DOCSLIB.ORG

University of California, Santa Barbara

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
University of California, Santa Barbara F O CA Y L IT I S F O R A R E N V I I A N LE , U T L University of California Santa Barbara IG T H T S H A E RE E A N B R T A A BARB Department of History Santa Barbara, California 93106-9410 Laura Kalman July 31, 2016 Dear Members of the NYU Legal History Colloquium: Thank you so much for agreeing to read my book manuscript! (And please do not copy, cite or circulate it without permission.) I have just submitted the manuscript (seconds ago) to Oxford for copy-editing, so I won’t be able to add any new chapters, based on what you tell me. But I will be able to make changes when the manuscript comes back from the copy-editor and before I submit the final version. It would ideal if you could make your criticisms as targeted/specific as possible so I know what to fix, massage, rewrite, add, delete, etc. But whatever you say, I really look forward to being with all of you again. Best wishes, Laura Kalman, Professor of History, UCSB 2 Colloquium on Constitutional & Legal History NYU School of Law August 31, 2016 The Long Reach of the Sixties: LBJ, Nixon and Supreme Court Nominations Laura Kalman [email protected] 805-453-8673 3 In Memory Of Newton Kalman, 1920-2010 Celeste Garr, 1924-2010 John Morton Blum, 1921-2011 Lee Kalman, 1919-2014 Protectors, Promoters, Teachers, Friends 4 Preface On February 13, 2016, friends found the body of the Supreme Court’s preeminent conservative in his suite at a hunting resort in West Texas. Seventy-nine-year-old Antonin Scalia had unexpectedly died of natural causes just as the nation moved into an unusually fraught Presidential primary season. With the Court frequently divided on big issues 4-4 between “liberals” and “conservatives,” and another 79-year-old justice, Anthony Kennedy, casting the swing vote, “Scalia’s Death Offers Best Chance in a Generation to Reshape Supreme Court,” the New York Times declared. Since President Obama had almost a year left in office and promised to fulfill his constitutional duty by naming a new justice, his fellow Democrats expected him to do so, though many doubted that the Republican Senate would confirm the nominee. After all, less than two hours before the public learned of Scalia’s death, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky had incensed Democrats by declaring that “it only makes sense that we defer to the American people who will elect a new president to select the next Supreme Court justice.”1 Five weeks later, Obama nevertheless nominated Merrick Garland, a white Harvard College and Law School alumnus. Like almost all justices since the mid-1970s, Garland was a federal judge with sterling credentials. He had been Articles Editor of the Harvard Law Review and had clerked for two legendary judges, Henry Friendly and William Brennan. He had also served as a partner in one of the capital’s preeminent law firms, federal prosecutor in the Bush I Administration, and Deputy Assistant Attorney General in the Clinton Administration before Clinton successfully named him to the DC Circuit Court of Appeals. By some standards Garland was centrist; by others, a centrist 5 liberal slightly to the right of the Court’s liberals. While he was the best the Republicans could hope for, a Justice Garland seemed likely to move the Court leftwards. Senate Republicans simply refused to hold hearings.2 Obviously, the Supreme Court nomination would play a critical role in the political season. By this time, Americans had grown accustomed to the eruption of periodic battles royal over Supreme Court vacancies, particularly when the President’s party did not control the Senate. Some traced the origins of this state of affairs to Ronald Reagan’s unsuccessful nomination of Robert Bork in 1987. In fact, it began over twenty years earlier when Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon created a new kind of Presidential politics around nominations to the Supreme Court. 3 *** The Long Reach of the Sixties shows how, between 1965 and 1971, Supreme Court nominees and their confirmations became critical to Presidential politics. As Lyndon Johnson and Richard Nixon, the Senate, prospective justices, members of the Court, interest groups and the public mobilized, they created and politicized the modern nomination and confirmation process. The period saw two successful Supreme Court nominations and two failed ones by Johnson, and four successful Supreme Court nominations and two failed ones by Nixon. The quest to enlist the Court in consolidating Presidential power caused big battles that had lasting consequences for the Court’s political significance and the selection and confirmation of Supreme Court justices that still resonate for the Garland nomination today. Scholars have long focused on the turning point that Roosevelt’s 1937 Court Packing Plan posed for President, Court and country. After the resolution of that crisis, 6 however, the Court and its membership consumed space in Presidents’ partisan calculations only sporadically. FDR wasted little time worrying about the Senate’s reaction to his prospective Supreme Court nominees or what they would do as justices-- which may be one reason they fought with each other so much. That pattern continued under Truman, Eisenhower and Kennedy.4 Then, when LBJ and Nixon in rapid succession tried to enlist the Court in service of their Presidencies, the Senate asserted itself and nominations became more fraught. Just as we evaluate the impact of Presidential nominees on the Court, we need