DOCSLIB.ORG

Nabet-Abc Master Agreement

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Nabet-Abc Master Agreement NABET-CWA/ABC Inc. 2017-2021 Master Agreement MASTER AGREEMENT TABLE OF CONTENTS General Articles Article I. Recognition and Warranty ............................................................... 2 II. No Discrimination ........................................................................... 2 III. Employment ..................................................................................... 3 IV. Check-Off ........................................................................................ 7 V. No Strikes or Lockouts .................................................................... 9 VI. Transfer of Work ............................................................................. 9 VII. Program Origination ...................................................................... 10 VIII. Work Schedule, Overtime and Penalties ....................................... 15 IX. Meal Periods .................................................................................. 22 X. Night Shift Differential .................................................................. 22 XI. Seniority, Layoffs and Rehires ...................................................... 23 XII. Transfers, Training and Temporary Upgrading ............................. 31 XIII. Leave of Absence .......................................................................... 33 XIV. Discharges ...................................................................................... 35 XV. Severance Pay ................................................................................ 38 XVI. Travel Time ................................................................................... 38 XVII. Use of Employee’s Car .................................................................. 43 XVIII. Holidays ......................................................................................... 44 XIX. Vacations ....................................................................................... 46 XX. Grievances and Arbitration ............................................................ 52 XXI. Safety Committee .......................................................................... 58 XXII. Insurance ........................................................................................ 59 XXIII. Retirement Plan ............................................................................. 62 XXIV. On-Camera Appearances ............................................................... 64 XXV. Local Quarterly Meetings .............................................................. 65 XXVI. Sick Leave ..................................................................................... 66 XXVII. Tuition Contribution ...................................................................... 70 XXVIII. Savings and Investment Plan ......................................................... 71 XXIX. Dental Expense Insurance Program ............................................... 71 XXX. Term of Agreement ........................................................................ 71 ii Individual Articles Article A. Engineering Agreement ............................................................................... 73 A-I Scope of Unit ................................................................ 73 A-II Technical Equipment and Jurisdiction ......................... 73 A-III Classifications and Wage Scales ................................. 94 A-IV Technical Director and Technical Lighting ................. 98 A-V Issuance of Work Assignments ................................... 99 A-VI Sound Effects - Chicago and Los Angeles .................. 99 A-VII Manning of Transmitters ........................................... 101 A-VIII Meal Periods .............................................................. 103 A-IX Rest Periods .............................................................. 108 A-X Equipment Excessive In Weight ................................ 108 A-XI Use of Employee’s Car .............................................. 108 A-XII Air Credits ................................................................ 109 A-XIII Company-Wide Employment Opportunities ............. 109 A-XIV Daily Employment .................................................... 110 B. Traffic and Communications Agreement ................................................... 120 B-I Scope of Unit .............................................................. 120 B-II Duties ......................................................................... 120 B-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 122 B-IV Transportation for Female Employees ....................... 125 B-V Seniority .................................................................... 126 B-VI Company-Wide Employment Opportunities ............. 126 D. Desk Assistants Agreement ....................................................................... 128 D-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 128 D-II Duties ......................................................................... 128 D-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 129 D-IV Revisions.................................................................... 130 D-V Part-Time Employees ................................................ 131 D-VI Working Conditions ................................................... 131 D-VII Transportation for Employees ................................... 131 D-VIII Provisions of Section 7.7(b) ...................................... 132 iii F. Newswriters-Producers Agreement - San Francisco .................................. 133 F-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 133 F-II Duties ......................................................................... 133 F-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 135 F-IV Air Credits ................................................................. 143 F-V Scripts and Program Ideas ......................................... 