study of effective official opposition politics in the United Kingdom.
    [Show full text]
  • THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION of 1992 Other Books in This Series
    THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1992 Other books in this series THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1945 R. B. McCallum and Alison Readman THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1950 H. G. Nicholas THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1951 David Butler THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1955 David Butler THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1959 David Butler and Richard Rose THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1964 David Butler and Anthony King THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1966 David Butler and Anthony King THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1970 David Butler and Michael Pinto-Duschinsky THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF FEBRUARY 1974 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF OCTOBER 1974 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh THE 1975 REFERENDUM David Butler and Uwe Kitzinger THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1979 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh EUROPEAN ELECTIONS AND BRITISH POLITICS David Butler and David Marquand THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1983 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh PARTY STRATEGIES IN BRITAIN David Butler and Paul Jowett THE BRITISH GENERAL ELECTION OF 1987 David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh The British General Election of 1992 David Butler Fellow ofNuffield College, Oxford Dennis Kavanagh Professor of Politics, University of Nottingham M St. Martin's Press ©David Butler and Dennis Kavanagh 1992 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London WlP 9HE.
    [Show full text]
  • By-Election Results: Revised November 2003 1987-92
    Factsheet M12 House of Commons Information Office Members Series By-election results: Revised November 2003 1987-92 Contents There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Summary 2 Parliament. Of these by-elections, eight resulted Notes 3 Tables 3 in a change in winning party compared with the Constituency results 9 1987 General Election. The Conservatives lost Contact information 20 seven seats of which four went to the Liberal Feedback form 21 Democrats and three to Labour. Twenty of the by- elections were caused by the death of the sitting Member of Parliament, while three were due to resignations. This Factsheet is available on the internet through: http://www.parliament.uk/factsheets November 2003 FS No.M12 Ed 3.1 ISSN 0144-4689 © Parliamentary Copyright (House of Commons) 2003 May be reproduced for purposes of private study or research without permission. Reproduction for sale or other commercial purposes not permitted. 2 By-election results: 1987-92 House of Commons Information Office Factsheet M12 Summary There were 24 by-elections in the 1987 Parliament. This introduction gives some of the key facts about the results. The tables on pages 4 to 9 summarise the results and pages 10 to 17 give results for each constituency. Eight seats changed hands in the 1987 Parliament at by-elections. The Conservatives lost four seats to Labour and three to the Liberal Democrats. Labour lost Glasgow, Govan to the SNP. The merger of the Liberal Party and Social Democratic Party took place in March 1988 with the party named the Social and Liberal Democrats. This was changed to Liberal Democrats in 1989.
    [Show full text]
  • Corrispondenze Britanniche L’Egemonia Conservatrice; L’Ascesa Di Jeremy Corbyn
    Corrispondenze Britanniche L’Egemonia Conservatrice; l’ascesa di Jeremy Corbyn. Il Referendum sull’Unione Europea. La Brexit. di Andrea Genovese Le elezioni britanniche del 7 Maggio 2015 Di Andrea Genovese – 10 Maggio 2015 Un responso chiaro, inequivocabile, forse inatteso. I Conservatori di David Cameron ricevono un mandato forte dall’elettorato britannico, assicurandosi la maggioranza assoluta e la possibilità di procedere alla formazione di un governo monocolore dopo la “scomoda” co-abitazione coi Liberal-Democratici degli ultimi cinque anni. Tories da soli al comando, dunque; non accadeva dal 1992, dal successo di John Major. L’esito della consultazione consegna uno scenario denso di implicazioni, molte delle quali sottovalutate o poco considerate dagli organi d’informazione di casa nostra, che, nella consueta corsa alla faziosa semplificazione, poco hanno colto la vera essenza del voto britannico: un regolamento di conti interno al capitalismo, in cui i mass-media di regime (orchestrati e controllati dai grandi monopoli privati) hanno giocato un ruolo decisivo. Una premessa: il Sistema elettorale britannico Le elezioni per la Camera dei Comuni (come, del resto, quelle dei consigli comunali) sono regolate, in Gran Bretagna, dal sistema elettorale first-past-the-post: nient’altro che un uninominale di collegio secco. L’intero territorio del Regno Unito è suddiviso in 630 constituencies; ciascuna di esse invia a Westminster un unico rappresentante, il più votato. Le implicazioni di questo meccanismo sono molteplici: su base storica, infatti, è possibile identificare collegi sicuri (in cui esiste una consolidata tradizione politica, ed è improbabile produrre uno swing, ovvero un cambio di colore). Dunque, la campagna elettorale si concentra (sia in termini di risorse investite dai partiti; sia in termini di coinvolgimento di una residuale militanza), di fatto, nelle circoscrizioni in cui il risultato appare più incerto.
