DOCSLIB.ORG

NICE Guideline. Urinary Tract Infection (Lower): Antimicrobial Prescribing

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
NICE Guideline. Urinary Tract Infection (Lower): Antimicrobial Prescribing National Institute for Health and Care Excellence APG Urinary tract infection (lower): draft for consultation Urinary tract infection (lower): antimicrobial prescribing guideline Evidence review April 2018 Draft for Consultation Commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents Disclaimer The recommendations in this guideline represent the view of NICE, arrived at after careful consideration of the evidence available. When exercising their judgement, professionals are expected to take this guideline fully into account, alongside the individual needs, preferences and values of their patients or service users. The recommendations in this guideline are not mandatory and the guideline does not override the responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or their carer or guardian. Local commissioners and/or providers have a responsibility to enable the guideline to be applied when individual health professionals and their patients or service users wish to use it. They should do so in the context of local and national priorities for funding and developing services, and in light of their duties to have due regard to the need to eliminate unlawful discrimination, to advance equality of opportunity and to reduce health inequalities. Nothing in this guideline should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties. NICE guidelines cover health and care in England. Decisions on how they apply in other UK countries are made by ministers in the Welsh Government, Scottish Government, and Northern Ireland Executive. All NICE guidance is subject to regular review and may be updated or withdrawn. Copyright © NICE 2018. All rights reserved. Subject to Notice of rights. ISBN: DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents Contents Contents .............................................................................................................................. 4 1 Context .......................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 Background ........................................................................................................... 7 1.2 Managing infections that require antibiotics ........................................................... 9 1.2.1 Self-care .................................................................................................... 9 1.2.2 Back-up prescribing strategies ................................................................... 9 1.2.3 Antibiotic prescribing strategies .................................................................. 9 1.3 Safety netting advice ........................................................................................... 10 1.4 Symptoms and signs of a more serious illness or condition (red flags) ................ 11 2 Evidence selection ..................................................................................................... 12 2.1 Literature search ................................................................................................. 12 2.2 Summary of included studies............................................................................... 12 3 Clinical effectiveness ................................................................................................. 20 3.1 Non-pharmacological interventions in adults ....................................................... 20 3.1.1 Cranberry products .................................................................................. 20 3.1.2 Other non-pharmacological interventions ................................................. 20 3.2 Non-antimicrobial pharmacological interventions in adults ................................... 21 3.2.1 Oral analgesia .......................................................................................... 21 3.3 Antimicrobials in non-pregnant women ................................................................ 22 3.3.1 Natural history of lower urinary tract infections ......................................... 22 3.3.2 Antibiotic prescribing strategies ................................................................ 23 3.3.3 Antibiotics compared with placebo ........................................................... 24 3.3.4 Choice of antibiotic ................................................................................... 25 3.3.5 Antibiotic dosing and course length .......................................................... 28 3.4 Antimicrobials in pregnant women ....................................................................... 29 3.4.1 Antibiotic prescribing strategies ................................................................ 29 3.4.2 Antibiotics compared with placebo or no treatment .................................. 29 3.4.3 Choice of antibiotics ................................................................................. 30 3.4.4 Antibiotic dosing and course length .......................................................... 31 Direct comparisons of different antibiotic course lengths ..................................... 32 3.5 Antimicrobials in older people .............................................................................. 33 3.5.1 Antibiotic prescribing strategies ................................................................ 33 Antibiotics compared with placebo or no treatment .................................. 