BENIN Work Plan FY 2018 Project Year 7

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

BENIN Work Plan FY 2018 Project Year 7 BENIN Work Plan FY 2018 Project Year 7 October 2017–September 2018 ENVISION is a global project led by RTI International in partnership with CBM International, The Carter Center, Fred Hollows Foundation, Helen Keller International, IMA World Health, Light for the World, Sightsavers, and World Vision. ENVISION is funded by the US Agency for International Development under cooperative agreement No. AID-OAA-A-11-00048. The period of performance for ENVISION is September 30, 2011, through September 30, 2019. The author’s views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the US Agency for International Development or the United States Government. ENVISION Project Overview The US Agency for International Development (USAID)’s ENVISION project (2011–2019) is designed to support the vision of the World Health Organization (WHO) and its member states by targeting the control and elimination of seven neglected tropical diseases (NTDs), including lymphatic filariasis (LF), onchocerciasis (OV), schistosomiasis (SCH), three soil-transmitted helminths (STH; roundworm, whipworm, and hookworm), and trachoma. ENVISION’s goal is to strengthen NTD programming at global and country levels and support ministries of health (MOHs) to achieve their NTD control and elimination goals. At the global level, ENVISION—in close coordination and collaboration with WHO, USAID, and other stakeholders—contributes to several technical areas in support of global NTD control and elimination goals, including the following: • Drug and diagnostics procurement, where global donation programs are unavailable • Capacity strengthening • Management and implementation of ENVISION’s Technical Assistance Facility (TAF) • Disease mapping • NTD policy and technical guideline development • NTD monitoring and evaluation (M&E). At the country level, ENVISION provides support to national NTD programs by providing strategic technical and financial assistance for a comprehensive package of NTD interventions, including the following: • Strategic annual and multi-year planning • Advocacy • Social mobilization and health education • Capacity strengthening • Baseline disease mapping • Preventive chemotherapy (PC) or mass drug administration (MDA) • Drug and commodity supply management and procurement • Program supervision • M&E, including disease-specific assessments (DSAs) and surveillance. In Benin, ENVISION project activities are implemented by RTI International. ENVISION FY18 PY7 Benin Work Plan ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ENVISION Project Overview .......................................................................................................................... ii TABLE OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................................... iv TABLE OF FIGURES ....................................................................................................................................... iv ACRONYMS LIST ............................................................................................................................................ v COUNTRY OVERVIEW .................................................................................................................................... 8 1) General Country Background ............................................................................................................ 8 a) Administrative Structure ........................................................................................................... 8 b) Overview of ENVISION support ................................................................................................. 9 2) National NTD Program Overview .................................................................................................... 10 a) Lymphatic Filariasis ................................................................................................................. 10 b) Trachoma ................................................................................................................................ 12 c) Onchocerciasis ........................................................................................................................ 13 d) Schistosomiasis ....................................................................................................................... 15 e) Soil-Transmitted Helminths .................................................................................................... 16 3) Snapshot of PC NTD Status in Benin ............................................................................................... 18 PLANNED ACTIVITIES ................................................................................................................................... 19 1) NTD Program Capacity Strengthening ............................................................................................ 19 a) Strategic Capacity Strengthening Approach ........................................................................... 19 b) Capacity Strengthening Objectives and Interventions ........................................................... 19 c) Monitoring Capacity Strengthening ........................................................................................ 20 2) Project Assistance ........................................................................................................................... 22 a) Strategic Planning ................................................................................................................... 