DOCSLIB.ORG

Official Application Dossier for the Accession to the Global Geoparks Network

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Official Application Dossier for the Accession to the Global Geoparks Network OFFICIAL APPLICATION DOSSIER FOR THE ACCESSION TO THE GLOBAL GEOPARKS NETWORK YANGAN-TAU GEOPARK (Yangantau, Republic of Bashkortostan, Russian Federation) November 2017 CONTENTS CONTENTS .................................................................................................................................... 2 А. IDENTIFICATION OF THE AREA ........................................................................................ 4 А.1. NAME OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK .......................................................................... 4 А.2. LOCATION OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ................................................................. 4 A.3. SURFACE AREA, PHYSICAL AND HUMAN GEOGRAPHY CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK .............................................................................................. 5 А.3.1. Geopark square area ...................................................................................................... 5 А.3.2. Physical geography ....................................................................................................... 5 А.3.3. Social-economic geography .......................................................................................... 6 А.4. ORGANIZATION IN CHARGE AND MANAGEMENT STRUCTURE OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ............................................................................................................. 7 А.4.1. Governing board ............................................................................................................ 7 A. 4.2. Main goals of the Center of Novel Educational Technologies “Yangan-Tau Geopark” .................................................................................................................................. 8 А.5. APPLICATION CONTACT PERSON ............................................................................. 11 B. GEOLOGICAL HERITAGE ................................................................................................... 12 В.1. GENERAL GEOLOGICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ........... 12 B.1.1. Geodiversity and geoheritage ...................................................................................... 13 Paleontology and stratigraphy ........................................................................................... 13 Hydrogeology ..................................................................................................................... 14 Mineral resources ............................................................................................................... 14 Geomorphology .................................................................................................................. 14 B.1.2. Differences and mutually complementary aspects compared to neighboring geoparks ................................................................................................................................................ 14 В.2. LISTING AND DESCRIPTION OF GEOLOGICAL SITES WITHIN THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ................................................................................................................................. 16 В.2.1. Geological sites ........................................................................................................... 16 В.2.2. Mineral deposits .......................................................................................................... 18 В.3. DETAILS ON THE INTEREST OF THESE SITES IN TERMS OF THEIR INTERNATIONAL, NATIONAL, REGIONAL OR LOCAL VALUE .................................. 18 В.4.1.Geological sites ............................................................................................................ 18 В.4.2. Mineral deposits .......................................................................................................... 20 В.4. LISTING AND DESCRIPTION OF OTHER SITES OF NATURAL, CULTURAL AND INTANGIBLE HERITAGE INTEREST AND HOW THEY ARE RELATED TO THE GEOLOGICAL SITES AND HOW THEY ARE INTEGRATED INTO THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ................................................................................................................................. 20 B.4.1. Natural Heritage Area .................................................................................................. 20 B.4.1.1. International significance ...................................................................................... 20 B.4.1.2. National significance ............................................................................................ 