33 3.5.2 33 3.5.3 Choice of antibiotic ................................................................................... 33 3.5.4 Antibiotic dosing and course length .......................................................... 33 3.6 Antimicrobials in men .......................................................................................... 34 3.7 Antimicrobials in children ..................................................................................... 35 3.7.1 Antibiotic prescribing strategies ................................................................ 35 4 DRAFT FOR CONSULTATION Contents 3.7.2 Antibiotics compared with placebo ........................................................... 35 3.7.3 Choice of antibiotic ................................................................................... 35 3.7.4 Antibiotic dosing and course length .......................................................... 35 4 Safety and tolerability ................................................................................................ 37 4.1 Non-pharmacological interventions ..................................................................... 37 4.1.1 Cranberry products .................................................................................. 37 4.1.2 Other non-pharmacological interventions ................................................. 37 4.2 Non-antimicrobial pharmacological interventions ................................................. 37 4.2.1 Oral analgesia .......................................................................................... 37 4.3 Antimicrobials ...................................................................................................... 38 4.3.1 Antibiotics in non-pregnant women .......................................................... 38 4.3.2 Antibiotics in pregnant women ................................................................. 40 4.3.3 Antibiotics in older people ........................................................................ 41 4.3.4 Antibiotics in children ............................................................................... 41 5 Antimicrobial resistance ............................................................................................ 42 6 Other considerations ................................................................................................. 43 6.1 Resource impact ................................................................................................. 43 6.1.1 Antibiotics ................................................................................................ 43 6.2 Medicines adherence .......................................................................................... 43 7 Terms used in the guideline ...................................................................................... 44 7.1.1 Apgar score ............................................................................................. 44 Appendices ........................................................................................................................ 45 Appendix A: Evidence sources .................................................................................. 45 Appendix B: Review protocol ..................................................................................... 49 Appendix C: Literature search strategy ..................................................................... 56 Appendix D: Study flow diagram ................................................................................ 68 Appendix E: Evidence prioritisation .......................................................................... 69 Appendix F: Included studies ..................................................................................... 71 Appendix G: Quality assessment of included studies .............................................. 73 G.1 Cranberry products ...................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No.: US 10,561,6759 B2 Griffith Et Al
    US010561675B2 United States Patent ( 10 ) Patent No.: US 10,561,6759 B2 Griffith et al. (45 ) Date of Patent : * Feb . 18 , 2020 (54 ) CYCLIC BORONIC ACID ESTER ( 58 ) Field of Classification Search DERIVATIVES AND THERAPEUTIC USES CPC A61K 31/69 ; A61K 31/396 ; A61K 31/40 ; THEREOF A61K 31/419677 (71 ) Applicant: Rempex Pharmaceuticals , Inc. , (Continued ) Lincolnshire , IL (US ) (56 ) References Cited (72 ) Inventors : David C. Griffith , San Marcos, CA (US ) ; Michael N. Dudley , San Diego , U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS CA (US ) ; Olga Rodny , Mill Valley , CA 4,194,047 A 3/1980 Christensen et al . ( US ) 4,260,543 A 4/1981 Miller ( 73 ) Assignee : REMPEX PHARMACEUTICALS , ( Continued ) INC . , Lincolnshire , IL (US ) FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS ( * ) Notice : Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this EP 1550657 A1 7/2005 patent is extended or adjusted under 35 JP 2003-229277 A 8/2003 U.S.C. 154 ( b ) by 1129 days. (Continued ) This patent is subject to a terminal dis claimer . OTHER PUBLICATIONS Abdel -Magid et al. , “ Reductive Amination ofAldehydes and Ketones ( 21) Appl. No .: 13 /843,579 with Sodium Triacetoxyborohydride: Studies on Direct and Indirect Reductive Amination Procedures ” , J Org Chem . ( 1996 )61 ( 11 ): 3849 ( 22 ) Filed : Mar. 15 , 2013 3862 . (65 ) Prior Publication Data (Continued ) US 2013/0331355 A1 Dec. 12 , 2013 Primary Examiner — Shengjun Wang Related U.S. Application Data (74 ) Attorney, Agent, or Firm — Wilmer Cutler Pickering (60 ) Provisional application No.61 / 656,452 , filed on Jun . Hale and Dorr LLP 6 , 2012 (57 ) ABSTRACT (51 ) Int. Ci. A61K 31/69 ( 2006.01) Method of treating or ameliorating a bacterial infection A61K 31/00 ( 2006.01 ) comprising administering a composition comprising a cyclic (Continued ) boronic acid ester compound in combination with a car ( 52 ) U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • AMR Surveillance in Pharma: a Case-Study for Data Sharingauthor by Professor Barry Cookson