143 F-VI [Deleted] .................................................................... 144 F-VII Provisions of Section 8.6(b) ...................................... 144 K. Newswriters Agreement – Chicago .................................................... 145 K-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 145 K-II Duties ......................................................................... 145 K-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 148 K-IV Credits ........................................................................ 157 K-V Use of Materials ......................................................... 157 K-VI Meal Periods .............................................................. 158 O. Newswriters Agreement – Los Angeles ............................................. 159 O-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 159 O-II Duties ......................................................................... 159 O-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 162 O-IV Air Credits ................................................................. 169 O-V Use of Materials ......................................................... 170 P. Plant Maintenance Agreement – Los Angeles .................................... 171 P-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 171 P-II Duties ......................................................................... 171 P-III Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 173 P-IV Lead Persons .............................................................. 177 P-V Seniority ..................................................................... 178 P-VI Vacations ................................................................... 178 R. Publicists Agreement - New York ...................................................... 179 R-I Scope of Unit ............................................................. 179 R-II Classification and Wage Scales ................................. 179 R-III Work Schedule, Overtime and Penalties ................... 183 R-IV Holidays ..................................................................... 184 R-V Provisions of Master Agreement Totally Inapplicable ................................................................ 184 R-VI Seniority ..................................................................... 184 R-VII Vacation Relief Employees ....................................... 185 R-VIII Travel ......................................................................... 186 R-IX Transportation for Female Employees ....................... 186 R-X Vacations ................................................................... 186 R-XI Formal Event ............................................................. 188 iv Signature Page ...................................................................................................... 188 Statement of Interpretation ................................................................................... 189 Stipulation of Agreement ...................................................................................... 190 Sideletters AA Exception to Section 16.2(b) ......................................................................... 198 AB Video Tape Agreement .................................................................................. 198
Load more

Recommended publications
  • When Is a Microprocessor Not a Microprocessor? the Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I
    Ross Bassett When is a Microprocessor not a Microprocessor? The Industrial Construction of Semiconductor Innovation I In the early 1990s an integrated circuit first made in 1969 and thus ante­ dating by two years the chip typically seen as the first microprocessor (Intel's 4004), became a microprocessor for the first time. The stimulus for this piece ofindustrial alchemy was a patent fight. A microprocessor patent had been issued to Texas Instruments, and companies faced with patent infringement lawsuits were looking for prior art with which to challenge it. 2 This old integrated circuit, but new microprocessor, was the ALl, designed by Lee Boysel and used in computers built by his start-up, Four-Phase Systems, established in 1968. In its 1990s reincarnation a demonstration system was built showing that the ALI could have oper­ ated according to the classic microprocessor model, with ROM (Read Only Memory), RAM (Random Access Memory), and I/O (Input/ Output) forming a basic computer. The operative words here are could have, for it was never used in that configuration during its normal life­ time. Instead it was used as one-third of a 24-bit CPU (Central Processing Unit) for a series ofcomputers built by Four-Phase.3 Examining the ALl through the lenses of the history of technology and business history puts Intel's microprocessor work into a different per­ spective. The differences between Four-Phase's and Intel's work were industrially constructed; they owed much to the different industries each saw itselfin.4 While putting a substantial part ofa central processing unit on a chip was not a discrete invention for Four-Phase or the computer industry, it was in the semiconductor industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public