20 B.4.1.3. Regional significance ............................................................................................ 20 B.4.1.4. Local significance ................................................................................................. 23 B.4.2. Cultural heritage rank .................................................................................................. 23 B.4.2.1. International significance ...................................................................................... 23 B.4.2.2. National significance ............................................................................................ 24 B.4.2.3. Regional significance ............................................................................................ 25 B.4.2.4. Local significance ................................................................................................. 26 B.4.3. Sites of cultural intangible heritage ............................................................................. 27 С. GEOCONSERVATION ........................................................................................................... 29 С.1. CURRENT AND POTENTIAL PRESSURE ON THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ........... 29 2 С.2. CURRENT STATUS IN TERMS OF PROTECTION OF GEOLOGICAL SITES WITHIN THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ................................................................................... 29 C.3. DATA ON THE MANAGEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL HERITAGE SITES (GEOLOGICAL AND NON-GEOLOGICAL) ......................................................................... 31 C3.1. Management of geological sites ................................................................................... 31 C3.2. Maintenance of geological sites ................................................................................... 32 C.3.3. Management and maintenance of non-geological sites ............................................... 32 D. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY & BUSINESS PLAN (INCLUDING DETAILED FINANCIAL INFORMATION) .......................................................................................................................... 33 D.1. ECONOMIC ACTIVITY IN THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ........................................... 33 D. 1.2. Results of economic activity ...................................................................................... 33 D.2. EXISTING AND PLANNED FACILITIES FOR THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ........... 35 D.2.1. Existing geoeducational sites ...................................................................................... 35 D.2.2. Projected geoeducational sites .................................................................................... 36 D.2.3. Existing geotourist sites .............................................................................................. 37 D.2.4. Existing tourist sites .................................................................................................... 38 D.2.5. Projected geotourist sites ............................................................................................. 38 D.3. ANALYSIS OF GEOTOURISM POTENTIAL OF THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ....... 41 D.3.1. Description of the current level of tourism ................................................................. 41 D.3.2. Geotourism research and strategy ............................................................................... 41 D. 3.3. Conclusions ................................................................................................................ 42 D.4. OVERVIEW AND POLICIES FOR THE SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT OF: ...... 42 D.4.1. Geo-tourism and economics ........................................................................................ 42 D. 4.2. Geo-education ............................................................................................................ 45 D. 4.3. Geo-heritage ............................................................................................................... 46 D.5. POLICIES FOR, AND EXAMPLES OF, COMMUNITY EMPOWERMENT (INVOLVEMENT AND CONSULTATION) IN THE PROPOSED GEOPARK ................... 47 D.5.1. Local community participation and consultation policy ............................................. 47 D.5.2. Examples of policies for community participation and consultation .......................... 48 D.6. POLICIES FOR, AND EXAMPLES OF, PUBLIC AND STAKEHOLDER AWARENESS IN THE PROPOSED GEOPARK .................................................................... 48 D.6.1. The policy of informing the public and interested parties in the proposed geoparks . 48 D.6.2. Raising awareness of the proposed geopark ............................................................... 48 D.6.3. Examples of stakeholder awareness in the proposed geopark .................................... 49 E. INTEREST AND ARGUMENTS FOR BECOMING A UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK ... 51 E.1. INTEREST IN BECOMING A UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK .................................... 51 E.2.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Euselachian Shark from the Early Permian of the Middle Urals, Russia
