“Money Will Be Made”: Relativity Media and Hollywood’S Relationship with Wall Street

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

“Money Will Be Made”: Relativity Media and Hollywood’S Relationship with Wall Street Kimberly A. Owczarski, Ph.D. “Money Will Be Made”: Relativity Media and Hollywood’s Relationship with Wall Street Abstract Although the last three decades has been rife with the collapse of high-profile independents from Orion to Miramax, Relativity Media’s journey from financer to producer and distributor to bankruptcy in just eleven short years was a bit different than other independents. This essay examines Relativity’s status as a mini-major film studio, what factors led to its ascent, and the situations which led to its subsequent demise. Chief in this examination is Ryan Kavanaugh’s role in Relativity—as founder and chief executive officer, his position was vital in shaping both the successes and the failures of the firm. Indeed, the breakdown of Relativity ultimately demonstrates the challenges facing independent studios navigating the contemporary media environment as the Hollywood majors continue to consolidate their power in the industry. On July 30, 2015, lawyers for Relativity Media filed companies in a system that typically finds success for bankruptcy protection in a U.S. court. Despite through big-budget projects. a successful track record of releases that included Relativity entered the competitive film the big-budget action filmImmortals (2011) and market as economic conditions shifted in the Oscar winner The Fighter(2010), Relativity’s industry towards new finance models, a trait it dependence upon Wall Street investment coupled shares with many independent film companies with institutional overspending contributed to that have grown to prominence in the last few the company’s financial woes, especially after a decades. In the late 1960s and 1970s, the change series of underperforming films at the box office. of ownership in several of the major studios for As Relativity seemed poised for disintegration, the first time in their histories created instability much of the firm’s problems were attributed to the in the film market. Under different management company’s founder and chief executive officer, Ryan styles, the studios were forced to find novel ways Kavanaugh. Because Kavanaugh had a successful to become more profitable. The record-breaking track record of bridging Wall Street investment success of Universal’s Jaws in 1975 and 20th with Hollywood filmmaking in the earliest years Century Fox’s Star Wars in 1977 at the box office of Relativity—he had brokered deals with majors and in merchandize sales demonstrated the type Warner Bros., Universal, and Sony, among others— of texts that would increase profit margins for the the bankruptcy status seemed incongruous. Despite studios. Historically, studio financing has relied his investment accomplishments, Kavanaugh had on “a combination of self-supplied equity and wanted a more active role in the development film-specific bank lending.”1 Blockbuster films and creation of films. In running his own studio, particularly benefit studios because they guarantee Kavanaugh’s financial strategies were constantly income from various media forms, a necessity for questioned, especially in Relativity’s improbable studio financial stability and to secure large loans. rise and its subsequent descent into bankruptcy While blockbuster films could financially impact all in just eleven short years. Indeed, Relativity’s arms of the growing media companies, they came at collapse demonstrates the challenges facing nascent a high cost due to their production and marketing 50 The System Beyond the Studios Luci Marzola, editor, Spectator 38:2 (Fall 2018): 50-59. OWCZARSKI budgets. Studios thus reduced their output sig- throughout the 1980s and entered into financing nificantly to focus primarily on blockbusters. As and production, but its skillful release of the award- a result, the number of independent production winning sex, lies and videotape (1989) placed the companies has grown in recent decades in order to company at the forefront of independent film. take advantage of the holes left by the studios, both Miramax marketed the film to both arthouse and in terms of the number of films released as well as youth audiences, and exhibited the film in both the type of films produced. the small theaters catering to art film enthusiasts As the studios shifted their focus from and in multiplexes across the country. Alisa Perren large slates to big-budgeted blockbusters, several terms independent films that replicate aspects of independent film companies emerged to fill in the studio blockbusters (albeit on a smaller scale) as the gaps, chief among them Orion and Miramax. indie blockbusters, a hybridized genre that Miramax The cases of Orion of Miramax are instructive excelled at producing throughout the 1990s.3 comparisons for what would later happen with From the star-filled cast of Pulp Fiction (1994) to Relativity. Orion was founded in 1978 after several the high-budget period piece The English Patient top executives