    Loyola University Chicago Loyola eCommons School of Communication: Faculty Publications and Other Works Faculty Publications 9-2013 Taking the ‘Local’ out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public Lee Hood Loyola University Chicago, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.luc.edu/communication_facpubs Part of the Communication Commons Recommended Citation Hood, L. "Taking the ‘Local’ out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public." Journalism and Mass Communication 3(9), 2013. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty Publications at Loyola eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in School of Communication: Faculty Publications and Other Works by an authorized administrator of Loyola eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 License. © David Publishing, 2013. Journalism and Mass Communication, ISSN 2160-6579 September 2013, Vol. 3, No. 9, 549-562 D DAVID PUBLISHING Taking the “Local” out of Local News: Implications for an Informed Public Lee Hood Loyola University Chicago, Chicago, USA The meaning of “local” in TV news is not as straightforward as one might imagine. “Local” newscasts in several U.S. markets are outsourced to an independent company located hundreds of miles from the communities served. What are the implications of such a delivery system for coverage of local issues and the Jeffersonian ideal of an informed citizenry? This study employs a content analysis of outsourced and local newscasts, using a data set of more than 1,000 stories from more than 30 hours of newscasts to determine if differences exist on story topics and source types.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Land of Blood and Honey What’S Fair Or Just in Love and War Crimes? Lessons for Transitional Justice* Carrie Menkel-Meadow
    4 In The Land of Blood and Honey What’s Fair or Just in Love and War Crimes? Lessons for Transitional Justice* Carrie Menkel-Meadow n 1990, the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) held a conference on “Probing the Limits of Representation: Nazism and the IFinal Solution” during which leading international scholars of history, literature, cultural studies, philosophy, critical theory, arts, language, sociology, and psychology explored the question of whether the mass atrocities of Nazism and the Final Solution to exterminate all European Jewry could be represented in anything other than “factual” historical documentation and narrative (Friedlander 1992; White 1992; LaCapra 1996). This was some years after the first documentaries and “fictional- ized” films on the Holocaust had appeared, after Judgment at Nuremberg (Kramer 1961), but before Schindler’s List (Spielberg 1993) and after vari- ous cultural critics had said such things as “there can be no poetry after Auschwitz” (attributed to Theodor Adorno), and no morally acceptable artistic representation could be made of the Shoah (Friedlander 1992). The conference explored what were then called “limits to representation” of certain “truths,” so reprehensible, so mass and, at the same time, so spe- cific or so exceptional (the “German” problem; Maier 1988), that no genre could fully, morally, or “accurately” depict either the systematic evil or the mass pain, death, and injury that is the Holocaust. As the child of Holocaust survivors, I attended that conference as both scholar and one generation removed “victim,” having spent a lifetime listening to my family’s stories and seeing many visual images of both their own stories and the larger international one that was World War II.
    [Show full text]
  • CONTRACT CONFLICT Guy A
    COPYRIGHT © 2017 VIRGINIA LAW REVIEW ASSOCIATION COPYRIGHT SURVIVES: RETHINKING THE COPYRIGHT- CONTRACT CONFLICT Guy A. Rub* Twenty-one years ago, copyright died. More accurately, it was killed. In 1996, in ProCD v. Zeidenberg, Judge Easterbrook, writing for the Seventh Circuit, held that a contract that restricted the use of factual information was not preempted by the Copyright Act and therefore enforceable. The reaction among copyright scholars was swift and passionate. In dozens of articles and books, spreading over two decades, scholars cautioned that if the ProCD approach is broadly adopted, the results would be dire. Through contracts, the rights of copyright owners would run amok, expand, and in doing so they would invade, shrink, and possibly destroy the public domain. Contracts, we were repeatedly warned throughout the years, would kill copyright law. This Article challenges this scholarly consensus by studying the court opinions that have dealt with the copyright-contract conflict over the past four decades. This examination reveals surprising facts: notwithstanding the scholars’ warnings, ProCD’s approach won the day and was embraced by most federal circuit courts. The doomsday scenarios scholars warned against, however, did not materialize. The * Associate Professor, The Ohio State University Michael E. Moritz College of Law. I would like to thank Professors Clark Asay, Ian Ayres, Jonathan Baker, Scott Baker, Omri Ben-Shahar, Robert Brauneis, Wendy Gordon, David Hoffman, Robert Merges, Mark McKenna, Alan Michaels, Michael
    [Show full text]
  • ICN 2020 Virtual Annual Conference Day
    KnowledgeVision | ICN 2020 Day One Sept 14 CYNTHIA: Welcome to ICN 2020. We are delighted that you are joining us this week for the ICN Annual Conference. Today through Wednesday, we'll see two plenary discussions and related working group videos each day. On Thursday, we have special programming on ICN work related to NGAs, younger agencies, and economists. Each day you'll find the link to these session posted on the conference web page, just like you did today. If you have questions, suggestions, or just want to let us know that you're tuning in, you can email us at [email protected] and [email protected]. Follow ICN on Twitter. This week using the special hashtag ICN2020. And now it is my great pleasure to turn it over to [INAUDIBLE] president and ICN chair Andreas Mundt. ANDREAS Thanks a lot, Cynthia. Well, welcome to the 2020 ICN Annual Conference, a MUNDT: meeting of members of the ICN of our non-governmental advisors and many other people this time, because we take a chance and have more attendees than ever probably. We have four conference days ahead of us. We're going to have a host showcase. There will be working group plenaries. There will be special sessions for younger agencies for our non-governmental advisors for economists, and there will be a follow up program after the conference that will be organized by the working groups. There will be weekly events. Well, this is our first virtual conference. A virtual organization like the ICN and a virtual conference sounds easy, but in fact, it was hard to do that, to set up the program adjusted to the virtual world.