to examine prospective justices in the context of the Presidency. As Johnson and Nixon saw it, they needed a clearer idea of what potential candidates for Court vacancies would do because the Supreme Court under Earl Warren was making waves by transforming the meaning of the Constitution for civil rights, criminal procedure, internal security, reapportionment, religion and speech. With their expansive vision of the political chessboard and potential chess pieces, LBJ and Nixon modeled for their successors how the President should and should not factor the Court into the politics of the Presidency. With his first nomination, Johnson sought to install a spy at the Supreme Court, to maintain the tradition of the “Jewish seat,” and to continue keeping tabs on the Justice Department. With his second, Johnson created the “black seat” by naming the first African American to sit on the Court at a time when he worried that the civil rights consensus underlying Cold War liberalism was teetering. With his two failed nominations in 1968, LBJ hoped to reward devoted friends and to sustain the ideological momentum of the Warren Court, though he had some reservations about it. Like Chief Justice Warren, LBJ considered the Court part and parcel of his Great Society. For that 7 and other reasons, Republicans and southern Democrats derailed the nominations in a brawl about Johnson’s attempt to name “cronies” to the Court; the Warren Court’s civil rights, criminal law and obscenity decisions; and charges of financial impropriety. 5 The Warren Court became Richard Nixon’s quarry. He used it to win election in 1968 and to unify, shape and broaden the modern Republican Party. As President, he tried to create vacancies by getting rid of two of the Court’s most liberal members, and he nominated six individuals to the Supreme Court whom he touted as “strict constructionists” or “constitutionalists.” Now, liberal Democrats, often aided by moderate or progressive Republicans, mounted a counterattack. The Long Reach of the Sixties turns the spotlight on Johnson and Nixon’s attempts to populate the Court between 1965 and 1971. Using recordings of Presidential telephone conversations, along with archival sources, it grounds the efforts by LBJ and Nixon to shape the Court in the political history of their Presidencies. It places the ideological contest over the Court within the context of the struggle between the Executive, Judicial and Legislative branches of government and interest group mobilization. The fights that followed fixed the image of the Warren Court as “activist” and liberal” in one of the arenas where that image matters most, the contemporary Supreme Court appointments process. The book also investigates the ways in which the sixties have haunted and scarred that process. Of course, Supreme Court nominees had faced attack before the late Warren era. But even by the standards of the nineteenth century, when confirmation struggles over Supreme Court justices routinely occurred, the fights about nominees from 1967-71 proved exceptionally contentious. If how we react to a Supreme Court nominee 8 depends on whose ox is gored, what makes this period special is that Warren Court partisans and antagonists alike had plenty of oxen at risk for slaughter. We improve our understanding of the combination of political and constitutional developments that have made so many nominations since the mid-twentieth century so significant if we root the modern Supreme Court appointments process in “the sixties,” a period that lasted into the early seventies. But we should recognize, that just as contingency pervades history, it plays a large role in this story. Like other Presidents, LBJ and Nixon named people to the Supreme Court according to Holmes’s proverbial “felt necessities of the time,” and, as ever, all history “teaches” us is that history turns on a dime. If political science is too neat to instruct Americans on how to govern, history is too messy. Nevertheless, in a real and often unfortunate way, Johnson’s and Nixon’s tussles over nominations have shaped how the Warren Court is remembered and how justices have been chosen and confirmed ever since.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Volume 59, Issue 1
    Volume 60, Issue 4 Page 1023 Stanford Law Review THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal & Richard Caplan © 2008 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University, from the Stanford Law Review at 60 STAN. L. REV. 1023 (2008). For information visit http://lawreview.stanford.edu. THE SURPRISINGLY STRONGER CASE FOR THE LEGALITY OF THE NSA SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM: THE FDR PRECEDENT Neal Katyal* and Richard Caplan** INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................1024 I. THE NSA CONTROVERSY .................................................................................1029 A. The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act................................................1029 B. The NSA Program .....................................................................................1032 II. THE PRECURSOR TO THE FDR PRECEDENT: NARDONE I AND II........................1035 A. The 1934 Communications Act .................................................................1035 B. FDR’s Thirst for Intelligence ....................................................................1037 C. Nardone I...................................................................................................1041 D. Nardone II .................................................................................................1045 III. FDR’S DEFIANCE OF CONGRESS AND THE SUPREME COURT..........................1047 A. Attorney General
