DOCSLIB.ORG

By: Justin Mccarthy, Audrey Howard, Parsia Hedayat Before We Talk About Justinian I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
By: Justin Mccarthy, Audrey Howard, Parsia Hedayat Before We Talk About Justinian I Eastern Roman Empire (Byzantine Empire) By: Justin McCarthy, Audrey Howard, Parsia Hedayat Before we talk about Justinian I The story of Justinian I starts with his uncle, Justin. Justin was a farmer who knew Latin in Greek-owned society. Justin and Justinian, Flavias Petrus Sabbatius, moved to Byzantium. When going there, Justin joined the army and quickly had earned better and better ranks. When moving to Byzantium, he gave Flaviss Petrus Sabbatius the best education possible. Sabbatius took on his uncles name, Justinianus, or as we know him, Justinian. After the death of Anastasius, there was no one to rule. Justin was head of the imperial court and used bribe money to convince the senate to agree with his votes. Justin was now the ruler, With no education. Justinian sought out to help in uncle in peril by making peace with many people, such as prisoners of Anastasiuss' reign. Justinian was also involved with the assassination of a popular general, Vitallium. How Justinian I met Theodora Theodora was a actor/prostitute who supported of the blue demes (chariot racing team of Constantinople). Through the political affect of demes, even highest of powers would meet the lowest of classes. When meeting, the two had fallen in love, but couldn’t get married due to a law not allowing those in government to marry actresses or prostitutes or other degrading jobs at the time. Justin's wife wouldn’t allow Justin to condemn this law. But shortly after her death, the two got married and the law was removed from the books Resurgence Under Justinian I • Justinian Code One of the most known books written by Justinian I was Corpus Juris Civilis ( or Body of Civil Laws) and is referred to as The Code of Justinian Was issued from 529 to 533 B.C. Was used to define laws of the Eastern Roman Empire and was the structure for many modern-day laws The Rising Power of Justinian I After the death of Justin on August 1st of 527 B.C.E., Justinian became ruler of the Byzantine empire. He quickly got to work on making a newer empire. Due to riots caused from two people who survived death by getting hung, many people turned against Justinian I because he still wanted those two people dead. He eventually had his financial advisor help him slither his way out of a riot that ended up burning many parts of Constantinople. Justinian now needed to rebuild the burned city Reconquering the West To do so, Justinian needed to start in North Africa, which was able to stay stable and wealthy. North Africa was run by pirates, raiders and 'Kings of the Seas' after Vandals invaded in the 430s. Eventually many islands fell to Vandal powers. In 455 B.C.E., the Vandals went to war with the Romans. In 468, the Romans went to war with the Vandals and won. After this event, Rome had uneasy terms with the Vandals that Justinian wanted to resolve. Another war broke out with Vandals against the Romans, the Tripolitania and Sardinia. As the king of Vandals saw his two brothers die in battle, attempting to help, the king of Vandals lost. Justinian was able to restore Africa to the empire and restore power to Rome Finishing the Undone Job Justinian has finally captured Africa and restored all power to the Roman Empire, but something was missing, Rome itself. Rome wasn’t part of the Roman Empire and this made Justinian mad. Justinian gets a note informing him that the empress of his ruling neighbors was dead, giving Justinian a sign to reclaim Rome. Justinian orders his loyal general, Belisarius, to sail 7,500 men to Italy and reclaim Rome. After weeks on edge, Justinian waits for a letter to inform him of success. Meanwhile, Belisarius was moving in on the many cities, but gets a letter saying the African troops were in revolt. If Belisarius didn’t go to Africa, everything they fought for would be lost and Justinian was in complete utter rage. After returning to Ital to reclaim Rome, Belisarius was left with one of two decisions. Abandon the siege he laid on Neapolis to claim Rome or keep fighting Neapolis. Belisarius couldn’t leave half way through to reclaim Rome. There also wasn’t enough men to do so. Finishing the Undone Job (cont.) Later throughout the week, a barbarian soldier finds a pipe that could potentially fit a man and confronts this information to Belisarius. With out a second to spare, Belisarius thinks of a plan. He orders a large majority of his troops to make a distraction and stay alive. He also orders a few men to follow the barbaric soldier. While