    [Show full text]
  • TUSC Candidates in the May Elections
    Candidates agreed to March 26th TUSC candidates in the May elections Below is the list of the Trade Unionist and Socialist Coalition (TUSC) candidates approved so far by the TUSC steering committee to stand in the various elections taking place on May 6th. To date there are over 330 approved candidates, comprising of three regional lists and three constituency candidates for the Scottish Parliament elections; all the regional lists for the Welsh Senedd; a regional list and three constituency candidates for the Greater London Authority assembly; two city Mayoral candidates – in Bristol and Liverpool; and 299 local council candidates contesting seats in 93 local authorities. The council candidate list is broken down into regions of England, with the number of candidates, and the authorities within the region where TUSC is contesting a seat, shown in parentheses. Scottish Parliament Candidates Glasgow region Brian Smith; Sinead Daly; Oisin Duncan; Maddie Jamieson Highlands & Islands region Sean Robertson; Yolanda Piotrowicz; Luke Ivory West of Scotland region Jim Halfpenny; Lynda McEwan; Ian Kerr Aberdeen Donside constituency Lucas Grant Dundee City East constituency Wayne Scott Dundee City West constituency Jim McFarlane Welsh Senedd Candidates Mid and West Wales region Carys Phillips North Wales region Michelle Francis South Wales Central region Ross Saunders; Beth Webster; Mia Hollsing; Kevin Gillan; Andrew Wilkes South Wales East region Mariam Kamish; Cammilla Mngaza; Melanie Benedict; Dave Reid South Wales West region Mark Evans; Karen
    [Show full text]
  • City Bosses'аг40m Bonuses As Number of Food
    Socialist Party | Print City bosses' £40m bonuses as Number of food banks hits 2,000 Tories out! Corbyn in! Take the wealth off the 1%! Geraint Thomas, Nottingham Socialist party While working class people across Britain go hungry, directors of massive corporations continue to rake in obscene bonuses. Senior bosses at investment firm Melrose Industries will split a £240 million bonus pot between them. The top four directors are getting a whopping £40 million each. Even London financiers are worrying about how bad handouts like this look. But the warning by the Investment Association of revolts at corporate AGMs over bonuses seems to be falling on deaf ears. Benefit delays Meanwhile, research by the Independent Food Aid Network found that there are at least 2,024 food banks in the UK. The Trussell Trust, running just 427 of these food banks, recorded that it had handed out 1.2 million food parcels to an estimated 550,000 people. Low income and benefit delays were the biggest reasons for workers being forced into the humiliation of going to food banks. These figures only scratch the surface of the problem. Several co­workers at my last job regularly made the choice of heating or eating over the winter thanks to low hours and pay. Even nurses are affected, hit by the pay cap and rising living costs ­ hardly the "complex reasons" Theresa May claimed. The Melrose bosses' £240 million will be paying for expensive cars and mansions and filling up tax­dodging banks. That money could easily be used by a Corbyn­led socialist government to create thousands of decently paid jobs.
    [Show full text]
  • Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain
    Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain Jongcheol Kim Department of Law London School of Economics and Political Science UMI Number: U117335 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. Dissertation Publishing UMI U117335 Published by ProQuest LLC 2014. Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code. ProQuest LLC 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106-1346 Constitutionalising Political Parties in Britain A Thesis Submitted to the University of London for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Jongcheol Kim (LL.B., LL.M.) Department of Law London School of Economics and Political Science 1998 S F 75S2 70/43Z Preface When almost five years ago I came to London to study British public law, I had no specific topic in mind that might form the basis for my Ph.D. course. I came with no particular background in British law, but having studied American constitutional law, the oldest written constitution in the modem world, I have decided it would be of considerable interest to further my understanding of modem constitutionalism by looking at the oldest example of an unwritten constitution. My knowledge of British public law was, then, extremely shallow and came almost exclusively from translating into Korean A.V.Dicey’s classic work,An Introduction to the Law o f the Constitution.
    [Show full text]
  • Weekly Worker April 30)
    Socialist Party weekly in crisis here are few things more stom- the existence of a timeless, transcen- ach-churning than watching dental, ahistorical evil which pos- T bourgeois society going sesses certain individuals - and not through one of its moralistic spasms. others. This is the force responsible Over the last week we have been bom- for producing Mary Bell - and Syd- barded by sensationalist stories about ney Cooke, Fred West, Thomas Ham- the “child killer” Mary Bell. The bigot- ilton, Peter Sutcliffe, etc. fuelled tabloids, of course, have had Naturally, anyone who challenges a field day, stoking up prejudice and orthodox reactionary assumptions is all manner of backward ideas. immediately suspect - and risks being Unsurprisingly, tabloid editors stifled. (For example, look at the at- have been working overtime evoking tempts to ban the ‘offensive’ film lurid images which could come from Crash.) The Omen or The Exorcist - watch out The real facts about the grim and for ‘children of Satan’ or armies of tragic life of the young Mary Bell do zombie-like killer-children roaming not fit into the neat and easy catego- your street. As Emma Forest wrote in ries conjured up the salivating tab- The Guardian: “In reporting on mur- loids. Sentenced to life imprisonment der, there is an unspoken tabloid rule: in 1968 at the age of 11 for the man- when men kill it’s bad. When women slaughter of two boys aged four and kill it’s evil. And when children kill it’s three, Mary Bell had suffered appall- satanic” (May 4). ing maltreatment - sexual abuse and Thus, naturally, Mary Bell is sup- general deprivation - at the hands of posed to become a hate figure - so her mother and her ‘male visitors’.