    [Show full text]
  • Cashier Du Cinema
    PROFILES CASHIER DU CINEMA After supermarkets, private equity, and politics, Ron Burkle makes a move on Hollywood. BY CONNIE BRUCK nside the towering iron gates of Green don’t want to think you’re in L.A., you’re Around that time, Burkle was seen at an Acres, a Beverly Hills estate built in not really in L.A.” L.A. night club, with “two drop-dead- theI nineteen-twenties by the silent-film Burkle turned Green Acres into the gorgeous girls, maybe twenty years old, actor Harold Lloyd, a narrow road climbs city’s premier political showcase. Shortly one on either arm,” a person who was at through eight acres of lawns and gardens after buying the estate, he hosted a fund- the club said. “It was such a statement: to a mansion modelled on the Villa Pal- raiser for Senator Dianne Feinstein, I can do whatever I want.” The New mieri, the Florentine palazzo where Boc- whose campaign he served as a finance York Post ran items about Burkle carous- caccio set the “Decameron.” One after- chair. The next year, he met Bill Clinton, ing with young models on his plane, noon in mid-June, the courtyard held a who was running for President, and the which had customized sleeping quarters. dozen gleaming sports cars—Lambor- two found a ready kinship. Although (Burkle, working with an F.B.I. sting, se- ghinis, Teslas, Ferraris, McLarens—ar- Burkle was a registered Republican until cretly videotaped the Post columnist ranged in a circular design, like giant steel 2004, by the mid-nineties he had be- Jared Paul Stern asking him for money petals.
    [Show full text]
  • DOC-372961A1.Pdf
    REPORT NO. PN-2-210603-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 06/03/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 ACTIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000146571 Transfer of DTV KTRK-TV 35675 Main 210.0 HOUSTON, TX KTRK TELEVISION, 06/01/2021 Granted Control INC. From: ABC, Inc. To: ABC TV Holding, LLC 0000146382 License To FM KOFG 121854 91.1 CODY, WY GOSPEL 06/01/2021 Granted Cover MESSENGERS From: To: 0000148312 Minor DCA W27EB- 71111 Main 710.0 SUGAR GROVE, LOCAL MEDIA TV 06/01/2021 Granted Modification D IL CHICAGO, LLC From: To: 0000146568 Transfer of DTV KGO-TV 34470 Main 204.0 SAN FRANCISCO KGO TELEVISION, 06/01/2021 Granted Control , CA INC. From: ABC Holding Company, Inc. To: ABC TV Holding, LLC 0000146557 Assignment DTV WPVI-TV 8616 Main 82.0 PHILADELPHIA, ABC, INC. 06/01/2021 Granted of PA Authorization From: ABC, INC. To: WPVI Television (Philadelphia), LLC 0000146569 Transfer of DTV KFSN-TV 8620 Main 566.0 FRESNO, CA KFSN TELEVISION, 06/01/2021 Granted Control LLC From: ABC, Inc. To: ABC TV Holding, LLC Page 1 of 10 REPORT NO. PN-2-210603-01 | PUBLISH DATE: 06/03/2021 Federal Communications Commission 45 L Street NE PUBLIC NOTICE Washington, D.C. 20554 News media info. (202) 418-0500 ACTIONS File Number Purpose Service Call Sign Facility ID Station Type Channel/Freq. City, State Applicant or Licensee Status Date Status 0000145573 License To FL WQSW- 124483 100.5 FORT WAYNE, IN QUASI, INC.