having the soldiers distract without confrontation, 5 engineers open the pipe to be larger. Belisarius makes a polite letter convincing Neapolis to surrender or face the consequences. Neapolis in ruins means onward to Rome, making Justinian joyous. With the blessing of the Pope himself, Belisarius will claim what was once rightfully Rome's. On December 10th, 533 B.C., Rome was once again owned by Romans. Finishing the Undone Job (cont.) If Rome was going to survive in enemy territory, they would need to be defensive. After surviving throughout the harsh winter, Belisarius felt something wasn’t right. Those defending the Roman borders fled and the Ostrogoths invaded Rome. The general of the Ostrogoths shouts to fire at the 'White-Faced Bay.' If it weren't for the strength of his shield and armor, Belisarius would lay dead. Belisarius fought men after men, getting covered in blood and gore. Belisarius goes to Rome and tells the guards to advance to the gates, but the Romans didn’t recognize him due to mud and blood. The pursuing Ostrogoths advance closer, not expecting an attack and out of formation and wipe them out. Ostrogoth soldiers destroy the only running water in city boundaries through a river, leaving no food for the soldiers. When Belisarius finds a way to solve the solution, Ostrogoths counter it. But with his wit, Belisarius counters their counter. More Ostrogoths come to the city with giant machines of war pulled by oxen. Belisarius simply laughs and draws fire at some oxen. Belisarius orders men to kill the oxen. This destroyed the main assault. He destroys the remaining incoming armies and wins Rome. Finishing the Job (cont.) The oncoming Ostrogoths may a 3- month peace treaty. Within these 3 months, Belisarius restocked on many supplies and remade an army. After an surprise attack that had failed, the Ostrogoths finally surrendered and left ruin of all their camps. As Ostrogoths retreat, Belisarius orders his men to finish the remaining Ostrogoths and make Justinian's dream finally come true. Religious Disputes Monophysites Iconoclasm • The belief that Jesus Definition of Iconoclasm: Two periods of time in was the only the Byzantine Empire (730-787 and 814-842) When subordinary human. No emperors imposed bans on religious images/icons more and no less No "graven images" (sculptures) of • Theodora, religious figures. Icon controversy resolved in Justinian's wife temporarily with pictures but no statues. believed in this idea Rival Parties within Empire: • Belief Jesus was/is Iconoclasts:(against icons) vs. Iconophiles: (in favor 100% divine of icons) Involved Byzantine Christians vs. Islamic Religion All Sources • https://sourcebooks.fordham.edu/source/icono-cncl754.asp Definition of iconoclastic council. https://www.google.com/search?source=hp&q=define+monophysites&oq=define+monophysites&gs_l=psy- ab.3..0i22i30k1.7235.14386.0.14640.19.19.0.0.0.0.87.1319.19.19.0....0...1.1.64.psy- ab..0.19.1316...0j0i131k1.0.TE4ffq-P9Mw Provides the definition of Monophysite https://www.bing.com/search?q=what+is+the+justinian+code&form=EDGEAR&qs=SC&cvid=23d6c5d6697c 46c58de6ff12511cbc64&cc=US&setlang=en-US&PC=DCTS Explanation of Justin and Justinian I: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_2E0RxVHH4 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eGL_M1SQV5E https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_NpDvBX2XEI https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oakBpmsJJ9Q https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0W8wIAV1Pu4 All Sources (cont.) • http://www.thelatinlibrary.com/justinian.html digital copy of Corpus Juris Civilis • https://books.google.com/books?id=Ei2w5sZm3nQC&printsec=frontcover#v=onepage& q&f=false Corpus Juris Civilis translated, but small font.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the D
    The Politics of Roman Memory in the Age of Justinian DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Marion Woodrow Kruse, III Graduate Program in Greek and Latin The Ohio State University 2015 Dissertation Committee: Anthony Kaldellis, Advisor; Benjamin Acosta-Hughes; Nathan Rosenstein Copyright by Marion Woodrow Kruse, III 2015 ABSTRACT This dissertation explores the use of Roman historical memory from the late fifth century through the middle of the sixth century AD. The collapse of Roman government in the western Roman empire in the late fifth century inspired a crisis of identity and political messaging in the eastern Roman empire of the same period. I argue that the Romans of the eastern empire, in particular those who lived in Constantinople and worked in or around the imperial administration, responded to the challenge posed by the loss of Rome by