left United Artists due to disputes (1996), these films were critically lauded. By 1993, with Transamerica, the studio’s parent company Miramax’s track record was so strong that Disney, whose primary business was insurance. With the looking to expand its film holdings, purchased the reputation of these former studio executives, Orion company. With the infusion of corporate capital, the quickly procured a distribution and financing production and marketing budgets of Miramax’s deal with Warner Bros. which gave the fledgling films drastically increased. These expenditures led 2 company relative autonomy. The primary focus of to conflicts with Disney executives, especially as Orion was generating moderate success at the box several of these ventures failed to recoup costs. The office, with the potential for more revenue in the Weinsteins left the company they founded in 2005, emerging new media markets of VHS sales and and Disney let the division’s slate lapse, producing cable television licensing. This strategy initially only a couple of films a year until ultimately selling proved successful and based on its track record, Miramax in 2010. Orion was able to secure a much higher credit line in Although the last three decades has been rife 1985. As a result of the finance influx, the company with the collapse of high-profile independents like increased project budgets. The major studios had Orion and Miramax, Relativity Media’s history largely abandoned mid-range budgeted pictures was a bit different than these other film companies. to focus on blockbusters, and Orion was finding Its direct ties to Wall Street investment gave the success in that milieu with films like the Academy company access to large amounts of capital from the Award-winning Platoon (1986). However, as the start, limiting Relativity’s financial risk in potential production and marketing budgets quickly climbed projects. As a multimedia company stretching from for its films, Orion did not have the safety nets that music to television, and from fashion to sports, the majors did—extensive libraries of product going Relativity had multiple modes of revenue besides back decades, corporate capital, or even multiple its film studio. At the time of the bankruptcy media arms. As several mid-range pictures flopped, announcement, Relativity had a lucrative Netflix Orion’s executives were forced to file for bankruptcy in 1991, and the company ceased to function as a deal in place as well as dozens of output deals around production studio. the globe that helped finance upcoming films. The While Orion functioned as one of the largest company had established key relationships with independent studios for much of the 1980s, Universal Studios and Broadway Video (Lorne Miramax was central to shaping independent Michaels’ entertainment studio) among others to film in the 1990s. Founded a year after Orion by produce high-profile projects. There was no shortage brothers Harvey and Bob Weinstein, the key focus of press coverage of the company or of Kavanaugh, of Miramax in its earliest years was distributing who was named Showman of the Year by industry concert and foreign films to college campuses trade Variety in 2011.4 And yet, the company still and smaller art theaters. The company grew collapsed despite its various assets and strengths. THE SYSTEM BEYOND THE STUDIOS 51 “MONEY WILL BE MADE” As Relativity moved from a support institution the firm lost millions of dollars and was defunct to a mini-major (an independent company by 2002. Despite the firm’s failure and lawsuits competing with the major Hollywood studios), the from key investors in KC Capital, Kavanaugh was role of Wall Street capital significantly changed for able to launch Relativity Management in 2004 to the firm. In this essay, I examine Relativity’s status focus specifically on the film business. Between as a mini-major film studio, what factors led to its his Hollywood contacts and his background in ascent, and the situations which led to its subsequent venture capital, Kavanaugh leveraged Relativity demise. Chief in this examination is Kavanaugh’s Management as a key broker between Wall Street role in Relativity; as founder and chief executive investment and the studios. officer, his position was vital in shaping the firm. Relativity Management emerged in the midst Kavanaugh’s approach to financing was that “You of a shift in Hollywood from studio equity and can’t think of it as money….You have to think of it picture-specific bank loans towards slate financing, as math,” and was based on the insistence that all where outside investors backed several films in a films can be profitable, even if the revenues were in studio’s upcoming release schedule.7 Between 2005 smaller quantities than the Hollywood studios are and 2008, over $4 billion of hedge fund investment used to seeing.5 By focusing on the gaps left by the backed studio picture slates while another $8 studios’ slates, Relativity would be able to carve out billion was raised via private equity firms.8 Slate its existence in the competitive film landscape and financing deals offered several advantages.
