The Energetic Society and Innovation Potential
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Geschäftsstelle Almere Msg Life Benelux B.V
Anfahrtsbeschreibung Geschäftsstelle Almere msg life Benelux B.V. PJ Oudweg 41 | 1314 CJ Almere | Niederlande Telefon: +31 33 798 0000 | E-Mail: [email protected] | www.msg-life.com Anreise mit öffentlichen Verkehrsmitteln Almere Tussen de Vaarten abbiegen. Folgen Sie der s101/ Vom Hauptbahnhof Amsterdam: 20-30 min Fahrtzeit Hogering. Folgen Sie dem Straßenverlauf für 1.600 m und Nehmen Sie den Zug in Richtung Almere Centrum/Zwolle biegen Sie links in das Markerdreef ein. Nach 900 m bie- bis zur Haltestelle Almere Centrum. Dann nehmen Sie den gen Sie rechts in das Spoordreef ab und nach 1,3 km links nördlichen Ausgang, gehen zum WTC-Gebäude und biegen in die Schoutstraat. Sie befinden sich nun in der Schoutga- links ab auf P. J. Oudplein. Nach ca. 70 m biegen Sie rechts rage. in den P. J. Oudweg ein. Aus Richtung Zwolle: ca. 75 min Fahrtzeit Vom Flughafen: ca. 30 min Fahrtzeit Nehmen Sie die Autobahn A28 Richtung Kampen/Apel- Fahren Sie mit dem Intercity Richtung Groningen, Lelystad doorn/Amersfoort und folgen Sie ihr für 35 km. Nehmen Sie Centrum oder Leeuwarden bis zur Haltestelle Almere Cent- die Ausfahrt 13-Lelystad und biegen rechts ab auf Knardijk/ rum. Dann folgen Sie bitte den obigen Anweisungen. N302. Biegen Sie rechts ab auf die N305 Richtung Lelystad/ Dronten. An der Ampel links abbiegen auf die N302 Rich- Anreise mit dem PKW zur P12 Schoutgarage tung Leystad und auf die A6 Richtung Almere. Nehmen Sie Aus Richtung Amsterdam: ca. 30 min Fahrtzeit die Ausfahrt 6 in Richtung Almere Tussen de Vaarten. Fol- Folgen Sie der A27 Richtung Almere. -
Cesifo Working Paper No. 5385 Category 10: Energy and Climate Economics June 2015
The Green Paradox: A Supply-side View of the Climate Problem Hans-Werner Sinn CESIFO WORKING PAPER NO. 5385 CATEGORY 10: ENERGY AND CLIMATE ECONOMICS JUNE 2015 An electronic version of the paper may be downloaded • from the SSRN website: www.SSRN.com • from the RePEc website: www.RePEc.org • from the CESifo website: www.CESifoT -group.org/wpT ISSN 2364-1428 CESifo Working Paper No. 5385 The Green Paradox: A Supply-side View of the Climate Problem Abstract Why have policies aimed at reducing the demand for carbon not succeeded in slowing down global carbon extraction and CO2 emissions, and why have carbon prices failed to increase over the last three decades? This comment argues that this is because of the Green Paradox, i.e. – (the anticipation of sales by resource owners who try to pre-empt the destruction of their markets by green policies.) – Reviewing some of the conditions under which strong and weak versions of the Green Paradox may emerge, it is argued that there is little hope that green replacement technologies will impose hard price constraints that would keep long-run extraction within a fixed carbon budget and that, therefore, even strong versions of the paradox cannot easily be avoided. JEL-Code: O130, Q320, Q540, H230. Keywords: carbon, environmentalism, back stop, oil prices. Hans-Werner Sinn Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Poschingerstrasse 5 Germany – 81679 Munich [email protected] The climate problem is one of mankind’s biggest challenges. Averting disaster requires nothing less than worldwide collective policy action. -
Dutch Municipalities Are Becoming Greener: Some Political and Institutional Explanations
TI 2017-086/VIII Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper Dutch Municipalities are Becoming Greener: Some Political and Institutional Explanations Raymond (R.H.J.M.) Gradus1 Elbert (E.) Dijkgraaf2 1: School of Business and Economics, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam; Tinbergen Institute, The Netherlands 2: Erasmus Tinbergen Institute is the graduate school and research institute in economics of Erasmus University Rotterdam, the University of Amsterdam and VU University Amsterdam. Contact: [email protected] More TI discussion papers can be downloaded at the Tinbergen Site Tinbergen Institute has two locations: Tinbergen Institute Amsterdam Gustav Mahlerplein 117 1082 MS Amsterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)20 598 4580 Tinbergen Institute Rotterdam