    AMR Open Data Initiative AMR Surveillance in Pharma: a case-study for data sharingauthor by Professor Barry Cookson External Consultant to Project eLibrary • Division of Infection and Immunity, Univ. College London ESCMID• Dept. of Microbiology, © St Thomas’ Hospital Background of “90 day Project” Addressed some recommendations of the first Wellcome funded multi-disciplinary workshop (included Pharma Academia & Public Health invitees: 27thauthor July 2017 (post the Davos Declaration): by 1) Review the landscape of existing Pharma AMR programmes, their protocols,eLibrary data standards and sets 2) Develop a "portal" (register/platform) to access currently available AMR Surveillance data ESCMID Important ©to emphasise that this is a COLLABORATION between Pharma and others Overview of Questionnaire Content • General information - including name,author years active, countries, antimicrobials, microorganisms.by • Methodology - including accreditation, methodology for; surveillance, isolate collection, organism identification, breakpointseLibrary used, • Dataset - including data storage methodology, management and how accessed. ESCMID © 13 Company Responses author 7 by 3 3 eLibrary ESCMID © Structure of register Companies can have different ways of referring to their activities: We had to choose a consistent framework. author Companies Companyby 1 Programmes Programme A Programme B eLibrary Antimicrobials 1 2 3 4 5 company’s product comparator company’s product antimicrobials Programmes canESCMID contain multiple studies (e.g. Pfizer has© single
    [Show full text]
  • The Activity of Mecillinam Vs Enterobacteriaceae Resistant to 3Rd Generation Cephalosporins in Bristol, UK
    The activity of mecillinam vs Enterobacteriaceae resistant to 3rd generation cephalosporins in Bristol, UK Welsh Antimicrobial Study Group Grŵp Astudio Wrthfiotegau Cymru G Weston1, KE Bowker1, A Noel1, AP MacGowan1, M Wootton2, TR Walsh2, RA Howe2 (1) BCARE, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol BS10 5NB (2) Welsh Antimicrobial Study Group, NPHS Wales, University Hospital of Wales, CF14 4XW Introduction Results Results Results Figure 1: Population Distributions of Mecillinam MICs for E. Figure 2: Population Distributions of MICs for ESBL- Resistance in coliforms to 3rd generation 127 isolates were identified by screening of which 123 were confirmed as resistant to CTX or coli (n=72), NON-E. coli Enterobacteriaceae (n=47) and multi- producing E. coli (n=67) against mecillinam or mecillinam + cephalosporins (3GC) is an increasing problem resistant strains (n=39) clavulanate CAZ by BSAC criteria. The majority of 3GC- both in hospitals and the community. Oral options MR Non-E. coli E. coli Mecalone Mec+Clav resistant strains were E. coli 60.2%, followed by for the treatment of these organisms is often 35 50 Enterobacter spp. 16.2%, Klebsiella spp. 12.2%, limited due to resistance to multiple antimicrobial 45 and others (Citrobacter spp., Morganella spp., 30 classes. Mecillinam, an amidinopenicillin that is 40 Pantoea spp., Serratia spp.) 11.4%. 25 available in Europe as the oral pro-drug 35 All isolates were susceptible to meropenem with s 20 30 e s pivmecillinam, is stable to many beta-lactamases. t e a t l a mecillinam the next most active agent with more l o 25 o s We aimed to establish the activity of mecillinam i s i 15 % than 95% of isolates susceptible (table).
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Chloramphenicol on BB88 Murine Erythroleukemia Cells
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Dissertations Graduate College 8-2007 The Effect of Chloramphenicol on BB88 Murine Erythroleukemia Cells Peter K. W. Harris Western Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations Part of the Chemistry Commons Recommended Citation Harris, Peter K. W., "The Effect of Chloramphenicol on BB88 Murine Erythroleukemia Cells" (2007). Dissertations. 872. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/dissertations/872 This Dissertation-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE EFFECT OF CHLORAMPHENICOL ON BB88 MURINE ERYTHROLEUKEMIA CELLS by Peter K. W. Harris A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty o f The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Biological Sciences Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 2007 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. THE EFFECT OF CHLORAMPHENICOL ON BB88 MURINE ERYTHROLEUKEMIA CELLS Peter K. W. Harris, Ph.D. Western Michigan University, 2007 DNA microarrays can be used to measure genome-wide transcript levels. These measurements may be useful in understanding cellular changes induced by a chemical agent. In this study, Affymetrix microarray technology has been used to study the effects of chloramphenicol, an antibiotic that inhibits bacterial and mitochondrial protein synthesis, on the transcription profile in mammalian cells. Transcript levels in BB88 murine erythroleukemia cells treated with 50 micromolar (pM) chloramphenicol, a concentration shown to inhibit BB 88 proliferation, are measured.