22 b) NTD Secretariat ....................................................................................................................... 23 c) Building Advocacy for a Sustainable National NTD Program .................................................. 23 d) MDA Coverage ........................................................................................................................ 23 e) Social Mobilization to Enable NTD Program Activities ........................................................... 26 f) Training ................................................................................................................................... 31 g) Drug and Commodity Supply Management and Procurement .............................................. 33 h) Supervision for MDA ............................................................................................................... 34 i) M&E ........................................................................................................................................ 34 j) Supervision for M&E and DSAs ............................................................................................... 35 k) Dossier Development .............................................................................................................. 36 3) Maps................................................................................................................................................ 37 ENVISION FY18 PY7 Benin Work Plan iii APPENDIX 1: Work Plan Timeline................................................................................................................ 41 APPENDIX 2. Table of USAID-supported Regions and Districts in FY18 ...................................................... 43 TABLE OF TABLES Table 1: Snapshot of the expected status of PC NTDs in Benin as of September 30, 2017 ........................ 18 Table 2: Project assistance for capacity strengthening .............................................................................. 21 Table 3: Districts targeted for MDA with USAID support in FY18 ............................................................... 24 Table 4: Social mobilization/communication activities and materials checklist for NTD work planning ... 28 Table 5: Planned DSAs for FY18 by disease ................................................................................................ 35 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1: Organization of the cascade training for the various MDA campaigns ....................................... 32 ENVISION FY18 PY7 Benin Work Plan iv ACRONYMS LIST AE Adverse Event AFRO Regional Office for Africa (WHO) ALB Albendazole APOC African Program for Onchocerciasis Control ATP Annual Transmission Potential AZT Azithromycin CAME Centrale d’Achat des Médicaments Essentiels CDD Community Drug Distributor CDTI Community-Directed Treatment with Ivermectin CES Coverage Evaluation Survey Co-RUP Co-Responsable d’Unité Pédagogique (Pedagogical Unit Deputy Chief) CP Conseiller Pédagogique (Pedagogical Advisor) CRP Chef de Région Pédagogique (Head of School District) DDS Direction Départementale de la Santé (Departmental Health Directorate) D-FEAT District Filariases Elimination Action Tool DFID UK Department for International Development DNSP Direction Nationale de la Santé Publique (National Public Health Directorate) (MOH) DPS Direction de la Promotion de la Scolarisation (Schooling Promotion Directorate) DQA Data Quality Assessment DSA Disease-Specific Assessment DSME Direction de la Santé de la Mère et de l’Enfant (Mother and Child Health Directorate) (MOH) ESPEN Expanded Special Project for Elimination of Neglected Tropical Diseases (WHO AFRO) EU Evaluation Unit FOG Fixed Obligation Grant FTS Filariasis Test Strip FY Fiscal Year GOB Government of Benin GTMP Global Trachoma Mapping Project HAT Human African Trypanosomiasis HQ Headquarters HZ Hôpital de Zone (Health Zone Hospital)
Recommended publications
  • Pdf | 857.14 Kb
    West and Central Africa Regional Office Humanitarian Situation Report © © UNICEF/UN0452608/Dejongh Reporting Period: 1 January to 30 June 2021 Highlights Situation in Numbers • Several countries in West and Central Africa have entered a third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic with case numbers rising to their highest levels 57 million since the start of the outbreak. Continued disruptions to essential services children in need of remain a challenge. humanitarian assistance in • Supporting the continuation of nutrition services in the context of COVID- WCAR (2021 OCHA HNO/HRP of 8 19 remains difficult, as COVID-19 has created barriers to community- countries and 2021 UNICEF HAC for 12 based activities carried out by Community Health Workers including early countries) SAM screening and prevention activities for Infant and Young Child Feeding (IYCF). • Schools have re-opened with many countries offering catch up classes to 350,820 student over the summer. UNICEF continues to scale-up WASH in new COVID-19 cases from schools to promote good health and hygiene. January to June 2021 (two- fold increase) in WCAR • Following the declaration of an Ebola outbreak in Guinea, UNICEF stepped up preparedness activities in six neighbouring countries (Cote 1.4% case fatality rate in d'Ivoire, Liberia, Sierra Leone, Guinea-Bissau, Mali, and Senegal), where WCAR (consolidated data from approximately 40 million people under 18 years of age were at risk. On 19 WHO, MoH as of 30 June) June 2021 Guinea was officially declared Ebola-Free. • The security context has further deteriorated in the first six months of UNICEF Appeal 2021 2021.