rewriting the history of the Roman empire. The new historical narratives that arose during this period were initially concerned with Roman identity and fixated on urban space (in particular the cities of Rome and Constantinople) and Roman mythistory. By the sixth century, however, the debate over Roman history had begun to infuse all levels of Roman political discourse and became a major component of the emperor Justinian’s imperial messaging and propaganda, especially in his Novels. The imperial history proposed by the Novels was aggressivley challenged by other writers of the period, creating a clear historical and political conflict over the role and import of Roman history as a model or justification for Roman politics in the sixth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire
    HUNNIC WARFARE IN THE FOURTH AND FIFTH CENTURIES C.E.: ARCHERY AND THE COLLAPSE OF THE WESTERN ROMAN EMPIRE A Thesis Submitted to the Committee of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the Faculty of Arts and Science. TRENT UNIVERSITY Peterborough, Ontario, Canada © Copyright by Laura E. Fyfe 2016 Anthropology M.A. Graduate Program January 2017 ABSTRACT Hunnic Warfare in the Fourth and Fifth Centuries C.E.: Archery and the Collapse of the Western Roman Empire Laura E. Fyfe The Huns are one of the most misunderstood and mythologized barbarian invaders encountered by the Roman Empire. They were described by their contemporaries as savage nomadic warriors with superior archery skills, and it is this image that has been written into the history of the fall of the Western Roman Empire and influenced studies of Late Antiquity through countless generations of scholarship. This study examines evidence of Hunnic archery, questions the acceptance and significance of the “Hunnic archer” image, and situates Hunnic archery within the context of the fall of the Western Roman Empire. To achieve a more accurate picture of the importance of archery in Hunnic warfare and society, this study undertakes a mortuary analysis of burial sites associated with the Huns in Europe, a tactical and logistical study of mounted archery and Late Roman and Hunnic military engagements, and an analysis of the primary and secondary literature. Keywords: Archer, Archery, Army, Arrow, Barbarian, Bow, Burial Assemblages, Byzantine, Collapse, Composite Bow, Frontier, Hun, Logistics, Migration Period, Roman, Roman Empire, Tactics, Weapons Graves ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would first like to thank my thesis advisor, Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK for GRADES 7-12 Belisarius
    BELISARIUS BIOGRAPHY WORKBOOK FOR GRADES 7-12 Belisarius BELISARIUS (505-565 C.E.) Few men have performed Emperor Justinian, was an equally greater achievements than this remarkable personage, capable of general, to whom it was given to be conceiving and accomplishing conqueror again and again over magnificent designs, yet withal of a nations hitherto invincible, and to mean, ungenerous, ungrateful arrest, during his own lifetime, the character. Justinian was responsible disintegration of the Roman Empire. for the codification (under He lived in the early part of the sixth Christianized conditions) of the old century of the Christian era, though Roman law (known as the Justinian the date of his birth is not certainly Code), so as to serve as the foundation known, and he was in the prime of life of jurisprudence to all the European about 530. Belisarius is believed to nations except the English; the have been the son of a peasant of building of the church of St. Sophia Thrace, probably of Slavonian descent, (Hagia Sophia); and the rolling back as his name, stripped of its classical for a time the flood that on all sides form, would belong to that language was overwhelming the ancient Empire and would be Beli-than, or the White of Rome, were all due to this prince. Prince. 2. Who ruled as emperor of the 1. Describe Belisarius’ father. Eastern Roman (Byzantine) ____________________________________ Empire during the life of ____________________________________ Belisarius? ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ ____________________________________ For the last two centuries, the Apparently he began life as a Eastern and the Western Roman common soldier, and gradually rose by empires had been separated, though courage and ability.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (Ca