Burg. Oudlaan 50 3062 PA Rotterdam The Netherlands Tel.: +31(0)10 408 8900 Dutch municipalities are becoming greener: some political and institutional explanations Raymond Gradus1 and Elbert Dijkgraaf2 Abstract: This paper analyzes whether Dutch municipalities have become greener between 1999 and 2014 by investigating whether they implement different unit-based pricing systems. Based on their incentive, systems are ranged from green (‘weight’) to less green (‘volume’) or no green (‘flat rate’). In one third of the municipalities, shifts took place, with 83 percent becoming greener and 17 percent less greener. Political fragmentation (measured in three ways) plays a key role in explaining these shifts. There is less evidence for political motivation. Particularly, conservative liberals are not in favor of unit-based pricing, whereas social liberals are in favor. In addition, municipalities in rural and shrinking areas are more in favor of unit-based pricing as well Keywords: local government; unit-based waste pricing; (less) greener; ideological motivation 1 Introduction In the Netherlands, Dutch municipalities are responsible for waste collection and separation (Dijkgraaf and Gradus, 2014). -
Snakes in the Greenhouse Does Increased Natural Gas Use Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions from Coal Consumption?
Energy Research & Social Science 38 (2018) 53–57 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Energy Research & Social Science journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/erss Perspectives Snakes in The Greenhouse: Does increased natural gas use reduce carbon T dioxide emissions from coal consumption? ⁎ Patrick Trent Greinera, , Richard Yorka, Julius Alexander McGeeb a University of Oregon, United States b Portland State University, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Since natural gas emits less carbon than does coal per unit of electricity generation, some analysts suggest Natural gas natural gas will help to mitigate climate change. However, sociological research has found that the substitution CO2 emissions of one natural resource for another often does not happen as anticipated because of political and economic Displacement factors. Here, we analyze cross-national time-series data to examine the connection between growth in emissions Energy from natural gas consumption and changes in emissions from coal use, controlling for several structural factors. We find that CO2 emissions from natural gas sources do not displace CO2 emissions from coal. These results cast doubt on whether the growing use of natural gas is likely to help substantially reduce CO2 emissions. 1. Introduction Social science research examining the effectiveness with which newly introduced technologies or resources, such as fuels, displace es- Natural gas produces lower carbon emissions than coal per unit of tablished ones has found that displacement does not typically occur as electricity generation [1]. Citing this fact, some policy-makers, energy expected or intended, if, indeed, it occurs at all. This phenomenon – analysts, and environmental scientists argue that increasing production which has variously been termed the paperless office paradox [12,13] of natural gas will suppress coal use and thereby help to curtail global and the displacement paradox [6,14,15]– has been noted in the failure climate change [2–4]. -
Trias Westland B.V. Nieuweweg 1 2685 AP Poeldijk Leiderdorp, 29 Maart 2021 Oplegger “Geological Report TW OK II” Bijgevoegd
Trias Westland B.V. Nieuweweg 1 2685 AP Poeldijk Leiderdorp, 29 maart 2021 Oplegger “Geological report TW OK II” Bijgevoegd document “Geological report TW OK II”, is in 2018 opgesteld door PanTerra Geoconsultants, ten behoeve van de SDE+ subsidie aanvraag van doublet TW2. Het document omschrijft de geothermische potentie van de toen nog te boren putten NLW-GT-03 en -04. Ten tijde van rapportage was put NLW-GT-01 reeds geboord en getest, put NLW-GT-02 werd geboord. Het geothermische reservoir is de Delft Zandsteen Member. Deze zandsteenlaag maakt deel uit van de Schieland Groep en is het voornaamste geothermische reservoir in de regio. Op basis van seismische interpretatie van de ondergrond en naburige putten werd de diepte van het reservoir ingeschat