    [Show full text]
  • B E N I N Benin
    Birnin o Kebbi !( !( Kardi KANTCHARIKantchari !( !( Pékinga Niger Jega !( Diapaga FADA N'GOUMA o !( (! Fada Ngourma Gaya !( o TENKODOGO !( Guéné !( Madécali Tenkodogo !( Burkina Faso Tou l ou a (! Kende !( Founogo !( Alibori Gogue Kpara !( Bahindi !( TUGA Suroko o AIRSTRIP !( !( !( Yaobérégou Banikoara KANDI o o Koabagou !( PORGA !( Firou Boukoubrou !(Séozanbiani Batia !( !( Loaka !( Nansougou !( !( Simpassou !( Kankohoum-Dassari Tian Wassaka !( Kérou Hirou !( !( Nassoukou Diadia (! Tel e !( !( Tankonga Bin Kébérou !( Yauri Atakora !( Kpan Tanguiéta !( !( Daro-Tempobré Dammbouti !( !( !( Koyadi Guilmaro !( Gambaga Outianhou !( !( !( Borogou !( Tounkountouna Cabare Kountouri Datori !( !( Sécougourou Manta !( !( NATITINGOU o !( BEMBEREKE !( !( Kouandé o Sagbiabou Natitingou Kotoponga !(Makrou Gurai !( Bérasson !( !( Boukombé Niaro Naboulgou !( !( !( Nasso !( !( Kounounko Gbangbanrou !( Baré Borgou !( Nikki Wawa Nambiri Biro !( !( !( !( o !( !( Daroukparou KAINJI Copargo Péréré !( Chin NIAMTOUGOU(!o !( DJOUGOUo Djougou Benin !( Guerin-Kouka !( Babiré !( Afekaul Miassi !( !( !( !( Kounakouro Sheshe !( !( !( Partago Alafiarou Lama-Kara Sece Demon !( !( o Yendi (! Dabogou !( PARAKOU YENDI o !( Donga Aledjo-Koura !( Salamanga Yérémarou Bassari !( !( Jebba Tindou Kishi !( !( !( Sokodé Bassila !( Igbéré Ghana (! !( Tchaourou !( !(Olougbé Shaki Togo !( Nigeria !( !( Dadjo Kilibo Ilorin Ouessé Kalande !( !( !( Diagbalo Banté !( ILORIN (!o !( Kaboua Ajasse Akalanpa !( !( !( Ogbomosho Collines !( Offa !( SAVE Savé !( Koutago o !( Okio Ila Doumé !(
    [Show full text]
  • SUN Countries Deep-Dives Final Report Scaling up Nutrition Movement In-Depth Country Studies
    SUN Countries deep-dives final report Scaling Up Nutrition Movement In-depth Country Studies Annex No 4 – List of interviews and group discussions per country Benin National level interviews were not carried out due to a clash with other SUN Movement Study happening during the same time. However, some information was collected through a group discussion with United Nations representatives. At subnational level information was collected in two municipalities through 10 interviews to government officers (7), and civil society representatives (3); and 3 group discussions that included 17 people participating from government (12), civil society (1). National level • Group discussion with four United Nations Representatives from UNICEF, World Food Program WFP and World Health Organization WHO. Subnational level Group discussions: • Members of the decentralised Multi-Stakeholder Platform (Cadre de Concertation Communal, CCC) of Adja Ouèrè. • Members of the decentralised Multi-Stakeholder Platform (Cadre de Concertation Communal, CCC) of Malanville. • With donor representatives from members of the decentralised Multi-Stakeholder Platform (Cadre de Concertation Communal, CCC) of Adja Ouèrè. Interviews carried out in Adja Ouèrè, Plateau Department: • Head of Planification, Nutrition Focal Point, Adja Ouere Commune. • Regional Coordinator of the Permanent Secretariat of the food and nutrition Council, SP- CAN Ouémé / Plateau. • Two Representatives of the Groupe d'action pour le bien-être familial (GABF), implementing NGOs of the Multisectoral Food, Health and Nutrition Project, PMASN Project. Civil Society Organisation. Interviews carried out in Malanville, Alibori Department: • Two representatives from devolved services from social affairs and from the local authorities. Government. • Representative of the Bach Consulting for Development BCD, implementing NGO of the Multisectoral Food, Health and Nutrition Project, PMASN Project.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Critical Versus Robust Processing Unit Operations
    International Journal of Food Science and Technology 2021, 56, 1311–1321 1311 Original article Identification of critical versus robust processing unit operations determining the physical and biochemical properties of cassava- based semolina (gari) Andres´ Escobar,1,2* Eric Rondet,2 Layal Dahdouh,2,3 Julien Ricci,2,3 Noel¨ Akissoe,´ 4 Dominique Dufour,2,3 Thierry Tran,1,2,3 Bernard Cuq5 & Michele` Delalonde2 1 The Alliance of Bioversity International and the International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), CGIAR Research Program on Roots Tubers and Bananas (RTB), Apartado Aereo´ 6713, Cali, Colombia 2 Qualisud, University of Montpellier, CIRAD, SupAgro, University of Avignon, University of La Reunion,´ 73 rue JF Breton, Montpellier 34398, France 3 CIRAD, UMR Qualisud, F-34398, Montpellier, France 4 Faculty of Agronomical Sciences, University of Abomey Calavi, Cotonou, Benin 5 UMR IATE, CIRAD, INRA, University of Montpellier, Montpellier SupAgro, Montpellier, France (Received 3 August 2020; Accepted in revised form 13 October 2020) Summary The gari-making process involves several unit operations (U.O.), some of which strongly influence the quality of the end product. Two contrasting process scales (laboratory-scale vs conventional) were com- pared in order to identify which U.O. were affected by the change of scale. U.O. that changed end-pro- duct characteristics depending on process scale were deemed critical; whereas U.O. that resulted in similar characteristics were deemed robust. The classification depended on quality attributes considered: rasping and roasting were critical for physical properties, in particular particle size which ranged from 0.44 to 0.89 mm between the two process scales; and robust for biochemical properties.