    [Show full text]
  • Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2Nd Edition) Iii
    ii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice (2nd edition) iii Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice, 2nd edition Publisher: Companion Animal Group, Danish Veterinary Association, Peter Bangs Vej 30, 2000 Frederiksberg Authors of the guidelines: Lisbeth Rem Jessen (University of Copenhagen) Peter Damborg (University of Copenhagen) Anette Spohr (Evidensia Faxe Animal Hospital) Sandra Goericke-Pesch (University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover) Rebecca Langhorn (University of Copenhagen) Geoffrey Houser (University of Copenhagen) Jakob Willesen (University of Copenhagen) Mette Schjærff (University of Copenhagen) Thomas Eriksen (University of Copenhagen) Tina Møller Sørensen (University of Copenhagen) Vibeke Frøkjær Jensen (DTU-VET) Flemming Obling (Greve) Luca Guardabassi (University of Copenhagen) Reproduction of extracts from these guidelines is only permitted in accordance with the agreement between the Ministry of Education and Copy-Dan. Danish copyright law restricts all other use without written permission of the publisher. Exception is granted for short excerpts for review purposes. iv Foreword The first edition of the Antibiotic Use Guidelines for Companion Animal Practice was published in autumn of 2012. The aim of the guidelines was to prevent increased antibiotic resistance. A questionnaire circulated to Danish veterinarians in 2015 (Jessen et al., DVT 10, 2016) indicated that the guidelines were well received, and particularly that active users had followed the recommendations. Despite a positive reception and the results of this survey, the actual quantity of antibiotics used is probably a better indicator of the effect of the first guidelines. Chapter two of these updated guidelines therefore details the pattern of developments in antibiotic use, as reported in DANMAP 2016 (www.danmap.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Orally Active Esters of Cephalosporin Antibiotics. Ii
    VOL. XXXII NO. 11 THE JOURNAL OF ANTIBIOTICS 1155 ORALLY ACTIVE ESTERS OF CEPHALOSPORIN ANTIBIOTICS. II SYNTHESIS AND BIOLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF THE ACETOXYMETHYL ESTER OF CEFAMANDOLE WALTER E. WRIGHT, WILLIAM J. WHEELER, VERLE D. LINE, JUDITH ANN FROGGE' and DON R. FINLEY Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly and Company Indianapolis, Indiana 46206, U.S.A. (Received for publication August 29, 1979) The synthesis of the acetoxymethyl (AOM) ester of cefamandole (CM) is described. The sparingly soluble ester is shown to be well absorbed orally by mice, but only when administered in solution in a partially non-aqueous vehicle, 50°o propylene glycol. Neither the ester in aqueous suspension nor the sodium salt of CM in solution is well absorbed orally. The rate of oral absorption of the ester from solution is very rapid as shown by the early peak time and shape of the plasma level curve. Oral bioavailability from solution is at least 60% and is ap- parently limited only by hydrolysis or precipitation of a variable portion of the ester dose in the intestinal lumen prior to absorption. Esterification of the carboxyl group of penicillins and cephalosporins can result in significant improvement in the oral absorption of the parent drug. Pivampicillin1), bacampicillin2) and talampicil- lin3J are examples of such successful penicillin derivatives, and the acetoxymethyl ester of cephaloglycin4 and other cephalosporin derivatives') illustrate the applicability of this pro-drug principle to cephalo- sporins. Although the intact esters are biologically inactive, they can be hydrolyzed to the active parent drug either during passage through the intestinal wall or after absorption has occurred6).