Recommended publications
  • Pr-Dvd-Holdings-As-Of-September-18
    CALL # LOCATION TITLE AUTHOR BINGE BOX COMEDIES prmnd Comedies binge box (includes Airplane! --Ferris Bueller's Day Off --The First Wives Club --Happy Gilmore)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX CONCERTS AND MUSICIANSprmnd Concerts and musicians binge box (Includes Brad Paisley: Life Amplified Live Tour, Live from WV --Close to You: Remembering the Carpenters --John Sebastian Presents Folk Rewind: My Music --Roy Orbison and Friends: Black and White Night)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX MUSICALS prmnd Musicals binge box (includes Mamma Mia! --Moulin Rouge --Rodgers and Hammerstein's Cinderella [DVD] --West Side Story) [videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. BINGE BOX ROMANTIC COMEDIESprmnd Romantic comedies binge box (includes Hitch --P.S. I Love You --The Wedding Date --While You Were Sleeping)[videorecording] / Princeton Public Library. DVD 001.942 ALI DISC 1-3 prmdv Aliens, abductions & extraordinary sightings [videorecording]. DVD 001.942 BES prmdv Best of ancient aliens [videorecording] / A&E Television Networks History executive producer, Kevin Burns. DVD 004.09 CRE prmdv The creation of the computer [videorecording] / executive producer, Bob Jaffe written and produced by Donald Sellers created by Bruce Nash History channel executive producers, Charlie Maday, Gerald W. Abrams Jaffe Productions Hearst Entertainment Television in association with the History Channel. DVD 133.3 UNE DISC 1-2 prmdv The unexplained [videorecording] / produced by Towers Productions, Inc. for A&E Network executive producer, Michael Cascio. DVD 158.2 WEL prmdv We'll meet again [videorecording] / producers, Simon Harries [and three others] director, Ashok Prasad [and five others]. DVD 158.2 WEL prmdv We'll meet again. Season 2 [videorecording] / director, Luc Tremoulet producer, Page Shepherd.
    [Show full text]
  • Brokeback Mountain'' and the Oscars I Lesbijek
    ''Americans Don't Want Cowboys to Be Gay:'' Amerykanów, nawet wśród najbardziej liberalnych heteroseksualnych popleczników równouprawnienia gejów ''Brokeback Mountain'' and the Oscars i lesbijek. ______________________ William Glass When Crash (2005) was the surprise best picture winner at the 2006 Oscar ceremony, a variety of explanations were offered for the ("Amerykanie nie chcą kowbojów-gejów". "Brokeback Moutain" upset over the pre-Oscar favorite, Brokeback Mountain (2005). i Oskary) Some suggested a Brokeback backlash occurred; that is, that Brokeback Mountain, which had won critical praise and awards from STRESZCZENIE: Kiedy w 2006 roku Crash zdobył the time of its release and was the highest grossing picture of the five niespodziewanie Oskara za najlepszy film roku, pojawiło się wiele nominated, had worn out its welcome with the Academy voters. prób wyjaśnienia porażki, jaką poniósł przedoskarowy faworyt, Others argued that the Academy got it right: Crash was the superior Brokeback Mountain. Celem tego eseju nie jest porównanie film. A few mentioned the massive marketing campaign by the walorów artystycznych tych dwóch filmów, ani też ustalenie, czy studio on behalf of Crash, swamping the members of the Academy odrzucenie obrazu Brokeback Mountain przez Akademię with free copies of the DVD. Another popular explanation was that motywowane było ukrytą homofobią, ale raczej odpowiedź na since Crash was set in Los Angeles and since most Academy pytanie, czego można dowiedzieć się o powszechnych postawach members live in Los Angeles, the voters chose the movie that i wyobrażeniach dotyczących miejsca gejów i lesbijek reflected their experiences.[1] Larry McMurtry, one of the w społeczeństwie amerykańskim na podstawie dyskusji na temat screenwriters for Brokeback Mountain, offered two of the more zwycięstwa filmu Crash, która toczyła się w Internecie, na blogach insightful explanations, both of which turned on prejudice.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Land of Blood and Honey What’S Fair Or Just in Love and War Crimes? Lessons for Transitional Justice* Carrie Menkel-Meadow