    [Show full text]
  • The Nixon Appointments to the United
    University of Massachusetts Amherst ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 1-1-1975 The iN xon appointments to the United States Courts of Appeals : the impact of the law and order issue on the rights of the accused. Jon Spencer Gottschall University of Massachusetts Amherst Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1 Recommended Citation Gottschall, Jon Spencer, "The iN xon appointments to the United States Courts of Appeals : the impact of the law and order issue on the rights of the accused." (1975). Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014. 1852. https://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_1/1852 This Open Access Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. It has been accepted for inclusion in Doctoral Dissertations 1896 - February 2014 by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@UMass Amherst. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE NIXON APPOINTMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS: THE IMPACT OF THE LAW AND ORDER ISSUE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE ACCUSED A Dissertation Presented By Jon Spencer Gottschall Submitted to the Graduate School of the University of Massachusetts in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY August, 1975 Political Science (c) Jon Spencer Gottschall, 1976 All Rights Reserved THE NIXON APPOINTMENTS TO THE UNITED STATES COURTS OF APPEALS: THE IMP:.CT OF THE LAVJ AND ORDER ISSUE ON THr; RIGHTS OF THE iiCCUSED A Dissertation By Jon Spencer Gottschall Approved as to style and content by: Uarvey Kline, Chairman 7-iugust, 19 75 The Nixon Appointees to the United States Courts of Appeals: The Impact of the Law and Order Issue on the Rights of the Accused (August 1975) Jon S.
    [Show full text]
  • Fall 2010 U.S
    178451_Cover_B.qxd:178451_Cover_B 12/6/10 10:04 PM Page 1 Nonprofit Org. FALL 2010 U.S. Postage IN THIS ISSUE FALL 2010 FALL 421 Mondale Hall PAID New Environmental Courses • Q&A: Anderson & Rosenbaum • Super CLE Week • Don Marshall Tribute 229 19th Avenue South Minneapolis, MN Minneapolis, MN 55455 Permit No. 155 Perspectives E NVIRONMENTAL C APRIL 15—16, 2011 OURSES • Q&A: A PLEASE JOIN US AS WE CELEBRATE THE LAW SCHOOL AND ITS ALUMNI IN A WEEKEND OF ACTIVITIES FOR THE ENTIRE LAW SCHOOL COMMUNITY. NDERSON Friday, April 15: All-Alumni Cocktail Reception Saturday, April 16: Alumni Breakfast & CLE & R OSENBAUM SPECIAL REUNION EVENTS WILL BE HELD FOR THE CLASSES OF: 1961, 1971, 1976, 1981, 1986, 1991, 1996, 2001, and 2006 • CLE • D FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, OR IF YOU ARE INTERESTED IN PARTICIPATING IN ON M THE PLANNING OF YOUR CLASS REUNION, PLEASE CONTACT EVAN P. JOHNSON, ARSHALL Alumni Relations & Annual Giving Program Manager T 612.625.6584 or [email protected] RIBUTE Spring Alumni Weekend is about returning to remember your years at the Law School and the friendships you built here. We encourage those of you with class reunions in 2011 to “participate in something great” by making an increased gift or pledge to the Law School this year. Where the Trials Are www.law.umn.edu WWW.COMMUNITY.LAW.UMN.EDU/SAW Criminal law is challenging but satisfying, say alumni from all sides of the courtroom. 178451_Cover_B.qxd:178451_Cover_B178451_Cover_B.qxd:178451_Cover_B 12/6/10 12/6/10 10:04 10:04 PM PagePM Page2 2 178451_Section A FrMatter.qxd:178451_Section A FrMatter 12/3/10 11:56 AM Page 1 Securing Our Future his fall we welcomed 260 first-year students, along with 36 LL.M.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Oral History Collections in Missouri
    Guide to Oral History Collections in Missouri. Compiled and Edited by David E. Richards Special Collections & Archives Department Duane G. Meyer Library Missouri State University Springfield, Missouri Last updated: September 16, 2012 This guide was made possible through a grant from the Richard S. Brownlee Fund from the State Historical Society of Missouri and support from Missouri State University. Introduction Missouri has a wealth of oral history recordings that document the rich and diverse population of the state. Beginning around 1976, libraries, archives, individual researchers, and local historical societies initiated oral history projects and began recording interviews on audio cassettes. The efforts continued into the 1980s. By 2000, digital recorders began replacing audio cassettes and collections continued to grow where staff, time, and funding permitted. As with other states, oral history projects were easily started, but transcription and indexing efforts generally lagged behind. Hundreds of recordings existed for dozens of discreet projects, but access to the recordings was lacking or insufficient. Larger institutions had the means to transcribe, index, and catalog their oral history materials, but smaller operations sometimes had limited access to their holdings. Access was mixed, and still is. This guide attempts to aggregate nearly all oral history holdings within the state and provide at least basic, minimal access to holdings from the largest academic repository to the smallest county historical society. The effort to provide a guide to the oral history collections of Missouri started in 2002 with a Brownlee Fund Grant from the State Historical Society of Missouri. That initial grant provided the seed money to create and send out a mail-in survey.