op circa 2300 tot 2400 m en de bruto dikte circa 55 tot 75 m met een N/G van circa 90%. Gebaseerd op petrofysica en puttesten nabij, waaronder NLW- GT-01, werd de permeabiliteit ingeschat op 650 mD, met een lage inschatting van 450 mD en hoge inschatting van 1000 mD. Het vermogen van het doublet is afhankelijk van geologische parameters, putconfiguratie en operationele instellingen. Op basis van het putontwerp is uitgegaan van een maximum debiet van 525 m3/uur. De benodigde injectiedruk bevindt zich ruim onder de SodM limiet van 0.135 bar/m. Het resulterende P50 vermogen is 32 MW, met een P90 van 25 MW en P10 van 41 MW. De berekende COP (Coefficient Of Performance) range is 13 – 14 – 15 (P90 – P50 -P10). Geological report TW OK II March 2018 PanTerra Project G1363b PanTerra Geoconsultants B.V. -
Handbook of Macroeconomics,Volume2b © 2016 Elsevier B.V
CHAPTER 24 Environmental Macroeconomics J. Hassler*,†,{, P. Krusell*,†,{,§, A.A. Smith, Jr.§,¶ * Institute for International Economic Studies (IIES), Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden †University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden { CEPR, London, United Kingdom § NBER, Cambridge, MA, United States ¶ Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States Contents 1. Introduction 1895 2. Limited Natural Resources and Sustainability Concerns 1899 2.1 Prices and Quantities in Markets for Finite Resources 1901 2.1.1 The Hotelling Result: The Price Equation in a Baseline Case 1901 2.1.2 Prices and Quantities in Equilibrium: Using a Planning Problem 1902 2.1.3 Extraction Costs 1902 2.2 Confronting Theory with Data 1903 2.3 An Application: Fossil Energy 1905 2.3.1 Accounting for Input Saving Using US Data 1906 2.3.2 A Positive Model of Energy Supply and Demand with a Finite Resource 1908 2.3.3 Endogenous Energy-Saving Technical Change 1910 2.3.4 Takeaway from the Fossil-Energy Application 1912 3. Climate Change: The Natural-Science Background 1912 3.1 The Climate 1913 3.1.1 The Energy Budget 1913 3.1.2 Nonlinearities and Uncertainty 1917 3.1.3 Ocean Drag 1918 3.1.4 Global Circulation Models 1920 3.2 Carbon Circulation 1923 3.2.1 Carbon Sinks and Stores 1923 3.2.2 Human Influence on Carbon Circulation 1924 3.2.3 The Reserves of Fossil Fuel 1925 3.2.4 A Linear Carbon Circulation Model 1926 3.2.5 Reduced-Form Depreciation Models 1927 3.2.6 A Linear Relation Between Emissions and Temperature 1928 3.3 Damages 1930 3.3.1 Nordhaus's Approach 1931 3.3.2 Explicit Damage Aggregation 1933 3.3.3 Top-Down Approaches 1934 3.3.4 Remarks 1935 3.3.5 The Operational Approach: A Direct Relation 1937 4. -
Carbon Taxes, Oil Monopoly and Petrodollar Recycling
A Service of Leibniz-Informationszentrum econstor Wirtschaft Leibniz Information Centre Make Your Publications Visible. zbw for Economics Marz, Waldemar; Pfeiffer, Johannes Working Paper Carbon Taxes, Oil Monopoly and Petrodollar Recycling ifo Working Paper, No. 204 Provided in Cooperation with: Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Suggested Citation: Marz, Waldemar; Pfeiffer, Johannes (2015) : Carbon Taxes, Oil Monopoly and Petrodollar Recycling, ifo Working Paper, No. 204, ifo Institute - Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich, Munich This Version is available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10419/123112 Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Documents in EconStor may be saved and copied for your Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden. personal and scholarly purposes. Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle You are not to copy documents for public or commercial Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich purposes, to exhibit the documents publicly, to make them machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen. publicly available on the internet, or to distribute or otherwise use the documents in public. Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, If the documents have been made available under an Open gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort Content Licence (especially Creative Commons Licences), you genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. may exercise further usage rights as specified in the indicated licence. www.econstor.eu Ifo Institute – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich Carbon Taxes, Oil Monopoly and Petrodollar Recycling Waldemar Marz Johannes Pfeiffer Ifo Working Paper No. -
