The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
6. The oppositional parties in the Parliament, 1957–1968 Parliamentary opposition to the Nicklin government came from a host of diverse players in the decade between August 1957 and January 1968. Especially after the Labor split of 1957, opponents of the Coalition government were a dispirited and dishevelled band, most of whom appeared as individualistic dissidents. Each had their own particular fights to fight and wars to wage. Each had different enemies in sight. Labor’s Jack Duggan and the QLP’s Ted Walsh never spoke to each other again privately after the split, despite afterwards sitting together in the Assembly for more than a decade, and frequently interjecting against each other. Adversarialism was not only a matter of formal battlelines drawn across the Chamber. Indeed, some of the most intense acrimony was found within the oppositional groups among remaining members who survived the 1957 split. If occasional internal conflicts simmered through the government side of politics, they at least demonstrated the capacity to remain in office while enjoying the comforts and trappings of power. The circumstance of being in government was sufficient to instil a collective solidarity between the Coalition parties, which was evident most strongly in the ministry. In contrast, the oppositional members were far more fragmented and querulous. They demonstrated little prospect of ever forming a single cohesive opposition. Indeed, after only one term in government, the Liberals were describing Labor as the weakest opposition in Queensland’s political history. Only towards the mid-1960s did the Labor opposition gradually develop any coherence and commitment of purpose. -
Hansard 9 April 2002
9 Apr 2002 Legislative Assembly 639 TUESDAY, 9 APRIL 2002 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. R. K. Hollis, Redcliffe) read prayers and took the chair at 9.30 a.m. PRIVILEGE Berri Ltd Mr SEENEY (Callide—NPA) (9.31 a.m.): On Monday, 11 March a number of media outlets carried reports claiming that I had lied to this parliament when I asked a question of the Minister for State Development on 8 March. This is a very serious accusation and it has been repeated a number of times by both the Premier and the Deputy Premier. The claim is demonstrably wrong. I did not lie to this parliament, nor did I mislead this parliament on 8 March or at any other time. The question that I asked referred to concerns that had been raised with me by a constituent relating to state government grants. Mr Speaker, I wish to table some documents pertaining to that issue. I table a copy of a telephone log from 8 August last year from my electorate office and a copy of my diary from 9 August last year, both of which record the initial contact that I had on this issue with my constituent. One is in my secretary's handwriting and one is in mine. Mr Speaker, I also table a document supplied by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission which is a current and historical search on Berri New South Wales Ltd, the corporate entity which received the grant. Under sections 168 to 171 of the Corporations Act, Berri Ltd has a statutory responsibility to ensure that this public record is correct. -
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
9. The slide towards uncertainty, 1969–1972 The Parliament resumed after a break of seven and a half months—a relatively long intermission but by no means unusual in those days. When an election was due in the new year (from March to June), it was common practice for the Parliament to adjourn in late November or early December (before Christmas) and to not reconvene for another six to eight months. This was the pattern followed throughout the 1940s to the mid-1950s and again from 1962 to 1972. The thirty-ninth Parliament would run from 5 August 1969 to 10 December 1971 (202 sitting days in the three-year term or 67 days a year) and not meet again before the May 1972 election. It was the last Parliament to meet with 78 members and, for the first time since winning government, the Coalition governed with a reduced majority. Under Nicklin, the Coalition’s majority had risen from nine in 1957 to 10 in 1960, to 14 in 1963 and 16 in 1966, but fell back to just 12 after the 1969 election—Bjelke-Petersen’s first electoral test as leader. With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear the 1969–72 Parliament was to become Labor’s high-water mark in its period in opposition, when for a few years it posed a credible challenge to the government. It was also a period when the Premier was at his most vulnerable politically—a condition deeply troubling to his own party colleagues, who would eventually be incited to rebel against his leadership. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1985
