DOCSLIB.ORG

Legislative Assembly Hansard 1985

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER 1985 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Privilege 26 November 1985 2701 TUESDAY, 26 NOVEMBER 1985 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. J. H. Wamer, Toowoomba South) read prayers and took the chair at 11 a.m. PRIVILEGE Criticism of Mr Speaker; Referral to Select Committee of Privileges Mr WARBURTON (Sandgate—Leader of the Opposition) (11.1 a.m.): I rise on a matter of privilege. In doing so, I refer you, Mr Speaker, to Standing Order No. 46, which states— "An urgent Motion, directly conceming the privileges of the House, shall take precedence of other Motions as well as of Orders of the Day." Because of the public criticism of the Speaker of the Parliament by a member of the Govemment as a result of last Thursday's events in this House, it seems to me that a question of privilege arises. For a Govemment member to say publicly that the Speaker is unable to manage the job, and for that member to be publicly critical of the Speaker's performance is a matter of grave concem. As a result of those comments, the Speaker has been quoted as saying that he was aware that two Ministers were mnning round the House lobbying to have him replaced. Mr Speaker, the public attack on your position, together with your response, which implies that certain National Party Ministers are undermining your position, necessitates discussion and relevant responsible action by members in this place. I hope that it is not necessary to remind the Premier and Treasurer and aU other members that the Speaker holds the position because of the Parliament and not because of the National Party Govemment. It is unheard of that a leader of the Queensland Govemment should pubUcly criticise the performance of the Speaker, just as it is unheard of that a Speaker should publicly accuse Ministers of undermining his authority. Referring to the matter of privilege—the public comment of recent days has undoubtedly concemed the public and many members of ParUament, and it would be wrong if a blind eye were tumed to what has occurred. For my part, the public comment that has been made is damaging and destabilising. I therefore move— "That the public criticism of the Speaker's performance by the Premier, together with the Speaker's allegations that certain Ministers were undermining his position, be referred to the Select Committee of Privileges for consideration and report." Question—That the motion (Mr Warburton) be agreed to—put; and the House divided— 2702 26 November 1985 Petitions AYES, 30 NOES, 50 Braddy Wamer, A. M. Ahem Lane Bums Yewdale Alison Lee Campbell Austin Lester Casey Bailey Lickiss Comben Bjelke-Petersen Lingard D'Arcy Booth Littleproud De Lacy Borbidge McKechnie Eaton Cahill McPhie Fouras Chapman Menzel Gibbs, R. J. Clauson Miller Goss Cooper Muntz Hamill Elliott Newton Kruger FitzGerald Powell Mackenroth Gibbs, I. J. Randell McElligott Glasson Row McLean Gunn Simpson Milliner Gygar Stephan Palaszczuk Harper Stoneman Price Hartwig Tenni Scott Harvey Tumer Shaw Henderson Wharton Smith Hinze White Underwood Innes Vaughan Tellers: Jennings Tellers: Veivers Davis Katter Kaus Warburton Prest Knox Neal Resolved in the negative. CIRCULATION AND COST OF HANSARD Mr SPEAKER announced the receipt from the Chief Reporter, Pariiamentary Reporting Staff, of his report on the circulation and cost of Hansard for the session of 1984-85. PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Coronary Care Unit, Cairns Base Hospital From Mr De Lacy (303 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland wiU take action to overcome shortage of staff at the Coronary Care Unit at the Caims Base Hospital. Judges' Pensions Acts From Mr Bums (28 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will amend section 17 of Judges Pensions Acts 1957-1967. Griffith University Course in Family Relationships From Mr Wharton (24 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will establish an inquiry into the Griffith University course in family relationships. [Similar petitions were received from Mr Casey (22 signatories), Mr I. J. Gibbs (19 signatories), Mr De Lacy (18 signatories), Mr Burns (30 signatories), Mr Tenni (34 signatories), Mr Stephan (14 signatories), Mr Cooper (23 signatories) and Mr Neal (4 signatories).] Third-party Insurance Premiums From Mr Warburton (488 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will revoke recent increases in third-party insurance and ensure future increases are determined after public hearing. Petitions received. Ministerial Statements 26 November 1985 2703 PAPERS The following papers were laid on the table, and ordered to be printed— Reports— Queensland Radium Institute for the year ended 30 June 1985 Department of Aboriginal and Islanders Advancement for the year ended 30 June 1985 Department of Harbours and Marine for the year ended 30 June 1985 Mackay Harbour Board for the year ended 30 June 1985 Townsville Harbour Board for the year ended 30 June 1985 Registrar of Co-operative and Other Societies for the year ended 30 June 1985 Registrar of Co-operative Housing Societies for the year ended 30 June 1985. The following papers were laid on the table— Proclamation under the Liquor Act and Other Acts Amendment Act 1985 Orders in Council under— Land Act 1962-1985 Harbours Act 1955-1982 and the Statutory Bodies Financial Arrangements Act 1982-1984 Canals Act 1958-1984 Liquor Act 1912-1985 Regulations under— Land Act 1962-1985 River Improvement Tmst Act 1940-1983 Irrigation Act 1922-1983 Auctioneers and Agents Act 1971-1985. MINISTERIAL STATEMENTS Greyhound Racing