    [Show full text]
  • To Download the Paper As A
    So& Wloirkdersa’ Lirbeirtty y No 214 24 August 2011 30p/80p For a workers’ government Ban the EDL? 1911: Liverpool The religion of the page 3 on strike page 8-9 Socialist Party pages 11-12 Post-riot clampdown on working-class youth OPPOSE THIS CLASS-HATE BLITZ See page 5 More socialist ideas and labour movement news online: www.workersliberty.org NEWS What is the Alliance for Workers’ Liberty? Libya: the return of hope Today one class, the working class, lives by selling From back page workers’ rights. gogue on the British left and its annihilation, it is its labour power to another, the capitalist class, But in fact the funda - will ever have to face. irresponsible and morally which owns the means of production. Society Outright support for Qaddafi is confined to a mental lesson of Libya — Workers’ Liberty be - degenerate to simply de - is shaped by the capitalists’ relentless drive to marginal fringe of sects,. as with all the heroic and lieves that a people staring mand that it ceases, or to increase their wealth. Capitalism causes inspiring uprisings we down the wrong end of a oppose it ever taking poverty, unemployment, the blighting of lives by For most of the far-left, have see in the Middle state-sanctioned massacre place. We believe that the overwork, imperialism, the destruction of the the intervention of NATO East and North Africa this have the right to call for gains of the uprising vin - environment and much else. in Libya cancelled out the year — is that no ruling assistance, even from im - dicate that view.
    [Show full text]
  • 1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin
    1999 Election Candidates | European Parliament Information Office in the United Kin ... Page 1 of 10 UK Office of the European Parliament Home > 1999 > 1999 Election Candidates Candidates The list of candidates was based on the information supplied by Regional Returning Officers at the close of nominations on 13 May 2004. Whilst every care was taken to ensure that this information is accurate, we cannot accept responsibility for any omissions or inaccuracies or for any consequences that may result. Voters in the UK's twelve EU constituencies will elect 78 MEPs. The distribution of seats is as follows: Eastern: 7 East Midlands: 6 London: 9 North East: 3 North West: 9 South East: 10 South West: 7 West Midlands: 7 Yorkshire and the Humber: 6 Scotland: 7 Wales: 4 Northern Ireland: 3 Eastern LABOUR CONSERVATIVE 1. Eryl McNally, MEP 1. Robert Sturdy, MEP 2. Richard Howitt, MEP 2. Christopher Beazley 3. Clive Needle, MEP 3. Bashir Khanbhai 4. Peter Truscott, MEP 4. Geoffrey Van Orden 5. David Thomas, MEP 5. Robert Gordon 6. Virginia Bucknor 6. Kay Twitchen 7. Beth Kelly 7. Sir Graham Bright 8. Ruth Bagnall 8. Charles Rose LIBERAL DEMOCRAT GREEN 1. Andrew Duff 1. Margaret Elizabeth Wright 2. Rosalind Scott 2. Marc Scheimann 3. Robert Browne 3. Eleanor Jessy Burgess 4. Lorna Spenceley 4. Malcolm Powell 5. Chris White 5. James Abbott 6. Charlotte Cane 6. Jennifer Berry 7. Paul Burall 7. Angela Joan Thomson 8. Rosalind Gill 8. Adrian Holmes UK INDEPENDENCE PRO EURO CONSERVATIVE PARTY 1. Jeffrey Titford 1. Paul Howell 2. Bryan Smalley 2.
    [Show full text]
  • The Socialist Issue 786
    The Socialist issue 786 Socialist Party | Print Striking back! Rob Williams, Socialist Party trade union organiser Hundreds of thousands of workers are preparing to take strike action. This proves to the bosses and their Con-Dem government that the battle against their cuts is continuing. Higher Education workers in UCU, Unison and Unite unions are striking together on 31 October. Firefighters, members of the FBU, are on strike on Friday 1 November and the following Monday. CWU postal workers and Crown Post Office workers are also out on Monday to send a defiant message to the government after Vince Cable's give-away sell-off of Royal Mail and the closure of post offices. Probation workers in Napo are striking for 24 hours over Tuesday and Wednesday against privatisation. Workers are painfully aware of the chasm between the supposed economic recovery and the catastrophe we are experiencing in our living standards. The poisonous Tory media are crowing over the brutal terms that Grangemouth workers accepted to keep their jobs. They want to send the message to all workers - 'This is the real world and you have to accept it'. But millions of workers facing the sky-high price rises from the fat-cat energy companies know all about the real world and are furious about it! In the last three years, official figures show that real wages in the UK have fallen by 5.5%. No wonder that those in work, let alone people suffering on poverty benefits, are having to choose between food and heating their homes. The decision of the leaderships of the NUT and NASUWT teachers' unions not to take national strike action as originally agreed doesn't tally with the mood of teachers on their regional strikes.
    [Show full text]