Welcome, science globalisers!
Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships
April 22, 2021 ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation Adjusting GoToMeeting Rules for the Workshop Page 2
1 Modify your appearance for others: Click on the symbols to determine your appearance (audio, camera). They are usually located in the center of the lower end of the GoToMeeting window. Another option is to click on the „ …“ icon in the participant-window showing yourself and/or your name. There, you may also change your name visible to others. Audio and video settings can be modified in the settings menu (top right)
2 We kindly ask you to stay muted in audio and video during the workshop (except when asked by the moderator)
3 Questions may be raised through the chat section Click the chat icon (top right) Type your comment/question in the text space (lower side in chat window), „send to all“
4 No video or audio recordings! – however, chat is saved
Thank you! Introduction to ERA-LEARN Who we are and what we do
Roland Brandenburg, FFG ERA-LEARN: main goals 2018-2022
➢ support the transition of Partnerships from Horizon 2020 to Horizon Europe: ▪ interact closely with the Partnerships community and facilitate a dialogue among stakeholders ▪ provide the Partnerships community with evidence and guidance
4 ERA-LEARN: service provider
▪ central information hub: the ERA-LEARN portal www.era-learn.eu ▪ databases: ➢ networks, countries, organisations ➢ joint calls, funded projects ➢ thematic information ▪ material, guidance & toolkits ➢ joint calls & other joint activities ➢ support impact assessments ➢ good practise for specific common challenges ➢ reports ▪ interaction with community ➢ events
5 Some figures from the database Disclaimer
please consider: ➢ the ERA-LEARN database of calls and projects relies on data supplied by networks! we try to collect everything but there could be gaps ➢ graphs show preliminary data –some H2020 networks are still ongoing ➢ currently (April 2021) 5800 funded projects with 31800 research group participations ➢ some networks could/should be seen as one –e.g. some JPIs have launched several ERA-NET Cofund networks which have separate database entries ➢ nevertheless, trends with respect to countries and framework programmes are obvious
7 Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
140 137
120
100
80 80
60
40
18 20 6 0 FP6 FP7 Horizon 2020 JPI Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under FP6
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
FP6 partnerships
4
3
2
1
0 Canada Russia Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under FP7
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
20
18 FP7 partnerships
16
14
12
10
8
6
4
2
0 Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships under H2020
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
30 H2020 partnerships
25
20
15
10
5
0 Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
45
40
35
30 FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI partnerships 25
20
15
10
5
0 Participations of non-European funding orgs. in Public-Public Partnerships
participations of non-European funding organisations in P2P networks
16
14
12
10 H2020 partnerships + JPI 8
6
4
2
0 Participations of non-European funding organisations in joint calls
participations of non-European funding organisations in joint calls
400 395
350
300
250
200 184
150
100
50 41 8 0 FP6 FP7 Horizon 2020 JPI Participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls 1600 1483
1400
1200
1000
800
600
408 400 373
200
29 0 FP6 FP7 Horizon2020 JPI Participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls 600 FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI 500
400
300
200
100
0
T2S
ACT
JPND
AAL2
EMRP
SusAn
ICRAD
PRIMA EMPIR EMIDA
ENSUF
EJP RDEJP BONUS
CIRCLE
ERA-PG
SusCrop
EDCTP2 AMR JPI
GeoERA
ANIHWA
E-Rare-3 ARIMNet
BONUS+
EN-SUGI
ERA-MIN ERA-IB-2
Eurostars
NEURON
MarTERA
JPI MYBL JPI ETB-PRO