    Conversion and Empire: Byzantine Missionaries, Foreign Rulers, and Christian Narratives (ca. 300-900) by Alexander Borislavov Angelov A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy (History) in The University of Michigan 2011 Doctoral Committee: Professor John V.A. Fine, Jr., Chair Professor Emeritus H. Don Cameron Professor Paul Christopher Johnson Professor Raymond H. Van Dam Associate Professor Diane Owen Hughes © Alexander Borislavov Angelov 2011 To my mother Irina with all my love and gratitude ii Acknowledgements To put in words deepest feelings of gratitude to so many people and for so many things is to reflect on various encounters and influences. In a sense, it is to sketch out a singular narrative but of many personal “conversions.” So now, being here, I am looking back, and it all seems so clear and obvious. But, it is the historian in me that realizes best the numerous situations, emotions, and dilemmas that brought me where I am. I feel so profoundly thankful for a journey that even I, obsessed with planning, could not have fully anticipated. In a final analysis, as my dissertation grew so did I, but neither could have become better without the presence of the people or the institutions that I feel so fortunate to be able to acknowledge here. At the University of Michigan, I first thank my mentor John Fine for his tremendous academic support over the years, for his friendship always present when most needed, and for best illustrating to me how true knowledge does in fact produce better humanity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Developmentof Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrachs to The
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Birmingham Research Archive, E-theses Repository University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. The Development of Early Imperial Dress from the Tetrarchs to the Herakleian Dynasty General Introduction The emperor, as head of state, was the most important and powerful individual in the land; his official portraits and to a lesser extent those of the empress were depicted throughout the realm. His image occurred most frequently on small items issued by government officials such as coins, market weights, seals, imperial standards, medallions displayed beside new consuls, and even on the inkwells of public officials. As a sign of their loyalty, his portrait sometimes appeared on the patches sown on his supporters’ garments, embossed on their shields and armour or even embellishing their jewelry. Among more expensive forms of art, the emperor’s portrait appeared in illuminated manuscripts, mosaics, and wall paintings such as murals and donor portraits. Several types of statues bore his likeness, including those worshiped as part of the imperial cult, examples erected by public 1 officials, and individual or family groupings placed in buildings, gardens and even harbours at the emperor’s personal expense.
    [Show full text]
  • Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages
    Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto © Copyright by Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler 2018 Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages Nicholas Brett Sivulka Wheeler Doctor of Philosophy Centre for Medieval Studies University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This dissertation, ‘Perjury and False Witness in Late Antiquity and the Early Middle Ages’, investigates changing perceptions of perjury and false witness in the late antique and early medieval world. Focusing on primary sources from the Latin-speaking, western Roman empire and former empire, approximately between the late third and seventh centuries CE, this thesis proposes that perjury and false witness were transformed into criminal behaviours, grave sins, and canonical offences in Latin legal and religious writings of the period. Chapter 1, ‘Introduction: The Problem of Perjury’s Criminalization’, calls attention to anomalies in the history and historiography of the oath. Although the oath has been well studied, oath violations have not; moreover, important sources for medieval culture – Roman law and the Christian New Testament – were largely silent on the subject of perjury. For classicists in particular, perjury was not a crime, while oath violations remained largely peripheral to early Christian ethical discussions. Chapter 2, ‘Criminalization: Perjury and False Witness in Late Roman Law’, begins to explain how this situation changed by documenting early possible instances of penalization for perjury. Diverse sources such as Christian martyr acts, provincial law manuals, and select imperial ii and post-imperial legislation suggest that numerous cases of perjury were criminalized in practice.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Heretical Self-Defence in the Middle Ages