    4 In The Land of Blood and Honey What’s Fair or Just in Love and War Crimes? Lessons for Transitional Justice* Carrie Menkel-Meadow n 1990, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) held a conference on “Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the IFinal Solution” during which leading international scholars of history, literature, cultural studies, philosophy, critical theory, arts, language, sociology, and psychology explored the question of whether the mass atrocities of Nazism and the Final Solution to exterminate all European Jewry could be represented in anything other than “factual” historical documentation and narrative (Friedlander 1992; White 1992; LaCapra 1996). This was some years after the first documentaries and “fictional- ized” films on the Holocaust had appeared, after Judgment at Nuremberg (Kramer 1961), but before Schindler’s List (Spielberg 1993) and after vari- ous cultural critics had said such things as “there can be no poetry after Auschwitz” (attributed to Theodor Adorno), and no morally acceptable artistic representation could be made of the Shoah (Friedlander 1992). The conference explored what were then called “limits to representation” of certain “truths,” so reprehensible, so mass and, at the same time, so spe- cific or so exceptional (the “German” problem; Maier 1988), that no genre could fully, morally, or “accurately” depict either the systematic evil or the mass pain, death, and injury that is the Holocaust. As the child of Holocaust survivors, I attended that conference as both scholar and one generation removed “victim,” having spent a lifetime listening to my family’s stories and seeing many visual images of both their own stories and the larger international one that was World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 Movie Catalog © Warner Bros
    1-800-876-5577 www.swank.com Swank Motion Pictures,Inc. Swank Motion 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie © Warner Bros. © 2013 Disney © TriStar Pictures © Warner Bros. © NBC Universal © Columbia Pictures Industries, ©Inc. Summit Entertainment 2013 Movie Catalog Movie 2013 Inc. Pictures, Motion Swank 1-800-876-5577 www.swank.com MOVIES Swank Motion Pictures,Inc. Swank Motion 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie © New Line Cinema © 2013 Disney © Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc. © Warner Bros. © 2013 Disney/Pixar © Summit Entertainment Promote Your movie event! Ask about FREE promotional materials to help make your next movie event a success! 2013 Movie Catalog 2013 Movie Catalog TABLE OF CONTENTS New Releases ......................................................... 1-34 Swank has rights to the largest collection of movies from the top Coming Soon .............................................................35 Hollywood & independent studios. Whether it’s blockbuster movies, All Time Favorites .............................................36-39 action and suspense, comedies or classic films,Swank has them all! Event Calendar .........................................................40 Sat., June 16th - 8:00pm Classics ...................................................................41-42 Disney 2012 © Date Night ........................................................... 43-44 TABLE TENT Sat., June 16th - 8:00pm TM & © Marvel & Subs 1-800-876-5577 | www.swank.com Environmental Films .............................................. 45 FLYER Faith-Based
    [Show full text]
  • Cinedigm Corp. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) ______
    Dear Stockholders, Cinedigm put together a remarkable series of accomplishments over the last fiscal year, completing the Company’s business transformation by solidifying our unique position as a key player in the explosively growing OTT/streaming business. Here’s what we accomplished this year: First, we developed several new streaming channels including Comedy Dynamics and The Bob Ross Channel to build our portfolio to 16 premium streaming channels either launched or under contract to launch. We will soon be at 20 channels and plan to get to 30 in the next 18 months. This gives Cinedigm a large, meaningful and growing channel share on the program guide for every key streaming platform and device. Most of these new channels will be set up in a similar fashion to our recent Bob Ross, All 3 Media,, Team Whistle and LiveXLive channel deals, where we partnered with established branded entertainment companies that bring huge amounts of content to the table and then we operate and launch with our major distribution partners like Roku, Amazon, Tubi, and Samsung. We have a robust deal pipeline of these potential premium new partners and channels now because we have clearly established Cinedigm as the “go to” independent streaming company that can employ our state-of-the-art proprietary Matchpoint technology, an enormous streaming distribution platform and device reach, and a huge digital content library to help launch streaming channels across the entire OTT ecosystem. We can do all that quickly, cost effectively and with almost ubiquitous distribution potential on every device and platform. The quality of the business partners reflected in our new channel deals clearly demonstrates that the entertainment industry understands the advantages of doing business with Cinedigm in the exploding streaming space.