    A new euselachian shark from the early Permian of the Middle Urals, Russia ALEXANDER O. IVANOV, CHRISTOPHER J. DUFFIN, and SERGE V. NAUGOLNYKH Ivanov , A.O., Duffin, C.J., and Naugolnykh, S.V. 2017. A new euselachian shark from the early Permian of the Middle Urals, Russia. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 62 (2): 289–298. The isolated teeth of a new euselachian shark Artiodus prominens Ivanov and Duffin gen. et sp. nov. have been found in the Artinskian Stage (Early Permian) of Krasnoufimskie Klyuchiki quarry (Sverdlovsk Region, Middle Urals, Russia). The teeth of Artiodus possess a multicuspid orthodont crown with from four to nine triangular cusps; prominent labial projection terminating in a large round tubercle; distinct ornamentation from straight or recurved cristae; oval or semilu- nar, elongate, considerably vascularized base; dense vascular network formed of transverse horizontal, ascending, short secondary and semicircular canals. The teeth of the new taxon otherwise most closely resemble the teeth of some prot- acrodontid and sphenacanthid euselachians possessing a protacrodont-type crown, but differ from the teeth of all other known euselachians in the unique structure of the labial projection. The studied teeth vary in crown and base morphol- ogy, and three tooth morphotypes can be distinguished in the collection reflecting a moderate degree of linear gradient monognathic heterodonty. The range of morphologies otherwise displayed by the collection of teeth shows the greatest similarity to that described for the dentitions of relatively high-crowned hybodontids from the Mesozoic. The internal structure of the teeth, including their vascularization system is reconstructed using microtomography. The highest chon- drichthyan taxonomic diversity is found in the Artinskian, especially from the localities of the Middle and South Urals.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA'n' WATERWAYS
    - The 2018 FIFA World Cup will be the 21st FIFA World Cup, a quadrennial international football tournament contested by the men's national teams of the member associations of FIFA. It is scheduled to take place in Russia from 14 June to 15 July 2018,[2] 2018 FIFA WORLD CUP RUSSIA’n’WATERWAYS after the country was awarded the hosting rights on 2 December 2010. This will be the rst World Cup held in Europe since 2006; all but one of the stadium venues are in European Russia, west of the Ural Mountains to keep travel time manageable. - The nal tournament will involve 32 national teams, which include 31 teams determined through qualifying competitions and Routes from the Five Seas 14 June - 15 July 2018 the automatically quali ed host team. A total of 64 matches will be played in 12 venues located in 11 cities. The nal will take place on 15 July in Moscow at the Luzhniki Stadium. - The general visa policy of Russia will not apply to the World Cup participants and fans, who will be able to visit Russia without a visa right before and during the competition regardless of their citizenship [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_FIFA_World_Cup]. IDWWS SECTION: Rybinsk – Moscow (433 km) Barents Sea WATERWAYS: Volga River, Rybinskoye, Ughlichskoye, Ivan’kovskoye Reservoirs, Moscow Electronic Navigation Charts for Russian Inland Waterways (RIWW) Canal, Ikshinskoye, Pestovskoye, Klyaz’minskoye Reservoirs, Moskva River 600 MOSCOW Luzhniki Arena Stadium (81.000), Spartak Arena Stadium (45.000) White Sea Finland Belomorsk [White Sea] Belomorsk – Petrozavodsk (402 km) Historic towns: Rybinsk, Ughlich, Kimry, Dubna, Dmitrov Baltic Sea Lock 13,2 White Sea – Baltic Canal, Onega Lake Small rivers: Medveditsa, Dubna, Yukhot’, Nerl’, Kimrka, 3 Helsinki 8 4,0 Shosha, Mologa, Sutka 400 402 Arkhangel’sk Towns: Seghezha, Medvezh’yegorsk, Povenets Lock 12,2 Vyborg Lakes: Vygozero, Segozero, Volozero (>60.000 lakes) 4 19 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 30 1 2 3 6 7 10 14 15 4,0 MOSCOW, Group stage 1/8 1/4 1/2 3 1 Estonia Petrozavodsk IDWWS SECTION: [Baltic Sea] St.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region Pwc Russia ( Provides Industry-Focused Assurance, Advisory, Tax and Legal Services