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines on Urinary and Male Genital Tract Infections
    European Association of Urology GUIDELINES ON URINARY AND MALE GENITAL TRACT INFECTIONS K.G. Naber, B. Bergman, M.C. Bishop, T.E. Bjerklund Johansen, H. Botto, B. Lobel, F. Jimenez Cruz, F.P. Selvaggi TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1. INTRODUCTION 5 1.1 Classification 5 1.2 References 6 2. UNCOMPLICATED UTIS IN ADULTS 7 2.1 Summary 7 2.2 Background 8 2.3 Definition 8 2.4 Aetiological spectrum 9 2.5 Acute uncomplicated cystitis in pre-menopausal, non-pregnant women 9 2.5.1 Diagnosis 9 2.5.2 Treatment 10 2.5.3 Post-treatment follow-up 11 2.6 Acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis in pre-menopausal, non-pregnant women 11 2.6.1 Diagnosis 11 2.6.2 Treatment 12 2.6.3 Post-treatment follow-up 12 2.7 Recurrent (uncomplicated) UTIs in women 13 2.7.1 Background 13 2.7.2 Prophylactic antimicrobial regimens 13 2.7.3 Alternative prophylactic methods 14 2.8 UTIs in pregnancy 14 2.8.1 Epidemiology 14 2.8.2 Asymptomatic bacteriuria 15 2.8.3 Acute cystitis during pregnancy 15 2.8.4 Acute pyelonephritis during pregnancy 15 2.9 UTIs in post-menopausal women 15 2.10 Acute uncomplicated UTIs in young men 16 2.10.1 Pathogenesis and risk factors 16 2.10.2 Diagnosis 16 2.10.3 Treatment 16 2.11 References 16 3. UTIs IN CHILDREN 20 3.1 Summary 20 3.2 Background 20 3.3 Aetiology 20 3.4 Pathogenesis 20 3.5 Signs and symptoms 21 3.5.1 New-borns 21 3.5.2 Children < 6 months of age 21 3.5.3 Pre-school children (2-6 years of age) 21 3.5.4 School-children and adolescents 21 3.5.5 Severity of a UTI 21 3.5.6 Severe UTIs 21 3.5.7 Simple UTIs 21 3.5.8 Epididymo orchitis 22 3.6 Diagnosis 22 3.6.1 Physical examination 22 3.6.2 Laboratory tests 22 3.6.3 Imaging of the urinary tract 23 3.7 Schedule of investigation 24 3.8 Treatment 24 3.8.1 Severe UTIs 25 3.8.2 Simple UTIs 25 3.9 References 26 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Cr
    Drug Name Plate Number Well Location % Inhibition, Screen Axitinib 1 1 20 Gefitinib (ZD1839) 1 2 70 Sorafenib Tosylate 1 3 21 Crizotinib (PF-02341066) 1 4 55 Docetaxel 1 5 98 Anastrozole 1 6 25 Cladribine 1 7 23 Methotrexate 1 8 -187 Letrozole 1 9 65 Entecavir Hydrate 1 10 48 Roxadustat (FG-4592) 1 11 19 Imatinib Mesylate (STI571) 1 12 0 Sunitinib Malate 1 13 34 Vismodegib (GDC-0449) 1 14 64 Paclitaxel 1 15 89 Aprepitant 1 16 94 Decitabine 1 17 -79 Bendamustine HCl 1 18 19 Temozolomide 1 19 -111 Nepafenac 1 20 24 Nintedanib (BIBF 1120) 1 21 -43 Lapatinib (GW-572016) Ditosylate 1 22 88 Temsirolimus (CCI-779, NSC 683864) 1 23 96 Belinostat (PXD101) 1 24 46 Capecitabine 1 25 19 Bicalutamide 1 26 83 Dutasteride 1 27 68 Epirubicin HCl 1 28 -59 Tamoxifen 1 29 30 Rufinamide 1 30 96 Afatinib (BIBW2992) 1 31 -54 Lenalidomide (CC-5013) 1 32 19 Vorinostat (SAHA, MK0683) 1 33 38 Rucaparib (AG-014699,PF-01367338) phosphate1 34 14 Lenvatinib (E7080) 1 35 80 Fulvestrant 1 36 76 Melatonin 1 37 15 Etoposide 1 38 -69 Vincristine sulfate 1 39 61 Posaconazole 1 40 97 Bortezomib (PS-341) 1 41 71 Panobinostat (LBH589) 1 42 41 Entinostat (MS-275) 1 43 26 Cabozantinib (XL184, BMS-907351) 1 44 79 Valproic acid sodium salt (Sodium valproate) 1 45 7 Raltitrexed 1 46 39 Bisoprolol fumarate 1 47 -23 Raloxifene HCl 1 48 97 Agomelatine 1 49 35 Prasugrel 1 50 -24 Bosutinib (SKI-606) 1 51 85 Nilotinib (AMN-107) 1 52 99 Enzastaurin (LY317615) 1 53 -12 Everolimus (RAD001) 1 54 94 Regorafenib (BAY 73-4506) 1 55 24 Thalidomide 1 56 40 Tivozanib (AV-951) 1 57 86 Fludarabine
    [Show full text]
  • Dose Amoxicillin/Clavulanate