    [Show full text]
  • Becoming Legendary: Slate Financing and Hollywood Studio Partnership in Contemporary Filmmaking
    Kimberly Owczarski Becoming Legendary: Slate Financing and Hollywood Studio Partnership in Contemporary Filmmaking In June 2005, Warner Bros. Pictures announced Are Marshall (2006), and Trick ‘r’ Treat (2006)2— a multi-film co-financing and co-production not a single one grossed more than $75 million agreement with Legendary Pictures, a new total worldwide at the box office. In 2007, though, company backed by $500 million in private 300 was a surprise hit at the box office and secured equity funding from corporate investors including Legendary’s footing in Hollywood (see Table 1 divisions of Bank of America and AIG.1 Slate for a breakdown of Legendary’s performance at financing, which involves an investment in a the box office). Since then, Legendary has been a specified number of studio films ranging from a partner on several high-profile Warner Bros. films mere handful to dozens of pictures, was hardly a including The Dark Knight, Inception, Watchmen, new phenomenon in Hollywood as several studios Clash of the Titans, and The Hangoverand its sequel. had these types of deals in place by 2005. But In an interview with the Wall Street Journal, the sheer size of the Legendary deal—twenty five Legendary founder Thomas Tull likened his films—was certainly ambitious for a nascent firm. company’s involvement in film production to The first film released as part of this deal wasBatman an entrepreneurial endeavor, stating: “We treat Begins (2005), a rebooting of Warner Bros.’ film each film like a start-up.”3 Tull’s equation of franchise. Although Batman Begins had a strong filmmaking with Wall Street investment is performance at the box office ($205 million in particularly apt, as each film poses the potential domestic theaters and $167 million in international for a great windfall or loss just as investing in a theaters), it was not until two years later that the new business enterprise does for stockholders.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRACT CONFLICT Guy A
    COPYRIGHT © 2017 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT SURVIVES: RETHINKING THE COPYRIGHT- CONTRACT CONFLICT Guy A. Rub* Twenty-one years ago, copyright died. More accurately, it was killed. In 1996, in ProCD v. Zeidenberg, Judge Easterbrook, writing for the Seventh Circuit, held that a contract that restricted the use of factual information was not preempted by the Copyright Act and therefore enforceable. The reaction among copyright scholars was swift and passionate. In dozens of articles and books, spreading over two decades, scholars cautioned that if the ProCD approach is broadly adopted, the results would be dire. Through contracts, the rights of copyright owners would run amok, expand, and in doing so they would invade, shrink, and possibly destroy the public domain. Contracts, we were repeatedly warned throughout the years, would kill copyright law. This Article challenges this scholarly consensus by studying the court opinions that have dealt with the copyright-contract conflict over the past four decades. This examination reveals surprising facts: notwithstanding the scholars’ warnings, ProCD’s approach won the day and was embraced by most federal circuit courts. The doomsday scenarios scholars warned against, however, did not materialize. The * Associate Professor, The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law. I would like to thank Professors Clark Asay, Ian Ayres, Jonathan Baker, Scott Baker, Omri Ben-Shahar, Robert Brauneis, Wendy Gordon, David Hoffman, Robert Merges, Mark McKenna, Alan Michaels, Michael
    [Show full text]
  • ICN 2020 Virtual Annual Conference Day
    KnowledgeVision | ICN 2020 Day One Sept 14 CYNTHIA: Welcome to ICN 2020. We are delighted that you are joining us this week for the ICN Annual Conference. Today through Wednesday, we'll see two plenary discussions and related working group videos each day. On Thursday, we have special programming on ICN work related to NGAs, younger agencies, and economists. Each day you'll find the link to these session posted on the conference web page, just like you did today. If you have questions, suggestions, or just want to let us know that you're tuning in, you can email us at [email protected] and [email protected]. Follow ICN on Twitter. This week using the special hashtag ICN2020. And now it is my great pleasure to turn it over to [INAUDIBLE] president and ICN chair Andreas Mundt. ANDREAS Thanks a lot, Cynthia. Well, welcome to the 2020 ICN Annual Conference, a MUNDT: meeting of members of the ICN of our non-governmental advisors and many other people this time, because we take a chance and have more attendees than ever probably. We have four conference days ahead of us. We're going to have a host showcase. There will be working group plenaries. There will be special sessions for younger agencies for our non-governmental advisors for economists, and there will be a follow up program after the conference that will be organized by the working groups. There will be weekly events. Well, this is our first virtual conference. A virtual organization like the ICN and a virtual conference sounds easy, but in fact, it was hard to do that, to set up the program adjusted to the virtual world.