Control Board; Mr M. Mason Hon. R. J. HINZE (South Coast—Minister for Local Govemment, Main Roads and Racing) (11.15 a.m.), by leave: In recent days, statements have been made both in and outside the House that the greyhound industry is in turmoil because of the alleged actions or inactions of the Greyhound Racing Control Board of Queensland and, more specifically, the board secretary, Mr Max Mason. As is entirely proper in these matters, I referred those allegations to the board for a report. A number of documents have been fumished to me by the board, which has exhaustively and comprehensively investigated not only the allegations but also the backgrounds of some of the principal players in this orchestrated attack on the board's good name, reputation and integrity. I make the general observation that all too often there is a tendency to accept at face value allegations from people who are plausible enough to masquerade as either impartial witnesses to events, experts on those events, or both. Although it is often convenient, for political reasons, not to look too carefully at those making sensational accusations, it hardly reflects any credit on the media which finds it easier to accept sensation than question the pedlars of that sensation about their motives. I have reviewed the documents from the board and I am satisfied by the replies that the board has provided. 2704 26 November 1985 Ministerial Statements One of the more outrageous aUegations brought against Mr Mason was that of sexual harassment of some of the board's female employees. The documents provided to me by the board include statements by former female secretaries, which, in themselves, provide fascinating reading. For example, one former employee reports how she was tracked down in Melboume by one of the chief players in this campaign, Dr John Murray, and asked to provide a statutory declaration aUeging improper conduct against Mr Mason. That former employee refused and, in fact, has provided a letter cleariy stating the exact reverse. That letter, I believe, is powerful evidence against Dr Murray and gives a clear indication of the depths to which this campaign against Mr Mason and the board is prepared to sink. The documents show that there has been a deliberate and concerted attempt by a determined minority that is hell-bent on getting its own way to serve its own ends, whatever the broader consequences. I, as Minister for Racing, have full confidence in the abiUty of the board to discharge its functions, as far as both the Govemment and the industry are concemed. I seek leave to table documents and, in doing so, I draw to the attention of honourable members some of those documents. I refer to— (a) the report of the Greyhound Racing Control Board of Queensland, signed by every member thereof, into statements made in and outside this House; (b) a statement and statutory declarations by former and present female secretaries employed by the board whilst Mr Mason was secretary, clearly refuting the allegations of sexual harassment on Mr Mason's part; (c) the board's 1985 annual report incorporating an audit certificate signed by the Auditor-General of Queensland himself certifying to the correctness of the board's accounts and expenditure; (d) an analysis of computerised box draws conducted between 2 April 1985 and 13 November 1985; (e) full board reports on the aUeged ring-ins which show the honourable member for Wolston's allegations in this respect to be incorrect; (f) quotation and other documents from the company Wang Computer Pty Ltd, together with a report from Innes Blinco and Associates conceming the board's computer and the computerised box draws; (g) a summary of fines imposed of $500 or more for 1983-84 (12), 1984-85 (16) and 1985-86 to date (6); (h) the board's findings that the box draws for the heats and finals of the 1984 and 1985 Mount Isa Cups were carried out in accordance with properly established board procedures; and (i) the board's report that Mr Mason has been employed for an unintermpted term by six successive greyhound boards.
Recommended publications
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    9. The slide towards uncertainty, 1969–1972 The Parliament resumed after a break of seven and a half months—a relatively long intermission but by no means unusual in those days. When an election was due in the new year (from March to June), it was common practice for the Parliament to adjourn in late November or early December (before Christmas) and to not reconvene for another six to eight months. This was the pattern followed throughout the 1940s to the mid-1950s and again from 1962 to 1972. The thirty-ninth Parliament would run from 5 August 1969 to 10 December 1971 (202 sitting days in the three-year term or 67 days a year) and not meet again before the May 1972 election. It was the last Parliament to meet with 78 members and, for the first time since winning government, the Coalition governed with a reduced majority. Under Nicklin, the Coalition’s majority had risen from nine in 1957 to 10 in 1960, to 14 in 1963 and 16 in 1966, but fell back to just 12 after the 1969 election—Bjelke-Petersen’s first electoral test as leader. With the benefit of hindsight, it is clear the 1969–72 Parliament was to become Labor’s high-water mark in its period in opposition, when for a few years it posed a credible challenge to the government. It was also a period when the Premier was at his most vulnerable politically—a condition deeply troubling to his own party colleagues, who would eventually be incited to rebel against his leadership.
  • Walter Campbell a Distinguished Life Barlow, Geoffrey; Corkery, James