    Guide to Investment Chelyabinsk Region PwC Russia (www.pwc.ru) provides industry-focused assurance, advisory, tax and legal services. Over 2,500 professionals working in PwC offices in Moscow, St Petersburg, Ekaterinburg, Kazan, Novosibirsk, Krasnodar, Yuzhno-Sakhalinsk and Vladikavkaz share their thinking, experience and solutions to develop fresh perspectives and practical advice for our clients. Global PwC network includes over 169,000 employees in 158 countries. PwC first appeared in Russia in 1913 and re-established its presence here in 1989. Since then, PwC has been a leader in providing professional services in Russia. According to the annual rating published in Expert magazine, PwC is the largest audit and consulting firm in Russia (see Expert, 2000-2011). This overview has been prepared in conjunction with and based on the materials provided by the Ministry of Economic Development of Chelyabinsk Region. This publication has been prepared for general guidance on matters of interest only, and does not constitute professional advice. You should not act upon the information contained in this publication without obtaining specific professional advice. No representation or warranty (express or implied) is given as to the accuracy or completeness of the information contained in this publication, and, to the extent permitted by law, PwC network, its members, employees and agents accept no liability, and disclaim all responsibility, for the consequences of you or anyone else acting, or refraining to act, in reliance on the information
    [Show full text]
  • Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998
    Taking Stock WORLDWIDE NUCLEAR DEPLOYMENTS 1998 BY William M. Arkin Robert S. Norris Joshua Handler NRDC Nuclear Program MARCH 1998 NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, INC. 1200 New York Ave., NW, Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20005 202/289-6868 VOICE 802-457-3426 (Arkin) 202-289-2369 (Norris) FAX 202-289-1060 INTERNET [email protected] [email protected] Worldwide Nuclear Deployments 1998 i © Copyright, Natural Resources Defense Council, 1998 ii TAKING STOCK Table of Contents Introduction . 1 Methodology . 4 Arms Control and Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I) . 6 Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START II) . 7 The Intermediate Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty . 8 Unilateral Initiatives . 8 Future Nuclear Deployments . 11 The United States . 14 Nuclear History . 16 Nuclear Organization . 19 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 24 Russia . 26 Nuclear Organization . 29 Nuclear Weapons Deployments . 33 Britain . 39 France . 42 China . 45 Appendix A: Locations of U.S. Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 53 Appendix B: U.S. Nuclear Weapons by Location . 55 Appendix C: U.S. Nuclear Weapons, Location Profiles . 56 By State California . 56 Colorado . 57 Georgia. 58 Louisiana . 59 Missouri . 60 Montana . 61 Nebraska . 61 Nevada . 62 New Mexico. 63 North Dakota . 65 Texas . 68 Virginia . 70 Washington . 70 Wyoming . 72 Overseas by Country Belgium . 72 Germany . 73 Greece . 76 Italy . 77 The Netherlands . 78 Turkey . 78 United Kingdom . 79 Appendix D: Location of Russian Nuclear Weapons, by Type . 81 Appendix E: Russian Nuclear Weapons by Location . 84 Appendix F: British Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location . 88 Appendix G: French Nuclear Weapons by Type and Location .
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Diversity and Spatial Vegetation Structure of the Calcareous Spring Fen in the "Arkaulovskoye Mire" Protected Area (Southern Urals, Russia)
    Plant diversity and spatial vegetation structure of the calcareous spring fen in the "Arkaulovskoye Mire" Protected Area (Southern Urals, Russia) E.Z. Baisheva1, A.A. Muldashev1, V.B. Martynenko1, N.I. Fedorov1, I.G. Bikbaev1, T.Yu., Minayeva2, A.A. Sirin2 1Ufa Institute of Biology, Russian Academy of Sciences Ufa Federal Research Centre, Ufa, Russian Federation 2Institute of Forest Science, Russian Academy of Sciences, Uspenskoe, Russian Federation _______________________________________________________________________________________ SUMMARY The plant communities of base-rich fens are locally rare and have high conservation value in the Republic of Bashkortostan (Russian Federation), and indeed across the whole of Russia. The flora and vegetation of the calcareous spring fen in the protected area (natural monument) “Arkaulovskoye Mire” (Republic of Bashkortostan, Southern Urals Region) was investigated. The species recorded comprised 182 vascular plants and 87 bryophytes (67 mosses and 20 liverworts), including 26 rare species listed in the Red Data Book of the Republic of Bashkortostan and seven species listed in the Red Data Book of the Russian Federation. The study area is notable for the presence of isolated populations of relict species whose main ranges are associated with humid coastal and mountainous regions in Central Europe. The vegetation cover of the protected area consists of periodically flooded grey alder - bird cherry forests, sedge - reed birch and birch - alder forested mire, sparse pine and birch forested mire with dominance of Molinia caerulea, base-rich fens with Schoenus ferrugineus, islets of meso-oligotrophic moss - shrub - dwarf pine mire communities, aquatic communities of small pools and streams, etc. Examination of the peat deposit indicates the occurrence of both historical and present-day travertine deposition.