    1 Clinical trial of the treatment of acute sinusitis with standard-dose vs. high- dose amoxicillin/clavulanate Principal Investigator: Paul Sorum, MD, PhD, Professor of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Co-Investigators: Andrea Matho, MD, 2nd year Med-Ped resident (the four 2nd-year residents will be responsible for the timely follow-up of enrolled patients) Mary Mulqueen, MD, 2nd year Med-Ped resident Aaron Quidort, MD, 2nd year Med-Ped resident Miyuki Tanino, MD, 2nd year Med-Ped resident Sujata Kane, PA-C (who will be enrolling the most patients) Christine McGovern, MS, PA-C (who will work with the residents to assure the smooth enrollment and complete follow-up of patients) Joseph Wayne, MD, MPH, Associate Professor of Internal Medicine and Pediatrics Gina Garrison, Pharm D, Associate Professor of Pharmacy Practice, Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences (who will prepare the medications) Sub-Investigators The other attending physicians at the AMC Internal Medicine and Pediatrics office (who will be enrolling patients): Rahim Dhanani, MD Elizabeth Higgins, MD Hamish Kerr, MD Deborah Light, MD Jennifer Lindstrom, MD Tricia Pelnik-Fecko, MD Ivelisse Verrico, MD Kathleen Zabinski-Kramer, MD The other Medicine-Pediatrics residents (who will be enrolling patients and making follow-up telephone calls) Brady Bowen, DO Melanie Ecung Deyss, MD Laura El-Hage, MD Sara Khalil, MD Preetha Kurian, MD Daniel Lavelle, MD Manpreet Mann, MD Lyndsay Molinari, MD Uwa Otabor, MD Samuel Park, MD Britta Sundquist, MD Lisa Thaler, DO 2 Others Nursing staff (who will provide the patients with documents relating to the study) Medical students for research experience or work-study (who will help the residents to follow-up telephone calls and who will, if possible, enter data into the Excel data base) (to be set up) Statistical consultant: Michael Mulvihill, DPH, Einstein Medical Center, NYC A.
    [Show full text]
  • FLUOROQUINOLONES: from Structure to Activity and Toxicity
    FLUOROQUINOLONES: from structure to activity and toxicity F. Van Bambeke, Pharm. D. & P. M. Tulkens, MD, PhD Unité de Pharmacologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium SBIMC / BVIKM www.sbimc.org - www.bvikm.org www.md.ucl.ac.be/facm www.isap.org soon... Mechanism of action of fluoroquinolones: the basics... PORIN DNA Topo DNA gyrase isomerase Gram (-) Gram (+) 2 key enzymes in DNA replication: DNA gyrase topoisomerase IV bacterial DNA is supercoiled Ternary complex DNA - enzyme - fluoroquinolone DNA GYRASE catalytic subunits COVALENTLY CLOSED CIRCULAR DNA FLUOROQUINOLONES: DNA GYRASE ATP binding subunits 4 stacked molecules (Shen, in Quinolone Antimicrobial Agents, 1993) Resistance to fluoroquinolones: the basics decreased efflux pump permeability DNA mutation of DNA gyrase Topo isomerase the enzymes Gram (-) Gram (+) Fluoroquinolones are the first entirely man-made antibiotics: do we understand our molecule ? R5 O R COOH 6 R7 X8 N R1 Don’t panic, we will travel together…. Chemistry and Activity This is where all begins... The pharmacophore common to all fluoroquinolones BINDING TO DNA R5 O O R C 6 - BINDING TO O BINDING TO THE ENZYME THE ENZYME R7 X8 N R1 AUTO-ASSEMBLING DOMAIN (for stacking) From chloroquine to nalidixic acid... nalidixic acid N CH3 O O HN CH 3 C - O chloroquine CH N N Cl N 3 C2H5 1939 O O C O- 1962 Cl N 1958 C2H5 7-chloroquinoline (synthesis intermediate found to display antibacterial activity) Nalidixic acid * a • typical chemical features of O O fluoroquinolones (a, b, c) BUT a naphthridone C - O- b (N at position 8: ) H C N N 3 • limited usefulness as drug C H 2 5 • narrow antibacterial spectrum c (Enterobacteriaceae only) • short half-life (1.5h) • high protein binding (90%) * Belg.