    [Show full text]
  • HOW DID SILICON VALLEY BECOME SILICON VALLEY? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions
    HOW DID SILICON VALLEY BECOME SILICON VALLEY? Three Surprising Lessons for Other Cities and Regions a report from: supported by: 2 / How Silicon Valley Became "Silicon Valley" This report was created by Rhett Morris and Mariana Penido. They wish to thank Jona Afezolli, Fernando Fabre, Mike Goodwin, Matt Lerner, and Han Sun who provided critical assistance and input. For additional information on this research, please contact Rhett Morris at [email protected]. How Silicon Valley Became "Silicon Valley" / 3 INTRODUCTION THE JOURNALIST Don Hoefler coined the York in the chip industry.4 No one expected the term “Silicon Valley” in a 1971 article about region to become a hub for these technology computer chip companies in the San Francisco companies. Bay Area.1 At that time, the region was home to Silicon Valley’s rapid development offers many prominent chip businesses, such as Intel good news to other cities and regions. This and AMD. All of these companies used silicon report will share the story of its creation and to manufacture their chips and were located in analyze the steps that enabled it to grow. While a farming valley south of the city. Hoefler com- it is impossible to replicate the exact events that bined these two facts to create a new name for established this region 50 years ago, the devel- the area that highlighted the success of these opment of Silicon Valley can provide insights chip businesses. to leaders in communities across the world. Its Silicon Valley is now the most famous story illustrates three important lessons for cul- technology hub in the world, but it was a very tivating high-growth companies and industries: different place before these businesses devel- oped.
    [Show full text]
  • Dena Slothower
    Sketches & Applications 158 ComicDiary: Representing 176 Elastic Object Manipulation Using Chair Individual Experiences in Comics Coarse-to-fine Representation of Dena Slothower Style Mass-Spring Models 159 Compressing Large Polygonal 177 ELMO: A Head-Mounted Display Stanford University Models for Real-Time Image Synthesis 160 A Computationally Efficient 178 Elmo’s World: Digital Puppetry on Framework for Modeling Soft Body “Sesame Street” 140 Committee & Jury Impact 179 The Empathic Visualisation 141 Introduction 161 Computing 3D Geometry Directly Algorithm: Chernoff Faces from Range Images Revisited 142 “2001: An MR-Space Odyssey” 162 Computing Nearly Exact Visible 180 Enhanced Reality: A New Frontier Applying Mixed Reality Technology Sets within a Shaft with 4D for Computer Entertainment to VFX in Filmmaking Hierarchical Z-Buffering 181 Explicit Control of Topological 138 143 2D Shape Interpolation Using a 163 CONTIGRA: A High-Level XML- Evolution in 3D Mesh Morphing Hierarchical Approach Based Aprroach to Interactive 3D 182 Fair and Robust Curve Interpolation 144 3D Traffic Visualization in Real Components on the Sphere Time 164 Crashing Planes the Easy Way: 183 A Fast Simulating System for 145 ALVIN on the Web: Distributive Pearl Harbor Realistic Motion and Realistic Mission Rehearsal for a Deep 165 Creating Tools for PLAYSTA- Appearance of Fluids Submersible Vehicle TION2 Game Development 184 Fast-moving Water in DreamWorks’ 146 Analysis and Simulation of Facial 166 Creative Approaches to the “Spirit” Movements in Elicited and Posed
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of Changes in Basic Cable TV Programming Costs
    Analysis of Changes in Basic Cable TV Programming Costs Prepared by: Robert Gessner President Massillon Cable TV, Inc. Massillon, OH Phone: 330-833-5509 Email: [email protected] November 5, 2013 1 Analysis of Changes in Basic Cable TV Programming Costs It is important to note that all of this information is specific to MCTV. Our costs are unique to the extent that we offer our customers a set of networks and channels that differs from others. We also may have different costs for program content due to different outcomes of negotiations. However, I am confident you will find that the facts presented are an accurate representation of the current costs of Basic Cable TV programming, the increase in costs expected in 2014 and the rest of this decade for any independent cable TV company in the US. I believe any other cable TV company will report similar increases in cost, contract terms and conditions, and expectations for the future. 