ERA-GAS ERA-CVD ERA-ARD
EMEurope
ERACAPS QuantERA
JPco-fuND
SUSFOOD
FLAG-ERA
BiodivScen
ERA-MIN2
Eurostars 2 Eurostars JPI FACCE Climate JPI ERA-HDHL
ERASysBio
ERA-ARD II ERA-ARD
ForestValue
M-ERA.NET
ERASysBio+
ERA PerMed ERA II FLAG-ERA
BiodivERsA3 BiodivERsA2
ERANet-LAC
JPCOFUND2
MANUNETIII
ERANETMED
M-ERA.NET 2 M-ERA.NET
TRANSCAN-2
HERA JRP HERA UP
HDHL-INTIMIC
ERA CoBioTech
EuroNanoMed III EuroNanoMed
WaterWorks2017 WaterWorks2015 WaterWorks2014
NEURONCofund
JPI Urban Europe Urban JPI
HERITAGE PLUS HERITAGE
FACCE SURPLUS FACCE
EN SGplusRegSys EN
WoodWisdom-Net+
GENDER NET Plus
WoodWisdom-Net 2 WoodWisdom-Net
JPI Cultural Heritage Cultural JPI
FACCE Era Net Plus Era FACCE Net
WOODWISDOM-NET ERA-NET NEURONII ERA-NET Participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
origin of non-European research groups in RTD projects funded from joint calls
300 FP6+FP7+H2020+JPI 250
200
150
100
50
0
Mali
USA
Peru
India
Chile
Togo
Cuba Niger
Brazil Qatar
Egypt Benin
China Nepal
Belize Oman
Japan
Kenya
Sudan
Bolivia
Ghana Gabon Liberia
Russia Jordan
Algeria Malawi
Angola
Nigeria Mexico
Tunisia Taiwan Guinea
Zambia
Belarus
Gambia
Canada Uganda
Ethiopia
Namibia
Senegal Rwanda Vietnam
Panama Ecuador
Uruguay
Morocco Pakistan
Thailand
Australia
Lebanon
Malaysia
Mauritius
Tanzania
Colombia
Argentina
Indonesia
Botswana
Swaziland Cambodia Nicaragua
Singapore
Zimbabwe
Cameroon
Guatemala Rica Costa
Hong Kong Hong
Bangladesh Kong Hong
Cape Verde Cape
South Africa South
Madagascar
Mozambique Leone Sierra SaudiArabia
Côte d' Ivoire Côte
Liechtenstein Burkina Faso Burkina Zealand New
EquatorialGuinea
Korea, Republic of Republic Korea,
Dominican Republic Dominican
Central African Republic African Central
Bosnia and Herzegovina and Bosnia
Lao Peoples Lao Republic Democratic
Congo, Democratic Republic of the Republic Congo, Democratic Korea, Democratic People's Republic of People's Democratic Korea, International participation in RTD projects: H2020 vs. joint calls by H2020 partnerships
participations of non-European research groups in RTD projects 2.000 9% 1.800 H2020 projects 1.600
1.400 projects funded by H2020 partnerships + JPI
1.200
1.000
800 10% 600 41% 10% 400 34% 19% 10% 7% 200 42% 26% 25% 20% 0 Korea Canada South Africa Taiwan Kenya New Brazil Australia Japan China United Russian (Republic of) Zealand (People's States Federation Republic of) Conclusions
➢ very strong general trend FP6 → FP7 → H2020 ➢ increased participation of funding organisations in network consortia ➢ increased participation of funding organisations in joint calls ➢ increased participation of research groups in funded RTD projects ➢ 2293 non-European research group participations in 5800 funded projects (vs 31800 total research group participations) = approx. 7.5% ➢ H2020 networks: 1482 of 17469 research groups in funded RTD projects = 8.5% ➢ some countries are particularly strong in applying to joint calls (compared to H2020)
19 Visit the ERA-LEARN Portal
https://www.era-learn.eu/network-information/countries
20 Thank you. Globalisation of European Partnership Initiatives- Findings from interviews with experts from practitioners
Peter Hahn and Jadranka Dokic, VDI/VDE IT Ralf König, FFG
Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships, online, April 22, 2021 Background Page 23
Globalisation is a task of most Partnerships ➔ reflected in ERA-LEARN Work plan tasks (like monitoring, evaluation, widening etc. )
Mission of task • Support Transition H2020 → Horizon Europe • Results should be useful for acting/interested persons on the level of networks/partnerships • Search for specifics rather than statistics Approach • Database analysis • Interviews • Ratings regarding single selected questions
Output Outcome Impact • Brief policy brief EC, MS • Dissemination: Website • Good/failed practice hints (for practitioners): Reflection during Workshop(s)
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Disclaimer Page 24
This was not science!