    [Show full text]
  • Consideration of Antibacterial Medicines As Part Of
    Consideration of antibacterial medicines as part of the revisions to 2019 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for adults (EML) and Model List of Essential Medicines for children (EMLc) Section 6.2 Antibacterials including Access, Watch and Reserve Lists of antibiotics This summary has been prepared by the Health Technologies and Pharmaceuticals (HTP) programme at the WHO Regional Office for Europe. It is intended to communicate changes to the 2019 WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for adults (EML) and Model List of Essential Medicines for children (EMLc) to national counterparts involved in the evidence-based selection of medicines for inclusion in national essential medicines lists (NEMLs), lists of medicines for inclusion in reimbursement programs, and medicine formularies for use in primary, secondary and tertiary care. This document does not replace the full report of the WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines (see The selection and use of essential medicines: report of the WHO Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, 2019 (including the 21st WHO Model List of Essential Medicines and the 7th WHO Model List of Essential Medicines for Children). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019 (WHO Technical Report Series, No. 1021). Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330668/9789241210300-eng.pdf?ua=1) and Corrigenda (March 2020) – TRS1021 (https://www.who.int/medicines/publications/essentialmedicines/TRS1021_corrigenda_March2020. pdf?ua=1). Executive summary of the report: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/325773/WHO- MVP-EMP-IAU-2019.05-eng.pdf?ua=1.
    [Show full text]
  • Cyslabdan, a New Potentiator of Imipenem Activity Against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Produced by Streptomyces Sp
    J. Antibiot. 61(1): 7–10, 2008 THE JOURNAL OF ORIGINAL ARTICLE ANTIBIOTICS Cyslabdan, a New Potentiator of Imipenem Activity against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Produced by Streptomyces sp. K04-0144 II. Biological Activities Atsushi Fukumoto, Yong-Pil Kim, Hideaki Hanaki, Kazuro Shiomi, Hiroshi Tomoda, Satoshi O¯ mura Received: October 5, 2007 / Accepted: December 4, 2007 © Japan Antibiotics Research Association Abstract Cyslabdan produced by Streptomyces sp. K04- 0144 was found to potentiate imipenem activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The MIC value of imipenem against MRSA was reduced from 16 to 0.015 mg/ml in combination with cyslabdan. Study on anti-MRSA activity of other typical antibiotics in combination with cyslabdan showed that the potentiating activity was limited to b-lactam antibiotics. Furthermore, among b-lactam antibiotics, the activity of carbapenems Fig. 1 Structure of cyslabdan. was most remarkably poteintiated by cyslabdan. Keywords cyslabdan, imipenem potentiator, cyslabdan including potentiation of imipenem activity methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, against MRSA are described. Streptomyces sp. K04-0144, b-lactam Materials and Methods Introduction Materials During our screening for potentiators of imipenem activity The following materials were purchased from commercial against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus sources: Cloxacillin (ICN Biomedicals), ampicillin (Wako), (MRSA) from microbial metabolites, cyslabdan (Fig. 1) cefalexin (Wako), cefazolin (Wako), ciprofloxacin (Wako), was isolated from the culture broth of Streptomyces sp. vancomycin (Wako), tetracycline (Wako), biapenem (Meiji K04-0144. The compound has a labdane-type diterpene Seika), streptomycin (Meiji Seika), meropenem (Sumitomo skeleton connecting with an N-acetylcysteine via thioether Pharmaceuticals), panipenem (Sankyo), penicillin G linkage [1]. In this study, the biological activities of (Sigma), cefotaxime (Sigma), cefmetazole (Sigma), and S.
    [Show full text]