    Walter Campbell a Distinguished Life Barlow, Geoffrey; Corkery, James

    Bond University Research Repository Walter Campbell A distinguished life Barlow, Geoffrey; Corkery, James Published in: Owen Dixon Society eJournal Licence: Unspecified Link to output in Bond University research repository. Recommended citation(APA): Barlow, G., & Corkery, J. (2013). Walter Campbell: A distinguished life. Owen Dixon Society eJournal, 1-32. https://ap01.alma.exlibrisgroup.com/view/delivery/61BOND_INST/1281277900002381 General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. For more information, or if you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact the Bond University research repository coordinator. Download date: 25 Sep 2021 WALTER CAMPBELL: A DISTINGUISHED LIFE BY GEOFF BARLOW AND JF CORKERY This is the third of three articles1 on the life and work of Sir Walter Campbell, Queensland jurist and Governor. This article examines Walter Campbell’s family background, his education, marriage, air force days, his experiences as Governor and his wide-ranging interests. It concludes with an assessment of the impact of his multi- faceted life. Sir Walter Campbell is well remembered for his term as the Governor of Queensland, particularly for his deft and effective handling of the state’s 1987 constitutional crisis, when Premier Sir Joh Bjelke-Petersen refused to resign after losing the support of his party. Campbell’s career, however, intersected with a range of historical events, including political, legal, constitutional, diplomatic and even military incidents of significance to the nation.
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    14 . The demise of the Coalition and the Nationals governing alone, 1981–1983 In 1980, backroom plans had been already entertained for a stand-alone National Party government supplemented by a few Liberal ‘ministerialists’— opportunists who would cross over and side with whatever the next ministry turned out to be in order to remain part of the next government. Historically, ‘ministerialists’ were typically senior parliamentarians who, forgoing party loyalties, decided to collaborate as individuals in the formulation of a new government. After the 1980 election, however, any such musing was put on hold as the two conservative parties lapsed back into coalition. This time, the Nationals clearly imposed their dominance, taking the prime portfolios and consigning the ‘leftovers’ to the Liberals. Labor began to refer to the junior partners as ‘Dr Edwards and his shattered Liberal team’—the losers who were ‘now completely the captive of the National Party’ (QPD 1981:vol. 283, p. 7). Despite his vitriolic attacks against the Premier and the National-led government, Llew Edwards retained his position as Deputy Premier and Treasurer—positions he would keep until he was deposed by Terry White on the eve of the Coalition collapse in August 1983, although there was an unsuccessful attempt by dissident Liberals to remove Edwards in November 1981. When the Premier learned about the dissident Liberal plan to topple Edwards, with Angus Innes taking the lead, he declared Innes an ‘anti-coalitionist’ and someone with whom he would not work. Instead, Bjelke-Petersen began hatching plans to form a minority government with whomsoever among the Liberals who would give him support; and then to govern alone until mid-1982.
  • Measuring the Benefits of Active Travel