• The choice of interview partners was made in an evolving cooperative process, not following clear criteria • People were interviewed as experts – we were not collecting official statements or compiling supporting facts for opinions
• There is not „a“ Partnership – no clear limitations or borders, cross-xyz everywhere, joint actions, multiple projects under shared roofs…. • The subject „European Partnership“ is wide and comprises different types of initiatives acting on different levels (policy, agency) and in different global areas based on different motivations to do so
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Page 25
15
5 4
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings – European Partnerships Importance of motivation for globalisation Page 26
Research Excellence - Connecting to the leading global research8,1 9,0 8,1 8,0 7,0 Coordination of R&I Access to global markets 6,0 5,0 7,4roadmaps 6,5 4,0 3,0 2,0 1,0 0,0 Distribution/dissemination Avoid duplication and of knowledge (global 6,4 increase research common good orientation) 7,2 efficiency
Joint tackling of global Science diplomacy, NCP, 1 = not important 5 = average challenges 8,9 Accession FP etc. 6,1 10 = very important n = 14 average
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships International participations (funding orgs.) in P2P under FP7
20 18 FP7 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 International participations (funding orgs.) in P2P under H2020
30 H2020 25
20
15
10
5
0 Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships Identification and admission of global partners, sustained integration Page 29
Different (elements of) practices exist:
• Identification of research areas with similar challenges ➔ active search for suitable global partners • (depending on Mission/Self-perception) rather cooperation with global partners than their network integration • (open) expression of interest in global networks
• Definition of minimum requirements, formal admission rules, credibility checks, trial periods
• Recommendation of global partners in the existing Consortium of European Partnerships
Session a) will reference a good practice example for membership retention
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships Clear objectives Page 30
Thesis/Recommendation:
• Global cooperation should always follow well defined goals • Each Partnerships may determine and clearly communicate it´s driving motivation for globalisation • This may include differentiated approaches for different goals or activities
Such expectation management may
➔ Help to find and attract the right global partners and ➔ Prevent from being used for objectives and activities “out of scope” ➔ Align network activities
Session c) will address this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships Define, realise and fund functional paths for global partner integration Page 31
Preparatory measures are undertaken prior to roadmapping/call participation
• identifying suitable matching research teams/infrastructures • research areas of mutual collaboration interest • detection of and dealing with administrative barriers • Promotion on policy level where necessary • Time! • …
➔ Appropriate measures should be foreseen, and equipped with sufficient resources in work plans (funds/effort, time, preparatory meetings)
…also in the scope of session c)
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – Global Partners, global cooperation Projects Customise identification and integration of global partners? Page 32
Perception of European Partnerships among targeted global partners
• The concept of “European Partnership” is not very well understood around the globe • Global partners will have difficulties to identify you as a potential partner
➔ Search, assess and address partners yourself (as a partnership)? ➔ Be pragmatic, specific, and customize? (cooperation subject, research topics, type of activity, reciprocal administrative needs) ➔ Align/coordinate “icebreaker” (like former INCO projects, EURAXESS, BILATS etc.) with thematic networks?
➔ Make use of existing global networks on policy, agency and researcher level…competence centers, research communities? …let us know if you would like to exchange on this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships & Foreign relations Coordination of globalisation target countries and activities with stakeholders Page 33
Coordination in between policy level, diplomatic community and level of funding agency is difficult and not always fully functional
• European Partnerships have developed to be important and functional platforms for global cooperation
• Partnerships operate on the base of mutually beneficial cooperation – and they should promote themselves as instrument for sustainable implementation of diplomatic objectives in foreign relations
➔ European/national diplomatic services, Commission and MS administrations at the interface of foreign relations and science cooperation and European Partnerships should improve communication and coordination (standard procedures/tasks, contact persons, exchange platform ERA-LEARN…?)
…session b) will detail a good practice…
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships Ethics in global cooperation Page 34
A lack of dedicated ethical standards is causing “mixed feelings” “under the surface” …
• Ethical and political standards vary more in global cooperation than in EU MS cooperation settings • Areas include e.g. scientific credibility/standards, human rights, freedom of science and speech, non- discriminatory behaviour, digital sovereignty, limited use of personal data, respect of IPR (or granting of open access respectively), exclusively civilian use etc.
➔ Measures of dealing with these subjects need to be applied, distinct or implicitly, for partner search, admission, call and project cooperation
Session d) will address selected aspects of this issue
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Findings / Thesis / Recommendation – European Partnerships Evaluation of globalisation? Page 35
Evaluated outputs/outcomes/impacts seem to get high attention in the Commission
➔ Expressly evaluate globalisation in Partnership evaluation!?
…let us know if you would like to exchange on this issue…
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Page 36
Thank you!