    [Show full text]
  • GIEWS Country Brief Benin
    GIEWS Country Brief Benin Reference Date: 23-April-2020 FOOD SECURITY SNAPSHOT Planting of 2020 main season maize ongoing in south under normal moisture conditions Above-average 2019 cereal crop harvested Prices of coarse grains overall stable in March Pockets of food insecurity persist Start of 2020 cropping season in south follows timely onset of rains Following the timely onset of seasonal rains in the south, planting of yams was completed in March, while planting of the main season maize crop is ongoing and will be completed by the end of April. The harvest of yams is expected to start in July, while harvesting operations of maize will start in August. Planting of rice crops, to be harvested from August, is underway. The cumulative rainfall amounts since early March have been average to above average in most planted areas and supported the development of yams and maize crops, which are at sprouting, seedling and tillering stages. Weeding activities are normally taking place in most cropped areas. In the north, seasonal dry weather conditions are still prevailing and planting operations for millet and sorghum, to be harvested from October, are expected to begin in May-June with the onset of the rains. In April, despite the ongoing pastoral lean season, forage availability was overall satisfactory in the main grazing areas of the country. The seasonal movement of domestic livestock, returning from the south to the north, started in early March following the normal onset of the rains in the south. The animal health situation is generally good and stable, with just some localized outbreaks of seasonal diseases, including Trypanosomiasis and Contagious Bovine Peripneumonia.
    [Show full text]
  • MCA-Benin's ‘Access to Land’ Project and Its Aftermath
    BENIN INSTITUTIONAL DIAGNOSTIC WP19/BID08 CHAPTER 7: HISTORY AND POLITICAL ECONOMY OF LAND ADMINISTRATION REFORM IN BENIN Philippe Lavigne Delville French National Research Institute for Sustainable Development, With discussion by Kenneth Houngbedji Paris School of Economics August 2019 History and Political Economy of Land Administration Reform in Benin Table of contents Acronyms ii 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Land reforms in Africa, between the privatisation paradigm and the adaptation paradigm 1 1.2 Understanding the political economy of an ongoing reform: a process-tracing approach 4 2 State ownership, informality, semi-formal arrangements and ‘confusion management’: a brief analysis of the land sector in the early 2000s 6 2.1 Institutional weaknesses and semi-formal arrangements 6 2.2 Land governance, between neo-customary regulations, the market, and semi- formal systems 10 2.3 ‘Managing confusion’ 13 2.4 Institutional bottlenecks before reforms: a tentative synthesis 15 3 The search for overall/sectorial adjustment in the land sector in the years 1990– 2000: a telescoping of reforms 16 3.1 The emergence of the land issue in the 1990s 16 3.2 In urban areas, tax experiments and unsuccessful discussions on legal reform 16 3.3 In rural areas, the PFRs and the draft rural land law: the construction of an alternative to land title 17 3.4 In the mid-2000s: the MCA-Benin and the emergence of a global reform project 20 4 Extend access to land title through a deep reform of land administration: MCA- Benin's ‘Access to Land’ project and its aftermath
    [Show full text]
  • Read More About SDG Bond Framework
    1 C1 - Public Natixis Summary FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................................... 3 ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................... 4 PART I: Benin mobilised for the 2030 Agenda ....................................................................................... 5 1. The basics about the Republic of Benin .......................................................................................... 5 1.1 Political and administrative organisation of Benin ..................................................................... 6 1.2 A predominately young and rural population ............................................................................. 6 1.3 Human development indicators are improving .......................................................................... 8 1.4 Benin’s economic structure ........................................................................................................ 8 1.5 The authorities’ response to the Covid-19 pandemic ................................................................ 9 2. Actions and policies closely anchored to the 2030 Agenda .......................................................... 11 2.1 Actions for taking ownership of the 2030 Agenda ................................................................... 11 2.2 Mobilising institutions and transforming public action to reach the SDGs ..............................