    [Show full text]
  • Meeting Theme: Learn and Explore the Unique Local Spirit and Rich Culture of Ural
    Meeting theme: Learn and explore the unique local spirit and rich culture of Ural Invitation to the 2nd Servas Russia International Meeting 19- 24 June 2019 Sverdlovsk region, Krasnoufimsk district, Ural, Russia [email protected] www.facebook.com/ServasRussia ______________________________________________________________________________________________ 04.Jan. 2019 Dear Servas members worldwide, Servas Russia, with the support of the Krasnoufimsk District Authority, is honored and happy to invite you to our Servas Meeting (RSM). The meeting will be held from 19th to 24th June 2019. We shall be very happy to have you with us, sharing an enjoyable and educational week of social activities, getting to know the real Russian culture and daily life together with beautiful cities and nature areas of the Ural hills, having also the chance to meet old and new friends from around the world. Our theme for the meeting will be "Exploring the unique spirit and rich culture of Ural." Those who have been part of previous meeting will know what a wonderful experience it is, to be part of such an international event where people from many nationalities, languages and cultures come together from across the world. In addition, the participants will enjoy the known Ural Russian generous soul, food, drinks, culture, churches, nature, banya (like sauna) and more. The meeting will take place in Sverdlovsk region, Krasnoufimsk district, which is the recreation center “Express” (10 km from Krasnoufimsk town, 215 km from Yekaterinburg – the capital of the Ural
    [Show full text]
  • Number and Distribution of Gyrfalcons on the West Siberian Plain. Pages 267–272 in R
    NUMBER AND DISTRIBUTION OF GYRFALCONS ON THE WEST SIBERIAN PLAIN IRINA POKROVSKAYA AND GRIGORY TERTITSKI Institute of Geography, Russian Academy of Sciences, 29 Staromonetny per., Moscow, 119017, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT.—Using our own observations and published records, we discuss the breeding range, number, and distribution of Gyrfalcons (Falco rusticolus) on the West Siberian plain. We show that the currently accepted assessment of Gyrfalcon numbers appears to be underestimated. The southern limit of the species’ breeding range should be defined south of forest-tundra. With the predicted northward expansion of forest due to climate change, West Siberian and neighboring Gyrfalcons of subspecies F. r. intermedius appear preadapted to such habitat and may be favored by its expansion. These considerations call for increased efforts to survey the region for the pres- ence of nesting Gyrfalcons. Received 22 March 2011, accepted 23 May 2011. POKROVSKAYA, I., AND G. TERTITSKI. 2011. Number and distribution of Gyrfalcons on the West Siberian Plain. Pages 267–272 in R. T. Watson, T. J. Cade, M. Fuller, G. Hunt, and E. Potapov (Eds.). Gyrfalcons and Ptarmigan in a Changing World, Volume II. The Peregrine Fund, Boise, Idaho, USA. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.4080/gpcw.2011.0305 Key words: Gyrfalcon, West Siberian Plain, breeding range, forest-tundra, taiga. FOR EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT Plain. Approximately 25–50 breeding pairs OF GYRFALCONS (FALCO RUSTICOLUS), an accu- nest there in forest-tundra habitat in a study rate estimate of the abundance and distribution area of 28,000 km2 (Figure 1, site 1). This is of the species in Russia is important because the highest reported density of Gyrfalcons in Russia contains the largest part of the species’ the world at about 12.2 pairs per 1,000 km2 world range.