    Measuring the Benefits of Active Travel

    Measuring the Benefits of Active Travel Prepared for Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads Measuring the Benefits of Active Travel Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................ iv 1 Introduction .................................................................................... 1 1.1 Objectives ......................................................................................... 1 1.2 Background ....................................................................................... 2 2 Methodology ................................................................................... 5 2.1 Cost-benefit analysis ......................................................................... 5 2.2 Site selection ..................................................................................... 5 2.3 Data collection ................................................................................... 7 3 Survey results: Site comparisons ............................................... 10 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................... 10 3.2 Trip statistics ................................................................................... 11 3.3 Alternative transport modes ............................................................ 15 3.4 Physical activity ............................................................................... 17 3.5 Comfort ..........................................................................................
  • The Nicklin Government's Legislative Program

    The Nicklin Government's Legislative Program

    5. The Nicklin government’s legislative program Frank Nicklin led a conservative government that believed steadfastly in the power of the state and the responsibility of governments to govern. His governments undertook a relatively activist legislative program, which was maintained over four succeeding parliaments throughout the decade of his premiership, 1957–68. The government’s legislative appetite generally increased with its tenure in office, reflecting perhaps increasing confidence in incumbency or the tendency for modern governments to resort to legislative solutions. Increased legislation was also part of modern society—in particular, the policy areas under the justice portfolio had large increases in legislation as more areas came under regulation and scrutiny. During its first term (1957–60), the government averaged 44 pieces of legislation per annum, then managed 54 per annum in the second term (1960–63), rising to 62 acts per annum during the thirty-seventh Parliament (1963–66). Even in his final year as Premier, Nicklin was responsible for steering 53 legislative measures through the Assembly. In total, the Nicklin government passed 591 pieces of legislation. Of this total, the number of new acts was 192 (or about 17 per parliamentary session), with 394 pieces of amending legislation (approximately 100 per parliament or 36 per session). Over the Nicklin decade, five repeal bills were passed (see Table 5.1). As Table 5.2 indicates, the government’s main legislative activity, judged according to the number of measures, was predominantly directed towards two areas: justice issues or measures under the Attorney-General’s portfolio (107 acts) and Treasury and financial measures (103 acts).
  • Essay: Long Gone, but Not Forgotten

    Essay: Long Gone, but Not Forgotten

    Long gone, but not forgotten Author Finnane, Mark Published 2008 Journal Title Griffith Review Copyright Statement © The Author(s) 2008. This is the author-manuscript version of this paper. It is posted here with permission of the copyright owner for your personal use only. No further distribution permitted. For information about this journal please refer to the journal’s website or contact the author. Downloaded from http://hdl.handle.net/10072/23817 Link to published version https://griffithreview.com/articles/long-gone-but-not-forgotten/ Griffith Research Online https://research-repository.griffith.edu.au Essay: Long gone, but not forgotten Author: Mark Finnane n 1989 I was party to a writ sought by a number of historians to prevent the destruction of Special Branch records. The writ was provoked by the decision of Ithe Queensland police, with the agreed and required authority of the State Archivist, to destroy the files that had been maintained by the state’s Police Special Branch. The writ faded away in circumstances that are lost to me. But the incident holds a retrospective fascination. It points to the strangely ambivalent status of the Special Branch in the history of the 1950s to the 1980s, during which the threats of a political police in Australia were more imagined than realised. As historians, we thought it important that this controversial part of the state’s history should be preserved. Over the years, some of us had found the records of earlier intelligence agencies and political policing invaluable – to illuminate the conflicted histories of Australia in wartime, for example.
  • Surface Water Quality

    Surface Water Quality

    Airport Link Phase 2 – Detailed Feasibility Study CHAPTER 8 SURFACE WATER QUALITY October 2006 Contents 8. Surface Water Quality 8-1 8.1 Description of Existing Environment 8-1 8.1.1 Description of Waterways 8-1 8.1.2 Environmental Values and Water Quality Objectives 8-3 8.1.3 Water Quality Monitoring Programs 8-6 8.1.4 Water Quality Assessment 8-7 8.2 Potential Impacts and Mitigation Measures 8-11 8.2.1 Potential Impacts 8-11 8.2.2 Mitigation Measures 8-13 8.3 Conclusions 8-15 PAGE i 8. Surface Water Quality This Chapter addresses surface water aspects of Section 5.3 of the Terms of Reference; groundwater management were addressed separately in Chapter 6. A detailed technical paper on surface water quality is provided as Technical Paper No 4 – Surface Water Quality in Volume 3 of the EIS. Watercourses in and adjacent to the study corridor are described in the context of their catchment areas. The quality of water in these waterways is assessed from past or existing monitoring programs. Potential impacts on the Environmental Values of the waterways are assessed and Water Quality Objectives are defined in line with existing local, state and national guidelines. Mitigation measures and/or management strategies are defined for identified potential negative impacts. 8.1 Description of Existing Environment 8.1.1 Description of Waterways The waterways intersecting the study corridor that could be affected by the construction and/or operation of the project and their catchments are shown in Figure 8-1. These are: Enoggera Creek; and Kedron Brook.
  • Legislative Assembly Hansard 1988