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER 1985 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Privilege 26 November 1985 2701 TUESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER 1985 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. H. Wamer, Toowoomba South) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. PRIVILEGE Criticism of Mr Speaker; Referral to Select Committee of Privileges Mr WARBURTON (Sandgate—Leader of the Opposition) (11.1 a.m.): I rise on a matter of privilege. In doing so, I refer you, Mr Speaker, to Standing Order No. 46, which states— "An urgent Motion, directly conceming the privileges of the House, shall take precedence of other Motions as well as of Orders of the Day." Because of the public criticism of the Speaker of the Parliament by a member of the Govemment as a result of last Thursday's events in this House, it seems to me that a question of privilege arises. For a Govemment member to say publicly that the Speaker is unable to manage the job, and for that member to be publicly critical of the Speaker's performance is a matter of grave concem. As a result of those comments, the Speaker has been quoted as saying that he was aware that two Ministers were mnning round the House lobbying to have him replaced. Mr Speaker, the public attack on your position, together with your response, which implies that certain National Party Ministers are undermining your position, necessitates discussion and relevant responsible action by members in this place. I hope that it is not necessary to remind the Premier and Treasurer and aU other members that the Speaker holds the position because of the Parliament and not because of the National Party Govemment. -
Legislative Assembly Hansard 1989
Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly WEDNESDAY, 5 JULY 1989 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Incorporation of Material in Hansard; Reading of Speeches 5 July 1989 5429 WEDNESDAY, 5 JULY 1989 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. L. W. Powell, Isis) read prayers and took the chair at 2.30 p.m. ASSENT TO BILLS Assent to the following Bills reported by Mr Speaker— The Honourable Angelo Vasta (Validation of Office) Bill; Queensland Interaational Tourist Centre Agreement Act Repeal Bill; Education (General Provisions) Act Amendment Bill; Appropriation BiU 1989-1990 (No. 1). INCORPORATION OF MATERIAL IN HANSARD; READING OF SPEECHES Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, on 10 November 1988 I made a statement to you with regard to the suitability of material being incorporated in Hansard. I think it is proper that we should remind ourselves that Hansard should be regarded as a record of what is actually spoken in the House and thus any proposal to incorporate unread matter into the record should be treated with the utmost of caution. The material should not be incorporated in Hansard unless— (a) it closely relates to the speech, or (b) illustrates, complements or elucidates that speech. Material that is publicly and readily available elsewhere, for example, newspaper articles. Government papers which have already been tabled in the House, law reports or extracts therefrom, the Fitzgerald inquiry report, and the judges commission reports, should not be incorporated in Hansard. Speeches or extracts from those particular documents should be referred to by page number and paragraph. Speeches or extracts previously made in the House or material previously incorporated should not be sought to be reincorporated in Hansard. -
Walter Campbell a Distinguished Life Barlow, Geoffrey; Corkery, James
Bond University Research Repository Walter Campbell A distinguished life Barlow, Geoffrey; Corkery, James Published in: Owen Dixon Society eJournal Licence: Unspecified Link to output in Bond University research repository. Recommended citation(APA): Barlow, G., & Corkery, J. (2013). Walter Campbell: A distinguished life. Owen Dixon Society eJournal, 1-32. https://ap01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/61BOND_INST/1281277900002381 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. For more information, or if you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact the Bond University research repository coordinator. Download date: 25 Sep 2021 WALTER CAMPBELL: A DISTINGUISHED LIFE BY GEOFF BARLOW AND JF CORKERY This is the third of three articles1 on the life and work of Sir Walter Campbell, Queensland jurist and Governor. This article examines Walter Campbell’s family background, his education, marriage, air force days, his experiences as Governor and his wide-ranging interests. It concludes with an assessment of the impact of his multi- faceted life. Sir Walter Campbell is well remembered for his term as the Governor of Queensland, particularly for his deft and effective handling of the state’s 1987 constitutional crisis, when Premier Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen refused to resign after losing the support of his party. Campbell’s career, however, intersected with a range of historical events, including political, legal, constitutional, diplomatic and even military incidents of significance to the nation. -
The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