    [Show full text]
  • Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the Former Soviet Union [FSU]
    Annotations for Monthly Discharges for 2400 Rivers and Streams of the former Soviet Union [FSU] v1.1, September, 2001 Byron A. Bodo [email protected] Toronto, Canada Disclaimer Users assume responsibility for errors in the river and stream discharge data, associated metadata [river names, gauge names, drainage areas, & geographic coordinates], and the annotations contained herein. No doubt errors and discrepancies remain in the metadata and discharge records. Anyone data set users who uncover further errors and other discrepancies are invited to report them to NCAR. Acknowledgement Most discharge records in this compilation originated from the State Hydrological Institute [SHI] in St. Petersburg, Russia. Problems with some discharge records and metadata notwithstanding; this compilation could not have been created were it not for the efforts of SHI. The University of New Hampshire’s Global Hydrology Group is credited for making the SHI Arctic Basin data available. Foreword This document was prepared for on-screen viewing, not printing !!! Printed output can be very messy. To ensure wide accessibility, this document was prepared as an MS Word 6 doc file. The www addresses are not active hyperlinks. They have to be copied and pasted into www browsers. Clicking on a page number in the Table of Contents will jump the cursor to the beginning of that section of text [in the MS Word version, not the pdf file]. Distribution Files Files in the distribution package are listed below: Contents File name short abstract abstract.txt ascii description of
    [Show full text]
  • Excursion Guide
    INQUA–SEQS 2002 Conference INQUA–SEQS ‘02 UPPER PLIOCENE AND PLEISTOCENE OF THE SOUTHERN URALS REGION AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR CORRELATION OF THE EASTERN AND WESTERN PARTS OF EUROPE Excursion Guide Ufa – 2002 INTERNATIONAL UNION FOR QUATERNARY RESEARCH INQUA COMMISSION ON STRATIGRAPHY INQUA SUBCOMISSION ON EUROPEAN QUATERNARY STRATIGRAPHY RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES UFIMIAN SCIENTIFIC CENTRE INSTITUTE OF GEOLOGY STATE GEOLOGICAL DEPARTMENT OF THE BASHKORTOSTAN REPUBLIC RUSSIAN SCIENCE FOUNDATION FOR BASIC RESEARCH ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE BASHKORTOSTAN REPUBLIC OIL COMPANY “BASHNEFT” BASHKIR STATE UNIVERSITY INQUA–SEQS 2002 Conference 30 June – 7 July, 2002, Ufa (Russia) UPPER PLIOCENE AND PLEISTOCENE OF THE SOUTHERN URALS REGION AND ITS SIGNIFICANCE FOR CORRELATION OF THE EASTERN AND WESTERN PARTS OF EUROPE Excursion Guide Ufa–2002 ББК УДК 551/782/.79+[550.384+561+562](282.247.415.5) EXCURSION GUIDE of the INQUA SEQS – 2002 conference, 30 June – 7 July, 2002, Ufa (Russia) / G. A. Danukalova, A. G. Yakovlev, V. N. Puchkov, K. N. Danukalov, A. K. Agadjanian, Th. van Kolfschoten, A. A. Eremeev and E. M. Morozova. Ufa: Dauria, 2002. 139 pp., Tabl. 22, Fig. 48, Plates 7. ISBN Summarised information on the Upper Pliocene – Pleistocene deposits of the Southern Urals with descriptions of the key sections and with the distribution of significant ostracode species, molluscs, large and small mammals and plant remains. The Late Cenozoic history of the Southern Urals region is characterised by the transgression of the Aktschagylian Sea, which flooded all river valleys of the Southern Fore-Urals during the Pliocene. The Pleistocene deposits in the area are of continental origin.
    [Show full text]
  • INQUA SEQS 2020 Conference Proceedings
    INQUA SEQS 2020 Conference Proceedings P oland, 2020 Quaternary Stratigraphy – palaeoenvironment, sediments, palaeofauna and human migrations across Central Europe Edited by Artur Sobczyk Urszula Ratajczak-Skrzatek Marek Kasprzak Adam Kotowski Adrian Marciszak Krzysztof Stefaniak INQUA SEQS 2020 Conference Proceedings Wrocław, Poland, 28th September 2020 Quaternary Stratigraphy – palaeoenvironment, sediments, palaeofauna and human migrations across Central Europe International conference dedicated to the 70th Birthday Anniversary of prof. Adam Nadachowski Editorial Board: Artur Sobczyk, Urszula Ratajczak-Skrzatek, Marek Kasprzak, Adam Kotowski, Adrian Marciszak & Krzysztof Stefaniak Cover design & DTP: Artur Sobczyk Cover image: Male skull of the Barbary lion Panthera leo leo (Linnaeus, 1758) from the collection of Department of Paleozoology, University of Wrocław, Poland. Photo by Małgorzata Marcula ISBN: 978-83-942304-8-7 (Polish Geological Society) © 2020 | This work is published under the terms of the CC-BY