    Heretical Self-Defence in the Middle Ages: Text, Law, Subterfuge, Flight and Arms University of Nottingham Abstracts Session 1: Late-antique and early-medieval Models ‘North African Donatism: Fighting against the heretical assimilation’ Carles Buenecasa Perez, University of Barcelona Donatism was nothing but a schism, and its theology was not so different from Catholicism. That’s why, in Africa, Donatism was widely widespread. Catholic bishops decided that, demonstrating to the emperors that Donatism was an heresy, they could impose on Donatists the strict legislation against heretics. Augustine of Hippo has played a significant role in this process, and the arguments he used were multiple. First of all, the bishop of Hippo developed thelogical and ecclesiological concepts, like the uselessness of the baptism given by those who are out of the Church, the lack of theological fundament for rebaptism, etc. Equally, he carried out a deep historical research to remind the Donatists the origins of their own schism (several lies behind the election of Cecilianus, the innocence of Felix of Abthugni...), and to denounce Donatists’s violences (the rupture of ecclesiastical unity, circoncellions’s assassinations...). Then, once Catholic bishops had proved the heretical condition of Donatism, imperial power could promulgate several edicts for its repression from 405. Donatists felt very mistreated by their opponents so they reacted in many and diverse ways. The only problem is that most of our sources are the Catholic ones, so there are not too much objectives. Augustine insists in the fact that the main Donatist reaction was violence agaisnt catholics, but can we really admit this? ‘Gottschalk of Orbais: the quest for Gottschalk’s models’ Bojana Radovanović, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Institut für Mittelalterforschung ‘Heretical self-defence in the Pseudo-Dionysius’ Alan P.
    [Show full text]
  • OPUS IMPERFECTUM AUGUSTINE and HIS READERS, 426-435 A.D. by MARK VESSEY on the Fifth Day Before the Kalends of September [In
    OPUS IMPERFECTUM AUGUSTINE AND HIS READERS, 426-435 A.D. BY MARK VESSEY On the fifth day before the Kalends of September [in the thirteenth consulship of the emperor 'Theodosius II and the third of Valcntinian III], departed this life the bishop Aurelius Augustinus, most excellent in all things, who at the very end of his days, amid the assaults of besieging Vandals, was replying to I the books of Julian and persevcring glorioi.islyin the defence of Christian grace.' The heroic vision of Augustine's last days was destined to a long life. Projected soon after his death in the C,hronicleof Prosper of Aquitaine, reproduccd in the legendary biographies of the Middle Ages, it has shaped the ultimate or penultimate chapter of more than one modern narrative of the saint's career.' And no wonder. There is something very compelling about the picture of the aged bishop recumbent against the double onslaught of the heretical monster Julian and an advancing Vandal army, the ex- tremity of his plight and writerly perseverance enciphering once more the unfathomable mystery of grace and the disproportion of human and divine enterprises. In the chronicles of the earthly city, the record of an opus mag- num .sed imperfectum;in the numberless annals of eternity, thc perfection of God's work in and through his servant Augustine.... As it turned out, few observers at the time were able to abide by this providential explicit and Prosper, despite his zeal for combining chronicle ' Prosper, Epitomachronicon, a. 430 (ed. Mommsen, MGH, AA 9, 473). Joseph McCabe, .SaintAugustine and His Age(London 1902) 427: "Whilst the Vandals thundered at the walls Augustine was absorbed in his great refutation of the Pelagian bishop of Lclanum, Julian." Other popular biographers prefer the penitential vision of Possidius, hita Augustini31,1-2.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,231,386 B1 W (45) Date of Patent: May 15, 2001
    USOO6231386B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,231,386 B1 W (45) Date of Patent: May 15, 2001 (54) ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR WITH 5,385,478 1/1995 Kiekawa .............................. 439/570 IMPROVED SOLDER PADS 5,591,047 1/1997 Yamada et al. ...................... 439/570 5,704,807 1/1998 Sherman et al. ..................... 439/570 (75) Inventor: Kun-Tsan Wu, Tu-Chen (TW) 6,007,352 12/1999 Azuma et al. ....................... 439/570 6,012,949 1/2000 Lok ...................................... 