B&B South of Holland
THE NETHERLANDS – HIGHLIGHTS OF SOUTHERN HOLLAND 8-day / 7-night Easy PREMIUM PLUS cycling cruise - Green Heart of Holland, GUIDED or SELF-GUIDED A flat cycling cruise of Southern Holland with many of the icons of the Netherlands, including the windmills at Kinderdijk and Zaanse Schans, a museum celebrating life in the 18th and 19th Centuries, flat green polder landscapes, and fascinating towns and cities. We visit the historical cities of Haarlem and Utrecht, Delft with its famous blue pottery, the ‘cheese town’ of Gouda, Holland’s largest seaport Rotterdam and of course cosmopolitan Amsterdam. The relaxed pace allows for plenty of free time at each day’s destination. This cruise, with easy cycling over flat countryside, is ideal for those considering a cycling holiday for the first time. Bike & Barge cruises combine cycling and river or canal cruising, allowing partners of different abilities to holiday together (non-cyclists are welcome too). Unpack once and come ‘home’ each night to a wonderful meal and a comfortable cabin with your own bathroom. Well-maintained multi-geared bikes and e-bikes are available. Aboard this well-equipped boat the crew have a reputation for hospitality and excellent meals (daily breakfast and three-course dinner are onboard, lunch is a picnic taken from the breakfast buffet). This larger and more spacious boat gives space to relax with comfortable, well-furnished cabins with twin beds and ensuite bathroom. Departs: SELF-GUIDED: Weekly on Saturdays from 28th March to 3rd October 2020 GUIDED: On 2nd, 23rd -
Gezonde Omgeving Flevoland Almere
GEZONDE OMGEVING FLEVOLAND ALMERE GEWICHT HOEVEELHEID GROEN 54% 53% groen anders % ondergewicht gezond gewicht overgewicht ernstig overgewicht Almere Flevoland 46% 46% 74% 78% Almere Flevoland ALCOHOL Almere 5% 6% Flevoland Drinkt alcohol Zware drinker MANTELZORG 17% 18% & VRIJWILLIGERSWERK ROKEN Almere Flevoland 2% 3% Almere 28% Flevoland Roker Zware roker 20% 15% 14% ANGST & DEPRESSIE hoog risico minder risico % Geeft mantelzorg Doet vrijwilligerswerk 10% 8% Almere Flevoland GELUIDSHINDER Ervaren geluidshinder (% matig - ernstig) BEWEGING Almere voldoende onvoldoende % Flevoland 24% verkeer <= 50 km 20% 45% 16% Almere verkeer > 50 km/u 14% 46% 10% treinverkeer 7% Flevoland 21% vliegverkeer 17% 29% brommers/scooters 27% 31% buren 27% GGD006 Infographic Leefomgeving 2019-06-18 GEZONDE OMGEVING FLEVOLAND “GGD Flevoland zet zich in voor GGD Flevoland adviseert gemeenten en organisaties over gezondheidsaspecten en een kwalitatief goede, veilige en mogelijke maatregelen bij planvorming, beleid en keuze van activiteiten. gezondere leefomgeving, die de inwoners van Flevoland uitnodigt tot Dit overzicht is een weergave van een aantal gezondheidsaspecten van de Flevolandse gezond gedrag en beschermt tegen inwoners en een aantal maatregelen die een positief effect op hun gezondheid kan hebben. gezondheidsrisico’s. ” Almere, Dronten, Lelystad, Noordoostpolder, Urk en Zeewolde zijn de zes gemeenten Een gezonde leefomgeving wordt bepaald door van Flevoland. Op 1 januari 2019 telt de provincie Flevoland 416.431 inwoners. Almere de invloed van milieuaspecten (lucht, geluid) is met 207.819 de grootste gemeente. en de fysieke en sociale leefomgeving die als prettig worden ervaren op gebied van veiligheid, Gebruikte Bronnen: RIVM www.loketgezondleven.nl februari 2019 / Centraal bureau voor de statistiek / www. gezondheid en deelname aan de samenleving. -
THE GREEN PARADOX Rates Must Be Slowed Down