    [Show full text]
  • Zomi" in Southern Benin
    Int. J. Biosci. 2019 International Journal of Biosciences | IJB | ISSN: 2220-6655 (Print), 2222-5234 (Online) http://www.innspub.net Vol. 14, No. 2, p. 24-39, 2019 RESEARCH PAPER OPEN ACCESS Technological study of different traditional processes used in the production of flavored palm oil "zomi" in southern Benin Alexandrine H. Bokossa1,2, Durand Dah Nouvlessounon3, Euloge S. Adjou1, Brice Kpatinvoh1, Christian T.R. Konfo1, Edwige Dahouenon-Ahoussi1*, Mohamed M. Soumanou1, Paulin Azokpota2 1Laboratory of Study and Research in Applied Chemistry, Department of Food Technology Engineering, Polytechnic School of Abomey-Calavi, University of Abomey-Calavi, Cotonou, Benin 2Laboratory of Food Sciences, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Abomey-Calavi Cotonou, Benin 3Laboratory of Biology and Molecular Typing in Microbiology, Department of Biochemistry, Sciences and Technologies Faculty, University of Abomey-Calavi,, Cotonou, Benin Key words: Traditional processes, Technology, Production, " zomi ". http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/14.2.24-39 Article published on February 12, 20199 Abstract Producers who still want to get a lot of oil change the production of palm oil each day. Two types of red palm oils are produced with the fruits of the palm tree (Elaeis guineensis). These are the standard palm oil and flavored quality palm oil whose different production technologies are purely traditional. This study aims to make a technological study of the different technologies used to produce "zomi" flavored palm oil in the high production areas in Benin. For this reason, a questionnaire was used to ask each of 220 "zomi" producers in four (4) departments.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Appendix to “Can Informed Public Deliberation Overcome Clientelism? Experimental Evidence from Benin”
    Online Appendix to “Can Informed Public Deliberation Overcome Clientelism? Experimental Evidence from Benin” by Thomas Fujiwara and Leonard Wantchekon 1. List of Sample Villages Table A1 provides a list of sample villages, with their experimental and dominant can- didates. 2. Results by Commune/Stratum Table A2.1-A2.3 presents the results by individual commune/stratum. 3. Survey Questions and the Clientelism Index Table A3.1 provides the estimates for each individual component of the clientelism index, while Table A3.2 details the questions used in the index. 4. Treatment Effects on Candidate Vote Shares Table A4 provides the treatment effect on each individual candidate vote share. 5. Estimates Excluding Communes where Yayi is the EC Table A5 reports results from estimations that drop the six communes where Yayi is the EC. Panel A provides estimates analogous from those of Table 2, while Panels B and C report estimates that are similar to those of Table 3. The point estimates are remarkably similar to the original ones, even though half the sample has been dropped (which explains why some have a slight reduction in significance). 1 6. Estimates Including the Commune of Toffo Due to missing survey data, all the estimates presented in the main paper exclude the commune of Toffo, the only one where Amoussou is the EC. However, electoral data for this commune is available. This allows us to re-estimate the electoral data-based treatment effects including the commune. Table A6.1 re-estimates the results presented on Panel B of Table 2. The qualitative results remain the same.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte D'ivoire, and Togo
    Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Public Disclosure Authorized Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon Public Disclosure Authorized 00000_CVR_English.indd 1 12/6/17 2:29 PM November 2017 The Geography of Welfare in Benin, Burkina Faso, Côte d’Ivoire, and Togo Nga Thi Viet Nguyen and Felipe F. Dizon 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 1 11/29/17 3:34 PM Photo Credits Cover page (top): © Georges Tadonki Cover page (center): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Cover page (bottom): © Curt Carnemark/World Bank Page 1: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 7: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 15: © Adrian Turner/Flickr Page 32: © Dominic Chavez/World