    [Show full text]
  • Motion Picture License List of MPL Participating Theatrical Distributors & Producers
    Motion Picture License List of MPL Participating Theatrical Distributors & Producers MAJOR HOLLYWOOD STUDIOS & AFFILIATED LABELS 20th Century Studios Paramount Pictures (f/k/a Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.) Paramount Vantage Buena Vista Pictures Picturehouse Cannon Pictures Pixar Animation Studios Columbia Pictures Polygram Filmed Entertainment Dreamworks Animation SKG Republic Pictures Dreamworks Pictures RKO Pictures (Releases 2011 to present) Screen Gems PLEASE CHOOSE Dreamworks Pictures CATEGORY: (Releases prior to 2011) Searchlight Pictures (f/ka/a Fox Searchlight Pictures) Fine Line Features Sony Pictures Entertainment Focus Features Major Hollywood Studios STX Entertainment & Affiliated Labels Fox - Walden Touchstone Pictures Fox 2000 Films TV Tristar Pictures Fox Look Triumph Films Independent Hanna-Barbera United Artists Pictures Hollywood Pictures Faith-Based Universal Pictures Lionsgate Entertainment USA Films Lorimar Telepictures Children’s Walt Disney Pictures Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer (MGM) Studios Warner Bros. Pictures Spanish Language New Line Cinema Warner Bros. Television Nickelodeon Movies Foreign & International Warner Horizon Television Orion Pictures Warner Independent Pictures Paramount Classics TV 41 Entertaiment LLC Ditial Lifestyle Studios A&E Networks Productions DIY Netowrk Productions Abso Lutely Productions East West Documentaries Ltd Agatha Christie Productions Elle Driver Al Dakheel Inc Emporium Productions Alcon Television Endor Productions All-In-Production Gmbh Fabrik Entertainment Ambi Exclusive Acquisitions
    [Show full text]
  • Cashier Du Cinema
    PROFILES CASHIER DU CINEMA After supermarkets, private equity, and politics, Ron Burkle makes a move on Hollywood. BY CONNIE BRUCK nside the towering iron gates of Green don’t want to think you’re in L.A., you’re Around that time, Burkle was seen at an Acres, a Beverly Hills estate built in not really in L.A.” L.A. night club, with “two drop-dead- theI nineteen-twenties by the silent-film Burkle turned Green Acres into the gorgeous girls, maybe twenty years old, actor Harold Lloyd, a narrow road climbs city’s premier political showcase. Shortly one on either arm,” a person who was at through eight acres of lawns and gardens after buying the estate, he hosted a fund- the club said. “It was such a statement: to a mansion modelled on the Villa Pal- raiser for Senator Dianne Feinstein, I can do whatever I want.” The New mieri, the Florentine palazzo where Boc- whose campaign he served as a finance York Post ran items about Burkle carous- caccio set the “Decameron.” One after- chair. The next year, he met Bill Clinton, ing with young models on his plane, noon in mid-June, the courtyard held a who was running for President, and the which had customized sleeping quarters. dozen gleaming sports cars—Lambor- two found a ready kinship. Although (Burkle, working with an F.B.I. sting, se- ghinis, Teslas, Ferraris, McLarens—ar- Burkle was a registered Republican until cretly videotaped the Post columnist ranged in a circular design, like giant steel 2004, by the mid-nineties he had be- Jared Paul Stern asking him for money petals.