439/570 (73) Assignee: Hon Hai Precision Ind. Co., Ltd., * cited by examiner Taipei Hsien (TW) Primary Examiner-Gary F. Paumen (*) Notice: Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this (74) Attorney, Agent, or Firm Wei Te Chung patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. (57) ABSTRACT An electrical connector includes an insulative housing, a (21) Appl. No.: 09/474,322 pair of contacts and a pair of L-shaped Solder pads received in the insulative housing, respectively. The housing defines (22) Filed: Dec. 29, 1999 a pair of T-shaped channels Spaced from each other in a (51) Int. Cl." ..................................................... H01R 13/73 bottom portion thereof. Each T-shaped channel includes a (52) U.S. Cl. .............................................................. 439/570 groove and a receSS laterally eXposing to the groove. Each (58) Field of Search ..................................... 439/570-572 L-shaped Solder pad includes a first portion and a Second 439'83 portion being generally perpendicular to each other. A pro trusion is embossed in a Surface of the first portion of each (56) References Cited Solder pad.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoffrey Greatrex the EARLY YEARS of JUSTIN
    ELECTRUM * Vol. 12 KrakOw 2007 Geoffrey Greatrex THE EARLY YEARS OF JUSTIN I’S REIGN IN THE SOURCES (1) The ‘conspiracy’ of Amantius, July 518 In the night of 8—9 July 518 the aged emperor Anastasius died during a violent storm. On the following day, 9 July, the magister ofJiciorum Celer gathered together the other high palace officials to deliberate and choose another emperor. After some dispute, as the De Ceremonils relates, Justin proved to be the oniy candidate upon whom all could agree and he was duly elected and crowned. Just one week later the patriarch John was obliged by an excited Constantinopolitan crowd to hold a service in honour of the Fathers of Chalcedon. At the end of the service, those in attendance started to cry out condemnations of those who opposed the council, among whom they named Amantius, the praeposrtus sacri cubicuti, 2 On the said to be th new Tzumas, i.e. an influential eunuch opposed to Chalcedon. following day, or at the latest by 18 July, Amantius was dead, executed along with several his 3 Most sources claim that Amantius had been attempting to secure the of associates. throne for his domesticus Theocritus and that it was for this reason that he and his followers4 were killed, and this is what is generally accepted in detailed treatments of Justin’s reign. A closer examination of the sources, however, throws up certain problems and suggests that Details in Vasiliev 1950: 68—73, and De Cerernoniis, vol. 1, ed. J. Reiske (Bonn, 1829) 1.93. Malalas, Chronographia, 17.1, places the start of Justin’s reign on 9 July, whereas Cyril of Scythopolis, Vita Sabae, ed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geopolitics on the Silk Road
    109 The Geopolitics on the Silk Road: Resurveying the Relationship of the Western Türks with Byzantium through Their Diplomatic Communications Li Qiang, Stefanos Kordosis* The geopolitics pertaining to the Silk Road network in the period from the 6th to the 7th cen- tury (the final, albeit important, period of Late Antiquity) was intertwined with highly strate- gic dimensions.1 The frequent arrival of hoards of nomadic peoples from inner Eurasia at the borders of the existing sedentary empires and their encounters and interactions formed the complicated political ecology of the period. These empires attempted to take advantage of the newly shaped situation arising after such great movements strategically, each in their own interest. How did they achieve their goals and what problems were they confronted with? In this paper, I will focus on the relations the Western Türks had with Byzantium and use it as an example in order to resurvey these complicated geopolitics. In the first part, attention will be given to the collection of Byzantine literature concerning the Western Türks. Then, on the basis of the sources, the four main exchanges of delegations between the Western Türks and Byzantium will be discussed, in which the important status of the 563 embassy – as it was the first Türk delegation sent to Byzantium – will be emphasized. The possible motives behind the dispatch of the delegations and the repercussions they had will be presented. Finally, through reviewing the diplomatic communication between the Western Türks and Byzantium, attention will be turned to the general picture of geopolitics along the Silk Road, claiming that the great empire of the West – similar to today’s superpowers – by means of their resources (mainly diplomacy) manipulated the geopolitics on the Silk Road, especially the nomadic people pursuing their own survival and interests, who were only treated as piec- es on a chessboard for keeping the balance with the rest of the superpowers.
    [Show full text]