    [Show full text]
  • Law and Lawyers: the Road to Reform Kenneth W
    Fordham Law Review Volume 63 | Issue 4 Article 3 1995 Law and Lawyers: The Road To Reform Kenneth W. Starr Recommended Citation Kenneth W. Starr, Law and Lawyers: The Road To Reform, 63 Fordham L. Rev. 959 (1995). Available at: http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol63/iss4/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized administrator of FLASH: The orF dham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. LAW AND LAWYERS: THE ROAD TO REFORM KENNETH W. STARR* M Y reflections this evening, which focus on our nation's justice system, reflect broader social concerns, going to the basic struc- ture of American institutions and the precipitous decline in trust re- posed in those institutions. Let me not mince words. As a people, Americans have become highly distrustful and disrespectful of institutions, ranging from the basic social unit of the traditional nuclear family to churches and syna- gogues, schools and universities, and in this election season, of govern- ment itself. Courts-the justice system-are no exception to this powerful trend. In my view, the trend is broad-based and deep enough to be profoundly disturbing. What explains this trend of distrust and disrespect? Part of the an- swer, I believe, lies in America's inherent, culturally rooted suspicion of power. We are, at bottom, an anti-power society. We are a revolu- tionary society.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapman Law Review
    Chapman Law Review Volume 21 Board of Editors 2017–2018 Executive Board Editor-in-Chief LAUREN K. FITZPATRICK Managing Editor RYAN W. COOPER Senior Articles Editors Production Editor SUNEETA H. ISRANI MARISSA N. HAMILTON TAYLOR A. KENDZIERSKI CLARE M. WERNET Senior Notes & Comments Editor TAYLOR B. BROWN Senior Symposium Editor CINDY PARK Senior Submissions & Online Editor ALBERTO WILCHES –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– Articles Editors ASHLEY C. ANDERSON KRISTEN N. KOVACICH ARLENE GALARZA STEVEN L. RIMMER NATALIE M. GAONA AMANDA M. SHAUGHNESSY-FORD ANAM A. JAVED DAMION M. YOUNG __________________________________________________________________ Staff Editors RAYMOND AUBELE AMY N. HUDACK JAMIE L. RICE CARLOS BACIO MEGAN A. LEE JAMIE L. TRAXLER HOPE C. BLAIN DANTE P. LOGIE BRANDON R. SALVATIERRA GEORGE E. BRIETIGAM DRAKE A. MIRSCH HANNAH B. STETSON KATHERINE A. BURGESS MARLENA MLYNARSKA SYDNEY L. WEST KYLEY S. CHELWICK NICHOLE N. MOVASSAGHI Faculty Advisor CELESTINE MCCONVILLE, Professor of Law CHAPMAN UNIVERSITY HAZEM H. CHEHABI ADMINISTRATION JEROME W. CWIERTNIA DALE E. FOWLER ’58 DANIELE C. STRUPPA BARRY GOLDFARB President STAN HARRELSON GAVIN S. HERBERT,JR. GLENN M. PFEIFFER WILLIAM K. HOOD Provost and Executive Vice ANDY HOROWITZ President for Academic Affairs MARK CHAPIN JOHNSON ’05 JENNIFER L. KELLER HAROLD W. HEWITT,JR. THOMAS E. MALLOY Executive Vice President and Chief SEBASTIAN PAUL MUSCO Operating Officer RICHARD MUTH (MBA ’05) JAMES J. PETERSON SHERYL A. BOURGEOIS HARRY S. RINKER Executive Vice President for JAMES B. ROSZAK University Advancement THE HONORABLE LORETTA SANCHEZ ’82 HELEN NORRIS MOHINDAR S. SANDHU Vice President and Chief RONALD M. SIMON Information Officer RONALD E. SODERLING KAREN R. WILKINSON ’69 THOMAS C. PIECHOTA DAVID W.