    [Show full text]
  • DANIEL CLANCY Production Designer Danielbclancydesign.Com
    DANIEL CLANCY Production Designer danielbclancydesign.com PROJECTS Partial List DIRECTORS STUDIOS/PRODUCERS 61ST STREET Various Directors BBC / AMC Limited Series Steph Accetta, Jeff Freilich Peter Moffat ORDINARY JOE Adam Davidson 20TH CENTURY FOX TV / NBC Pilot Jason Roberts, Craig Hill NEXT Glenn Ficarra 20TH CENTURY FOX TV Pilot & Season 1 John Requa Sean Williamson PROVEN INNOCENT Various Directors 20TH CENTURY FOX TV Season 1 Jane Bartelme, Craig Hill AN ACCEPTABLE LOSS Joe Chappelle CORRADO MOONCOIN Feature Film PRODUCTIONS Colleen Griffen CONTROVERSY John Requa 20TH CENTURY FOX TV Pilot Glenn Ficarra Jane Bartelme, Charlie Gogolak CHICAGO JUSTICE Various Directors DICK WOLF Season 1 UNIVERSAL TELEVISION Carla Corwin Michael Chernuchin AMERICAN PASTORAL Ewan McGregor LAKESHORE ENTERTAINMENT Feature Film Andre Lamal, Zane Weiner I AM WRATH Chuck Russell PATRIOT FILMS Feature Film Rich Cowan THE HOLLARS John Krasinski SYCAMORE PICTURES Feature Film Allyson Seeger FATHERS AND DAUGHTERS Gabriele Muccino VOLTAGE PICTURES Feature Film RIchard Middleton DOUBT Thomas Schamme SONY PICTURES TELEVISION Pilot ABC Gerrit van der Meer THE MOB DOCTOR Various Directors FOX TELEVISION Season 1 Iain Paterson PROMISED LAND Gus Van Sant FOCUS FEATURES Feature Film Ron Schmidt BOSS Gus Van Sant LIONSGATE / STARZ Pilot & Season 1 Farhad Safinia SO UNDERCOVER Thomas Vaughan EXCLUSIVE MEDIA Feature Film Steven Pearl, Alan Loeb THE DILEMMA Ron Howard IMAGINE Feature Film UNIVERSAL PICTURES Todd Hallowell, Brian Grazer NOTHING LIKE THE HOLIDAYS Alfredo DeVilla OVERTURE FILMS Feature Film Bob Teitel Mr. Clancy is local in Chicago. INNOVATIVE-PRODUCTION.COM | 310.656.5151 .
    [Show full text]
  • Descarga Completa
    La presencia del cine español en el mercado internacional Autor principal: Antonio Saura Estudio de caso: Raúl de Mora Jiménez Documento de Trabajo 03/2010 GOBIERNO MINISTERIO DE ESPAÑA DE CULTURA Antonio Saura Es socio fundador de Zebra Producciones. Productor de cine y televisión. Licenciado en Geografía e Historia por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Máster en “Fine Arts" en cine por la Columbia University New York y dos veces Fulbright. Fundador de Media Business School. Actualmente es miembro del Consejo de Dirección de la Academia de Cine Europea y ejerce actividades docentes. Raúl de Mora Jiménez Es doctor en Comunicación Audiovisual y Publicidad por la Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Máster en Gestión de la Comunicación por la Universidad del Sur de California. Sus investigaciones se centran en la coopera- ción audiovisual y las relaciones entre comunicación y desarrollo, principalmente en América Latina. Ninguna parte ni la totalidad de este documento puede ser repro du cida, grabada o transmitida en forma alguna ni por cualquier pro ce di miento, ya sea electrónico, mecánico, reprográfico, magnético o cual quier otro, sin autorización previa y por escrito de la Fundación Al ternativas. © Fundación Alternativas © Antonio Saura y Raúl de Mora Jiménez ISBN: 978-84-92957-14-9 Depósito Legal: M-17472-2010 Impreso en papel ecológico 2 Índice 1. Introducción 5 2. Tipología de la producción española 9 3. Los mecanismos del mercado internacional 15 3.1 Los mercados de cine 22 3.2 Las muestras de cine nacionales o screenings 25 3.3 Derechos en venta 27 4. El cine español fuera de nuestras fronteras 29 4.1 Debilidades: el cine de los grandes estudios americanos y el resto del mercado 29 4.2 Amenazas: nuestros rivales.
    [Show full text]