Introductory Debate THE GREEN PARADOX rates must be slowed down. The resource owners must be prompted to temporarily leave more carbon underground. HANS-WERNER SINN Professor of Economics and Public Finance, Those convinced that with the brave new technolo- University of Munich; gies proudly displayed in many newspapers’ spe- President of the Ifo Institute for Economic Research cial sections we can avert climate change should specify how they would move resource owners to Environmental policy must be turned on its head: extract less fossil fuel. And that is precisely the instead of mulling over for the thousandth time about sticking point. Politics so far exhibits not the slight- which technical measures can be applied to reduce est glimmer of thinking in this direction. From the carbon dioxide emissions, we should turn to the core Environmental Agency through the Greens to the question of how to induce the resource owners to relevant European Commission there is not a thing leave more carbon underground, as that is the sole on the matter. Even science itself overlooks the possible way to solve the climate problem. issue. Energy models depicting the long-term extraction path of fossil fuel resources do not con- The simple but usually overlooked fact is: other than cern themselves with the climate. Climate-theoret- the useful but limited afforestation efforts, there are ical models, in turn, do not concern themselves only two ways to curb the accumulation of carbon with the extraction of such resources; they are in dioxide in the atmosphere and, with it, slow down fact atemporal models that, by their very nature, global warming. -
Fact Sheet Alblasserdam
Fact sheet Alblasserdam Location map of the Alblasserdam oil field Fact sheet Alblasserdam Q4 2009 General information The Alblasserdam oil field was discovered in 1959 by NAM by well Alblasserdam-01. The field contains oil (stacked) reservoirs of the Delfland. The oil field is situated 15 kilomters east of Rotterdam, on the boundary of the West Netherlands Basin and the Roer Valley Graben. The well is tested at several reservoir levels in de Delfland Subgroup. The field is not producing and currently situated in the Rijswijk concession of NAM. Regional information on the geology, including sedimentology and the structural configuration, of the area is available in map sheet VII-VIII Noordwijk-Rotterdam, Amsterdam-Gorinchem. Sequence of events Date Event 03-01-1955 Production license Rijswijk granted (NAM) 20-03-1957 Production license area expanded with ca 1900 km 2 (NAM) 17-07-1957 Spud date Alblasserdam-01 (NAM) 02-08-1957 / 18-08-1957 DST’s (674 -707; 1464.8-1475m ah) 07-09-1957 TD reached (1650 m ah) 07-06-1979 Production license area expanded with ca 25 km 2 (NAM) Plug data Depth Porosity Horizontal permeability Grain density m ah % mD g/cm 3 1463 12 2.68 1463.4 19 11 2.68 1463.6 25 115 2.66 1464 12 2.69 1464.3 29 2979 2.66 1464.6 38 2932 2.7 1465 28 5339 2.65 1469.3 7 1 2.68 1542.5 27 1188 2.64 1543.2 21 290 2.67 1543.5 25 2.64 1544 28 875 2.64 1544.4 16 2.64 1628 6 2.71 Further plug data is available (also 657,5 – 1374,4 m ah). -
Onteigening in De Gemeenten Zwijndrecht, Hendrik- Ido-Ambacht, Alblasserdam, Graafstroom En Papendrecht
Onteigening in de gemeenten Zwijndrecht, Hendrik- Ido-Ambacht, Alblasserdam, Graafstroom en Papendrecht VW «Onteigeningswet» de personen mondeling hun zienswijze Bentum Recycling Centrale B.V., eige- naar voren hebben gebracht, al dan nares van de onroerende zaken met de Aanleg Betuweroute niet vergezeld van een schriftelijke grondplannummers 4087 en 4088; zienswijze: 9. het Drechtsteden Ziekenhuis, mede Besluit van 12 januari 1999, nr. tijdens de zitting in de gemeente namens de Stichting voor Christelijke 99.000062 houdende aanwijzing van Alblasserdam: Ziekenverpleging voor Dordrecht, onroerende zaken ter onteigening ten 1. de heren H.A. Schrier en L. Jansen, Zwijndrecht en Omstreken, eigenares algemenen nutte eigenaren van de onroerende zaken van de onroerende zaken met de met de grondplannummers 4095 en grondplannummers 4190 en 4191; Wij Beatrix, bij de Gratie Gods, 6221, mede namens G.A. Jansen Auto 10. mevrouw drs J.E.R. Trapman Koningin der Nederlanden, Prinses van B.V.; namens mevrouw G.G.A. Bringold- Oranje-Nassau, enz. enz. enz. tijdens de zitting in de gemeente Visser, eigenares van de onroerende Beschikken bij dit besluit over het ver- Zwijndrecht: zaak met het grondplannummer 4161; zoek van de directeur van NS 2. de heer W.A.C. Sollewijn Gelpke 11. de heer J. de Graaf, voormalig eige- Railinfrabeheer B.V. van 19 februari namens René Clerx Beheer o.g. beheer naar van de onroerende zaken met de 1998, kenmerk B.V., mede namens ABN Amro grondplannummers 6213, 6215 en GJZ/2C/BER/93.268/U98.0237, tot aan- Projectontwikkeling B.V., groepslid van 6216; wijzing van onroerende zaken ter ont- de v.o.f.