14 . The demise of the Coalition and the Nationals governing alone, 1981–1983 In 1980, backroom plans had been already entertained for a stand-alone National Party government supplemented by a few Liberal ‘ministerialists’— opportunists who would cross over and side with whatever the next ministry turned out to be in order to remain part of the next government. Historically, ‘ministerialists’ were typically senior parliamentarians who, forgoing party loyalties, decided to collaborate as individuals in the formulation of a new government. After the 1980 election, however, any such musing was put on hold as the two conservative parties lapsed back into coalition. This time, the Nationals clearly imposed their dominance, taking the prime portfolios and consigning the ‘leftovers’ to the Liberals. Labor began to refer to the junior partners as ‘Dr Edwards and his shattered Liberal team’—the losers who were ‘now completely the captive of the National Party’ (QPD 1981:vol. 283, p. 7). Despite his vitriolic attacks against the Premier and the National-led government, Llew Edwards retained his position as Deputy Premier and Treasurer—positions he would keep until he was deposed by Terry White on the eve of the Coalition collapse in August 1983, although there was an unsuccessful attempt by dissident Liberals to remove Edwards in November 1981. When the Premier learned about the dissident Liberal plan to topple Edwards, with Angus Innes taking the lead, he declared Innes an ‘anti-coalitionist’ and someone with whom he would not work. Instead, Bjelke-Petersen began hatching plans to form a minority government with whomsoever among the Liberals who would give him support; and then to govern alone until mid-1982. -
Essay: Long Gone, but Not Forgotten
Long gone, but not forgotten Author Finnane, Mark Published 2008 Journal Title Griffith Review Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2008. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owner for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23817 Link to published version https://griffithreview.com/articles/long-gone-but-not-forgotten/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Essay: Long gone, but not forgotten Author: Mark Finnane n 1989 I was party to a writ sought by a number of historians to prevent the destruction of Special Branch records. The writ was provoked by the decision of Ithe Queensland police, with the agreed and required authority of the State Archivist, to destroy the files that had been maintained by the state’s Police Special Branch. The writ faded away in circumstances that are lost to me. But the incident holds a retrospective fascination. It points to the strangely ambivalent status of the Special Branch in the history of the 1950s to the 1980s, during which the threats of a political police in Australia were more imagined than realised. As historians, we thought it important that this controversial part of the state’s history should be preserved. Over the years, some of us had found the records of earlier intelligence agencies and political policing invaluable – to illuminate the conflicted histories of Australia in wartime, for example. -
GAMUT 1977 47 2.Pdf
•*.' V7 Paranoia & Reds under the Bed Dear People, 1 read with much sadness the some people who are members QiMtnttntO't MtAti-Ctnvut Wt*t*r Nempwtt articles in your/ excellent first of the "organised left" happen Wla|*tf>«^.- •J1*'AMN»r III* J'* fMl edition on AUS (pages 8 and 9). to be involved in anti-uranium Both Mr Herzog and Mr mining groups, it makes the anti- Campbell fall uito the diatribe uranium mining issue an "ex of language which only alienates tremist campaign." people. Mr Campbell made some unwarranted assumptions about ANS is the only widely the attitudes of his audience- chculating news service available for example: a pro-homosexual to campus based newspapers, INFORMS NEEDED, BUT ity bias, and assumed that stu research groups and mterested dents automatically will take a people that presents a different pro-Timor, pro-Thai students, view of issues and events. LAWS GET HARSHER pro-anti uranium mining line. Mr Herzog has cleariy shown This is a mistake common in the how he supports established Why does the law in Queensland remain 100 years behind the rest of Australia? progressive clement in AUS-we media by writing often for the Gamut never ceases to be amazed at the basic lack of citizens' rights here, the so- assume a view of people and the Australian. A narrow view of called "police state." world, and then feel that it is so events and issues as seen from This week Gamut looks at three areas where people have been disadvantaged and obvious that it is assumed of all the establishment point of view. -
Hansard 16 July 1991