    Legislative Assembly Hansard 1988

    Queensland Parliamentary Debates [Hansard] Legislative Assembly TUESDAY, 11 OCTOBER 1988 Electronic reproduction of original hardcopy Papers 11 October 1988 1027 TUESDAY, 11 OCTOBER 1988 Mr SPEAKER (Hon. L. W. PoweU, Isis) read prayers and took the chair at 10 a.m. ASSENT TO BILLS Assent to the following Bills reported by Mr Speaker— Surrogate Parenthood Bill; Status of Children Act Amendment Bill; Holidays Act Amendment Bill; Drainage of Mines Act Repeal Bill; Brisbane Forest Park Act Amendment Bill. PETITIONS The Clerk announced the receipt of the following petitions— Sealing of Gregory Developmental Road From Mr Lester (283 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will take action to ensure the complete sealing of the Gregory Developmental Road. Licensed Sporting Clubs From Mr Lester (67 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will review the restrictions on trading hours, fund-raising and other activities in licensed sporting clubs. Compulsory Wearing of Safety Helmets by Cyclists From Mr FitzGerald (5 signatories) praying that the Pariiament of Queensland will legislate for compulsory wearing of safety helmets by cyclists. Introduction of Poker Machines From Mr Wells (208 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will take action to introduce poker machines. Redevelopment of Expo Site From Mr Innes (1 580 signatories) praying that the Parliament of Queensland will reject the River City 2000 proposal and use the Expo site for parkland, the retention of historic buildings and public access to the river for the full length of the site. Petitions received. STATEMENT OF UNFORESEEN EXPENDITURE, 1987-88 Mr SPEAKER read a message from His ExceUency the Govemor transmitting the Statement of Unforeseen Expenditure to be Appropriated for the year 1987-88.
  • The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    The History of the Queensland Parliament, 1957–1989

    15 . The implosion of Joh Bjelke- Petersen, 1983–1987 The 1983 election ended the ‘constitutional crisis’ by providing the Nationals with exactly half the seats in the Parliament (41) and the opportunity to supplement their ministry with Liberal ministerialists who would agree to join the new government. The Premier had a number of options to secure his majority. Many of the surviving former Liberal ministers were not generally regarded as ‘anti-coalitionists’ in the previous government. The six potential ministerialists who might have been persuaded to change allegiances were: Norm Lee, Bill Lickiss, Brian Austin, Don Lane, Colin Miller and even Bill Knox. According to the Courier-Mail (15 July 1983), when two Coalition backbenchers, Bill Kaus and Bob Moore, had quit the Liberals and joined the Nationals in July, two Liberal ministers, Norm Lee and Bill Lickiss, already had indicated they would consider jumping ship. It was almost as if a race to defect was on. The two other Liberals to survive the 1983 poll, Terry White and Angus Innes, would not have been acceptable to the Premier and his senior ministers. In total, six of the eight Liberals had been ministers (although Miller had served for just 13 days after White was sacked and before the resignations of all the Liberals were accepted). Knox had been a minister since 1965 and Lee and Lickiss had been ministers since early 1975. They had some pedigree. Austin and Lane (and White) each had one parliamentary term as minister. Two Liberals, however, took the issue into their own hands. The day after the election, Austin and Lane had discussed the prospects of defecting and swapping parties, with Austin saying ‘I’m sick of this…I reckon we ought to give ’em the arse.
  • 1989 Cabinet Minutes: Highlights Report