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships ERA-LEARN WORKSHOP Attracting & Deepening Global Partnerships April 22, 2021
Klaus Niederländer Ambient Assisted Living Association Adapting to Demographic Change The AAL story of accompanying system change
Co-Creating Linking Changing Ageing (virtual) social Technology Narrative with Ageing infrastructure
❖ From Assisted Living to The New Old ❖ Virtual Communities & Active & Healthy Ageing Platforms ❖ Values- and Systems-based: Intervention domains in ❖ Inclusive, Open, Fair health & care, mobility & ❖ Legal Compliance & Ethical transport, home, Excellence community & workplace ❖ Big data, AI, Robotics ❖ Hardware: smart… ❖ Software: Apps The Active & Assisted Living Programme 2014-2020
265 projects funded 23 Funding 265 projects funded Members Euro 1.4m average average AAL member/EC project investment Over 200 1400 End–User Project org, Participants Joint EU and AAL member AAL investments of over Euro 300m
1 in 8 projects reaches the market
650 SMEs & Over 200 100 R&D org. Industry 18 Member countries with 2 non- European members (CA, TW) Governance of Global Partnerships Integrating international AAL members into Partnership structure
General Assembly – ‘Policy Level’ Canada & Taiwan full members of AAL Association
Executive Board - ’Strategy Level’ 1 of 5 Boards seats for International Relations
Management Unit & Work Groups - ‘Operational Level’ National Contact Points as members of Management Unit with regular meetings & active participation in workgroups/Steering Committee Strategy Development & Global Partnerships Networking & Knowledge
Participation International in future Meeting within partnership annual AAL strategy Forum
AAL FORUM
Regular Prospecting Knowledge of interested sharing new eco-systems, international care innovations partners Operations & Global Partnerships Participation in Calls & Support Actions
Beneficiaries of Support Actions: AAL2B Project Support, Canadian & Taiwanese Ethical Guidelines funded organisations as part of AAL project consortia
Member of Call Text Development Workgroup ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships, 22nd April 2021 ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of European Partnerships
How to coordinate Partnership globalisation with policy level foreign relations in science and diplomatic services in MS and COM?
“The Example of Senior Official Meetings as a functional node for multilateral coordination of policy and agency level”
Marianne Vaske, DLR Project Management Agency European and international Cooperation North, Central and South America
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 44 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation Short EU-LAC policy background
Madrid Action Plan 2010-2012 – “Towards a new stage in the bi-regional partnership: Innovation and technology for sustainable development and social inclusion adopted by the European Union–Latin America and Caribbean Summit“ in Madrid in 2010.
The Joint Initiative for Research and Innovation (JIRI) was established in 2010 with the aim of enhancing EU-CELAC cooperation on science and research.
Senior Officials Meetings (SOMs) are convened regularly to discuss the cooperation in the JIRI, alternating between Europe and the CELAC region.
The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) is a regional group of Latin American and Caribbean states created in 2011 to deepen Latin American integration (32 member countries in the Americas). CELAC as a group is counter part of EC in the political dialogue.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | | 45 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation Operational level: ALCUE NET and ERANet-LAC
ALCUE NET (2012-2017) was the Latin America, Caribbean and European Union Network on research and innovation to establish an EU-LAC platform bringing together actors involved in orientation, funding and implementation, as well as other relevant stakeholders from the public and private sector and civil society.
ERANet-LAC (2013-2017) helped foster bi-regional cooperation in research and innovation through concrete joint activities and creating a sustainable framework for future bi-regional joint activities with both European and Latin- American Caribbean research and innovation funding agencies and programme owners.
5 Thematic Working groups on bio-economy including food security, renewable energies, biodiversity and climate change, ICT and health discuss and make suggestions for joint actions, e.g. Joint Calls for ERANet-LAC.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 46 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation Operational level: General figures
Horizon 2020 / Horizon Europe are both accessible to research institutions and individual researchers and scientists from Latin America and the Caribbean:
In the last decade, EU framework programmes on research and innovation have mobilised around EUR 190 million for cooperation with LAC through roughly 1,500 participations in European projects.
Erasmus+ funds more than 1,400 individual mobilities between the EU and LAC countries.