2 Analysis of Changes in Basic Cable TV Programming Costs Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................................ 4 Expect Large Increases ............................................................................................... 4 There Are No “Local” TV Stations in NE Ohio ............................................................. 4 Seven Major Media Companies Control US TV ........................................................... 4 Contracts Are Becoming More Restrictive ..................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 in the Matter of Broadcast Localism MB Docket No. 04-233 DA
    Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 ) In the Matter of ) ) Broadcast Localism ) MB Docket No. 04-233 ) DA 01-1264 ) ) ) COMMENTS OF THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY The Walt Disney Company files these comments on behalfofthe ABC Owned Television Station Group, ABC Radio, and the ABC Television Network in response to the FCC's Notice ofInquiry regarding Broadcast Localism. I. Introduction The Notice ofInquiry was issued to receive direct input on "how broadcasters are serving the interests and needs oftheir communities" and, in particular, whether the FCC should "adopt new policies, practices, or rules designed directly to promote localism in broadcast television and radio; and what those policies, practices, or rules should be."} The NOI specifically seeks comments on several discrete policy goals and asks whether market forces are sufficient to meet these goals or whether regulation is needed to ensure that these goals are met. While Disney is the ultimate corporate parent ofthe ABC Owned Television and Radio stations, the stations themselves are operated locally. The ABC Owned Television I Localism NOI, at para. 7. Station Group consists often television stations in the following markets: New York, Los Angeles, Chicago, Philadelphia, San Francisco, Houston, Fresno, Raleigh-Durham, Flint, and Toledo. ABC, Inc. is an indirect subsidiary ofThe Walt Disney Company and owns, directly or through subsidiaries, over seventy commercial radio broadcast stations in the United States ("ABC Radio"). The ABC Television and Radio stations are committed to localism, separate and apart from any FCC regulation. These comments highlight only a few ofthe ways in which the ABC stations operate in the local interest, and even the extensive attachments to these comments represent only a sampling ofthe stations' localism efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • Local TV Coverage of the 2000 General Election
    Local TV Coverage of the 2000 General Election Martin Kaplan, Principal Investigator Matthew Hale, Research Director Most Americans say they get most of their news from local television. We analyzed the local news programs watched by most Americans to find out what news they received on the 2000 general election. We analyzed local broadcast television coverage on 74 stations in 58 markets in the last 30 days before the election to see whether a White House panel’s recommendation of airing five minutes of candidate centered discourse (CCD) a night had an impact. We found that the 74 stations ran an average of 74 seconds of CCD per night. The average sound bite was 14 seconds; 55 percent of the stories focused on strategy; 24 percent focused on issues; and less than 1 percent were adwatch stories. Local TV News Coverage of the 2000 General Election The Norman Lear Center The Ford Foundation The Alliance for Better Campaigns The Norman Lear Center is a The Alliance for Better Campaigns is a The Ford Foundation is a resource for multidisciplinary research and public policy public interest group that seeks to innovative people and institutions center exploring implications of the improve elections by promoting worldwide. For more than a century, its convergence of entertainment, commerce campaigns in which the most useful goals have been to strengthen democratic and society. On campus, from its base in information reaches the greatest values; reduce poverty and injustice; the USC Annenberg School for number of citizens in the most engaging promote international cooperation; and Communication, the Lear Center builds ways.
    [Show full text]