    [Show full text]
  • DISQUALIFICATION of JUDGES: in SUPPORT of the BAYH BILL Jomi P
    DISQUALIFICATION OF JUDGES: IN SUPPORT OF THE BAYH BILL Jomi P. FRANK*t The defeat of Judge Clement Haynsworth, Jr., for the Supreme Court demonstrates that the federal law of disqualification of judges needs to be rewritten. As Justice Blackmun said of a shift in his own personal disqualification practice, "The times have changed."1 John Marshall heard Marbury v. Madison although the substance of the case involved problems arising from his own failure to deliver papers when he was Secre- tary of State in the Madison administration. Justices Byron White and Thurgood Marshall, former Deputy Attorney General and Solicitor General, never hear cases involving matters with which they dealt in the Department of Justice. The difference is not in the character of the Justices, but in the governing law and the changed attitudes of recent times. In Marshall's day, the law of disqualifica- tion was governed by two maxims from the sages. Coke, in the most famous rubric of the law of disqualification, had said, "aliquis non debet esse judex in propria causa," or no man shall be a judge in his own case Blackstone had reduced this to a straight matter of pocketbook interest by excluding the possibility of disqualifica- tion for bias or prejudice or relationship, "for the law will not suppose the possi- bility of bias or favor in a judge."' * (Mr. Frank, author of numerous books on the United States Supreme Court, is presently in private practice in Phoenix, Arizona Ed.) t I have been assisted in this article by Mr. John McLamb, a student at Yale Law School.
    [Show full text]
  • 134TH COMMENCEMENT James E
    134 th Commencement MAY 2021 Welcome Dear Temple graduates, Congratulations! Today is a day of celebration for you and all those who have supported you in your Temple journey. I couldn’t be more proud of the diverse and driven students who are graduating this spring. Congratulations to all of you, to your families and to our dedicated faculty and academic advisors who had the pleasure of educating and championing you. If Temple’s founder Russell Conwell were alive to see your collective achievements today, he’d be thrilled and amazed. In 1884, he planted the seeds that have grown and matured into one of this nation’s great urban research universities. Now it’s your turn to put your own ideas and dreams in motion. Even if you experience hardships or disappointments, remember the motto Conwell left us: Perseverantia Vincit, Perseverance Conquers. We have faith that you will succeed. Thank you so much for calling Temple your academic home. While I trust you’ll go far, remember that you will always be part of the Cherry and White. Plan to come back home often. Sincerely, Richard M. Englert President UPDATED: 05/07/2021 Contents The Officers and the Board of Trustees ............................................2 Candidates for Degrees James E. Beasley School of Law ....................................................3 Esther Boyer College of Music and Dance .....................................7 College of Education and Human Development ...........................11 College of Engineering ...............................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Powerbroker: Whitney Young’S Fight for Civil Rights
    DISCUSSION GUIDE The Powerbroker: Whitney Young’s Fight for Civil Rights PBS.ORG/indePendenTLens/POWERBROKER Table of Contents 1 Using this Guide 2 From the Filmmaker 3 The Film 4 Background Information 5 Biographical Information on Whitney Young 6 The Leaders and Their Organizations 8 From Nonviolence to Black Power 9 How Far Have We Come? 10 Topics and Issues Relevant to The Powerbroker: Whitney Young’s Fight for Civil Rights 10 Thinking More Deeply 11 Suggestions for Action 12 Resources 13 Credits national center for MEDIA ENGAGEMENT Using this Guide Community Cinema is a rare public forum: a space for people to gather who are connected by a love of stories, and a belief in their power to change the world. This discussion guide is designed as a tool to facilitate dialogue, and deepen understanding of the complex issues in the film The Powerbroker: Whitney Young’s Fight for Civil Rights. It is also an invitation to not only sit back and enjoy the show — but to step up and take action. This guide is not meant to be a comprehensive primer on a given topic. Rather, it provides important context, and raises thought provoking questions to encourage viewers to think more deeply. We provide suggestions for areas to explore in panel discussions, in the classroom, in communities, and online. We also provide valuable resources, and connections to organizations on the ground that are fighting to make a difference. For information about the program, visit www.communitycinema.org DISCUSSION GUIDE // THE POWERBROKER 1 From the Filmmaker I wanted to make The Powerbroker: Whitney Young’s Fight for Civil Rights because I felt my uncle, Whitney Young, was an important figure in American history, whose ideas were relevant to his generation, but whose pivotal role was largely misunderstood and forgotten.