license. Supporting Organizations INQUA – SEQS Section on European Quaternary Stratigraphy INQUA – SACCOM Commission on Stratigraphy and Chronology INQUA – International Union for Quaternary Research Polish Academy of Sciences (PAS) Committee for Quaternary Research, PAS Polish Geological Society University of Wrocław Please cite this book as: Sobczyk A., Ratajczak-Skrzatek U., Kasprzak M., Kotowski A., Marciszak A., Stefaniak K. (eds.), 2020. Proceedings of INQUA SEQS 2020 Conference, Wrocław, Poland. University of Wrocław & Polish Geological Society, 124 p. Preface In the year 2019, we decided to organize the 2020 SEQS-INQUA conference “Quaternary Stratigraphy – palaeoenvironment, sediments, fauna and human migrations across Central Europe”. The original idea was to offer a conference program with a plenary oral presentation at a venue located in the Śnieżnik Mountains (in the Sudetes) combined with field sessions in the Sudeten caves, the Giant Mountains (Karkonosze) and the Kraków-Częstochowa Upland.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of Reference Stream Gauges at the River Ufa Catchment
    International Journal of Environmental Science Elena Belozerova et al. http://iaras.org/iaras/journals/ijes Selection of reference stream gauges at the river Ufa catchment ELENA BELOZEROVA1,2, NATALIYA KRASNOGORSKAYA1, ANTONIA LONGOBARDI2, ELVIRA NAFIKOVA1, 1 Department of Production Safety and Industrial Ecology, Ufa State Aviation Technical University, Karl-Marx-Str. 12, 450000, Ufa, RUSSIAN FEDERATION 2Department of Civil Engineering University of Salerno University Via Giovanni Paolo II, 132, Fisciano (SA) ITALY [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: - The paper is devoted to the problem of selection of reference stream gauges to estimate the average daily streamflow for ungauged catchments. Daily streamflow data are crucial for several fields such as water management, rational resource utilization, hydropower energy production, but the number of ungauged watersheds is still big and it is needed a large scale of regional approaches as a practical response to this problem. In the following, results of an application to the catchments of the rivers: Ufa, Ai, Bolshoj Ik, Tjuj, Sars and Jurjuzan are presented. The map correlation method has been performed [1], where differences is made between the “closest” stream gauge and the “best correlated” stream gauge criterion for reference station selection. It was found that selection of the nearest stream gauges do not usually provide high correlation between their daily streamflow values. Whereas choosing most correlated stream gauge as a reference perform better results in case of goodness of fit parameters (lower errors and higher NSE), compared to the nearest stream gauge. Key - Words: - Daily streamflow, ungauged catchment prediction, reference stream gauge, Russian Federation.
    [Show full text]
  • Making the Russian Bomb from Stalin to Yeltsin
    MAKING THE RUSSIAN BOMB FROM STALIN TO YELTSIN by Thomas B. Cochran Robert S. Norris and Oleg A. Bukharin A book by the Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. Westview Press Boulder, San Francisco, Oxford Copyright Natural Resources Defense Council © 1995 Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................. List of Tables ................................................... Preface and Acknowledgements ..................................... CHAPTER ONE A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE SOVIET BOMB Russian and Soviet Nuclear Physics ............................... Towards the Atomic Bomb .......................................... Diverted by War ............................................. Full Speed Ahead ............................................ Establishment of the Test Site and the First Test ................ The Role of Espionage ............................................ Thermonuclear Weapons Developments ............................... Was Joe-4 a Hydrogen Bomb? .................................. Testing the Third Idea ...................................... Stalin's Death and the Reorganization of the Bomb Program ........ CHAPTER TWO AN OVERVIEW OF THE STOCKPILE AND COMPLEX The Nuclear Weapons Stockpile .................................... Ministry of Atomic Energy ........................................ The Nuclear Weapons Complex ...................................... Nuclear Weapon Design Laboratories ............................... Arzamas-16 .................................................. Chelyabinsk-70
    [Show full text]