Legislative Assembly 1 16 July 1991 NOTE: There could be differences between this document and the official printed Hansard, Vol. 319 TUESDAY, 16 JULY 1991 OPENING OF PARLIAMENT Pursuant to the Proclamation by His Excellency the Governor, dated 4 July 1991, appointing Parliament to meet this day for the dispatch of business, the House met at 10 a.m. in the Legislative Assembly Chamber. Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. Fouras, Ashgrove) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. The Clerk read the Proclamation. COMMISSION TO OPEN PARLIAMENT Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have to inform the House that I have received from His Excellency the Administrator of the Government a Commission appointing me and Mr C. B. Campbell, Chairman of Committees, or either of us, Commissioners to open this session of Parliament. I now call on the Clerk to read the Commission. Mr SPEAKER, as Senior Commissioner, said: Honourable members, we have it in command from His Excellency the Administrator of the Government to communicate to you that Parliament has been summoned to meet this day to consider legislation, the granting of Supply to Her Majesty and such other matters as may be brought before you; that the customary Speech will not be delivered at the Opening of this the Second Session of the Forty-sixth Parliament of Queensland and that, nevertheless, it is His Excellency's desire that you proceed forthwith to the consideration of the aforementioned business. CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION Report of Investigation into Complaints of Mr J. G. Soorley against Brisbane City Council Mr SPEAKER: Honourable members, I have to report that on Thursday, 6 June I received from the Criminal Justice Commission the report of the investigation into complaints of James Gerard Soorley against the Brisbane City Council. -
The Ayes Have It: the History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989
17 . Conclusion: do the ‘ayes’ have it? The Queensland Parliament is an inherently political and adversarial institution— vibrant in some areas, moribund in others. Under the Constitution, it is principally its own ‘boss’ and has all the strengths and weaknesses that concept implies. If perhaps not Australia’s most reformist parliamentary institution, it nevertheless is not a static institution in any way. It changes over time as circumstances change; it is refreshed with new personnel and procedures; it can be analytical or banal; it can display prudence or excess; it can be characterised by goodwill or enmity; it can be a workhorse or it can be symbolic. In many ways, parliament is a mirror of society, reflecting its values, visions and apprehensions. It consists of elected members who represent specific constituencies at the local level and who share the concerns and biases of those communities. Parliament can also react to itself and become self-referential, and it will take heed of coverage of itself and its activities by the media and react to changing attitudes and the expectations of the wider community. Parliament is an important part of the political system, but it is only one part of that system. Although it considers itself supreme, it has rivals and combatants and other institutions vying for attention. The other components of the political system include the executive, which sits in and dominates the Parliament but is separate from it. So too are the media, the courts, other levels of government, the array of interest groups and social movements, other forums and tribunals and the citizenry. -
5309T1510.Pdf
How different would unlikely choice. He was not a good public speaker short. The coalition was re-elected in 1969 only Queensland have been if Jack and, even as a youngish backbencher, he was a because voters did not want a dull and limited Pizzey, who had a university degree problem for the party whips. His first cabinet Labor Party led by a dull and limited Jack Houston, and the experience of life gained portfolio was Works. It was ideal, because bridges, about whom the most exciting thing to be said was by serving as a World War II roads, schools, police stations - all the great items of that he judged dog shows. Queenslanders had not artillery officer, had not died in state government spending - could be dispensed to warmed, either, to Bjelke-Petersen, a curious man August 1968? For with his electorates. And Bjelke-Petersen never forgot the with a convoluted speaking style, a difficult name death, Johannes Bjellce- backbenchers concerned owed him a favour. and the reputation of being - not to put too fine a Petersen became premier. In 1968, those favours were called in. point on it - a wowser and a Bible basher. Bjelke-Petersen seemed an Bjelke-Petersen's premiership was nearly very Late in October 1970, Bjelke-Petersen was in 1920 copper fields; threaten >> 1922 state-wide industrial government for three Disquiet over Labor viability of industry. Death of George Silas turmoil (to 1929). Depression years; policies including bids > Australian Workers Curtis, left, > Qld conservatives Country National to abolish upper house; Union gains 44-hour Rockhampton's martyr merge as Country and Party leader Arthur Labor returned with week in Qld; to separation Progressive National Moore is premier.