The role of the NCP Network in LAC:
Extremely strong and well developed NCP Network coordinated by AUCI Uruguay:
• Provides general information on funding opportunities, raises awareness of the programme, guides potential applicants, advises on administrative procedures and contractual issues etc.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 47 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation The Common Research Area (CRA)
EU-CELAC Summit in 2015 called for moving towards a Common Research Area (CRA).
The 5th JIRI Senior Officials Meeting held in March 2016 launched the Common Research Area, building on three key pillars which are:
• Increased mobility of researchers • Access to research infrastructures • Jointly addressing common challenges, such as climate change, sustainable urbanisation, health and multilateral initiatives.
• In the 8th JIRI SOM (October 2020), Innovation has been confirmed as 4th pillar of the CRA
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 48 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation The Common Research Area (CRA)
6th JIRI SOM in March 2017: agreed on concrete policy mechanisms to implement the priorities discussed under the CRA:
• EU-CELAC Research Infrastructures (RI) working group to support policy coordination and exchange of information on RI; • CELAC Mobility portal, providing information on national jobs and funding opportunities for researchers. The portal is based on the EURAXESS experience; • Targeted cooperation with CELAC countries under Horizon 2020 in the fields of Health (chronic diseases), Climate change and sustainable urbanisation.
These issues were reinforced in the 7th JIRI SOM in October 2017:
• Reinforcement of the above priorities. • Need to strengthen the innovation dimension of the EU-CELAC cooperation. • Acknowledgement of International Cooperation Services Facility’s support to the JIRI
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | | 49 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation The Common Research Area (CRA)
3 years no physical SOM
3 preparatory meetings to ensure a successful 8th SOM in October 2020.
Note: In January 2020, Brazil left the CELAC. Consequently, the 8th SOM took place without Brazil.
Results: Innovation has been confirmed as 4. pillar of the Common Research Area. A prior developed draft EU-LAC Roadmap was acknowledged – the formal procedure to adopting the Roadmap is going on.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 50 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation The EU-LAC Interest Group – Platform for funders
2017 – ERANet-LAC and ALCUE Net ended and with them the operational support. A parallel structure was constituted:
EU-LAC Interest Group
29 funding agencies from Latin America, the Caribbean countries and the EU Member States and Associated Countries.
Outcomes to date: 3 joint calls with a total of 55 funded projects and 26,7 million € public funding Topics: Biodiversity, Bioeconomy, Energy, Health, ICT https://www.eucelac-platform.eu/
Aims to support the implementation of the Common EU-LAC Research Area. EC is not participating directly but has a specific view in terms of maintaining the overall coherence with the Governance of the EU-LAC relations.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 51 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation The role of the International Service Facility
The Service Facility in support of International Cooperation in Research and Innovation assists the European Commission (EC) in reinforcing international policy dialogues world- wide and identifying opportunities for increased cooperation, including the support of National Contact Points in European Union Partner Countries.
Objective of the SF in the EU-CELAC context:
Support the operation of the EU-CELAC JIRI and the implementation of the CRA:
The structural support to the JIRI ensures:
• Coordination of activities at biregional level, the streamlining of communication, instruments and activities under Common Research Area pillars; • Preparation of Senior Officials Meetings; • Organisation of regional thematic workshops to implement the CRA priorities.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 52 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation EU-CELAC Senior Official Meetings as a functional node for multilateral coordination of policy and agency level
Senior Officials Meetings
• are convened regularly (1/year) to discuss the cooperation in the JIRI and foster the bi-regional dialogue on issues of global significance, like health, green transition, digital transformation or innovation
are the main body for biregional strategic coordination of the STI policies;
• discuss and initiate new thematic areas, priority topics, objectives;
• ideally allow active preparation, participation and topic setting of all countries from both regions.
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 53 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation Towards a successful SOM and a sustainable political dialogue
• SOM lays the ground for concrete joint activities and thus creates a framework for successful bi-regional joint activities. But: It does realize the operational steps and activities.
• Both regions must act on equal terms, e.g. - alternating between Europe and the CELAC region; - all countries in the region must have the opportunity to actively participate in the political process.
• Ensure regular meetings / reliable time-schedule to keep the momentum.
• Regularly organized SOMs should define incremental steps.
• Set clear goals and measure how effectively they have been achieved (SOM Concept Note presents status quo).
• Challenge: Heterogeneity of CELAC countries (size, resources, political and social environment etc).
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 54 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation Thank you for your attention!