Bank Page 48: © Arne Hoel/World Bank Page 56: © Ami Vitale/World Bank 00000_Geography_Welfare-English.indd 2 12/6/17 3:27 PM Acknowledgments This study was prepared by Nga Thi Viet Nguyen The team greatly benefited from the valuable and Felipe F. Dizon. Additional contributions were support and feedback of Félicien Accrombessy, made by Brian Blankespoor, Michael Norton, and Prosper R. Backiny-Yetna, Roy Katayama, Rose Irvin Rojas. Marina Tolchinsky provided valuable Mungai, and Kané Youssouf. The team also thanks research assistance. Administrative support by Erick Herman Abiassi, Kathleen Beegle, Benjamin Siele Shifferaw Ketema is gratefully acknowledged. Billard, Luc Christiaensen, Quy-Toan Do, Kristen Himelein, Johannes Hoogeveen, Aparajita Goyal, Overall guidance for this report was received from Jacques Morisset, Elisée Ouedraogo, and Ashesh Andrew L. Dabalen. Prasann for their discussion and comments. Joanne Gaskell, Ayah Mahgoub, and Aly Sanoh pro- vided detailed and careful peer review comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for USAID/Benin's HIV/AIDS Strategy 2006–2013
    PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION NOT FOR PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL JANUARY 2009 Recommendations for USAID/Benin’s HIV/AIDS Strategy 2006–2013 Prepared by Dr. Souleymane Barry, Team Leader, The Synergy Project Dr. Leon Kessou, Consultant Dr. Sennen Hounton, Consultant Submitted to U.S. Agency for International Development Cotonou, Benin Submitted by The Synergy Project TvT Global Health and Development Strategies™ A division of Social & Scientific Systems, Inc. 1101 Vermont Avenue, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20005, USA Telephone: (202) 842-2939 Fax: (202) 842-7646 USAID Contract: HRN-C-00-99-00005-00 January 2004 PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION This work was supported by The Synergy Project, through USAID contract HRN-C-00-99-00005-00. The interpretations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of Social & Scientific Systems, Inc., or the United States Agency for International Development. PROCUREMENT SENSITIVE INFORMATION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS We appreciate the excellent support of USAID/Benin staff, Nicodeme Conde in particular, in completing this important assignment. Mr. Conde provided important insights and facilitated our contacts with organizations and resource persons. He also accompanied us during consultations in Cotonou and other cities. We are grateful for the warm welcome and collaboration demonstrated by The National HIV/AIDS Control Program (NACP) in the Ministry of Health, and by regional and district authorities, USAID implementing partners and other development partners, religious leaders, and local nongovernmental organizations. The team is particular pleased with the dedicated support and collaboration demonstrated by Dr. Valentine Medegan-Kiki, Deputy Director and Chief Epidemiologist at NACP. Finally, we thank Synergy staff members Deanna Crouse, Gary Merritt, Ruth Hope, and Joshua Rosenfeld for their contributions, support, and patience.
    [Show full text]
  • Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-Cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”
    Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin” Project evaluation series Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of persistent organic pollutants and obsolete pesticides and strengthening life-cycle management of pesticides in Benin” GCP/BEN/056/GFF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Rome, 2019 Required citation: FAO. 2019. Mid-term evaluation of “Disposal of Persistent Organic Pollutants and Obsolete Pesticides and Strengthening Life-cycle Management of Pesticides in Benin”. Rome. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO, 2019 Some rights reserved. This work is made available under the Creative Commons Attribution- NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO licence (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO; https://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo/legalcode/legalcode). Under the terms of this licence, this work may be copied, redistributed and adapted for non-commercial purposes, provided that the work is appropriately cited.
    [Show full text]