    1989 Cabinet Minutes: Highlights Report

    1989 Cabinet Minutes: Highlights report Dr Jonathan Richards 1 November 2019 Fitzgerald Inquiry Report Bill Gunn, loyal deputy to all three National Party premiers, first announced the Fitzgerald Inquiry into ‘crime bosses’ and police corruption to demonstrate his leadership potential (‘After The Coup’, Sunday Mail, 24/9/1989; ‘Beware The Victory Salute’, Courier Mail, 25/9/1989; Wanna, p486 & 581). Initially expected to run for six weeks, the Inquiry eventually held sittings for more than 200 days, heard evidence from over 300 witnesses and cost $20m. The Inquiry’s extension, which revealed far more than the few illegal casinos, odd “bent copper” and secret brothels that Gunn probably anticipated, meant that numerous ‘Secret’ Decisions were necessary (Decisions 56195, 56287, 56289, 56342, 56394, 56492, 57019, 57021). Implementation of the Fitzgerald Report recommendations ‘lock, stock and barrel’ was approved by Cabinet on 3 July (Decision 57021; Wanna p609). Parliament was recalled on 5 July to discuss the Fitzgerald Inquiry report (Decision 56845). Ahern told the House: ‘Today in Queensland and throughout Australia every eye was on this Parliament to debate the Fitzgerald commission report’ (Queensland Parliamentary Debates, 5/7/1989, p5431). Two important pieces of legislation, recommended by Fitzgerald, eventually emerged from the Inquiry: the Electoral and Administrative Reform Commission (EARC) Bill and the Criminal Justice Commission (CJC) Bill (Decisions 57182, 57227, 57448, 57580; 57594). These institutions were different to anything ever seen in Queensland politics. A new Police Act was also drafted and approved (Decisions 56473, 57117, 57185, 57305, 57637). A number of politicians and other high-ranking officials were adversely named at the Fitzgerald Inquiry (Fitzgerald Report).
  • Political Chronicles 1985 (Qld)

    Political Chronicles 1985 (Qld)

    Political Chronicle 305 QUEENSLAND Stafford By-Election A by-election in the state seat of Stafford was necessitated by the death on 21 June 1984 of the ALP incumbent, Dr Denis Murphy. It will be recalled that Dr Murphy first won the seat at the October 1983 general election, doing so by the narrow margin of 39 votes over the National party's candidate, Mr Pat Blake. On that occasion the then Liberal member of nine-years standing, Mr Terry Gygar, ran third, his performance mirroring the poor electoral showing statewide of the Liberals at that poll. Interestingly too, it was the leakage of 15 per cent of Mr Gygar's preferences which secured Dr Murphy's election, rather than Mr Blake's, in 1983. The very considerable significance of the Stafford contest was reflected in the vigor of each party's campaign, and in the sustained media focus on the candidates and issues in the several weeks preceding the 4 August polling date. Labor had the most to lose in Stafford. The party had, after all, only won Stafford ten months beforehand, and although its hold on the seat was only a tenuous one in terms of the October 1983 result, the ALP could expect to benefit from any anti-government swing in the metropolitan area. A failure by Labor to hold one of its own city seats in a by-election situation would be particularly damaging to the party's stocks in terms of maintaining political momentum in the lead-up to the 1986 state poll. In those terms it was not surprising that the ALP selected as its candidate Mrs Janine Walker, a prominent ABC broadcaster and well known Brisbane identity.
  • Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program 2012-13 To

    Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program 2012-13 To

    Transport and Main Roads Queensland Transport and Roads Investment Program 2012–13 to 2015–16 Foreword by the Premier and Minister The third edition of the Queensland Transport and Roads the Australian Government over and above its current level of transport networks at a safe and efficient level, continue to repair Investment Program (QTRIP) details the current transport and investment. infrastructure damaged in recent natural disasters, and focus new roads projects that the Department of Transport and Main Roads infrastructure in areas of greatest need. It is a QTRIP designed for plans to deliver over the next four years. The Queensland Rail infrastructure program is allocated one purpose – to get Queensland back on track. approximately $2.9 billion across the state to improve our rail In line with the Queensland Government’s priorities to identify network and support increasing rail services. savings and reduce government debt, this year’s QTRIP represents a return to responsible government aimed at restoring a sound We are also improving safety and reducing congestion at rail fiscal position. The Queensland Government is focussed on crossings by investing $124 million in road bridges at Bracken delivering better infrastructure and better planning. We are Ridge and Geebung, a joint initiative with local council. getting back to basics, delivering the right project, at the right time, for the best value for money. Marine infrastructure will see $125 million for projects such as targeted channel deepening at the Cairns Trinity Inlet and the Our aim is to preserve and maintain the wider transport network Gold Coast Broadwater to improve marine access.