For further information please contact:
Marianne Vaske
DLR Project Management Agency European and international Cooperation North, Central and South America
Telephone +49 228 3821-1439 [email protected]
Marianne Vaske, DLR | 22nd April 2021 | 55 Ihr verlässlicher Partner für Forschung, Bildung und Innovation FACCE-JPI: open to the world
Always the right instrument for mutually beneficial cooperation? Scientific and diplomatic objectives, Partnership cooperation instruments and their varying appropriateness for global cooperation “Clear subjects and scope for global cooperation and a pragmatic view on global operation modi – lessons from FACCE JPI (
Heather McKhann Joint Programming Coordinator Executive Secretariat, Initiative on Agriculture, Food Security FACCE-JPI and Climate 22 April 2021 Change ERA-LEARN workshop FACCE-JPI Joint Actions
ALIGNMENT Knowledge Hubs: MACSUR 1 + 2, Sci-Pol Hub, Food and Nutrition Knowledge Hub Knowledge Network on Sustainable Intensification Thematic Annual Programming Network on Soil 50% of joint actions have been CALLS developed in cooperation with other Multi-partner call (with GRA countries) international/EU initiatives Call with Belmont Forum Call with BiodivERsA 138 past and current projects Call with Water JPI (WaterWorks 2015) 5 FACCE ERA-NETs 250M€ mobilised FACCE ERA-NET Plus – 1 call https://project-wheel.faccejpi.net/ FACCE SURPLUS – 3 calls FACCE ERA-GAS – 1 « own » call, 1 joint call and 1 joint call upcoming SusCrop– 2 calls, 1 upcoming FOSC – 1 call, 1 upcoming OTHER EJP Soil ALL-Ready – CSA to prepare Agroecology partnership Exploratory and mapping workshops –ca. 25
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 57 FACCE-JPI European and International Cooperation Strategy Objectives (2016)
Promote collaboration, complementarity and structuring of 1 research to tackle global challenges more effectively
Improve the visibility and impact of FACCE-JPI’s work on 2 policymaking and innovation in Europe and beyond
3 Facilitate the exchange of information, mutual learning and capacity building with similar initiatives in other regions
→ Since November 2020, Vice Chair for international relations Jean-François Soussana
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 58 Why ?
• Strengthen FACCE-JPI’s role as the strategic hub for coordinating and aligning research in its thematic remit • Work with other European initiatives to foster science-policy and science-innovation links, in view of increasing impact • Foster international collaboration, first with developed countries (NZ, USA, Canada), to build critical mass and expand the array of scientific evidence • Leverage international research alliances, to strengthen collaboration and synergies with other countries
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 59 Target groups and partners (at programmatic and strategic /institutional levels)
European initiatives International initiatives Non-EU and non- Associated countries
JPI Water, JPI Healthy Diets Belmont Forum, GRA, New Zealand, USA, for a Healthy Life, JPI GACSA, 4 per 1000 Canada, Japan Climate, JPI Oceans, initiative, AgMIP, TempAg, ERA-NETs (e.g. PRIMA, International Bio- China, Brazil, India, South BioDivERsA), COST, EIP Economy Forum Africa Agri, Climate KIC*, JRC*
Structuring of R&I at EU Increased synergies in Increased synergies, level and strengthening R&I, visibility and “science diplomacy” of the European impact at the global and mutual learning Research Area level
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 60 Main modalities of engagement
Information • Exchange information on existing research projects, results and exchange methods (e.g., with other JPIs)
• Coordination and complementarity of research work (e.g., with Coordination 4/1000 International Research Initiative)
• Development of joint calls for new research proposals (e.g., with the Belmont Forum, USA, Canada) and ERA-NETs (e.g., with Water JPI) • Development of joint Knowledge Hubs (e.g. with JPI HDHL) Collaboration • Exchange, coordination, harmonisation of data (e.g., with JRC) • Participation in FACCE-led ERA-NETs (e.g., New Zealand, Canada) • Participation in partner-led activities (e.g., JPI Climate)
• Membership in the Governing Board (e.g., New Zealand, SCAR) Institutional or strategic • Membership in the Scientific or Stakeholder Board (e.g., Climate KIC) partnership • Strategic partnership (e.g., with GRA, BioDiversa ERA-NET)
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 61 Criteria for selecting and prioritising partners
✓ Thematic overlap with the FACCE-JPI Strategic Research Agenda and current work programme (« Implementation Plan ») ✓ « Key player » in the thematic remit of FACCE-JPI (e.g., in terms of public R&D investments, scientific publications, visibility) ✓ Availability of funding and compatibility with the research funding procedures of FACCE-JPI ✓ Mutual interest in and internal capacities for collaboration
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 62 Lessons learnt: Key success factors and challenges
❖ Collaboration needs to add value (e.g., ❖ Complexity of the European R&I focus on an cross-disciplinary topic; landscape and funding modalities generate additional data; facilitate data ❖ Agreement on a common topic and standardisation) modality for collaboration can take time ❖ The joint action is co-constructed from ❖ Difference of timing in research the start (no « add-on ») programming/programme development ❖ Genuine commitment at policy, funding ❖ Need of interoperable funding and and research performing levels reporting procedures ❖ Trust-building ❖ Legal hurdles ❖ Stakeholder mapping (within partner ❖ Lack of clarity regarding future funding organisations) priorities
Joint Programming Init iat ive on Agriculture, Food Sec urit y and C limate C hange - www.facc ejpi.com 63 Thank you for your attention!