    [Show full text]
  • Top of Page Interview Information--Different Title
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Disability Rights and Independent Living Movement Oral History Project Thomas K. Gilhool LEGAL ADVOCATE FOR DEINSTITUTIONALIZATION AND THE RIGHT TO EDUCATION FOR PEOPLE WITH DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES Interviews conducted by Fred Pelka 2004-2008 Copyright © 2010 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Thomas K. Gilhool, dated April 6, 2005. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • Records of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, 1954–1970
    A Guide to the Microfilm Edition of BLACK STUDIES RESEARCH SOURCES Microfilms from Major Archival and Manuscript Collections General Editors: John H. Bracey, Jr. and August Meier Records of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, 1954–1970 Part 1: Records of the President’s Office Editorial Adviser Cynthia P. Lewis Project Coordinator Randolph H. Boehm Guide compiled by Blair Hydrick A microfilm project of UNIVERSITY PUBLICATIONS OF AMERICA An Imprint of CIS 4520 East-West Highway • Bethesda, MD 20814-3389 Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Records of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, 1954–1970 [microform] / project coordinator, Randolph H. Boehm. microfilm reels. — (Black studies research sources) Accompanied by a printed guide, compiled by Blair D. Hydrick, entitled: A guide to the microfilm edition of Records of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, 1954–1970. Contents: pt. 1. Records of the President’s Office—pt. 2. Records of the Executive Director and Treasurer—[etc.]—pt. 4. Records of the Program Department. ISBN 1-55655-555-5 (pt. 1 : microfilm) 1. Southern Christian Leadership Conference—Archives. 2. Afro- Americans—Civil rights—Southern States—History—Sources. 3. Civil rights movements—United States—History—20th century— Sources. 4. Southern States—Race relations—History—Sources. I. Boehm, Randolph. II. Hydrick, Blair. III. Southern Christian Leadership Conference. IV. University Publications of America (Firm) V. Title: Guide to the microfilm edition of Records of the Southern Christian Leadership Conference, 1954–1970. VI. Series. [E185.61] 323.1’196073075—dc20 95-24346 CIP Copyright © 1996 by University Publications of America. All rights reserved. ISBN 1-55655-555-5.
    [Show full text]
  • RITUALES DE LA TRANSFIGURACIÓN Rubin Filma Enchristmas on Earth Una Orgía En Un Lugar Indeterminado, Fuera Barbara Rubin: Del Tiempo Y El Espacio
    Flaming Creatures, 1936. Jack Smith Domingo 18:30 h RITUALES DE LA TRANSFIGURACIÓN Rubin filma enChristmas on Earth una orgía en un lugar indeterminado, fuera Barbara Rubin: del tiempo y el espacio. La doble proyección superpuesta de esta película se Christmas on Earth, 1963, 29 min. desarrolla de manera diferente en cada sesión. Lucifer Rising, por su parte, desarrolla la fascinación de Anger por el ocultismo, Aleister Crowley y la ima- Kenneth Anger: ginería del antiguo Egipto. Esta película generó su propia mitología en torno a Lucifer Rising, 1972, 29 min. los participantes en el rodaje (Marianne Faithfull, el hermano de Mick Jagger o (Copia de Cinédoc París Films Coop) el líder de Led Zeppelin, Jimmy Page, entre otros) y a las vicisitudes que sufrió la filmación original. En Flaming Creatures, Smith juega a filmar situaciones Jack Smith: aparentemente inconexas, quizás cercanas a la performance, en una película Flaming Creatures, 1963, 45 min. que valió a su creador un juicio por obscenidad. Proyección en 16 mm Mayores de 18 años 01. Christmas on Earth, por Ara Osterweil Chica judía de clase media del barrio de Queens, [Barbara] Rubin llegó a la comunidad del cine underground de Nueva York cuando solo era una adolescente. A diferencia de la adolescente común, sin embargo, Rubin acababa de salir de un correccional de menores por consumo de drogas, consumo que había iniciado, paradójicamente, después de ingerir un buen puñado de píldoras dietéticas recetadas para con- 01 02 03 trolar su peso. Gracias a su tío, William Rubin, que por aquel entonces dirigía el Gramercy Arts Theater, donde se realizaban muchas proyec- ciones de películas de vanguardia, Barbara conoció a Jonas Mekas, el 03.
    [Show full text]