Joint Programming Initiative on [email protected] Agriculture, Food Security and Climate www.faccejpi.net Change @faccejpi Ethical standards for cooperation with global partners – Who do “we” collaborate with and how?
“(Some) ethical issues of global Partnership cooperation – and ways to tackle them”
Laura Marin JPIAMR Head of Secretariat The Joint Programming Initiative on Antimicrobial Resistance
April 2021
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR No Antibiotics: top global political agenda “Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) is one of the ten major challenges to global health for the decade”
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR Uniting 28 countries to address AMR JPIAMR: A global organisation for Working Antibiotics for Everyone
International collaborative platform
Coordinates AMR research and funding on a global scale
Facilitates interface of prioritised research with policy impact
Supports and funds AMR One Health research
The European Commission (DG Research) is a full non- voting member www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR Global worldwide distribution of over the 1.300 researchers supported in JPIAMR projects
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR Who do “we” collaborate with and “how”? International Partnerships - Membership criteria, influence trough international bodies and development agencies
• MEMBERSHIP – formal process and criteria • Formal application letter signed by a governmental representative with motivation rationale including country´s interest and commitments in the AMR field, listing AMR policies and research programs
• OTHER WAYS OF COLLABORATION • Engagement with Developing Aid Agencies to fund scientific activities and researchers in LMICs • Providing input at the international level through evidence-based international interventions e.g. WHO
• INVOLVEMENT THROUGH SCIENCE DIPLOMACY • Global regional workshops
www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR Who do “we” collaborate with and “how”? Regional workshops: Latin America (2019); Asia (2019); Eastern Europe (2019); Africa (2021)
Organising Committee Dr. Kyeong Kyu Kim, Sungkyunkwan University, Korea Dr. Shoji Miyagawa, AMED, Japan Dr. Yumiko Miyashita, AMED, Japan Dr. Seon-Won Kim, NRF, Korea Dr. Akhilesh K. Chaurasia, IAMRT, SKKU, Korea Dr. Laura Plant, JPIAMR Dr. Jie-ming Qu, Medical School of Shanghai Jiaotong Univ., China Program Committee Dr. Marc Lemonnier, JPIAMR Scientific Advisory Board, France Dr. You-Hee Cho, Cha University, Korea Dr. Kunihiko Nishino, Osaka University, Japan Dr. Xinshan Ye, Peking University, China www.jpiamr.eu twitter.com/JPIAMR facebook.com/JPIAMR Dr. Aixin Yan, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Way forward Page 72
• Register yourself for follow-up sessions on May 25, 2021 https://www.era-learn.eu/registration/second-era-learn-exchange-on-globalisation-of-european- partnerships-may-25-2021/view (access link from chat window!)
• Name additional topics if we missed something interesting
• Forward the registration link to EUROPEAN practitioners or stakeholders you consider appropriate for discussions about it
• Let us know if you volunteer as a moderator for a specific session (please send to [email protected])
• Send (links to) documents about good practices to [email protected], if/where available
• The draft brief policy brief will be finalised
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships Page 73
Thank you - Looking forward to seeing you on May 25!
The ERA-LEARN Team
ERA-LEARN Workshop on Globalisation of Partnerships